Abstract
Patients with MRI-proved acute painful vertebral fractures in whom conservative pain management fails are frequently referred for vertebroplasty. This study investigated the effects of treating osteoporosis on the mortality rate of patients with MRI-proved acute osteoporosis-related vertebral fractures who had undergone vertebroplasty. We retrospectively reviewed the cases of osteoporosis patients with MRI-proved acute vertebral fractures who had been treated with vertebroplasty from January 2001 to December 2007. The long-term outcomes of the patients who received antiosteoporotic therapy were compared with those of patients who received no therapy. A total of 304 patients (247 female patients and 57 male patients; mean age, 74.1 ± 7.7 years) were enrolled in the study. The patients who received antiosteoporotic therapy had a significantly lower mortality rate than did patients who did not receive antiosteoporotic therapy (P = 0.001; hazard ratio, 0.396, 95 % confidence interval, 0.273–0.575). At the end of the study, 183 patients were alive, and 121 had died. Effective treatment for osteoporosis may improve survival in patients with osteoporosis-related vertebral fractures after vertebroplasty.
We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Osteoporotic fractures of the spine are common with aging, and the lifetime risk of a symptomatic vertebral compression fracture has been estimated to be 18 % for women and 11 % for men [1]. In addition, painful, clinically apparent vertebral fractures have been reported to increase overall mortality by up to 15 % [2]. Furthermore, some individuals will become disabled by severe pain that lasts longer than 2–3 months.
Patients with acute painful vertebral fractures who fail to achieve relief with conservative pain management are frequently referred for vertebral augmentation procedures [3]. Vertebroplasty has been used for more than a decade; however, despite favorable clinical outcomes that might be presumed to confer a survival advantage, there are few studies on mortality among patients who undergo this procedure [4, 5].
Antiosteoporotic therapy increases spinal, total hip, and femoral neck bone mineral density. Results from recent studies of patients who have received antiosteoporotic treatment have increasingly shown reductions in the incidence of vertebral fractures [6]. Data from studies of pharmacologic agents used to reduce the risk of fractures provide a way to test the hypothesis that treating osteoporosis reduces the risk of death. If treating osteoporosis does have a positive impact on mortality among patients who have undergone vertebroplasty, there would be several important potential implications for managing skeletal health specifically, and implications for health care of the elderly in general. Thus, in this study, we investigated whether treatment of osteoporosis affects mortality rates in patients who have undergone vertebroplasty.
Materials and methods
The study design was a retrospective review of cases of osteoporosis patients with acute vertebral fractures proved by MRI with low signal intensity (SI) on T1-weighted imaging, enhanced SI on T2-weighted imaging, and enhanced fat-suppressed SI on T1-weighted imaging of the injured vertebral body [7]. All patients in the study had been treated with vertebroplasty at Kaohsiung Chang Gang Memorial Hospital between January 2001 and December 2007. Institutional review boards from Kaohsiung Chang Gang Memorial Hospital provided ethical approval, and the study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the International Conference on Harmonization of Good Clinical Practice Guidelines. In accord with Taiwanese law, no additional informed consent was required. Patient information was anonymized and de-identified before data analysis.
The inclusion criteria were an MRI diagnosis of acute vertebral fracture: low SI on T1-weighted imaging, enhanced SI on T2-weighted imaging, and enhanced fat-suppressed SI on T1-weighted imaging of the injured vertebral body among patients who had undergone vertebroplasty for a painful vertebral compression fracture. We obtained the electronic medical records of all patients who underwent vertebral augmentation procedures. Patients were excluded if their fracture had a pathologic source or had been caused by more than minimal trauma.
Follow-up for each participant was calculated as the time from inclusion in the study to December 31, 2013, or the time of death, whichever occurred first. All patients included in the study underwent baseline bone density studies, and age, gender, and body mass index (kg/m2) were recorded. All associated medical diseases, such as diabetes, hypertension, and liver and renal disease, were recorded. Use of any of the following antiosteoporotic drugs was also recorded: alendronate, raloxifen, calcitonin, and teriparatide.
