Abstract
Backgrounds
The goal of this study was to compare trapeziectomy alone to trapeziectomy associated with a technique of suspensionplasty using the abductor pollicis longus with a minimum of 6 years of follow-up in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint.
Methods
Our series included 46 trapeziectomies in 35 patients, aged 69 years in average, among which 27 were women. In 27 cases group I, a trapeziectomy alone was performed, and in 19 cases group II, a trapeziectomy associated with an abductor pollicis longus suspensionplasty was performed.
Results
At the last follow-up, the difference between pre- and postoperative Quick DASH was − 36.104 in average in group I and − 38.877 in average in group II p = 0.7717. The difference between pre- and postoperative pain was − 3.926 in average in group I and − 4.368 in average in group II p = 0.35. The difference of pre- and postoperative thumb opposition was 0.630 in group I and 0.421 in group II p = 0.3033. The average difference of pre- and postoperative key pinch was 0.389 in group I and 0.842 in group II p = 0.3303. No complication was reported.
Conclusions
Our results suggest that it is unnecessary to perform a ligamentoplasty when a trapeziectomy is indicated.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Many articles have been published reporting numerous techniques for the surgical treatment of osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint [1, 2]. Most authors compare trapeziectomy to prosthetic implants [3, 4]. Some compare different techniques of ligamentoplasties associated with trapeziectomy [5]. Other authors compare trapeziectomy alone compared to a technique of suspensionplasty of the flexor carpis radialis [6] or interposition of the palmaris longus [7]. Only one study compared trapeziectomy alone to trapeziectomy associated with a tendon interposition of the abductor pollicis longus but with a short follow-up of 13 months in average [8]. The goal of this study was to compare trapeziectomy alone to a technique of abductor pollicis longus tendon interposition with a minimum follow-up of 6 years.
The primary hypothesis of this study was that the improvement in the Quick DASH after trapeziectomy alone for the surgical treatment of osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint was at least as good as after trapeziectomy associated with a tendon interposition of abductor pollicis longus. Secondary hypotheses were that the improvement in pain, Kapandji thumb opposition score and key pinch after trapeziectomy alone for the surgical treatment of osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint were at least as good as after trapeziectomy associated with an abductor pollicis longus suspensionplasty.
Methods
All medical records of patients treated in our department for osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint between 2007 and 2010 were studied. Were excluded patients under 18, pregnant women, patients treated by prosthetic implant or osteotomy of the trapezium, patients with chronic systemic illnesses. All patients treated by trapeziectomy alone or associated with an abductor pollicis longus suspensionplasty were included. Our series included 46 trapeziectomies in 35 patients aged 69 years in average ranging from 45 years old to 90 years old, among which 27 were women and 8 were men. Eleven trapeziectomies were performed on both sides (Tables 1 and 2).
All patients were operated under locoregional anesthesia in outpatient surgery using a dorsal approach as described by Cantero. In 27 cases group I, a trapeziectomy alone was performed (Fig. 1). In 19 cases group II, a trapeziectomy associated with an abductor pollicis longus suspensionplasty was performed as described by Thompson [9] (Fig. 2). An immobilization by a commissural splint was left in place for 1 month in both groups and followed by self-rehabilitation.
The method of evaluation consisted in measuring the preoperative and at the last follow-up Quick DASH ranging from 0 normal function of the upper limb to 100 severe dysfunction of the upper limb, the pain on a numeric analogic scale ranging from 0 no pain to 10 worst imaginable pain, Kapandji thumb opposition score ranging from 0 to 10 [10], key pinch strength in Kg. Complications were reported.
The statistical analysis consisted in comparing four quantitative, matched variables in the two groups. Tests of normality Shapiro–Wilk, Kolmogorov–Smirnov have demonstrated that the distribution of the two groups was normal. A Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare the averages in both groups with a threshold of significance at 0.05.
Results
The results are presented in Tables 3 and 4.
