Abstract
Objectives
To provide updated clinico-epidemiological information on chronic pancreatitis (CP) in Japan.
Methods
We conducted a two-stage nationwide epidemiological survey; the number of CP patients was estimated in the first-stage survey, and their clinical features were examined in the second-stage survey. We surveyed patients with CP who had visited hospitals in 2016 and were diagnosed according to the Japanese diagnostic criteria 2009 (DC2009). Furthermore, we validated the new Japanese diagnostic criteria (DC2019) in patients with early CP diagnosed according to DC2009.
Results
The number of patients with definite/probable CP in 2016 was 56,520 (prevalence, 44.5 per 100,000 persons), and that of early CP was 4470 (prevalence, 3.5 per 100,000 persons). We obtained detailed clinical information of 2150 patients with definite/probable CP and 249 patients with early CP. Compared with the early CP cases, the definite/probable CP cases had higher proportions of male (4.8 vs. 1.3), alcohol-related etiology (72.0% vs. 45.8%), smoking history (69.6% vs. 41.0%), diabetes mellitus (42.3% vs. 19.3%), and past history of acute pancreatitis (AP) (50.4% vs. 22.1%). Among the patients with early CP diagnosed according to DC2009, 93 (37.3%) were diagnosed with early CP according to DC2019, but the diagnosis of the remaining 156 (62.7%) patients was downgraded. Alcohol-related etiology, smoking history, early disease onset, and past history of AP were associated with the maintenance of early CP diagnosis in DC2019.
Conclusion
We clarified the current status of CP in Japan. Further validation studies are warranted to clarify the diagnostic utility of DC2019.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is defined in the recently proposed mechanistic definition [1] as a pathologic fibro-inflammatory syndrome of the pancreas in individuals with genetic, environmental and/or other risk factors who develop persistent pathologic responses to parenchymal injury or stress. When advanced, symptoms including severe chronic pain, maldigestion, and diabetes mellitus (DM) profoundly hindered the quality of life of the patients [1,2,3]. CP is a well-known risk factor for pancreatic cancer [1,2,3]. To clarify the clinico-epidemiological status of CP, nationwide epidemiological surveys have been conducted in Japan mainly by the Research Committee of Intractable Pancreatic Diseases, under the support of the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan, every 4–5 years [4,5,6,7]. The number of CP patients was estimated to be 32,000 in 1994 [4], 42,000 in 1999 [5], 45,200 in 2002 [6], 47,100 in 2007 [7], and 66,980 in 2011 [8]. In addition to the trend of the number of patients with CP, these surveys revealed the clinical practice of CP including etiology, diagnosis, and management in Japan [9]. Up-to-date information in real-world clinical practice is essential for better understanding and management of CP as well as the validation and revision of the diagnostic criteria and guidelines.
In 2009, the Japanese clinical diagnostic criteria for CP were proposed (DC2009) [10]. DC2009 was unique in that the world’s first diagnostic criteria for early CP were proposed, aiming to improve the long-term prognosis of patients with CP by early diagnosis and therapeutic intervention [10]. Thereafter, a nationwide epidemiological survey of early CP and prospective study of patients with early CP were conducted to validate DC2009 [11, 12]. The nationwide survey revealed that the clinical profiles differed between patients with early CP and those with definite CP [11]. In a prospective study, DC2009 could identify some patients before the progression to definite CP, but the majority of the patients did not progress [12]. These studies suggested the need to revise DC2009 to select patients who eventually progress to definite CP more specifically. In 2019, the Japan Pancreas Society proposed the revised DC2009, namely, “Clinical diagnostic criteria for CP 2019 (DC2019)” [13]. DC2019 has several characteristic features, including (i) incorporation of mechanistic definition of CP, (ii) revision of diagnostic items for early CP, and (iii) upgrading magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) as an imaging modality (Table 1, Supplementary Table 1, Supplementary Table 2).
To provide updates on clinic-epidemiological information of CP and early CP in Japan, we conducted a nationwide epidemiological survey of CP and early CP according to DC2009. In addition, we validated DC2019 in patients with early CP diagnosed according to DC2009.
Materials and methods
We conducted a two-stage survey. The first-stage survey aimed to estimate the number of patients with CP and early CP, and the second-stage survey aimed to elucidate the clinical features of CP and early CP. This study was performed in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine (article#: 2015-1-519, 2017-1-163, 2018-1-409).
