Abstract
To identify risk factors for the recurrence of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in patients with polymyositis (PM)/dermatomyositis (DM). Forty-four PM/DM-ILD patients who had been treated with glucocorticoid and/or immunosuppressive agents as a remission induction therapy were enrolled. The patients were first classified into two groups: the early recurrence group that recurred within 52 weeks, and the non-early recurrence group, which was further classified into the late recurrence group that recurred after 52 weeks, and the non-recurrence group. The characteristics and treatment regimen between the groups were compared. Recurrence was experienced by 15 of 44 patients. The pulmonary vital capacity of the early recurrence group was significantly lower than the non-early recurrence group (46 vs 76%, p = 0.0003), and 60% of the early recurrence group was treated with glucocorticoid alone as a maintenance therapy in contrast to 10% in the non-early recurrence group (p = 0.004). The late recurrence was only related with a positivity for autoantibodies against aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (anti-ARS antibodies, odds ratio 8.4, p = 0.02), but calcineurin inhibitors tended to decrease the relapse incidence in patients with anti-ARS antibodies. Low pulmonary vital capacity at disease onset and anti-ARS antibodies positivity are the risk factors for the recurrence of ILD with PM/DM. Calcinuerin inhibitors are important in preventing relapse.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Polymyositis (PM) and dermatomyositis (DM) are characterized by a systemic inflammation of proximal skeletal muscles with or without skin involvement [1]. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is the most common, non-musculoskeletal manifestation of PM/DM, and is identified in 25 to 75% of patients. ILD with these inflammatory myopathies can be refractory to treatment, progress rapidly, and result in high mortality [2]. Immediate intensive immunosuppressive therapy, including a combination of high doses of glucocorticoids and immunosuppressive agents, is currently considered necessary to induce remission at present.
Since recurrence can cause acute life-threatening pulmonary inflammation, and may result in progression of pulmonary fibrosis, maintaining ILD in remission is critical. Although some studies have reported that patients with anti-aminoacil synthetase autoantibodies (anti-ARS) are inclined to recur, [3, 4] recurrence of ILD is usually unpredictable and little is known about its relevant risk factors.
The aim of the study was to identify risk factors for recurrence of ILD in patients with PM/DM.
Materials and methods
Patients and data collection
We retrospectively reviewed records of patients with PM/DM who received glucocorticoids and/or immunosuppressive agents in Keio University Hospital, from January 2002 to August 2015 as remission induction therapy for ILD. The diagnosis of PM/DM was made according to specific criteria [1, 5]. Information, including age, sex, smoking history, disease duration, autoantibodies, laboratory data, and pulmonary function tests at disease onset, treatment regimens, and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) findings were collected. Anti-ARS antibodies were confirmed by immunoprecipitation assay [6].
We defined induction therapy as treatment provided for ILD within 6 months from the initiation of drug therapy, and maintenance therapy as treatment after 6 months.
The study was approved by the ethics committee (Ethics Committee of Keio University School of Medicine, approval number: 20110136). Informed consent from the patients was waived according to the regulations in Japan.
Recurrence definition
Based on the criteria for the IPF Clinical Research Network, [7] recurrence of ILD was defined as exacerbation of interstitial pulmonary findings in a HRCT assessed by both radiologists and rheumatologists with worsening respiratory symptoms, resulting in re-induction therapy with the increase in glucocorticoid dose. Culture of sputum or bronchoalveolar lavage in all patients showed no evidence of infection. Other diseases such as drug induced pneumonitis, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, or heart failure were excluded by patients’ history and clinical course, and physical and serological examinations.
The recurrence within 52 weeks of induction therapy was defined as early recurrence and a recurrence after 52 weeks as late recurrence. In the analyses, patients were firstly classified into the early recurrence group and the non-early recurrence group. Subsequently, the non-early recurrence group was classified into the late recurrence group and the non-recurrence group. We reviewed patients’ charts from the beginning of induction therapy to their last visit on August, 2015. Observation period was defined in this study as the duration from the initiation of induction therapy to the recurrence of ILD in patients who had recurrence or to the last follow-up in patients who did not have recurrence. Follow-up period was the duration from the beginning of induction therapy to the last visit in all patients.
