1 Introduction

Currently, dual-stage actuator systems based on suspension-level secondary actuators are widely used in hard disk drives (HDDs). The dual-stage actuator servo uses a cooperative control of a voice coil motor (VCM) and secondary actuator and has been applied to achieve head positioning on the order of a few tens of nanometer. The VCM has a wide movable range and is used for relatively coarse actuation. The secondary actuator is utilized for precise positioning especially in the higher frequency range. Because the movable range of the secondary actuator is limited and small (e.g., ±0.25–1 μm) (Koganezawa et al. 1998, 2001; Kuwajima et al. 2002; Hirano et al. 2004; Nojima and Koganezawa 2011), stroke saturation of the secondary actuator easily occurs during exposure to a large disturbance. For dual-stage actuators systems, stroke saturation must be prevented to avoid deterioration in the head-positioning accuracy and for stability. An anti-windup controller has been researched to stabilize the dual-stage actuator system to avoid the instability due to stroke saturation (Herrmann et al. 2003). However, this controller causes a decrease in the head-positioning accuracy to some extent. Therefore, minimization of the required secondary-actuator displacement is a fundamental solution to this problem.

2 Reduction in the secondary-actuator displacement

Figure 1 shows an example of the power spectrum of the voltage applied to a secondary actuator when operating in 3.5-inch HDD. Because piezoelectric actuators are used as secondary actuators in this case, the applied voltage is proportional to the secondary actuator displacement. Therefore, a large part of the displacement consists of low-frequency components, as shown in the figure, because the rigid-body-mode vibration induced by the air-flow is the most significant cause of the displacement. Here, a transfer function, y m /d, of the typical dual-stage actuator system shown in Fig. 2 is given by

$$\frac{{y_{m} }}{d} = \frac{{C_{m} P_{m} P_{v} }}{{1 + \left( {1 + KC_{m} } \right)C_{v} P_{v} + C_{m} P_{m} }}$$
(1)

where d is the acceleration disturbance due to the air flow, which is similar to white noise. y m is the secondary-actuator displacement. P v and P m are the plant models of the VCM and secondary actuator, respectively. C v is a VCM controller, and C m is a secondary actuator controller. K is the gain for estimating the secondary-actuator displacement. Equation (1) implies that the secondary-actuator displacement can be decreased if we can design the VCM carriage to have a lower compliance. There are generally two measures for attaining a low compliance for P v : (1) an increase in the moment of inertia of the VCM carriage and (2) an increase in the rotational stiffness that supports the VCM carriage. In either case, these measures cause an increase in the control current or a deterioration in the average seek time. However, the seek performance will not be deteriorated, and the secondary-actuator displacement can be decreased during a tracking operation only if either measure can be selectively activated during a tracking operation.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Power spectrum of the voltage applied to a secondary actuator

Fig. 2
figure 2

Block diagram of a dual-stage actuator system

Assuming that the first resonant-mode frequency f 1 can freely be adjusted by imparting a rotational stiffness, a relationship between f 1 and the required secondary-actuator displacement due to d was calculated as follows.

First, the basic plant models of P v and P m were determined referring to “HDD benchmark problem ver. 3” (Yamaguchi et al. 2012), which provides a typical frequency response function (FRF) of the VCM for benchmarking servo controllers. The VCM plant model P v (s) has seven natural angular frequencies and is given by the following equations:

$$P_{v} \left( s \right) = K_{p} \mathop \sum \limits_{i = 1}^{7} \frac{{A_{i} }}{{s^{2} + 2\zeta_{i} \omega_{i} s + \omega_{i}^{2} }}$$
(2)
$$\omega_{i} = 2\pi f_{i}$$
(3)

where K p is the plant gain and is equal to 3.94 × 109. i is the number of natural modes, A i is the residue of each mode, and ω i is the natural angular frequency for mode i. ζ i is the modal damping ratio. These parameters are listed in Table 1. Then, the secondary actuator was assumed to have a natural frequency of 20 kHz. Its plant model P m (s) is given by

$$P_{m} \left( s \right) = \frac{{B_{m} \omega_{m}^{2} }}{{s^{2} + 2\zeta_{m} \omega_{m} s + \omega_{m}^{2} }}$$
(4)
$$\omega_{m} = 2\pi f_{m}$$
(5)

where B m is the plant gain, ω m is the natural angular frequency, and ζ m is the damping ratio. These parameters are listed in Table 2. Figure 3 shows the FRF of the VCM, P v , when f 1 varies from 90 to 450 Hz in increments of 120 Hz, and Fig. 4 shows the FRF of the secondary-actuator P m .

