Abstract
It is generally considered that karst aquifers have distinctly different properties from other bedrock aquifers. A search of the literature found five definitions that have been proposed to differentiate karst aquifers from non-karstic aquifers. The five definitions are based upon the presence of solution channel networks, hydraulic conductivities >10−6 m/s, karst landscapes, channels with turbulent flow, and caves. The percentage of unconfined carbonate aquifers that would classify as ‘karst’ ranges from <1 to >50%.
Résumé
On considère généralement que les aquifères karstiques ont des propriétés nettement différentes des autres aquifères rocheux. Une recherche bibliographique a trouvé cinq définitions qui ont été proposées pour différencier les aquifères karstiques des aquifères non karstiques. Les cinq définitions sont basées sur la présence de réseaux de conduits de dissolution, des conductivités hydrauliques supérieures à 10−6 m/s, des paysages karstiques, des conduits avec un écoulement turbulent, et des cavités. Le pourcentage d’aquifères carbonatés libres qui serait classé en tant que ‘karst’ varie de <1 à >50%.
Resumen
Generalmente se considera que los acuíferos kársticos tienen propiedades claramente distintas de otros acuíferos de la roca de base. Una búsqueda de la literatura encontró cinco definiciones que se han propuesto para diferenciar los acuíferos kársticos de los acuíferos no kársticos. Las cinco definiciones se basan en la presencia de redes de canales de disolución, conductividades hidráulicas >10−6 m/s, paisajes kársticos, canales con flujo turbulento y cuevas. El porcentaje de acuíferos carbonáticos no confinados que se clasificarían como “kársticos” oscilan entre <1 y > 50%.
摘要
通常认为岩溶含水层与其它基岩含水层相比具有明显不同的特性。文献搜索发现,从非岩溶含水层中区别岩溶含水层有五种定义。五种定义立足于存在着溶解通道网络、水力传导率 > 10−6 米/秒、岩溶景观、具有湍流的通道和洞穴。归为“岩溶”的非承压碳酸盐含水层的百分比范围为 < 1 到 >50%。
Resumo
Considera-se, geralmente, que os aquíferos cársticos têm propriedades diferentes de outros aquíferos rochosos. Uma pesquisa na literatura encontrou cinco definições que foram propostas para diferenciar os aquíferos cársticos dos aquíferos não-cársticos. As cinco definições baseiam-se na presença de redes de canais de solução, condutividades hidráulicas >10−6 m/s, paisagens cársticas, canais com fluxo turbulento e cavernas. A porcentagem de aquíferos livres carbonáticos que se classificariam como “carste” varia de <1 a > 50%.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Karst aquifers have distinctive characteristics that contrast strongly with aquifers with intergranular flow such as sand aquifers. This is because fracturing and dissolution both enhance permeability, resulting in tributary networks of channels that discharge at springs (Ford and Williams 2007). Most of the flow is in the fractures and channels but most of the storage is in the matrix, resulting in dual- or triple-porosity aquifers (Quinlan et al. 1996; Worthington and Ford 2009). These aquifers have rapid flow through the fractures and channels but long residence times in the matrix. Karst aquifers are often accompanied by a karst landscape on the surface (Ford and Williams 2007). There are a range of opinions in the literature for the defining characteristics of karst aquifers, and this essay discusses the different definitions that have been proposed.
Contrasting definitions
Five contrasting definitions for the term ‘karst aquifer’ can be distinguished:
-
1.
Network definition. Karst aquifers have been defined in terms of interconnectivity, with the threshold being where enlargement by weathering (principally dissolution) has produced a network of enlarged pathways that enhance aquifer permeability (Huntoon 1995; Klimchouk 2015; Chen et al. 2017). Simulations of flow in fractured-rock aquifers often utilize fracture apertures in the range 0.01–0.1 mm (Long et al. 1982; Hyman et al. 2015), but solution channel networks are characterized by substantially larger apertures. For instance, the solutional openings visible in televiewer or downhole video logs are commonly millimeters to centimeters in aperture (Price et al. 1982; Schürch and Buckley 2002; Maurice et al. 2012).
-
2.
Hydraulic conductivity definition. In a table of hydraulic conductivity values, Freeze and Cherry (1979 p. 29) differentiated between limestone and dolomite and karst limestone, with the hydraulic conductivity of karst limestone being >10−6 m/s.
-
3.
