Introduction

Species in the genus Sarcocystis have an obligate two-host life cycle, with sexual development in small intestine of the definitive host and asexual development in the intermediate host, usually herbivores (Dubey et al. 2016). Canids are known definitive hosts for numerous species of Sarcocystis that form sarcocysts in domestic and wild herbivores. Occasionally, muscular sarcocysts have been reported in canids, including dogs, coyotes, wolves, and foxes. The clinical and biologic significance of sarcocysts in canids are unknown, except severe myositis was reported in four dogs in association with two Sarcocystis species (Dubey et al. 2015). Recently, muscular sarcocysts were detected in 19 of 36 (52.8%) Pampas foxes (Lycalopex gymnocercus) from Argentina (Scioscia et al. 2017). The life cycle of species of Sarcocystis that form sarcocysts in canid muscle are unknown. It remains uncertain whether canids are aberrant hosts for sarcocysts or if there is a regular cycle entailing transmission through canid muscles. If so, predation or scavenging of canid carcasses by a carnivore would be suspected as necessary.

Sarcocysts were reported in two Arctic foxes from Norway and named Sarcocystis arctica based on light microscopic examination and molecular characterization of frozen sarcocysts; ultrastructure of sarcocysts was not reported (Gjerde and Schulze 2014). Ultrastructure of the sarcocyst wall is an important taxonomic criterion (Dubey et al. 2016). In the present study, we report ultrastructure of fresh S. arctica-like sarcocysts from the Arctic fox (Vulpes lagopus) from Alaska, USA, and provide molecular data. Additionally, we report high prevalence of this parasite indicating that Arctic fox is a regular intermediate hosts for this species.

Material and methods

Sample collection

Samples of tongue were collected from 56 foxes between May and June 2016 on the Arctic Coastal Plain near Barrow, Alaska (71.29° N, 156.79° W). All foxes were shot or trapped (ADFG permit 16–121) as part of a predator control program designated under the US Fish and Wildlife Service Steller’s Eider (Polysticta stelleri) recovery plan using methods in accordance with guidelines from the American Veterinary Medical Association and the American Society of Mammalogists. The tongues were removed from carcasses using a scalpel, refrigerated, and shipped on ice to the US Department of Agriculture Animal Parasitic Diseases Laboratory in Beltsville, MD within 4 days.

Muscle squashes

Each tongue sample was examined for the presence of Sarcocystis sarcocysts by squeezing fresh pieces of muscle between the slide and coverslip.

Pepsin digestion

Most of the remaining tongue samples (10 g) were homogenized in saline and incubated in acid pepsin solution for 1 h at 37 °C in a water bath, as described previously (Dubey 2010). After centrifugation at 1180g for 10 min, the supernatant was discarded, and the sediment was suspended in 5 ml of saline; a drop (0.1 ml) was spread on a slide, covered with a 22 × 22 mm coverslip, and examined microscopically for bradyzoite presence at ×200–400 magnification. Additionally, bradyzoites were smeared on glass slides, air dried, and stained with Giemsa.

Measurements

Measurements were made digitally using Olympus DP73 camera.

Histological examination

One piece from the 56 tongues was fixed in 10% buffered formalin. After fixing, several pieces of tongue were cut to fit a 3 × 2 cm paraffin block and were processed for histology. Sections were cut 5 μm thick and examined microscopically after staining with hematoxylin and eosin (HE). All sarcocysts in a block were counted.

Transmission electron microscopic examination

Sarcocysts from two, heavily infected tongues were fixed in glutaraldehyde and processed for transmission electron microscopy (TEM) as described previously (Trupkiewicz et al. 2016).

Molecular characterization

From four positive animals, five morphologically similar sarcocysts were excised and individually placed in 20 μl of saline (0.85%) in 1.5 ml centrifuge tubes, which were kept frozen at −20 °C until DNA isolation.

DNA was extracted from two sarcocysts from two foxes using DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA, USA), according to manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted DNA was characterized by PCR amplification and sequencing of 18S, 28S, and ITS1 of the ribosomal DNA in the nuclear genome and cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1gene (cox1) from the mitochondrial genome using previously published primers (Gjerde 2013, 2014; Gjerde and Josefsen 2015). Each locus was amplified independently using 3 μl template, 1 μl of forward and reverse primers (20 mM final concentration), 12.5 μl of Taq PCR Master Mix (Qiagen, USA) and 8.5 μl of distilled water. Following an initial denaturation step of 5 min at 95 °C, 40 cycles of PCR were conducted for all reactions with the following cycling conditions (95 °C for 45 s, 56.5 °C for 45 s, and 72 °C for 1 min), ending with 10 min at 72 °C for final extension.

