Abstract
The arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis is a very common association between plant roots and soil fungi, which greatly contributes to plant nutrition. Root-exuded compounds known as strigolactones act as symbiotic signals stimulating the fungus prior to root colonization. Strigolactones also play an endogenous role in planta as phytohormones and contribute to the regulation of various developmental traits. Structure-activity relationship studies have revealed both similarities and differences between the structural features required for bioactivity in plants and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. In the latter case, bioassays usually measured a stimulation of hyphal branching on isolated fungi of the Gigaspora genus, grown in vitro. Here, we extended these investigations with a bioassay that evaluates the bioactivity of strigolactone analogs in a symbiotic situation and the use of the model mycorrhizal fungus Rhizophagus irregularis. Some general structural requirements for bioactivity reported previously for Gigaspora were confirmed. We also tested additional strigolactone analogs bearing modifications on the conserved methylbutenolide ring, a key element of strigolactone perception by plants. A strigolactone analog with an unmethylated butenolide ring could enhance the ability of R. irregularis to colonize host roots. Surprisingly, when applied to the isolated fungus in vitro, this compound stimulated germ tube elongation but inhibited hyphal branching. Therefore, this compound was able to act on the fungal and/or plant partner to facilitate initiation of the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis, independently from hyphal branching and possibly from the strigolactone pathway.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Strigolactones (SLs) are carotenoid-derived compounds produced by plants and exuded by roots into the rhizosphere. They were first characterized as germination stimulants for seeds of the parasitic weeds Striga and Orobanche (Cook et al. 1966). It was later discovered that SLs also stimulate arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi (Akiyama et al. 2005; Besserer et al. 2006), which develop a root endosymbiosis with most land plants and play important roles in natural and agricultural ecosystems (Smith and Read 2008; Chen et al. 2018). More recently still, SLs were identified as a novel class of phytohormones, contributing to the control of shoot branching (Gomez-Roldan et al. 2008; Umehara et al. 2008) and a number of other developmental traits in shoots and roots (Lopez-Obando et al. 2015; Matthys et al. 2016). The bioactivity of SLs on such diverse organisms raises interesting questions about the evolution of their perception.
Since the identification of SLs as phytohormones, genetics has allowed rapid progress in the understanding of their biosynthesis, perception and hormonal effects (Seto and Yamaguchi 2014; Al-Babili and Bouwmeester 2015; Bürger and Chory 2020). The core biosynthetic pathway from β-carotene to SLs involves, after cis/trans isomerization by DWARF27, two Carotenoid Cleavage Dioxygenase (CCD) enzymes. CCD7 carries out a first cleavage step yielding 9-cis-β-apo-10′-carotenal, which is processed by CCD8 into the common SL precursor carlactone (Alder et al. 2012; Bruno et al. 2017). From that step, the pathway diverges among plant species to afford a diversity of SL forms (Jia et al. 2018).
Over 30 different natural SLs have been described to date (Yoneyama et al. 2018; Xie et al. 2019; Mori et al. 2020), and numerous chemically synthesized analogs are available (Takahashi and Asami 2018). Canonical SLs comprise four carbon rings named A to D. This general structure is mimicked in GR24 (Fig. 1a), a synthetic compound used as a universal analog in SL studies (Johnson et al. 1981; Zwanenburg and Pospísil 2013). In known natural SLs, the ABC tricyclic lactone is linked by an enol ether bridge to an invariable methylbutenolide D ring. While the C ring can adopt a β- or an α-orientation, all natural SLs have the same R-configuration at the C-2′ position, which corresponds to the configuration of their common precursor carlactone (Flematti et al. 2016). Non-canonical SLs comprise an enol-ether-D-ring moiety but lack the A, B or C rings, and include carlactone as their simplest form (Yoneyama et al. 2018).
Structure-activity relationship studies have been carried out to link SL structural features with their bioactivity on different organisms. Each study used a different set of SL analogs and measured particular biological responses on a given species. Still, some general conclusions can be drawn from these data. Hormonal activities in pea, rice and Arabidopsis have generally been measured on SL-deficient ccd8 mutants (rms1, d10 and max4, respectively). In all three plant species, bioactivity largely depends on the methylbutenolide D ring associated with an enol ether unit. At the other end of this enol ether bridge, the C ring can be replaced by an acyclic moiety without substantial loss of activity (Boyer et al. 2012; Boyer et al. 2014; Umehara et al. 2015). The importance of stereochemistry varies among plant species (Flematti et al. 2016). As for variations on the D ring, the conserved methyl group at C4′ is absolutely required to suppress outgrowth of pea buds (Boyer et al. 2012). The importance of the D ring has been further supported by recent studies on plant SL receptors (de Saint Germain et al. 2016; Yao et al. 2016). These receptors, called D14 in rice and Arabidopsis, DAD2 in Petunia and RMS3 in pea, belong to the alpha-beta fold hydrolase family of proteins (Arite et al. 2009; Hamiaux et al. 2012; Nakamura et al. 2013; Zhao et al. 2013). In a proposed mode of action of these receptors, a nucleophilic attack on the D ring results in the cleavage of SLs and the release of the ABC moiety. The D ring forms a transient covalent linkage with the receptor and is later released as hydroxymethylbutenolide (De Saint Germain et al. 2016; Yao et al. 2016; Seto et al. 2019). The use of profluorescent SL analogs has revealed that the conserved methyl at position C4′ on the D ring strongly influences this hydrolytic process (De Saint Germain et al. 2016; Yao et al. 2018). SL receptors of root parasitic weeds seem to share their general properties, including hydrolytic activity, with SL receptors from other plants (Yao et al. 2017; Xu et al. 2018).