Table 1 VCM plant parameters
Table 2 Secondary actuator plant parameters
Fig. 3
figure 3

Transfer function of the VCM plant (Pv) in response to f 1

Fig. 4
figure 4

Transfer function of the secondary actuator plant (P m )

Next, the servo controller was designed as a continuous-time system so that the 0-dB crossover frequency of the open loop for the dual-stage actuator system was 4 kHz. The designed controller of C v and C m are as follows:

$$C_{v} = 3.10 \times 10^{ - 3} \times \frac{{\left( {3s + 1000\pi } \right)\left( {s + 200\pi } \right)}}{{s\left( {s + 3000\pi } \right)}} \times C_{N}$$
(6)
$$C_{N} = \mathop \prod \limits_{j = 1}^{5} \frac{{s^{2} + 2\eta_{j} \omega_{j} s + \omega_{j}^{2} }}{{s^{2} + 2\xi_{j} \omega_{j} s + \omega_{j}^{2} }}$$
(7)
$$\omega_{j} = 2\pi f_{j}$$
(8)
$$C_{m} = 8.20 \times \frac{1000\pi }{s + 1000\pi } \times \frac{{s^{2} + 800\pi s + \left( {40000\pi } \right)^{2} }}{{s^{2} + 80000\pi s + \left( {40000\pi } \right)^{2} }}$$
(9)

where C N is a notch filter for the VCM, and its parameters, η j , ξ j , and f j , are listed in Table 3. The open-loop transfer functions in response to f 1 were calculated and are shown in Fig. 5. The gain and phase margins for all cases were 20 dB and 78°, respectively.

Table 3 Parameters for the notch filter of the VCM controller
Fig. 5
figure 5

Open-loop transfer function of the dual-stage actuator system in response to f 1

Figure 6 shows the transfer functions of y m /d, and Fig. 7 shows the conclusive results for the secondary-actuator displacement caused by f 1 assuming that d was white noise. As the basic value of f 1 was 90 Hz, the required displacement was normalized by the displacement in the case where f 1 was 90 Hz. It can be seen that an increase in f 1 decreases the secondary-actuator displacement. When f 1 is 400 Hz, the required displacement decreases to approximately half its basic value. On the other hand, the compliance of the VCM carriage decreases with the increase in f 1 , and the required current must increase.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Transfer functions of y m /d in response to f 1

Fig. 7
figure 7

Secondary-actuator displacement in response to the first resonant frequency

Figure 8 shows the relationship between f 1 and the stiffness at 120 Hz. The stiffness at 120 Hz is proportional to the VCM current for compensating the major repeatable run-out (RRO) component of 120 Hz when disks rotate at 7,200 rpm. Thus, an increase in the stiffness at 120 Hz roughly indicates an increase in the required current. When f 1 increases to 400 Hz, the required current is approximately 10 times that at 90 Hz, although the power consumption for tracking is very small compared with seek operations. Thus, there is a trade-off between the secondary-actuator displacement and the VCM current. An adequate value for f 1 should be determined considering this trade-off relationship.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Stiffness of the VCM at 120 Hz in response to the first resonant frequency

In this study, an actuator, which can impart a rotational stiffness to the VCM carriage on demand, was investigated. The mechanism and characteristics of the actuator are discussed in this paper. In addition, we considered the possibility of a new control scheme for dual-stage actuators employing the actuator during a tracking operation. Although the actuator design is unsophisticated, it is functional enough to study the feasibility of the imparting-on-demand mechanism.

3 Electromagnetic actuator

In this section, the developed actuator that can impart a rotational stiffness will be described. Figure 9 shows a schematic of the developed electromagnetic actuator. The stator of the actuator consists of a stator yoke, which is the fixed part on the HDD base; a magnetic-material bobbin; and a coil, which is wound around the bobbin. A cross-shaped flat spring, whose outer circular area is fixed to the stator yoke and whose inner area is fixed to the moving shaft, connects the moving part and stator. The moving part consists of a moving shaft and magnetic-material moving plate. There is a small gap of approximately 100 μm between the stator yoke and the moving plate. When current is applied to the coil, a magnetic flux is generated in the bobbin, and magnetic attraction occurs between the stator yoke and the moving plate. Thus, the moving part moves upward.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Schematic of the developed electromagnetic actuator

Figure 10 shows the prototype actuator, and Fig. 11 shows a photograph of the actuator in use with a VCM carriage. The electromagnetic actuator was placed between the HDD base and the VCM carriage. During seek operations, the actuator is suspended, and the VCM can rotate freely as in normal HDDs. During tracking operations, the actuator is activated, and the top surface of the moving shaft of the actuator comes into contact with the VCM carriage. A friction force acts between the VCM carriage and the moving shaft, and the VCM becomes supported by the actuator structure, thereby imparting a rotational stiffness to the VCM, which is determined by the stiffness in the in-plane direction of the flat spring. When the current is no longer supplied to the coil, the moving plate returns to its original position by the spring force of the flat spring, and the carriage is free to rotate.