After amplification, PCR products were visualized on 2.5% agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide, and single PCR amplicons were excised and purified using QIAquick Gel Extraction Kits (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. For sequencing the DNA, 1 μl of each purified amplicon was sequenced using the original amplification primers and BigDye Terminator v3.1 chemistry according to manufacturer’s instructions (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Sequencing products were purified by EdgeBio Performa DTR Gel Filtration Cartridges (Cat# 42453) and sequenced on an ABI 3730 Sequencer. Sequences were aligned in Geneious R9 using the MUSCLE plug-in and neighbor-joining trees were built with 1000 bootstraps. Similarities between newly generated sequences were compared to those deposited in the NCBI database. All sequences derived from Alaskan Arctic fox have been deposited in GenBank.

Ethics

All research was performed following the approved protocols by the institutions involved.

Results

Light microscopy

In unstained tongue squashes, four (7.1%) foxes were positive and sarcocysts were slender with an average size of 1960 μm (1105–4080, n = 31) long and 202 μm (134–288) wide. Numerous bradyzoites were detected microscopically in 13 (23.2%) tongue pepsin digest (Fig. 1a). These bradyzoites measured 8.1 × 2.1 (6.9–9.5 × 1.4–2.7, n = 51) μm in size. The sarcocyst wall appeared to have small protrusions when viewed at ×1000 magnification of unstained squashes (Fig. 1b).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Sarcocystis arctica-like sarcocysts and bradyzoites from the tongue of the Alaska Arctic foxes. a Bradyzoites in pepsin digest. Smear. Giemsa stain. b Sarcocyst. Unstained Note septa (se) and villar protrusions (arrowheads) on the cyst wall. c Longitudinal section of sarcocyst. Hematoxylin and eosin stain. Note empty space (arrow) in the interior of the sarcocyst. d Part of cross section of sarcocyst showing indistict protrusions and numerous bradyzoites. Note cyst wall (cw) with indistinct protrusions (arrowheads) into the host cell (hc), and numerous bradyzoites (br).

Sarcocysts were found in HE-stained sections in nine (16.0%) foxes (Fig. 1c). The number of sarcocysts per block was low (<10) in six foxes. However, numerous sarcocysts were seen in three foxes with up to 107 sarcocysts in one fox. All sarcocysts were mature and they were up to 1758 μm long and 145 μm wide (Fig. 1c, d). The sarcocysts were septate and centers of some of them were empty or contained degenerated parasites (Fig. 1c). At ×400 magnification, sarcocyst wall appeared to be smooth but few irregular protrusions were visible in some sarcocysts at ×1000 magnification; the sarcocyst wall was up to 1.5 μm thick (Fig. 1d). Except for focal infiltrations of mononuclear cells, inflammatory responses were not seen even in heavily infected foxes. There was no evidence of sarcocyst degeneration.

Transmission electron microscopy

Five sarcocysts (4 from 1 and 1 from another fox) were studied ultrastructurally. All five sarcocysts were structurally similar. The parasitophorous vacuolar membrane (pvm) was folded into villar protrusions (vp) and lined by a 100 nm thick electron dense layer. The pvm was wavy and the electron dense layer (edl) was thinned out or absent at different levels of the vp (Figs. 2, 3, and 4). The vp were up to 3.0 μm long and 0.5 μm wide, pleomorphic, some appeared anastomosing and they lacked microtubules (Figs. 3 and 4). The ground substance (gs) was smooth, without any microtubules or granules, and up to 2.5 μm thick. The total thickness of the wall including vp and the gs was up to 4.0 μm. All sarcocysts were mature and contained metrocytes and bradyzoites (Figs. 2, 3, 5, and 6).

Fig. 2
figure 2

TEM micrographs of a sarcocyst from the tongue of the Alaskan Arctic fox. Note, pleomorphic villar protrusions (vp), thick ground substance (gs), with prominent septa (se), metrocytes (me), and bradyzoites (br).

