Abstract
Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is a key signaling molecule involved in migraine pathophysiology. Efficacy of CGRP monoclonal antibodies and antagonists in migraine treatment has fueled an increasing interest in the prospect of treating cluster headache (CH) with CGRP antagonism. The exact role of CGRP and its mechanism of action in CH have not been fully clarified. A search for original studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English was performed in PubMed and in ClinicalTrials.gov. The search term used was “cluster headache and calcitonin gene related peptide” and “primary headaches and calcitonin gene related peptide.” Reference lists of identified articles were also searched for additional relevant papers. Human experimental studies have reported elevated plasma CGRP levels during both spontaneous and glyceryl trinitrate-induced cluster attacks. CGRP may play an important role in cluster headache pathophysiology. More refined human studies are warranted with regard to assay validation and using larger sample sizes. The results from RCTs may reveal the therapeutic potential of CGRP monoclonal antibodies and antagonists for cluster headache treatment.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Cluster headache (CH) is a disabling neurological disorder encountered in clinical practices. The prevalence of CH is less than 1% of the global population [1, 2]. CH is believed to be one of the most painful conditions in humans [3]. An online interview study reported that 55% of CH sufferers in the US population reported suicidal thoughts and 2% had attempted suicide [4]. The pathophysiology of CH is complex and not fully clarified [3], and current pharmacological treatments are suboptimal [5]. To date, there are no preventive agents approved for CH, only some off-label treatments. Therefore, new acute and preventive mechanism-based treatment strategies are warranted.
Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) was first identified in the early 1980s [6, 7] and was later shown to be one of the most potent vasodilators of cranial arteries [8]. CGRP plays a key role in the trigeminal-autonomic reflex [9], and in clinical studies, CGRP has emerged as a key signaling molecule in headache pathogenesis [10]. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have now demonstrated that monoclonal antibodies and antagonists targeting the CGRP molecule or its receptor are effective in acute [11,12,13] and preventive [14,15,16,17] treatment of migraine. Currently, four RCTs are underway with monoclonal antibodies against CGRP in CH patients [18,19,20,21].
The aims of this review are to describe the relevance of CGRP in relation to CH and to outline future treatment perspectives on the use of monoclonal antibodies and antagonists targeting CGRP to better fulfill the therapeutic needs of CH patients.
Pathophysiology of cluster headache
The current consensus on the pathophysiology of CH revolves around the following three features: ipsilateral cranial autonomic manifestations, trigeminal distribution of pain, and circadian and circannual periodicity of attacks [22]. For a more detailed description on CH pathophysiology, interested readers are referred to recent reviews [3, 23].
The cluster attacks are accompanied by lacrimation, nasal congestion, and conjunctival injection [24]. These cranial autonomic symptoms might result from activation of the trigeminal-autonomic reflex through activation of trigeminal sensory afferents [22]. Indeed, vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP), a marker for this activation, is elevated in ipsilateral jugular venous blood during cluster attacks [25]. Recently, studies have reported efficacy of sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) stimulation as a mechanism for blocking efferent parasympathetic outflow [26]. One study demonstrated that low-frequency induced cluster-like attacks with autonomic manifestations could be reversed with high-frequency SPG stimulation [27]. Interestingly, long-term preventative effects of SPG stimulation on CH attacks have also been reported recently [28].
Although severe head pain is prominent and debilitating for CH sufferers, this aspect has received limited attention. The major focus of clinical research has been on the role of the hypothalamus due to the circadian and circannual periodicity of cluster attacks. It has been suggested that the hypothalamus could function as a modulator of the trigeminal-autonomic reflex [22, 29]. This hypothesis was supported by the pioneering work of May and colleagues [30]. In a structural imaging study, the authors found increased posterior hypothalamic gray matter in CH patients compared with healthy controls. However, this finding could not be confirmed in a larger patient population sample [31]. Functional imaging studies added more evidence to hypothalamic involvement in CH by demonstrating activation of gray matter in the hypothalamus during both spontaneous [32] and nitroglycerine-induced [33] cluster attacks. Furthermore, previous studies have also reported some effect of hypothalamic deep brain stimulation for CH treatment [34,35,36]. In the context of hypothalamic involvement in CH, it is intriguing that CGRP seems to play a role in neurobehavioral processing and modulation [37], probably via an interaction with dopaminergic neurotransmission [38]. Two studies have also reported elevated dopamine plasma levels in CH patients compared with healthy controls [39, 40]. Thus, CGRP-mediated increases in plasma levels of dopamine might be implicated within the broader frame of hypothalamic involvement in CH pathophysiology.
