Introduction

Upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) are among the most frequent infections around the world and might be defined as an inflammation on the upper airways that refer to the part of the respiratory system above the vocal cords, including nose, sinuses, pharynx, larynx, and large airways. The causative agents of URTIs are typically viruses that often cause a mild and self-limited disease. Upper respiratory tract infections are the leading cause of doctor visits and account for an estimated 10 million outpatient appointments resulting large economic burden in a year. It has also been reported that the URTIs are responsible for greater than 20 million missed days of school and work lost [1]. Preschool children often suffer from a URTI approximately 6 up to 12 times a year; those who attend daycare may have as many as 14 times, and the incidence gradually decreases with age [2].

In recent years, over-the-counter cold medications have been reported that they may be an effective treatment option to improve the symptoms of URTIs, one of which is Pelargonium sidoides root extract [3]. Pelargonium sidoides (African geranium) is a traditional medicinal plant native to South Africa. It is one of the ornamental geraniums of which roots extract have been thought to be effective in the treatment of several acute infections for centuries. The apparent effectiveness of the root extract derived from Pelargonium sidoides in the treatment of infections caused by several microorganisms has been associated with its constituents known as tannins such as gallic acid, gallocatechin, catechin, other polyphenols, and coumarins. Immune-modulatory activities of Pelargonium sidoides are mainly mediated through the release of tumor necrosis factor (TNF-alfa) and nitric oxides, the stimulation of interferon-gamma, and also the increase of natural killer cell activity [4, 5]. Due to the fact that there is no certain proof in distinguishing between bacterial and viral infections, the physicians usually prescribe antibiotics to avoid serious bacterial complications in daily practice. Therefore, there has been a high prevalence of preferring unnecessary antibiotics in URTIs [6]. The herbal liquid root extract of Pelargonium sidoides, occasionally prescribed by physicians in treating patients with acute respiratory tract infections, is a non-antibiotic alternative implementation. It has recently been shown that the use of the Pelargonium sidoides root extract and selected phytopharmaceuticals was provided to be effective in decreasing the antibiotic prescriptions in adults with acute respiratory infections in a retrospective study conducted by Martin et al. [7]. Another double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial published in early 2021 has reported that the root extract from Pelargonium sidoides might be an option to provide a reduction in antibiotic use in adults diagnosed with lower respiratory tract infection [8].

Although there has been declared that Pelargonium sidoides may be effective in alleviating symptoms in adults who suffered from acute rhinosinusitis and the common cold and has been reported that there was a relief for the symptoms of acute bronchitis in adults and children, the clinical effectiveness of Pelargonium sidoides in children with acute URTIs has not been clearly defined yet [3]. Thus, the placebo-controlled study was planned to evaluate the effectiveness of the Pelumm©—a solution derived from the dried root extract of Pelargonium sidoides—in relieving the symptoms associated with URTIs in children.

Materials and methods

Setting

The study was performed from January 2019 to January 2020 in the outpatient department of Ege University, Medical School, Children’s Hospital, Izmir, Turkey, as a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III clinical search, with 2 parallel treatment groups. The study was conducted according to Good Clinical Practice, the declaration of Helsinki Somerset West 1997 (World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki, 1997), and legal regulations. Approvals of the Ethics Committee, Ministry of Health of Turkey [19-AKD-45], and the regulatory authorities were obtained before starting the study. During the enrolment period, the investigators registered all screened patients with symptoms of acute URTI.

The baseline characteristics of the subjects, study design, and medication

Male or female 164 (aged 1–18 years) patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria (inclusion and exclusion criteria shown in Additional material-1) were evaluated, and it was taken a provision of written informed consent from parents for the study. After written informed consent, as part of the baseline data, investigators recorded the patient’s past medical history, baseline symptoms of the URTIs, and demographic data (age, sex, the symptoms, etc.) at the initial visit. All subjects had no past medical history and chronic illness. The individual duration of the study was 7 days. During this time, 4 visits were scheduled (day 0; day 3; day 5; day 7) and the investigator examined each patient to follow-up and for clinical evaluation during the first three visits, and the last visit (day 7) was fulfilled on the phone. A computer-aided random series program was used to generate the random allocation sequence, a list of unique integer random numbers identified as patient code. Following the randomization, the subjects were given verum containing a herbal drug preparation named Pelumm© ((Pelumm©; 1:8–10; dried, extraction solvent: ethanol 11% (w ⁄ w); 1 cc = 20 drops = 0.018468 g)—a solution derived from the dried root extract of Pelargonium sidoides (n = 82)—or placebo (n = 82) that was matched with respect to solvent composition, appearance, taste, viscosity, and color. Dosing of the study drug was 3 × 10 drops (patients 1–5 years old), 3 × 20 drops (patients 5–12 years old), or 3 × 30 drops (patients > 12 years old) of Pelumm© or placebo, at least 30 min before or after meals, from day 1 and continuing until day 7. In the case of fever (> 39 °C), paracetamol was allowed for the patients.