Geomorphic definition. The geomorphic definition associates the presence of a karst aquifer with surface karst landforms. These landforms are most commonly found where rocks that dissolve congruently are exposed at the Earth’s surface. These include limestone, dolostone, quartzite, gypsum, and halite (Wray 1997; Gunn 2004; Weary and Doctor 2015). Solutionally sculpted rock (karren) and enclosed depressions formed by dissolution such as dolines (sinkholes) are common landforms, and sinking streams and springs are the major hydrologic features of karst landscapes (Ford and Williams 2007).
-
4.
Hydraulic definition. Atkinson and Smart (1981) suggested that karstic conduits should be defined by the presence of turbulent flow. The onset of turbulent flow occurs at apertures of about 1 cm under common hydraulic gradients (Ford and Williams 2007), so this would define the minimum channel diameter for karstic flow.
-
5.
Speleological definition. The presence of caves formed by dissolution are a diagnostic feature of karst aquifers, and the presence of extensive caves with underground streams are generally considered to exemplify a well-developed karst aquifer (Ford and Williams 2007; Kresic 2013). In this case, the minimum channel aperture for a karst aquifer would be the size of passages that people can enter, which is about 0.5 m.
Pros and cons of the five definitions
The advantage of the solution-channel-network definition is that tracer tests can be used to identify whether a network of interconnected large-aperture pathways is present in an aquifer. Flow along such pathways results in groundwater velocities that are often >100 m/day, even with hydraulic apertures as small as 1 mm. These velocities are substantially greater than groundwater flow through the matrix of a rock or through networks of narrower fractures produced by tectonic processes. Consequently, this provides a useful diagnostic test for identifying preferential flow along enlarged pathways (Worthington 2015b). The definition is most often applied to rocks that dissolve congruently, including carbonates, evaporites, and quartzite (Weary and Doctor 2015; Chen et al. 2017); however, weathering can also enlarge apertures in rocks dominated by incongruent weathering such as many igneous and metamorphic rocks, shale, and arkosic sandstone. Nevertheless, these aquifers are not usually regarded as karstic because the clay minerals that are formed as a by-product of weathering usually inhibit the development of enclosed depressions and of caves (Lachassagne et al. 2011; Worthington et al., 2016).
The advantage of the hydraulic conductivity definition is that it enables carbonate aquifers to be classified as karstic or non-karstic because hydraulic conductivity is commonly determined using well tests, but a drawback is that the choice of a value to differentiate the two aquifer types is arbitrary. There is also the problem that scaling effects are usually substantial in carbonate aquifers, and so well tests are likely to underestimate aquifer permeability (Kiraly 1975).
The advantage of the geomorphic definition is that it is simple to apply and does not involve any hydrogeological testing. The presence of surface karstic features such as sinking streams, dolines, and springs are common indicators of the presence of an underlying karst aquifer with extensive solution channels. However, the lack of surficial karst features does not necessarily imply the lack of an underlying karst aquifer—for instance, Mammoth Cave, Kentucky (USA), the world’s most extensive mapped cave, is formed in Mississippian limestone, but the surficial rock over most of the cave is younger sandstone and conglomerate, with an absence of karst features (Granger et al. 2001); thus an aquifer that is clearly karstic underlies a non-karstic landscape. Consequently, the geomorphic definition does not give a reliable indication of whether there is an underlying karst aquifer.
The advantage of the hydraulic definition is that there is a clear hydraulic difference between laminar flow (where discharge is proportional to hydraulic gradient) and turbulent flow (where discharge is proportional to the square root of hydraulic gradient). However, it can be difficult to determine even from tracer testing whether flow is laminar or turbulent, which limits the usefulness of this definition (Worthington and Ford 2009).
The speleological definition is problematic because only a fraction of all caves are known—for instance, the number of caves in the world with at least 3 km of mapped passages increased from eight in 1900 to 46 in 1950, and to 1488 in 2001 (Worthington 2015a). Discovery and exploration of caves continues, and the total number and length of known caves continues to increase by several percent each year. Consequently, it is almost certain that only a small fraction of all caves is known, thus limiting the use of the speleological definition. Furthermore, wells do not provide a reliable method for revealing the presence of caves in an aquifer because the probability of a randomly drilled well intersecting a cave is usually <0.05, even in areas with extensive caves (Worthington 2015a).