CGRP and cluster headache
CGRP is widely distributed in the peripheral and central nervous systems in animals and humans [41,42,43,44]. In animals, CGRP has been found to be contained in trigeminal afferents [9], which comprise the sole sensory innervation of cerebral vessels [45], and has been shown to be released upon in vitro stimulation of the trigeminal ganglion [46]. In an important study, Goadsby et al. investigated the CGRP response to thermocoagulation of the trigeminal ganglion in humans [47]. CGRP plasma levels were found to be elevated in the extracerebral circulation during electrical stimulation of the trigeminal ganglion. The authors suggested that CGRP is released in response to activation of the nociceptive afferent trigeminal system. In support, CGRP was reported to alter the blood oxygen level-dependent signal in the brain in response to noxious heat stimuli in healthy volunteers [48]. In addition, the effects were reversed by the administration of sumatriptan [48]. This study suggested a modulatory role of CGRP in trigeminal pain pathways. In animal models, CGRP did not activate and sensitize meningeal nociceptors [49]. At present, the exact role of CGRP in trigeminal nociception is not fully clarified. However, Feistel et al. demonstrated that the CGRP antagonist MK-8825 decreased spinal trigeminal activity during nitroglycerine infusion in rats [50].
In 1994, the first study in humans was conducted showing elevated CGRP plasma levels during spontaneous cluster attacks [25]. CGRP changes were examined in blood samples collected from the external jugular vein in 13 patients (10 male vs. 3 female) with spontaneous cluster attacks. Elevated CGRP plasma levels were found during attacks (110 ± 7 pmol/l) compared with controls (41 ± 6 pmol/l). Furthermore, oxygen inhalation or subcutaneous injection of sumatriptan normalized the elevation in CGRP (38 ± 6 pmol/l).
Two studies investigated CGRP indirectly by measuring CGRP plasma levels after triggering cluster attacks using sublingually administered glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) [51, 52]. Both studies assessed baseline CGRP levels before GTN administration and reported elevated CGRP levels in CH patients who were in an active cluster bout. Moreover, CGRP levels returned to normal after spontaneous resolution of attacks or after sumatriptan administration [52]. No increase was found in patients who were in a complete remission state compared to those in active cluster bouts [51]. Another study also reported elevated CGRP levels in the external jugular vein interictally during active period and normal levels in patients in a complete remission state [53]. Interestingly, administration of corticosteroids decreased CGRP levels in the same patients [53].
Methodological limitations in CGRP and cluster headache studies
In the face of developing more refined experiments, lessons can be learned by looking at previous studies investigating CGRP levels during spontaneous or GTN-induced cluster attacks. In these studies, there are several methodological limitations worth noting. First, none of studies investigating CGRP levels during spontaneous or GTN-induced cluster attacks were placebo-controlled [25, 51, 52]. Therefore, spontaneous decrease in CGRP plasma levels over the course of cluster attacks cannot be excluded. In fact, Fanciullacci et al. reported complete reversal of elevated CGRP levels after spontaneous remission of GTN-induced cluster attacks [52]. The studies also reported conflicting plasma levels of CGRP [25, 51, 52]. Goadsby et al. reported a CGRP concentration of 110 ± 7 pmol/l during cluster attacks [25], while Fanciullacci et al. found a concentration of approximately 50 pmol/l at the peak of attacks [52]. The latter reported baseline CGRP levels of approximately 20 pmol/l [52]. In addition, Goadsby et al. did not measure baseline values and most of the patients were not drug-free at the time of the study [25]. Preventive medication used by patients could also influence measurements of CGRP concentrations in plasma. The discrepancies in plasma results might also be due to assay variation, which raises questions of measurement validity. In view of this, an issue of compartment for measuring CGRP should also be raised. It is uncertain to what extent CGRP concentrations in plasma reflect trigeminal CGRP release. Furthermore, administration of sumatriptan was reported to normalize CGRP levels in both the spontaneous and GTN-induced studies [25, 51, 52]. A possible triptan mechanism of action could be mediated by direct inhibition via presynaptic 5-HT1 receptors on trigeminal nerve endings [54]. Interestingly, one study found that sumatriptan does not alter plasma CGRP levels in healthy volunteers [55]. The authors speculated that triptans do not have a direct CGRP-reducing effect during trigemino-vascular inactivity.