Fig. 3
figure 3

TEM of sarcocyst #1 from the Alaskan Arctic fox. Note pleomorhic, anastomosing (arrows) villar protrusions (vp), metrocytes (me), and ground substance layer (gs) justapoxed with metrocyte pellicle (mep)

Fig. 4
figure 4

TEM of sarcocyst #1 from the Alaskan Arctic fox Note host cell (hc), microtubules (mt), and wavy parasitophorous vacuolar membrane (pvm) lined with electron dense layer (edl) that is thinned out or interrupted at places (double arrowheads) at different levels of the vp and thick ground substance layer (gs) without microtubules but with finer granular material. A few electron dense granules were present in the gs (arrowheads). The gs is juxtaposed with bradyzoite (br).

Fig. 5
figure 5

TEM of sarcocyst #1 from the Alaskan Arctic fox. Note a group of metrocytes (me) containing several amylopectin granules (arrows), prominent nucleus (nu), and no micronemes nor rhoptries. Also note, host cell (hc), ground substance layer (gs), and villar protrusions (vp)

Fig. 6
figure 6

TEM of bradyzoites in sarcocyst #1 from the Alaskan Arctic fox. Sections of several bradyzoites. Note a conoid (co), many amylopectin granules (am), numerous micronemes (mn), an elongated nucleus (nu), and an elongated mitochondrion (mt). There are at least two rhoptries (rh1, rh2) in each bradyzoite with a narrow neck and large blind ends (arrows).

The metrocytes were arranged or grouped together (Fig. 5). Metrocytes contained few organelles except that there were several amylopectin (am) granules, which is an unusual finding. In sections examined, metrocytes lacked rhoptries and micromes (Fig. 5). In TEM sections, bradyzoites were curved and difficult to measure. They contained organelles typical of Sarcocystis bradyzoites, including conoid, micronemes, rhoptries, mitochondrion, nucleus, and amylopectin granules (Fig. 6). There were numerous micronemes, arranged haphazardly in the conoidal third of the bradyzoite (Fig. 6). There were at least two rhoptries with a large bulbous blind end. The nucleus was often elongated and located subterminally. The amylopectin granules were scattered in posterior two-third of the bradyzoite. The posterior end of the bradyzoite had a conical thickening (Fig. 6).

Molecular analyses

Sequences from the 18S rDNA, 28S rDNA, ITS-1, and cox1 loci were remarkably similar to previously published S. arctica sequences (Figs. 7 and 8). Both 18S rDNA sequences (1756 bp in length) were 100% identical to each other (KY947306; KY947307) as well as seven previously published S. arctica sequences derived from Alaskan wolves (KX022100, KX022101, KX022102) and Norwegian Arctic foxes (KF601301, KF601302, KF601303, KF601304). Each 28S sequence was identical to published S. arctica sequences, but the two differed by a single nucleotide (KY947308; KY947309). No other Sarcocystis species had fewer than 12 nucleotide differences at the 18S rDNA locus or 27 differences at the 28S rDNA locus. The ITS-1 had more intraspecific sequence variation with a maximum of five differences between any two sequences, as expected (Gjerde and Josefsen 2015). The ITS-1 sequence derived from one Arctic fox sampled here (KY947310; KY947311) was identical to Norwegian S. arctica sequences (KF601306, KF601307, KF601309, KF601310, and KF601311), while the sequence from the other fox was nearly identical (99.9% identical) to S. arctica from an Alaskan wolf (Canis lupus, KX022108). There was greater than 98% identity among all S. arctica sequences (Fig. 7). No other species of Sarcocystis could be reliably aligned at the ITS locus. Cox1 sequences amplified from two different Arctic foxes were identical to each other (KY947304; KY947305) as well as S. arctica from Alaskan wolf (KX022112; KX022113; KX022114; KX022115) (Calero-Bernal et al. 2016) and Norwegian Arctic fox (KF601319) (Gjerde and Schulze 2014). This shared 99.3% similarity with S. lutrae from Norwegian Eurasian otters (KF601326) (Gjerde and Josefsen 2015) and 98.9% similarity with S. turdusi (KT588518) (Prakas et al. unpublished). Our phylogenetic study denotes that S. arctica from Alaskan wolf (Calero-Bernal et al. 2016), S. arctica from Norwegian Arctic foxes (Gjerde and Schulze 2014) and Sarcocystis from Alaskan Arctic foxes (present study) are in the same clade. That conclusion is supported here as neighbor-joining 18S rDNA and cox1 trees show greater than 99% bootstrap support for a clade encompassing all S. arctica sequences, including the sequences derived from sarcocysts present in Arctic fox tongues presented here.

