Abstract
Introduction
Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and hyperglycemic hyperosmolar syndrome (HHS) are life-threatening complications of diabetes mellitus. Their clinical profiles have not been fully investigated.
Methods
A multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted in 21 acute care hospitals in Japan. Patients included were adults aged 18 or older who had been hospitalized from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2016 due to DKA or HHS. The data were extracted from patient medical records. A four-group comparison (mild DKA, moderate DKA, severe DKA, and HHS) was performed to evaluate outcomes.
Results
A total of 771 patients including 545 patients with DKA and 226 patients with HHS were identified during the study period. The major precipitating factors of disease episodes were poor medication compliance, infectious diseases, and excessive drinking of sugar-sweetened beverages. The median hospital stay was 16 days [IQR 10–26 days]. The intensive care unit (ICU) admission rate was 44.4% (mean) and the rate at each hospital ranged from 0 to 100%. The in-hospital mortality rate was 2.8% in patients with DKA and 7.1% in the HHS group. No significant difference in mortality was seen among the three DKA groups.
Conclusions
The mortality rate of patients with DKA in Japan is similar to other studies, while that of HHS was lower. The ICU admission rate varied among institutions. There was no significant association between the severity of DKA and mortality in the study population.
Trial Registration
This study is registered in the UMIN clinical Trial Registration System (UMIN000025393, Registered 23th December 2016).
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Hyperglycemic emergencies are serious acute complications of diabetes that include diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and hyperglycemic hyperosmolar syndrome (HHS) [1]. DKA is characterized by hyperglycemia, metabolic acidosis, and ketonemia while HHS presents with severe hyperglycemia, high serum osmolality, and dehydration [2], which require close monitoring of electrolytes and vital signs. Clinical characteristics of patients with hyperglycemic emergencies have been investigated in several studies, although not thoroughly described. Typically, DKA is common among young patients with type 1 diabetes while HHS often occurs in the elderly with type 2 diabetes. Common precipitating factors of hyperglycemic emergencies are infection, non-compliance, or acute conditions such as stroke, myocardial infarction, and trauma [3, 4]. Additionally, many drugs such as corticosteroids and antipsychotic medications have been reported to impair glucose tolerance [5]. These factors affect not only the pathophysiology of the hyperglycemic crisis but also the overall prognosis. Although these precipitating factors have been suggested, the actual prevalence of these factors in patients with hyperglycemic emergencies is unknown.
The epidemiology and management of patients with acute hyperglycemic emergencies vary among countries. The reported mortality rate of patients with DKA in developed countries ranges from 0.16% to 4.1% [6,7,8], whereas in developing countries it is higher [9, 10]. HHS-related mortality is reported to be 10–20%, approximately 10 times higher than that of DKA [3, 11]. Trends in the rate of hospitalization and use of intensive care for patients with DKA and HHS vary by country and variation exists even among institutions in the same region [12, 13]. Interestingly, these variations were reported not to affect the length of hospital stay or mortality of the patients [13]. Currently, there is no consensus regarding whether to use the ICU for the care of such patients, leaving optimal resource allocation in controversy [14]. Some consider that emergency departments or even general wards can provide an appropriate level of care with improved cost-effectiveness compared to admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) [15].
The aim of this study is to provide a detailed clinical profile of patients with DKA and HHS and the use of the ICU for these patients in Japan. We particularly focused on the patients’ background, short-term outcomes, and medical resources used.
Methods
Study design
A retrospective cohort study was conducted to investigate the clinical characteristics of patients with hyperglycemic emergencies. Participating facilities included 21 acute care hospitals in Japan. This is a part of the CLORINE study (The effect of fluid therapy on kidney function in hyperglycemic emergencies, a multicenter retrospective study), registered in the UMIN clinical trial registration system (UMIN000025393).
