Abstract
Introduction
Microvascular dysfunction is the key element in the pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis (SSc), whereas the contribution of large and medium size vessel abnormalities is yet to be established. The aim of the present study is to assess the association between micro- and macrovascular function by utilizing a broad spectrum of assessments of vascular performance.
Methods
We included consecutive, consenting SSc patients who underwent nailfold video capillaroscopy (NVC) for microcirculation evaluation. Peripheral and central systolic and diastolic blood pressure, carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT), aortic augmentation index (AIx) corrected for a heart rate of 75 beats per minute (AIx-75), and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) were also performed to assess macrovascular function. Cardiovascular risk disease (CVD) algorithms were also calculated and included in the analysis.
Results
A total of 81 patients (6 males) were studied with mean age 55.44 ± 13.40 years. Reduced capillary density was inversely correlated with arterial stiffness (Alx-75) and augmentation pressure (r = − 0.262, p = 0.018, and r = − 0.249, p = 0.025 respectively). Alx was significantly lower in the early compared to late pattern (28.24 ± 11.75 vs 35.63 ± 10.47, p = 0.036). A significant trend was found among NVC patterns with Alx-75 values being higher with the progression of microangiopathy towards the “late” group (26.36 ± 10.90 vs 30.81 ± 11.59 vs 35.21 ± 7.90, p = 0.027 for trend). Similarly, Framingham risk score and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease score were progressively higher across the worsening NVC patterns (4.10 ± 4.13 vs 2.99 ± 2.72 vs 6.36 ± 5.65, p = 0.023, and 6.99 ± 7.18 vs 5.63 ± 4.41 vs 12.09 ± 9.90, p = 0.019, respectively, for trends). Finally, QRISK3 (10-year cardiovascular disease risk) and ASCVD (Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease) scores were inversely correlated with the number of capillaries (r = − 0.231, p = 0.048, and r = − 0.260, p = 0.038 respectively).
Conclusion
These data suggest that CVD risk scores and macrovascular parameters are strongly correlated with microvasculopathy in patients with SSc.
Key Points • Microangiopathy is the hallmark of SSc, but the relationship between subclinical atherosclerosis and small vessel disease remains unknown. • Arterial stiffening and CVD risk scores are positively associated with the degree of progression of peripheral microvasculopathy assessed with NVC. • The results of the study suggest an association between NVC abnormalities and higher CVD risk in SSc patients. |
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare systemic connective tissue disease characterized by microvascular damage, immune dysregulation, and extensive skin and internal organ fibrosis [1]. The course and prognosis of the SSc is mainly determined by the extent and severity of involvement of visceral organs and in particular by cardiopulmonary complications that represent the leading cause of death in this population [2, 3]. Impairment of the microcirculation represents the primary event that progressively stimulates the fibrotic process and results in typical clinical manifestations such as Raynaud’s syndrome, digital ulcers, pulmonary arterial hypertension, and renal crisis [4].
Besides the well-described microcirculatory injury, macrovascular, atherosclerotic disease has emerged as a significant component of generalized vascular pathology [5, 6] which may—at least partially—account for the increased rate of cardiovascular (CV) events reported in patients with SSc [7]. In particular, a number of studies have shown functional and morphological abnormalities of large and medium size vessels assessed by aortic augmentation index (AIx-75), carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) [8, 9], and carotid intima-media thickening (cIMT) [10]. The evidence for the presence of accelerated atherosclerosis in SSc is further supported by recent comparative studies indicating similar CV comorbidity burden defined as the occurrence of stroke and myocardial infarction [11] as well as a comparable degree of subclinical atherosclerosis assessed by cIMT and Aix-75 between SSc and rheumatoid arthritis [12]—the prototypic and best-studied systemic rheumatic disorder with regard to high CV risk.
Nailfold video capillaroscopy (NVC) is a non-invasive, easily reproducible imaging study of capillary circulation. NVC is a well-documented, accepted diagnostic technique for microcirculation evaluation, as well as the identification of microvascular invasion that characterizes SSc and other rheumatic diseases [13, 14] and it is currently included in the latest classification criteria for SSc diagnosis [15]. Specific capillary vascular lesions observed in SSc that form a characteristic morphological pattern known as the “scleroderma pattern” were first described four decades ago [16]. Over the last years, the implications of NVC have expanded beyond the diagnostic evaluation of Raynaud’s phenomenon as numerous associations between microvascular alterations and complications of SSc have been established [10], to the point that NVC patterns are considered as potential surrogate markers of disease severity [17]. In the context of atherosclerosis, a handful of small studies have correlated NVC microangiopathic abnormalities with indices of macrovascular disease such as brachial artery endothelial-dependent flow-mediated dilation [18], arterial stiffness [19, 20], and aortic root dilatation [21] in SSc individuals suggesting a possible connection between theoretically distinct aspects of vascular involvement in SSc. However, this question has not been addressed in large studies.
