Abstract
Purpose
Safe treatment of giant central thoracic disc herniations (cTDHs) remains a surgical challenge due to frequent calcifications, intradural extension and, importantly, the rare exposure of spine surgeons to these lesions. We report our 10-year experience in the management of giant cTDH by mini-thoracotomy and offer a detailed description of the technique.
Methods
17 patients harboring 17 giant cTDH operated on via a mini-thoracotomy at the authors’ institution between 2004 and 2014 were reviewed. All patients presented with myelopathy of varying magnitude. Mean patient age was 47 years. The mean follow-up period was 5.5 years. Median canal compromise of the cTDH was 66 %. cTDH were densely calcified in 7 (41 %), partially calcified in 6 (35 %) and soft in 4 (24 %) patients. Intradural extension of cTDH was noted in six patients (35 %). Benzels’ modified myelopathy score of the Japanese Orthopedic Association was adjusted for the evaluation of thoracic myelopathy (mJOA) to assess functional outcomes.
Results
Successful removal of the offending cTDH was achieved in all patients. The overall mJOA Score improved from 7.9/13 to 11.1/13. Two patients with giant and densely calcified cTDH experienced a transient post-operative neurological decline. There was a statistically significant correlation between size of cTDH and intradural extension.
Conclusion
Patients with myelopathy due to giant cTDH can be safely treated by the mini-thoracotomy approach. Postoperative neurological worsening and severe complications or incisional pain are rare. In contrast to complex posterior or thoracoscopic approaches, the mini-thoracotomy is technically straightforward and thus easy to learn for experienced spine surgeons.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Thoracic disc herniations are frequently encountered as incidental findings in spinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [1]. However, symptomatic disc herniations at the thoracic spine are very rare compared to their cervical and lumbar counterparts and account for only a small percentage of disc surgeries [2–5]. The incidence of symptomatic TDH is thought to be as low as 1:1,000,000 patient years [6, 7].
A diversified armamentarium of surgical techniques has been developed to address any given type of disc herniation in any patient by the least invasive and safest way. Among them are transpedicular [8–10] and transfacet pedicle-sparing [11, 12] approaches, costotransversectomy [5, 15], lateral extracavitary [13], transthoracic [14–24] and thoracoscopic [25–27], and, finally transsternal [28] approaches.
Giant thoracic disc herniations—defined as compromising more than 40 % of the spinal canal as measured on axial computed tomography (CT) by Hott et al. [19]—are a subset of thoracic disc herniations typically presenting with myelopathy, high amount of calcification and frequent intradural extension. They expose the patient to a considerable risk of neurological injury and the surgeon to specific challenges. Here, we report our experience in the management of this exceptionally rare condition in 17 consecutive patients treated between 2004 and 2014 using a mini-thoracotomy approach.
Methods
Patient population
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (618/14).
Clinical, radiographic and surgical characteristics of all patients who underwent a transthoracic resection of a giant TDH were retrospectively retrieved. Seventeen patients harboring 17 cTDH were operated on via a mini transthoracic approach in the authors’ department between January 2004 and May 2014. The patient population consisted of 12 women and 5 men with a median age of 47 years (range 31–74). Four patients (22 %) had a history of a previous severe trauma (three motor vehicle accidents, one fall from a stair case). Patient, disc, treatment and outcome characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The median follow-up was 5.5 years (range 0.2–9.3 years).
