Introduction

Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi (AMF) are important plant symbionts which are considered fundamental biofertilizers and bioenhancers, increasing plant nutrition and tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses (Smith and Read 2008; Rouphael et al. 2015). Moreover, they enhance plant biosynthesis of secondary metabolites with health-promoting activities (Sbrana et al. 2014) and affect gene expression of the relevant key enzymes (Battini et al. 2016). AMF absorb and translocate mineral nutrients from the soil to the host plants by means of an extensive extraradical mycelium (ERM) which develops around colonized roots in the surrounding soil (Smith and Read 2008). Such belowground mycelium consists of a complex and indefinitely large network of nonseptate, multinucleated hyphae that may be interconnected by hyphal fusions (anastomoses), and which can link the roots of different plants in a community (Giovannetti et al. 2004).

Anastomosis, a common cellular process in filamentous fungi, has been largely studied in Basidiomycetes and Ascomycetes, given its essential role in sexual fusion and in the establishment and maintenance of interconnectedness, homeostasis, and intrahyphal communication in the fungal colony (Gregory 1984; Rayner 1991, 1996; Glass et al. 2000, 2004; Hutchison and Glass 2012). The occurrence and frequency of anastomoses in AMF, as well as the cytological events involved, have been widely investigated since 1999 (Giovannetti et al. 1999), and their importance for nuclear intermingling, genetic exchange, and interplant nutrient flow has been demonstrated by different authors (see Giovannetti et al. 2015). AMF mycelia carry thousands of nuclei at all times (Cooke et al. 1987; Bécard and Pfeffer 1993; Pawlowska and Taylor 2004), and their genetic organization has been debated for years (Kuhn et al. 2001; Pawlowska and Taylor 2004; Hijri and Sanders 2005; Croll et al. 2008; Tisserant et al. 2013; Lin et al. 2014; Boon et al. 2015). Recent data, however, have shown that AMF mycelium contains nuclei that are either highly similar or of two dominant genotypes, depending on the isolate (Riley and Corradi 2013; Ropars et al. 2016).

In AMF, successful anastomoses, characterized by complete fusion of hyphal walls, protoplasm continuity, and occurrence of nuclei in the middle of hyphal bridges, have been detected between (i) hyphae of the same germling and of different germlings of the same/different isolates (Giovannetti et al. 1999; Croll et al. 2009; Cárdenas-Flores et al. 2010, 2011; Purin and Morton 2011, 2013; de la Providencia et al. 2013; de Novais et al. 2013), (ii) asymbiotic and symbiotic mycelium of the same isolate (Sbrana et al. 2011), and (iii) extraradical hyphae of the same isolate developing from colonized roots of plants belonging to different species, genera, and families (Giovannetti et al. 2004). Such a process contributes greatly to hyphal interconnectedness and integration in these obligate biotrophs, as the percentage of perfect anastomoses may exceed 90% in some isolates belonging to the genus Glomus sensu lato (de Novais et al. 2013), and the bidirectional flow of cellular particles and organelles in fusion bridges may proceed at a maximum speed of 1.8 μm s−1 (Giovannetti et al. 2015).

By contrast, hyphal contacts which do not lead to anastomoses may result in either no interactions or incompatible hyphal interactions. Pre-fusion incompatible responses, consisting of protoplasm retraction and septa formation before anastomosis, have been reported to occur between germlings of geographically different isolates of the same AMF species, highlighting the existence of early self/nonself discriminating signals (Giovannetti et al. 2003; Croll et al. 2009; de la Providencia et al. 2013; Purin and Morton 2013). On the other hand, incompatibility reactions occurring at post-fusion stages, consisting of protoplasm withdrawal and septa formation in fused hyphae, occurred in hyphal interactions between asymbiotic and symbiotic mycelia and between genetically different germlings belonging to the same species, showing that such events are finely regulated by specific recognition mechanisms (Croll et al. 2009; Sbrana et al. 2011; de la Providencia et al. 2013).

The consequences of vegetative incompatibility have not been adequately investigated, despite the important role they may play in population divergence of AMF isolates in natural and agricultural ecosystems and in AMF isolates maintained in culture collections worldwide or utilized as inoculants in agriculture. Indeed, within-population patterns of genetic differentiation have been detected in native AMF isolates of Funneliformis mosseae and Funneliformis caledonium from agricultural soils in Denmark and of Glomus intraradices (now identified as Rhizophagus irregularis or Rhizoglomus irregulare) in Switzerland (Stukenbrock and Rosendahl 2005; Koch et al. 2006; Croll et al. 2008; Rosendahl 2008). Other authors found evidence that segregation may occur in one population of R. irregulare, leading to segregated lines with different phenotypic traits (Angelard et al. 2010; Angelard and Sanders 2011). Unfortunately, the quoted studies did not investigate whether the differentiated/segregated lineages were still capable of self-recognition, leading to the production of perfect anastomoses.