The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between NVC parameters and major parameters of macrovascular function in a well-defined cohort of SSc patients. The association between microcirculatory changes and CV risk algorithms was also assessed.
Materials and methods
Study participants and inclusion/exclusion criteria
Consecutive SSc patients attending the Scleroderma Clinic of the Fourth Department of Internal Medicine, Hippokration General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece, between March 2018 and September 2020 were screened for the study. All patients met the revised EULAR/ACR criteria for the diagnosis of SSc [15]. Exclusion criteria included past diagnosis of cardiovascular disease (CVD) defined as coronary heart disease, stroke or peripheral vascular disease, diabetes mellitus, as well as patients with carotid artery surgical procedures. The study received ethics approval from the Ethics Committee of the School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants according to the Declaration of Helsinki.
Protocol overview
All participants underwent a thorough physical examination and demographic data were collected by a questionnaire. Complete medical history was also recorded which included the duration of the disease; diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary fibrosis, or esophageal motility disorders, as documented by imaging or endoscopic examination, respectively; medication; and traditional CV risk factors. Various hematological and biochemical laboratory parameters such as routine biochemistry and hematology, lipid and bone profile tests, inflammatory markers such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP), immunological markers such as antinuclear antibodies, anti-centromere antibodies, and anti-topoisomerase II antibodies were tested.
For reason of completeness, we estimated CV risk score using Framingham Risk Score (coronary heart disease risk at 10 years) [22], QRISK3 (the most recent version of QRISK used for prediction of cardiovascular disease) [23], and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) algorithm (10-year risk of heart disease or stroke) [24]. Based on the data, their risk scores were calculated. All calculators provided the risk score in numeric values.
Protocol procedures and assessments
BP measurement
Blood pressure was recorded according to 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension [25]. All patients were seated comfortably in a quiet environment for 5 min before beginning BP measurements. Three BP measurements were recorded, 1–2 min apart, and additional measurements only if the first two readings differed by > 10 mmHg. BP was recorded as the average of the last two BP readings. The presence of an auscultatory gap during manual BP measurement—the temporary disappearance of the Korotkoff sounds during cuff deflation—may lead to a potentially important underestimation of SBP if undetected. Thus, electronic oscillometric BP is preferred in SSc patients [26]. BP was measured using Omron HBP-1320, which is validated for professional use [27].
Nailfold video capillaroscopy
The NVC with an Optilia Digital Capillaroscope and a × 200 contact lens was used in all patients. Photos were collected, registered, and analyzed with the OptiPix Capillaroscopy software system. Prior to performing the test, patients were placed in a quiet environment at a temperature of between 20 and 25 °C. For better image analysis, a drop of cedar oil was placed on the fingernails of each finger prior to observation. The examination was performed on all participants by the same physician and the pathological morphological findings were classified in one of the following qualitative patterns: early, active, and late NVC pattern [28]. The “early” pattern was characterized by a few enlarged or giant capillaries, elongation or twisting of capillary brackets without apparent capillary loss, and relatively well-preserved capillary distribution; the “active” pattern was characterized by numerous large capillary vessels, mildly disturbed capillary architecture, and moderate capillary loss; the “late” type was characterized by severe capillary loss with extensive vascular desertification, little or no capillary vessels, and disruption of normal capillary architecture and capillary network [29, 30]. These patterns are supposed to reflect progressing vasculopathy, with the “early” one characterizing the incipient vascular changes, and the “active” and “late” patterns mirroring the extensive capillary disorganization that characterizes the later fibrotic stages of SSc [31]. NVC parameters measured were capillary density (number of capillaries per 1 mm in the distal row of each finger [32]), giant capillaries (homogeneously enlarged capillaries > 50 μm), enlarged capillaries (> 20 μm and ≤ 50 μm), microbleeding, edema, avascular areas (the normal range adopted was 9 capillaries per linear millimeter), ramified capillaries, and bushy and tortuous capillaries [13]. The mean of each capillaroscopic feature was calculated from the sum of consecutive images for each finger. Subsequently, the average values from eight fingers was added together and divided by the number of studied fingers [13]. Furthermore, the mean capillaroscopic skin ulcer risk index (CSURI), according to the formula D × M:N2 (D maximum diameter of giant capillaries, M number of giant capillaries, and N total number of capillaries in the distal row), was calculated for each participant. The images were reviewed by two independent NVC experts (EP and ET) with the latter being blinded to clinical data. The analysis did not reveal any inter-observer variability.