Fig. 10
figure 10

Photograph of the prototype electromagnetic actuator

Fig. 11
figure 11

Photograph of the VCM carriage and developed electromagnetic actuator

The design specifications of the actuator are listed in Table 4. The height of the prototype actuator is 4 mm, and the outer diameter is 15 mm. Because the prototype actuator is all hand-made, its size is too large, and a downsized design is necessary for application to multiple-platter HDDs. The supply voltage is 5 V, and the generation force should be >30 mN. The flat spring was made of a phosphor copper bronze sheet (C5191P-H). The stiffness of the flat spring in the out-of-plane direction is related to its operating time, and the stiffness in the in-plane direction is related to the rotational stiffness imparted to the VCM. The magnetic material of the yoke and bobbin was carbon steel (S15C), and the moving shaft was made of aluminum.

Table 4 Design specifications for the electromagnetic actuator

4 Evaluation of the prototype actuator

Figure 12 shows the displacement of the moving shaft when a 50 Hz sinusoidal current is applied to the coil. Regardless of the current direction, a magnetic attractive force activates the same direction, and the displacement of the moving shaft is always upward. Because the attractive force is a function of the square of the applied current, the frequency of the displacement becomes twice the frequency of the current. Figure 13 shows the maximum contact force generated by the magnetic attractive force in response to an applied current. The maximum force, by which the moving plate was detached from the stator yoke when a current was applied, was measured by a load cell. The filled circles indicate the force measured with a load cell, and the solid line indicates the theoretical curve calculated by the following equation:

$$F = K\left( z \right)\frac{{\left( {NI} \right)^{2} }}{{2\mu_{0} }} - kz$$
(10)

where N is the number of turns of the coil and is 252, and μ 0 is the absolute permeability in vacuum. K(z) is a coefficient, which depends on a permeance coefficient, and is a function of the gap thickness z. k is the stiffness in the out-of-plane direction of the flat spring and is 5,000 N/m. According to Fig. 13, the actuator generates a large enough contact force. The measured gap thickness between the stator yoke and the moving plate was 62.4 μm. The operation time of the actuator was 0.9 ms at 145 mA, which satisfied the design specifications.

Fig. 12
figure 12

Displacement of the moving shaft when a 50-Hz sinusoidal current is applied

Fig. 13
figure 13

Contact force generated by the actuator

4.1 Actuator evaluation using an HDD-like tool

Figure 14 shows the HDD-like tool for actuator evaluation that consists of a spindle motor, which rotates 7,200 rpm; a VCM carriage; a 270° shroud; a clear cover; and the developed actuator. Two disks with a diameter of 95 mm and a thickness of 1.27 mm were stacked on the spindle motor. The 270° shroud surrounded the disks. The actuator was placed between the base and the VCM carriage to impart a rotational stiffness to the carriage. The contact point of the moving shaft is 17 mm from the rotational axis of the VCM. The measured clearance between the carriage arm and the moving shaft was approximately 50 μm.

Fig. 14
figure 14

HDD-like tool for air-flow-induced vibration of the carriage arm

The air-flow-induced carriage vibration of the carriage-arm tip between the two disks was measured with a laser Doppler vibrometer (LDV). The VCM carriage was always supported by another spring, which has a low rotational stiffness to keep the carriage from moving for stable laser reflection during LVD measurement.

