Abstract
Neuronal plasticity can vary remarkably in its form and degree across animal species. Adult neurogenesis, namely the capacity to produce new neurons from neural stem cells through adulthood, appears widespread in non-mammalian vertebrates, whereas it is reduced in mammals. A growing body of comparative studies also report variation in the occurrence and activity of neural stem cell niches between mammals, with a general trend of reduction from small-brained to large-brained species. Conversely, recent studies have shown that large-brained mammals host large amounts of neurons expressing typical markers of neurogenesis in the absence of cell division. In layer II of the cerebral cortex, populations of prenatally generated, non-dividing neurons continue to express molecules indicative of immaturity throughout life (cortical immature neurons; cINs). After remaining in a dormant state for a very long time, these cINs retain the potential of differentiating into mature neurons that integrate within the preexisting neural circuits. They are restricted to the paleocortex in small-brained rodents, while extending into the widely expanded neocortex of highly gyrencephalic, large-brained species. The current hypothesis is that these populations of non-newly generated “immature” neurons might represent a reservoir of developmentally plastic cells for mammalian species that are characterized by reduced stem cell-driven adult neurogenesis. This indicates that there may be a trade-off between various forms of plasticity that coexist during brain evolution. This balance may be necessary to maintain a “reservoir of plasticity” in brain regions that have distinct roles in species-specific socioecological adaptations, such as the neocortex and olfactory structures.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Neuronal plasticity is recognized as a crucial mechanism through which the central nervous system (CNS) learns from experience, forms memories, modifies the structure of neural networks over time, recovers after lesion or disease, and in some cases, regenerates lost nerve cells (Martino et al. 2011; Aimone et al. 2014; Bao and Song 2018; Obernier and Alvarez-Buylla 2019; Kempermann 2019; Bonfanti and Charvet 2021; La Rosa and Bonfanti 2021). Structural changes can impact the anatomy of the nervous system, from a subcellular to a neural circuit level. The most common type of structural remodeling is synaptic plasticity. It enables changes in connections between neurons, allowing the establishment of neural circuitry during development and subsequent refinement based on experience (Citri and Malenka 2008; Holtmaat and Svoboda 2009; Fig. 1A). This form of plasticity is expected to take place in nearly all parts of the grey matter in the central nervous system (CNS) and is likely well-conserved among mammals, reflected, in part, by the low interspecies variation of synaptic density and structure (apart from some differences probably linked to evolutionary adaptations of neural circuits to particular functions; Sherwood et al. 2020; De Felipe et al. 2002; Alonso-Nanclares et al. 2022). The most striking form of plasticity is adult neurogenesis, namely the formation of new neurons in specific neurogenic regions, as the result of neural stem cell activity (Aimone et al. 2014; Lim and Alvarez-Buylla 2016; Bao and Song 2018; Obernier and Alvarez-Buylla 2019; Fig. 1B). Since its discovery in mammals (Altman and Das 1965; Lois and Alvarez-Buylla 1994), adult neurogenesis has raised considerable interest, and it has been intensively studied with the objective of fostering therapeutic interventions aimed at brain repair, possibly harnessing the regenerative potential of neural stem cells (Martino et al. 2011; Bao and Song 2018). Nevertheless, it is becoming more and more evident that remarkable differences occur among animal species in regenerative capacities: in non-mammalian vertebrates (e.g., fish, amphibia, reptiles) stem cells are quite abundant and widespread in large portions of the CNS, thus granting continuous cell renewal, whereas in mammals the stem cell niches are highly restricted to only two-to-three small brain regions (Bonfanti 2011; Lindsey et al. 2018; Lange and Brand 2020; La Rosa and Bonfanti 2018; Vandestadt et al. 2021; Fig. 2). Accordingly, fish neurogenic processes can provide substantial possibilities for brain repair and regeneration after lesion (Lindsey et al. 2018; Lange and Brand 2020), whereas in mammals most regenerative capacity has been lost (Weil et al. 2008; Bonfanti 2011), the new neurons mainly playing a role in the postnatal maturation of specific neural circuits by sculpting their capability to learn from experience (Aimone et al. 2014; Semënov 2019; Kempermann 2019; Cushman et al. 2021; La Rosa and Bonfanti 2021; Fig. 2). Neurogenic plastic processes also differ among mammals, to serve the appropriate time course/functional adaptation of each species (Barker et al. 2011; Bonfanti and Charvet 2021) and follow diverse lifespans and related developmental schedules (Finlay and Darlington 1995; Workman et al. 2013).
In neurobiological research, the use of laboratory rodents as animal models has been prevalent, which has obscured our appreciation of the interspecies variation in different types of neurogenic plasticity. However, in recent years, these differences have started to come to light (Brenowitz and Zakon 2015; Faykoo-Martinez et al. 2017; La Rosa and Bonfanti 2018). Many researchers working exclusively on mice and rats make claims concerning the putative function(s) of adult neurogenesis by generalizing their conclusions to all mammals (see for example Gage 2019), yet many reports have revealed striking differences among species (Paredes et al. 2016; Parolisi et al. 2018; Sanai et al. 2011). Similarly, some scientists working on non-human primates (e.g., common marmosets, macaques), then generalize to “primates and humans” (see for example Hao et al. 2022). Yet, marmosets have relatively small (brain weight: 8,5 g) and lissencephalic brains (Gyrification index, GI: 1,18), which are remarkably different from other species of anthropoid primates with larger and more highly gyrencephalic brains (e.g., chimpanzee brain weight: 383 g, GI: 2,31; Zilles et al. 2013). In addition, compared to other anthropoid primates, marmosets exhibit unique life history traits. They have accelerated reproductive rates, shorter lifespans, earlier maturation, and regularly give birth to twins (Tardif et al. 2011; Preuss 2019).