Patients
Patients included in the study were adults aged 18 years or older admitted to the hospital due to DKA or HHS from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2016. Individuals who received treatment in the emergency department were also included. Patients were initially identified according to ICD-10 coding. Subsequently, diagnoses were confirmed with laboratory data according to the criteria of the American Diabetes Association as follows:
DKA (meets all below)
-
Serum glucose > 250 mg/dl
-
pH of arterial blood gas (ABG) ≤ 7.30 or HCO3 ≤ 18 mmol/L
-
Positive urine or blood ketone
HHS (meets all below)
-
Serum glucose > 600 mg/dl
-
pH of ABG > 7.30 and HCO3 > 18 mmol/L
-
Negative or low positive urine/blood ketone
Patients with DKA were also classified into three groups: severe (ABG pH < 7.0 or HCO3 < 10 mmol/L), mild (ABG pH > 7.25 and HCO3 < 10 mmol/L), and moderate (neither mild nor severe) for analysis. Exclusion criteria were missing data necessary for diagnosis.
Outcomes and data collection
The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality from any cause. Secondary outcomes were serious complications including cardiovascular events, infection, length of hospital stay and ICU stay, and use of intensive therapy (ventilator, vasopressors, and renal replacement therapy).
Data were obtained through patient medical records in participating facilities. Data extraction for each patient included patient characteristics, type, duration, and treatment of diabetes, complications of diabetes, precipitating factors for hyperglycemic emergencies (including factors associated with patient behavior, acute medical events, and medications affecting diabetes), admission route and type of ward, complications during hospitalization, and requirement for intensive therapy. Medications affecting diabetes were defined as corticosteroids, atypical antipsychotics, thiazides, quinolones, and phenytoin. Complications were limited to newly diagnosed adverse events during hospitalization, excluding comorbidities that existed prior to admission. For patients who died, causes of death were also recorded.
Statistical analysis
Continuous variables were presented with a mean (± SD: standard deviation) and median (IQR: interquartile range) as appropriate. Categorical variables were expressed with percentages. Clinical features and outcomes were compared among the four groups (HHS and the 3 groups of DKA stratified by severity). The precipitating factors prior to hyperglycemic emergencies were also compared between the patients with known diabetes and new-onset diabetes. The type of admission ward is aggregated by each institution. On the basis of the normality of the data, continuous variables were analyzed with the ANOVA or the Kruskal–Wallis test for four-group comparisons. For categorical data, the chi-square test was used. P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed using R version 4.0.3 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
Results
During the study period, 771 patients were admitted to participating hospitals with DKA (545 patients) and HHS (226 patients). Among patients with DKA, 19% (n = 104) were mild, 23.7% (n = 129) were moderate, and 57.2% (n = 312) were severe. The mean age of the patients was 58.3 years (SD 19.3) and the proportion of males was 54.7%. Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of the patients. Compared with the DKA groups, patients with HHS were older (52.7 years vs. 71.9 years, p < 0.001) and had more comorbidities, including hypertension (31.9% vs. 57.2%, p < 0.001), ischemic heart disease (4.9% vs. 16.1%, p < 0.001), chronic heart failure (3.6% vs. 18.0%, p < 0.001), and stroke (5.8% vs. 25.0%, p < 0.001).
The duration of diabetes varied among the patients. While the proportion of new onset diabetes was 23.6%, 32.9% of the patients had been treated for more than 10 years. Type 2 diabetes was prevalent in the HHS group (81.8%) and type 1 diabetes was most frequent in the severe DKA group (52.5%). Regarding treatment before admission, the proportion of patients receiving insulin therapy is higher in DKA groups, while oral medication was common in the HHS group. A total of 284 (36.8%) patients had taken no medications to treat diabetes mellitus prior to hospital admission.
In terms of factors precipitating a hyperglycemic emergency, poor adherence to treatment, infectious diseases, and excessive intake of sugar-sweetened beverages were major factors (Table 2). Poor adherence was most prevalent in the DKA groups (47.7%) and infectious diseases were the most frequent factor in the HHS group (42.7%). Some patients took medications that could increase the severity of diabetes. Corticosteroids were prescribed for 6.2% of patients with HHS, and the proportion was higher than in patients with DKA. As shown in Supplemental Table, excessive drinking of sugar sweetened beverages was seen more frequently in new-onset diabetes cases in comparison with known diabetics (41.7% vs. 19.0%, p < 0.001). Whereas infectious disease is more prevalent in known diabetics (26.1% vs. 37.8%, p = 0.007).
Outcomes during hospital admission are shown in Table 3. The median hospital stay was 16 days [IQR 10–26 days] and was longer in the HHS group compared to the DKA groups (19.5 days vs. 15 days, p < 0.001). The ICU admission rate was 44.4% on average and highest in the severe DKA group (55.1%), with a p value of < 0.001. ICU admission rate in each hospital ranged from 0 to 100% (Fig. 1). The median ICU stay was 3 days, the same for all groups.