At the last follow-up, the average Quick DASH was 27.016/100 standard deviation = 10.334 in group I and 15.19/100 standard deviation = 18.282 in group II. The difference was not significant with p = 0.055. The difference between pre- and postoperative Quick DASH was − 36.104 standard deviation = 30.847 in average in group I and − 38.877 standard deviation = 15.853 in group II. The difference was not significant with p = 0.7717.
The average pain was 2.481/10 standard deviation = 1.528 in group I and 2.157/10 standard deviation = 1.883 in group II. The difference was not significant with p = 0.503. The difference between pre- and postoperative pain was − 3.926 standard deviation = 2.630 in average in group I and − 4.368 standard deviation = 2.006 in average, in group II. The difference was not significant with p = 0.35.
The average thumb opposition score was 9.555/10 standard deviation = 0.8 in group I and 9.263/10 standard deviation = 1.194 in group II. The difference was not significant with p = 0.501. The difference between pre- and postoperative thumb opposition score was 0.630 standard deviation = 1.079 in average, in group I, and 0.421 standard deviation = 0.961 in average, in group II. The difference was not statistically significant with p = 0.3033.
The average key pinch was 4.25 kg standard deviation = 1.943 in group I and 4 kg standard deviation = 1.309 in group II. The difference was not statistically significant with p = 0.239. The difference between pre- and postoperative key pinch was 0.389 standard deviation = 2.367 in average, in group I, and 0.842 standard deviation = 2.977 in average, in group II. The difference was not statistically significant with p = 0.3303.
No complication or surgical revision was reported in either groups.
Discussion
Although some authors report excellent results using prosthetic implants for the surgical treatment of the osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint [11, 12], others report poor results with surgical revisions occurring from 7 to 35% of cases [13, 14]. In the light of those controversies, trapeziectomy remains the technique of Ref. [2]. The debate about trapeziectomy relies on the association of a suspensionplasty or interposition.
The main argument of the supporters of suspensionplasty or interposition is to preserve the scaphometacarpal space [15, 16]. Some authors have demonstrated that suspension and interposition techniques did not enable to maintain the scaphometacarpal space in the long term [17]. Others have shown that long-term results of suspensionplasties of flexor carpis radialis did preserve a larger scaphometacarpal space compared to a trapeziectomy alone, but that clinical results were not influenced by the height of the scaphometacarpal place [18]. A meta-analysis comparing trapeziectomy alone to trapeziectomy associated with ligamentoplasty or suspensionplasty did not show significant results in terms of pain, thumb opposition score and key pinch [19]. It has been demonstrated that patients operated using a trapeziectomy alone are less prone to complications than those operated with a technique associating a suspensionplasty [19]. Trapeziectomy alone should remain the preferred technique for the surgical treatment of osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint after failure of a well-conducted medical treatment [20]. Under these conditions, the goal of our study was to evaluate the relevance of techniques of suspensionplasty by comparing trapeziectomy alone compared to a technique of abductor pollicis longus suspensionplasty.
Our results have proven that regardless of the clinical criteria, Quick DASH, pain, range of motion and key pinch, no statistically significant difference was found between the two techniques. The weaknesses of our study are the limited number of cases and the fact that we compared only one type of suspensionplasty to trapeziectomy alone. The strength of this study is that the follow-up is over 6 years and that the groups of patients are homogenous.
The main hypothesis of this study was verified as there was no statistically significant difference of Quick DASH after trapeziectomy alone compared to trapeziectomy associated with an abductor pollicis longus suspensionplasty. Our secondary hypotheses were verified as there were no significant differences between the two techniques in terms of improvement in pain, thumb opposition and key pinch.
Our results therefore suggest that the association of a suspensionplasty to a trapeziectomy is irrelevant.