To the best of our knowledge, only one work reported the maintenance of hyphal recognition ability among different lineages of a single AMF isolate, in an in vitro experiment carried out on descendant clonal root organ cultures (ROCs) of the same R. irregulare ancestor, maintained under different laboratory conditions for about a decade (Cárdenas-Flores et al. 2010).

In this study, we tested five lineages of F. mosseae originating from the Rothamsted isolate previously denominated Yellow Vacuolate (Mosse and Bowen 1968), later ascribed to the species Glomus mosseae (now F. mosseae), that had been separately grown for more than 20 years in five European laboratories, where different selective pressures were operating (number and identity of host plant species, chemical and physical characteristics of the soil, temperature and light conditions in the greenhouses). The aims of the study were (i) to evaluate, by culture assays, phenotypic differences, such as germination and growth ability, of the five different lineages; (ii) to detect the occurrence of vegetative incompatibility in hyphae belonging to the same and to the five different lineages, by systematic detection of anastomosis occurrence and frequency and by cytological studies; and (iii) to assess the genetic distances of the five different lineages, by DNA fingerprinting methods.

Materials and methods

Fungal material

Five different culture lines of the AM fungal species F. mosseae (T.H. Nicolson & Gerd.) C. Walker & A. Schüßler, established from the Rothamsted isolate originally described as Yellow Vacuolate (Mosse and Bowen 1968, hereafter F. mosseae YV), were used. The lineages were grown in different European laboratories for at least 20 years (Table 1). Spores were extracted from pot culture soil by wet sieving and decanting, flushed into petri dishes, and collected with a capillary pipette under a dissecting microscope (Wild, Leica, Milan, Italy). Intact, healthy spores were sonicated (60 s) in a B-1210 cleaner (Branson Ultrasonics, Soest, The Netherlands), washed three times in sterile distilled water (SDW), and incubated for germination on a cellulose ester membrane (Millipore HAWP04700, 0.45-μm-diameter pores) placed on moist sterile quartz grit. To confirm that all lineages were originating from F. mosseae isolate YV, the occurrence of the distinctive 214-bp fragment produced by restriction of the ITS region with the enzyme TaqI was assessed on a batch of 10 spores for each lineage by DNA extraction (Online resource 1), ITS amplification with the primers ITS1 and ITS4, and analysis of the restriction products (Giovannetti et al. 2003). With the aim of removing a possible “maternal effect” induced by different culture conditions, such as soil composition and host plant, germinated spores from each lineage were used to inoculate Allium porrum L. seedlings (leek) and to establish pot cultures using a 1:1 mixture of sterile calcinated clay (Terragreen) and sandy soil. Pots were maintained in sun-transparent bags (Sigma Aldrich s.r.l., Milan, Italy) in a greenhouse for 4 months. Then, the newly produced spores were collected and used for the subsequent tests.

Table 1 Culture lineages used in this work, descending from the same ancestor isolate of Funneliformis mosseae (Yellow Vacuolated) obtained by all donors from Rothamsted Research Station (UK)

Phenotypic traits of the five lineages

The different F. mosseae lineages were tested for their germination and growth ability. Sporocarps were extracted from pot culture soil by wet sieving and decanting, collected with forceps under the dissecting microscope, rinsed five times in SDW, and transferred to Millipore membranes placed on moist sterile quartz grit in 9-cm-diameter petri dishes. After 14 days of incubation in the dark at 25 °C, mycelium growing on the membranes was stained with trypan blue (0.05% in lactic acid) and observed under the dissecting microscope. Germination percentage and hyphal length of each germling were evaluated by the grid line intersect method (Giovannetti and Mosse 1980) on at least 50 germinated sporocarps for each lineage.

Vegetative compatibility assays and cytological studies of hyphal compatibility/incompatibility

To minimize the effects due to differential germination and hyphal growth among the five lineages, newly germinated sporocarps, belonging either to the same or to different lineages and showing comparable hyphal lengths, were selected for compatibility test pairings. Paired sporocarps were placed on a 47-mm Millipore membrane, approximately 1 cm apart, and at least 30 replicate membranes were prepared for each pairing. The five self pairings and all possible (10) pairing combinations among different lineages were tested. Membranes were placed on moistened membranes of the same type laid on sterile quartz grit in 14-cm-diameter petri dishes, which were sealed with Parafilm and incubated at 25 °C in the dark. After 20 days of incubation, occurrence of anastomoses was assessed on germlings by staining for the localization of succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) activity (Smith and Gianinazzi-Pearson 1990). Deposition of formazan salts in hyphae allowed the visualization of viable mycelia and of protoplasmic continuity between fusing hyphae. Membranes bearing two germinated sporocarps whose hyphae came into contact were mounted on microscope slides with 0.05% trypan blue in lactic acid and observed under a Reichert-Jung (Vienna, Austria) Polyvar microscope. To verify the maintenance of viability of perfect fusions, some membrane pairings were incubated for longer periods, up to 70 days, before staining as previously described. All hyphal contacts were scored at magnifications of ×125 to ×500, and the frequency of perfect anastomoses was calculated by determining the proportion of hyphal contacts that led to hyphal fusions. Each hyphal contact was verified at a magnification of ×1250 and assigned to a hyphal interaction class, i.e., noninteracting hyphae, pre-fusion incompatibility, post-fusion incompatibility, and perfect fusion (Sbrana et al. 2011). Briefly, contacts were scored as noninteracting when hyphae crossed with no cytological reactions, while they were scored as incompatible when one or both hyphae underwent protoplasm vacuolization and septa formation, separating live from dead hyphal compartments. When incompatible reactions occurred before fusion, in hyphae showing tip swelling and/or homing (pre-anastomosis attraction between hyphae), indicative of hyphal recognition, contacts were assigned to pre-fusion incompatibility, while contacts showing protoplasm withdrawal isolating hyphal compartments after anastomosis were assigned to post-fusion incompatibility.