Ancient paralogs of SL receptors are involved in the perception of chemically related signals called karrikins (Bythell-Douglas et al. 2013). Karrikins are produced upon combustion of plant material and possess like SLs a butenolide moiety. In an ecological context, karrikins stimulate seed germination of some plant species and thereby facilitate vegetation recovery following wildfires. They turned out to be of broader interest when it was discovered that Arabidopsis mutants in the karrikin receptor KAI2 exhibit germination and seedling development phenotypes, suggesting that a yet unidentified signal (termed karrikin-like or KAI2 ligand, KL) exists in plants to regulate these developmental steps (Conn and Nelson 2016). Interestingly, in addition to the perception of karrikins and KL, KAI2 is involved in the response to a subset of SL stereoisomers (namely those with a 2′S configuration, Scaffidi et al. 2014). A final and very intriguing observation is that rice mutants in the karrikin receptor KAI2 are unable to develop AM symbiosis (Gutjahr et al. 2015). At this stage, it remains unclear whether the cause of this phenotype is the absence of the protein itself or a defect in the perception of a fungus- or plant-derived signal.
The discovery of a role for SLs in AM symbiotic signalling stemmed from the observation that AM fungi grown in vitro exhibit profuse hyphal branching in the vicinity of host roots. This morphological response can be reproduced to some extent in isolated fungi grown in vitro and treated with root exudates mixed into the medium or applied locally near hyphal tips (Nagahashi et al. 1996; Nagahashi and Douds 1999; Buée et al. 2000). SLs were later identified as essential components of the so-called ‘branching factor’ responsible for this effect (Akiyama et al. 2005; Besserer et al. 2006). Other fungal responses to SLs have been reported, such as increased spore germination (Besserer et al. 2006; Kountche et al. 2018) or the production of chitooligosaccacharides (Genre et al. 2013). Nevertheless, hyphal branching remains the classical bioassay to measure SL activity on AM fungi. It is mainly carried out on species of the genus Gigaspora, although hyphal branching induction by GR24 has also been documented in the model AM fungus Rhizophagus irregularis (Cohen et al. 2013). Structure-activity relationship studies on Gigaspora margarita have highlighted that linked ABC and D moieties were necessary for bioactivity, although the enol ether bridge between the C and D rings could be replaced by alkoxy or imino ethers (Akiyama et al. 2010a). Truncation of the A ring markedly reduced hyphal branching activity (Akiyama et al. 2010a). In contrast, the B and C rings appear partially dispensable, as attested by the activity of some carlactone derivatives (Mori et al. 2016) and other non-canonical strigolactones (Xie et al. 2019). Although canonical SLs are generally more active, some non-canonical SL forms can reach high levels of activity on AM fungi. For example, carlactonoic acid, which is exuded by a wide range of plant species, has been proposed to be a common inducer of hyphal branching (Yoneyama et al. 2018). It is also noteworthy that active SL analogs can trigger different hyphal branching patterns, stimulating the formation of short or long hyphae of different orders (Akiyama et al. 2010a; Mori et al. 2016; Xie et al. 2019).
In addition to this morphological response of AM fungi to SLs in vitro, the importance of SLs in AM symbiosis was first shown through the analysis of SL-deficient pea mutants. AM fungi displayed a reduced ability to colonize these mutants, reaching a level of root colonization of only one third of the level observed in WT plants (Gomez-Roldan et al. 2008). Therefore, in addition to their visible effects on fungal development in vitro, SLs are important for the symbiotic interaction to take place.
In this article, we focus on SL bioactivity on the AM fungus R. irregularis. We report the development of a novel bioassay to measure the activity of SL analogs in symbiotic conditions. We also extend previous structure-activity relationship studies by testing two new SL analogs bearing modifications on the D ring.
Materials and methods
Biological material
The study was carried out on Medicago truncatula Gaertn. transposon insertional mutants of the R108 genotype: ccd8-1, ccd7-1 and d14-1 (Lauressergues et al. 2015). Backcrossed homozygous ccd8-1 and ccd7-1 mutants were compared with their wild-type siblings. Homozygous d14-1 mutants were compared with wild-type R108. Seeds were sterilized and allowed to germinate for 24 h as described in Lauressergues et al. (2015).
Rhizophagus irregularis spores (strain DAOM197198) were purchased from Agronutrition (France). They were rinsed twice with sterile water before use.
Chemicals
(±)-GR24 was purchased from Chiralix (The Netherlands), and corresponding enantiopure stereoisomers were purchased from StrigoLab (Italy). The two other SL analogs (Fig. 1b) were synthesized as described in Boyer et al. (2012). All SL analogs were dissolved in acetone and stored at − 20 °C. Freshly prepared 1000× stock solutions in acetone were added to the nutrient solution. An identical volume of acetone was added to nutrient solution for the mock treatments.
Plant growth and AM inoculation
Seedlings were transferred to 50 mL Falcon tubes pierced at the bottom (three holes in the conical part of the tubes) and containing sterilized substrate (OilDri UK) inoculated with 150 spores of R. irregularis per plant: 75 spores mixed with the substrate and 75 spores added halfway up the Falcon tube. Each tube was inserted through the lid, pierced to the diameter of the Falcon tube, of a 150 mL pot containing 85 mL of nutrient solution. This volume was sufficient for the duration of the experiments (3 weeks). At the start of experiments, the nutrient solution level in pots reached roughly the lower 20 mL mark of the Falcon tubes, then it decreased gradually due to evaporation and plant growth. Throughout the experiments, the substrate acted as a coarse wick to keep all the tube content wet but aerated. At the time of harvest, the holes at the bottom of the tubes were still under the nutrient solution surface. The nutrient solution was a modified half-strength low-phosphate and low-nitrogen Long Ashton solution (Hewitt 1966), containing 7.5 μM Na2HPO4, 750 μM KNO3, 400 μM Ca(NO3)2, 200 mg/L MES buffer, pH 6.5. Treatments were applied by adding the tested compounds to the nutrient solution at the beginning of the experiment. The concentration of the tested compounds was 10−7 M unless otherwise stated. Plants were kept in a growth chamber under a 16 h photoperiod (light intensity: 300 μmol m−2 s−1). The temperature was set to 22 °C day and 20 °C night, with 70% humidity.
Staining and observation of mycorrhizal structures
Roots were harvested 3 weeks post-inoculation and carefully separated from the substrate. They were cleared in 10% KOH (w/v) for 3 days at room temperature and stained with Schaeffer black ink (Vierheilig et al. 1998) for 8 min at 95 °C. Whole root systems were examined under a Leica RZ75 stereomicroscope, and the total number of AM infection units was counted for each plant. Infection units were defined as areas of the root cortex that host fungal structures (arbuscules, but also vesicles and intraradical hyphae), and derive from a single epidermal penetration event (Kobae 2019).
