Abstract
Crassostrea gasar is a bivalve mollusk of economic interest in the Amazon estuary, because it displays good zootechnical performance and nutritional value. However, there is still a gap in the literature regarding studies on basic biology, especially spermatogenesis at the ultrastructural level. This study aimed to describe for the first time the male gonad development. Gonad fragments were analyzed using light microscopy and transmission and scanning electron microscopy. The ultrastructural analysis of the gonadal tubule showed two distinct cell populations: support cells and the cells of the spermatogenic lineage. Regarding the ultrastructural aspects, support cells were characterized by an irregular shape, sparse electron-dense cytoplasm, and a large nucleus with condensed chromatin; and two types of spermatogonia were seen (A and B); spermatocytes I where it was possible to characterize four stages of prophase I, namely leptotene, zygotene, pachytene, diplotene; spermatocytes II showing a reduction in cytoplasmic and condensed chromatin. Spermatids were classified into three stages of development: early, middle, and late. Mature spermatozoa are of the primitive type and have a cone-shaped head with a discoidal acrosome, a midpiece formed by four mitochondria, and a long flagellum. This information can help establish phylogenetic relationships between species of the genus Crassostrea. In addition, these findings can support conservation biology by developing and implementing biotechnological approaches, such as cryopreservation, and contributing to commercial-scale cultivation in the Amazon region.
Graphical Abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Reproductive biology is essential to assess a population is dynamics and species perpetuation (Gosling 2015; Watanabe et al. 2020). The knowledge of the male gonadal structure and spermatogenesis of bivalves has been important for understanding the species reproductive biology and the mechanisms involved in sperm maturation (Healy et al. 2015; Gwo and Hsu 2020). Spermatogenesis is a cyclical process, that starts from germ cells to the production of mature gametes, which are released into the environment (Mylonas et al. 2016; Nuurai et al. 2016).
Recently, these morphological data on spermatogenesis have established different reproductive strategies (Viana et al. 2022) and a broad understanding of phylogenetic and systematic relationships (Varela et al. 2007; Melo et al. 2010). However, studies addressing morphological differences are scarce for native species such as Crassostrea gasar. These characteristics can help to understand the phylogenetic aspects and establishment of the species in a family.
The Ostreidae family has undergone a systematic review, which has seen a change in the name and clade of several species of economic importance (Liu et al. 2011; Salvi and Mariottini 2016; Kasmini and Batubara 2022). Thus, descriptive studies provide essential data regarding morphology, serving as a tool for taxonomy and phylogenetics. It is vital to keep databases up to date.
The oysters are dioecious, and have sexual reproduction with external fertilization, with no present sexual dimorphism (Christo and Absher 2006). According to Varela et al. (2007), there are three species of oysters on the Brazilian coast, Crassostrea rhizophorae, Crassostrea gasar, and Crassostrea gigas. In the northeast of the Brazilian state of Pará, the species C. gasar is dominant, because it is economically important for the Amazon region, generating employment and income. There are several studies in the literature on the cultivation of C. gasar (Paixão et al. 2013; Oliveira et al. 2018; Pantoja et al. 2020; Lameira Silva et al. 2020).
For decades, histological and ultrastructural techniques have been used as tools to characterize spermatogenesis in several species of oysters over, mainly of the genus Crassostrea, such as Crassostrea angulata (Sousa and Oliveira 1994), Crassostrea gigas (Bozzo et al. 1993; Franco et al. 2008; Kim et al. 2010b; Yurchenko et al. 2010), and Crassostrea virginica (Eckelbarger and Davis 1996; O’Beirn et al. 1996). However, these aspects are not described in Crassostrea gasar (Deshayes, 1830) (sin. Crassostrea tulipa (Lamarck, 1819), an important species marketed in Brazil, especially in the Amazon region. There are still gaps in the description of spermatogenesis of C. gasar. Thus, the aim of the present study was to describe the development of germ line and support cells, and to characterize the cell types of the germ line.