With regard to intensive therapy, 52 (6.7%) patients were mechanically ventilated, 68 (8.8%) were treated with vasopressors, and 24 (3.1%) required RRT. Six (0.7%) patients needed maintenance dialysis on discharge. Overall, patients in the severe DKA group required mechanical ventilation more frequently compared to the other groups (p < 0.001).
In the entire cohort, 31 (4%) patients died during admission. The in-hospital mortality rate was 2.8% in patients with DKA and 7.1% in the HHS group, respectively. No significant difference was seen among the DKA groups (p = 0.94). The most common complication was infection (18%), followed by pulmonary edema (2.7%), stroke (2.1%), ventricular arrhythmia (1.6%), and deep vein thrombosis (1%). Figure 2 shows in-hospital events (mortality + complications) according to the groups. The rate of events was higher in the HHS group than in other groups and was similar among the 3 DKA groups (not proportional to severity).
The causes of mortality are presented in Table 4. Twenty (65%) of 31 deaths were due to infection. Other causes included stroke, pulmonary edema, acute coronary syndrome, and ventricular arrhythmia.
Discussion
The present study describes the clinical characteristics of patients with hyperglycemic crises using data obtained from multiple institutions in Japan. The mortality rate of patients with DKA and HHS was 2.8% and 7.1%, respectively. No linear relationship was found between the severity of DKA and mortality. Major precipitating factors of acute episodes were poor adherence to treatment regimens, infections, and intake of excessive sugar-sweetened beverages. The rate of ICU admission varied among institutions.
The mortality rate of patients with DKA and HHS varies among countries and has changed over time. In recent publications, the mortality rate of patients with DKA has been reported from 0.16% to 4.1% [6,7,8], whereas that of HHS was between 10 and 20% [3, 11]. The results of the present study are similar to previous reports for DKA, but the mortality rate of patients with HHS in the present study was lower. The reason for this difference is unclear but could be explained by global trends in improving diabetes care. Although there have been few studies on the prognosis of HHS recently, a report based on a US national survey showed that the mortality rate of patients with DKA was decreasing while hospitalization was increasing [7]. This improvement might be attributed to increased awareness of the disease and adaption of established guidelines for the treatment of patients with hyperglycemic crises.
It is unclear if severity of DKA correlates with mortality or not. While some studies indicated an association between them [8, 16], other studies found that other factors were more important than DKA severity. For example, a previous study of a prediction model for the prognosis of patients with DKA concluded that coexisting severe diseases are the most significant predictor for mortality [17]. Another study suggested that advanced age and altered levels of consciousness were important predictors of mortality as well as electrolyte disturbances [18]. In the present study, the severe DKA group was younger and the prevalence of comorbidities such as stroke was lower compared with the other DKA groups. Considering the findings of the present study and previous reports, the severity of DKA may be less important than other factors such as patient age or comorbidities.
Treatment in the ICU has been considered appropriate for patients with hyperglycemic crises for decades as noted in the guidelines which were published by American Diabetes Association in 2009 [19]. The essentials of treatment for hyperglycemic crises are fluid resuscitation, electrolyte replacement, and insulin infusion, which require close monitoring of vital signs, electrolytes, and blood glucose levels. However, recent studies have shown that DKA can be safely managed in the emergency department [20] or even in general wards [21]. We found that ICU utilization for these patients by institution was quite varied, ranging from 0 to 100%. Such a discrepancy may reflect variations in practice and setting of each hospital. A study including 159 hospitals in the United States also reported ICU admission rates from 2.1 to 87.7%, but no association was found between the rates of ICU utilization and mortality or length of hospital stay [13]. Another large retrospective study involving 15,022 patients with DKA showed that institutions that utilized ICUs more frequently had higher costs but no improvement in-hospital mortality [22]. As far as proper triage and management are provided, where care is provided for these patients could be less important. Nevertheless, it should be emphasized that patients who need organ support or have severe comorbidities are suitable for management in the ICU [14]. As the present study suggests, a considerable number of patients required mechanical ventilation, vasopressor use, and renal replacement therapy. Patient profile and conditions also affect prognosis, which should be considered. Past reports suggested that older age, sepsis, coma and lower levels of activity of daily living, and severe comorbidities were risk factors for mortality [17, 23]. Accordingly, the use of organ support as well as patient background should be taken into account for the selection of providing care in the ICU.