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 21.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Kaplan-Meyer analysis with the log-rank test was performed for different groups of antiosteoporotic agents. Comparisons between independent means were analyzed using the independent t test. Relationships between categorical variables were evaluated with the chi square test. Cox regression analysis was used to make adjustments for potential confounding factors. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Results
Three hundred four patients with MRI-proved acute vertebral fractures (Fig. 1) who underwent vertebroplasty between January 2003 and December 2007 were enrolled in this study; 64 % were women. The mean age at the index day was 72.21 ± 9.68 years for men and 74.52 ± 7.13 years for women. The mean follow-up period was 7.08 ± 3.67 years. All were grade 3 on the semiquantitative grading scale for vertebral fracture and had T-score < −2.5 measured by bone densitometry.
At the end of the follow-up period, 183 of the original 304 patients had survived, and 121 patients had died. The mean age of those who died was 74.97 ± 7.778 years, compared with 73.19 ± 8.180 years for those who were still alive. There were no significant differences in gender, body mass index, number of vertebral fractures, previous hip fracture, alcohol consumption, or underlying diseases, including diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, pulmonary disease, liver disease, kidney disease, or neurological disease. In contrast, smoking (P = 0.045) increased mortality, and antiosteoporotic therapy decreased mortality (P = 0001), and incidence of subsequent fractures (spine, hip, and forearm) was lower in the alive group (Table 1).
One hundred seventy-eight patients accepted antiosteoporotic therapy after vertebroplasty: alendroante for 84 patients (47.5 %), raloxifen for 46 patients (26 %), calcitonin for 34 patients (19.2 %), and teriparatide for 13 patients (7.3 %). Overall, the adherence rate ws 70.4 %.
Antiosteoporotic therapy after vertebroplasty had a significant effect on survival, according to the Kaplan–Meier curve (Fig. 2). When we made adjustments for potential confounding factors such as smoking, alcohol consumption, diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, pulmonary disease, liver disease, kidney disease, and neurological disease, the treated patients still had a lower mortality rate than those who did not receive treatment (P = 0.001; hazard ratio, 2.585, 95 % confidence interval, 1.781–3.754). Whereas mortality increased in patients with diabetes (P = 0.025; hazard ratio,1.605; 95 % confidence interval, 1.061–2.427), smoking, alcohol consumption, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, pulmonary disease, liver disease, kidney disease, and neurological disease were not associated with an increase in the risk of death (P > 0.005) (Table 2). When we evaluated the cause of mortality, we found the commonest cause was infection (pneumonia, septicemia, urinary tract infection), and antiosteoporotic therapy was associated with a lower infection rate (Table 3). There were no differences in the rates of cancer, cardiovascular events, stroke, or renal failure.
Discussion
Established osteoporosis has been associated with a high mortality rate after adjustments for age and comorbidities [8, 9]. Prevalent vertebral deformities have been reported to predict increased mortality and fracture rates in both men and women [10–15]. Treatment of osteoporosis with established efficacy for vertebral and nonvertebral fractures has been reported to reduce mortality in older, frailer individuals who are at a high risk of fractures [6, 16, 17].
Vertebral fractures are the fractures most commonly associated with osteoporosis, and clinically apparent vertebral deformities are associated with poorer survival. Most individuals with radiographically apparent vertebral deformities do not, however, seek medical care [9, 18]. Vertebroplasty is a minimally invasive percutaneous technique for the treatment of symptomatic vertebral body fractures caused by osteoporosis, and positive outcomes have been demonstrated in many trials [19, 20]. The advantages include pain relief and restoration of vertebral body height, but there is little evidence of its longer-term safety [21–23]. Fractured vertebrae treated with bone cements are stiffer than untreated vertebrae and thus may transfer a greater load to adjacent vertebral levels [24, 25]. Thus, the disadvantage is the concern that these procedures could lead to a heightened rate of subsequent fractures. Vertebroplasty candidates represent the subpopulation of vertebral compression fractures with the highest risk of death owing to associated comorbid conditions and the intrinsic severity of their osteoporotic disease. Patients who do undergo vertebroplasty have been reported to have a mortality rate similar to that of those with untreated symptomatic fractures, but a worse mortality rate compared with those with asymptomatic vertebral fractures [5]. Our patients had high mortality possibly owing to advanced age and long follow-up times.
Specific medical therapy for osteoporosis includes anticatabolic drugs, bisphosphonates, estrogen replacement therapy, and parathyroid hormone analogs. Bisphosphonates are the compounds most commonly used to treat postmenopausal osteoporosis. In our review, alendronate was the drug most commonly used to treat osteoporosis, with an overall adherence rate of 70 %. This may be reason for the relative lower mortality rate.