The protracted generation of neurons during postnatal and adult stages has been identified as not merely a brain function, but rather as a “tool” that the brain can utilize to enhance specific functions. The specific functions that benefit from this neuronal generation can differ significantly among species and their socioecological adaptations (Barker et al. 2011). In one of the most elegant review articles written on this subject, Barker et al. (2011) state that “the function of adult neurogenesis is a task-dependent specialization”, so that comparative analysis in widely different species can help to understand neurogenesis as an evolutionarily conserved trait to meet ecological pressures. On this basis, we should “seek multiple explanations for the adaptive significance of adult neurogenesis and how particular ecological needs and evolutionary pathways have directed its function, where it occurs” (Barker et al. 2011). Indeed, remarkable differences do exist in the duration, location, type, and rate of plastic changes in different mammals (Lipp and Bonfanti 2016; Paredes et al. 2016; Palazzo et al. 2018). Recent comparative analyses carried out in rodents and non-rodent mammals have started to reveal possible phylogenetic trends for such variation, suggesting that different animal lineages display evolutionary specializations. Despite technical limits and some controversial data, results mostly converge to indicate that neurogenesis is almost entirely absent in regions of the adult human brain whereas neuronal addition continues into adult life in rodents (reviewed in Paredes et al. 2016; Parolisi et al. 2018; Sorrells et al. 2021; Duque and Spector 2019). The forebrain stem cell niche of the lateral ventricle subventricular zone (SVZ, providing new neurons for the olfactory bulb) is a striking example of interspecies difference (see below). On the other hand, a novel population of cortical “immature” neurons that are generated prenatally, then delaying their maturation and “awakening” during adulthood, are significantly more abundant in large-brained, non-rodent species (Palazzo et al. 2018; La Rosa et al. 2020a; Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4). The hypothesis that various forms of plasticity may arise due to evolutionary trade-offs linked to brain size and other neuroanatomical adaptations is gaining momentum. In this review article, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview and analysis of the existing data, while also placing them in a phylogenetic context. We will emphasize the gaps in our knowledge that continue to hinder a universally shared understanding of these topics. Understanding the implications of these trade-offs in different forms of neuronal plasticity has significant implications for mammals with varying brain sizes and adaptations. It can shed light on how different species have evolved distinct strategies to optimize cognitive abilities, sensory processing, and behavioral flexibility. By examining these trade-offs, we can gain valuable insights into the evolutionary mechanisms underlying the diversity of mammalian brains and their functional capacities.
Heterogeneity of neurogenic processes: newly generated and non-newly generated “immature” cells coexist in adult brains
Before addressing phylogenetic variation of neurogenic processes, we summarize recent developments in the field that are changing our view about the possibility for adult brains to add new neurons through life. Until recently, efforts in developmental neurobiology have been mostly focused on stem cell-driven neurogenesis (Bonfanti and Peretto, 2011; Aimone et al. 2014; Bond et al. 2015; Lim and Alvarez-Buylla 2016; Kempermann 2019; Obernier and Alvarez-Buylla 2019). The discovery of adult mammalian neurogenesis raised new hopes to develop therapeutic strategies for neurological disorders (Martino et al. 2011; Bao and Song 2018). A huge number of reports have been published in the last 30 years (> 13,000 papers in PubMed) increasing our knowledge of the genesis, differentiation, integration, and modulation of new neurons in specific “neurogenic sites” located in restricted brain regions (mostly the olfactory bulb and hippocampus; Aimone et al. 2014; Lim and Alvarez-Buylla 2016). Over the years, other regions were proposed to host “non canonical” neurogenic processes, a finding which became more evident when different mammalian (non-rodent) species were analyzed (Ponti et al. 2006, 2008, 2010; Luzzati et al. 2006; Barker et al. 2011; Feliciano et al. 2015; Amrein 2015). In parallel, it was suggested that even in “canonical” neurogenic sites, remarkable variation can exist depending on the animal species and/or ages considered (Sanai et al. 2011; Patzke et al. 2015; Lipp and Bonfanti 2016; Parolisi et al. 2017, 2018; Cipriani et al. 2018; Sorrells et al. 2018; see dedicated section below). All these variables increased the complexity of the field, sometimes creating confusion in the interpretation of results (Lipp and Bonfanti 2016; Oppenheim 2019; Duque et al. 2022). Apart from technical considerations regarding common pitfalls in the reliable detection of cell genesis, which have been addressed elsewhere (Duque and Spector 2019), some bona fide mistakes can be generated by erroneous interpretation of markers of immaturity that are commonly used in the study of adult neurogenesis, such as the cytoskeletal protein doublecortin (DCX; Nacher et al. 2001) and the polysialylated, low-adhesive form of the Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule (PSA-NCAM; Acheson et al. 1991). Since these proteins are transiently expressed by neuroblasts produced in the neurogenic niches, they were universally considered as reliable markers, or proxies, for neurogenesis and “an alternative to bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) labeling” (Brown et al. 2003; Bonfanti 2006). On this basis, neurogenesis was reported to occur in various brain regions out of the canonical stem cell niches, some of which were found to host DCX-immunoreactive (DCX+) cells that are not associated with cell division and neurogenesis (Bonfanti and Nacher 2012; Nacher and Bonfanti 2015; König et al. 2016; reviewed in La Rosa et al. 2020b). In recent years, researchers have discovered a possible explanation for these observations in layer II of the piriform cortex (paleocortex). A population of cortical “immature” neurons (cINs) have been identified that are not newly generated but are instead born prenatally and continue to exhibit markers of immaturity throughout adulthood (Gómez-Climent et al. 2008; Klempin et al. 2011; Bonfanti and Nacher 2012; König et al. 2016; Bonfanti and Seki 2021; Fig. 1C). These cells undergo delayed maturation and might represent a new form of “neurogenesis without division”, involving “dormant” neural elements “frozen in a stand-by mode” and sharing the same markers of immaturity with newly born neurons (Gómez-Climent et al. 2008; Bonfanti and Nacher 2012; König et al. 2016; Piumatti et al. 2018; Rotheneichner et al. 2018; La Rosa et al. 2020b). Using DCX-Cre-ERT2/Flox-EGFP transgenic mice, in which the green fluorescent protein (GFP) is permanently expressed in DCX+ cells and in their progeny following tamoxifen administration, it was confirmed that most cINs mature throughout life into glutamatergic neurons (Rotheneichner et al. 2018), and can be integrated into the pre-existing piriform cortex network (Benedetti et al. 2020; Fig. 1). Although the role, fate, and significance of this neuronal population, as well as the mechanism leading to block their maturation (and to wake up them later) are still unknown, the cINs can be considered as highly plastic cells which might represent a reservoir of young neurons in adult brains (Rotheneichner et al. 2018; La Rosa et al. 2019, 2020a, b; Benedetti and Couillard-Despres 2022).
Similarly, DCX+ “immature” cells are detectable in subcortical regions (amygdala, claustrum, white matter), also in this case having originally been identified as either neurogenic events (Bernier et al. 2002; Marlatt et al. 2011; Jhaveri et al. 2018) or “immature” neurons (Fudge 2004; Martí-Mengual et al. 2013; Sorrells et al. 2019; Chareyron et al. 2021; reviewed in Ghibaudi and Bonfanti 2022). At these locations our current understanding is incomplete, and further studies are needed to correctly classify these DCX+ cells (Ghibaudi and Bonfanti 2022; see below). For this reason, the present review will mainly focus on the cINs.