Diagnosis of CP and early CP according to DC2009
Definite and probable CP was diagnosed according to DC2009 [10] based on the imaging criteria for definite and probable CP findings, respectively. If the subjects had probable CP findings and two or more of the first three clinical signs, they were diagnosed as having definite CP. In DC2009, early CP was diagnosed using a combination of four clinical signs (recurrent upper abdominal pain, abnormal pancreatic enzyme levels in the serum or urine, abnormal pancreatic exocrine function, and continuous heavy drinking of alcohol equivalent to or more than 80 g/day of pure ethanol) and imaging findings of early CP on endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (Supplementary Table 3). Early CP can be diagnosed if a patient does not justify a diagnosis of definite or probable CP, but satisfies at least two of four clinical signs and imaging findings of early CP.
Diagnosis of early CP according to DC2019
In DC2019 [13], early CP was diagnosed using a combination of five clinical signs (recurrent upper abdominal or back pain, abnormal pancreatic enzyme levels in the serum or urine, abnormal pancreatic exocrine function, continuous heavy drinking of alcohol equivalent to or more than 60 g/day of pure ethanol or mutation in the pancreatitis-associated gene such as PRSS1 and SPINK1, and past history of acute pancreatitis [AP]) and imaging findings on EUS, MRCP, or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (Table 1). Imaging findings on EUS were consolidated from 7 items in DC2009 to 4 items; lobularities with and without honeycombing were consolidated to lobularity; hyperechoic foci without shadowing and stranding were consolidated to hyperechoic foci (non-shadowing) or strands; and cysts were removed from the diagnostic items. Early CP can be diagnosed if a patient does not justify a diagnosis of definite or probable CP, but satisfies at least three of five clinical signs and imaging findings of early CP (Supplementary Fig. 1).
First-stage survey
Our target subjects were patients with CP who visited the selected hospitals in 2016. The list of hospitals for the survey was based on the hospital yearbook 2016 (R&D Co., Ltd., Nagoya, Japan). We obtained a list of critical care and emergency centers from the website of the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (https://www.jaam.jp/html/shisetsu/qq-center.htm). The departments of internal medicine, gastroenterology, surgery, and digestive surgery were listed and subjected to stratified random sampling. The sampling rates were approximately 5, 10, 20, 40, 80, 100, and 100% for the stratum of hospitals with less than 100, 100–199, 200–299, 300–399, 400–499, and 500 beds or more, and affiliated university hospitals, respectively. Because this survey also dealt with AP [14], critical care and emergency centers were classified as a special stratum and all of them were selected for the survey.
In June 2017, a questionnaire asking the number of CP patients who visited their hospitals in 2016 was directly mailed to 2502 departments randomly chosen as described earlier [15]. After the collection of the first questionnaire online, the number of patients with CP, along with the 95% confidence interval (CI), was estimated based on the assumption that the response from departments was independent of the frequency of patients using the formulae as previously described [16, 17]. We used the population of Japan in 2016 (n = 126,933,000) to calculate the incidence rate.
Second-stage survey
In June 2018, we sent the second questionnaire to the departments reporting that they had patients with CP or early CP in the first questionnaire. The second questionnaire was collected online by the end of March 2019. Because some items of the questionnaire were unanswered, the number of patients subjected to analyses varied among the items.
Statistical analysis
Unknown or undescribed cases were excluded from the statistical analysis. Continuous variables are shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and were compared using Student’s t-test. For the comparison of proportions, we used the chi-square test and Fisher's exact test (when there is at least one cell in the contingency table of the expected frequencies below five). Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS version 20.0 statistical analysis software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) or JMP Pro version 14 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). P value < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results
First-stage survey
A total of 854 out of 2502 departments responded to the first questionnaire (response rate, 34.1%) and 10,339 patients with CP and 1028 patients with early CP were reported (Supplementary Table 4). We estimated the number of patients with CP as 56,520 (95% CI 50,760–62,270), with a prevalence rate of 44.5 per 100,000 persons, and that of patients with newly-diagnosed CP as 14,740 (95% CI 13,150–16,330), with an incidence of 11.6 per 100,000 persons. In the case of early CP, the estimated number of patients with early CP was 4470 (95% CI 3640–5290), with a prevalence rate of 3.5 per 100,000 persons, and that of patients with newly-diagnosed early CP was 1680 (95% CI 1430–1930), with an incidence of 1.3 per 100,000 persons. Compared with the 2011 surveys [8, 11], the estimated numbers of patients with CP and early CP were decreased by 15.6 and 17.2%, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 2).