Future perspectives
Future studies should investigate whether CGRP infusion induces cluster attacks in CH patients. In addition, studies should continue to explore the promise of using CGRP as a biomarker for trigeminal nociceptive activation. Validated assays and large sample sizes should be prioritized. For this purpose, replication of results in different labs and blind study designs would be important. Furthermore, deep phenotyping and data gathering on concomitant acute and preventive medication would play an important role in stratifying the patients. If CGRP monoclonal antibodies and antagonists prove to be effective, it would be interesting to examine whether we can predict the efficacy of these drugs on phenotyped CH sufferers. Also, it would indicate that migraine and CH share a common neurobiological pathway, because a majority of migraine patients get delayed migraine-like headache attacks after CGRP infusion [56,57,58]. For now, four RCT studies are underway targeting CGRP with monoclonal antibodies [18,19,20,21]. In the future, results from these RCTs will be needed in order to conclude on the promise of better acute and preventive CH treatment using monoclonal antibodies and antagonists against CGRP.
CGRP, calcitonin gene-related peptide; CH, cluster headache; RCTs, randomized clinical trials; VIP, vasoactive intestinal polypeptide; SPG, sphenopalatine ganglion; GTN, glyceryl trinitrate
References
Robbins MS, Lipton RB (2010) The epidemiology of primary headache disorders. Semin Neurol 30:107–119
Russell MB (2004) Epidemiology and genetics of cluster headache. Lancet Neurol 3:279–283
May A (2005) Cluster headache: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Lancet 366:843–855
Rozen TD, Fishman RS (2012) Cluster headache in the United States of America: demographics, clinical characteristics, triggers, suicidality, and personal burden. Headache 52:99–113
Schuster NM, Rapoport AM (2016) New strategies for the treatment and prevention of primary headache disorders. Nat Rev Neurol 12:635–650
Amara SG, Jonas V, Rosenfeld MG, Ong ES, Evans RM (1982) Alternative RNA processing in calcitonin gene expression generates mRNAs encoding different polypeptide products. Nature 298:240–244
Rosenfeld MG, Mermod JJ, Amara SG, Swanson LW, Sawchenko PE, Rivier J, Vale WW, Evans RM (1983) Production of a novel neuropeptide encoded by the calcitonin gene via tissue-specific RNA processing. Nature 304:129–135
Edvinsson L, Ekman R, Jansen I, Ottosson A, Uddman R (1987) Peptide-containing nerve fibers in human cerebral arteries: immunocytochemistry, radioimmunoassay, and in vitro pharmacology. Ann Neurol 21:431–437
McCulloch J, Uddman R, Kingman TA, Edvinsson L (1986) Calcitonin gene-related peptide: functional role in cerebrovascular regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 83:5731–5735
Ashina H, Schytz HW, Ashina M (2016) CGRP in human models of primary headaches. Cephalalgia [Epub ahead of print]
Ho TW, Mannix LK, Fan X, Assaid C, Furtek C, Jones CJ, Lines CR, Rapoport AM; MK-0974 Protocol 004 study group (2008) Randomized controlled trial of an oral CGRP receptor antagonist, MK-0974, in acute treatment of migraine. Neurology 70:1304–1312
Voss T, Lipton RB, Dodick DW, Dupre N, Ge JY, Bachman R, Assaid C, Aurora SK, Michelson D (2016) A phase IIb randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine. Cephalalgia 36:887–898
Olesen J, Diener HC, Husstedt IW, Goadsby PJ, Hall D, Meier U, Pollentier S, Lesko LM, BIBN 4096 BS Clinical Proof of Concept Study Group (2004) Calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist BIBN 4096 BS for the acute treatment of migraine. N Engl J Med 350:1104–1110
Sun H, Dodick DW, Silberstein S, Goadsby PJ, Reuter U, Ashina M, Saper J, Cady R, Chon Y, Dietrich J, Lenz R (2016) Safety and efficacy of AMG 334 for prevention of episodic migraine: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol 15:382–390
Bigal ME, Edvinsson L, Rapoport AM, Lipton RB, Spierings EL, Diener HC, Burstein R, Loupe PS, Ma Y, Yang R, Silberstein SD (2015) Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of TEV-48125 for preventive treatment of chronic migraine: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b study. Lancet Neurol 14:1091–1100
Dodick DW, Goadsby PJ, Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, Olesen J, Ashina M, Wilks K, Kudrow D, Kroll R, Kohrman B, Bargar R, Hirman J, Smith J; ALD403 study investigators (2014) Safety and efficacy of ALD403, an antibody to calcitonin gene-related peptide, for the prevention of frequent episodic migraine: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, exploratory phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol 13: 1100–1107