The complex issue of the different types of young neurons has slowly emerged across the years within the well-established field of adult neurogenesis (Bonfanti and Seki 2021), and it is rapidly evolving (Benedetti and Couillard-Despres 2022; Ghibaudi and Bonfanti 2022). It is now clear that beside the newly born cell populations produced in the stem cell niches, many DCX+ neurons in adult brains appear to be in a state of protracted or arrested maturation, maintaining immature marker expression and a simple morphology for long time. In mammalian brains, these cell populations coexist with adult neurogenic processes, yet their relative occurrence, distribution and amount can vary remarkably across different species (La Rosa et al. 2020a; Ghibaudi and Bonfanti 2022). While comprehensive studies and comparable data on such phylogenetic variation are scarce and largely incomplete (Fig. 3), the following sections will provide a summary of our current understanding of this subject and the potential evolutionary trade-offs that take place in mammal brain evolution, involving different neurogenic strategies.
Phylogenetic variation in canonical adult neurogenesis
Heterogeneity of approaches can make it difficult to compare adult neurogenesis across species
The issue of occurrence, location and rate of canonical adult neurogenesis in different species is far from being solved, due to the lack of quantitative data obtained in a systematic, comparable way (Fig. 3B). Only a small number out of 700,000 articles published in the neuroscience field since the year 2000, and more than 13,000 articles published on adult neurogenesis since the 1990s, used a comparative approach, the vast majority of the investigations having been performed on laboratory rodents (Lipp and Bonfanti 2016; Cozzi et al. 2020). Some comparative studies describing differences in adult neurogenesis in different mammalian groups are available (see for example Barker et al. 2011; Patzke et al. 2015; Amrein 2015; Paredes et al. 2016; Parolisi et al. 2018), nevertheless the original reports differ in various significant ways, including age of subjects, brain regions examined, source of material, type and time of tissue fixation, postmortem intervals, type of markers, antibodies and detection method employed, type of quantitative analyses, and aim of the study (Zhao and van Praag 2020; Ghibaudi et al. 2023a). Though some researchers point specifically to tissue fixation and postmortem interval as a source of variation in observations (Moreno-Jiménez et al. 2021), in a recent study we highlighted that other variables are important when dealing with comparative immunocytochemical detection of plasticity-related markers (Ghibaudi et al. 2023a). These variables are mainly represented by the choice and availability of primary antibodies (that can react very differently in different species), and by the existence of actual interspecies differences in the presence and distribution of antigens. In our extended study, involving six widely different mammalian species, spanning from mice to humans, we showed that very similar results can be obtained in tissues treated with different types of fixation (including intracardiac perfusion and tissue immersion) and with different postmortem intervals, while both absence of staining or non-specific staining can occur when using different commercially available antibodies (Ghibaudi et al. 2023a). Moreover, in our experience on DCX+ cortical immature neuron detection in animal species endowed with widely different brain sizes, the highest numbers of these cells were found in the largest brains, namely in those tissues that are technically more difficult to be fixed and processed (Piumatti et al. 2018; La Rosa et al. 2020a). Finally, by using an in situ hybridization with RNA probe (RNAscope), absence of staining or non-specific staining for DCX was found to be frequent in human brain tissues treated with several antibodies, most of them being raised to work in mice (Ghibaudi et al. 2023a).
Age is another variable that can affect the rate of neurogenesis (Ben Abdallah et al. 2010; Semënov 2021), and animal species widely differ in their length of development and lifespan (Snyder 2019; Bonfanti and Charvet 2021). In other words, the species matters more than often acknowledged.
For obvious reasons linked to the scarce availability of well-fixed tissues for large-brained mammals, to the technical difficulties encountered in their analysis and related ethical issues, comparative studies encompassing multiple species are rare or limited to different rodents and mouse strains (van Dijk et al. 2019). Also, accurate longitudinal studies on the rate of cell division in the neurogenic sites at different ages are mostly limited to single species (mostly rodents; Ben Abdallah et al. 2010; Semënov 2021). This is due to the lack of reliable tools to trace the history and fate of the newly generated elements in vivo, through time, in animal species that are protected by ethical guidelines such as elephants, whales, great apes, and others. In addition, a common bias that has come to light in recent years consists of neuronal populations sharing the same markers of immaturity, e.g., DCX and PSA-NCAM: the newly generated neurons (produced in the process of stem cell-driven adult neurogenesis), and the “immature” neurons frozen in a state of arrested maturation (but having lost the capacity to undergo cell division; see La Rosa et al. 2020b, and below), the abovementioned markers being previously considered as specific markers for adult neurogenesis (Brown et al. 2003; see above). As an example, the detection of DCX+ neurons in the adult human dentate gyrus has been interpreted as adult neurogenesis (Moreno-Jiménez et al. 2019), even in the absence of substantial cell division (Sorrells et al. 2021), thus being rather ascribable to persistent immature neurons (Zhou et al. 2022).
Finally, considering that a substantial decrease in the genesis of new neurons does occur in all species with increasing ages, it is not always easy to establish a comparison between widely different mammals, due to their different neurodevelopmental schedules and maturational states (Workman et al. 2013; Bonfanti and Charvet 2021).
In summary, we are still far from reaching a complete and reliable, comparative mapping of adult neurogenesis occurrence, distribution and rate in widely different mammals (especially concerning the rate of cell division giving rise to the new neurons, with respect to the immaturity marker detection), although a general trend implying evolutionary trade-offs is starting to emerge.
Despite heterogeneity, a general trend of reduction in adult neurogenesis from small-brained to large-brained species is emerging
Although the comparative data on adult neurogenesis in mammals is incomplete and varied, the available evidence strongly suggests that this process may have undergone significant evolutionary changes across different phylogenetic groups. Our current knowledge regarding such variation is mainly qualitative, being based on: (i) observations provided by histological and immunocytochemical studies concerning the existence of morphological and molecular features typical of stem cell niches in the neurogenic sites (Sanai et al. 2011; Sorrells et al. 2018, 2021; Fig. 3), and (ii) a small number of quantitative studies of the rates of cell division (Fig. 3), with all the limits described above. An extreme example is represented by the dramatic drop in neurogenic activity within the olfactory system of some large-brained mammals (Fig. 4). Dolphins, which are large-brained, long-living aquatic mammals lacking a sense of smell, exhibit a vestigial and largely inactive subventricular zone (SVZ) at birth (Parolisi et al. 2017, 2018). This observation was obtained after careful analysis of 10 postmortem dolphin brains (5 neonates and 5 adults), by using internal positive controls for DCX and Ki-67 antigen in the highly proliferating external granule layer of the cerebellum (Parolisi et al. 2015, 2017). In humans, the SVZ substantially ceases to produce newly born neuroblasts for the olfactory bulb around two years of age (Sanai et al. 2011), which represents a relatively early stage in the human lifespan (Fig. 4).