In the present study, more than 20% of the patients reported excessive consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages prior to hyperglycemic emergencies. Both patients’ behavior and medical illnesses are important triggers for hyperglycemic emergencies [24, 25]. Previous reports identified poor adherence and infection as common precipitants [2, 26, 27]. Recent studies demonstrated that increased consumption of sweet soft drinks worsens insulin resistance and impairs pancreatic beta-cell function [28, 29], which is related to the pathophysiology of decompensated hyperglycemia. Although the exact prevalence was not documented in previous studies, the results of the present study suggest that excessive consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages may be a significant trigger for developing DKA and HHS.
The present study shows the proportion of patients who were taking medications that could worsen diabetes. Several types of medication, e.g., corticosteroids [30], beta blockers [31], anti-psychotics [32], thiazides [33], quinolones [34], and phenytoin [5], have been reported to be associated with deterioration of diabetes control. Although the overall prevalence of drug-induced diabetes is unknown, approximately 15–50% of patients taking corticosteroids and 10% of people taking anti-psychotic medications develop diabetes [35, 36]. Some studies have also described patients with drug-induced DKA and HHS [37, 38]. We reviewed prescriptions for the patients with diabetes requiring emergency admission and found that a few patients were taking such medications. Although corticosteroids were prescribed in 6% of patients with HHS, only a small number of patients were taking other medications which could affect diabetes. Given that other precipitating factors are more frequent, the impact of these drugs may be less important in the context of the overall acute critical episodes.
To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the largest and most detailed epidemiological studies of hyperglycemic crises in the medical literature. The strengths of this study are the large sample size and comprehensive description of patient characteristics including precipitating factors, medical resources used, and complications during hospitalization. However, the present study has also acknowledged limitations. First, multivariable regression analysis could not be conducted due to the low incidence of mortality. As a result, predictors of mortality or association between ICU admission and outcomes were not investigated. Considering the low mortality rate, studies with a much larger population such as a nationwide database will be needed to conduct multivariable regression analysis. Second, since the inclusion criteria included hyperglycemia, the present study did not enroll patients with euglycemic DKA which is currently an emerging problem [39]. However, this may be a minor issue because most of the study period was before the widespread use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors which are a major trigger for euglycemic DKA [40]. Third, this study lacks data regarding the healthcare provider's specialty (e.g. endocrinologist or general practitioner), history of diabetes education or referrals to a dietician, and prior hospitalizations for diabetes. These factors may have impacted the incidence and outcomes of hyperglycemic crises, which should be investigated in future studies.
Conclusions
The present study describes the clinical profile of patients with DKA and HHS in acute care hospitals in Japan. The mortality rate of patients with DKA was similar while that of HHS was lower compared to previous studies. No significant association was seen between the severity of DKA and mortality, which suggests that other factors are more important for prognosis. We found excessive consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages as a new precipitating factor of hyperglycemic crises. This risky behavior should be noted in future educational guides for the dietary habits of patients with diabetes. The indications for ICU admission should be based not only on the severity of disease but also on patient background and the need for organ support. Further studies are needed regarding the epidemiology of acute diabetic emergencies as it changes over time.