To visualize nuclear mingling in perfect fusions or hyphal incompatible responses, germlings paired on membranes were stained: (i) for hyphal viability and protoplasmic continuity, by the localization of SDH activity or with CellTracker (Molecular Probes, USA); (ii) for the visualization of nuclei, using diamidinophenylindole (DAPI), 5 μg/ml in a 1:1 (vol/vol) water-glycerol solution, or Syto-13, 1 μM in distilled water; and (iii) for the localization of hyphal cross-septa and wall thickening, in a 0.01% (wt/vol) solution of Calcofluor White (Sigma Aldrich, Milan, Italy). All stains were observed in visible light or under epifluorescence with the Polyvar microscope using the filter combination U1 (BP 330–380, LP 418, DS 420) or B1 (BP 330–380, LP 418, DS 420).

DNA extraction and PCR optimization

Since optimal random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and intersimple sequence repeat (ISSR) amplification depend on several factors, including DNA template, reagent concentrations, and temperature profile, several PCR mixes and thermocycler parameters (DNA template, MgCl2, primers and dNTPs concentrations, annealing temperature, and cycle number) were optimized before molecular analyses (Online resource 1). For molecular analyses of the different lineages, 100 intact, healthy spores per lineage were selected, surface sterilized, and subjected to DNA extraction (Online resource 1).

RAPD and ISSR-PCR assays

RAPD-PCR amplification of DNA from the five F. mosseae lines was performed using random 10-mer primers (OP-A, MWG Biotech AG, Germany, Online resource 1). The reaction was carried out in an optimized mix with a final volume of 25 μl, containing 1× reaction buffer, 2 mM MgCl2, 200 μM dNTPs, 100 ng primer, 5 ng DNA, and 0.125 U Taq DNA polymerase (TaKaRa Taq™ Bio Inc.). Reactions were performed in a thermocycler Mastercycler personal 5332 (Eppendorf). The optimized thermocycling program consisted of 1 min at 94 °C, 40 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 34 or 35 °C (depending on the oligomer) for 1 min, extension at 72 °C for 1 min, and a final extension step of 10 min at 72 °C. Amplification products were electrophoresed in 1.5% NuSieve 3:1 agarose gel in 1× TBE buffer with 0.05% ethidium bromide.

The same DNA extracts were used as templates for RAPD-PCR reactions carried out with oligonucleotide primers 19–26 bp in length (Online resource 1) (Sebastiani et al. 2001). The amplification reactions were performed in a total volume of 10 μl. Each reaction consisted of 5 ng of template DNA, 1× reaction buffer, 2 mM MgCl2, 200 μM dNTPs, 250 ng of primer, 0.2 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Roche Diagnostics), and 0.001% of gelatin (Roche). Reactions were carried out in the thermal cycler Mastercycler personal 5332 (Eppendorf) with the following thermal program: denaturation at 94 °C for 90 s, 45 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 45 °C for 1 min and extension at 75 °C for 2 min, followed by two final extension steps, at 75 °C for 10 min and at 60 °C for 10 min. All the amplification volume was loaded onto a 2.5% agarose gel (1% NuSieve 3:1 plus 1.5% Agarose-1000, Invitrogen, UK) with 1× TBE containing 0.05% ethidium bromide.

Random microsatellite and flanking regions were amplified with ISSR primers (Online resource 1). The amplification reactions were performed in a 25-μl mixture volume containing 1× reaction buffer, 2 mM MgCl2, 200 μM dNTPs, 200 ng of primer, 5 ng DNA, and 0.125 U of Taq DNA polymerase (TaKaRa Taq™ Bio Inc.). The thermocycler Mastercycler personal 5332 was programmed as follows: 10 s at 95 °C; 5 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 1 min at 50 °C, and 1 min at 72 °C; 35 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 1 min at 48 °C, and 1 min at 72 °C; and a final extension of 10 min at 72 °C. Amplification products were loaded onto a 1.5% NuSieve 3:1 agarose gel in 1× TBE buffer with 0.05% ethidium bromide.

For each primer used and each lineage, three replicate amplifications and electrophoreses were carried out and analyzed.