The current controversy concerning the occurrence/rate of adult hippocampal neurogenesis in humans (Moreno-Jiménez et al. 2021; Sorrells et al. 2021), is raised by the contrast between the finding of DCX+ and PSA-NCAM+ neurons in the adult hippocampus (Mikkonen et al. 1998; Boldrini et al. 2018; Moreno-Jimenez et al., 2019; Tobin et al. 2019; Seki et al. 2019, 2020), in the absence of a morphologically-recognizable stem cell niche (Sorrells et al. 2018) and with very low levels of cell division (reported by most studies, though with different methods; see for example Sorrells et al. 2018; Cipriani et al. 2018; Moreno-Jimenez et al., 2019; Seki et al. 2019). This discrepancy has at present no clear explanation, yet, might be partially understood as a general trend for a higher occurrence of “immature” neurons in large-brained mammals (Palazzo et al. 2018; discussed in the next paragraph) and/or by possible processes of “dematuration” because of inflammation or pathological states in older adult individuals (Hagihara et al. 2019).
One of the recognized causes for age-related reduction is surely stem cell depletion, consisting of a mix of real, progressive exhaustion of the stem cell pool (reduction of the stem cell number; Encinas et al. 2011; Obernier et al., 2018) and entry in stem cell quiescence (Urbán et al. 2019). It has been proposed that similar mechanisms may limit neurogenesis to infancy in animals with very long lifespans, like humans (Obernier et al., 2018). In both neurogenic sites, with some differences in the slope of reduction between SVZ and hippocampus, a substantial genesis of new neurons is a juvenile event (Ben Abdallah et al. 2010; Semënov 2021), being influenced by lifespan extension and its impact on the timing of neurodevelopmental events across species (Snyder 2019; Charvet and Finlay 2018).
Phylogenetic variation in “immature” neurons
The topic of cortical immature neurons (cINs), along with the concept of “neurogenesis without division,” is relatively new, and thus, still not fully explored (Bonfanti and Seki 2021; Benedetti and Couillard-Despres, 2022). Many questions remain unanswered, among which are the molecular and cellular mechanisms that allow these neurons to halt their maturation before birth and subsequently “awaken” during adulthood. Also, their prevalence throughout the brain is not yet precisely known (Ghibaudi and Bonfanti 2022; Page et al. 2022), and it remains unclear whether they can be activated in response to injury, inflammation, or neurological disorders (excluding recent reports on subcortical, putative immature cell populations in macaques; Chareyron et al. 2021, discussed below). In parallel, some insight has been gained about the phylogenetic variation of cINs through systematic investigation of the cortex of different mammalian species widely varying in brain size, gyrencephaly and socioecological features, providing an unexpected twist in our understanding of comparative neuroplasticity (Piumatti et al. 2018; La Rosa et al. 2020a; Fig. 3C). Previous reports indicated that in laboratory rodents cINs are highly restricted to the piriform and entorhinal regions of the paleocortex (Seki and Arai 1991; Bonfanti et al. 1992; Nacher et al. 2001), though DCX+ neurons were also observed in the neocortex of some mammals, including guinea pigs, rabbits, and cats (Cai et al. 2009; Zhang et al. 2009; Varea et al. 2011; Luzzati et al. 2009; Xiong et al. 2008). In experiments using pregnant sheep treated with BrdU injections, with subsequent analysis of the lamb’s brains, we showed that most of the DCX+ neurons in the cerebral cortex (including neocortex), as well as some in subcortical regions (amygdala and claustrum), were generated prenatally, while still expressing markers for immaturity (Piumatti et al. 2018). Hence differences exist in the anatomical distribution of cINs among mammals, suggesting a more widespread presence in large-brained gyrencephalic species (Palazzo et al. 2018). Since most comparative studies on this subject were carried out on single animal species, by different laboratories, and using different methods of tissue processing and cell counting, we decided to perform a comparative study across mammals by addressing the occurrence, distribution, and amount of cINs in the whole cortical mantle (La Rosa et al. 2020a). In that study, 84 brains were processed by using the same method to identify and count the cortical layer II DCX+ cINs to obtain a linear density (number of cINs/mm of cortical layer II; Fig. 3C). The analysis revealed an extension of the presence of cINs from paleocortex in rodents to the entire neocortical mantle in gyrencephalic mammals (Fig. 5), with remarkable variation in cell density (one order of magnitude when comparing the group of small-brained species with large-brained ones; La Rosa et al. 2020a; Figs. 3, 4, 5). The presence of DCX+ cINs has been confirmed in the cerebral cortex of humans (Knoth et al. 2010; Liu et al. 2018; Sorrells et al. 2021; Coviello et al. 2022; Ghibaudi et al. 2023a; Li et al. 2023). Though systematic quantitative data in humans are not yet available (comparable cell density), it has been shown that these neurons cover layer II of the entire cortical mantle, being preserved at adult and old ages (Li et al. 2023). Thus, it appears that the cINs could grant a reservoir of young cells for the neocortex of large-brained species. For the highly complex cerebral cortices of these mammals, to rely on pre-existing neurons that can be added functionally throughout life might be an evolutionarily advantageous, energetically inexpensive solution for overcoming the lack of stem cells and progenitor cells (La Rosa and Bonfanti 2021). This aspect might also be linked to increased lifespans, since most large-brained mammals are also long-living with respect to mice. Interestingly, a prolonged maturation of the newlyborn neurons (up to 3–5 months) has been found in the naked mole rat, a rodent reaching thirty years of age and showing maturational features of large-brained, long-living mammals (Faykoo-Martinez et al. 2022).
Several reports indicate that “immature” neurons might exist in subcortical regions as well, also with significant interspecies variation (Chareyron et al. 2021; Ghibaudi and Bonfanti 2022; Page et al. 2022). For example, in a detailed study conducted on the human amygdala from embryogenesis to adulthood (Sorrells et al. 2019), an immature neuronal cell population (DCX+, PSA-NCAM+) that maintains a small size and a simple morphology for decades was found in the basolateral nucleus. The authors suggest that a portion of these cells undergo maturation as excitatory neurons (TBR1+/VGLUT2+), mainly during adolescence. Yet, some DCX+/PSANCAM+ cells persist even at older ages, in association with Ki67+ nuclei. These proliferating cells did not overlap with DCX+/PSANCAM+ cells, being primarily associated with blood vessels or oligodendrocytes (Sorrells et al. 2019). In contrast to the persistent presence of immature cells, the authors showed a sharp decline in the Ki67+ cells population in the first years of life.
