Introduction

Horseradish peroxidase (HRP), an important enzyme obtained from horseradish [1], is frequently utilized in sensing various important substances in clinical chemistry [2], environmental chemistry [2] and food industry [3]. Glucose is also closely related to HRP-catalyzed cycle in physiology [4,5,6]. Although plenty of methods for the detection of glucose have been developed, including colorimetry [7], fluorescent spectrometry [8] and electrochemistry methods [9], etc. [10], only a few detection strategies for HRP was reported [11,12,13].

Among the analytical techniques, the fluorescent spectrometry appears to be an effective and low-cost detection tool due to its excellent fluorescence brightness, extraordinary photostability, excellent biocompatibility and good sensitivity [14, 15]. Fluorescent sensors have been commonly used for chemical and biological analysis with the detecting mechanisms including electronic energy transfer (EET), fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), photoinduced electron transfer (PET), etc [14, 16, 17]. The fluorescent sensor based on these mechanisms usually involved complicated fabrication such as the bond linkage between the receptor and fluorophore. However, the sensor fabrication was commonly costly and time-consuming, which seriously restricted their practical applications. Inner filter effect (IFE) was generally produced by the absorption of the excitation and/or emission light of the absorber. As a non-irradiation energy conversion pattern, it had been used for fluorescent detection [18,19,20]. The detection methods based on IFE would be more flexible and efficient since no restrictive chemical connection between the fluorophore and the absorber was needed.

As a new emerging kind of fluorescent nanomaterials with low cytotoxicity, excellent optical properties, good water solubility and biocompatibility, polymer dots (PDs) have been widely used in the detection of various analytes [15, 21, 22]. In this paper, PDs, which were prepared by one-pot aqueous synthetic route from 1,4-benzoquinone and ethylenediamine, displayed a maximum excitation wavelength at 410 nm and a maximum emission wavelength at 515 nm. The oxidation of PPD by HRP/H2O2 leads to a red-colored product (Bandrowski’s base, PPDox, Scheme 1A) with a maximum absorption at 510 nm. The band overlaps both the fluorescence excitation and emission spectra of PDs. Thus, fluorescence is turned off due to IFE, which can directly demonstrate the activity of HRP. On the other hand, glucose can be converted into H2O2 by the catalytic action of glucose oxidase (GOx) (Scheme 1A), and this paves the way for the quantification of glucose.

Scheme 1
scheme 1

Schematic illustration of fluorescence ELISA based on HRP-triggered fluorescence quenching of PDs for glucose and Cry1Ab/Ac protein detection.

To improve the resistance to insects, a few genetically modified crops such as Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) gene-embedded crops have been authorized by many countries. However, the cultivation of genetically modified crops should be managed by the authorized institutes. Unreasonable cultivation may contaminate non-transgenic varieties and cause unexpected biosafety and ecological environment problem [23, 24]. Sensitive detection methods for Bt proteins should be explored since their content is quite low in crops. The insecticidal proteinic toxin Cry1Ab/Ac is the most common Bt protein in genetically modified crops [25, 26]. In this work, the PD-based nanoprobe was successfully extended into the HRP-based fluorescent enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in the determination of Cry1Ab/Ac protein (Scheme 1B). The excellent performance in real rice leaves analysis indicated that the PD-based fluorescence nanoprobe exhibited a promising prospect in related biological detection applications.

Experimental section

Materials and apparatus

All the materials and apparatus were presented in supplementary material.

Preparation of PDs

The fluorescent PDs were synthesized according to our previous report [27]. The detailed information for preparation of PDs was shown in supplementary material.

Procedure for the determination of HRP activity

Different concentrations (0, 0.0002, 0.01, 0.02, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08, 0.1, 0.12, 0.14, 0.16, 0.2, 2, 10, 20, 50, 100, 125 and 200 U·mL−1) of HRP solution, H2O2 solution (10 mM) and PPD solution (10 mM) were prepared with phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH = 7.0, 10 mM). HRP solution (150 μL) with different concentrations was added into a centrifugal tube. To which, 50 μL of H2O2 solution, 50 μL of PPD solution and 250 μL of PBS solution were added in sequence. The resulting mixture was incubated for 15 min at ambient temperature. 300 μL of reaction solution was added to 200 μL PD solution. Finally, the fluorescence intensity of the reaction system was recorded under the excitation wavelength of 410 nm.