Analysis of AM fungal development in vitro
Experiments were carried out in plates containing M medium (Bécard and Fortin 1988) without sucrose and solidified with 0.4% (w/v) phytagel. SL analogs (10−7 M), or the solvent alone for mock treatments, were added to the medium after autoclaving. Spores of R. irregularis were suspended in sterile water, and 10 μL droplets containing 1 to 5 spores were placed on the medium. Plates were incubated horizontally at 30 °C under 2% CO2 for 12 days. Germ tubes could easily be identified as the longest hypha coming out of each spore. Their length, from spore to tip and excluding any branches, was measured using ImageJ software after scanning the plates. The number of hyphal branches of the 1st order (growing from the germ tube) and 2nd order (growing from 1st-order branches) was determined using a dissecting microscope for each germinated spore. The average length of germ tubes and average number of branches of each order were calculated for all the germinated spores on a plate (typically 30 to 40 spores). For statistical analysis, each plate was treated as a replication unit (represented by the plate mean), and 11 plates were analysed for each treatment.
Statistical analyses
Data were analysed using Statgraphics Centurion software (SigmaPlus). Non-parametric tests were used because normality or homoscedasticity criteria were not met. Datasets were analysed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by pairwise comparisons with Dunn’s test.
Results
A novel bioassay to measure the effect of SLs on symbiosis initiation
We aimed to assess the bioactivity of SL analogs in a context of interaction with a host plant. To avoid any interference with endogenous SLs, we used as hosts M. truncatula mutants affected in the SL biosynthetic pathway. We have previously described ccd7-1 and ccd8-1 mutants of this species, which are affected in genes encoding two key enzymes in SL biosynthesis (Lauressergues et al. 2015). On average, Mtccd8-1 mutants inoculated with spores of R. irregularis exhibited after 3 weeks of co-culture only 2 root colonization events per plant, vs 21.7 in wild-type plants. Exogenous treatment with the SL analog (±)-GR24 supplied in the nutrient solution restored normal levels of root colonization (Fig. 2a). A similar defect in root colonization was observed with Mtccd7-1 mutants (Supp. Fig. 1a). In contrast, mutants carrying a mutation in the SL receptor D14 were normally colonized (Supp. Fig. 1b).
Bioactivity of SL analogs on symbiosis initiation: a structure-activity relationship study
The ability of (±)-GR24 to favour symbiosis initiation, i.e. to enhance root colonization of Mtccd8-1 mutants by R. irregularis (Fig. 2a), allowed us to use this experimental set-up as a bioassay to test the activity of other SL analogs. The first tested compounds were the ABC and D moieties of GR24, which can be generated by the hydrolase activity of plant SL receptors (Hamiaux et al. 2012). We observed that the tricyclic ABC lactone or the hydroxymethylbutenolide D ring supplied individually, or as an equimolar mix, were unable to restore R. irregularis ability to colonize roots of Mtccd8-1 mutants (Supp. Fig. 2).
We next tested the importance of SL stereochemistry. Synthetic SL analogs exist in four stereochemical configurations (Fig. 1a). We compared the biological activities of the four enantiopure stereoisomers of GR24. Three of them were highly active in symbiotic conditions, while (−)-GR24 was not significantly active as compared with the mock treatment (Fig. 2b).
We then evaluated two compounds bearing modifications on the conserved D ring part of SLs. A GR24 analog with a reduced C3′-C4′ bond, (±)-H2-2′-epi-GR24 (Fig. 1b; compound 35 in Boyer et al. 2012), was able to restore symbiosis initiation in Mtccd8-1 mutants inoculated with R. irregularis (Fig. 3a). Like (±)-GR24, (±)-H2-2′-epi-GR24 exhibited significant activity at the standard concentration of 10−7 M (Dunn’s test vs mock treatment, P = 0.017). However, its activity was not statistically significant at 10−8 M (P = 0.052).
Finally, we evaluated an analog lacking the conserved methyl group at C4′: (±)-4′-desmethyl-2′-epi-GR24 (Fig. 1b). This compound efficiently promoted the symbiosis between R. irregularis and M. truncatula (Fig. 3b). To compare the bioactivity of (±)-4′-desmethyl-2′-epi-GR24 to that of (±)-GR24, we used a dilution series of the two compounds. (±)-4′-desmethyl-2′-epi-GR24 was significantly active at concentrations down to 10−8 M (Dunn’s test, P = 0.003). Contrary to (±)-GR24, however, it failed to exhibit significant activity at 10−9 M (Fig. 3b).
Activity of (±)-4′-desmethyl-2′-epi-GR24 on fungal development in vitro
To investigate the effects of (±)-4′-desmethyl-2′-epi-GR24 on R. irregularis in terms of presymbiotic growth and hyphal morphology, we recorded fungal development from spores laid on solid medium and exposed to (±)-GR24, (±)-4′-desmethyl-2′-epi-GR24 or a mock treatment. The SL analogs were diluted into the medium rather than applied locally, which ensures uniform treatment of all spores and allows knowing precisely the SL concentration to which the fungus is exposed. After 12 days of incubation the germ tube was measured, and the number of 1st-order and 2nd-order hyphal branches was determined (Fig. 4). Treatment with (±)-GR24 increased the number of 1st- and 2nd-order branches (Fig. 4a). Germ tubes were shorter in R. irregularis treated with (±)-GR24 than in control fungi (Fig. 4b). In contrast, (±)-4′-desmethyl-2′-epi-GR24 stimulated the elongation of the germ tube (Fig. 4b), while the number of 1st-order and 2nd-order branches was lower than in the control treatment (Fig. 4a). On average across three repeats of the experiment shown in Fig. 4, (±)-4′-desmethyl-2′-epi-GR24 increased germ tube length by 23%. It triggered 2.1-fold and 6.5-fold reductions of the number of 1st-order and 2nd-order branches, respectively. Together, results presented in Fig. 4a and Fig. 3b indicate that this compound markedly inhibits hyphal branching, while it can efficiently restore fungal colonization of Mtccd8 mutant roots.