Materials and methods
Collection of specimens
We collected 30 specimens of C. gasar at 3 months of age according to the de Souza Sampaio et al. (2019) cultivated in Augusto Corrêa, Pará, Brazil in 2019 (0° 52′ 54" S and 46° 26′ 54" W), thereby considered adults. Subsequently, the specimens were transported to the laboratory and then anesthetized with ice according to the protocol of Pantoja et al. (2020) for the removal and processing of gonadal tissue, stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) solution for sexual identification of oysters.
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
The fragments of gonads from 30 animals’ males were fixed in Karnovsky’s solution (4% paraformaldehyde, 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4) for 24 h. After fixation, the fragments were washed in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4 and post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4 for 2 h. For TEM analysis, the fragments were dehydrated in an ascending acetone series and embedded in Epon 812. Ultra-thin sections were cut in a microtome and contrasted with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, followed by an examination in a JEOL (JEM -100CX II) electron microscope. For SEM analysis, a male gonad section and 500-µl aliquots of raw semen were fixed in Karnovsky’s solution, and then, a drop of the fixed semen sample was placed on a poly-l-lysine-coated coverslip. The samples were dehydrated in a graded ethanol series (30–100%) and critical-point dried using CO2 and mounted on stubs, coated with gold, and examined using a LEO 1430 SEM.
Morphometry and statistical analysis
For morphometry only, male gonad in the mature stage of C. gasar were evaluated, because this stage has the largest seminiferous tubules, following criteria previously established (Pantoja et al. 2020). A total of 10 specimens were analyzed, and for each specimen, the mean diameter of the 10 seminiferous tubules was measured. In each specimen, the mean diameter (n = 100) for each germ cell type (spermatogonia A and B, spermatocytes, spermatids, and spermatozoa) were analyzed. Only cells that contained a nucleus were measured, serial sections were cut, and the slides were evaluated under a photomicroscope with the software NIS-elements BR (4.00.07-bit), and measurements were made at 40× magnification. Each cell was overlaid with two dashed lines crossing at right angles in the middle of the cell, and the length of the segment of the line over that diameter of the cell was measured. The mean length of the two measurements was taken as the approximate diameter of the cell. The means were analyzed using a Student’s parametric test with (p < 0.05). All analyses were performed using the program Statistica 2.0.
Results
Gonadal morphology and cellular organization in males of C. gasar
Specimens of C. gasar (Fig. 1a) at this advanced stage of spermatogenesis showed gonadal tissue (Fig. 1b) with a diffuse whitish aspect, consisting of numerous gonadal tubules, located between the mantle and the digestive gland. Microscopically, the gonadal tubules are enclosed by a thin layer of connective tissue, surrounded by hemocoel (Fig. 1c).
The gonadal tubules presented two distinct cell populations, the support cells and the germ cells. The support cells or intragonadal somatic cells (ISC) (Fig. 1d) were characterized by an irregular shape, sparse electron-dense cytoplasm and a large nucleus with condensed chromatin and by being in close contact with the germ cells (Fig. 1c, d). Germ cells were represented by spermatogonia (A and B), primary spermatocytes (in four phases of meiosis), secondary spermatocytes, spermatids (early stage, middle stage, and late stage) and spermatozoa, which are organized in a stratified manner and presented specific characteristics throughout gonadal development.
Ultrastructure of male germ cells
The germinal epithelium comprised spermatogenic cells in different stages that were evidenced by the nuclear characteristics, chromatin condensation patterns, and cytoplasmic content. They have morphometry (pseudo-F = 1.23; p ≤ 0.05); a progressive and significant reduction was observed in the diameter of the nucleus of germ cells with statistic values, which occurred throughout spermatogenesis (Table 1).
The spermatogonia have a larger diameter of the cell nucleus and were classified into two types: type A (SgA) and type B (SgB) (Fig. 2a, b). SgA cells were found as individual cells directly attached to the wall of the gonadal tubule, and have electrolucent cytoplasm with several mitochondria and nucleus of large diameter (5.05 ± 0.1 μm), spherical shape, fine chromatins. Meanwhile, SgB cells were found in successive cell layers and had smaller cell nucleus diameter (4.51 ± 0.2 μm) compared to SgA, electron-dense cytoplasm with the presence of mitochondria and several round granulofibrillar dense bodies.