Dodick DW, Goadsby PJ, Spierings EL, Scherer JC, Sweeney SP, Grayzel DS (2014) Safety and efficacy of LY2951742, a monoclonal antibody to calcitonin gene-related peptide, for the prevention of migraine: a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Lancet Neurol 13:885–892
Eli Lilly and Company. A study of LY2951742 in participants with episodic cluster headache. In ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). 2000-[cited 2017 March 27] Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02397473
Eli Lilly and Company. A study of LY2951742 in participants with chronic cluster headache. In ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). 2000-[cited 2017 June 4]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02438826
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products, R&D Inc. A study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TEV-48125 for the prevention of episodic cluster headache (ECH). Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). 2000-[cited 2017 June 4]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02945046
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products, R&D Inc. A study comparing the efficacy and safety of TEV-48125 (fremanezumab) for the prevention of chronic cluster headache (CCH). Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). 2000-[cited 2017 June 4] Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02964338
Goadsby PJ (2002) Pathophysiology of cluster headache: a trigeminal autonomic cephalgia. Lancet Neurol 1:251–257
Obermann M, Matharu M (2015) Pathophysiology of cluster headache: current status and future directions. In: Ashina, Messoud, Geppetti, Pierangelo (eds) Pathophysiology of headaches—from molecule to man. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, pp 247–258
The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version) (2013) Cephalalgia 33:629–808
Goadsby PJ, Edvinsson L (1994) Human in vivo evidence for trigeminovascular activation in cluster headache. Neuropeptide changes and effects of acute attacks therapies. Brain 117:427–434
Schoenen J, Jensen RH, Lantéri-Minet M, Láinez MJ, Gaul C, Goodman AM, Caparso A, May A (2013) Stimulation of the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) for cluster headache treatment. Pathway CH-1: a randomized, sham-controlled study. Cephalalgia 33:816–830
Schytz HW, Barløse M, Guo S, Selb J, Caparso A, Jensen R, Ashina M (2013) Experimental activation of the sphenopalatine ganglion provokes cluster-like attacks in humans. Cephalalgia 33:831–841
Jürgens TP, Barloese M, May A, Láinez JM, Schoenen J, Gaul C, Goodman AM, Caparso A, Jensen RH (2017) Long-term effectiveness of sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation for cluster headache. Cephalalgia 37:423–434
Leone M, Bussone G (2009) Pathophysiology of trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias. Lancet Neurol 8:755–764
May A, Ashburner J, Büchel C, McGonigle DJ, Friston KJ, Frackowiak RS, Goadsby PJ (1999) Correlation between structural and functional changes in brain in an idiopathic headache syndrome. Nat Med 5:836–838
Matharu MS (2006) Functional and structural neuroimaging in primary headache disorders. PhD thesis. Headache Group, Institute of Neurology and The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London
Sprenger T, Boecker H, Tolle TR, Bussone G, May A, Leone M (2004) Specific hypothalamic activation during a spontaneous cluster headache attack. Neurology 62:516–517
May A, Bahra A, Buchel C, Frackowiak RS, Goadsby PJ (1998) Hypothalamic activation in cluster headache attacks. Lancet 352:275–278
Leone M, Franzini A, Broggi G, Mea E, Cecchini AP, Bussone G (2006) Acute hypothalamic stimulation and ongoing cluster headache attacks. Neurology 67:1844–1845
Leone M, Franzini A, Cecchini AP, Broggi G, Bussone G (2010) Hypothalamic deep brain stimulation in the treatment of chronic cluster headache. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 3:187–195
Leone M, Franzini A, Broggi G, Bussone G (2006) Hypothalamic stimulation for intractable cluster headache: long-term experience. Neurology 67:150–152
van Rossum D, Hanisch UK, Quirion R (1997) Neuroanatomical localization, pharmacological characterization and functions of CGRP, related peptides and their receptors. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 21:649–678
Deutch AY, Roth RH (1987) Calcitonin gene-related peptide in the ventral tegmental area: selective modulation of prefrontal cortical dopamine metabolism. Neurosci Lett 74:169–174
D’Andrea G, Granella F, Perini F, Farruggio A, Leone M, Bussone G (2006) Platelet levels of dopamine are increased in migraine and cluster headache. Headache 46:585–591
D'Andrea G, Leone M, Bussone G, Fiore PD, Bolner A, Aguggia M, Saracco MG, Perini F, Giordano G, Gucciardi A, Leon A (2017) Abnormal tyrosine metabolism in chronic cluster headache. Cephalalgia 37:148–153