Carotid intima-media thickness
cIMT measurement of 2 common carotid arteries was performed with a 2D ultrasound device (GE Healthcare Ultrasound, Vivid S5, 8L-RS probe, USA), in the common carotid artery between the middle and inner surface of the right and left artery wall, which is represented by a dense double line pattern, by an operator blinded to the NVC findings. The examination and measurement techniques were applied according to standardized protocols [33].
Arterial stiffness
The patients were referred to the Arterial Hypertension Laboratory of the Second Department of the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, where tonometric measurement of arterial stiffness indices was carried out. Office arterial stiffness parameters were evaluated by performing applanation tonometry with the use of a sensitive pencil-type tonometer (SPT-301, Millar Instruments) attached to the SphygmoCor device (AtCor, Sydney, Australia). Oscillometric evaluation of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) at the level of brachial artery, averaged from two measurements per occasion, was used for the calibration of pulse waveforms. Pulse wave analysis was performed from radial artery recordings with the use of a generalized radial-to-aortic transfer function, which provides an accurate estimate of the central arterial pressure waveform. Aortic PWV was measured by recordings of pulse waveforms at the carotid and femoral arteries. Pulse waveforms were referenced to a concurrently recorded ECG, and pulse wave transit time between the subsequent recording sites was calculated from the SphygmoCor software, according to the foot-to-foot time difference between carotid-femoral waveforms. Pulse waveforms were recorder over 10 consecutive heartbeats to cover a complete respiratory cycle. The average of three valid measurements was used in the analysis [34, 35].
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS for Windows (version 22.0 IBM Corp: Armonk, NY, USA). Categorical variables are presented with relevant frequencies and percentages (n, %) and continuous variables are presented as mean values ± standard deviation (SD) or median [interquartile range] according to the normality. The normality of distribution was tested with the Kolmogorov–Smirnov or the Shapiro–Wilk tests. Comparisons for continuous variables were performed with the Student t-test or the Mann–Whitney U test, according to the normality of the distribution. The chi-square or the Fisher’s exact test was used for comparisons between categorical variables. Bivariate correlations between continuous parameters were calculated with the Pearson’s r or the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. p values ≤ 0.05 (two-tailed) were considered statistically significant for all comparisons. Adjustment for confounders assumed to influence the reported associations, namely age, arterial hypertension, and antihypertensive treatment, was conducted via partial correlations. Next, factors associated with the outcome at the p < 0.2 level in univariate analyses were included in a multivariate model as potential confounders. Inter-observer variability for the NVC findings was compared using the Bland–Altman method and for NVC patterns using kappa statistics. Multiple comparisons correction for the correlation analysis was performed using the Benjamini and Hochberg method and a false discovery rate of 50%.
Results
Patient characteristics
A total of 81 SSc patients (6 males) with mean age 55.44 ± 13.40 years were included in the study. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics of the study population are presented in Table 1.
NVC measurements and markers of macrovascular disease
The macro- and microvascular parameters under study in the total population are presented in Table 2. A Bland–Altman plot (Supplementary Fig. 1) showed acceptable agreement between the two investigators for the results of the NVC, with the mean difference being not statistically significant for all the NVC parameters. Moreover, a strong agreement was evidenced between the two investigators regarding the NVC patterns (kappa statistics: 0.981; p < 0.001).
Table 3 depicts the pairwise comparisons for the macrovascular parameters and the trends among the three NVC patterns (early, active, and late). Alx-75 was significantly lower in the early compared to late pattern (30.81 ± 11.59 vs 35.21 ± 7.90, p = 0.003) while higher Alx-75 values were observed across NVC patterns indicating more severe disease (p = 0.027). No significant correlations were found for cIMT and PWV. The results of the bivariate correlations between macro- and microvascular parameters are presented in Table 4. Again, AIx-75 was significantly correlated with capillary density expressed by the number of capillaries and ramifications (r = − 0.262, p = 0.018, and r = 0.420, p = 0.004 respectively) (Fig. 1A). With regard to the association between PWV and the capillaroscopic parameters, a significant correlation was noted only with the number of enlarged loops (p = 0.024). Otherwise, no associations between other indices of morphological (cIMT) or functional parameters (PWV) of atherosclerosis were noticed.
AIx-75 was significantly associated with age (r = 0.283, p = 0.010). In addition to this, a borderline association between Alx-75 and antihypertensive treatment with angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) was observed (r = 0.215, p = 0.054). However, adjustment for confounding variables, including age and antihypertensive treatment with ARBs, performed through a multivariate regression analysis was not found to affect the correlation between Alx-75 and capillary density, demonstrating an independent association between Alx-75 and the number of capillary ramifications (beta = 0.281, t = 2.33, p = 0.006).