After successive mitotic divisions, SgB gives rise to primary spermatocytes (ScI) characterized by chromatin condensation (3.94 ± 0.2 μm). Based on the chromatin arrangement, it was possible to distinguish ScI in four phases of prophase I: leptotene (le), where there were reduced cytoplasm, condensed nuclear chromatin, and little evidence of nucleolus (Fig. 2c, e); Zygotene (zy) the nuclear envelope and long, thin filamentous chromatin; Pachytene (pa) characterized by bulky nucleus, thick chromatin filaments; Diplotene (dp) showing thick, irregular chromatin migrating to the nuclear membrane.
Secondary spermatocytes (ScII) were smaller than ScI and presented cellular bridges and cytoplasm with some pro-acrosome vesicles, mitochondria at a cell pole, which is the possible viewer of a centriole in each cell, and a nucleus with thick chromatin (Fig. 2d, e).
According to their shape and localization, the spermatids were subdivided into three subtypes: early stage (St1), middle stage (St2), and late stage (St3) (Fig. 3a–d). In the early stage (St1) (3.53 ± 0.2 μm), the cytoplasm contains several electron-dense granules, two pairs of mitochondria, a large spherical acrosomal vesicle, along with the centriole, the nucleus contains thick electron-dense heterochromatin materials with a small amount of euchromatin (Fig. 3b). Middle stage (St2) (Fig. 3c) presents a nucleus containing densely packed heterochromatin, acrosomal vesicles with the rounded shape at the cell pole, while mitochondria remain at the posterior end of the cell (3.29 ± 0.2 μm). In the late stage (St3) with reduced cytoplasm and well-defined cellular compartments, acrosomal vesicle, subacrosomal space containing electron-dense granules, a nucleus with condensed chromatin (3.06 ± 0.1 μm), the subacrosomal space is apparent between the acrosomal vesicle and the nucleus, the proximal and distal centrioles, as well as the flagellum, are located at the caudal end of the cell (Fig. 3d).
Spermatozoa (1.56 μm) were found in the lumen of the tubule gonadal (Fig. 3f) and had ovoid heads (Fig. 3g, inset 1). In the upper central piece of the acrosome, there were transverse bands with three or four layers of structures (Fig. 3 h, inset 2). In the subacrosomal space, electron-dense granules containing axial rod and condensed chromatin were demonstrated (Fig. 3h, white arrow). In the middle piece of the spermatozoa, we observed four round mitochondria with tubule-vesicular cristae in an electron opaque matrix homogeneously distributed, enclosed the proximal and distal centrioles (Fig. 3i, k, inset 3). In the flagellum, the main piece was characterized by the arrangement of nine pairs of peripheral microtubules and a central pair constituting the 9 + 2 structure (Fig. 3 i, Inset 4).
Discussion
In the present study, we characterized the gonadal tissue of C. gasar males. A pattern of organization of the germinal epithelium was observed inside the gonadal tubule, consisting of ISC and germline cells. This arrangement describes a centripetal development, where spermatogonia are adhered to the wall of the gonadal tubule, forming the first layers of cells. These germ cell distribution patterns look those of other bivalves, C. corteziensis (Rodríguez-Jaramillo et al. 2008), C. gigas (Franco et al. 2008; Kim et al. 2010a, b), and C. virginica (Hillman and Galtsoff 1965; O’Beirn et al. 1996). Therefore, the organization and reduction of the diameter of the cell nucleus of germ cells in the gonadal tubule can follow a pattern conserved mainly in bivalve mollusks.
C. gasar we found that ISC is distributed among germ cells, their location and cell pattern are like those observed in other mollusk species (Eckelbarger and Davis 1996; Erkan and Sousa 2002; Franco et al. 2011). The ultrastructural organization of ISC is compatible with the functions ensured by Sertoli cells in vertebrate and can assist the development of germ cells, serve as support, protection, and nutrition (Watanabe et al. 2020). In addition to promoting phagocytosis of residual bodies discarded by spermatids at the end of spermiogenesis (Franco et al. 2011; Kobayashi et al. 2020).