Total symptom score

The total symptom score (TSS) consisted of 13 symptoms considered to be associated with the URTI [9, 10]. (Patient evaluation form-Additional material-2).

Patient’s symptoms

The severity of the listed eight symptoms was scored according to the following system:

Fever (Axillary and/or tympanic, °C): 1 point ≤ 37; 2 point = 37–38; 3 point = 38–3; 4 point ≥ 39.

Malaise: 0 point = None; 1 point = Slight; 2 point = Moderate; 3 point = Pronounced; 4 point = Very pronounced; 5 point = Exceptionally severe.

Headache: 1 point = None; 2 point = Mild; 3 point = Moderate; 4 point = Severe; 5 point = Very severe.

Sneezing: 0 point = None; 1 point = Infrequent, mild; 2 point = More frequent, mild; 3 point = Moderate; 4 point = Pronounced, quite frequent; 5 point = Very pronounced and frequent.

Myalgia: 1 point = None; 2 point = Mild; 3 point = Moderate; 4 point = Pronounced; 5 point = Very Pronounced.

Rhinorrhea: 0 point = None; 1 point = Not so much; 2 point = Moderate; 3 point = Pronounced; 4 point = Very pronounced.

Sore throat: 0 point = None; 1 point = Mild; 2 point = Moderate; 3 point = Pronounced; 4 point = Very Pronounced; 5 point = Unbearable.

Feeling dry throat: 0 point = None; 1 point = Mild; 2 point = Moderate; 3 point = Pronounced; 4 point = Very Pronounced.

Purulent rhinorrhea, purulent eyes, frequent cough, dry cough, and purulent cough were evaluated as “the present” or “absent” and were scored; the “present”: 1 point; the “absent”: 0 points. Then, from the beginning to the seventh day, drops of the root extract of Pelargonium sidoides were investigated whether there was an influence to improve the symptoms of URTIs according to the value of the total mean symptom score (the mean symptom score value was found by dividing the total points to 13). Symptoms were assessed on baseline days (day 0), 3, 5, and 7 of the treatment period. At each of the follow-up visits, the investigator evaluated the patients for their clinical status, defined the adverse events, and examined whether there was a progression to the other diagnoses (Pneumonia, etc.).

Outcomes

The primary outcome criterion was to define whether there could be an improvement in the TSS from day 0 to day 7 in the patients given the liquid root extract from Pelargonium sidoides. Secondary outcome criteria for effectiveness were as follows: whether there could be a decrease in the severity and duration of the individual symptoms between visit intervals in the active treatment groups compared with the placebo group, and determination of whether it could be a benefit on the administration of the liquid herbal preparation derived from Pelargonium sidoides in the early stage of URTIs.

Statistical analysis

Regarding the variables and onset time of the treatment effectiveness in improving, descriptive and other statistical methods were used to compare the groups. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS version 21.0 for personal computers (Chicago, IL, USA). The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to check the normality assumption of the continuous variables. We used Fisher’s exact test, Pearson chi-square test, and Mc Nemar test for categorical data. In cases of non -normally distributed data, the Mann–Whitney U test was utilized, and the T-test was used in cases of normally distributed data to determine whether the difference between the two groups was statistically significant. A two-tailed probability value p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

In order to test the global effect of the factors group, time point, and group-time interaction, a repeated-measures analysis of variance was performed. Nonparametric Brunner and Langer model (F1-LD-F1) was used to testing group and dependent group effects by using web-based software (R software, version 3.5.2, package: nparLD, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; http://r-project.org) [11]. The model was expected to answer the question as to what extent the difference in improvement between the treatment group and placebo group could affect the results in the repeated evaluation of patients by day. In the case of one additional factor, side time, a separate model was performed for each group. Then a Mann–Whitney U test was performed for each time point. Data were presented with the median and minimum–maximum or interquartile range (IQR). The test was performed only for the symptoms showing a statistically significant difference among groups in the Brunner and Langer model. All p values were corrected for multiple testing by Bonferroni-Holm adjustment. The level of significance was set at 0.05.