Surgical technique: the mini-transthoracic approach
All patients are positioned in the lateral position after induction of general anesthesia. Care is taken to attain an as true as possible lateral position. The side of the approach is chosen according to the laterality of the prolapse. In this series, 10 right-sided and 7 left-sided mini-thoracotomies were performed. As the approach is directed to the posterior aspect of the vertebral bodies, anatomical obstacles related to the side of exposure (i.e. vena cava, aorta, thoracic duct) are not encountered. Both lungs are ventilated throughout the procedure. Intraoperative SSEP and MEP monitoring are routinely performed. Localization of the disc space of interest is performed by fluoroscopic C-arm imaging counting up from the sacrum. A radio-opaque plumb line that intersects the target disk space is dropped to the thoracic skin level under anterior-posterior fluoroscopy. A skin incision of approximately 6–8 cm is carried out parallel to the rib that is perpendicular to the affected level. Of note, this is frequently not the rib corresponding to the vertebral bodies of the segment affected by the cTDH. The rib is displayed and the intercostal muscles incised. Resection of the rib is not necessary as long as the intercostal muscle is incised long enough. The pleura is incised, the lung is retracted manually and the blades of the retractor system (SynFrame, Synthes Spine, Paoli, PA, USA) are introduced into the thoracic cavity gently and progressively retracting the lung. The head of the rib and the lateral aspect of the vertebral body are visualized. The retractor blades are centered over the disc space of interest and secured. The level is fluoroscopically confirmed. All following steps are performed under microscopic view. The parietal pleura is incised in a door-shaped fashion. Resection of the rib head is done using the chisel. This exposes the pedicle and neuroforamen. In select cases, the rib head only needs to be partially removed. A box-shaped cavity is created—opening the spinal canal ventrally of the TDH—by drilling of the bone and partial resection of the disc (usually 1 × 1 cm) on the posterior aspect of the adjacent upper and lower vertebral bodies. The dimensions of the cavity must at least be large enough to allow visualization of the entire ventral dura and are further determined by the size of the disc pathology which has to be retracted anteriorly into the cavity before removing it through the lateral approach (Fig. 1). Decompression of the dura is now performed by gently manipulating herniated disc fragments into the cavity. As the disc material and the posterior longitudinal ligament are tightly adherent in most of the cases the ligament is cut cranial and caudal of the disc space after coagulating and cutting the epidural veins. In case of intradural extension of the herniated disc the tight adhesion mostly includes the dura. In those cases it is often possible to dissect large amount of the adhered dura from the ligament. In most cases it is still necessary to resect parts of the dura around the intradural part of the prolapse. Dural closure is performed by tissue patch graft as there is usually no remnant anterior dura allowing suture. The osteotomy defect can be filled with autograft collected from the rib head and the vertebral bodies. A chest tube is inserted, the dissected ribs are “narrowed” by tight sutures around the two neighboring ribs and the wound is closed in layers.
Outcome measures
The Japanese Orthopeadic Association Scale as modified by Benzel et al. [29] was used to assess patient outcome. It was further modified for the specific evaluation of thoracic myelopathy by omitting the score for the upper extremity. The final scoring system, hereafter termed mJOA, is shown in Table 2. Bowel and sexual dysfunction, despite its well-recognized and self-explanatory relevance in patients suffering from myelopathy, is not integrated in commonly used spine scales [30]. We therefore set up an additional scoring for both bowel and sexual dysfunction (Table 2b, lower row). To allow for comparison with other studies, we did not include these measures into the mJOA score.
Statistical analysis
Unpaired Students t test or Kruskal–Wallis non-parametric ANOVA was used for comparison of differences between groups for parametric data. Non-parametric data were analyzed by Fisher exact or Mann–Whitney U test. All tests were two-sided. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistics were performed using GraphPad Prism version 5 Statistical Software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, USA).
Results
Clinical presentation
The clinical presentation of the 17 patients operated on via the described approach is presented in Fig. 2. The time between onset of symptoms and establishment of the diagnosis was highly variable and ranged from an immediate diagnosis due to an acute onset of paraparesis and 5.5 years (median, 6 months). All patients presented with myelopathy. Sensory deficits were present in 16 (94 %) and paraparesis of varying severity was present in 8 (47 %). Three patients (18 %) presented with monoparesis. Upon admission, three patients were unable to walk. Spastic gait or hyperreflexia of the lower limbs was found in nine patients (53 %). Urinary symptoms were reported by six patients (35 %) and consisted of partial or severe incontinence. Voiding difficulty was not observed. Partial fecal incontinence was present in three patients (18 %) and one patient reported marked constipation. Fourteen patients were willing to respond to questions about their sexual function throughout the disease course (10 women and 4 men). Three of them reported severe impairment (e.g. complete loss of potency/sexual dysfunction), five reported mild impairment (potency disturbance/sexual dysfunction) and six normal sexual function. Pain was a leading symptom in 13 patients. Axial back pain was present in 12 patients, accompanied by radicular pain in six of them. Only one patient presented with radicular pain in the absence of axial back pain.
Disc characteristics
Median compromise of the spinal canal by the cTDH was 66 % (range 42–94 %). The size of the cTDH was positively correlated to intradural extension (Fig. 3a). We found three subtypes of cTDH with respect to calcification: cTDH occurred as either densely calcified, partially calcified or without calcification (termed soft cTDH) (Fig. 3b). Although there was a tendency towards calcification with increasing size of the herniated disc, this difference was not statistically significant (Fig. 3c). The number of cases included in this study is too small to allow for a valid statistical analysis but there was an obvious correlation between dense calcification and intradural extension of the disc herniation (Fig. 3d). Intradural extension was noted in 5 of 7 densely calcified disc herniations compared to only 1 of 6 partially and 0 of 4 soft cTDH. Of note, a non-significant trend towards a longer time-to-diagnosis with increasing calcification was found.