Spermatogonia have been classified into different types, based on location, cell size, and presence of nucleoli, and are the largest cells in the gonadal tubules of C. gasar, as in other studies of bivalves (Franco et al. 2008; Kim et al. 2010a, b; Yurchenko and Vaschenko 2010). In the present study, there was spermatogonia A, which exhibits large nuclei containing a low amount of euchromatin and several cytoplasmic granulofibrillar electron-dense bodies and in close relationship with mitochondria, similar features were observed in other bivalves, Amiantis umbonella (Al-Mohanna et al. 2001) and C. gigas (Franco et al. 2008). While Spermatogonia B exhibits large nuclei containing a relatively high amount of euchromatin with a prominent nucleolus and observed the presence of several dense round granulofibrillar bodies in the cytoplasm, where the presence of this structure can be identified as nuage, the observation of this material in spermatogonia is common in these cell types in spermatogonia has been described in S. forskali and C. angulata, the origin of these materials being related to mitochondria (Reunov et al. 2000).
The spermatocyte I of C. gasar showed alterations in the nucleus, with gradual condensation of chromatin and disappearance of the nucleolus, especially in the phase of pachytene, related to genetic recombination between homologous chromosomes. These characteristics were like those described in C. angulata (Sousa and Oliveira 1994) and C. virginica (Eckelbarger and Davis 1996).
In spermatocyte II, the chromatin filaments are more condensed and located in the central region of the nucleus; this cell type is widely described in mollusks (Reunov and Hodgson 1994; Yurchenko et al. 2021, 2022). However, it is rarely observed in vertebrates, since it is a rapid phase transition during meiosis (Mazzoni et al. 2014; Gonçalves et al. 2019). The pro-acrosomal vesicle in the spermatocytes of C. gasar, as well as observed in other species of the genus, as found in C. angulata (Sousa and Oliveira 1994), C. gigas (Franco et al. 2008), and C. virginica (O’Beirn et al. 1996).
Based on acrosome formation and chromatin condensation, C. gasar spermatids were classified as early stage, medium stage, and late stage. The early stage spermatid has diffused homogeneous nuclear chromatin and bridging interconnections in the cytoplasm. A similar appearance has previously been found in C. gigas (Franco et al. 2008; Yurchenko et al. 2010). In middle-stage spermatids, the acrosomal vesicle is located at the cell pole, exhibiting more condensed chromatin. The late-stage spermatid comprises three distinct compartments: the acrosomal vesicle, the subacrosomal region and the nucleus, and the beginning of flagella formation. In contrast, there are reports in mollusks that the formation of flagella occurs in spermatocytes, as evidenced in C. virginica (Eckelbarger and Davis 1996) and Pitar rudis, Chamelea gallina (Erkan and Sousa 2002). Therefore, the process of flagella formation can occur at different stages of spermiogenesis which may occur later in C. gasar.
C. gasar spermatozoa has an ovoid head with a cone-shaped acrosome. In addition, we evidenced transverse bands that alternate in electron-dense (dark) and electron-lucid (light) areas in the upper region of the acrosome. Bivalves spermatozoa probably have less vigorous movements and do not need long distances to find oocytes for fertilization. According to literature suggest that these structures may play a signaling role, releasing mature spermatozoa into the external environment (Eckelbarger et al. 1990; Reunov and Hodgson 1994; Yurchenko et al. 2021).
The middle piece has four round mitochondria with tubule-vesicular cristae, similar to that seen in spermatozoa from other oysters, such as C. gigas, Saccostrea commercialis, and C. angulate (Kim et al. 2010a, b; Nuurai et al. 2016; Sousa and Oliveira 1994), in contrast that observed in Crassostrea virginica, Crassostrea rhizophorae that exhibit more than the four conventional mitochondria (Eckelbarger et al. 1990; Eckelbarger and Davis 1996; Machado and Passos 2022) and other bivalves with a different number of mitochondria. We believe that the variation in the number of mitochondria in the middle piece of the spermatozoa may be related to the energy consumption of each species, since this characteristic differs within the genus.