Discussion
In the present work, we aimed to extend previous structure-activity relationship studies for SL activity on AM fungi. These studies have essentially been based on in vitro hyphal branching assays. Although such tests are extremely sensitive to SLs and informative from the point of view of fungal development, the relevance of hyphal branching to the symbiosis has not yet been firmly established. It is therefore of interest to supplement these observations with an assessment of SL bioactivity in a context of interaction with a host plant. An obvious obstacle to this in wild-type plants is the presence of endogenous SLs that could mask the activity of added compounds. We thus took advantage of M. truncatula mutants affected in the SL biosynthesis pathway. Consistent with the fact that the CCD7 and CCD8 enzymes act consecutively in this pathway (Alder et al. 2012), Mtccd7-1 and Mtccd8-1 mutants display similar defects in mycorrhizal root colonization. Mtccd8 mutants were preferred for the rest of the study because CCD8 is to the best of our knowledge specifically involved in SL biosynthesis, while CCD7 activity can also lead to the formation of C14 and C13 apocarotenoids, which could be involved in the progression of AM intraradical colonization (Vogel et al. 2009; López-Ráez et al. 2015; Walter et al. 2007; Stauder et al. 2018). Unlike mutants in the SL biosynthesis pathway, mutants affected in the SL receptor D14 were not hampered in their ability to host mycorrhizal interactions (Supp. Fig. 1). This observation is consistent with the analysis of corresponding mutants in rice (Yoshida et al. 2012) and indicates that hormonal effects of SLs in planta are not required for the symbiosis to take place. Therefore, defective mycorrhizal colonization of Mtccd8-1 and Mtccd7-1 mutants can be attributed to insufficient stimulation of the fungal partner.
The reduced mycorrhizal capacity we observed in M. truncatula ccd8-1 mutants is more severe than that reported in corresponding mutants of other species like pea (Gomez-Roldan et al. 2008; Foo et al. 2013), rice (Yoshida et al. 2012; Kobae et al. 2018) or petunia (Kretzschmar et al. 2012). One hypothesis to explain this discrepancy could be the presence of biochemically undetectable residual SLs in some of those other mutants, or alternatively the production in these species of other compounds able to stimulate AM fungi. In any case, the very strong defect in mycorrhizal colonization observed with Mtccd8-1 mutants, together with the complete restoration of root colonization upon treatment with exogenous SLs (Fig. 2a), allowed the development of a reliable bioassay to assess the bioactivity of SL analogs in symbiotic conditions. Importantly, since the read-out is the number of root colonization sites, bioactivity encompasses the stimulation of any biological process allowing the fungus to progress from spore germination to successful root colonization.
A structure-activity relationship study was undertaken using this bioassay. All tested compounds were variations of the widely used SL analog GR24. In the first part of this study, we evaluated compounds that have already been tested for hyphal branching activity on G. margarita (Akiyama et al. 2010a). The ABC and D moieties, supplied individually or as an equimolar mix, were inactive (Supp. Fig. 2). Thus, SL cleavage products released upon SL perception by the host plant (and possibly by the fungus) do not by themselves stimulate the interaction between R. irregularis and M. truncatula. Among stereoisomers of GR24, (+)-GR24, (+)-2′-epi-GR24 and (−)-2′-epi-GR24 exhibited similar levels of bioactivity, while (−)-GR24 was inactive (Fig. 2b). These observations show consistency between hyphal branching tests (Akiyama et al. 2010a; Artuso et al. 2015) and our root colonization-based bioassay. They also indicate that the corresponding structural requirements are shared between R. irregularis and G. margarita. Preferences for SL stereochemical configurations vary across plant species (Boyer et al. 2012; Scaffidi et al. 2014; Umehara et al. 2015; Flematti et al. 2016). We did not observe such discrepancies among the two distant AM fungus species that have been considered so far, although available data are insufficient to conclude that stereochemical requirements are broadly conserved among AM fungi.
In the second part of the structure-activity relationship study, we included compounds bearing modifications on the methylbutenolide D ring. This invariable component of all known natural SLs is of utmost importance for SL perception by plants, but analogs with variations on this part of the molecule have not yet been tested on AM fungi. We first investigated the importance of the C3′-C4′ double bond of the D ring. Analysis of (±)-H2-2′-epi-GR24 revealed that reduction of the double bond resulted in a moderate decrease of bioactivity on R. irregularis (Fig. 3a). This effect was comparable with that observed on pea bud elongation (Boyer et al. 2012), while the loss of activity on rice tillering and on Striga and Orobanche seed germination was more pronounced (Umehara et al. 2015; Yamauchi et al. 2018). It was recently shown that the C3′-C4′ double bond could be reduced to a single bond in the presence of root exudates (Yamauchi et al. 2018). Because this yielded compounds with limited activity on shoot branching and parasitic seed germination (Boyer et al. 2012; Umehara et al. 2015; Yamauchi et al. 2018), it was postulated that this modification could represent a biochemical pathway to inactivate SLs. Given that the biological reduction of this double bond is less effective on natural SL forms (Yamauchi et al. 2018) and that the resulting compounds retain some activity on R. irregularis, this reduction process seems unlikely to interfere significantly with AM symbiotic signalling.
We then focused on the conserved methyl group at C4′ of the butenolide D ring. Based on the current understanding of the SL biosynthetic pathway, this methyl group comes from the SL precursor 9-cis-β-carotene (Bruno et al. 2017). Studying the effects of (±)-4′-desmethyl-2′-epi-GR24, which lacks this methyl group, led to the most striking observations in our study. Indeed, this compound retains high activity to promote the initiation of symbiosis, as well as on the isolated fungus. These results contrast with observations made on pea: removal of the methyl group at C4′ resulted in a complete loss of ability to suppress shoot branching in planta (Boyer et al. 2012) and altered the binding and hydrolytic properties of SL analogs with the pea SL receptor RMS3 (de Saint Germain et al. 2016).