The selectivity of the detecting system for HRP activity was investigated with several common biomolecules, including bovine serum albumin (BSA), α-L-fucosidase (AFu), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), α-glucosidase, β-glucosidase, α-amylase, lipase and metal salts (FeCl3, CaCl2, NaCl, MgCl2) as controls following the above procedure.

Procedure for the determination of glucose

Glucose solution with different concentrations (0, 0.1, 1, 10, 50, 100, 250, 500, 1000, 2500, 5000, 7500 and 10,000 μM), GOx solution (20 U·mL−1), HRP solution (1 μg·mL−1) and PPD solution (15 mM) were prepared with PBS solution (10 mM pH = 7.0). Glucose solution (75 μL) with different concentrations was added into 75 μL of GOx solution and reacted for 30 min at 37 °C. Then, 450 μL of HRP solution, 150 μL of PPD solution, 750 μL of PBS solution were added to the reaction mixture in sequence. The resulting mixture was incubated for 15 min at room temperature. 300 μL of reaction solution was mixed with 200 μL of PD solution and the fluorescence intensity was recorded with the excitation wavelength of 410 nm.

Fluorescence immunoassay for Cry1Ab/Ac protein

The determination of Cry1Ab/Ac protein was performed by using a commercial Cry1Ab/Ac ELISA kit with PPD instead of 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) as reaction substrate. The analysis was performed as following: firstly, 100 μL of Cry1Ab/Ac protein standards with different concentrations (0, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, 10, 12.5, 20, 25 and 30 ng·mL−1) were added to wells coated with anti-mouse Cry1Ab/Ac, and wells were incubated for 45 min at 25 °C. Then, wells were rinsed with Tween in phosphate buffered saline (PBS-T) solution for five times. 100 μL of HRP-conjugated antibody was dropped and wells were incubated for 30 min at 25 °C to form the sandwich immunocomplex before being washed with PBS-T solution for five times. Subsequently, PPD (100 μL, 15 mM), H2O2 (100 μL, 15 mM) and PBS solution (pH 7.0, 100 μL, 10 mM) were added in sequence and wells were incubated for 20 min at 37 °C. Then, the reaction solution (250 μL) was added to PD solution (75 μL) and the fluorescence intensity was measured with the excitation wavelength of 410 nm.

The determination of Cry1Ab/Ac protein in real rice leaves was also investigated by this method. The Cry1Ab/Ac protein from rice leaves was extracted as following: 1.0 g of fresh rice leaves was weighed, smashed, added into 10 mL of sample extracting solution, shook for 5 min, and centrifuged at 4000 r·min−1 (max relative centrifugal force 15,100 g) for 3 min. The supernatant was collected and submitted for fluorescence immunoassay according to the same procedure above by just adding the supernatant instead of the Cry1Ab/Ac protein standard solutions.

Results and discussion

Principle of HRP activity assay

Figure 1a is a schematic illustration for the mechanism of PD-based nanoprobe for HRP activity detection. HRP/H2O2-catalyzed oxidation of PPD produced colored PPDox with a wide absorption peak around 510 nm, which overlapped the fluorescence emission and excitation spectra of PDs simultaneously (Fig. 1b) and resulted in a fluorescence quenching of PDs due to IFE.