Discussion and conclusions
Springs are widely monitored and characterized in karst aquifers (e.g. Bonacci 1993), but there are also some large springs in basalt and sandstone; however, there is no test in the literature that uses spring characteristics to differentiate karst aquifers from non-karstic aquifers.
Strong correlations have been found between hydraulic conductivity of the five major lithologies and both solute concentrations and dissolution rates of the constituent minerals (Table 1). This table also gives estimates of how frequently channels and caves in the different lithologies are intercepted by wells. Not surprisingly, the lithologies with higher mean solute concentrations and higher dissolution rates have more channels and caves. Solution channels have a fractal size distribution, with there being many small channels and few large channels (Curl 1986; Jeannin 1992; Worthington 2015a). Consequently, a randomly drilled well will have a very low probability of intersecting a cave passage (a very large channel), a higher probability of intersecting a conduit (a channel > ∼ 1 cm with turbulent flow), and an even higher probability of intersecting a 1 mm channel enlarged by dissolution but that only has laminar flow (Table 1; Fig. 1).
A first approximation of the frequency of karst aquifers can be estimated for the different definitions (Fig. 1). These estimates are for near-surface carbonate aquifers, within tens to hundreds of meters of the surface; at greater depths there is generally less dissolution and a decrease in hydraulic conductivity. Figure 1 shows that the fraction of carbonate aquifers that are defined as karstic varies from hardly any to most, depending on the definition adopted. The wide range of values suggests that caution needs to be used where referring to the term ‘karst aquifer’ because of the wide range of definitions.
Quartzites, like carbonate and evaporite rocks, have congruent dissolution, and caves are sometimes found in them (Piccini and Mecchia 2009). Most minerals in other silicate rocks dissolve incongruently, and caves are only rarely found in these rocks (Chabert and Courbon 1997; Willems et al. 2002); nevertheless, there may still be channels with turbulent flow, especially near large springs. Smaller channels with apertures of a few millimeters or less are probably common in most bedrock aquifers, and provide an explanation for the positive correlation in the five major lithologies between hydraulic conductivity and both solute concentrations and dissolution rates (Table 1; Worthington et al. 2016).
There are several practical reasons for determining which aquifers are karstic, and the definition used may vary with the goal of the study. Definition 1 would be most useful for characterizing contaminant transport in aquifers, and in particular the rapid transport that occurs where solution channel networks are present. On the other hand, definitions 3, 4, and 5 are the most useful for assessing karst hazards that may result in the collapse of infrastructure into sinkholes or subsurface voids (Waltham et al. 2005).
The wide range in dissolution rates and solute concentrations in the major lithologies (Table 1) means that there is no simple division of bedrock aquifers into karstic aquifers and aquifers that can be treated as inert. Rather, there is a progression from low-solubility rocks such as shale that may have enhanced permeability from solution channel networks to more soluble rocks such as limestone that may have not only solution channel networks but also caves and karst landscapes on the surface (Worthington et al. 2016). This range in properties has resulted in several valid definitions with contrasting meanings for the term ‘karst aquifer’, and means that there is no single ideal definition.
References
Atkinson TC, Smart PL (1981) Artificial tracers in hydrogeology. In: A survey of British hydrogeology 1980. Royal Soc, London, pp 173–190
Bonacci O (1993) Karst springs hydrographs as indicators of karst aquifers. Hydrol Sci J 38:51–62
Chabert C, Courbon P (1997) Atlas des cavités non calcaire du monde [Atlas of the non-calcareous cavities of the world]. Union Internationale de Spéléologie. http://www.uis-speleo.org. Accessed June 2017
Chen Z, Auler AS, Bakalowicz M, Drew D, Griger F, Hartmann J, Jiang G, Moosdorf N, Richts A, Stevanovic Z, Veni G, Goldscheider N (2017) The world karst aquifer mapping project: concept, mapping procedure and map of Europe. Hydrogeol J 25:771–785
Curl RL (1986) Fractal dimensions and geometries of caves. Math Geol 18:765–783
Ford DC, Williams PW (2007) Karst hydrogeology and geomorphology. Wiley, Chichester, England