Our observations of R. irregularis development in vitro raised interesting questions about the relevance of pre-symbiotic fungal development to the initiation of symbiosis. As expected, (±)-GR24 stimulated 1st- and 2nd-order branching (Fig. 4). This confirmed previous observations (Cohen et al. 2013) and showed that the experimental conditions were adequate to detect positive effects of SL analogs on hyphal branching. Interestingly, germ tubes were shorter in R. irregularis treated with (±)-GR24 than in control fungi, a response that to our knowledge has not been reported previously. In contrast, (±)-4′-desmethyl-2′-epi-GR24 stimulated elongation of the germ tube and inhibited the formation of new hyphal branches, which to our knowledge is a novel combination of effects. This complete contrast with the effects of (±)-GR24 may reflect a trade-off between hyphal branching and extension growth. Still, although some SL analogs stimulate the formation of long branches of low order rather than the formation of many short high-order branches (Akiyama et al. 2010a; Mori et al. 2016; Xie et al. 2019), an inhibition of branching is quite unusual. Such effects have been reported in root-exuded compounds from non-host species and were accompanied by a similar inhibition of hyphal growth (Akiyama et al. 2010b). In our case, the branching inhibition cannot be attributed to toxicity because treatment with the same compound stimulated germ tube elongation and enhanced fungal ability to colonize roots. Positive effects on hyphal elongation are common: root exudates and a number of compounds therein, like flavonoids, polyamines or jasmonate, trigger this response in Rhizophagus or Gigaspora species (Elias and Safir 1987; Scervino et al. 2005; Cheng et al. 2012; Nagata et al. 2016). Over the years, such effects have however not attracted as much attention as hyphal branching, which is considered a hallmark of fungal stimulation by its host. It is commonly assumed that hyphal branching itself is important to increase the chances for the fungus to encounter a host root, although this idea has not been supported by experimental evidence. Alternatively, hyphal branching could be a mere side-effect of important physiological or metabolic changes induced by SLs. Our observations challenge both hypotheses as they indicate that hyphal branching and root colonization capacity can be uncoupled. Another implication is that important bioactive compounds may have escaped identification due to the focus on hyphal branching in previous studies.
That (±)-4′-desmethyl-2′-epi-GR24 was active on isolated R. irregularis (Fig. 4) indicates the existence of a fungal signalling pathway for this compound. Furthermore, the effects are the opposite of those observed upon treatment with (±)-GR24. This rules out the possibility that the fungal SL receptor is simply permissive to the absence of the methyl group at C4′. Rather, it points towards a perception system that allows discriminating between C4′-methylated and unmethylated forms of GR24, activating two different pathways to trigger different biological responses. This situation brings to mind an interesting parallel with the activation of homologous, yet distinct pathways by SLs and karrikins in plants. The main active karrikin form in Arabidopsis, KAR2, is likely structurally similar to endogenous plant compounds such as the elusive KL. Its unmethylated butenolide moiety (Flematti et al. 2009) is identical to the D ring of (±)-4′-desmethyl-2′-epi-GR24, and the absence of a methyl group at C4′ is important to activate the KL rather than SL pathway in Arabidopsis (Yao et al. 2018). Like plants, AM fungi could possess two pathways to deal with methylated and unmethylated butenolides. If the ability of (±)-4′-desmethyl-2′-epi-GR24 to restore the symbiosis in Mtccd8 mutants is to be explained by effects on the fungus alone, this hypothesis implies that activation of the ‘unmethylated butenolide’ pathway somehow makes the SL pathway dispensable.
An alternative and non-exclusive possibility is that in addition to stimulating the fungus, (±)-4′-desmethyl-2′-epi-GR24 acts on the plant host to facilitate fungal entry into roots. This hypothesis is consistent with the importance of the receptor protein KAI2 for AM symbiosis in rice (Gutjahr et al. 2015). Its ortholog in Arabidopsis seems strongly involved in the perception of C4′-unmethylated butenolides such as KAR2 (Villaécija-Aguilar et al. 2019). Therefore, it can be envisaged that a KAI2 protein in M. truncatula responds to unmethylated butenolides in a way that favours root colonization by AM fungi. Such unmethylated butenolides would comprise (±)-4′-desmethyl-2′-epi-GR24 as well as potential plant- or fungus-derived signals. At this stage, we do not have data to either support or rule out this possibility.
Interestingly, untreated Mtccd8-1/R. irregularis co-cultures failed to establish a successful interaction, but the exogenous supply of either (±)-GR24 or (±)-4′-desmethyl-2′-epi-GR24 was sufficient to restore the symbiosis. This suggests that, in addition to the expected absence of SLs, natural equivalents of (±)-4′-desmethyl-2′-epi-GR24 or their receptors are absent or inactive in these co-cultures. Further investigations will be needed to understand how the two fungal pathways, and possibly a plant pathway responding to (±)-4′-desmethyl-2′-epi-GR24, interplay to allow the initiation of symbiosis.