The same research group recently studied the DCX+ cells of the amygdala in mice (only a few cells are detectable in the rodents studied to date), revealing that they can migrate to the piriform cortex at early postnatal stages, to add as glutamatergic excitatory neurons to the cINs already in place (Alderman et al. 2022). By using embryonic BrdU birth dating, this study confirms that immature neurons in the amygdala are generated prenatally, with results similar to those obtained by Gómez-Climent et al. (2008) for cINs, thus extending the concept of INs to subcortical regions. Though we still lack systematic comparative analyses, the data obtained in humans and mice indicate that subcortical immature neurons may also display interspecies variation.
Changes in the immature neuronal population of the amygdala have been described after bilateral hippocampal lesion in neonatal and adult monkeys (Macaca mulatta; Chareyron et al. 2016). The lesion-induced increase in the number of mature neurons in the amygdala has been interpreted as the product of different processes, including the maturation of resident immature cells, a migration of immature neurons from the paralaminar nucleus to other nuclei, or from a stream of neuroblasts originating in the SVZ (Bernier et al. 2002; Chareyron et al. 2016).
Overall, the amygdala of primates continues to undergo structural changes during essential formative years in the juvenile period and later in life, both in physiological and pathological conditions, mostly through maintenance of populations of immature excitatory neurons.
Hypotheses on a possible evolutionary trade-off between different types of neurogenic plasticity
Based on the evidence of phylogenetic variation in stem cell-driven neurogenesis and non-dividing “immature” neurons, it is likely that evolutionary pressures associated with ecological niche or neurodevelopmental constraints have led to the selection of different types of plasticity in various species and brain regions. This suggests a “trade-off”, which refers to a situation where compromise occurs between two or more traits that offer distinct benefits but cannot be fully optimized concurrently. Such compromises can arise due to limited resources or energy that must be allocated among competing demands, or due to anatomical or developmental limitations (Heldstab et al. 2022).
The concept of a trade-off implies that the balance of resource allocation can shift between different options without necessarily indicating an exclusive commitment to one over the other (Noordwijdk and Jong, 1986). Consequently, evolutionary processes might favor specific forms of plasticity in certain species or brain regions, depending on the ecological pressures and functional demands they face. We hypothesize that trade-offs play a crucial role in shaping the evolutionary trajectory of neural plasticity and contribute to the remarkable diversity observed across species. Here we propose that trade-offs can be observed in forms of neurogenic processes across mammal species between those that require or do not the presence of stem/progenitor cell division.
Brain size and balance in the allocation of resources
It is important to consider the factors that influence the occurrence of trade-offs in evolutionary biology. Limited resources, such as energy, nutrients, or developmental timing can pose constraints on an organism's ability to optimize multiple traits simultaneously. These constraints lead to the need to balance the allocation of resources so that one trait may come at the expense of another. For example, in the context of neurogenesis, maintaining a larger pool of stem cells for continuous regeneration may come at the cost of other energy-demanding processes, such as enhancing synaptic plasticity or cognitive functions (Walton et al. 2012).
Additionally, anatomical constraints can also contribute to trade-offs. The physical structure and organization of an organism's brain can impose limitations on the optimization of multiple traits. For instance, brain regions with limited space or specialized functions may prioritize specific forms of plasticity that are most beneficial for their ecological niche, while compromising on others (Charvet and Finlay 2018).
Nevertheless, it is important to note that evolution, as a process, is not linear, progressive, or predictable. While it operates through natural selection and the accumulation of advantageous traits over time, it also encompasses elements of randomness through neutral drift and contingent exceptions that defy straightforward explanations. The interplay of genetic variation, environmental factors, and chance events introduces a level of unpredictability (e.g., bats are small-brained mammals with reduced adult neurogenesis, or naked mole rats which are long-living rodents with abundant adult neurogenesis; Amrein et al. 2007; Penz et al. 2015). However, amid this complexity, certain trends and patterns can be identified. These trends are governed by the balance of energetic allocation and developmental constraints, ultimately shaping variation in brain structure across species and the capacity for different forms of plasticity.
In the case of neurogenic plasticity, the following variables are relevant: (i) the type of plasticity (e.g., stem cell-driven neurogenesis and non-dividing immature neurons); (ii) the anatomical region hosting plasticity that is linked to specific functions (e.g., canonical neurogenic site linked to olfaction and cerebral cortex linked to high-order computational capabilities); (iii) the phylogenetic lineage of the species and their brain size.
Adult neurogenesis in large mammal brains is subject to various energetic costs and developmental constraints. The biosynthetic process of generating new neurons requires substantial metabolic resources, including glucose and oxygen, which can impose a significant burden on the energy budget of the brain (Bauernfeind and Babbitt 2020). Large mammal brains may face challenges in allocating sufficient resources for neurogenesis while maintaining other essential functions. Additionally, the developmental constraints associated with large brain size can limit the spatial and temporal availability of neurogenic niches, where new neurons are generated (Patzke et al. 2015; Charvet and Finlay 2018; Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2018; Duque and Spector 2019). This may restrict the extent and duration of adult neurogenesis in large mammals.
By contrast, the prenatally generated, non-dividing cortical “immature” neurons, which do not require stem/progenitor cells to occur as undifferentiated elements within the mature cortex, are far more abundant and widespread in large-brained mammals (La Rosa et al. 2020a; Fig. 6), likely representing a “low energy cost”, alternative form of neurogenic plasticity. For instance, it has been shown that virtually all the cINs eventually awaken and pursue their fate to functional integration across the animal lifespan (Benedetti et al., 2023). On the other hand, it is well known that at least 60% of the cells produced in canonical adult neurogenesis will die by apoptosis during the first week after division, and others will be selectively lost while trying to reach their target (Sierra et al. 2010; Pilz et al. 2018), so that only a few cells will eventually integrate. In addition, the cINs are already in place within their destination (layer II) since the last phases of embryogenesis, hence not needing migration, and are ensheated by astrocytic lamellae, having only a few or no synapses (Gomez-Climent et al., 2008). Of course, it is far from clear how these cells can survive apparently isolated from the surrounding neuropil, yet these features might represent an advantageous source for providing new neurons to locations across the entire cortical surface, in the absence of active stem cell niches.