Second-stage survey
In the second survey, we obtained detailed clinical information in 2,150 (1914 definite and 236 probable) patients with CP and 249 patients with early CP.
Clinical profiles of definite/probable CP cases
The male-to-female sex ratio was 4.8:1 (1777 men and 373 women). The mean age (SD) was 61.9 (13.3) years: 62.2 (12.6) years in men and 60.2 (16.4) years in women (Fig. 1). The most affected ages were 60–69 years in both male and female patients. The mean age at disease onset was 54.5 (15.2) years: 54.9 (14.3) in males and 52.5 (18.6) years in females (Supplementary Fig. 3).
Alcoholic and idiopathic CP accounted for 72.0 and 23.7% of cases, respectively. Alcohol was the most common cause (79.1%) in male patients, while idiopathic was the most common cause in female patients (55.0%). Smoking history was reported in 1970 cases, and 1372 (69.6%) were smokers (750 current and 622 ex-smokers). A total of 992 (561 current and 431 past) out of 1243 (79.8%) patients with alcoholic CP and 193/465 (41.5%) patients with idiopathic CP had a smoking history. If stratified by sex, 1247/1623 (76.8%) male and 125/347 (36.0%) female patients with CP had a smoking history. These figures were higher than those in the Japanese general population between 50 and 59 years (54.3% in men and 16.3% in women) in 2016. Previous AP episodes were reported in 1024/2032 (50.4%) cases.
The complications are shown in Table 3. DM was reported in 893/2112 (42.3%) patients, and pancreatic exocrine dysfunction was reported in 524/1596 (32.8%) patients. For the assessment of pancreatic exocrine dysfunction, the N-benzoyl-l-tyrosyl-p-aminobenzoic acid (BT-PABA) test was performed in 268/2136 (12.5%) cases, and the results were reported in 255 cases. Urinary PABA excretion was decreased (≤ 70%) in 172 (67.5%) cases. Pancreatic calcifications and pseudocysts were reported in 1435/2130 (67.4%) and 532/2120 (25.1%) cases, respectively. We compared the frequency of complications between patients with alcoholic CP and idiopathic CP. Compared with idiopathic CP, alcoholic CP had a higher frequency of calcifications, pseudocysts, bile duct stenosis, pseudoaneurysm, ascites, pleural effusion, and duodenal stenosis.
Table 4 shows the treatment. Camostat mesilate, a protease inhibitor, was used in 1205/1977 (61.0%) cases. Digestive enzymes were used in 756/2057 (36.8%) cases. Among the 172 patients with pancreatic exocrine dysfunction on the BT-PABA test, 97 (56.4%) received enzyme therapy. The name of the digestive enzymes was reported in 728 cases; pancrelipase was most commonly used in 522 (71.7%) cases, followed by berizym combination granules in 118 (16.2%) and excelase combination granules in 51 (7.0%) cases. Endoscopic therapy was performed in 707/2121 (33.3%) cases, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in 328/2107 (15.6%), and surgery in 345/2091 (16.5%). Compared with idiopathic CP, alcoholic CP had a higher frequency of patients receiving camostat mesilate, digestive enzymes, endoscopic therapy, and surgery.
Clinical profiles of early CP cases
We collected detailed clinical information on 249 patients (141 men and 108 women; male-to-female ratio, 1.3:1) fulfilling the diagnostic criteria for early CP according to the DC2009. The distributions of age stratified by sex are shown in Supplementary Fig. 4. The mean age (SD) was 59.7 (12.8) years: 61.6 (12.8) in men and 57.1 (13.7) in women. The mean age at disease onset was 54.5 (14.1) years: 56.2 (14.2) in men and 52.4 (13.7) in women. Idiopathic and alcohol were the two most common etiologies, accounting for 51.0 and 45.8% of cases, respectively. In male patients, the most common cause was alcoholic (65.2%), followed by idiopathic (30.5%). In female patients, idiopathic pancreatitis accounted for the majority of the cases (77.8%).
Of the 249 patients with early CP, 177 (71.1%) fulfilled 2 clinical signs in the diagnostic criteria, 63 (25.3%) patients fulfilled 3, and 9 (3.6%) fulfilled 4. A total of 221 (88.8%) patients had recurrent upper abdominal pain, and 195 (78.3%) had abnormal pancreatic enzyme levels in the serum or urine. Sixty-seven (26.5%) patients had pancreatic exocrine dysfunction. Ninety-six (38.6%) patients, all alcoholic early CP, had a history of continuous heavy alcohol consumption equivalent to or more than 80 g/day of pure ethanol. Of note, 19/114 (16.7%) patients were diagnosed with alcoholic early CP although the amount of alcohol consumption was less than 80 g/day. Fifty-five (22.1%) patients had a past history of AP. Patients with a past history of AP had earlier disease onset than those without (49.5 ± 15.8 years vs. 55.9 ± 13.3 years; P = 0.023).