Figure 15 shows the power spectra of the carriage-arm-tip vibration induced by the air-flow with the developed actuator suspended and activated. When the actuator is suspended, the carriage vibration is large, and a resonance appears at 60 Hz. This resonant frequency is determined by the spring for LDV measurement and the moment of inertia of the VCM carriage. When the actuator is activated with an electrical current of 0.15 A, a resonance appears at 930 Hz, and the spectrum gain is flat below the resonant frequency. This is because a rotational stiffness was imparted by the contact between the VCM carriage and the moving shaft. The contact force was estimated at 1.24 N from Eq. (10). According to these results, air-flow-induced carriage vibration was largely suppressed by imparting a rotational stiffness effectively. However, a lower rotational stiffness should be better for the general dual-stage servo as mentioned in Sect. 2 from a power-consumption perspective, which can be achieved by a narrower design for the flat spring. Note that the measurement noise of the LDV was observed to be less than 300 Hz. Considering that the acceleration disturbance due to the air-flow is similar to white noise, the vibration spectrum without LDV noise was estimated to be the average of the values between 300 and 500 Hz. The estimated vibration spectra are indicated by the bold line in Fig. 15. For the suspended case, however, the LDV noise was ignored because it only had an effect at frequencies less than 50 Hz, and its effects on the NRPE and secondary-actuator displacement were small. This is because the gains of the sensitivity function and y m /d were low enough at frequencies less than 50 Hz.

Fig. 15
figure 15

Power spectra of carriage vibration

4.2 Consideration of the feasibility of a new servo system

In the previous section, the carriage-vibration spectra when the actuator was activated and suspended were determined. It was observed that the VCM vibration was sufficiently suppressed by activating the developed actuator. Therefore, the VCM controller gain for a general dual-stage actuator system does not need to be high in this case. Then, we considered the feasibility of a new control system for dual-stage actuators with the developed actuator. In the new servo system, a secondary-actuator servo (SAS), the VCM follows only the RRO using feed-forward control, and the secondary actuator follows the other component in which non-repeatable run-out (NRRO) is mainly included. The secondary actuator was the same as that in Fig. 4. The block diagram of the SAS is shown in Fig. 16. The controller for the SAS was also designed as a continuous-time system so that the 0-dB crossover frequency of the open loop was set to 4 kHz. The designed controller for SAS is as follows:

$$C_{SAS} = 20.8 \times \frac{400\pi }{s + 400\pi } \times \frac{{s^{2} + 800\pi s + \left( {40000\pi } \right)^{2} }}{{s^{2} + 80000\pi s + \left( {40000\pi } \right)^{2} }}$$
(11)
Fig. 16
figure 16

Block diagram of the SAS

Figures 17 and 18 show the open-loop transfer function and sensitivity function, respectively. The gain and phase margins of the SAS were 19.8 dB and 70°, respectively. From the transfer functions and power spectra of the VCM vibration at outer, center, and inner tracks, the position error and secondary-actuator displacement due to d were calculated.

Fig. 17
figure 17

Open-loop transfer function of the SAS

Fig. 18
figure 18

Sensitivity function comparison of the dual-stage actuator system and SAS

Figure 19 shows the power spectra of the position errors of the dual-stage actuator system and SAS. The SAS largely suppressed disturbances at frequencies less than 1 kHz compared with the dual-stage actuator system. Table 5 lists three times the standard deviation (3σ) of the non-repeatable position error (NRPE). The NRPE of the SAS was reduced by 35 to 42 %.

Fig. 19
figure 19

Power spectra of the NRPE

Table 5 3σ of the NRPE (nm)

Figure 20 shows the spectra of the secondary-actuator displacement. The displacement of the SAS is greatly reduced in the frequency range less than 1.3 kHz. Table 6 lists 3σ of the secondary-actuator displacement. The displacement of the SAS was reduced by 52 % on average. Therefore, the SAS can not only improve the head-positioning error but also reduce the secondary-actuator displacement. The drawback of the SAS is that the electric current for compensating the 120-Hz RRO component becomes 60 times greater than that for typical VCM servos in this case.

Fig. 20
figure 20

Power spectra of the secondary-actuator displacement

Table 6 3σ of the secondary-actuator displacement (nm)

5 Conclusion

In this study, a reduction in the secondary-actuator displacement was investigated by imparting a rotational stiffness to the VCM carriage. It was clearly demonstrated that an increase in the first resonant frequency of the VCM greatly decreases the secondary-actuator displacement. On the other hand, the compliance of the VCM decreases with an increase in the resonant frequency, and the required current must increase.

An electromagnetic actuator, which can impart a rotational stiffness to the VCM, was designed and fabricated. The actuator generated a force >30 mN and was able to impart a rotational stiffness to the VCM effectively.

We also considered a new control system, called the SAS, for dual-stage actuators that employed an additional electromagnetic actuator. It was confirmed that the SAS reduced the head-positioning errors due to air-flow-induced carriage vibration by more than 35 % compared with a conventional dual-stage actuator system. Furthermore, the secondary-actuator stroke was reduced by 52 % on average.