Fig. 7
figure 7

A neighbor-joining 18S ribosomal DNA gene tree shows strong support for interspecific differences among Sarcocystis species. From alignments of 1756 bp, a consensus tree was constructed from 1000 bootstrap replicates based on HKY genetic distances rooted by E. tenella. Sarcocystis arctica 18S rDNA sequences isolated from Alaskan Arctic foxes, Alaskan wolves, and Norwegian Arctic foxes were restricted to a single branch with 100% bootstrap support. The S. arctica branch falls within a clade with 100% bootstrap support which includes S. lutrae, S. turdusi, S. speeri, and S. rileyi. The remaining species agreed with previous analyses (Gjerde and Schulze 2014) and are shown for consistency with past analyses. Bootstrap values are only shown for those partitions that appeared in greater than 85% of replicates

Fig. 8
figure 8

The mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I (cox1) gene tree supports the inclusion of Alaskan Arctic fox sarcocysts in the species S. arctica. A neighbor-joining consensus tree was constructed from 1000 bootstrap replicates based on alignments of 917 bp and HKY genetic distances. The branch encompassing all S. arctica cox1 sequences and sequences from Alaskan Arctic fox sarcocysts had 99.3% bootstrap support. Similar to the 18S rDNA gene tree, S. arctica sequences were in a clade with S. lutrae, S. turdusi, S. speeri, and S. rileyi. At the cox 1 locus, the S. arctica clade was more closely related to Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii than other Sarcocystis species. The gene tree was rooted with cox1 sequence from Eimeria tenella

Discussion

Sarcocysts found in Arctic foxes from Alaska appeared similar to the S. arctica sarcocysts found in two Norwegian Arctic foxes (Gjerde and Schulze 2014). Sarcocysts from one Norwegian fox were previously described morphologically by light microscopy. They were up to 12 mm long in muscle squashes and had serrations on the sarcocyst wall (Gjerde and Schulze 2014). However, the serrations were not seen in HE-stained sections. Sarcocysts were not detected by light microscopy from the second fox. Sarcocysts were characterized molecularly from both foxes.

The tissues examined may contribute to minor differences seen (by light microscopy of sarcocysts) in our report and the previous one from Norway. Here, only tongues were available for examination whereas in the study from Norway, body muscles other than tongue were examined. The length of sarcocysts can vary according to the muscle parasitized; sarcocysts are smaller in size in the myocardium versus skeletal muscle (Dubey et al. 2016). Sarcocysts from the Norwegian Arctic foxes were not described ultrastructurally. We have now added the ultrastructural description of sarcocysts, including the sarcocyst wall, metrocytes, and bradyzoites. Ultrastructurally, the sarcocyst wall of sarcocyst from the Arctic fox most closely resembles “type 9c” sarcocyst wall of Dubey et al. (2016). Molecularly, the S. arctica sarcocysts in Arctic foxes from both continents appear similar. Comparing molecular characteristics, the regions 18S rRNA, 28S rRNA and cox1, which are normally more conserved, shared 100, 99.9, and 100% identity with S. arctica found in Alaskan wolf and 100, 99.9, and 99.3% identity with S. arctica sequences from Norwegian foxes. On the other hand, the ITS-1 locus, which is expected to have more variability, showed a split between the sequences with respect to their similarity to published sequences. One sequence was most similar to S. arctica from an Alaskan wolf while the other was identical to S. arctica ITS-1 from Norwegian foxes. In general, sarcocysts of S. arctica from Norway and USA are similar to S. arctica-like sarcocysts from the gray wolf from Alaska (Calero-Bernal et al. 2016) and S. caninum sarcocysts from dogs from USA (Dubey et al. 2015). The definitive host/hosts of these sarcocysts are unknown. Many species of carnivores, including birds, bears, and even foxes prey on foxes or scavenge fox carcasses. The molecular characteristics of S. arctica from Arctic foxes in Alaska reported here and from Norway by Gjerde and Schulze (2014) should help in the identification of Sarcocystis sporocysts of this species in carnivorous definitive host.

This is the first report of Sarcocystis infection in Alaskan Arctic fox.