Statistical analyses

Frequency data of perfect fusions, post-fusion, and pre-fusion interactions obtained for each replicate pairing were arcsine transformed, checked for fulfillment of ANOVA assumptions (by Shapiro-Wilk and Levene’s tests), and then submitted to two-way and/or one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD multiple range test (homogeneous variances) or Welch’s test (nonhomogeneous variances) to assess (i) significant differences between self and nonself hyphal interactions, independently of the lineage’s combination; (ii) differences among lineages in perfect fusions, comparing the different self pairings; (iii) differences among lineages in perfect fusions, comparing the different nonself pairings; (iv) differences among lineages in perfect fusions, comparing self and nonself pairing combinations involving each lineage; and (v) differences among lineages in incompatible post-fusion and pre-fusion interactions, comparing nonself pairings involving each lineage. For perfect fusions data, the following relative perfect fusions ratio was also calculated for each replicate pairing: F ij /((F ii  + F jj )/2), where F ij is the interlineage frequency, while F ii and F jj are average self-anastomosis frequencies of parents’ lineages. Such ratios and arcsine-transformed average frequencies obtained from compatibility tests were used to compute Manhattan distance values, which are particularly useful for the study of closely related populations (Nei 1987), and a Bray-Curtis similarity matrix.

At the end of the PCR optimization procedure, the presence (1) or absence (0) of specific DNA amplification products, considering intense and reproducible bands, was scored for each replicate and primer selected, and Jaccard similarity indices among replicate profiles were calculated. Data obtained from optimized RAPD and ISSR profiles for each lineage replicate and primer selected were assembled to be used to compute the pairwise genetic distances among the lineages. Manhattan and Bray-Curtis indices were used to compute genetic distance/similarity and to assay by Mantel tests the relationship between the molecular data matrix and matrices based on hyphal compatibility data. Analyses were performed using IBM SPSS software version 23, and diversity and similarity indices and Mantel tests (9999 permutations) were computed using PAST version 3.

Results

Phenotypic traits of the five lineages

Sporocarps of the five F. mosseae culture lines showed distinct germination percentages and mycelial lengths (Table 2). The lineage BA exhibited the lowest mean germination percentage, which was significantly different (P < 0.01) from those recorded for the other culture lines. No significant differences were detected among lineages PI, TO, DJ, and GR, for which germination rates ranged between 35 and 50%. One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD carried out on hyphal length data showed that values detected for lines TO and BA were significantly lower than those observed for the lineages PI and GR (F4, 20 = 14.11, P < 0.001). Only germinated sporocarps showing a similar number of germinating spores (average 6 ± 2 per sporocarp) and comparable hyphal lengths were selected for compatibility assays.

Table 2 Germination percentages and mycelial length from sporocarps produced by five different Funneliformis mosseae lineages originating from the same ancestor isolate

Vegetative compatibility assays

Self pairings

After 20 days of incubation, hyphae originating from germlings of the same F. mosseae lineage showed perfect hyphal fusions, characterized by the establishment of protoplasm continuity, which was visualized by formazan salt depositions in hyphal bridges (SDH activity) and by shared nuclear material (visualized by DAPI fluorescence microscopy). High percentages of fusions were detected in all F. mosseae self pairings (Online resource 2), and one-way ANOVA showed significant differences (Welch test = 3.61, P = 0.015) between self-anastomosis rates of lineage PI (60.4 ± 2.6), compared with DJ (79.6 ± 3.8) (Tukey’s HSD, P = 0.014), whereas rates of lineages TO, GR, and BA (64.3 ± 4.7, 66.6 ± 3.1, and 69.0 ± 4.7, respectively) did not differ from the others. In self pairings, all hyphal contacts which did not lead to anastomoses showed no interactions, and the rate of noninteracting contacts ranged from 20.3 ± 3.8% (lineage DJ) to 39.6 ± 2.6% (lineage PI).

Long-term maintenance (40–70 days of incubation) of perfect fusions viability was confirmed by assessing anastomosis frequencies on SDH-stained self pairings, which were not significantly different from those detected at 20 days of harvests.

Nonself pairings

Perfect fusions also were detected among all the different F. mosseae lineages: such fusions showed nuclear mingling through hyphal bridges by DAPI fluorescence microscopy (Fig. 1a–c), and their viability and protoplasm continuity were maintained in long-term incubated pairings. Percentages of perfect hyphal fusions ranged from 17 ± 4.2%, in TO-GR pairings, to 44 ± 7.2%, in PI-DJ pairings (Fig. 2). One-way ANOVA showed that, independently of lineages’ combination, a significantly lower number of perfect hyphal fusions was obtained from nonself pairings compared with self pairings (Welch’s test1, 247 = 125.10, P < 0.001), while it failed to detect significant differences among the different nonself pairings. Similarly, one-way ANOVA carried out with relative perfect fusion ratios did not show significant differences among all the nonself combinations (F9, 148 = 1.44, P = 0.175).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Micrographs showing hyphal interactions occurring in both self and nonself pairings among germlings belonging to different Funneliformis mosseae lineages, after succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) localization and trypan blue staining (a, b, df) or after 2,4-diamidinophenylindole (DAPI) staining (c). a Perfect fusion occurring between germlings of the PI lineage (scale bar = 10 μm). b, c Perfect fusions occurring between hyphae originating from spores of BA and GR lineages: of note, the protoplasm continuity between fused hyphae demonstrated by SDH and nuclear mingling (arrow) (b, scale bar = 10 μm; c, scale bar = 8 μm). d Cross-walls (septa) indicating incompatibility, occurring after fusion between hyphae belonging to lineages TO and GR (scale bar = 12 μm). e, f Incompatibility response, with protoplasm withdrawal and septa formation (arrows), occurring before hyphal fusion in pairings PI-DJ (e, scale bar = 10 μm) and TO-BA (f, scale bar = 12 μm)