Comparison of clinical profiles between the definite/probable CP and early CP cases
We then compared the clinical profiles of 249 patients with early CP with those of 2150 patients with definite/probable CP (Table 5). The proportions of female cases and idiopathic cases were higher in patients with early CP compared with those in patients with definite/probable CP. The mean age at disease onset was 54.5 years in both groups. The proportions of patients with smoking history, DM, and past history of AP were lower in patients with early CP than in those with definite/probable CP. Of note, age at disease onset in patients with early CP with a past history of AP was 49.5 ± 15.8 years, which was younger than that in patients with definite/probable CP (P = 0.004).
Validation of DC2019 in patients with early CP diagnosed according to DC2009
The Japan Pancreas Society proposed the revised clinical diagnostic criteria for CP in 2019 (DC2019) [13]. Although the definition of continuous alcohol drinking was decreased to 60 g/day of pure ethanol, and pancreatitis-associated gene mutation and past history of AP were newly incorporated, three, but not two, diagnostic items are required for the diagnosis of early CP in DC2019. Similar EUS findings were consolidated; lobularities with and without honeycombing were consolidated to lobularity, and hyperechoic foci without shadowing and stranding were consolidated to hyperechoic foci (non-shadowing) or strands. We therefore validated DC2019 in patients with early CP diagnosed according to DC2009. Among the 249 patients with early CP diagnosed according to DC2009, the diagnosis of 93 (37.3%) patients remained as early CP, and that of 156 (62.7%) patients was downgraded because they did not fulfill the DC2019 due to the number of positive clinical features < 3 (n = 112, 71.8%), the number of EUS findings < 2 (n = 23, 14.7%), and both (n = 21, 13.5%). Therefore, revision of the clinical features affected the diagnosis more than that of EUS findings. Among the 177 patients whose positive diagnostic items were two in DC2009, 37 patients fulfilled DC2019 because they had past history of AP (n = 27), drinking history of ≥ 60 g in ethanol (n = 6), both past history of AP and drinking history of ≥ 60 g in ethanol (n = 3), and a SPINK1 mutation (n = 1). The diagnosis of the 156 downgraded cases according to DC2019 was as follows: possible early CP in 112 cases, possible CP in 23 cases, and other diseases (if any) in 21 cases.
We compared the clinical profiles between the 93 patients whose diagnosis remained as early CP (“early CP group”) and those whose diagnosis was downgraded according to DC2019 (“downgraded group”). The numbers of positive clinical signs and EUS findings were higher in the early CP group than in the downgraded group. Alcohol-related etiology, smoking history, early disease onset, and past history of AP were associated with the maintenance of early CP diagnosis according to DC2019 (Table 6). Regarding the EUS findings in DC2019, lobularity was more frequently detected in the early CP group than in the downgraded group (P = 0.016).
Discussion
Here, we conducted a nationwide epidemiological survey to clarify the current status of CP in Japan. The estimated number of patients with definite/probable CP in 2016 was 56,520, with a prevalence rate of 44.5 per 100,000 persons, and that of patients with newly diagnosed CP was 14,740, with an incidence of 11.6 per 100,000 persons. These figures are roughly similar to those in Western countries. A meta-analysis of three studies showed that the annual incidence of CP was 9.6 per 100,000 persons [18]. The prevalence of CP in Europe ranges from 44.0 to 143 per 100,000 persons [19, 20] and from 41.8 to 91.9 per 100,000 persons in the United States [21, 22]. Compared with those in the 2011 survey [8], the prevalence and incidence of CP in Japan decreased in 2016 by 15.6 and 17.2%, respectively. As in the case of other Western countries, the consumption of alcohol and tobacco, the two major risk factors for CP [1,2,3], has been decreasing in the last two decades in Japan (https://www.nta.go.jp/english/publication/agency_report/index.htm) (https://www.mhlw.go.jp/bunya/kenkou/kenkou_eiyou_chousa.html). Importantly, alcohol consumption and smoking ratio in women, especially young women, are steady. In females, the proportion of alcoholic CP increased from 29.5% in 2011 to 37.6% in 2016. The smoking ratio in these patients in women was 70.4%, which is much higher than that in the general female population (8.2%). Female patients develop alcoholic CP at younger ages, with shorter duration and smaller cumulative amounts of alcohol consumption than male patients [23]. Proper lifestyle management of female patients with pancreatitis requires more attention.
