Abstract
This study sought to characterize the differences between the 3D-printed and decellularized tracheal grafts, providing the basis for the synthesis of the more reasonable and effective tissue-engineered trachea. We compared the biomechanical properties and biocompatibility of the 3D-printed tracheal graft and decellularized tracheal graft in vitro and evaluated the biocompatibility, immune rejection and inflammation of the two materials through in vivo implantation experiments. Compared with the decellularized tracheal graft, the 3D-printed tracheal graft was associated with obviously higher biomechanical properties. The results demonstrated enhanced growth of BMSCs in the decellularized tracheal graft compared to the 3D-printed one when co-culture with two tracheal graft groups. Moreover, the CCK-8 assay demonstrated significant cell proliferation on the decellularized tracheal graft. Serum IgG and IgM measured in vivo by implantation testing indicated that the 3D-Printed tracheal graft exhibited the most significant inflammatory response. HE staining indicated that the inflammatory response in the 3D-printed tracheal graft consisted mainly of eosinophils, while little inflammatory cell infiltrates were observed in the decellularized tracheal graft. CD68 immunohistochemical analysis indicated that the infiltration of macrophages was not significant in both tracheal grafts. Our findings suggest that the biomechanical properties of the 3D-printed tracheal grafts are better than the decellularized tracheal grafts. Nonetheless, the decellularized tracheal graft exhibited better biocompatibility than the 3D-printed tracheal graft.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
End-to-end anastomosis after resection of the diseased tracheal segment is generally considered the current gold standard for tracheal reconstruction [1,2,3,4]. However, it is only indicated when the diseased trachea does not exceed one-half the length of the whole trachea in adults or one-third in children [5]. When the diseased trachea exceeds the maximum length, tracheal reconstruction is difficult since it is not a simple cylindrical ventilation tube but a sophisticated multi-layer structure [6]. The trachea contains 15–20 C-shaped cartilage rings. The inner surface of the trachea is covered with ciliated epithelium, and the outer surface contains connective tissues such as smooth muscle and blood vessels. The tracheal cartilage importantly maintains the cylindrical shape of the trachea to prevent the trachea from collapsing, while the cilia in the respiratory epithelium on the inner surface of the trachea play an important role in cleaning the trachea. The connective tissue around the tracheal cartilage ensures the mechanical movement of the trachea, involving contraction and expansion [7, 8]. Accordingly, it is extremely challenging to completely reconstruct such a complex multi-layer structure and simulate its function. However, the tissue-engineered trachea has brought increased hope for tracheal reconstruction [9]. It effectively links seed cells, substrate and cytokines to repair related tissue and reconstruct organs [10]. As the main framework of the tissue-engineered trachea and the soil for seed cell growth, the scaffold material is the basis for successfully synthesizing tissue-engineered tracheas [11, 12]. Primary allogeneic tracheal matrix materials and synthetic materials have been widely used for tissue-engineered tracheal scaffolds [13, 14].
As a bioabsorbable polymer, polycaprolactone (PCL) has a low melting point (60 ℃) and good thermoplasticity; accordingly, it is easy to process and mold. Importantly, PCL can be naturally degraded in vivo and metabolized in vitro at a suitable rate[15]. In addition, due to its good biomechanical properties, PCL has been approved by FDA in the United States for biomedicine and tissue engineering [16]. Through experiments, our research group screened out that the 3D-Printed PCL scaffold with a pore size of 200 µm is most beneficial to cell adhesion and proliferation [17]. Hydrolysis, amination and nano-material modification were used to improve the cytotropism of the 3D-printed tracheal scaffold and enhance its adhesion to cells. This study aimed to compare the mechanical properties and biocompatibility of two kinds of tissue-engineered tracheal matrix materials to provide a basis for constructing a more effective and reasonable tissue-engineered tracheal.
Materials and methods
All the experiments were carried out based on the Guide for the Care and Use of animals, issued by the People’s Republic of China government in 2006. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Yancheng First People’s Hospital.