In conclusion, our structure-activity relationship analysis on the broad requirements for SL structure and stereochemical configuration was congruent with previous hyphal branching assays. A focus on D ring modifications, however, revealed that hyphal branching is not always a good proxy to estimate symbiosis-relevant bioactivity. This study also highlighted the importance of the methyl group on the D ring and the ability of methylated and unmethylated variants to trigger differential developmental responses in the fungus. Once again, as in many key studies on SL perception by plants, synthetic analogs were instrumental to unravel new biological events. Ultimately, deciphering the perception of SLs and other butenolides by AM fungi should shed light on how these compounds evolved to become both important regulators of plant development and interkingdom mediators.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- SL:
-
Strigolactone
- AM:
-
Arbuscular mycorrhiza
- WT:
-
Wild-type
- KL:
-
KAI2 ligand
References
Akiyama K, Matsuzaki K, Hayashi H (2005) Plant sesquiterpenes induce hyphal branching in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Nature 435:824–827. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03608
Akiyama K, Ogasawara S, Ito S, Hayashi H (2010a) Structural requirements of strigolactones for hyphal branching in AM fungi. Plant Cell Physiol 51:1104–1117. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcq058
Akiyama K, Tanigawa KT, Hayashi H (2010b) Lupin pyranoisoflavones inhibiting hyphal development in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Phytochemistry 71:1865–1871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochemistry.2010.08.010
Al-Babili S, Bouwmeester HJ (2015) Strigolactones, a novel carotenoid-derived plant hormone. Annu Rev Plant Biol 66:161–186. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-043014-114759
Alder A, Jamil M, Marzorati M, Bruno M, Vermathen M, Bigler P, Ghisla S, Bouwmeester H, Beyer P, Al-Babili S (2012) The path from β-carotene to carlactone, a strigolactone-like plant hormone. Science 335:1348–1351. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1218094
Arite T, Umehara M, Ishikawa S, Hanada A, Maekawa M, Yamaguchi S, Kyozuka J (2009) d14, a strigolactone-insensitive mutant of rice, shows an accelerated outgrowth of tillers. Plant Cell Physiol 50:1416–1424. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcp091
Artuso E, Ghibaudi E, Lace B, Marabello D, Vinciguerra D, Lombardi C, Koltai H, Kapulnik Y, Novero M, Occhiato EG, Scarpi D, Parisotto S, Deagostino A, Venturello P, Mayzlish-Gati E, Bier A, Prandi C (2015) Stereochemical assignment of strigolactone analogues confirms their selective biological activity. J Nat Prod 78:2624–2633. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jnatprod.5b00557
Bécard G, Fortin JA (1988) Early events of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza formation on Ri T-DNA transformed roots. New Phytol 108:211–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1988.tb03698.x
Besserer A, Puech-Pagès V, Kiefer P, Gomez-Roldan V, Jauneau A, Roy S, Portais J-C, Roux C, Bécard G, Séjalon-Delmas N (2006) Strigolactones stimulate arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi by activating mitochondria. PLoS Biol 4:e226. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040226
Boyer FD, de Saint GA, Pillot JP, Pouvreau JB, Chen VX, Ramos S, Stévenin A, Simier P, Delavault P, Beau JM, Rameau C (2012) Structure-activity relationship studies of strigolactone-related molecules for branching inhibition in garden pea: molecule design for shoot branching. Plant Physiol 159:1524–1544. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.195826
Boyer FD, de Saint GA, Pouvreau JB, Clavé G, Pillot JP, Roux A, Rasmussen A, Depuydt S, Lauressergues D, Frei Dit Frey N, Heugebaert TS, Stevens CV, Geelen D, Goormachtig S, Rameau C (2014) New strigolactone analogs as plant hormones with low activities in the rhizosphere. Mol Plant 7:675–690. https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/sst163
Bruno M, Vermathen M, Alder A, Wüst F, Schaub P, van der Steen R, Beyer P, Ghisla S, Al-Babili S (2017) Insights into the formation of carlactone from in-depth analysis of the CCD8-catalyzed reactions. FEBS Lett 591:792–800. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.12593
Buée M, Rossignol M, Jauneau A, Ranjeva R, Bécard G (2000) The pre-symbiotic growth of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi is induced by a branching factor partially purified from plant root exudates. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 13:693–698. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI.2000.13.6.693
Bürger M, Chory J (2020) The many models of strigolactone signaling. Trends Plant Sci 25:395–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2019.12.009
Bythell-Douglas R, Waters MT, Scaffidi A, Flematti GR, Smith SM, Bond CS, Newcomb RD (2013) The structure of the karrikin-insensitive protein (KAI2) in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS ONE 8(1):e54758
Chen M, Arato M, Borghi L, Nouri E, Reinhardt D (2018) Beneficial services of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi – from ecology to application. Front Plant Sci 9:1270. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01270
Cheng Y, Ma W, Li X, Miao W, Zheng L, Cheng B (2012) Polyamines stimulate hyphal branching and infection in the early stage of Glomus etunicatum colonization. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 28:1615–1621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-011-0967-0
Cohen M, Prandi C, Occhiato EG, Tabasso S, Wininger S, Resnick N, Steinberger Y, Koltai H, Kapulnik Y (2013) Structure–function relations of strigolactone analogs: activity as plant hormones and plant interactions. Mol Plant 6:141–152. https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/sss134
Conn CE, Nelson DC (2016) Evidence that KARRIKIN-INSENSITIVE2 (KAI2) receptors may perceive an unknown signal that is not karrikin or strigolactone. Front Plant Sci 6:1219. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.01219
Cook CE, Whichard LP, Turner B, Wall ME (1966) Germination of witchweed (Striga lutea Lour.): isolation and properties of a potent stimulant. Science 154:1189–1190. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.154.3753.1189
de Saint Germain A, Clavé G, Badet-Denisot MA, Pillot JP, Cornu D, Le Caer JP, Burger M, Pelissier F, Retailleau P, Turnbull C, Bonhomme S, Chory J, Rameau C, Boyer FD (2016) An histidine covalent receptor and butenolide complex mediates strigolactone perception. Nat Chem Biol 12:787–794. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.2147
Elias KS, Safir GR (1987) Hyphal elongation of Glomus fasciculatus in response to root exudates. Appl Environ Microbiol 53:1928–1933
Flematti GR, Ghisalberti EL, Dixon KW, Trengove RD (2009) Identification of alkyl substituted 2H-Furo[2,3-c]pyran-2-ones as germination stimulants present in smoke. J Agric Food Chem 57:9475–9480. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf9028128