NVC measurements and central and peripheral hemodynamics
In between-group comparisons, SSc patients with early and active NVC pattern had significantly lower augmentation pressure (AP) compared to late pattern (12.76 ± 6.51 vs 18.19 ± 9.74, p = 0.019, and 12.76 ± 6.51 vs 18.19 ± 9.74, p = 0.016 respectively), whereas central pulse pressure (CPP) was marginally lower (p = 0.067) (Table 3). In total, a significant trend was noted for CPP and AP amongst capillaroscopic patterns indicating progressive microvasculopathy (p = 0.046 and p = 0.017, respectively).
Correlation analysis between capillaroscopic abnormalities and hemodynamics revealed negative correlation between reduced capillaries and AP (r = − 0.249, p = 0.025). DBP and cDBP were associated with microbleeding areas (r = 0.028, p = 0.041; r = 0.223, p = 0.046; respectively). The number of ramified capillaries were observed to have a significant positive correlation with cSBP (r = 0.223, p = 0.045). All statistically significant correlations were to the same direction after multiple comparisons correction (Table 4). Nevertheless, after inserting cSBP in a multivariate model along with Aix-75, age, hypertension, and antihypertensive treatment, Aix-75 was once again the only parameter found to be independently associated with capillary ramifications (beta = 0.322, t = 2.534, p = 0.004).
NVC measurements and CV score algorithms
CV risk estimations by Framingham Risk Score and ASCVD were progressively increasing in SSc patients with an early, active, or late NVC pattern of microangiopathy (p = 0.023, p = 0.019 respectively) (Fig. 2). Patients presenting active pattern in NVC had significantly lower scores compared to those with late pattern in all risk algorithms evaluated (Framingham Risk Score 2.99 ± 2.72 vs 6.36 ± 5.65 p = 0.027, QRISK3 7.80 ± 6.62 vs 12.57 ± 8.29 p = 0.029, ASCVD Risk 5.63 ± 4.41 vs 12.09 ± 9.90 p = 0.030) (Table 3). QRISK3 and ASCVD were numerically lower in the early compared with the late pattern (8.33 ± 5.87 vs 12.57 ± 8.29 p = 0.063, 6.99 ± 7.18 vs 12.09 ± 9.90 p = 0.082, respectively). As shown in Table 4, QRISK3 and ASCVD were negatively correlated with the number of capillaries (r = − 0.231, p = 0.048; r = − 0.260, p = 0.038); i.e., the lower the capillary density, the higher the risk of cardiovascular events. Moreover, QRISK3 was significantly correlated with the number of avascular areas/mm (r = 0.291, p = 0.012), indicating a strong association between desertification in NVC and higher cardiovascular risk.
Discussion
This cross-sectional single-center study examined the potential association between NVC measurements and indices of arteriosclerosis, central/peripheral hemodynamics, and CV risk algorithms in SSc patients. Our findings demonstrate that morphological markers of microcirculatory dysregulation, namely reduced capillary density and increased capillary dimensions (e.g., ramifications), are positively correlated with increased Alx-75 suggesting a relationship between large vessel dysfunction and capillary rarefaction. In addition, worsening phases of SSc-related microangiopathy characterized by late NVC pattern were related with higher values of central pulse pressure, arterial stiffness, and CV risk scores. Overall, the results of the study reveal a linear association between progressing peripheral microvascular damage and increased CV disease risk associated with accelerated atherosclerosis in individuals suffering from SSc.
The role of macrovascular and microvascular involvement in the development of CV disease remains a challenge in SSc, as endothelial dysfunction represents not only an atherosclerotic process but also the main event in the pathogenesis of the disease itself, leading to systemic impairment of microcirculation including coronary small vessels [36, 37]. For example, avascular areas in the nailfold capillaries have been correlated with coronary microvascular dysfunction assessed by coronary flow reserve suggesting that microvessel damage in different anatomical areas might be driven by similar mechanisms of vascular injury [38]. With regard to large vessels, a number of studies have established notable associations between various indices of macrovascular disease and NVC changes observed in different stages of SSc microangiopathy. In particular, structural changes of palmar digital arteries assessed by color Doppler ultrasonography [39], abnormal peripheral blood perfusion in laser speckle contrast analysis [40], blunted response to flow-mediated dilatation of brachial arteries [18], and increased systemic arterial stiffness [20] have been found to correlate with the progression across capillaroscopy patterns from “early” to “late” according to their severity.
The present study concurs with previous observations and further expands their findings by demonstrating significant relationships between advanced microcirculatory changes and several aspects of macrovascular atherosclerotic disease such as arterial stiffening, CV risk scores, and central hemodynamics. Our findings support the hypothesis that micro- and macrovascular dysfunction in SSc are potentially interrelated and indicate the presence of generalized vascular dysregulation which in turn may contribute to the increased risk for CV disease among SSc patients.