Tracheal acquisition
Tracheas were acquired from ten female 6 months adults New Zealand white rabbits (2.5–3.0 kg) using standard surgical procedures. The entire trachea was exposed via a mid-section cervical incision. Next, the sternothyroid muscles were split, the trachea was resected from the larynx to the carina, which was stored in cold PBS with 1% antibiotic and antimycotic solution (AA, Sangon, Shanghai, China).
Preparation of the decellularized trachea graft
Decellularized rabbit tracheal grafts were obtained by a detergent-enzymatic method. The native trachea was placed in distilled water at 4 °C for 48 h and then incubated with 4% sodium deoxycholate solution (Sigma, USA) for 4 h at 37 °C with a 40 r/min continuous vibration. Subsequently, the native trachea was incubated with 2000 kU/L Dnase-I (Sigma, USA), 1 moL/L NaCl solution at 23 °C for 3 h with a 40 r/min continuous shaking, washed with PBS for 10 min and finally placed in PBS solution containing 1% penicillin, streptomycin and amphotericin B (Sangon, Shanghai, China) overnight. After incubation and rinsing were repeated for seven times, the decellularized trachea was obtained.
Preparation of the 3D-printed tracheal graft
The bio-printer (UN-3DBI-I01) was bought from the Qingdao Unique Products Factory. The 3D-printed tracheal graft was synthesized using PCL (Daixun Trading Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, CAS code: 24980-41-4, molecular weight: 114.142), which was first melted at 90 °C and was extruded out of the nozzle (Fig. 1e, Youni Technology Co., Ltd., Qingdao) to print on the rotating shaft (Fig. 1f) at 5 mm/s (Fig. 1a). The bottom layer of the material was deposited on the platform (Fig. 1b). Once the first layer of material was deposited, another layer was then delivered on top of the previous one from the opposite direction according to the predefined specifications to form a porous shape (Fig. 1c). The process was repeated six times until an ideal tracheal graft was obtained (Fig. 1d). The aperture of the tracheal graft was adjusted by changing the speed of the rotation axis and print head. At last, the graft was immersed in a nano-silica solution (Chemical Engineering College of Yangzhou University) with a concentration of 10% overnight. After five days of condensation, a nano-silica-modified 3D-printed graft was obtained. The 3D-printed tracheal graft thickness was 1 mm, with an inner diameter 6 mm. The interstrand distance was 0.3 mm, and the pore diameter was 200 nm.
Biomechanical testing of the tracheal graft
The length, diameter, thickness and other morphological data of tracheal grafts in the native tracheal graft group, decellularized tracheal graft group and 3D-printed tracheal graft group were detected based on vernier calipers. A Instron 3367 mechanical testing device (Instron, MU, USA) was applied to examine the sample mechanical properties. The tensile test was performed at a successive rate of 1 mm/s rate with an initial load of 1 N. Similarly, the luminal compression experiment was conducted at a 10 mm/s velocity and an initial load of 0.1 N. Under the condition of the lumen was compressed to half its diameter, the experiment was terminated and the indicators were recorded.
SEM micrographs of tracheal grafts
The three tracheal grafts (the native tracheal graft group, decellularized tracheal graft group and 3D-printed tracheal graft group) were coated with gold/palladium using a sputter coater for 20 min. Finally, the morphology of the grafts was observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM; Hitachi, Japan). Dehydration was achieved by placing the tissue in graded ethanol (70%, 80%, 90%, 95% and 100%).