Fig. 2
figure 2

Mean frequencies of contacts showing perfect anastomoses, pre-fusion, or post-fusion incompatible hyphal interactions detected in pairings among germlings belonging to different Funneliformis mosseae lineages originating from the same ancestor isolate. Bars with the same letter do not differ significantly (Tukey’s HSD, P = 0.04)

One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD also was used to detect significant differences among self/nonself pairings for each lineage: all nonself pairings involving the DJ lineage showed a significantly lower number of perfect hyphal fusions, compared with DJ self pairings (F4, 86 = 4.56, P = 0.002), while nonself pairings involving the other F. mosseae lineages differed from those of the relevant self pairings only in some combinations (Online resource 2). TO-GR and TO-BA fusion frequencies were significantly lower than those found in TO self pairings (F4, 84 = 10.58, P < 0.01), PI-GR perfect fusion values were significantly lower than PI self-anastomosis rates (Welch’s test4, 31 = 14.29, P < 0.001), GR-TO and GR-PI fusion rates were significantly lower than those of GR-GR (Welch’s test4, 44 = 22.33, P < 0.001), and BA-TO and BA-DJ anastomosis frequencies were lower than those of BA-BA (Welch’s test4, 15 = 13.12, P < 0.001).

Post-fusion incompatibility responses were detected in hyphal interactions between germlings of the different F. mosseae lineages and were characterized by protoplasm retraction and multiple septa formation leading to cellular death, hindering protoplasmic continuity between hyphae of the different lineages (Fig. 1d). Frequencies of post-fusion incompatible contacts ranged from 6.0 ± 1.6 to 47.8 ± 6.7% in DJ-BA and in TO-GR pairings, respectively (Fig. 2). One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD, used to detect significant differences among frequencies obtained from all nonself combinations, showed that incompatible fusion rates of TO-DJ pairings were significantly lower than those of TO-GR (F3, 64 = 6.176, P = 0.001) (Fig. 2). Interestingly, when analyzing groups of pairings involving each lineage, incompatibility values found in DJ-BA and DJ-TO were significantly lower than those of DJ-PI pairings (Welch’s test3, 38 = 11.59, P < 0.001) and among pairings involving TO, and post-fusion incompatibility rates found in TO-DJ were significantly lower than those of TO-GR (F3, 64 = 6.18, P = 0.001) (Online resource 2).

Pre-fusion incompatibility responses were detected in nonself hyphal interactions between germlings of all F. mosseae lineages tested. The main feature of such a cellular event was represented by the formation of hyphal swellings by the contacting hypha on the surface of the contacted one, followed by wall thickenings, protoplasm retraction, and septa formation, hindering anastomosis formation (Fig. 1e). When pre-fusion incompatibility occurred in tip-to-side contacts, a recognition response often was observed, consisting of the differentiation of lateral tips by the side of a contacted (recipient) hypha, in correspondence to the approaching tip of the contacting one (Fig. 1f). Pre-fusion incompatible interactions showed frequencies ranging from 1.6 ± 1.0 to 17.3 ± 5.0% in TO-BA and DJ-GR pairings, respectively, and one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD, used to detect significant differences among data obtained from all nonself pairings, showed significant differences among them (Fig. 2). In addition, frequencies of pre-fusion incompatible contacts detected in TO-BA and DJ-BA pairings were significantly higher than those of the other pairings involving TO (F3, 64 = 4.56, P = 0.006) and DJ (Welch’s test5, 41 = 5.99, P = 0.001) lineages, respectively (Online resource 2). On the contrary, no significant differences were found among pairings involving the other F. mosseae lineages (Online resource 2).

During nonself interactions, hyphae appeared to intersect without any reaction in 17.9 ± 5 (PI-DJ) to 47.9 ± 5.5% of contacts (BA-DJ). No significant differences in the rates of noninteracting contacts were detected among nonself pairings involving TO, DJ, GR, and BA, compared with their relevant self pairings, while the pairing PI-DJ showed a significantly lower no-interaction rate than PI-PI (F4, 79 = 3.32, P = 0.014).