Compared with patients with idiopathic CP, those with alcoholic CP developed complications and required treatments including endoscopic therapy and surgery more frequently. This is consistent with previous studies showing that patients with alcoholic CP have a more severe course of CP than those with idiopathic CP [24, 25]. Very recently, Olesen et al. [26] reported distinct complication clusters associated with etiological risk factors. They showed that alcoholic etiology was associated with inflammatory complications such as pseudocysts, ascites, and pleural effusion, whereas smoking was associated with fibrosis-related complications such as pancreatic duct lesions, common bile duct stenosis, and duodenal stenosis [26]. On the other hand, although enzyme therapy was more frequently performed in patients with alcoholic CP, we were unable to demonstrate an association between alcoholic etiology and pancreatic exocrine dysfunction. One explanation may be the difficulty in diagnosing pancreatic exocrine dysfunction in Japan due to the limited availability and accuracy of the pancreatic exocrine function test. Currently, the BT-PABA test is the only test covered by medical insurance. The fecal elastase-1 test, which is commonly performed in Europe [27], cannot be used in daily practice in Japan. The BT-PABA test indirectly measures the pancreatic exocrine function, but it is not feasible, less sensitive, and less specific [28]. In this survey, the BT-PABA test was performed in only 12.5% of cases. Importantly, even in patients showing pancreatic exocrine dysfunction on the BT-PABA test, nearly half of the patients did not receive pancreatic enzyme therapy. Proper diagnosis and management of pancreatic exocrine dysfunction are essential to improve the quality of life in patients with CP.
A previous nationwide survey in 2011 and prospective study of early CP showed that the clinical profiles differed between the patients with definite CP and early CP [11, 12]. This 2016 survey confirmed this finding: a higher proportion of female and idiopathic cases but lower proportions of cases with smoking history, DM, and past history of AP in early CP. These results further support the need to revise DC2009 to select patients who are likely to progress more efficiently. In DC2019 [13], we focused on the assessment of risk factors for CP; we adopted past history of AP and genetic factors as new diagnostic items. AP and recurrent AP are important processes leading to early CP in the mechanistic definition [1]. Although the age at disease onset was similar between the patients with definite/probable CP and early CP, it was earlier in patients with early CP with a history of AP than in those with definite/probable CP. Regarding genetic factors, we identified p.R122H and p.N29I mutations in the PRSS1 gene and p.N34S and c.194 + 2 T > C mutations in the SPINK1 gene as typical pancreatitis-associated mutations in DC2019. In the Japanese diagnostic criteria for hereditary pancreatitis (HP) [29], the diagnosis of HP can be made in the presence of these PRSS1 mutations, even if a family history of pancreatitis was absent. A meta-analysis of 24 studies showed that the overall risk of CP due to the SPINK1 p.N34S mutation was 11.0-fold, of which 15.0-fold for idiopathic CP [30]. A meta-analysis of 13 studies showed that the SPINK1 c.194 + 2 T > C mutation is a very strong risk factor in East Asia, where this mutation increases the CP risk by 73.2-fold [31] In addition, in a nationwide survey of HP in Japan, PRSS1 and SPINK1 mutations were found in 41 and 36% of the families, respectively [32]. Currently, genetic testing of pancreatitis-associated genes is not covered by medical insurance and conducted on a research basis in Japan. The inclusion of other pancreatitis-associated mutations, such as the recently identified TRPV6 [33] in the diagnostic criteria, requires further discussion.
Among the 249 patients with early CP diagnosed according to DC2009, the diagnosis of 37% of cases remained as early CP, but that of the remaining 63% was downgraded mainly due to insufficient fulfillment of the diagnostic items. This finding was expected because DC2019 intended to increase the specificity of its diagnostic ability [13]. The maintenance of early CP diagnosis was associated with alcohol-related etiology, smoking history, early disease onset, and the presence of a past history of AP. These profiles are similar to those in patients with definite/probable CP, suggesting the ability of DC2019 to identify patients who are at a high risk for progression more efficiently. Incorporation of MRCP findings would contribute to the diagnosis of early CP in daily practice because EUS is not widely performed and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is rarely performed for the diagnosis of CP in Japan. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate DC2019.