In one study of mortality and morbidity associated with osteoporosis drug treatment following a hip fracture, mortality was significantly lower in treated patients than in a group that was not treated [8]. The lower mortality rate in the treated group, combined with the knowledge that antiresorptive drugs reduce fractures and increase bone density, merits a randomized trial, and antiresorptive therapy should be considered for all patients after a hip fracture.
In clinical practice, some patients with vertebral fractures receive no medical therapy after vertebroplasty. In our cohort, 178 of the 304 patients (58.6 %) accepted antiosteoporotic therapy. Thus, even among patients with symptomatic vertebral fractures, some patients did not seek further treatment, and this attitude may contribute to subsequent vertebral fractures and increased mortality [26]. Our data show that antiosteoporotic therapy can reduce mortality, underscoring the importance of educating patients with osteoporosis about the value of medical therapy.
Why does antiosteoporotic therapy decrease mortality? A possible pathway is through a drug effect on the immune system. In addition to the changes in the levels of cytokines and the monocyte–macrophage system [27], there is epidemiologic evidence to support this hypothesis. A greater than tenfold increased risk of infectious death, particularly septicemia and pneumonia, was seen in a cohort of hip fracture patients relative to the general population over 2 years [28]. Antiosteoporotic therapy patients were less likely to die of pneumonia.
There are several limitations to this study. First, the sample size was small. Second, because the study had a retrospective design, we could not include complete data, such as the use of vitamin D and calcium supplements. Third, there was a lack of complete bone mineral density data after osteoporosis treatment. However, in this single-center cohort, we collected as many data as possible, and this study included only fragility fractures in patients older than 50 years without a secondary cause. Thus, the patients’ fractures were due to osteoporosis.
This study also has a number of strengths. First, it was a long-term cohort study with a mean follow-up period of 7 years, which made it possible to gather sufficient follow-up data on survival. In addition, baseline MRI scans were taken for all participants, all of whom had clinically diagnosed vertebral fractures. Thus, we were able to exclude other secondary causes of vertebral fracture such as cancer or pyogenic infection.
Our results showed that pharmacologic therapy can reduce the mortality rate of patients with osteoporosis and vertebral fractures. After adjustment for comorbidities, the patients who received pharmacologic therapy still had lower mortality rates. Thus, optimal osteoporosis management may reduce the risk of death. The reduction in infection led to decreased mortality in the osteoporosis management group. A possible reason may be that osteoporosis management decreased refracture rates and the improved health-related quality of life and therefore the infection rate was relatively low.
In conclusion, the results of this study show that antiosteoporotic therapy is associated with a decreased risk of death. Thus, after vertebroplasty, aggressive medical therapy is suggested for all patients with osteoporosis.
References
Cooper C, Atkinson EJ, Jacobsen SJ, O’Fallon WM, Melton LJ 3rd (1993) Population-based study of survival after osteoporotic fractures. Am J Epidemiol 137:1001–1005
Hasserius R, Karlsson MK, Jonsson B, Redlund-Johnell I, Johnell O (2005) Long-term morbidity and mortality after a clinically diagnosed vertebral fracture in the elderly–a 12- and 22-year follow-up of 257 patients. Calcif Tissue Int 76:235–242
Garfin SR, Yuan HA, Reiley MA (2001) New technologies in spine: kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for the treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:1511–1515
Lavelle WF, Khaleel MA, Cheney R, Demers E, Carl AL (2008) Effect of kyphoplasty on survival after vertebral compression fractures. Spine J 8:763–769
McDonald RJ, Achenbach SJ, Atkinson EJ, Gray LA, Cloft HJ, Melton LJ 3rd et al (2011) Mortality in the vertebroplasty population. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32:1818–1823
Center JR, Bliuc D, Nguyen ND, Nguyen TV, Eisman JA (2011) Osteoporosis medication and reduced mortality risk in elderly women and men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96:1006–1014