Statistics
Mean or median values and proportions were compared between two groups using the Mann-Whitney U test, Student’s t test, or chi-square test. Recurrence-free survival was depicted with Kaplan-Meier method, and in comparisons of four groups the Logrank test was used to compare the differences between each two groups with Bonferroni correction. The annual risk was calculated by one-sample sign test. Odds ratio was calculated by univariate logistic regression analysis. A p value of < 0.05 was regarded as significant. All statistical analyses were performed with JMP Software 11.2.0 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
Results
Patient flow and recurrence rates
Flowchart for patient selection is shown in Fig. 1a. Of the 46 patients with PM/DM-ILD, two patients were excluded (death or lost-to-follow-up within 1 month), and 44 patients were enrolled in the study. All 44 patients underwent HRCT both before and after induction therapy, which confirmed improvement of ILD.
During the observation period (6.6 ± 6.5 years), 15 patients experienced recurrence of ILD (34%). The overall recurrence rate was 5 per 100 person-years (Fig. 1b). The median time from the induction therapy to the recurrence was 152 (41–271) weeks. Five patients recurred within 52 weeks (early recurrence group), and nine patients after 52 weeks (late recurrence group). Recurrence rates were 2 per 100 person-years in the early recurrence group, and 3 per 100 person-years in the late recurrence group. The annual risk of recurrence was higher for the first year than for the subsequent observation period (0.13 vs, 0.05 p = 0.07), although no statistical difference was found.
Factors relevant to the early recurrence
Demographic characteristics at initiation of induction therapy and the treatment regimens were compared between the early recurrence and the non-early recurrence groups, and then, between the late recurrence and the non-recurrence groups (Table 1).
Between the early recurrence group and the non-early recurrence group, no differences were identified in demographics or laboratory tests, including markers reflecting the severity of ILD (serum C-reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase, Krebs von den Lungen-6, creatine kinase and PaO2 (arterial pressure of oxygen)/FiO2 (fraction of inspiratory oxygen) ratio). HRCT findings at disease onset were also summarized in Table 1 [8, 9]. No statistic difference was found in HRCT findings between the early recurrence group and the non-early recurrence group. In the early recurrence group, percentage vital capacity (%VC) at the initiation of induction therapy was significantly lower when compared to the non-early recurrence group (46 vs. 76%, p = 0.0003). While the induction therapy regimen was not different between the two groups, 60% of patients in the early recurrence group were treated with glucocorticoids monotherapy without immunosuppressive agents for the maintenance, compared to 10% of the non-early recurrence group (p = 0.004). In 80% of patients in the early recurrence group, the glucocorticoid dose was decreased by 50% within 8 weeks, compared to 38% of the non-early recurrence group (p = 0.07). Univariate logistic regression analysis identified low %VC at induction therapy (odds ratio 0.6, 95% confidential interval 0.3–0.9, p < 0.001) and glucocorticoid maintenance monotherapy (odds ratio 13.1, 95% confidential interval 1.7–127.4, p = 0.01) as risk factors for early recurrence of ILD.
Factors relevant to the late recurrence
Table 1 also compares the characteristics between the late recurrence and non-recurrence groups. Autoantibodies against aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (anti-ARS) were significantly more frequent in the late recurrence group, when compared to the non-recurrence group (90 vs. 52%, p = 0.03). In the non-recurrence group, more patients were treated with calcineurin inhibitors combined with glucocorticoids, when compared to the late recurrence group although it was not statistically significant (75.9 vs. 50%, p = 0.13). Univariate logistic regression analysis showed an odds ratio of recurrence of 8.4 (95% confidential interval 1.3–165.2, p = 0.02) for patients positive for anti-ARS antibodies.
Figure 2 shows the ILD recurrence-free rates in patients with PM/DM analyzed by the Kaplan-Mayer method. Patients were divided into four groups based on the use of calcineurin inhibitors and the presence of anti-ARS antibodies. Patients positive for anti-ARS antibodies, not treated with calcineurin inhibitors, had trend to recur compared to other groups (p = 0.04). Although the significance of difference disappeared after Bonferroni correction (p = 0.07) presumably because of the small number of patients, those data suggests that calcineurin inhibitors may help to prevent recurrence.
Cases with two times recurrence
We identified six patients who recurred again after the second induction therapy (Table 2). They were all positive for anti-ARS. Although most of them had received intensive induction therapy and continuous calcineurin inhibitors, recurrence still occurred when glucocorticoids were decreased to 5–13 mg /day, suggesting that a more innovative treatment strategy is necessary to prevent recurrence of ILD in a part of patients with anti-ARS antibodies. We did not identify specific characteristics of twice recurrent patients in spite of comparable observation period (352 weeks for one recurrence vs 233 weeks for twice recurrence, p = 0.29).