From olfaction to neocortex: the hypothesis of navigation adapted to plasticity
Recent theories propose that the origin of the neocortex in early mammals resulted from behavioral adaptations related to olfaction-mediated goal-directed and navigational behaviors, accompanied by integrated sensory map development, which in turn resulted in developmental changes in the distribution of cells and the formation of circuits in the telencephalon (Aboitiz et al. 2003; Aboitiz and Montiel 2015). Early mammals likely adopted a nocturnal and burrowing lifestyle, utilizing internal cues such as proprioceptive information in conjunction with sensory inputs from the olfactory and somatosensory systems for spatial navigation. In such conditions, orientation was predominantly based on one-dimensional maps that encoded sequences of events in a time series. These early mammals are thought to have relied heavily on their sense of smell, leading to an expansion of the olfactory bulb and olfactory cortex as brain size increased. Accordingly, selective pressures led to the emergence of an interface between olfactory-hippocampal networks, integrating somatosensory information for navigation (Kaas 2019).
As mammals diversified and occupied new ecological niches, including diurnal environments for some species, vision and audition provided additional information regarding distance and location. These senses are vital for generating accurate two-dimensional and time-independent spatial maps, providing more detailed information relevant to navigation (Buzsáki 2005; Eichenbaum 2014). Over time, the expanding neocortex played an increasingly prominent role in the formation of multimodal association networks and map-like representations of space (Aboitiz and Montiel 2015).
The current diversity of brain structure in mammals is extraordinary. Large-brained mammals with gyrencephalic brains often exhibit reduced olfactory bulb size or complete absence of olfactory bulbs, as observed in dolphins (Fig. 5; references in Parolisi et al. 2018). In contrast, smaller-brained mammals, including most rodents, possess prominent olfactory structures and relatively smooth neocortices. In these species, the activity of the periventricular neurogenic niche (SVZ) is impressive, providing thousands of new neurons/day for the olfactory bulb through the animal lifespan, and allowing experience-induced plasticity linked to olfaction (Lim and Alvarez-Buylla 2016; Lledo and Valley 2016; Fig. 4). By contrast, the SVZ neurogenic niche of humans is exhausted at very early postnatal stages, then leaving only a vestigial remnant (Sanai et al. 2011; Fig. 4). This anatomical variation reflects functional adaptations, with rodents heavily relying on olfaction, while larger mammals exploit the computational capabilities of their expanded neocortical circuits. The neocortex, characterized by six layers, undergoes remarkable elaboration in large-brained mammals with greater differentiation of specialized cortical fields that are important for sensorimotor integration and cognitive functions (Englund and Krubitzer 2022). Large-brained species with highly folded neocortices, such as primates, exhibit reduced dependence on olfaction, with their behavioral complexity predominantly linked to an extensively expanded neocortical mantle. This difference in reliance on olfaction and neocortical development could explain the lower levels of neurogenesis observed in these species, which primarily occur during the postnatal and juvenile stages to shape neural circuits through experiential learning (Semënov 2019; Kempermann 2019; Cushman et al. 2021). Consequently, a possible adaptation in large-brained, long-living mammals is the selection of non-dividing immature neurons (cINs) as a mechanism to provide a form of neurogenic plasticity in layer II of the cerebral cortex (as discussed in La Rosa et al. 2020a). This alternative mechanism for structural plasticity in highly expanded neocortices may serve an especially important functional role for species that lack abundance of active stem cells in the neurogenic sites, and may contribute to maintain neotenic features in brains with extended lifespans.
In considering the evolutionary reasons for the prevalence of diverse neurogenic processes, numerous questions arise regarding the role, mechanisms, and connectivity associated with plasticity linked to cINs. First, the observation that small-brained mammals exhibit this characteristic primarily in specific limbic areas, while other regions such as the sensory, motor, and association cortex lack it, suggests that a reservoir of cINs might not be a necessary supplement to synaptic plasticity in neocortical regions of these species. On the other hand, the existence of dormant neurons might have a role in large brains with expanded neocortices since the number of these cells is considerably greater than in small-brained rodents (see estimations below). Yet, the question arises: does the incorporation of a small number of new neurons over several years of an organism’s lifespan yield a significant functional benefit? The answer may involve a trade-off, as the number of dormant cINs significantly increases in larger brains with expanded neocortices, such as those in chimpanzees compared to rodents. For instance, the total number of cINs has been estimated at 36,000 (18,000 per hemisphere) in three-month-old mice (Ghibaudi et al. 2023b), whereas it reaches approximately 5 million (2.5 million per hemisphere) in chimpanzees (La Rosa et al. 2020a, b), representing a two-order-of-magnitude difference. Although the total number of cortical neurons has been estimated to be 5–7 million/hemisphere in mice (Herculano-Houzel et al. 2006), and 3, 7 billion/hemisphere in chimpanzees (Collins et al. 2016), namely a difference of three orders of magnitude, the difference in cIN density in the neocortex of mouse and chimpanzee is even more striking, with a five orders of magnitude increase in chimpanzees (La Rosa et al. 2020a). Despite an evident interspecies difference, whether adding a few cells for every thousands of existing neurons during the course of a lifetime can make a functional difference remains far from clear.
A third unresolved question pertains which connections these neurons might establish. It's worth noting that these immature neurons are found in layer II, a region considered to have a role in furnishing corticocortical association projections (and association with respect to other cortical layers), which may make it an ideal location for a neurogenesis-like process within the structurally stable cerebral cortex (La Rosa et al. 2020a). How these neurons orchestrate long-range axonal growth to reach their targets is a topic that requires further study.
Lastly, our current understanding of subcortical immature neurons strongly suggests that their numbers only moderately decline with age in gyrencephalic large-brained species, maintaining a substantial pool of immature cells (like a sort of neoteny) even in advanced life stages. This phenomenon has been observed in sheep (Piumatti et al. 2018) and humans (Sorrells et al. 2019) and has been discussed in Ghibaudi et al. (2023b). This observation raises intriguing hypotheses about the functional role of immature neurons, which may not solely rely on their structural integration. It’s possible that not all these neurons become active; some may remain immature and exert paracrine effects, such as trophic, neuroprotective, or bystander influences, on mature neural networks.
The presence of a trade-off between stem cell-driven neurogenesis and immature, dormant cINs in favor of the latter in gyrencephalic, long-lived mammals calls for further fundamental and comparative research. This research should aim to comprehensively elucidate all aspects of this fascinating mechanism in brain plasticity, holding significant translational implications.