Surgical characteristics and outcome
Median operative time was 245 min (range 130–363 min). No blood transfusions were required. Surgical complications occurred in two patients. One patient suffered from a pleural CSF fistula. Surgical revision and sealing of the dural leak with fibrin glue successfully resolved the fistula. Another patient suffered from a pleural effusion and required drainage by reinsertion of a chest tube for several days.
The neurological outcome is summarized in Fig. 4. The pre-operative mJOA was 7.9/13. There was a non-significant decline in overall mJOA immediately after surgery to 7.7/13, a non-significant improvement to 8.4/13 at discharge and a significant and marked improvement to 10.4/13 after 3 months. A slight further increase to a final mJOA of 11.1/13 was noted at the last available follow-up (Fig. 4a). Sensory deficits improved significantly in all patients and the recovery was faster compared to the motor deficits (Fig. 4b, c). Urinary, bowel and sexual dysfunctions also improved following surgery but the recovery measured did not attain statistical significance. No patient remained with a urinary or fecal incontinence (Fig. 4d, e). Severe sexual dysfunction in 1 of 3 patients presenting with this condition.
A relevant post-operative neurological deterioration occurred in two patients (11.8 %). Both had a good pre-operative neurological status (mJOA 10 and 11 respectively) and had large (canal compromise of 80 and 90 % respectively) and densely calcified herniated discs with intradural extension. They suffered from severe paraparesis immediately after the operation. The course of their neurological decline and recuperation is shown by the arrows in Fig. 4a. One of them was not able to walk upon discharged but returned to a good functional status within 3 months and regained the pre-operative level (mJOA 11/13) after 6 months (black arrow, Fig. 4a). The second patient had a delayed recovery. She regained ambulation after 6 months following the operation and recovered to a mJOA of 8/13 (dotted arrow, Fig. 4a).
Discussion
Today, the history of surgery for TDH overlooks more than 100 years. The path to the successful management of this rare condition is characterized by unacceptable results of early dorsal approaches followed—decades later—by pioneering innovations. Surgery evolved from dorsal strategies towards posterolateral, lateral and anterior (e.g. transthoracic) approaches to reach the good outcomes reported throughout the world today.
The continuous refinement of the surgical strategies by specialists in the field has given birth to a highly differentiated armamentarium of surgical solutions tailored to any type of disc herniation and affected individual. This way, paracentral and lateral disc herniations, and potentially smaller non-calcified cTDH can now be safely managed by posterior pedicle-sparing approaches avoiding the potential morbidity of a transthoracic approach [31]. For giant cTDH in turn, especially when densely calcified, the transthoracic route remains the optimal approach as only this allows a true anterior spinal cord decompression [32].
The last decade has seen an increasing popularity of thoracoscopic approaches for TDH. The appealing theoretical benefits of thoracoscopy over thoracotomy (e.g. becoming less invasive causing less incisional pain and allowing faster recovery) have not been met in practice [14, 19]. However, thoracoscopic procedures are difficult to learn and regular exposure to this technique is required to preserve the skill. As symptomatic TDH are extremely rare training a team of staff surgeons is not realistic in most spine centers around the world. This is highly relevant since rapid neurological decline is not uncommon in patients with cTDH requiring emergent surgery. We therefore believe that the benefits of the mini-thoracotomy and its variations [20, 23]—microscopic view with ideal visualization of the pathology and application of classic microsurgical skills—turn it into the ideal instrument for the management of cTDH and outweigh the questionable advantages of thoracoscopy.
Previously reported series of surgical management of TDH typically mix all types of disc herniations. Commonly, the size of the disc herniations is not reported but absence of myelopathy in the majority of these cases and the focus being on pain improvement suggests that the number of giant TDH included was usually small.
Hott et al. [19] were the first to address the specific clinical features and surgical challenges of giant TDH. In line with their series of 20 giant TDH (16 were centrally located), further 15 cases of giant TDH reported by Zhao et al. [24], 17 giant TDH reported by Russo et al. [33] and a series of seven TDH by Moran et al. [34] myelopathy was the leading symptom in all patients from the present series. Calcifications and intradural extension are highly prevalent in giant TDH. Hott et al. changed their strategy from a thoracoscopic approach to thoracotomy after neurological complications were encountered in patients managed thoracoscopically. Hott et al. further describe that “most cases require a two level corpectomy”. Our own experience is that even with densely calcified cTDH of large sizes a box-shaped osteotomy of about 1 × 1 cm as described above is sufficient to remove the pathology and decompress the spinal cord. While Hott et al. and Zhao et al. performed lateral plate osteosynthesis (and—in part—vertebral body replacement) in all of their reported cases of giant cTDH, instability does not seem to be an issue using the technique presented here as no patient in our series required a subsequent instrumentation.