In the present study, a long flagellum was observed, the central piece has the typical shape of the axoneme 9 + 2, and the distal centriole is oriented on the same axis; similar features were observed all the oysters studied (Kim et al. 2010a, b; Healy et al. 2015; Yurchenko et al. 2021). Thus, the success of external fertilization can be ensured by the great quantity of gametes released into the external environment.
The morphometry of the nuclei of male germ cells in Crassostrea gasar is similar other studies with bivalves, Saccostrea forskali, Saccostrea commercialis, and Crassostrea virginica (Nuurai et al. 2016; Healy and Lester 1991; Yurchenko et al. 2010). The male germ cells in bivalves are small compared to vertebrates (Santos et al. 2001; Lo Nostro et al. 2003). In oysters, there is a continuous decrease in the size of germ cells during spermatogenesis.
In this study, we identified specific cellular aspects for C. gasar, a reduced number of mitochondria in the spermatozoa and long flagellum. These characteristics may be of help in phylogenetic study and the reproductive biology of bivalve mollusks, mainly species of socioeconomic interest.
Data availability
Data will be available upon request.
References
Al-Mohanna SY, Al-Rukhais LB, Meakins RH (2001) Spermatogenesis in Amiantis umbonella (Bivalvia) in Kuwait Bay, Kuwait. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 81:517–522. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315401004167
Bozzo MG, Ribes E, Sagrista E et al (1993) Fine structure of the spermatozoa of Crassostrea gigas (Mollusca, Bivalvia). Mol Reprod Dev 34:206–211. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1080340213
Christo SW, Absher TM (2006) Reproductive Period of Crassostrea Rhizophorae (Guilding, 1828) and Crassostrea Brasiliana (Lamark, 1819) (Bivalvia: Ostreidae) in Guaratuba Bay, Paraná, Brazil. J Coast Res 2:1215–1218
de Souza Sampaio D, Tagliaro CH, Schneider H, Beasley CR (2019) Oyster culture on the Amazon mangrove coast: asymmetries and advances in an emerging sector. Rev Aquac 11:88–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12227
Eckelbarger KJ, Davis CV (1996) Ultrastructure of the gonad and gametogenesis in the eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica. II Testis and spermatogenesis. Mar Biol 127:89–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993648
Eckelbarger KJ, Bieler R, Mikkelsen PM (1990) Ultrastructure of sperm development and mature sperm morphology in three species of commensal bivalves (Mollusca: Galeommatoidea). J Morphol 205:63–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.1052050107
Erkan M, Sousa M (2002) Fine structural study of the spermatogenic cycle in Pitar rudis and Chamelea gallina (Mollusca, Bivalvia, Veneridae). Tissue Cell 34:262–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-8166(02)00016-2
Franco A, Heude Berthelin C, Goux D et al (2008) Fine structure of the early stages of spermatogenesis in the Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas (Mollusca, Bivalvia). Tissue Cell 40:251–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tice.2007.12.006
Franco A, Kellner K, Goux D et al (2011) Intragonadal somatic cells (ISCs) in the male oyster Crassostrea gigas: morphology and contribution in germinal epithelium structure. Micron 42:718–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2011.04.003
Gonçalves LAB, Silva GMF, Viana IKS et al (2019) Testicular structure and development of germ cells of Hypophthalmus marginatus Valenciennes 1840 (Siluriformes: Pimelodidae). Anim Reprod Sci 211:106223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2019.106223
Gosling E (2015) Marine bivalve molluscs. Wiley, New Jersey
Gwo J-C, Hsu T-H (2020) Ultrastructure of sperm and complete mitochondrial genome in Meretrix sp. (Bivalvia: Veneridae) from Taiwan. Tissue Cell 67:101454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tice.2020.101454
Healy JM, Mikkelsen PM, Bieler R (2015) Sperm ultrastructure in honeycomb (foam) oysters (Mollusca, Bivalvia, Gryphaeidae, Pycnodontinae): comparison with other Ostreoidea and taxonomic implications. Invertebr Biol 134:136–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/ivb.12086