Fingerprinting analyses

The YV-distinctive 214-bp fragment produced by restriction of the ITS region with the enzyme TaqI was detected in all the lineages analyzed. Optimization procedures allowed the selection of PCR conditions ensuring the most reproducible electrophoretic profiles, as assessed by correlation analyses. Correlation coefficients among replicate profiles were very high (Online resource 1), ranging from 0.988 to 1 for the entire set of data. The optimized profiles generated by three PCR replications for each lineage and oligonucleotide selected (8 RAPD 10-mer, 6 RAPD 20-mer, 7 ISSR) were combined and analyzed. The analysis of 196 amplified fragments, with an average of 8.2 ± 0.3 (mean ± standard error of the mean) bands per primer, showed a high proportion of uniformly shared bands among F. mosseae lineages, with low numbers of polymorphic fragments. RAPD carried out with 10-mer oligonucleotides showed the occurrence of 3.3 ± 0.7% (TO, GR) to 14 ± 0% (PI) polymorphic fragments, whereas RAPD with 19–26-mer oligonucleotides produced 4.8 ± 0.1% (BA) to 11.6 ± 0% (DJ and GR) polymorphic fragments (Fig. 3). More homogeneous profiles were obtained by ISSR-PCR, with a maximum of 6 ± 0% polymorphic bands, observed in the DJ lineage (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Percentages of polymorphic fragments detected in the different Funneliformis mosseae lineages by using 10-mer or 20-mer RAPD and ISSR primers

Diversity among F. mosseae lineages

The Bray-Curtis indices matrix calculated on the basis of perfect fusion rates obtained from compatibility tests carried out on the different F. mosseae lineages showed similarities ranging from 0.57 (PI-TO) to 0.84 (BA-TO), with an average value of 0.80, while the matrix calculated on the basis of the relative perfect fusion ratio showed the maximum similarity in the pairing PI-DJ and the minimum for the pairing BA-DJ (Fig. 4a). Rates of unsuccessful fusions, i.e., followed by hyphal death, produced a similarity matrix with values ranging from 0, for all pairings involving the lineage BA, to 0.72 (TO-PI) (Fig. 4b). The distance matrix computed using pre-fusion incompatibility rates showed similar values to the post-fusion one, with the exception of the pairing TO-DJ, showing similarity indices of 0.83 and 0.61, respectively (Fig. 4c). A Mantel test carried out to assess correlation among the diversity matrices obtained from data of relative perfect fusion ratio, pre-fusion incompatibility, and post-fusion incompatibility showed an R value of 0.90 (P = 0.008), indicating highly significant correlation.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Bray-Curtis similarity matrices computed on the basis of either phenotypic or genotypic traits of the different Funneliformis mosseae lineages. a Matrix based on the relative ratio between the perfect fusion frequency occurring in nonself pairings and the mean self-pairing frequencies of the relevant parent lineages. b Matrix based on the frequency of contacts showing post-fusion incompatibility. c Matrix based on the frequency of contacts showing pre-fusion incompatibility. d Matrix based on cumulative results of RAPD and ISSR analyses

The Bray-Curtis similarity matrix calculated on the basis of F. mosseae lineage fingerprinting profiles showed values ranging from 0.92 to 0.98, with maximum similarity between PI and DJ and maximum divergence between TO and GR (Fig. 4d).

No correlation was detected between diversity (Manhattan) or similarity (Bray-Curtis) matrices calculated from compatibility assay results and fingerprinting analyses, because Mantel tests were never significant (P ranging from 0.69 to 0.92).

Discussion

The data obtained in this work revealed divergence in F. mosseae lineages which originated from the same isolate and were propagated for 20 years in different locations, in vivo. The pairings between different lineages showed high percentages of incompatible hyphal fusions and a reduction in the ability to form perfect fusions (compatible anastomoses). Moreover, we detected pre-fusion incompatible interactions, absent in self pairings, which, by reducing nuclear intermingling and protoplasm flow between lineages, may represent, together with post-fusion incompatibility, the outcome of the phenotypic and molecular divergence among the different F. mosseae lineages.

Here, we assessed hyphal compatibility of F. mosseae cultures descending from the same Rothamsted isolate, originally named “Yellow Vacuolated” by Barbara Mosse, which were cultured in vivo for more than 20 years in different European laboratories. In AMF, the ability of hyphae belonging to the same isolate to fuse, producing interconnected networks both in asymbiotic and in symbiotic stages, has been confirmed in different experimental systems (Giovannetti et al. 1999, 2003, 2004; Croll et al. 2009; Cárdenas-Flores et al. 2010, 2011; de Novais et al. 2013, 2017; Purin and Morton 2011, 2013; de la Providencia et al. 2013; Pepe et al. 2017). Self-anastomosis frequencies of F. mosseae lineages analyzed here occurred in 60–80% of contacts, consistent with fusion rates previously obtained for other F. mosseae isolates, ranging from 40 to 85% of hyphal contacts (Giovannetti et al. 1999, 2003). Among isolates of other Glomeraceae species, a wider variability in self-fusion frequencies was observed, as low perfect anastomosis rates were reported for isolates of Rhizoglomus clarus and Funneliformis coronatus (6.3 and 4.1% of contacts, respectively), whereas high interconnectedness was detected in R. irregulare MUCL41833 and Glomus formosanum germlings (89 and 91.4% of contacts, respectively) (Cárdenas-Flores et al. 2010; de Novais et al. 2013; Purin and Morton 2013; Pepe et al. 2016).