The pathophysiology of TDH is poorly understood [35, 36]. Particularly conflicting data exist on the association between preceding accidents and TDH. Taken together, 14 older series reported an antecedent trauma in 37 % of patients [12, 36]. Contrarily, Cornips et al. [37] reported an associated trauma in only 3 % of patients in a large series of TDH. Four of 17 patients (24 %) in the present series had a history of a severe trauma, mostly motor vehicle accidents, supporting the hypothesis that TDH can be associated to trauma.
Conclusion
Giant cTDH occupy a special rank in the field of TDH. While pain is a common reason to indicate surgery for smaller and paracentral TDH, myelopathy is the leading symptom in patients with giant cTDH making surgical intervention mandatory. The likelihood of intradural extension and calcification complicating the surgical removal increases with the size of the cTDH. While representing a particular surgical challenge, these pathologies can still be safely managed using the mini-thoracotomy approach. Postoperative worsening is rare and mostly temporary. The obvious advantages of this procedure—the optimal anterior exposure and the applicability of common microsurgical skills—outweigh the potential benefits of less invasive approaches (e.g. thoracoscopy or dorso-lateral approaches). Furthermore, the straightforward nature of this procedure makes it easier to learn and apply for experienced spine surgeons which is essential to provide this surgical technique as an emergency service.
References
Williams MP, Cherryman GR, Husband JE (1989) Significance of thoracic disc herniation demonstrated by MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 13:211–214
Simpson JM, Silveri CP, Simeone FA et al (1993) Thoracic disc herniation. Re-evaluation of the posterior approach using a modified costotransversectomy. Spine 18:1872–1877
Stillerman CB, Weiss MH (1992) Management of thoracic disc disease. Clin Neurosurg 38:325–352
Kim KD, Babbitz JD, Mimbs J (2000) Imaging-guided costotransversectomy for thoracic disc herniation. Neurosurg Focus 9:e7
Perot PL, Munro DD (1969) Transthoracic removal of midline thoracic disc protrusions causing spinal cord compression. J Neurosurg 31:452–458. doi:10.3171/jns.1969.31.4.0452
Albrand OW, Corkill G (1979) Thoracic disc herniation. Treatment and prognosis. Spine 4:41–46
Carson J, Gumpert J, Jefferson A (1971) Diagnosis and treatment of thoracic intervertebral disc protrusions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 34:68–77
Jho HD (2000) Endoscopic transpedicular thoracic discectomy. Neurosurg Focus 9:e4
Le Roux PD, Haglund MM, Harris AB (1993) Thoracic disc disease: experience with the transpedicular approach in twenty consecutive patients. Neurosurgery 33:58–66
Patterson RH, Arbit E (1978) A surgical approach through the pedicle to protruded thoracic discs. J Neurosurg 48:768–772. doi:10.3171/jns.1978.48.5.0768
Bransford R, Zhang F, Bellabarba C et al (2010) Early experience treating thoracic disc herniations using a modified transfacet pedicle-sparing decompression and fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 12:221–231. doi:10.3171/2009.9.SPINE09476
Stillerman CB, Chen TC, Couldwell WT et al (1998) Experience in the surgical management of 82 symptomatic herniated thoracic discs and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 88:623–633. doi:10.3171/jns.1998.88.4.0623
Schmidt MH, Larson SJ, Maiman DJ (2004) The lateral extracavitary approach to the thoracic and lumbar spine. Neurosurg Clin N Am 15:437–441. doi:10.1016/j.nec.2004.04.007
Bartels RHMA, Peul WC (2007) Mini-thoracotomy or thoracoscopic treatment for medially located thoracic herniated disc? Spine 32:E581–E584. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31814b84e1
Bohlman HH, Zdeblick TA (1988) Anterior excision of herniated thoracic discs. J Bone Joint Surg Am 70:1038–1047
Currier BL, Eismont FJ, Green BA (1994) Transthoracic disc excision and fusion for herniated thoracic discs. Spine 19:323–328
Deviren V, Kuelling FA, Poulter G, Pekmezci M (2011) Minimal invasive anterolateral transthoracic transpleural approach: a novel technique for thoracic disc herniation. A review of the literature, description of a new surgical technique and experience with first 12 consecutive patients. J Spinal Disord Tech 24:E40–E48. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e318220af6f