Discussion
This study demonstrates that ILD for patients with PM/DM recurred at the rate of 5 per 100 person-years, and risk factors for recurrence within 52 weeks were low %VC at the time of induction therapy and glucocorticoid monotherapy, whereas the risk for recurrence during the long-term was the presence of anti-ARS antibodies. Calcineurin inhibitors could prevent relapse in patients with anti-ARS antibodies.
The incidence of ILD in patients with PM/DM varies between 25 and 75% depending on the definition of ILD. However, the recurrence rate of ILD after improvement, or during non-progressive status, is unclear. A cross-sectional study reported that eight of 45 patients (17.8%) had a recurrence of ILD [3]. A retrospective longitudinal study of 49 patients, with the median observation period of 25.7 months, showed approximately 30% of patients treated with tacrolimus died or had recurrence, compared to 55% in the conventional therapy group [4]. The recurrence rates in our long-term, longitudinal study were consistent with those findings; however, a larger observational cohort study is needed to clarify the incidence rate of the recurrence.
Recurrence within 52 weeks following induction therapy was related to low %VC at induction therapy and glucocorticoid maintenance monotherapy Recurrence may also be related to the rapid reduction in glucocorticoid dose. As previously reported, lower %VC predicts unfavorable outcome, [10] and reflects the severity of ILD [11]. In our study, patients with low %VC at disease onset were more likely to have recurrence of ILD early after remission induction, suggesting that ILD with low %VC may need more intensive induction therapy. It is not surprising that glucocorticoid monotherapy dose is related to recurrence within 52 weeks, since the importance of combination immunosuppressant therapy, including calcineurin inhibitors, cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, and methotrexate, has been reported [12,13,14]. Moreover, the relationship of rapid decrease in glucocorticoid dose with early re-worsening of ILD indicates that it could be regarded as remission induction failure rather than recurrence in spite of improved finding by HRCT, meaning subsiding inflammation in the lungs requires some time.
Recurrence of ILD after 52 weeks is associated only with the presence of anti-ARS antibodies. Our results, suggesting that maintenance therapy with calcineurin inhibitors can inhibit recurrence of ILD, is in agreement with previous clinical and basic science studies [4, 12, 15]. A retrospective study showed that the addition of tacrolimus to conventional therapy significantly improved the prognosis [4]. Calcineurin inhibitors inhibit T cell proliferation by inhibiting IL-2 production, and targeting CD8 T cells could be a reasonable strategy for ILD in PM/DM as the local CD4/CD8 ratio in bronchoalveolar fluid was low in ILD with PM/DM [16]. Six patients positive for anti-ARS antibodies, however, experienced repetitive recurrence, despite the combination calcineurin inhibitors with glucocorticoids. While calcineurin inhibitors are effective to decrease recurrence risk, a part of patients are still at risk of recurrence after glucocorticoid tapering. Further studies are required to identify more effective treatment strategies to prevent those recurrence of ILD.
This study had a longer observation period than previous studies. Although the frequent recurrence of interstitial lung disease with PM/DM is problematic, little is known about the long-term information about it because of the difficulty in collecting those rare diseases. This long-term observational study is valuable. This study has added evidence on the importance of concomitant use of calcineurin inhibitors. The necessity of establishing innovative treatment strategy is revealed by showing that a part of patients are still at risk of recurrence despite the use of calcineurin inhibitors. This study has some limitations. First, this is a single-center, retrospective study with a small sample size. Although the patient number was rather large for these rare diseases, the small sample size could result in bias and obscure statistical significance. Second, this analysis included patients with PM, DM, and amyopathic DM as a single group, despite the clinical and pathological differences because the small sample size hampered the stratified analyses. Third, all patients were Japanese, and a specific genetic background may affect clinical and therapeutic outcomes.
In conclusion, the use of immunosuppressive agents such as calcineurin inhibitors is vital to manage ILD in patients with PM/DM, especially in patients with low %VC at disease onset and positive for anti-ARS antibodies. Calcineurin inhibitors can be favorable in maintenance therapy; however, inhibiting recurrence in a long time still needs innovative treatment strategy.