Flematti GR, Scaffidi A, Waters MT, Smith SM (2016) Stereospecificity in strigolactone biosynthesis and perception. Planta 243:1361–1373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-016-2523-5
Foo E, Ross JJ, Jones WT, Reid JB (2013) Plant hormones in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbioses: an emerging role for gibberellins. Ann Bot 111:769–779. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mct041
Genre A, Chabaud M, Balzergue C, Puech-Pagès V, Novero M, Rey T, Fournier J, Rochange S, Bécard G, Bonfante P, Barker DG (2013) Short-chain chitin oligomers from arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi trigger nuclear Ca2+ spiking in Medicago truncatula roots and their production is enhanced by strigolactone. New Phytol 198:190–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12146
Gomez-Roldan V, Fermas S, Brewer PB, Puech-Pagès V, Dun EA, Pillot JP, Letisse F, Matusova R, Danoun S, Portais JC, Bouwmeester H, Bécard G, Beveridge CA, Rameau C, Rochange SF (2008) Strigolactone inhibition of shoot branching. Nature 455:189–194. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07271
Gutjahr C, Gobbato E, Choi J, Riemann M, Johnston MG, Summers W, Carbonnel S, Mansfield C, Yang S-Y, Nadal M, Acosta I, Takano M, Jiao WB, Schneeberger K, Kelly KA, Paszkowski U (2015) Rice perception of symbiotic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi requires the karrikin receptor complex. Science 350 (6267):1521–1524
Hamiaux C, Drummond RSM, Janssen BJ, Ledger SE, Cooney JM, Newcomb RD, Snowden KC (2012) DAD2 is an α/β hydrolase likely to be involved in the perception of the plant branching hormone, strigolactone. Curr Biol 22:2032–2036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.08.007
Hewitt E (1966) Sand and water culture methods used in the study of plant nutrition, 2nd edn. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau, London
Jia KP, Baz L, Al-Babili S (2018) From carotenoids to strigolactones. J Exp Bot 69:2189–2204. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx476
Johnson A, Gowada G, Hassanali A, Knox J, Monaco S, Razavi Z, Roseberry G (1981) The preparation of synthetic analogues of strigol. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 1:1734–1743. https://doi.org/10.1039/P19810001734
Kobae Y (2019) The infection unit: an overlooked conceptual unit for arbuscular mycorrhizal function. In: Ohyama T (ed) Root biology - growth, physiology, and functions. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.86996
Kobae Y, Kameoka H, Sugimura Y, Saito K, Ohtomo R, Fujiwara T, Kyozuka J (2018) Strigolactone biosynthesis genes of rice are required for the punctual entry of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi into the roots. Plant Cell Physiol 59:544–553. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcy001
Kountche BA, Novero M, Jamil M, Asami T, Bonfante P, Al-Babili S (2018) Effect of the strigolactone analogs methyl phenlactonoates on spore germination and root colonization of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Heliyon 4:e00936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00936
Kretzschmar T, Kohlen W, Sasse J, Borghi L, Schlegel M, Bachelier JB, Reinhardt D, Bours R, Bouwmeester HJ, Martinoia E (2012) A petunia ABC protein controls strigolactone-dependent symbiotic signalling and branching. Nature 483:341–344. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10873
Lauressergues D, André O, Peng J, Wen J, Chen R, Ratet P, Tadege M, Mysore KS, Rochange SF (2015) Strigolactones contribute to shoot elongation and to the formation of leaf margin serrations in Medicago truncatula R108. J Exp Bot 66:1237–1244. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru471
Lopez-Obando M, Ligerot Y, Bonhomme S, Boyer F-D, Rameau C (2015) Strigolactone biosynthesis and signaling in plant development. Development 142:3615–3619. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.120006
López-Ráez JA, Fernández I, García JM, Berrio E, Bonfante P, Walter MH, Pozo MJ (2015) Differential spatio-temporal expression of carotenoid cleavage dioxygenases regulates apocarotenoid fluxes during AM symbiosis. Plant Sci 230:59–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2014.10.010
Matthys C, Walton A, Struk S, Stes E, Boyer F-D, Gevaert K, Goormachtig S (2016) The Whats, the Wheres and the Hows of strigolactone action in the roots. Planta 243:1327–1337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-016-2483-9
Mori N, Nishiuma K, Sugiyama T, Hayashi H, Akiyama K (2016) Carlactone-type strigolactones and their synthetic analogues as inducers of hyphal branching in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Phytochemistry 130:90–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2016.05.012
Mori N, Sado A, Xie X, Yoneyama K, Asami K, Seto Y, Nomura T, Yamaguchi S, Yoneyama K, Akiyama K (2020) Chemical identification of 18-hydroxycarlactonoic acid as an LjMAX1 product and in planta conversion of its methyl ester to canonical and non-canonical strigolactones in Lotus japonicus. Phytochemistry 174:112349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2020.112349
Nagahashi G, Douds DD (1999) Rapid and sensitive bioassay to study signals between root exudates and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Biotechnol Tech 13:893–897. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008938527757
Nagahashi G, Douds DD, Abney GD (1996) Phosphorus amendment inhibits hyphal branching of the VAM fungus Gigaspora margarita directly and indirectly through its effect on root exudation. Mycorrhiza 6:403–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005720050139
Nagata M, Yamamoto N, Miyamoto T, Shimomura A, Arimaa S, Hirsch AM, Suzuki A (2016) Enhanced hyphal growth of arbuscular mycorrhizae by root exudates derived from high R/FR treated Lotus japonicus. Plant Signal Behav 11:e1187356. https://doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2016.1187356
Nakamura H, Xue YL, Miyakawa T, Hou F, Qin HM, Fukui K, Shi X, Ito E, Ito S, Park SH, Miyauchi Y, Asano A, Totsuka N, Ueda T, Tanokura M, Asami T (2013) Molecular mechanism of strigolactone perception by DWARF14. Nat Commun 4:2613. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3613
Scaffidi A, Waters MT, Sun YK, Skelton BW, Dixon KW, Ghisalberti EL, Flematti GR, Smith SM (2014) Strigolactone hormones and their stereoisomers signal through two related receptor proteins to induce different physiological responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 165:1221–1232. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.114.240036
Scervino JM, Ponce MA, Erra-Bassells R, Vierheilig H, Ocampo JA, Godeas A (2005) Flavonoids exhibit fungal species and genus specific effects on the presymbiotic growth of Gigaspora and Glomus. Mycol Res 109:789–794. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0953756205002881