Isolation and culture of mesenchymal stem cells
The BMSCs were isolated from the tibial plateau of 2-months-old female white rabbits (1.5–2.0 kg) and cultured using whole bone marrow adherent culture under aseptic conditions. The rabbit was anesthetized by an intramuscular injection of 0.2 ml/Kg xylazine hydrochloride. Sterile bone marrow puncture needles (Baimusi Precision Technology Co., Ltd. Shenzhen, China) were used to puncture the left and right tibial plateaus, then 2 ml of bone marrow was extracted with a 5 ml syringe containing heparin. The mixture was transferred to a 15 ml centrifuge tube (Corning, NY, USA) on a clean bench. The mixture was centrifuged at 1000 r/min for 5 min (Thermo Fisher, Germany), and the supernatant was discarded. Pellets were washed with PBS. Cells were re-suspended with DEME-F12 medium (Hyclone, USA) with 10% FBS ( Clark, USA). The cell suspension was then transferred to a petri dish and cultured in a 5% CO2 incubator (RS232, Thermo Fisher) at 37 °C. The medium was replaced each 48 h, and non-adherent cells were removed. When cells in the culture dish reached 80% confluence, the medium was discarded and washed with PBS twice. Subsequently, cells were re-suspended by 2.5 g/L trypsin (Gibco, NY, USA) at 1 ml. The experiment was repeated to obtain the fourth generation of BMSCs. The fourth-generation BMSCs, which exhibited excellent growth, were used for subsequent experiments.
In vitro biocompatibility testing
Cellular morphology
The experiment includes the following groups: blank control group, native tracheal graft group, decellularized tracheal graft group and 3D-printed tracheal graft group. The tested materials were trimmed to square samples of dimension 1 × 1 cm in a sterile environment and placed into the cell culture plate. 1 ml of the fourth generation of BMSCs cell suspensions (3 × 105 cells/ml) and 1 ml of the BMSCs medium were then added. In addition, in each group, the experiments were repeated three times in parallel. All cell were cultured under the condition of 5% CO2 and 37 °C. Finally, cellular morphology on a different part of materials was examined by inverted microscopy (CKX41SF, Olympus).
Proliferation index of the cells
CCK-8 method was applied to evaluate the BMSCs proliferation performance. The tested materials were trimmed to obtain square samples of dimension 0.5 × 0.5 cm, immersed in 75% ethanol for 15 min, then treated for 12 h at a distance of 50 cm from the ultraviolet lamp (65w). Ultimately, the materials were put into 10 ml of DMEM-F12 with 10% FBS. The mixture was shaken at 37 °C for 24 h to obtain a steeping medium for the following experiment. The fourth-generation BMSCs were re-suspended in the BMSCs medium and seeded with a density of 3 × 104 cells/ml in a 96-well plate and 100 μL of each well. The culture condition is 5% CO2 and 37 °C. After 1 day, the BMSCs medium was replaced by the steeping medium. The CCK-8 assay was analysed on days 1, 3, 5, 7. The absorbance value was detected at a wavelength of 450 nm using a reader (Epoch, BioTek, Vermont, USA). The OD450 value which indirectly reflected active cells number was attained after subtracting the absorbance value of the blank control group.
In vivo experiment: subcutaneous implantation
For in vivo experiments, subjects were classified into three groups: native, decellularized and 3D-printed tracheal graft groups. Fifteen female adults white rabbits (2.5–3.0 kg, 6 months) were obtained from the Medical College of Yangzhou University.
Surgical procedure
The experimental animals were anesthetized with Xylazine (0.2 ml/Kg intramuscularly) until the operation was completed. The back was shaved 5 cm around the incision and sterilized with 75% alcohol. The skin and superficial fascia were cut open, and the neck muscles were bluntly separated. Subsequently, the tracheal graft was embedded. Finally, the muscle, fascia were sutured layer by layer after ensuring no leakage or bleeding in the operating field. 50,000 U/Kg of penicillin was injected intramuscularly every day within one week. The rabbits were killed at 30 d after the operation, and the implanted tracheal grafts were obtained.
Dynamic analysis of serum immunoglobulin
On days 3, 7, 11, 15, 19, 23 and 27 after the operation, blood samples were collected from the marginal ear veins of the rabbits. ELISA kit (Rapidbio, USA) was used to estimate the dynamic changes in serum IgM and IgG in the rabbits. Hematological parameters (leukocytes, lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils) were analyzed by an automatic blood analyzer (Roche, USA).
Histological analysis
The samples were fixed with 10% neutral formaldehyde (Zhenxing Chemical Factory, China, pH 7.4) at 23 °C for 24 h and rinsed with distilled water, embedded in paraffin, and cut into 4 mm sections. The tissue sections in the three groups underwent H&E staining (Keygen, Shanghai, China) to assess the growth of tissues, including epithelial tissue, cilia, cartilage and muscle, in terms of kit instructions.