Previous studies have reported that Alx-75, a marker of arterial stiffening and a predictor of CV disease morbidity, is impaired in patients with SSc [41, 42]. Alx-75 derives from the ascending aortic pressure waveform which is closely related to functional and structural changes of small arteries [43]. Subsequently, reduced pulsatility and blood flow coupled with increased vasoconstrictor tone and rarefaction of the small digital arteries in the late stages of SSc microangiopathy could be associated with abnormal aortic elastic properties and peripheral artery resistance reflected in higher Alx-75 values. On the other hand, stiffening of the aorta increases pressure and flow pulsatility which may transmit distally and further enhance microcirculation damage in peripheral vascular trees [44]. To lend more support to this complex interrelation, a recent study found significant associations between aortic root dilatation assessed by echocardiography and severity of microvasculopathy in SSc patients [21]. Taken all together, it seems that functional and morphological alterations of large vessels are correlated with the diminution of capillary density and the extent of peripheral microvascular injury in SSc.
The relationship between CV disease and microvascular rarefaction associated with anomalies of capillary morphology appears to widen beyond the spectrum SSc and rheumatic diseases. An increasing number of studies over the recent years have demonstrated significant correlation between NVC changes and arterial stiffness, hypertension, disease severity, and CV disease in different disease settings, namely chronic renal failure [45], renal cancer [46], pulmonary arterial hypertension [47, 48], diabetes mellitus respectively [49], as well as patients with paraneoplastic Raynaud’s phenomenon [50]. As a result, NVC emerges as a novel tool for the assessment of peripheral microcirculation in several conditions but the validation of the findings in other diseases requires extensive research with pre-defined end points.
The performance of CV risk calculators developed for the general population in predicting future CV events in patients with systemic rheumatic diseases is poor as they appear to underestimate the risk, especially in rheumatoid arthritis [51]. In the context of SSc, only Ozen et al. investigated whether subclinical atherosclerosis could be detected with SCORE (Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation) and QRISK I in a small number of SSc patients (n = 19) and yielded negative results [52]. In the current study, we found significant correlations between the degree of progression of microvasculopathy with increased scores of a broad spectrum of CV risk algorithms such as Framingham Risk Score, QRISK3, and ASCVD. This novel finding may provide further insight into the association between CV risk and peripheral microcirculatory changes and CV disease. Although these observations have to be confirmed in larger studies, the already reported association between progressive NVC patterns and internal organ involvement may suggest that the degree of microvasculopathy may also indicate patients at higher risk for CV events.
The main limitation of our study is the cross-sectional design which precludes temporal relationships and causal associations to be observed. Previous studies reported that antihypertensive drugs may mitigate Alx-75 abnormalities but treatment with such regimens did not appear to affect the results of the analysis. We also acknowledge that the associations established—particularly between Alx-75 and NVC patterns—are not robust enough to draw definite conclusions. On the other hand, the findings of the study may provide the rational for population-based, longitudinal studies with hard CV disease endpoints to determine the link between CV risk and microangiopathy in SSc. However, this is the largest study to date investigating the relationship between NVC alterations and subclinical atherosclerosis in SSc. Sample sizes of the NVC pattern groups may be considered relatively small, but the inflated type 2 error rate in the corresponding comparisons may be considered marginal, given that all relevant results were to the same direction. In addition, NVC was conducted in all fingers except thumbs and the acquisition of two adjacent images from each finger including qualitative and semi-quantitative assessment performed based on a validated algorithm proposed by Smith et al. [53]. Finally, we utilized an extensive panel of macro- and microvasculature assessments in a real-life population representative of average SSc patients attending scleroderma clinics.
In conclusion, our study points towards an association between CV risk and macrovascular atherosclerotic disease with worsening stages of peripheral microcirculation in patients with SSc. Whether NVC measurements could modify CV risk assessment in SSc patients should be determined in future studies.
Data availability
Available on request.
Code availability
Available on request.