Fig. 1
figure 1

a Principle of HRP activity determination based on IFE, b UV-Vis absorption spectra of PPD solution (a) and PPDox solution (b), fluorescence excitation (c) and emission spectra (d) of PD solution, c UV-Vis absorbance spectra of PPD solution (a), PPD solution + H2O2 solution (b), PPD solution + HRP solution (c), H2O2 solution + HRP solution (d), and PPD solution + HRP solution + H2O2 solution (e) in 10 mM pH 7.0 PBS. d Fluorescence spectra of PD solution (a), PD solution mixed with PPD solution (b), PPD solution + H2O2 solution (c), PPD solution + HRP solution (d), H2O2 solution + HRP solution (e), and PPD solution + HRP + H2O2 solution (f) in 10 mM pH 7.0 PBS

To prove the reliability of this design, the UV-vis absorption spectrum of PPD solution (dissolved in 10 mM PBS solution, pH = 7.0) was measured. As shown in Fig. 1c line a, colorless PPD solution showed a strong UV-vis absorption wavelength at 305 nm. Under the same conditions, 10 mM H2O2 solution and 4 U·mL−1 HRP solution was added into the PPD solution, respectively. The UV-vis absorption spectra of PPD solution did not significantly change (Fig. 1c lines b, c). These solutions had no interference on the fluorescence of PDs (Fig. 1d lines a, b, c, d, e). However, a new strong UV-vis absorption peak appeared at 510 nm when H2O2 solution and HRP solution was simultaneously added to PPD solution (Fig. 1c line e). As expected, a significant fluorescence quenching of PDs was observed after the addition of the three-component mixture into PD solution (Fig. 1d line f). These results validated the reliability of our nanoprobe. It is noteworthy that PPD solution must be freshly prepared since it would be oxidized if exposing to the air for a long time.

The zeta potential of PD solution and PPDox solution were respectively measured as −18.3 mV and − 22.95 mV (Fig. S4A), which indicated that there was no electrostatic interaction between the negatively charged PDs and PPDox. Therefore, the interaction was not possible due to FRET or PET mechanism, which was occurred in the case of opposite charges [28, 29]. The fluorescence decay curve of PDs was not changed in the presence of PPDox in this study (Fig. S4B), which indicated that there was no energy transfer process [30, 31]. Both results indicated that the fluorescence quenching between PDs and PPDox was arisen from IFE.

The determination of HRP activity

To optimize the enzymatic hydrolysis time, the time-dependent fluorescence intensity ratios I/I0 of the reaction system were investigated. I/I0 value reached the plateau at 15 min with different concentrations of HRP (Fig. 2a). Subsequently, the performance of PD-based nanoprobe for HRP activity detection was investigated under the optimized reaction time of 15 min. The fluorescence spectra (Fig. 2b) illustrated that the fluorescence intensity of sensing system was effectively reduced with the HRP concentration increased from 0 to 200 U·mL−1. Figure 2d shows the regression line between the relative fluorescence intensity (I0-I) of PDs (Fig. 2c) and the HRP activity from 0.0002 to 0.2 U·mL−1. A regression equation was obtained as y = 13,141.53x + 7683 and the linear correlation coefficient was 0.9911. The HRP activity detection limit was calculated to be 0.2 U·L−1 based on the 3σ method.

Fig. 2
figure 2

a The relationship between relative fluorescence intensities and incubation time in different concentration of HRP, b Fluorescence spectra (λexem = 410/515 nm) of the detecting system for different HRP concentrations with 10 mM PPD and H2O2 incubated for 20 min at 37 °C, c Plots of I0-I vs concentrations of HRP from 0.0002 to 200 U·mL−1, d Linear range of I0-I against concentrations of HRP from 0.0002 to 0.2 U·mL−1. I and I0 was the fluorescence intensity of the detecting system in the presence and absence of HRP, respectively

Selectivity of HRP activity determination

The selectivity of this detecting system was performed by using several common biomolecules, including BSA, AFu, ALP, α-glucosidase, β-glucosidase, α-amylase, lipase and metal ions (Fe3+, Ca2+, Na+, Mg2+) as controls. Figure 3 demonstrates that these potential interferences did not show noticeable influence on the detecting system either in the absence (red histogram) or presence of HRP (black histogram), which indicated that our detecting system was highly selective.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Relative fluorescence intensities of detecting system in the presence of various proteins or metal ions (250 U·L−1 for enzymes and 1 mmol/L for metal ions) with (red columns) and without (black columns) HRP (20 U·mL−1) after incubation for 15 min, where I and I0 was the fluorescence intensity of the detecting system in the presence and absence of interferents, respectively