Results

Disposition of patients and baseline characteristics

A total of 164 patients were included in screening and subsequently randomized to receive a solution, herbal preparation containing the dried root extract from Pelargonium sidoides (n = 82) or placebo (n = 82). Table 1 has shown the demographic data and baseline median symptom scores of the patients. The median age of the study group was 4.8 (5.2) years; 93 (56.7%) patients were male, and 71 (43.3%) were female. The demographic data showed no significant differences between the group treated with the herbal drug preparation from Pelargonium sidoides and the group treated with placebo. In addition, the baseline (day 0) median scores of the 13 symptoms were similar between the groups except for the fever. The median score of the fever was significantly higher in the placebo group than in the verum group.

Table 1 The baseline demographic data and baseline symptoms of the subjects

Primary outcome measure: symptom scores

The total symptom scores of all available patients in both the treatment and placebo groups were shown in Table 2. No statistically significant differences between the individual total TSS of participants of the treatment group and the placebo group on baseline (day 0), day 3, and day 5 were found. However, comparing the median TSS within groups between day 0 and day 7, it was found that the median of TSS significantly decreased by 0.85 points in the root extract group compared to a decrease of 0.62 points in the placebo group (p = 0.018).

Table 2 The comparisons of the total symptom scores for visit days between the treatment group and the placebo group

Secondary outcome measures: effectiveness of the solution derived from the dried root extract of Pelargonium sidoides in the individual symptoms, and administration time of the solution (Pelumm©)

According to the presence or absence of all symptoms among the visit day intervals, Table 3 has shown the improvement situation in each group. There was a relief in symptoms including “Fever,” “Malaise,” “Headache,” “Sneezing,” “Myalgia,” “Rhinorrhea,” “Sore throat,” and “Feeling dry throat” in both groups on all visit day intervals. It was also detected that there was no superiority of the verum for “purulent eyes” and “purulent cough.” However, “cough frequency” showed a statistically significant decrease in the Pelargonium sidoides group compared with the placebo on day 3 (p = 0.023). The item dry coughing the improvement at day 0–day 5 (p = 0.001) was more pronounced in the treatment group. The purulent rhinorrhea revealed a statistically significant decline in the Pelargonium sidoides group compared to the placebo on day 7 (p = 0.023).

Table 3 Effect of the dried root extracts derived from Pelargonium sidoides compared with the placebo on the symptoms of URTIs

In order to determine the significance of the scores change in eight symptoms, known as the Brunner and Langer model, a repeated measures analysis of variance was utilized to test the global effect group, time point, and interaction of the factors. According to the model, the interaction of variables was firstly evaluated, and it was found that the time-dependent progression in groups was similar for malaise, headache, myalgia, sore throat, and the feeling dry throat due to the fact that the interaction p values were not significant. The p values of the Group, Time, and Interaction from baseline day to 7th respectively; malaise: p = 0.888, p < 0.001, and p = 0.154; headache: p = 0.621, p < 0.001, and p = 0.694; myalgia: p = 0.383, p < 0.001, and p = 0.843; sore throat: p = 0.190, p < 0.001, and p = 0.748; and feeling dry throat: p = 0.175, p < 0.001, and p = 0.730. There were no treatment effects of verum on the five symptoms (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Visit days dependent change of the symptoms between Pelargonium sidoides group and placebo group (Group A; the dried root extracts from Pelargonium sidoides, Group B; placebo, Time1; baseline day, Time2; day 3, Time3; day 5, Time4; day 7)

However, it was detected a significant interaction (p < 0.10) via Brunner and Langer model in rhinorrhea, sneezing, and fever. The p values of the Group, Time, and Interaction from baseline day to 7th, respectively; sneezing: p = 0.377, p < 0.001, and p = 0.014; rhinorrhea: p = 0.954, p < 0.001, and p = 0.064; and fever: p = 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.001. There was a significant recovery in “sneezing” on day 3 and in “fever” on day 5 (Table 4; Fig. 2) in the binary comparisons of each time point in the three symptoms, following Bonferroni-Holm correction. Although “Rhinorrhea” showed a significant “interaction,” there was no significant difference in visit day intervals between the two groups.