Fidler MW, Goedhart ZD (1984) Excision of prolapse of thoracic intervertebral disc. A transthoracic technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 66:518–522
Hott JS, Feiz-Erfan I, Kenny K, Dickman CA (2005) Surgical management of giant herniated thoracic discs: analysis of 20 cases. J Neurosurg Spine 3:191–197. doi:10.3171/spi.2005.3.3.0191
Kasliwal MK, Deutsch H (2011) Minimally invasive retropleural approach for central thoracic disc herniation. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 54:167–171. doi:10.1055/s-0031-1284400
Nacar OA, Ulu MO, Pekmezci M, Deviren V (2013) Surgical treatment of thoracic disc disease via minimally invasive lateral transthoracic trans/retropleural approach: analysis of 33 patients. Neurosurg Rev 36:455–465. doi:10.1007/s10143-013-0461-2
Otani K, Yoshida M, Fujii E et al (1988) Thoracic disc herniation. Surgical treatment in 23 patients. Spine 13:1262–1267
Uribe JS, Smith WD, Pimenta L et al (2012) Minimally invasive lateral approach for symptomatic thoracic disc herniation: initial multicenter clinical experience. J Neurosurg Spine 16:264–279. doi:10.3171/2011.10.SPINE11291
Zhao Y, Wang Y, Xiao S et al (2013) Transthoracic approach for the treatment of calcified giant herniated thoracic discs. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 22:2466–2473. doi:10.1007/s00586-013-2775-8
Gille O, Soderlund C, Razafimahandri HJC et al (2006) Analysis of hard thoracic herniated discs: review of 18 cases operated by thoracoscopy. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 15:537–542. doi:10.1007/s00586-005-1014-3
Quint U, Bordon G, Preissl I et al (2012) Thoracoscopic treatment for single level symptomatic thoracic disc herniation: a prospective followed cohort study in a group of 167 consecutive cases. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 21:637–645. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-2103-0
Rosenthal D, Dickman CA (1998) Thoracoscopic microsurgical excision of herniated thoracic discs. J Neurosurg 89:224–235. doi:10.3171/jns.1998.89.2.0224
Sundaresan N, Shah J, Feghali JG (1984) A transsternal approach to the upper thoracic vertebrae. Am J Surg 148:473–477
Benzel EC, Lancon J, Kesterson L, Hadden T (1991) Cervical laminectomy and dentate ligament section for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Spinal Disord 4:286–295
Vitzthum H-E, Dalitz K (2007) Analysis of five specific scores for cervical spondylogenic myelopathy. Eur Spine J 16:2096–2103. doi:10.1007/s00586-007-0512-x
Yoshihara H (2014) Surgical treatment for thoracic disc herniation: an update. Spine 39:E406–E412. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000171
Snyder LA, Smith ZA, Dahdaleh NS, Fessler RG (2014) Minimally invasive treatment of thoracic disc herniations. Neurosurg Clin N Am 25:271–277. doi:10.1016/j.nec.2013.12.006
Russo A, Balamurali G, Nowicki R, Boszczyk BM (2012) Anterior thoracic foraminotomy through mini-thoracotomy for the treatment of giant thoracic disc herniations. Eur Spine J 21:212–220. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2263-6
Moran C, Ali Z, McEvoy L, Bolger C (2012) Mini-open retropleural transthoracic approach for the treatment of giant thoracic disc herniation. Spine 37:E1079–E1084. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182574657
Overvliet GM, Beuls EAM, Ter Laak-Poort M, Cornips EMJ (2009) Two brothers with a symptomatic thoracic disc herniation at T11–T12: clinical report. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 151:393–396. doi:10.1007/s00701-009-0244-2
McInerney J, Ball PA (2000) The pathophysiology of thoracic disc disease. Neurosurg Focus 9:e1
Cornips EMJ, Janssen MLF, Beuls EAM (2011) Thoracic disc herniation and acute myelopathy: clinical presentation, neuroimaging findings, surgical considerations, and outcome. J Neurosurg Spine 14:520–528. doi:10.3171/2010.12.SPINE10273
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roelz, R., Scholz, C., Klingler, JH. et al. Giant central thoracic disc herniations: surgical outcome in 17 consecutive patients treated by mini-thoracotomy. Eur Spine J 25, 1443–1451 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4380-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4380-0