Fluorescent detecting of glucose

The detecting system of HRP activity was on account of HRP/H2O2-induced oxidation PPD into PPDox, while H2O2 can also be generated via the enzymatic oxidation of glucose by GOx. Therefore, the detecting system was further extended to glucose content measurement. As the concentrations of glucose increased, the fluorescence of PDs was quenched gradually (Fig. 4a). As shown in Fig. 4b, a good regression line between the relative fluorescence intensity (I0-I) of PDs and the concentration of glucose from 0.1 to 1000 μM (R2 = 0.9916) was exhibited. The detection limit for glucose was calculated as 0.1 μM (3σ method). Compared to other methods for the determination of glucose, this assay showed a lower detection limit (Table S1).

Fig. 4
figure 4

a Fluorescence spectra (λexem = 410/515 nm) of the detecting system with the increasing concentrations of glucose (from top to bottom: 0, 0.1, 1, 10, 50, 100, 250, 500, 1000, 2500, 5000, 7500 and 10,000 μM). b Linear range of I0-I against concentrations of glucose from 0.1 to 1000 μM, where I0 and I was the fluorescence intensity of the detecting system in the absence and presence of glucose, respectively

Fluorescent immunoassay for Cry1Ab/Ac protein

Considering HRP was one of the most widely used enzymes in ELISA, we attempted to extend this assay to HRP-enabled fluorescence ELISA for Cry1Ab/Ac protein detection. As shown in Scheme 1, the antigen was Cry1Ab/Ac protein, the primary antibody was anti-mouse Cry1Ab/Ac, and the secondary antibody was anti-rabbit Cry1Ab/Ac labeled with HRP. After the sandwich immunocomplex was formed, HRP bound on the wells triggered the conversion of PPD into PPDox in the presence of H2O2, resulting in the fluorescence quenching of PDs. As the concentration of Cry1Ab/Ac protein increased, the fluorescence intensity of PDs gradually declined (Fig. 5a). A good regression line between the relative fluorescence intensity (I0-I) of PDs and the concentration of Cry1Ab/Ac protein was obtained within the range of 0.5~12 ng·mL−1 (R2 = 0.992) (Fig. 5b). The limit of detection was 0.25 ng·mL−1 (3σ method). Compared with the results measured by commercial Cry1Ab/Ac ELISA kit (Fig. S5), this fluorescence ELISA assay offers a slightly wider range of Cry1Ab/Ac protein concentration.

Fig. 5
figure 5

a Fluorescence spectra (λexem = 410/515 nm) of the detecting system with the increasing concentrations of Cry1Ab/Ac protein (from top to bottom: 0, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, 10, 12.5, 20, 25 and 30 ng·mL−1). b Linear range of I0-I against concentrations of Cry1Ab/Ac protein from 0.5 to 12.5 ng·mL−1. I and I0 was the fluorescence intensity of the detecting system in the presence and absence of Cry1Ab/Ac protein, respectively

Rice is an important crop and widely planted in the world. In order to further evaluate the reliability and practicability, the detection method was used to detect the Cry1Ab/Ac protein in the rice leaf extraction. The results are given in Table 1, which indicated that this PDs assay is potential to be an alternative to the conventional TMB-based colorimetric method in real sample analysis.

Table 1 The results of Cry1Ab/Ac protein in rice leaf samples with different concentrations

Conclusion

An efficient polymer dot-based fluorescent nanoprobe was built for the determination of HRP activity and glucose. The detection was achieved by a turn-off pattern based on IFE effect between PDs and PPDox oxidized from PPD. The HRP assay was successfully applied in the HRP-based fluorescent ELISA for Cry1Ab/Ac protein determination and rice leaves analysis. The practicability of this assay demonstrated its potential in the detection of other important protein by the combination of ELISA. This PD-based fluorescence nanoprobe threw a light on the practical application of nanomaterials in bioanalysis.