Immunohistochemical analysis
The density of macrophages in the tracheal grafts in each group was demonstrated by CD68 immunohistochemical analysis. The regeneration of ciliated and glandular epitheliums was observed. The tissue sections were deparaffinized and hydrated (the steps were the same as HE staining). Subsequently, the samples were incubated with anti-rabbit CD68 (Novus, USA) which was diluted with 1:200 at 4 °C for 12 h. The slides were then incubated with secondary antibodies for 30 min and washed via PBS throughly. Subsequently, staining with DAB was performed for 3 min. Finally, the sample was stained with hematoxylin for 8 min. The stained slides were dried and observed by microscope (Olympus).
Different regions of the tissue sections stained by immunohistochemistry were observed. The cross-section of the trachea was divided into extra-trachea (the area outside the cartilage ring), cartilage matrix and intraluminal regions (the area within the cartilage ring excluding the submucosa). The cell and tissue in the same area of every group were analyzed and compared.
Quantification of IL-2 and IFN-γ
Peripheral blood was obtained from the marginal ear vein on days 0 and 7 after BMSCs were co-cultured on tracheal grafts. The IL-2 and IFN-γ concentrations were analysized based on the ELISA method via Rabbit immunoassay kits.
Statistical analysis
All statistics were analyzed with SPSS 19.0 software,and the data were expressed as mean ± SD. Differences between groups were determined based on ANOVA followed by t tests. p < 0.05 was regarded as the statistically judgement standard.
Results
Morphological observation of tracheal grafts
The macroscopic and microscopic structures of the three tracheal graft groups are shown in Fig. 2. The length, lumen inner diameter, and thickness of each group were listed in Table 1. There was no obvious morphological difference among the three tracheal graft groups.
Biomechanical properties of tracheal grafts
The biomechanical properties of the 3D-printed tracheal graft were obviously higher compared to the native and decellularized tracheal grafts. As shown in Table 2, the tensile test results showed that the deformation of the 3D-printed tracheal graft was significantly smaller than that of the other two groups under the same tensile force, revealing that the 3D-printed tracheal graft had the good longitudinal tensile ability. Similarly, The compression test results showed that the maximum stress and elastic modulus of the 3D-printed tracheal graft were better than those of the other two groups when the lumen deformation was 50%, revealing that the 3D-printed tracheal graft had good lateral compression capacity to maintain the lumen shape.
The biocompatibility testing of cell-tracheal grafts in vitro
Culture and passage of BMSCs
The results showed that BMSCs grew in clusters with different shapes, mainly fusiform after 48 h (Fig. 3a). At 6 d, the BMSCs colony was formed and the cell morphology was mostly fusiform and polygonal (Fig. 3b). At 10 d, BMSCs reached 90% fusion (Fig. 3c). The proportion of flat cells in the 4th generation BMSCs were increased (Fig. 3d).
Cell morphology observation
After co-culturing for 7 d, the results showed that BMSCs in the three groups grew well and adhered to the tracheal grafts. There was no significant distinction in the morphology of BMSCs around three groups of tracheal grafts, and few suspended BMSCs were appeared in the 3D-printed tracheal graft group (Fig. 4). There was no significant distinction in the cell density of the three groups of tracheal grafts.
Results of the CCK-8 assay
The proliferation of cells co-cultured with tracheal grafts in all three groups was measured with a microplate reader (450 nm wavelength) on days 1, 3, 5, and 7. As shown in Fig. 5, In the beginning week, the cells attached to the material surface and proliferated rapidly, and the number increased approximately 5 times on the 5th day. For reasons of no subsequent passage, self aging and death, the cell number decreased at 7 days. However, the OD values for cells in the decellularized tracheal graft group were statistically higher compared to the other two groups on days 3 and 5 (p < 0.05).