Hillman RE, Galtsoff PS (1965) The American Oyster, Crassostrea virginica Gmelin. Chesap Sci 6:199. https://doi.org/10.2307/1350854
Kasmini L, Batubara AS (2022) Biology and ecological functional of genus Crassostrea (Bivalvia: Ostreidae): a review. Depik 11:75–84. https://doi.org/10.13170/depik.11.1.23444
Kim JH, Chung E-Y, Choi K-H et al (2010a) Ultrastructure of the testis and germ cell development during spermatogenesis in male Crassostrea gigas (Bivalvia: Ostreidae) in Western Korea. Korean J. Malacol. 26(3): 235-244
Kim JH, Chung E-Y, Lee K-Y et al (2010b) Spermatid differentiations during spermiogenesis and mature sperm ultrastructure in male Crassostrea nipponica (Seki, 1934, Pteroirmorphia: Ostreidae). Korean J Malacol 26(4): 311-316
Kobayashi O, Tomizuka S, Shimizu S, Machida R (2020) Sertoli cells in the freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera laevis (Bivalvia: Margaritiferidae): a histological and ultrastructural study. Tissue Cell 64:101342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tice.2020.101342
Lameira Silva OL, Veríssimo SMM, da Rosa AMBP et al (2020) Effect of environmental factors on microbiological quality of oyster farming in Amazon estuaries. Aquac Rep 18:100437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2020.100437
Liu J, Li Q, Kong L et al (2011) Identifying the true oysters (Bivalvia: Ostreidae) with mitochondrial phylogeny and distance-based DNA barcoding. Mol Ecol Resour 11:820–830. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03025.x
Machado FM, Passos FD (2022) Revisiting the morphological aspects of the Anomalodesmata (Mollusca: Bivalvia): a phylogenetic approach. Invertebr Syst 36:1063–1098. https://doi.org/10.1071/IS22028
Mazzoni TS, Grier HJ, Quagio-Grassiotto I (2014) Male gonadal differentiation and the paedomorphic evolution of the testis in Teleostei. Anat Rec 297:1137–1162. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.22915
Melo CMR, Silva FC, Gomes CHAM et al (2010) Crassostrea gigas in natural oyster banks in southern Brazil. Biol Invasions 12:441–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9475-7
Mylonas CC, Duncan NJ, Asturiano JF (2016) Hormonal manipulations for the enhancement of sperm production in cultured fish and evaluation of sperm quality. Aquaculture 472:21–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.04.021
Nuurai P, Panasophonkul S, Tinikul Y et al (2016) Spermatogenesis in the rock oyster, Saccostrea forskali (Gmelin, 1791). Tissue Cell 48:43–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tice.2015.11.001
O’Beirn FX, Heffernan PB, Walker RL, Jansen ML (1996) Young-of-the-year oyster, Crassostrea virginica, reproduction in coastal Georgia. Estuaries 19:651. https://doi.org/10.2307/1352525
Oliveira LFS, Ferreira MAP, Juen L et al (2018) Influence of the proximity to the ocean and seasonality on the growth performance of farmed mangrove oysters (Crassostrea gasar) in tropical environments. Aquaculture 495:661–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.06.049
Paixão L, Ferreira MA, Nunes Z et al (2013) Effects of salinity and rainfall on the reproductive biology of the mangrove oyster (Crassostrea gasar): implications for the collection of broodstock oysters. Aquaculture 380–383:6–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.11.019
Pantoja JCD, Oliveira LFS, Ferreira MAP et al (2020) Salinity and rainfall as inducers of cell proliferation and apoptosis in mangrove oyster Crassostrea gasar spermatogenesis. Reg Stud Mar Sci 39:101411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2020.101411
Reunov AA, Hodgson AN (1994) Ultrastructure of the spermatozoa of five species of South African bivalves (Mollusca), and an examination of early spermatogenesis. J Morphol 219:275–283. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.1052190307
Reunov A, Isaeva V, Au D, Wu R (2000) Nuage constituents arising from mitochondria: Is it possible? Dev Growth Differ 42:139–143. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-169x.2000.00492.x
Rodríguez-Jaramillo C, Hurtado MA, Romero-Vivas E et al (2008) Gonadal development and histochemistry of the tropical oyster, Crassostrea corteziensis (Hertlein, 1951) during an annual reproductive cycle. J Shellfish Res 27:1129–1141. https://doi.org/10.2983/0730-8000-27.5.1129