Seto Y, Yamaguchi S (2014) Strigolactone biosynthesis and perception. Curr Opin Plant Biol 21:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2014.06.001
Seto Y, Yasui R, Kameoka H, Tamiru M, Cao M, Terauchi R, Sakurada A, Hirano R, Kisugi T, Hanada A, Umehara M, Seo E, Akiyama K, Burke J, Takeda-Kamiya N, Li W, Hirano Y, Hakoshima T, Mashiguchi K, Noel JP, Kyozuka J, Yamaguchi S (2019) Strigolactone perception and deactivation by a hydrolase receptor DWARF14. Nat Commun 10:191. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-08124-7
Smith S, Read D (2008) Mycorrhizal symbiosis, 3rd edn. Academic Press, London
Stauder R, Welsch R, Camagna M, Kohlen W, Balcke GU, Tissier A, Walter MH (2018) Strigolactone levels in dicot roots are determined by an ancestral symbiosis-regulated clade of the PHYTOENE SYNTHASE gene family. Front Plant Sci 9:255. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00255
Takahashi I, Asami T (2018) Target-based selectivity of strigolactone agonists and antagonists in plants and their potential use in agriculture. J Exp Bot 69:2241–2254. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ery126
Umehara M, Hanada A, Yoshida S, Akiyama K, Arite T, Takeda-Kamiya N, Magome H, Kamiya Y, Shirasu K, Yoneyama K, Kyozuka J, Yamaguchi S (2008) Inhibition of shoot branching by new terpenoid plant hormones. Nature 455:195–200. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07272
Umehara M, Cao M, Akiyama K, Akatsu T, Seto Y, Hanada A, Li W, Takeda-Kamiya N, Morimoto Y, Yamaguchi S (2015) Structural requirements of strigolactones for shoot branching inhibition in rice and Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol 56:1059–1072. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcv028
Vierheilig H, Coughlan A, Wyss U, Piche Y (1998) Ink and vinegar, a simple staining technique for arbuscular-mycorrhizal fungi. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:5004–5007
Villaécija-Aguilar JA, Hamon-Josse M, Carbonnel S, Kretschmar A, Schmidt C, Dawid C, Bennett T, Gutjahr C (2019) SMAX1/SMXL2 regulate root and root hair development downstream of KAI2-mediated signalling in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet 15:e1008327. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008327
Vogel JT, Walter MH, Giavalisco P, Lytovchenko A, Kohlen W, Charnikhova T, Simkin AJ, Goulet C, Strack D, Bouwmeester HJ, Fernie AR, Klee HJ (2009) SlCCD7 controls strigolactone biosynthesis, shoot branching and mycorrhiza-induced apocarotenoid formation in tomato. Plant J 61:300–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.04056.x
Walter MH, Floss DS, Hans J, Fester T, Strack D (2007) Apocarotenoid biosynthesis in arbuscular mycorrhizal roots: contributions from methylerythritol phosphate pathway isogenes and tools for its manipulation. Phytochemistry 68:130–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2006.09.032
Xie X, Mori N, Yoneyama K, Nomura T, Uchida K, Yoneyama K, Akiyama K (2019) Lotuslactone, a non-canonical strigolactone from Lotus japonicus. Phytochemistry 157:200–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2018.10.034
Xu Y, Miyakawa T, Nosaki S, Nakamura A, Lyu Y, Nakamura H, Ohto U, Ishida H, Shimizu T, Asami T, Tanokura M (2018) Structural analysis of HTL and D14 proteins reveals the basis for ligand selectivity in Striga. Nat Commun 9:3947. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06452-2
Yamauchi M, Ueno K, Furumoto T, Wakabayashi T, Mizutani M, Takikawa H, Sugimoto Y (2018) Stereospecific reduction of the butenolide in strigolactones in plants. Bioorg Med Chem 26:4225–4233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2018.07.016
Yao R, Ming Z, Yan L, Li S, Wang F, Ma S, Yu C, Yang M, Chen L, Chen L, Li Y, Yan C, Miao D, Sun Z, Yan J, Sun Y, Wang L, Chu J, Fan S, He W, Deng H, Nan F, Li J, Rao Z, Lou Z, Xie D (2016) DWARF14 is a non-canonical hormone receptor for strigolactone. Nature 536:469–473. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19073
Yao R, Wang F, Ming Z, Du X, Chen L, Wang Y, Zhang W, Deng H, Xie D (2017) ShHTL7 is a non-canonical receptor for strigolactones in root parasitic weeds. Cell Res 27:838–841. https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2017.3
Yao J, Mashiguchi K, Scaffidi A, Akatsu T, Melville KT, Morita R, Morimoto Y, Smith SM, Seto Y, Flematti GR, Yamaguchi S, Waters MT (2018) An allelic series at the KARRIKIN INSENSITIVE 2 locus of Arabidopsis thaliana decouples ligand hydrolysis and receptor degradation from downstream signalling. Plant J 96:75–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14017
Yoneyama K, Xie X, Yoneyama K, Kisugi T, Nomura T, Nakatani Y, Akiyama K, McErlean CSP (2018) Which are the major players, canonical or non-canonical strigolactones? J Exp Bot 69:2231–2239. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ery090
Yoshida S, Kameoka H, Tempo M, Akiyama K, Umehara M, Yamaguchi S, Hayashi H, Kyozuka J, Shirasu K (2012) The D3 F-box protein is a key component in host strigolactone responses essential for arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. New Phytol 196:1208–1216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04339.x
Zhao LH, Zhou XE, Wu ZS, Yi W, Xu Y, Li S, Xu TH, Liu Y, Chen RZ, Kovach A, Kang Y, Hou L, He Y, Xie C, Song W, Zhong D, Xu Y, Wang Y, Li J, Zhang C, Melcher K, Xu HE (2013) Crystal structures of two phytohormone signal-transducing α/β hydrolases: karrikin-signaling KAI2 and strigolactone-signaling DWARF14. Cell Res 23:436–439. https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2013.19
Zwanenburg B, Pospísil T (2013) Structure and activity of strigolactones: new plant hormones with a rich future. Mol Plant 6:38–62. https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/sss141
Acknowledgements
We thank Mégane Gaston and Nicolas Cadilhac for technical assistance with some experiments.
Code availability
Not applicable
Funding
This study was partly funded by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-18-CE20-0001-01). It was also supported by the TULIP LabEx (ANR-10-LABX-41) and the Stream COST Action FA1206. The Institut de Chimie des Substances Naturelles benefits from the support of the Labex CHARM3AT program (ANR-11-LABX-39).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SR, QT, DL and FDB contributed to the study conception and design. Experiments and data analysis were performed by QT, DL, KM, MC and SR. Chemicals were synthesized by VS and FDB. The manuscript was written by SR, QT and FDB.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethics approval
Not applicable
Consent to participate
Not applicable
Consent for publication
Not applicable
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Taulera, Q., Lauressergues, D., Martin, K. et al. Initiation of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis involves a novel pathway independent from hyphal branching. Mycorrhiza 30, 491–501 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-020-00965-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-020-00965-9