This study has several limitations. This is a retrospective study, and cases reported in the second survey did not fully resemble the 56,520 estimated CP cases because cases reported from small hospitals were limited due to the low sampling and response rates. The overall response rate in the first survey (34.1%) was lower than that in the 2011 survey (45.8%). Nevertheless, this study has several strengths. We could assess the trend of the estimated numbers of patients with CP over decades because we used the same framework of the previous nationwide epidemiological surveys. Detailed clinical information, including diagnosis, lifestyle, imaging findings, and management, was available in more than 2000 patients treated across Japan in a single year. This is the first study to validate DC2019 in patients with early CP diagnosed according to DC2009. We expect that the up-to-date information obtained in this study would contribute to the improved prognosis of patients with this intractable disease.
Abbreviations
- AP:
-
Acute pancreatitis
- BT-PABA:
-
N-benzoyl-l-tyrosyl-p-aminobenzoic acid
- CI:
-
Confidence interval
- CP:
-
Chronic pancreatitis
- DC:
-
Japanese clinical diagnostic criteria for chronic pancreatitis
- DM:
-
Diabetes mellitus
- EUS:
-
Endoscopic ultrasonography
- HP:
-
Hereditary pancreatitis: MRCP, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography
- SD:
-
Standard deviation
References
Whitcomb DC, Frulloni L, Garg P, et al. Chronic pancreatitis: an international draft consensus proposal for a new mechanistic definition. Pancreatology. 2016;16:218–24.
Singh VK, Yadav D, Garg PK. Diagnosis and management of chronic pancreatitis: a review. JAMA. 2019;322:2422–34.
Kleeff J, Whitcomb DC, Shimosegawa T, et al. Chronic pancreatitis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17060.
Lin Y, Tamakoshi A, Matsuno S, et al. Nationwide epidemiological survey of chronic pancreatitis in Japan. J Gastroenterol. 2000;35:136–41.
Otsuki M. Chronic pancreatitis in Japan: epidemiology, prognosis, diagnostic criteria, and future problems. J Gastroenterol. 2003;38:315–26.
Tashiro M, Nishimori I, Otsuki M, et al. Nationwide epidemiological survey of chronic pancreatitis in Japan. Pancreas. 2005;31:473 (abstract).
Hirota M, Shimosegawa T, Masamune A, et al. The sixth nationwide epidemiological survey of chronic pancreatitis in Japan. Pancreatology. 2012;12:79–84.
Hirota M, Shimosegawa T, Masamune A, et al. The seventh nationwide epidemiological survey for chronic pancreatitis in Japan: clinical significance of smoking habit in Japanese patients. Pancreatology. 2014;14:490–6.
Ito T, Ishiguro H, Ohata H, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for chronic pancreatitis 2015. J Gastroenterol. 2016;51:85–92.
Shimosegawa T, Kataoka K, Kamisawa T, et al. The revised Japanese clinical diagnostic criteria for chronic pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol. 2010;45:584–91.
Masamune A, Kikuta K, Nabeshima T, et al. Nationwide epidemiological survey of early chronic pancreatitis in Japan. J Gastroenterol. 2017;52:992–1000.
Masamune A, Nabeshima T, Kikuta K, et al. Prospective study of early CP diagnosed based on the Japanese diagnostic criteria. J Gastroenterol. 2019;54:928–35.
Japan Pancreas Society. Clinical diagnostic criteria for chronic pancreatitis 2019. J Jpn Pancreas Soc (Suizou). 2019;34:279–81 (in Japanese).
Masamune A, Kikuta K, Hamada S, et al. Clinical practice of acute pancreatitis in Japan: an analysis of nationwide epidemiological survey in 2016. Pancreatology. 2020;20:629–36.
Masamune A, Kikuta K, Hamada S, et al. Nationwide epidemiological survey of autoimmune pancreatitis in Japan in 2016. J Gastroenterol. 2020;55:462–70.
Wakai K, Ohta A, Tamakoshi A, et al. Estimated prevalence and incidence of adult Still's disease: findings by a nationwide epidemiological survey in Japan. J Epidemiol. 1997;7:221–5.
Kuriyama S, Kusaka Y, Fujimura M, et al. Prevalence and clinicoepidemiological features of moyamoya disease in Japan: findings from a nationwide epidemiological survey. Stroke. 2008;39:42–7.