Eftekhari S, Edvinsson L (2011) Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and its receptor components in human and rat spinal trigeminal nucleus and spinal cord at C1-level. BMC Neurosci 12:112–112
Hostetler ED, Joshi AD, Sanabria-Bohórquez S, Fan H, Zeng Z, Purcell M, Gantert L, Riffel K, Williams M, O'Malley S, Miller P, Selnick HG, Gallicchio SN, Bell IM, Salvatore CA, Kane SA, Li CC, Hargreaves RJ, de Groot T, Bormans G, Van Hecken A, Derdelinckx I, de Hoon J, Reynders T, Declercq R, De Lepeleire I, Kennedy WP, Blanchard R, Marcantonio EE, Sur C, Cook JJ, Van Laere K, Evelhoch JL (2013) In vivo quantification of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor occupancy by telcagepant in rhesus monkey and human brain using the positron emission tomography (PET) tracer [11C]MK-4232. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 347:478–486
Tajti J, Uddman R, Edvinsson L (2001) Neuropeptide localization in the “migraine generator” region of the human brainstem. Cephalalgia 21:96–101
van Rossum D, Hanisch UK, Quirion R (1997) Neuroanatomical localization, pharmacological characterization and functions of CGRP, related peptides and their receptors. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 21:649–678
May A, Goadsby PJ (1999) The trigeminovascular system in humans: pathophysiologic implications for primary headache syndromes of the neural influences on the cerebral circulation. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 19:115–127
Mason RT, Peterfreund RA, Sawchenko PE, Corrigan AZ, Rivier JE, Vale WW (1984) Release of the predicted calcitonin gene-related peptide from cultured rat trigeminal ganglion cells. Nature 308:653–655
Goadsby PJ, Edvinsson L, Ekman R (1988) Release of vasoactive peptides in the extracerebral circulation of humans and the cat during activation of the trigeminovascular system. Ann Neurol 23:193–196
Asghar MS, Becerra L, Larsson HB, Borsook D, Ashina M (2016) Calcitonin gene-related peptide modulates heat nociception in the human brain—an fMRI study in healthy volunteers. PLoS One 11:e0150334
Levy D, Burstein R, Strassman AM (2005) Calcitonin gene-related peptide does not excite or sensitize meningeal nociceptors: implications for the pathophysiology of migraine. Ann Neurol 58:698–705
Feistel S, Albrecht S, Messlinger K (2013) The calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist MK-8825 decreases spinal trigeminal activity during nitroglycerin infusion. J Headache Pain 14:93
Fanciullacci M, Alessandri M, Sicuteri R, Marabini S (1997) Responsiveness of the trigeminovascular system to nitroglycerine in cluster headache patients. Brain 120:283–288
Fanciullacci M, Alessandri M, Figini M, Geppetti P, Michelacci S (1995) Increase in plasma calcitonin gene-related peptide from the extracerebral circulation during nitroglycerin-induced cluster headache attack. Pain 60:119–123
Neeb L, Anders L, Euskirchen P, Hoffmann J, Israel H, Reuter U (2015) Corticosteroids alter CGRP and melatonin release in cluster headache episodes. Cephalalgia 35:317–326
Buzzi MG, Carter WB, Shimizu T, Health H 3rd, Moskowitz MA (1991) Dihydroergotamine and sumatriptan attenuate levels of CGRP in plasma in rat superior sagittal sinus during electrical stimulation of the trigeminal ganglion. Neuropharmacology 30:1193–1200
Hansen JM, Petersen J, Wienecke T, Olsen KS, Jensen LT, Ashina M (2009) Sumatriptan does not change calcitonin gene-related peptide in the cephalic and extracephalic circulation in healthy volunteers. J Headache Pain 10:85–91
Hansen JM, Hauge AW, Olesen J, Ashina M (2010) Calcitonin gene-related peptide triggers migraine-like attacks in patients with migraine with aura. Cephalalgia 30:1179–1186
Asghar MS, Hansen AE, Amin FM, van der Geest RJ, Pv K, Larsson HB, Olesen J, Ashina M (2011) Evidence for a vascular factor in migraine. Ann Neurol 69:635–645
Lassen LH, Haderslev PA, Jacobsen VB, Iversen HK, Sperling B, Olesen J (2002) CGRP may play a causative role in migraine. Cephalalgia 22:54–61
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
HA conducted the literature search. All the authors contributed with data interpretation, drafting, and revision of the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Håkan Ashina has no disclosures. Lawrence Newman has received honoraria for his work as a consultant for Allergan, Amgen, Alder, Avanir, Depomed, E Neura, and Supernus. Sait Ashina received honoraria for lecturing from Allergan and Avanir Pharmaceuticals. Sait Ashina is also a principal investigator for Alder Pharmaceuticals trial NCT02974153.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ashina, H., Newman, L. & Ashina, S. Calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonism and cluster headache: an emerging new treatment. Neurol Sci 38, 2089–2093 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-017-3101-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-017-3101-8