Lin WC, Lu CH, Chen HL, Wang HC, Yu CY, Wu RW et al (2010) The impact of preoperative magnetic resonance images on outcome of cemented vertebrae. Eur Spine J 19:1899–1906
Shiraki M, Kuroda T, Tanaka S (2011) Established osteoporosis associated with high mortality after adjustment for age and co-mobidities in postmenopausal Japanese women. Intern Med 50:397–404
Ismail AA, O’Neill TW, Cooper C, Finn JD, Bhalla AK, Cannata JB et al (1998) Mortality associated with vertebral deformity in men and women: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS). Osteoporos Int 8:291–297
Hasserius R, Karlsson MK, Nilsson BE, Redlund-Johnell I, Johnell O (2003) Prevalent vertebral deformities predict increased mortality and increased fracture rate in both men and women: a 10-year population-based study of 598 individuals from the Swedish cohort in the European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study. Osteoporos Int 14:61–68
Jalava T, Sarna S, Pylkkanen L, Mawer B, Kanis JA, Selby P et al (2003) Association between vertebral fracture and increased mortality in osteoporotic patients. J Bone Miner Res 18:1254–1260
Naves M, Diaz-Lopez JB, Gomez C, Rodriguez-Rebollar A, Rodriguez-Garcia M, Cannata-Andia JB (2003) The effect of vertebral fracture as a risk factor for osteoporotic fracture and mortality in a Spanish population. Osteoporos Int 14:520–524
Nguyen ND, Ahlborg HG, Center JR, Eisman JA, Nguyen TV (2007) Residual lifetime risk of fractures in women and men. J Bone Miner Res 22:781–788
Puisto V, Rissanen H, Heliovaara M, Impivaara O, Jalanko T, Kroger H et al (2011) Vertebral fracture and cause-specific mortality: a prospective population study of 3,210 men and 3,730 women with 30 years of follow-up. Eur Spine J 20:2181–2186
Lau E, Ong K, Kurtz S, Schmier J, Edidin A (2008) Mortality following the diagnosis of a vertebral compression fracture in the Medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:1479–1486
Bolland MJ, Grey AB, Gamble GD, Reid IR (2010) Effect of osteoporosis treatment on mortality: a meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95:1174–1181
Grey A, Bolland MJ (2013) The effect of treatments for osteoporosis on mortality. Osteoporos Int 24:1–6
Gehlbach SH, Bigelow C, Heimisdottir M, May S, Walker M, Kirkwood JR (2000) Recognition of vertebral fracture in a clinical setting. Osteoporos Int 11:577–582
Lewis G (2007) Percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for the stand-alone augmentation of osteoporosis-induced vertebral compression fractures: present status and future directions. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 81:371–386
Lavanga A, Guarnieri G, Muto M (2010) Medical therapy and multilevel vertebroplasty in osteoporosis: when and why. Neuroradiol J 23:244–248
Kallmes DF (2006) Randomized vertebroplasty trials: current status and challenges. Acad Radiol 13:546–549
Melton LJ 3rd, Kallmes DF (2006) Epidemiology of vertebral fractures: implications for vertebral augmentation. Acad Radiol 13:538–545
Truumees E, Hilibrand A, Vaccaro AR (2004) Percutaneous vertebral augmentation. Spine J. 4:218–229
Berlemann U, Ferguson SJ, Nolte LP, Heini PF (2002) Adjacent vertebral failure after vertebroplasty. A biomechanical investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:748–752
Polikeit A, Nolte LP, Ferguson SJ (2003) The effect of cement augmentation on the load transfer in an osteoporotic functional spinal unit: finite-element analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:991–996
Huntjens KM, Kosar S, van Geel TA, Geusens PP, Willems P, Kessels A et al (2010) Risk of subsequent fracture and mortality within 5 years after a non-vertebral fracture. Osteoporos Int 21:2075–2082
Tuominen OM, Ylitalo-Heikkala R, Vehmas TI, Mucha I, Ylitalo P, Riutta A (2006) Effects of bisphosphonates on prostaglandin E2 and thromboxane B2 production in human whole blood and monocytes stimulated by lipopolysaccharide and A23187. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 28:361–367
Hawkes WG, Wehren L, Orwig D, Hebel JR, Magaziner J (2006) Gender differences in functioning after hip fracture. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 61:495–499
Conflict of interest
Ying-Chou Chen, Wei-Che Lin, Chun-Chung Lui, Fu-Mei Su, and Tien-Tsai Cheng declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, YC., Su, FM., Cheng, TT. et al. Can antiosteoporotic therapy reduce mortality in MRI-proved acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures?. J Bone Miner Metab 34, 325–330 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-015-0672-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-015-0672-4