In this work, germlings of the different lineages showed anastomosis frequencies significantly lower than those belonging to the same lineage, an event possibly representing the first detectable sign of lineages’ segregation and genetic drift. Such findings are consistent with those reported in a previous study, where germlings of R. irregulare originating from different clonal lineages of a single strain, maintained in vitro through subcultivation in different locations, showed the ability to form hyphal anastomoses, although their fusion frequencies were significantly higher within clonal lineages than between lineages (Cárdenas-Flores et al. 2010). Genetic drift occurred in one population of R. irregulare, leading to segregated lines with different phenotypic traits (Angelard et al. 2010; Angelard and Sanders 2011) and in Claroideoglomus etunicatum, where individual spores contained a subset of the total allelic variation from the parent isolate (Boon et al. 2013), although no data are available on the ability of such germlings to anastomose. Germlings of R. irregulare isolates originating from the same agricultural field were able to establish perfect fusions when paired in vitro, although their anastomosis frequencies did not exceed 10% of contacts (Croll et al. 2009). On the contrary, no anastomoses were detected in pairings of F. mosseae or R. irregulare isolates originating from different geographic locations (Cárdenas-Flores et al. 2010; Giovannetti et al. 2003). The divergence that we detected here in the five lineages originated over a 20-year period, although rapid, is consistent with that observed in other AMF and fungal taxa, among in vitro subcultures. Indeed, genetic and phenotypic changes and variations in fungal characters, such as pathogenicity, growth rate, and symbiotic ability, were reported in pathogenic, arbuscular, and ectomycorrhizal fungi over similar or even shorter time intervals (Marx 1981; Richter et al. 2010; Angelard et al. 2014).

When the different F. mosseae lineages were paired, a particular cellular event occurred: after hyphal fusion and protoplasmic mingling, a high number of anastomoses produced many consecutive cross-walls leading to cellular death of fused hyphae. Such an event was previously detected in other fungal taxa when pairing isolates belonging to the same anastomosis group and was named vegetative (or heterokaryon) incompatibility (VI) (Hutchison and Glass 2012; Silar 2012). In Glomeraceae, post-fusion incompatibility was first detected and described in nonself pairings of R. irregulare in an in vitro experimental system, where the anastomoses, though viable only for a short time period, allowed cytoplasmic flow and genetic exchange between genetically different lineages (Croll et al. 2009). In other works, post-fusion incompatibility was not detected either in nonself spore pairings of R. clarus and R. irregulare isolates or in R. irregulare lineages originated from a single mother culture (Cárdenas-Flores et al. 2010; de la Providencia et al. 2013; Purin and Morton 2013). In model fungal species, the mechanisms involved in self/nonself discrimination and in the process of cell death induced by heterokaryon incompatibility have been widely investigated, but so far, the molecular evolution of the relevant genes and alleles and the specific roles of their products have not been disclosed completely in nonmodel species (Glass and Dementhon 2006; Paoletti et al. 2007; Aanen et al. 2010; Paoletti 2016). In AMF genomes, no het or vic loci, which are the main components of fungal VI systems (Paoletti 2016), were detected. In R. irregulare, mat-like loci (Corradi and Brachmann 2017), which are rarely involved in fungal VI, and putative pheromone-sensing genes (Halary et al. 2013) have been reported, though it is still not known whether they may have a role in the occurrence of fusions or VI. In the future, genome-wide association studies may disclose genetic traits involved in regulating AMF hyphal compatibility/incompatibility, while transcript analyses may reveal the biochemical changes associated with cellular processes occurring during anastomosis formation and the establishment of protoplasmic flow or VI, in both asymbiotic and symbiotic interacting hyphae.

Pre-fusion incompatibility, that is protoplasm retraction and septa production before anastomosis formation, represented a further cellular event hindering protoplasm intermingling among the different lineages, thus increasing the chance of their possible divergence. The contacts leading to pre-fusion incompatibility ranged from 1 to 17% among all the lineages tested, a frequency much lower than that previously detected between germlings belonging to geographically different F. mosseae isolates of 32–51% (Giovannetti et al. 2003), indicating an overall lower diversity of our lineages, all originating from the same mother culture. Interestingly, recognition responses previously described in geographically different F. mosseae isolates (Giovannetti et al. 2003), represented by the differentiation of lateral tips in the contacted hyphae in correspondence of the approaching ones, were often detected here during contacts between different lineages’ hyphae.

The frequencies of noninteracting hyphal contacts were not statistically different among self and nonself interactions in the majority of lineages, although a significantly lower rate was found in PI-DJ pairings compared with PI-PI ones. In nonself pairings, the frequencies of hyphal encounters showing no interaction (29–49%, depending on lineage combinations) were consistent with those reported for in vitro assays on different lineages of a single R. irregulare isolate, which reached a maximum of 59% (Cárdenas-Flores et al. 2010) but lower than those previously described in assays among geographically different isolates of F. mosseae (49–68%, Giovannetti et al. 2003) and isolates of R. irregulare originating from the same field (65–86%, Croll et al. 2009), showing that, even though they were maintained in different cultural conditions for a long time, our lineages, sharing a common origin, were still able to retain high hyphal recognition ability.