Postoperative observation
All the recipient animals showed good general health conditions, weight gain and wound healing within 30 days after the operation (Fig. 6). After 30 days, the lumen of the native tracheal group collapsed. The structure was destroyed and wrapped to form cystic inclusions, with abundant pus accumulated in the cysts. In the decellularized tracheal group, the lumen collapsed and adhered to the recipient bed, which was difficult to peel off. That of the 3D-printed tracheal group was well maintained, wrapped by inflammatory tissue and easy to peel off.
Detection of immunoglobulin
As shown in Table 3 and Fig. 7, the IgM and IgG level of the three groups increased gradually, reached a peak on days 11 and 15, respectively, and then decreased gradually. The contents of IgM and IgG in the 3D-printed tracheal group were obviously higher than in the decellularized tracheal group after the operation (p < 0.05).
Detection of blood routine
As shown in Table 4, the white blood cells reached a peak about a week after the operation and then began to decline. The neutrophils number gradually reduced, while lymphocytes increased, and monocytes kept stable. In the native tracheal graft group, the white blood cells components were dominantly neutrophils in the 2 weeks after surgery, while in the 3D-printed tracheal group, the number of neutrophils was less than lymphocytes in 1 week after surgery. In the decellularized tracheal group, the number of white cell was fluctuated, while the total white cell level was obviously lower than that of the other two groups (p < 0.05).
Analysis of HE
There were significantly more inflammatory cell infiltrates in the native tracheal group, consisting mainly of monocytes and lymphocytes; the gland structures were not visible, while the cartilage tissue was destroyed to different degrees. For the 3D-printed tracheal group, eosinophil infiltration was the predominant manifestation, showing foreign body granuloma-associated inflammatory reaction and normal gland architecture. The least number of inflammatory cells were infiltrated in the decellularized tracheal group, chondrocytes were of normal morphology, and no calcification and rejection were found (Fig. 8).
Analysis of immunohistochemistry
30 d after the operation, the matrix of the native tracheal group was destroyed. The nucleus in the cartilage depression disappeared, the cell membrane was brown, and abundant CD68-positive macrophages were visible at the submucosa. The structure of the 3D-Printed trachea group remained intact, and CD68-positive macrophage infiltration was seen inside the lumen. Macrophage infiltration in the decellularized tracheal group was significantly less than in the other two groups (Fig. 9).
Serum IL-2 and IFN-γlevels
On day seven after transplantation, the levels of IL-2 in the native, decellularized and 3D-printed tracheal graft groups were 906.08 ± 26.64, 832.23 ± 13.96, 844.45 ± 16.53 ng/L, respectively. The levels of IFN-γ in the native, decellularized and 3D-printed tracheal graft groups were 118.29 ± 2.45, 80.58 ± 2.71, 83.55 ± 5.47 ng/L, respectively. The expression of IL-2 and IFN-γ in the native tracheal graft group was obviously higher (Fig. 10).
Discussion and conclusion
Extracellular matrix (ECM) is an important part of tissue engineering for it is very necessary for the survival of seed cells. It strongly influences seed cell adhesion, differentiation, and promotes tissue regeneration and reconstruction [18, 19]. At present, both acellular matrix-based and biosynthetic scaffold-based approaches have been widely used in tissue engineering tracheal research. Acellular matrix materials contain extracellular matrix components and do not elicit inflammatory responses [20, 21]. But the decellularization in vitro is limited to a certain extent by the long duration of the decellularization treatment cycle, many processing links, consumption of manpower, material resources, amd greater risk of contamination [22]. The 3D-Printed tracheal stent brings many advantages, including individualization, precision, synchronization between seed cells and scaffold materials and rapidity [23].
It has been established that the reconstructed airways should possess the appropriate form and robustness to maintain their shape [24]. If the shape cannot be maintained, collapse and stenosis may occur during the early postoperative period. In the present study, through the mechanical performance test, it was found that the 3D-Printed tracheal graft had significant advantages compared with the decellularized tracheal graft. However, the poor acellular biomechanical properties were thought to be related to the tracheal loss of soluble collagen.