References
Denton CP, Khanna D (2017) Systemic sclerosis. Lancet 390(10103):1685–1699. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30933-9
Poudel DR, Jayakumar D, Danve A, Sehra ST, Derk CT (2018) Determinants of mortality in systemic sclerosis: a focused review. Rheumatol Int 38(10):1847–1858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-017-3826-y
Tyndall AJ, Bannert B, Vonk M et al (2010) Causes and risk factors for death in systemic sclerosis: a study from the EULAR Scleroderma Trials and Research (EUSTAR) database. Ann Rheum Dis 69(10):1809–1815. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2009.114264
Derk CT, Jimenez SA (2003) Systemic sclerosis: current views of its pathogenesis. Autoimmun Rev 2(4):181–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1568-9972(03)00005-3
Pagkopoulou E, Poutakidou M, Garyfallos A, Kitas G, Dimitroulas T (2017) Cardiovascular risk in systemic sclerosis: micro- and macro-vascular involvement. Indian Journal of Rheumatology 12(6):211–217. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-3698.219080
Frech T, Walker AE, Barrett-O’Keefe Z, Hopkins PN, Richardson RS, Wray DW, Donato AJ (2015) Systemic sclerosis induces pronounced peripheral vascular dysfunction characterized by blunted peripheral vasoreactivity and endothelial dysfunction. Clin Rheumatol 34(5):905–913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-014-2834-5
Aviña-Zubieta JA, Man A, Yurkovich M, Huang K, Sayre EC, Choi HK (2016) Early cardiovascular disease after the diagnosis of systemic sclerosis. Am J Med 129(3):324–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.10.037
Piccione MC, Bagnato G, Zito C, Di Bella G, Caliri A, Catalano M, Longordo C, Oreto G, Bagnato G, Carerj S (2011) Early identification of vascular damage in patients with systemic sclerosis. Angiology 62(4):338–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003319710387918
Liu J, Zhang Y, Cao TS, Duan YY, Yuan LJ, Yang YL, Li Y, Yao L (2011) Preferential macrovasculopathy in systemic sclerosis detected by regional pulse wave velocity from wave intensity analysis: comparisons of local and regional arterial stiffness parameters in cases and controls. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 63(4):579–587. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20306
Au K, Singh MK, Bodukam V, Bae S, Maranian P, Ogawa R, Spiegel B, McMahon M, Hahn B, Khanna D (2011) Atherosclerosis in systemic sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arthritis Rheum 63(7):2078–2090. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.30380
Panopoulos S, Tektonidou M, Drosos AA et al (2018) Prevalence of comorbidities in systemic sclerosis versus rheumatoid arthritis: a comparative, multicenter, matched-cohort study. Arthritis Res Ther 20(1):267. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-018-1771-0
Dimitroulas T, Baniotopoulos P, Pagkopoulou E, Soulaidopoulos S, Nightingale P, Sandoo A, Karagiannis A, Douglas K, Sachinidis A, Garyfallos A, Kitas G (2020) Subclinical atherosclerosis in systemic sclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis: a comparative matched-cohort study. Rheumatol Int 40(12):1997–2004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-020-04677-3
Etehad Tavakol M, Fatemi A, Karbalaie A, Emrani Z, Erlandsson BE (2015) Nailfold capillaroscopy in rheumatic diseases: which parameters should be evaluated? Biomed Res Int 2015:974530. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/974530
Bernardino V, Rodrigues A, Lladó A, Panarra A (2020) Nailfold capillaroscopy and autoimmune connective tissue diseases in patients from a Portuguese nailfold capillaroscopy clinic. Rheumatol Int 40(2):295–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-019-04427-0
van den Hoogen F, Khanna D, Fransen J et al (2013) 2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: an American college of rheumatology/European league against rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 72(11):1747–1755. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204424
Maricq HR, LeRoy EC (1973) Patterns of finger capillary abnormalities in connective tissue disease by “wide-field” microscopy. Arthritis Rheum 16(5):619–628. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780160506
Soulaidopoulos S, Triantafyllidou E, Garyfallos A, Kitas GD, Dimitroulas T (2017) The role of nailfold capillaroscopy in the assessment of internal organ involvement in systemic sclerosis: a critical review. Autoimmun Rev 16(8):787–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2017.05.019
Rollando D, Bezante GP, Sulli A, Balbi M, Panico N, Pizzorni C, Negrini S, Brunelli C, Barsotti A, Cutolo M, Indiveri F, Ghio M (2010) Brachial artery endothelial-dependent flow-mediated dilation identifies early-stage endothelial dysfunction in systemic sclerosis and correlates with nailfold microvascular impairment. J Rheumatol 37(6):1168–1173. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.091116
Jung KH, Lim MJ, Kwon SR, Kim D, Joo K, Park W (2015) Nailfold capillary microscopic changes and arterial stiffness in Korean systemic sclerosis patients. Mod Rheumatol 25(2):328–331. https://doi.org/10.3109/14397595.2014.881955