Data availability
The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Kitabchi AE, Umpierrez GE, Murphy MB, Kreisberg RA (2006) Hyperglycemic crises in adult patients with diabetes: a consensus statement from the American diabetes association. Diabetes Care 29:2739–2748. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc06-9916
French EK, Donihi AC, Korytkowski MT (2019) Diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperosmolar hyperglycemic syndrome: review of acute decompensated diabetes in adult patients. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l1114
Pasquel FJ, Umpierrez GE (2014) Hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state: a historic review of the clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment. Diabetes Care 37:3124–3131. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc14-0984
Dhatariya KK, Nunney I, Higgins K et al (2016) National survey of the management of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) in the UK in 2014. Diabet Med 33:252–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.12875
Fathallah N, Slim R, Larif S et al (2015) Drug-induced hyperglycaemia and diabetes. Drug Saf 38:1153–1168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-015-0339-z
Gibb FW, Teoh WL, Graham J, Lockman KA (2016) Risk of death following admission to a UK hospital with diabetic ketoacidosis. Diabetologia 59:2082–2087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-016-4034-0
Benoit SR, Zhang Y, Geiss LS, Gregg EW, Albright A (2018) Trends in diabetic ketoacidosis hospitalizations and in-hospital mortality—United States, 2000–2014. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 67(12):362. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6712a3
Barski L, Nevzorov R, Rabaev E et al (2012) Diabetic ketoacidosis: clinical characteristics, precipitating factors and outcomes of care. Isr Med Assoc J 14:298–302
Mekonnen GA, Gelaye KA, Gebreyohannes EA, Abegaz TM (2022) Treatment outcomes of diabetic ketoacidosis among diabetes patients in Ethiopia. Hosp Based Study PLoS One 17:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264626
Siregar NN, Soewondo P, Subekti I, Muhadi M (2018) Seventy-two hour mortality prediction model in patients with diabetic ketoacidosis: a retrospective cohort study. J ASEAN Fed Endocr Soc 33:124–129. https://doi.org/10.15605/jafes.033.02.03
Fadini GP, de Kreutzenberg SV, Rigato M et al (2011) Characteristics and outcomes of the hyperglycemic hyperosmolar non-ketotic syndrome in a cohort of 51 consecutive cases at a single center. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 94:172–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2011.06.018
Venkatesh B, Pilcher D, Prins J et al (2015) Incidence and outcome of adults with diabetic ketoacidosis admitted to ICUs in Australia and New Zealand. Crit Care 19:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-1171-7
Gershengorn HB, Iwashyna TJ, Cooke CR et al (2012) Variation in use of intensive care for adults with diabetic ketoacidosis. Crit Care Med 40:2009–2015. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e31824e9eae
Mendez Y, Surani S, Varon J (2017) Diabetic ketoacidosis: Treatment in the intensive care unit or general medical/surgical ward? World J Diabetes 8:40. https://doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v8.i2.40
Zhou VL, Shofer FS, Desai NG et al (2019) Predictors of short intensive care unit stay for patients with diabetic ketoacidosis using a novel emergency department-based resuscitation and critical care unit. J Emerg Med 56:127–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.09.048
George JT, Ajay Kumar Mishra RI (2018) Correlation between the outcomes and severity of diabetic ketoacidosis: a retrospective pilot study. J Fam Med Prim Care 7:787–790. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_116_18
Efstathiou SP, Tsiakou AG, Tsioulos DI et al (2002) A mortality prediction model in diabetic ketoacidosis. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 57:595–601. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2265.2002.01636.x
Novida H, Setiyawan F, Soelistijo SA (2021) A prediction model of mortality in patients hospitalized with diabetic ketoacidosis in a tertiary referral hospital in Surabaya, Indonesia. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol 15:2519–2526. https://doi.org/10.37506/ijfmt.v15i2.14751
Kitabchi AE, Umpierrez GE, Miles JM, Fisher JN (2009) Hyperglycemic crises in adult patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care 32:1335–1343. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc09-9032
Haas NL, Whitmore SP, Cranford JA et al (2020) An emergency department-based intensive care unit is associated with decreased hospital and intensive care unit utilization for diabetic ketoacidosis. J Emerg Med 58:620–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.10.005
Braatvedt G, Kwan A, Dransfield W et al (2019) Differing protocols of managing adult diabetic ketoacidosis outside of the intensive care unit make no difference to the rate of resolution of hyperglycaemia and acidosis. N Z Med J 132:13–23
Chang DW, Shapiro MF (2016) Association between intensive care unit utilization during hospitalization and costs, use of invasive procedures, and mortality. JAMA Intern Med 176:1492–1499. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.4298
Sato Y, Morita K, Okada A et al (2021) Factors affecting in-hospital mortality of diabetic ketoacidosis patients: a retrospective cohort study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 171:108588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108588