Conclusions
Biomedical research, including the neurosciences, is largely conducted on laboratory animal models, mostly mice and rats (Brenowitz and Zakon 2015; Bolker 2012, 2017; Faykoo-Martinez et al. 2017; La Rosa and Bonfanti 2018; Cozzi et al. 2020). Comparative studies using different mammalian species represent a small fraction of current research, although interest in the neurobiology of non-rodent mammals, including large-brained species and humans, has been increasing. One of the reasons surely is due to recent findings highlighting remarkable interspecies differences in the occurrence, extension, and rate of neural plastic processes (this review article). Comparative studies can help us to better understand the possible trade-offs that occur during evolution between different types of plasticity, thus providing a more comprehensive picture of these processes in mammals to avoid confusion and misinterpretation coming from the exclusive use of rodents as animal models (Lipp and Bonfanti 2016; Faykoo-Martinez et al. 2017). Do these differences have consequences for cognition, learning, capacity to recover from injury, or some other function? According to Jessica Bolker (2012) “disparities between mice and humans may help to explain why the millions of dollars spent on basic research have yielded frustratingly few clinical advances”. Now we know that disparities between reparative and physiological (homeostatic) plasticity, as well as between adult neurogenesis and “immature” (dormant) neurons, may contribute to explain these difficulties in translation.
Whatever the evolutionary reason, the differences in brain structural plasticity among animal species do exist, are remarkable, and indicate a gain in widespread adaptive plasticity at the expenses of loss in reparative and regenerative capability. This diversity may potentially frustrate therapeutic translation from animal models, but there is reason to be optimistic that the comparative perspective will bring exciting breakthroughs in our understanding of the role of plasticity in driving postnatal brain development and maintaining a healthy and efficient brain throughout life.
Data availability
Enquiries about data availability should be directed to the authors.
References
Aboitiz F, Montiel JF (2015) Olfaction, navigation, and the origin of isocortex. Front Neurosci 9:402
Aboitiz F, Morales D, Montiel J (2003) The evolutionary origin of the mammalian isocortex: towards an integrated developmental and functional approach. Behav Brain Sci 26:535–552
Acheson A, Sunshine J, Rutishauser U (1991) NCAM polysialic acid can regulate both cell–cell and cell–substrate interactions. J Cell Biol 114:143–153
Aimone JB, Li Y, Lee SW, Clemenson GD, Deng W, Gage FH (2014) Regulation and function of adult neurogenesis: from genes to cognition. Physiol Rev 94(4):991–1026
Alderman PJ, Saxon D, Torrijos-Saiz LI, Sharief M, Biagiotti SW, Page CE, Melamed A, Kuo CT, Garcia-Verdugo J-M, Herranz-Perez V et al (2022) Mouse paralaminar amygdala excitatory neurons migrate and mature during adolescence. BioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.09.23.509244
Alonso-Nanclares L, Rodríguez JR, Merchan-Perez A, González-Soriano J, Plaza-Alonso S, Cano-Astorga N, Naumann RK, Brecht M, DeFelipe J (2022) Cortical synapses of the world’s smallest mammal: an FIB/SEM study in the Etruscan shrew. J Comp Neurol 531(3):390–414
Altman J, Das GD (1965) Post-natal origin of microneurones in the rat brain. Nature 207:953–956
Amrein I (2015) Adult hippocampal neurogenesis in natural populations of mammals. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 7:a021295
Amrein I, Dechmann DK, Winter Y, Lipp HP (2007) Absent or low rate of adult neurogenesis in the hippocampus of bats (Chiroptera). PLoS ONE 2:e455
Bao H, Song J (2018) Treating brain disorders by targeting adult neural stem cells. Trends Mol Med 24(12):991–1006
Barker JM, Boonstra R, Wojtowicz JM (2011) From pattern to purpose: How comparative studies contribute to understanding the function of adult neurogenesis. Eur J Neurosci 34:963–977
Bauernfeind AL, Babbitt CC (2020) Metabolic changes in human brain evolution. Evol Anthropol 29:201–211
Ben Abdallah NM, Slomianka L, Vyssotski AL, Lipp HP (2010) Early age-related changes in adult hippocampal neurogenesis in C57 mice. Neurobiol Aging 31:151–161
Benedetti B, Couillard-Després S (2022) Why would the brain need dormant neuronal precursors? Front Neurosci 16:877167
Benedetti B, Dannehl D, König R, Coviello S, Kreutzer C, Zaunmair P, Jakubecova D, Weiger TM, Aigner L, Nacher J, Engelhardt M, Couillard-Després S (2020) Functional integration of neuronal precursors in the adult murine piriform cortex. Cereb Cortex 30(3):1499–1515
Benedetti B, Reisinger M, Hochwartner M, Gabriele G, Jakubecova D, Benedetti A, Bonfanti L, Couillard-Despres S (2023) The awakening of dormant neuronal precursors in the adult and aged brain. Aging Cell (ePub) 00:e13974
Bernier P, Bedard A, Vinet J, Lavesque M, Parent A (2002) Newly generated neurons in the amygdala and adjoining cortex of adult primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:11464–11469
Boldrini M, Fulmore CA, Tartt AN, Simeon LR, Pavlova I, Poposka V (2018) Human hippocampal neurogenesis persists throughout aging. Cell Stem Cell 22:589–599
Bolker JA (2012) There’s more to life than rats and flies. Nature 491:31–33
Bolker JA (2017) Animal models in translational research: rosetta stone or stumbling block? Bioessays 39(12):1–8
Bond AM, Ming G, Song H (2015) Adult mammalian neural stem cells and neurogenesis: five decades later. Cell Stem Cell 17:385–395
Bonfanti L (2006) PSA-NCAM in mammalian structural plasticity and neurogenesis. Prog Neurobiol 80:129–164
Bonfanti L (2011) From hydra regeneration to human brain structural plasticity: a long trip through narrowing roads. Sci World J 11:1270–1299
Bonfanti L, Charvet CJ (2021) Brain plasticity in humans and model systems: advances, challenges, and future directions. Int J Mol Sci 22:9358
Bonfanti L, Nacher J (2012) New scenarios for neuronal structural plasticity in non-neurogenic brain parenchyma: the case of cortical layer II immature neurons. Prog Neurobiol 98:1–15
Bonfanti L, Seki T (2021) The PSA-NCAM-positive “immature” neurons: an old discovery providingnew vistas on brain structural plasticity. Cells 10:2542