References
Martou G, Veltri K, Thoma A (2004) Surgical treatment of osteoarthritis of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 1142:421–432
Wajon A, Carr E, Edmunds I, Ada L (2009) Surgery for thumb (trapeziometacarpal joint) osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD004631
Junior WGP, Chaim RM, de Carvalho HBF, Albertoni WM, Faloppa F, Santos JBGD (2012) Arthroplasty for trapezium excision and tendon interposition in rhizarthrosis cases: prospective study. Rev Bras Ortop 46:75–82
De Smet L, Vandenberghe L, Degreef I (2013) Long-term outcome of trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI) versus prosthesis arthroplasty for basal joint osteoarthritis of the thumb. Acta Orthop Belg 79:146–149
Li YK, White C, Ignacy TA, Thoma A (2011) Comparison of trapeziectomy and trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition: a systematic literature review. Plast Reconstr Surg 1281:199–207
Salem HM, Davis TRC (2014) Degenerative change at the pseudarthrosis after trapeziectomy at 6-year followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 4724:1160–1165
Gangopadhyay S, McKenna H, Burke FD, Davis TRC (2012) Five- to 18-year follow-up for treatment of trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: a prospective comparison of excision, tendon interposition, and ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition. J Hand Surg Am 373:411–417
Belcher HJ, Nicholl JE (2000) A comparison of trapeziectomy with and without ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition. J Hand Surg Br 254:350–356
Diao E (2001) Trapezio-metacarpal arthritis Trapezium excision and ligament reconstruction not including the LRTI arthroplasty. Hand Clin 172:223–236
Kapandji A (1986) Clinical test of apposition and counter-apposition of the thumb. Ann Chir Main 51:67–73 (French)
Santos C, Pereira MA, Silva LFNP, Claro RMT, Trigueiros MNAC, da Silva JCF (2011) Surgical treatment of rhizarthrosis: trapeziectomy with or without ligamentoplasty versus total prosthesis. Rev Bras Ortop 461:83–86
Vandenberghe L, Degreef I, Didden K, Fiews S, De Smet L (2013) Long term outcome of trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction/tendon interposition versus thumb basal joint prosthesis. J Hand Surg Eur 388:839–843
Hansen TB, Snerum L (2008) Elektra trapeziometacarpal prosthesis for treatment of osteoarthrosis of the basal joint of the thumb. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 426:316–319
Kaszap B, Daecke W, Jung M (2013) Outcome comparison of primary trapeziectomy versus secondary trapeziectomy following failed total trapeziometacarpal joint replacement. J Hand Surg Am 385:863–871
Kuhns CA, Emerson ET, Meals RA (2003) Hematoma and distraction arthroplasty for the thumb basal joint osteoarthritis: a prospective, single-surgeon study including outcomes measures. J Hand Surg Am 283:381–389
Sirotakova M, Figus A, Elliot D (2007) A new abductor pollicis longus suspension arthroplasty. J Hand Surg Am 321:12–22
Pomares G, Delgrande D, Dap F, Dautel G (2016) Minimum 10-year clinical and radiological follow-up of trapeziectomy with interposition or suspensionplasty for basal thumb arthritis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 1028:995–1000
Salem H, Davis TRC (2012) Six year outcome excision of the trapezium for trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis: is it improved by ligament reconstruction and temporary Kirschner wire insertion? J Hand Surg Eur 373:211–219
Wajon A, Vinycomb T, Carr E, Edmunds I, Ada L (2015) Surgery for thumb (trapeziometacarpal joint) osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev 2:CD004631
Davis TR, Brady O, Dias JJ (2004) Excision of the trapezium for osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint: a study of the benefit of ligament reconstruction or tendon interposition. J Hand Surg Am 296:1069–1077
Acknowledgements
Mickaël Schaeffer, Public Health Department, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, is gratefully acknowledged for performing the statistical analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Philippe Liverneaux has conflicts of interest with Newclip Technics, Argomedical, Biomodex, Zimmer Biomet. Louis Barthel, Juan José Hidalgo Diaz, Paul Vernet, Stéphanie Gouzou, Sybille Facca and Yuka Igeta have no conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barthel, L., Hidalgo Diaz, J.J., Vernet, P. et al. Results of the treatment of first carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis: trapeziectomy alone versus trapeziectomy associated with suspensionplasty. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 28, 1555–1561 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-018-2173-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-018-2173-3