Table 4 The symptom scores analysis for rhinorrhea, sneezing, and fever in visit day intervals after the Brunner-Langer model
Fig. 2
figure 2

Visit days dependent change of Sneezing, Rhinorrhea, and Fever between Pelargonium sidoides group and placebo group (Group A; the dried root extracts from Pelargonium sidoides, Group B; placebo, Time1; baseline day, Time2; day 3, Time3; day 5, Time4; day 7)

Differences of TSS in the visit days related to the onset time of the symptoms in both treatment and placebo have been evaluated, and concerning the onset time of the URTI symptoms (also the same time for administrations), the participants were divided into 3 groups. When analyzing the differences of TSS between the visit days for each drug start time among the groups; the liquid herbal drug that was given in the first 24 h after the onset of the symptoms has provided a statistically significant reduction in the symptoms scores of the treatment group compared to the placebo. Within 48–72 h after the onset of the symptoms, a reduction in TSS was found in Pelargonium sidoides group compared with placebo. The total score change values at the end of treatment indicated significantly greater improvement in the treatment group than the placebo group in day 0 to day 3 and in day 0 to day 7 (difference of TSS 0.18 and 0.17 point, p = 0.011; p = 0.023, respectively).

The overall effect size of a solution derived from the dried root extract of Pelargonium sidoides on difference symptom scores was also found to be high than the placebo on day 0–day 3 and day 0–day 7 days. The d values of the effect size indicated that the effect of a solution derived from the dried root extract of Pelargonium sidoides was Big-intermediate effect ((df = 85, t = 2.600, d = 0.56; p = 0.011; 95% CI 0.04033–0.30257) and (df = 69.492, t = 2.332, d = 0.56; p = 0.023; 95% CI 0.026659–0.31116)) (Effect size (d): \(2t /\surd df\)) [12].

Discussion

The results of this randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center clinical study demonstrated the impact on decreasing the burden of the symptoms during URTIs in pediatric patients aged 1–18 years suffering from URTIs. The primary outcome parameter was that a significant superiority of Pelargoniım sidoides on reducing the median total symptom score from day 0 to day 7 in the active treatment group compared with the placebo group. The second outcome parameter, the administration of the solution derived from the dried root extract of Pelargonium sidoides (Pelumm©; a solution derived from the dried root extract of Pelargonium sidoides), was a favorable treatment compared with placebo for dry cough, sneezing, reducing the frequency of cough, and fever. Moreover, the early administration of the herbal drug preparation Pelargonium sidoides has been shown to relieve the symptoms and be an initiator in alleviating the symptoms.

Despite its high prevalence, however, there is no effective treatment of the virus originated URTIs in children. Due to the fact that the causative agents of these infections are often viruses, antibiotics are ineffective to treat, except for seconder bacterial infections and their severe complications. Through defined inflammatory pathways, setting targets for the development of new treatment strategies increases and will provide a comfortable recovery of symptoms in URTIs. The effectiveness of dried extract of Pelargonium sidoides has been confirmed in the studies for the management of URTIs in patients with different types of URTIs. The meta-analyses reported that a herbal drug preparation from the roots of Pelargonium sidoides was effectiveness, safe, and well-tolerated during acute respiratory tract infections in children, adolescents, and adults [13,14,15]. In addition, there was a clinically significant advantage in the treatment of acute rhinosinusitis with Pelargonium sidoides in adult patients evaluated with a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study [16]. A recent study conducted by Roth et al. [17] revealed that the Pelargonium sidoides reduced the viral docking proteins in rhinoviruses, particularly associated with bronchitis exacerbations, asthma, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A recent study showed that Pelargonium sidoides induced IL-22 production by CD4 + memory T cells and provided bacterial airway protection [18].

As known, in the early stages of the inflammatory reaction, patients with URTI are particularly suffered from a cough. The inflammation during the URTIs can cause damage to the mucociliary system, causing congestion of mucus secretion in the nose and the paranasal sinuses and triggering a cough. Through the main ingredients, Pelargonium sidoides might promote the defense mechanism of the mucociliary system provides a decrease in mucus viscosity, hence decrease the intensity and frequency of the cough, and it has also been detected that the extracts of Pelargonium sidoides—as a modulator of upper respiratory tract associated immunological responses—might relieve the symptoms by increasing the production of monocyte-related and decreasing the production of neutrophil-related chemokines in acute postviral rhinosinusitis [7, 14, 19]. The above hypothesis is confirmed by the fact that it was found that there was a reducing the frequency of cough via administration of Pelargonium sidoides in our study. Additionally, there was also detected that significant relief in dry cough and sneezing.

In conclusion, the study indicated that the dried root extract of Pelargonium sidoides compared with placebo may be a support treatment option in relieving cough frequency, dry cough, and sneezing during the uncomplicated URTIs, and it might also be effective as an early improver implementation at the onset of signs. The herbal liquid root extracts from Pelargonium sidoides could be a new therapeutical concept in the management of URTIs. As a result of this, the patients would benefit not only from its effectiveness in relieving the symptoms but also from reducing the burden of the symptoms during URTIs.