Xiao AY, Tan ML, Wu LM, et al. Global incidence and mortality of pancreatic diseases: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of population-based cohort studies. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;1:45–55.
Capurso G, Archibugi L, Pasquali P, et al. Prevalence of chronic pancreatitis: results of a primary care physician-based population study. Dig Liver Dis. 2017;49:535–9.
Lévy P, Domínguez-Muñoz E, Imrie C, et al. Epidemiology of chronic pancreatitis: burden of the disease and consequences. United European Gastroenterol J. 2014;2:345–54.
Yadav D, Timmons L, Benson JT, et al. Incidence, prevalence, and survival of chronic pancreatitis: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:2192–9.
Sellers ZM, MacIsaac D, Yu H, et al. Nationwide trends in acute and chronic pancreatitis among privately insured children and non-elderly adults in the United States, 2007–2014. Gastroenterology. 2018;155:469–78.e1.
Masamune A, Kume K, Shimosegawa T. Sex and age differences in alcoholic pancreatitis in Japan: a multicenter nationwide survey. Pancreas. 2013;42:578–83.
Ammann RW, Buehler H, Muench R, et al. Differences in the natural history of idiopathic (nonalcoholic) and alcoholic chronic pancreatitis. a comparative long-term study of 287 patients. Pancreas. 1987;2:368–77.
Hao L, Wang LS, Liu Y, et al. The different course of alcoholic and idiopathic chronic pancreatitis: a long-term study of 2037 patients. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0198365.
Olesen SS, Nøjgaard C, Poulsen JL, et al. Chronic pancreatitis is characterized by distinct complication clusters that associate with etiological risk factors. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019;114:656–64.
Vanga RR, Tansel A, Sidiq S, et al. Diagnostic performance of measurement of fecal elastase-1 in detection of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;16:1220–8.e4.
Kataoka K, Yamane Y, Kato M, et al. Diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis using noninvasive tests of exocrine pancreatic function: comparison to duodenal intubation tests. Pancreas. 1997;15:409–15.
Otsuki M, Nishimori I, Hayakawa T, et al. Hereditary pancreatitis: clinical characteristics and diagnostic criteria in Japan. Pancreas. 2004;28:200–6.
Aoun E, Chang CC, Greer JB, Papachristou GI, Barmada MM, Whitcomb DC. Pathways to injury in CP: decoding the role of the high-risk SPINK1 N34S haplotype using meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e2003.
Tang XY, Zou WB, Yu FF, et al. Meta-analysis of the impact of the SPINK1 c.194 + 2T > C variant in chronic pancreatitis. Dig Liver Dis. 2020;52:143–8.
Masamune A, Kikuta K, Hamada S, et al. Nationwide survey of hereditary pancreatitis in Japan. J Gastroenterol. 2018;53:152–60.
Masamune A, Kotani H, Sörgel FL, et al. Variants that affect function of calcium channel TRPV6 are associated with early-onset chronic pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 2020;158:1626–41.e8.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the doctors who replied to the questionnaires.
Collaborators: Shin Miura , Tetsuya Takikawa , Seiji Hongo , Eriko Nakano , Tatsuhide Nabeshima , Ryotaro Matsumoto , Yu Tanaka , Masayuki Ueno , Tsuyoshi Mukai , Masataka Matsumoto , Yasushi Kudo , Shunjiro Azuma , Kosuke Okuwaki , Satoshi Yamamoto , Kazuo Inui , Kasen Kobashigawa , Jun Unno , Nao Fujimori , Katsuya Kitamura , H iroyuki Miyakawa , Kuniyuki Takahashi , Tsukasa Ikeura , Kazuichi Okazaki , Mamoru Takenaka , Mitsuharu Fukasawa , Hiroyuki Funayama , Akira Mitoro , Tadayuki Takagi , Masanari Sekine , Kanetoshi Suwa , Junichi Sakagami , Masaharu Ishida , Masayuki Ohtsuka , S hingo Kagawa , Takashi Muraki , Takayuki Watanabe , Takashi Watanabe , Katsunori Yamamoto , T omohiro Masaka , Masatsugu Nagahama , Ai Sato , Yukio Aruga , Yousuke Nakai , Eisuke Iwasaki , T akao Itoi , Yuki Kawaji , Masayuki Kitano , Kazuhiro Mizukami , Susumu Iwasaki , Masashi Mori , Naoya Kaneko , Yuzo Kodama , Hiroko Sato , Naoki Yoshida , Katsuko Hatayama , Takashi Kobayashi , Atsuyuki Hirano , Miyuki Kaino , Toshio Fujisawa , Tomoyuki Ushijima , Mitsuru Chiba , K yoko Shimizu , Hirotaka Ota , Masao Toki , Takao Nishikawa , Yu Yoshida , Kei Tanaka , Kota Uetsuki , Daisuke Motoya , Shinichiro Muro , Hiroyuki Watanabe , Yoshiki Imamura , Tetsuya Ishizawa , Terumi Kamisawa , M io Tsuruoka , Kazunao Hayashi , Shuji Terai , K unio Iwatsuka , Keisuke Iwata , Motoyuki Yoshida , T omofumi Takagi , Manabu Goto , Noriko Oza , Y asuhito Takeda , Hideki Hagiwara , Toshihiro Tadano , Toshitaka Sakai , Kimi Sumimoto , Nauro Nishimura , Atsushi Irisawa , Masaki Kuwatani , Nakao Shirahata , Masahiro Satoh , Tomoaki Fujikawa , Yusuke Iizawa , Noriko Watanabe , H iroshi Ishiguro , Naoya Sawada , Kazuhiro Katada , Hiromu Kondo , Ichiro Sakakihara , J unji Nishida , Tetsuo Tamura , Naohiro Dairaku , Hidehiro Kamezaki , Hiroyuki Okano , Shuji Suzuki , Tomoyoshi Okamoto , Yasuhiro Matsugu , Mahiro Imamura , Mitsuyoshi Honjo , Gen Sugiyama , Hajime Ohta , Syunichi Higashide , Shuji Ishii , Tatsuya Hoshi , Yasuhiko Takagi , Akihiko Satoh , Naohisa Yamaji , Nauro Nishimura , Masayuki Shibasaki , Hiroyuki Tamura , Takuji Iwashita , Masayo Motoya , Yuki Tanisaka , Shomei Ryozawa , H ajime Takatori , Nanae Tsuruoka , S hinichi Hashimoto , Noriaki Suzuki , Yuichirou Sato , H ironao Tamai , Kazuo Hara , K iyoshi Ashida , T omoyuki Yokota , Tsuyotoshi Tsuji , Makoto Abue , Hiroaki Tomaki , Masanori Fukunishi , Hideaki Koga , Yusuke Takehara , H iroshi Kawamura , Naoto Shimokawahara , Naoya Otsu , Yasutoshi Kimura , Keinosuke Ishido , Yasuhide Kofunato , Masahiro Shiihara , T akanori Sakaguchi , Toshihiko Masui , Hidetoshi Eguchi , Kazuhiro Suzumura , Takao Ide , Masafumi Inomata , Kosei Maemura , Hajime Iizawa , A kio Nakajima , Shiro Uyama , Shigehiro Shiozaki , Sachio Yokoyama , T oshiki Wakabayashi , Takayuki Furuuchi , Toshifumi Gushima , S huichi Satoh , Takeshi Shioya , Kazunori Nakazawa , Yoshimitsu Takahashi , Nobuhiko Fukuba , Saburo Matsubara .
Funding
This work was supported in part by the Japan Pancreas Society, and Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Masamune A received a lecture fee from Mylan EPD.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
535_2020_1704_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Supplementary file1 Supplementary Fig. 1. Schematic flowchart of the process for CP diagnosis. Definite CP is diagnosed by the presence of definite findings in items ① or ② or the presence of probable findings in ① or ② together with more than two items among ③ ~ ⑤. A diagnosis of early CP can be made if a patient does not satisfy a diagnosis of definite or probable CP but has at least three of five (③ ~ ⑦) clinical signs and imaging findings of early CP. If imaging findings of early CP were absent, a diagnosis of possible CP could be made after ruling out other diseases. CP, chronic pancreatitis; ERCP, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; EUS, endoscopic ultrasonography; MRCP, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Supplementary Fig. 2. Trend of the estimated number of patients with CP in Japan. The estimated numbers of patients with CP in this and previous (references #4–8) surveys are shown. Supplementary Fig. 3. Distribution of age at disease onset in patients with CP according to sex. Supplementary Fig. 4. Age distribution of patients with early CP according to sex. (PDF 71 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Masamune, A., Kikuta, K., Kume, K. et al. Nationwide epidemiological survey of chronic pancreatitis in Japan: introduction and validation of the new Japanese diagnostic criteria 2019. J Gastroenterol 55, 1062–1071 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-020-01704-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-020-01704-9