Freeze RA, Cherry JA (1979) Groundwater. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Gleeson T, Smith L, Moosdorf N, Hartmann J, Dürr HH, Manning AH, van Beek LPH, Jellinek AM (2011) Mapping permeability over the surface of the Earth. Geophys Res Lett 46:L02401. doi:10.1029/2010GL045565
Granger DE, Fabel D, Palmer AN (2001) Pliocene-Pleistocene incision the Green River, Kentucky, determined from radioactive decay of cosmogenic 26Al and 10Be in mammoth cave sediments. Geol Soc Am Bull 113:825–836
Gunn J (2004) Encyclopedia of caves and karst science. Fitzroy Dearborn, N Y
Huntoon PW (1995) Is it appropriate to apply porous media groundwater circulation models to karstic aquifers? In: El-Kadi AI (ed) Groundwater models for resources analysis and management. Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, pp 339–358
Hyman JD, Painter SL, Viswanathan H, Makedonska N, Karra S (2015) Influence of injection mode on transport properties in kilometer-scale three-dimensional discrete fracture networks. Water Resour Res 51:7289–7308
Jeannin PY (1992) Géométrie des réseaux de drainage karstique: approche structurale, statistique et fractale [Geometry of karstic drainage networks: structural, statistical and fractal approach]. Ann Sci Univer Besançon 11:1–8
Kiraly L (1975) Rapport sur l'état actuel des connaissances dans le domaine des charactères physiques des roches karstiques [Report on the current state of knowledge in the field of physical characteristics of karstic rocks]. In: Burger A, Dubertret L (eds) Hydrogeology of karstic terrains. Int. Union Geol. Sci., Series B, no. 3, pp 53–67
Klimchouk A (2015) The karst paradigm: changes, trends and perspectives. Acta Carsolog 44:289–313
Kresic N (2013) Water in karst: management, vulnerability, and restoration. McGraw-Hill, New York
Lachassagne P, Wyns R, Dewandel B (2011) The fracture permeability of hard rock aquifers is due neither to tectonics, not to unloading, but to weathering processes. Terra Nova 23:145–161
Long JCS, Remer JS, Wilson CR, Witherspoon PA (1982) Porous media equivalents for networks of discontinuous fractures. Water Resour Res 18:645–658
Maurice LD, Atkinson TC, Barker JA, Williams AT, Gallagher AJ (2012) The nature and distribution of flowing features in a weakly karstified porous limestone aquifer. J Hydrol 438-439:3–15
Piccini L, Mecchia M (2009) Solution weathering rate and origin of karst landforms and caves in the quartzite of Auyan-tepui (Gran Sabana, Venezuela). Geomorphology 106:15–25
Price M, Morris B, Robertson A (1982) A study of intergranular and fissure permeability in chalk and Permian aquifers, using double packer injection testing. J Hydrol 54:401–423
Quinlan JF, Davies GJ, Jones SJ, Huntoon PW (1996) The applicability of numerical models to adequately characterize ground-water flow in karstic and other triple-porosity aquifers. In: Ritchey JD, Rumbaugh JO (eds) Subsurface fluid-flow (ground-water) modeling. ASTM STP 1288, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, pp 114–133
Schürch M, Buckley D (2002) Integrating geophysical and hydrochemical borehole-log measurements to characterize the chalk aquifer, Berkshire, United Kingdom. Hydrogeol J 10:610–627
Waltham T, Bell FG, Culshaw MG (2005) Sinkholes and subsidence. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany
Weary DJ, Doctor DH (2015) Karst mapping in the United States: past, present, and future. Geol Soc Am Spec Pap 516:35–48
Willems L, Compère P, Hatert F, Pouclet A, Vicat JP, Ek C, Boulvain F (2002) Karst in granitic rocks, South Cameroon: cave genesis and silica and taranakite speleothems. Terra Nova 14:355–362
Worthington SRH (2015a) Characteristics of channel networks in unconfined carbonate aquifers. Geol Soc Am Bull 125:759–769
Worthington SRH (2015b) Diagnostic tests for conceptualizing transport in bedrock aquifers. J Hydrol 529:365–372
Worthington SRH, Ford DC (2009) Self-organized permeability in carbonate aquifers. Ground Water 47:326–336
Worthington SRH, Davies GJ, Alexander EC Jr (2016) Enhancement of bedrock permeability by weathering. Earth-Sci Rev 160:188–202
Wray RAL (1997) A global review of solutional weathering forms on quartz sandstones. Earth-Sci Rev 42:137–160
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Derek Ford and to three anonymous reviewers for comments on the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(PDF 557 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Worthington, S.R.H., Jeannin, PY., Alexander, E.C. et al. Contrasting definitions for the term ‘karst aquifer’. Hydrogeol J 25, 1237–1240 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-017-1628-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-017-1628-7