Salvi D, Mariottini P (2016) Molecular taxonomy in 2D: a novel ITS2 rRNA sequence-structure approach guides the description of the oysters’ subfamily Saccostreinae and the genus Magallana (Bivalvia: Ostreidae). Zool J Linn Soc. https://doi.org/10.1111/zoj.12455
Sousa M, Oliveira E (1994) An ultrastructural study of Crassostrea angulata (Mollusca, Bivalvia) spermatogenesis. Mar Biol 120:545–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00350074
Varela ES, Beasley CR, Schneider H et al (2007) Molecular phylogeny of mangrove oysters (Crassostrea) from Brazil. J Molluscan Stud 73:229–234. https://doi.org/10.1093/mollus/eym018
Viana IKS, Gicelle MFS, Pantoja JCD et al (2022) Subfamily hypostominae: similarities and differences in testicular structure of Amazonian fish. BMC Zool 7:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40850-021-00106-5
Watanabe TT, Nascimento FA, Mantelatto FL, Zara FJ (2020) Ultrastructure and histochemistry of the male reproductive system of the genus Callinectes Stimpson, 1860 (Brachyura: Portunidae). J Morphol 281:1660–1678. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.21277
Yurchenko OV, Vaschenko MA (2010) Morphology of spermatogenic and accessory cells in the mussel Modiolus kurilensis under environmental pollution. Mar Environ Res 70:171–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2010.04.007
Yurchenko OV, Radashevsky VI, Reunov AA (2010) Ultrastructural study of spermatogenesis in the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas (Bivalvia: Ostreidae) from the Sea of Japan. Invertebr Zool 7:55–69. https://doi.org/10.15298/invertzool.07.1.04
Yurchenko OV, Neznanova SYu, Chernyshev AV (2021) A comparative morphological study of the testes, spermatogenesis, and spermatozoa in two nemertean species, Callinera sp. and Parahubrechtia sp. (Palaeonemertea, Tubulanidae). Zool Anz 294:114–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcz.2021.08.005
Yurchenko OV, Borzykh OG, Kalachev AV (2022) Microscopic anatomy of gonadal area in the deep-sea clam Calyptogena pacifica (Bivalvia: Vesicomyidae) with emphasis on somatic cells. Tissue Cell 75:101743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tice.2022.101743
Healy J, Lester R (1991). Sperm ultrastructure in the Australian oyster Saccostrea commercialis (Iredale & Roughley) (Bivalvia: Ostreoidea). J. Molluscan Stud., 57. https://doi.org/10.1093/mollus/57.2.219
Santos JE, Bazzoli N, Rizzo E, SAntos GB (2001). Morphofunctional organization of the male reproductive system of the catfish Iheringichthys labrosus (Lutken, 1874) (Siluriformes: Pimelodidae). Tissue and Cell 33 (5): 533-540
Lo Nostro FL, Greir H, Meijide FJ, Guerrero GA (2003). Ultrastructure of the testis in Synbrachus marmoratus (Teleostei, Synbranchidae): the germinal compartment. Tissue & Cell, 35: 121-132
Acknowledgements
The authors are especially grateful to the oyster culture Associação dos Agricultores e Aquicultores de Nova Olinda, (AGROMAR), in Augusto Corrêa, Mr. Jorginho for their cooperation and hospitality during field-work, My collection friend Jonathan Alves de Sousa, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA) for Agreement 05/2016, National Council of Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) for financial support awarded to the Rossineide Martins da Rocha (303140/2022-4), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) for granting a scholarship—finance code 001, and to the Animal Science Graduate Program (PPGCAN).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JP, MF, IV, RO, ZN, GS, and RR wrote the main manuscript text. JP and RO prepared the samples. JP, RO, and MA performed scanning electron microscopy. JP, IV, and RO prepared the figures. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Pantoja, J.C.D., Ferreira, M.A.P., Viana, I.K.S. et al. Morphological approaches as tools to study the development of male germ cells of Crassostrea gasar (Mollusca, Bivalvia). Zoomorphology 143, 47–56 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00435-023-00632-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00435-023-00632-5