References
Bohan A, Peter JB (1975) Polymyositis and dermatomyositis (first of two parts). N Engl J Med 292:344–347
Chen IJ, Jan Wu YJ, Lin CW, Fan KW, Leu SF, Ho HH et al (2009) Interstitial lung disease in polymyositis and dermatomyositis. Clin Rheumatol 28:639–646
Yoshifuji H, Fujii T, Kobayashi S, Imura Y, Fujita Y, Kawabata D et al (2006) Anti-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase antibodies in clinical course prediction of interstitial lung disease complicated with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Autoimmunity 39:233–241
Kurita T, Yasuda S, Oba K, Odani T, Kono M, Otomo K et al (2015) The efficacy of tacrolimus in patients with interstitial lung diseases complicated with polymyositis or dermatomyositis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 54:39–44
Sontheimer RD (2002) Would a new name hasten the acceptance of amyopathic dermatomyositis (dermatomyositis sine myositis) as a distinctive subset within the idiopathic inflammatory dermatomyopathies spectrum of clinical illness? J Am Acad Dermatol 46:626–636
Ohosone Y, Ishida M, Takahashi Y, Matsumura M, Hirakata M, Kawahara Y et al (1998) Spectrum and clinical significance of autoantibodies against transfer RNA. Arthritis Rheum 41:1625–1631
Collard HR, Moore BB, Flaherty KR, Brown KK, Kaner RJ, King TE Jr et al (2007) Acute exacerbations of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 176:636–643
Raghu G, Collard HR, Egan JJ, Martinez FJ, Behr J, Brown KK et al (2011) An official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT statement: idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 183:788–824
Travis WD, Costabel U, Hansell DM, King TE Jr, Lynch DA, Nicholson AG et al (2013) An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: update of the international multidisciplinary classification of the idiopathic interstitial pneumonias. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 188:733–748
Fujisawa T, Hozumi H, Kono M, Enomoto N, Hashimoto D, Nakamura Y et al (2014) Prognostic factors for myositis-associated interstitial lung disease. PLoS One 9(6):e98824
Ley B, Ryerson CJ, Vittinghoff E, Ryu JH, Tomassetti S, Lee JS et al (2012) A multidimensional index and staging system for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Ann Intern Med 156:684–691
Takada K, Nagasaka K, Miyasaka N (2005) Polymyositis/dermatomyositis and interstitial lung disease: a new therapeutic approach with T-cell-specific immunosuppressants. Autoimmunity 38:383–392
Schnabel A, Reuter M, Biederer J, Richter C, Gross WL (2003) Interstitial lung disease in polymyositis and dermatomyositis: clinical course and response to treatment. Semin Arthritis Rheum 32:273–284
Douglas WW, Tazelaar HD, Hartman TE, Hartman RP, Decker PA, Schroeder DR (2001) Polymyositis-dermatomyositis-associated interstitial lung disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 164:1182–1185
Fujisawa T, Suda T, Nakamura Y, Enomoto N, Ide K, Toyoshima M et al (2005) Differences in clinical features and prognosis of interstitial lung diseases between polymyositis and dermatomyositis. J Rheumatol 32:58–64
Sauty A, Rochat T, Schoch OD, Hamacher J, Kurt AM, Dayer JM et al (1997) Pulmonary fibrosis with predominant CD8 lymphocytic alveolitis and anti-Jo-1 antibodies. Eur Respir J 10:2907–2912
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
M.N. has none to disclose. Y.K. has received consulting fees, speaking fees, and/or honoraria from AbbVie, Astellas Pharma, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers K.K., Eisai, Tanabe Mitsubishi Pharma, Pfizer Japan, UCB, Eli Lilly, Taisho-Toyama, Janssen, EA Pharma, Ayumi Pharmaseutical, and Takeda Pharmaceutical. T.T. has received consulting fees, speaking fees, and/or honoraria from Pfizer Japan, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Eisai, Astellas Pharma, and UCB (less than $10,000 each), and from Chugai Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers K.K., Daiichi Sankyo, AbbVie, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Pfizer Japan, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Takeda Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca K.K., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., and Novartis Pharma K.K. (more than $10,000 each).
The study was approved by the ethics committee (Ethics Committee of Keio University School of Medicine, approval number: 20110136). Informed consent from the patients was waived according to the regulations in Japan.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary Table 1
(DOCX 17 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nakazawa, M., Kaneko, Y. & Takeuchi, T. Risk factors for the recurrence of interstitial lung disease in patients with polymyositis and dermatomyositis: a retrospective cohort study. Clin Rheumatol 37, 765–771 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-017-3854-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-017-3854-8