Soulaidopoulos S, Pagkopoulou E, Katsiki N, Triantafyllidou E, Karagiannis A, Garyfallos A, Kitas GD, Dimitroulas T (2019) Arterial stiffness correlates with progressive nailfold capillary microscopic changes in systemic sclerosis: results from a cross-sectional study. Arthritis Res Ther 21(1):253. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-019-2051-3
Colaci M, Dal Bosco Y, Schinocca C, Ronsivalle G, Guggino G, De Andres I, Russo AA, Sambataro D, Sambataro G, Malatino L (2020) Aortic root dilation in associated with the reduction in capillary density observed at nailfold capillaroscopy in SSc patients. Clin Rheumatol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-020-05201-5
D’Agostino RB Sr, Vasan RS, Pencina MJ, Wolf PA, Cobain M, Massaro JM, Kannel WB (2008) General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 117(6):743–753. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.107.699579
Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C, Brindle P (2017) Development and validation of QRISK3 risk prediction algorithms to estimate future risk of cardiovascular disease: prospective cohort study. BMJ 357:j2099. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j2099
Goff DC Jr, Lloyd-Jones DM, Bennett G et al (2014) 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 129(25 Suppl 2):S49-73. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000437741.48606.98
Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W et al (2018) 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension: The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension. J Hypertens 36(10):1953–2041. https://doi.org/10.1097/hjh.0000000000001940
Frech TM, Penrod J, Battistone MJ, Sawitzke AD, Stults BM (2012) The prevalence and clinical correlates of an auscultatory gap in systemic sclerosis patients. Int J Rheumatol 2012:590845. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/590845
Saito K, Hishiki Y, Takahashi H (2020) Validation of the Omron HBP-1320 for professional use according to the ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060–2: 2013 protocol and the 2010 revision of the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol. Blood Press Monit 25(3):162–166. https://doi.org/10.1097/mbp.0000000000000437
Cutolo M, Sulli A, Smith V (2010) Assessing microvascular changes in systemic sclerosis diagnosis and management. Nat Rev Rheumatol 6(10):578–587. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2010.104
Cutolo M, Sulli A, Pizzorni C, Accardo S (2000) Nailfold videocapillaroscopy assessment of microvascular damage in systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol 27(1):155–160
Smith V, Vanhaecke A, Herrick AL et al (2019) Fast track algorithm: how to differentiate a “scleroderma pattern” from a “non-scleroderma pattern.” Autoimmun Rev 18(11):102394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2019.102394
Caramaschi P, Canestrini S, Martinelli N, Volpe A, Pieropan S, Ferrari M, Bambara LM, Carletto A, Biasi D (2007) Scleroderma patients nailfold videocapillaroscopic patterns are associated with disease subset and disease severity. Rheumatology (Oxford) 46(10):1566–1569. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kem190
Hofstee HM, Serné EH, Roberts C, Hesselstrand R, Scheja A, Moore TL, Wildt M, Manning JB, Vonk Noordegraaf A, Voskuyl AE, Herrick AL (2012) A multicentre study on the reliability of qualitative and quantitative nail-fold videocapillaroscopy assessment. Rheumatology (Oxford) 51(4):749–755. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/ker403
Roman MJ, Naqvi TZ, Gardin JM, Gerhard-Herman M, Jaff M, Mohler E (2006) Clinical application of noninvasive vascular ultrasound in cardiovascular risk stratification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Vascular Medicine and Biology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 19(8):943–954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2006.04.020
DeLoach SS, Townsend RR (2008) Vascular stiffness: its measurement and significance for epidemiologic and outcome studies. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 3(1):184–192. https://doi.org/10.2215/cjn.03340807
Townsend RR, Wilkinson IB, Schiffrin EL, Avolio AP, Chirinos JA, Cockcroft JR, Heffernan KS, Lakatta EG, McEniery CM, Mitchell GF, Najjar SS, Nichols WW, Urbina EM, Weber T (2015) Recommendations for improving and standardizing vascular research on arterial stiffness: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Hypertension 66(3):698–722. https://doi.org/10.1161/hyp.0000000000000033
Dimitroulas T, Giannakoulas G, Karvounis H, Garyfallos A, Settas L, Kitas GD (2014) Micro- and macrovascular treatment targets in scleroderma heart disease. Curr Pharm Des 20(4):536–544. https://doi.org/10.2174/13816128113199990555
Kavian N, Batteux F (2015) Macro- and microvascular disease in systemic sclerosis. Vascul Pharmacol 71:16–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vph.2015.05.015
Zanatta E, Famoso G, Boscain F, Montisci R, Pigatto E, Polito P, Schiavon F, Iliceto S, Cozzi F, Doria A, Tona F (2019) Nailfold avascular score and coronary microvascular dysfunction in systemic sclerosis: a newsworthy association. Autoimmun Rev 18(2):177–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2018.09.002