It should be borne in mind that for a tissue-engineered tracheal graft material to be applied in clinical practice, it should support seed cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation. In this experiment, the outer wall of two tracheal grafts was seeded with BMSCs for co-culture in vitro, and the adhesion of cells were observed. Accordingly, our findings suggest that decellularized and modified 3D-Printed tracheal grafts can offer a good cell adhesion interface for cell proliferation. The relatively greater number of cells attached to the 3D-Printed tracheal graft surface was attributed to the suitable pore size of the material and increased number of attachment points available for adhesion on original hydrophobic material surface after modification. Results from co-culture in vitro and the CCK-8 assay suggested that the least cytotoxicity was observed in the decellularized tracheal graft group, which provided the most conducive environment for cell proliferation. Notwithstanding that 3D-Printed tracheal graft facilitates cell adhesion, cell growth, it is associated with a lower proliferation rate of BMSCs compared to the decellularized tracheal graft.
Biomaterials should not satisfy the functional requirements but also be biocompatible for long-term or short-term contact with organisms. In this study, serum IgG and IgM changes were monitored after the operation, and HE staining and immunohistochemical staining for macrophage-specific antigen CD68 were performed after obtaining the specimens. In addition, The IL-2 and IFN-γ concentrations were measured 7d after the operation. Our results showed that IgM peaked first, while IgG peaked after two weeks, consistent with the characteristics of these two immunoglobulins. IgG and IgM levels in the 3D-Printed tracheal group were obviously higher compared to that in other groups at 2 weeks. The results of the three groups were consistent at four weeks, indicating that the 3D-Printed tracheal group induced higher levels of stimulation than in the other two groups during the acute stage of inflammatory reaction. IL-2 and IFN-γ are mainly released by activated T lymphocytes, which are effective markers of rejection induced after transplantation [25]. The experimental results show that IL-2 and IFN-γ levels were increased in three groups. However, the expression of the two in the native tracheal graft group was higher compared to the two other groups. The production of IL-2 and IFN-γ is increased which indicates acute rejection during transplantation [26]. HE staining showed significant infiltration of mononuclear macrophages, lymphocytes and plasma cells in the native tracheal group, while a predominant infiltration of eosinophils was appeared in the 3D-Printed tracheal group, showing foreign body granulomatous inflammation. Given that the inflammatory reactions induced are completely different, the relationship between the antigen and the material’s surface should be considered. Since there is no antigen on the surface of the 3D-Printed tracheal scaffold, the antigen presentation process cannot occur, leading to fibrous encapsulation and foreign body granuloma. In addition, eosinophil infiltration may occur, resulting from autoimmune reactions caused by foreign body stimulation. To sum up, by analyzing the biological performance of decellularized tracheal scaffold and 3D-printed tracheal scaffold in vitro and in vivo in this experiment, we confirmed that the 3D-printed tracheal scaffold exhibited relatively better biomechanical properties. However, the decellularized trachea exhibited low immunogenicity, adequate cell proliferation and good biocompatibility. Indeed, more studies are required to improve our knowledge on the advantages of these two scaffold materials to provide the basis for constructing hybrid tissue-engineered tracheas with multi-layer structures.