The coexistence of hyphal compatibility and incompatibility within the same nonself crossing combination has been reported rarely (e.g., in Rosellinia necatrix, Uwamori et al. 2015) and never observed in model filamentous fungi, such as Neurospora crassa or Podospora anserina (Glass et al. 2000; Saupe 2000; Glass and Dementhon 2006). In asymbiotic nonself pairings of AMF, variable behaviors were described: only pre-fusion incompatible hyphal interactions were detected in pairings among geographically different isolates of F. mosseae (Giovannetti et al. 2003), while pre- and post-fusion incompatibility and perfect fusions co-occurred in non-self pairings of R. irregulare isolates (Croll et al. 2009; de la Providencia et al. 2013). On the other hand, only perfect fusions were described in nonself pairings among R. clarus isolates and R. irregulare lineages originating from the same isolate (Cárdenas-Flores et al. 2010; Purin and Morton 2013).

Here, we assessed genetic diversity using RAPD and ISSR-PCR analyses. Such methods, utilized to detect fungal genetic variations because of their highly informative profiles (Molinier et al. 2016; Khan et al. 2017), may show some pitfalls, which we avoided by optimizing PCR parameters affecting reproducibility, obtaining consistent and informative profiles for each lineage’s DNA. As demonstrated by Jaccard similarity, this procedure allowed us to obtain highly similar results from replicate amplifications with which to carry out genetic diversity analyses. When studied by RAPD and ISSR, the five lineages showed a high proportion of uniformly shared bands, with 10 to 25% polymorphic fragments among them, suggesting a low but detectable genetic divergence. The genetic distances matrix obtained by cumulative analysis of RAPD and ISSR profiles suggested that the PI lineage diverged more than the other lineages did, possibly due to specific environmental conditions. It is interesting to compare the similarity obtained from fingerprinting analyses of our five F. mosseae lineages with those calculated from the analyses of six geographically different F. mosseae isolates, incapable of hyphal fusion, including the PI lineage (isolate IMA1, Avio et al. 2009): Jaccard similarity of the five lineages ranged from 0.85 to 0.95, while that of the geographically different F. mosseae isolates ranged from 0.06 to 0.35.

Fingerprinting analyses of members of the same vegetative compatibility group (VCG) of different pathogenic fungal species originating from the same geographic area have shown inconsistent banding patterns by RAPD and AFLP: overall, more similar profiles were produced by fungal isolates belonging to the same VCG, versus those obtained from isolates of other VCGs (Cilliers et al. 2000; Okabe and Matsumoto 2000; Amaradasa et al. 2015). Accordingly, if we consider the F. mosseae lineages that we analyzed as belonging to a single VCG because all pairings showed hyphal fusions, it is worth comparing their genetic divergence with anastomosis ability. Results obtained from Mantel tests show that the phenotypic divergence observed is not mirrored by the genetic divergence detectable with the fingerprinting methods used, because no significant correlation was found between distance matrices computed on hyphal interactions and on molecular data. Likewise, no apparent relation previously was detected among genetic similarity and anastomosing aptitude when asymbiotic mycelia originated from different R. clarus isolates were paired in vitro, but fusions occurred between hyphae of spores collected close to each other in the same habitat (Purin and Morton 2013). Moreover, AFLP analyses of R. irregulare subcultures showed that even if average genetic similarity within the same lineage was higher than between clonal lineages, some spores from different clonal lineages shared more AFLP markers than those of the same one (Cárdenas-Flores et al. 2010). On the contrary, in asymbiotic mycelium of different R. irregulare isolates from the same field, cultured in vitro, a significant negative correlation between genetic distance, assessed by AFLP, and perfect fusion frequencies was reported, suggesting a higher anastomosing ability between genetically similar isolates (Croll et al. 2009). Such variability in results suggests that molecular markers used to genotype AMF isolates tested so far are not strictly representative of the unknown genetic factors regulating anastomosis formation in AMF, and specific regions encoding for transcripts involved in hyphal recognition and fusion are needed to link this particular phenotypic trait with genetic diversity. Indeed, studies on the genetic basis of AMF phenotypic/functional features are particularly challenging, as the wide genetic diversity detected in AMF may be driven by genetic recombination (den Bakker et al. 2010), by the occurrence of heterokaryosis in MAT-like high-mobility group proteins (Riley et al. 2014), and by putative activity of meiosis-related genes (Halary et al. 2011).

In conclusion, divergence among F. mosseae lineages, originated from the same isolate and propagated for 20 years in different conditions, was here demonstrated by the reduction of their ability to form anastomosis and the detection of high levels of VI, both pre-fusion and post-fusion, suggesting that the phenomenon of genetic drift, possibly due to the diverse distribution of nuclei during spore formation, may also involve genes that regulate anastomosis formation.