Yamada K, Nonaka K (1996) Diabetic ketoacidosis in young obese Japanese men. Diabetes Care 19:671
Tanaka K, Moriya T, Kanamori A, Yajima Y (1999) Analysis and a long-term follow up of ketosis-onset Japanese NIDDM patients. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 44:137–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-8227(99)00023-6
Wachtel TJ, Tetu-Mouradjian LM, Goldman DL et al (1991) Hyperosmolarity and acidosis in diabetes mellitus—a 3 year experience in Rhode Island. J Gen Intern Med 6:495–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02598216
Randall L, Begovic J, Hudson M et al (2011) Recurrent diabetic ketoacidosis in inner-city minority patients: behavioral, socioeconomic, and psychosocial factors. Diabetes Care 34:1891–1896. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc11-0701
Yoshida M, McKeown NM, Rogers G et al (2007) Surrogate markers of insulin resistance are associated with consumption of sugar-sweetened drinks and fruit juice in middle and older-aged adults. J Nutr 137:2121–2127. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/137.9.2121
den Biggelaar LJCJ, Sep SJS, Mari A et al (2020) Association of artificially sweetened and sugar-sweetened soft drinks with β-cell function, insulin sensitivity, and type 2 diabetes: the Maastricht Study. Eur J Nutr 59:1717–1727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-019-02026-0
Hwang JL, Weiss RE (2014) Steroid-induced diabetes: a clinical and molecular approach to understanding and treatment. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 30:96–102. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.2486
Sarafidis PA, Bakris GL (2006) Antihypertensive treatment with beta-blockers and the spectrum of glycaemic control. QJM 99:431–436. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcl059
Lean MEJ, Pajonk F-G (2003) Patients on atypical antipsychotic drugs. Diabetes Care 26:1597–1605. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.26.5.1597
Shafi T, Appel LJ, Miller ER et al (2008) Changes in serum potassium mediate thiazide-induced diabetes. Hypertension 52:1022–1029. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.119438
Chou HW, Wang JL, Chang CH et al (2013) Risk of severe dysglycemia among diabetic patients receiving levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, or moxifloxacin in Taiwan. Clin Infect Dis 57:971–980. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cit439
Bonaventura A, Montecucco F (2018) Steroid-induced hyperglycemia: an underdiagnosed problem or clinical inertia? A narrative review. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 139:203–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2018.03.006
Manu P, Correll CU, Van Winkel R et al (2012) Prediabetes in patients treated with antipsychotic drugs. J Clin Psychiatry 73:460–466. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.10m06822
Vuk A, Kuzman MR, Baretic M, Osvatic MM (2017) Diabetic ketoacidosis associated with antipsychotic drugs: case reports and a review of literature. Psychiatr Danub 29:121–135. https://doi.org/10.24869/psyd.2017.121
Chinthapalli K, Newey A, Krause M (2015) Corticosteroid induced hyperosmolar hyperglycaemic state and hemiballismus. Oxford Med Case Rep 2015:320–322. https://doi.org/10.1093/omcr/omv051
Peters AL, Buschur EO, Buse JB et al (2015) Euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis: a potential complication of treatment with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibition. Diabetes Care 38:1687–1693. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc15-0843
Nasa P, Chaudhary S, Shrivastava PK, Singh A (2021) Euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis: a missed diagnosis. World J Diabetes 12:514–523. https://doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v12.i5.514
Acknowledgements
Not applicable
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
KT collected and analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. NU designed the study and collected and analyzed the data. MS designed and directed the project. SU analyzed the data and supervised the manuscript. NY, TT, NN, HK, SO, KY, HY, SK, HT, NF, TK, TI, TK, KE, TM, TO, MH, AH, TM, YM, AY, TW, TU, TK, and TS collected and analyzed the data. AKL supervised the manuscript and provided a reliable edit to correct English language errors. All authors checked and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
The study design was approved by the ethics committee of Jichi Medical University (ID: RINS17-023. Registered 4th September 2017) and each institution with a waiver of informed consent prior to collecting the data. The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Informed consent
Due to the nature of the retrospective study, informed consent is waived, which was approved by the ethics commitiy in each institution. Instead, we kept all data completely anonymous and provided opportunities for opting out of the study.
Additional information
Managed By Massimo Federici.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Takahashi, K., Uenishi, N., Sanui, M. et al. Clinical profile of patients with diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperglycemic hyperosmolar syndrome in Japan: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Acta Diabetol 61, 117–126 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-023-02181-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-023-02181-1