Data availability
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
References
Delaere P, Raemdonck DV (2016) Tracheal replacement. J Thorac Dis 8:S186–S196
Zhong Y, Yang W, Pan ZY et al (2019) In vivo transplantation of stem cells with a genipin linked scaffold for tracheal construction. J Biomater Appl 34:47–60
Etienne H, Fabre D, Caro AG et al (2018) Tracheal replacement. Eur Respir J 51:1702211
Shin YS, Choi JW, Park JK et al (2015) Tissue-engineered tracheal reconstruction using mesenchymal stem cells seeded on a porcine cartilage powder scaffold. Ann Biomed Eng 43:1003–1013
Den Hondt M, Vranckx JJ (2017) Reconstruction of defects of the trachea. J Mater Sci Mater Med 28:24
Perez D, Trabelsi O, Mena A et al (2010) Patient-specific models of human trachea to predict mechanical consequences of endoprosthesis implantation. Philos Trans A Math phys Eng Sci 368:2881–2896
Ji S, Bkh B, Sang J et al (2020) Tranilast-loaded tubular scaffold and surgical suture for suppression of stenosis after tracheal prosthesis transplantation. J Ind Eng Chem 82:81–88
Udelsman B, Mathisen DJ, Ott HC (2018) A reassessment of tracheal substitutes—a systematic review. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 7:175–182
Hamilton N, Bullock AJ, MacNeil S et al (2014) Tissue engineering airway mucosa: a systematic review. Laryngoscope 124:961–968
Dhasmana A, Singh A, Rawal S (2020) Biomedical grafts for tracheal tissue repairing and regeneration “Tracheal tissue engineering: an overview.” J Tissue Eng Regen Med 14:653–672
Hong P, Michael B, Elise GM et al (2018) Efficient decellularization of rabbit trachea to generate a tissue engineering scaffold biomatrix. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 112:67–74
Kojima K, Vacanti CA (2014) Tissue engineering in the trachea. Anat Rec 219:44–50
Mahoney C, Conklin D, Waterman J et al (2016) Electrospun nanofibers of poly(ε-caprolactone)/depolymerized chitosan for respiratory tissue engineering applications. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 27:611–625
Lange P, Shah H, Birchall M et al (2017) Characterization of a biologically derived rabbit tracheal scaffold. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomate 105:2126–2135
Tsao CK, Ko CY, Yang SR et al (2014) An ectopic approach for engineering a vascularized tracheal substitute. Biomaterials 35:1163–1175
Ribeiro J, Oliveira S, Alves J et al (2017) Structural monitoring and modeling of the mechanical deformation of three-dimensional printed poly (ε-caprolactone) scaffolds. Biofabrication 9:025015
Pan S, Zhong Y, Shan YB, Shi HC et al (2019) Selection of the optimum 3D-printed pore and the surface modification techniques for tissue engineering tracheal scaffold in vivo reconstruction. J Biomed Mater Res A 107:360–370
Zang M, Zhang Q, Chang EI et al (2012) Decellularized tracheal matrix scaffold for tissue engineering. Plast Reconstr Surg 130:532–540
Kalathur M, Baiguera S, Macchiarini P (2010) Translating tissueengineered tracheal replacement from bench to bedside. Cell Mol Life Sci 67:4185–4196
Luo X, Liu Y, Zhang Z et al (2013) Long-term functional reconstruction of segmental tracheal defect by pedicled tissue-engineered trachea in rabbits. Biomaterials 34:3336–3344
Petrosyan A, da Sacco S, Tripuraneni N et al (2017) A step towards clinical application of acellular matrix: a clue from macrophage polarization. Matrix Biol 57–58:334–346
Wang ZH, Wu C, Wu SH, Shi HC (2020) Application and characteristics of decellularization technology in tissue engineered trachea. Chin J Tissue Eng 24:5695–5700
Zheng KF, Liu YJ, Zhao JB et al (2020) Application of 3D printed tracheal stents in the repair of long tracheal defects. Chin J Thorac Surg 7:191–196
Chang JW, Park SA, Park JK et al (2014) Tissue-engineered tracheal reconstruction using three-dimensionally printed artificial tracheal graft: preliminary report. Artif Organs 38:95–105
Lu LJ, Sun JB, Liu ZG et al (2009) Immune responses following mouse peripheral nerve xenotransplantation in rats. J Biomed Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/412598
Fox IK, Jaramillo A, Hunter DA et al (2005) Prolonged cold-preservation of nerve allografts. Muscle Nerve 31:59–69
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Medical Research Project of Jiangsu Commission of Health (Z2020008); Talent Support Project of Jiangsu Association for Science and Technology (2020); Program of Medical Science and Technology in Yancheng (YK2019001). The authors would like to thank Qingdao Unique Products Develop Co., Ltd for the fabrication of the 3D printed tracheal graft.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Y., Li, J., Qian, J. et al. Comparison of the biological properties between 3D-printed and decellularized tracheal grafts. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 46, 957–967 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-023-02867-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-023-02867-4