Rosato E, Gigante A, Barbano B, Cianci R, Molinaro I, Pisarri S, Salsano F (2011) In systemic sclerosis macrovascular damage of hands digital arteries correlates with microvascular damage. Microvasc Res 82(3):410–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mvr.2011.07.009
Ruaro B, Sulli A, Alessandri E, Pizzorni C, Ferrari G, Cutolo M (2014) Laser speckle contrast analysis: a new method to evaluate peripheral blood perfusion in systemic sclerosis patients. Ann Rheum Dis 73(6):1181–1185. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203514
Bartoloni E, Pucci G, Cannarile F, Battista F, Alunno A, Giuliani M, Cafaro G, Gerli R, Schillaci G (2016) Central hemodynamics and arterial stiffness in systemic sclerosis. Hypertension 68(6):1504–1511. https://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.116.08345
Cypiene A, Laucevicius A, Venalis A, Dadoniene J, Ryliskyte L, Petrulioniene Z, Kovaite M, Gintautas J (2008) The impact of systemic sclerosis on arterial wall stiffness parameters and endothelial function. Clin Rheumatol 27(12):1517–1522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-008-0958-1
Muiesan ML, Salvetti M, Rizzoni D, Paini A, Agabiti-Rosei C, Aggiusti C, Bertacchini F, Stassaldi D, Gavazzi A, Porteri E, De Ciuceis C, Agabiti-Rosei E (2013) Pulsatile hemodynamics and microcirculation: evidence for a close relationship in hypertensive patients. Hypertension 61(1):130–136. https://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.111.00006
van Sloten TT, Czernichow S, Houben AJ et al (2015) Association between arterial stiffness and skin microvascular function: the SUVIMAX2 Study and The Maastricht Study. Am J Hypertens 28(7):868–876. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/hpu246
Schoina M, Loutradis C, Theodorakopoulou M, Dimitroulas T, Triantafillidou E, Doumas M, Karagiannis A, Garyfallos A, Papagianni A, Sarafidis P (2021) The presence of diabetes mellitus further impairs structural and functional capillary density in patients with chronic kidney disease. Microcirculation 28(2):e12665. https://doi.org/10.1111/micc.12665
Dalbeni A, Ciccarese C, Bevilacqua M et al (2018) Effects of antiangiogenetic drugs on microcirculation and macrocirculation in patients with advanced-stage renal cancer. Cancers (Basel) 11(1):30. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11010030
Arvanitaki A, Giannakoulas G, Triantafyllidou E, Feloukidis C, Boutou AK, Garyfallos A, Karvounis H, Dimitroulas T (2021) Peripheral microangiopathy in precapillary pulmonary hypertension: a nailfold video capillaroscopy prospective study. Respir Res 22(1):27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-021-01622-1
Arvanitaki A, Giannakoulas G, Triantafyllidou E, Karvounis H, Dimitroulas T (2020) Peripheral microangiopathy in patients with precapillary pulmonary hypertension: correlation with cardiac function and patients’ functional capacity. Study Design and Rationale. Mediterr J Rheumatol 31(3):369–373. https://doi.org/10.31138/mjr.31.3.369
Lisco G, Cicco G, Cignarelli A, Garruti G, Laviola L, Giorgino F (2018) Computerized video-capillaroscopy alteration related to diabetes mellitus and its complications. Adv Exp Med Biol 1072:363–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91287-5_58
Lambova S, Müller-Ladner U (2013) Capillaroscopic pattern in paraneoplastic Raynaud’s phenomenon. Rheumatol Int 33(6):1597–1599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-010-1715-8
Wibetoe G, Sexton J, Ikdahl E et al (2020) Prediction of cardiovascular events in rheumatoid arthritis using risk age calculations: evaluation of concordance across risk age models. Arthritis Res Ther 22(1):90. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-020-02178-z
Ozen G, Inanc N, Unal AU, Korkmaz F, Sunbul M, Ozmen M, Akar S, Deniz R, Donmez S, Pamuk ON, Atagunduz P, Tigen K, Direskeneli H (2016) Subclinical atherosclerosis in systemic sclerosis: not less frequent than rheumatoid arthritis and not detected with cardiovascular risk indices. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 68(10):1538–1546. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.22852
Smith V, Herrick AL, Ingegnoli F et al (2020) Standardisation of nailfold capillaroscopy for the assessment of patients with Raynaud’s phenomenon and systemic sclerosis. Autoimmun Rev 19(3):102458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102458
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Ethics approval provided by Hippokration Hospital.
Consent to participate
All participants gave their written informed consent according to the Declaration of Helsinki.
Consent for publication
The authors have consented to the publication of the paper.
Disclosures
None.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pagkopoulou, E., Soulaidopoulos, S., Triantafyllidou, E. et al. Peripheral microcirculatory abnormalities are associated with cardiovascular risk in systemic sclerosis: a nailfold video capillaroscopy study. Clin Rheumatol 40, 4957–4968 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-021-05795-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-021-05795-4