Bonfanti L, Olive S, Poulain DA, Theodosis DT (1992) Mapping of the distribution of polysialylated neural cell adhesion molecule throughout the central nervous system of the adult rat: an immunohistochemical study. Neuroscience 49:419–436
Brenowitz EA, Zakon HH (2015) Emerging from the bottleneck: benefits of the comparative approach to modern neuroscience. Trends Neurosci 38(5):273–278
Brown JP, Couillard-Despres S, Cooper-Kuhn CM, Winkler J, Aigner L, Kuhn HG (2003) Transient expression of doublecortin during adult neurogenesis. J Comp Neurol 467:1–10
Buzsáki G (2005) Theta rhythm of navigation: link between path integration and landmark navigation, episodic and semantic memory. Hippocampus 15:827–840
Cai Y, Xiong K, Chu Y, Luo DW, Luo XG, Yuan XY, Struble RG, Clough RW, Spencer DD, Williamson A et al (2009) Doublecortin expression in adult cat and primate cerebral cortex relates to immature neurons that develop into GABAergic subgroups. Exp Neurol 216:342–356
Chareyron LJ, Amaral DG, Lavenex P (2016) Selective lesion of the hippocampus increases the differentiation of immature neurons in the monkey amygdala. PNAS 113:14420–14425
Chareyron LJ, Banta Lavenex P, Amaral DG, Lavenex P (2021) Life and death of immature neurons in the juvenile and adult primate amygdala. Int J Mol Sci 22:6691
Charvet CJ, Finlay BL (2018) Comparing adult hippocampal neurogenesis across species: Translating time to predict the tempo in humans. Front Neurosci 12:706
Cipriani S, Ferrer A, Arinica I, Kovacs G, Verney C et al (2018) Hippocampal radial glial subtypes and their neurogenic potential in human fetuses and healthy and Alzheimer disease adults. Cereb Cortex 28:2458–2478
Citri A, Malenka RC (2008) Synaptic plasticity: multiple forms, functions, and mechanisms. Neuropsychopharmacology 33(1):18–41
Collins CE, Turner EC, Sawyer EK, Reed JL, Young NA, Flaherty DK, Kaas JH (2016) Cortical cell and neuron density estimates in one chimpanzee hemisphere. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:740–745
Coviello S, Gramuntell Y, Klimczak P, Varea E, Blasco-Ibañez JM, Crespo C, Gutierrez A, Nacher J (2022) Phenotype and distribution of immature neurons in the human cerebral cortex layer II. Front Neuroanat 16:851432
Cozzi B, Bonfanti L, Canali E, Minero M (2020) Brain waste: the neglect of animal brains. Front Neuroanat 14:573934
Cushman JD, Drew MR, Krasne FB (2021) The environmental sculpting hypothesis of juvenile and adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Prog Neurobiol 199:101961
De Felipe J, Alonso-Nanclares L, Arellano JI (2002) Microstructure of the neocortex: comparative aspects. J Neurocytol 31(3–5):299–316
Duque A, Spector R (2019) A balanced evaluation of the evidence for adult neurogenesis in humans: implication for neuropsychiatric disorders. Brain Struct Funct 224:2281–2295
Duque A, Arellano JI, Rakic P (2022) An assessment of the existence of adult neurogenesis in humans and value of its rodent models for neuropsychiatric diseases. Mol Psychiatr 27(1):377–382
Eichenbaum H (2014) Time cells in the hippocampus: a new dimension for mapping memories. Nat Rev Neurosci 15:732–744
Encinas JM, Michurina TV, Peunova N, Park J-H, Tordo J, Peterson DA, Fishell G, Koulakov A, Enikolopov G (2011) Division-coupled astrocytic differentiation and age-related depletion of neural stem cells in the adult hippocampus. Cell Stem Cell 8:566–579
Englund M, Krubitzer L (2022) Phenotypic alterations in cortical organization and connectivity across different time scales. Brain Behav Evol 97:108–120
Faykoo-Martinez M, Toor I, Holmes MM (2017) Solving the neurogenesis puzzle: looking for pieces outside the traditional box. Front Neurosci 11:505
Faykoo-Martinez M, Collins T, Peragine D, Malik M, Javed F, Kolisnyk M et al (2022) Protracted neuronal maturation in a long-lived, highly social rodent. PLoS ONE 17(9):e0273098
Feliciano DM, Bordey A, Bonfanti L (2015) Noncanonical sites of adult neurogenesis in the mammalian brain. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 7:a018846
Finlay BL, Darlington RB (1995) Linked regularities in the development and evolution of mammalian brains. Science 268:1578–1584
Fudge JL (2004) Bcl-2 immunoreactive neurons are differentially distributed in subregions of the amygdala and hippocampus of the adult macaque. Neuroscience 127:539–556
Gage FH (2019) Adult neurogenesis in mammals. Science 364(6443):827–828
Ghibaudi M, Bonfanti L (2022) How widespread are the “young” neurons of the mammalian brain? Front Neurosci 16:918616
Ghibaudi M, Amenta A, Agosti M, Riva M, Graïc J-M, Bifari F, Bonfanti L (2023a) Consistency and variation in doublecortin and Ki67 antigen detection in the brain tissue of different mammals, including humans. Int J Mol Sci 24:2514
Ghibaudi M, Marchetti N, Vergnano E, La Rosa C, Benedetti B, Couillard-Despres S, Farioli-Vecchioli S, Bonfanti L (2023b) Age-related changes in layer II immature neurons of the murine piriform cortex. Front Cell Neurosci 17:1205173
Gómez-Climent MA, Castillo-Gómez E, Varea E, Guirado R, Blasco-Ibáñez JM, Crespo C, Martínez-Guijarro FJ, Nácher J (2008) A population of prenatally generated cells in the rat paleocortex maintains an immature neuronal phenotype into adulthood. Cereb Cortex 18:2229–2240
Hagihara H, Murano T, Ohira K, Miwa M, Nakamura K, Miyakawa T (2019) Expression of progenitor cell/immature neuron markers does not present definitive evidence for adult neurogenesis. Mol Brain 12:108
Hao Z-Z, Wei J-R, Xiao D, Liu R, Xu N, Tang L, Huang M, Shen Y, Xing C, Huang W, Liu X, Xiang M, Liu Y, Miao Z, Liu S (2022) Single-cell transcriptomic of adult macaque hippocampus reveals neural precursor cell populations. Nat Neurosci 25(6):805–817
Heldstab SA, Isler K, Graber SM, Schuppli C, van Schaik CP (2022) The economics of brain size evolution in vertebrates. Curr Biol 32(12):R697–R708
Herculano-Houzel S, Mota B, Lent R (2006) Cellular scaling rules for rodent brains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(1):2138–12143
Holtmaat A, Svoboda K (2009) Experience-dependent structural synaptic plasticity in the mammalian brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 10(9):647–658
Jhaveri D, Tedoldi A, Hunt S, Sullivan R, Watts N, Power J et al (2018) Evidence for newly generated interneurons in the basolateral amygdala of adult mice. Mol Psychiatr 23:521–532
Kaas JH (2019) The origin and evolution of neocortex: from early mammals to modern humans. Prog Brain Res 250:61–81
Kempermann G (2019) Environmental enrichment, new neurons and the neurobiology of individuality. Nat Rev Neurosci 20(4):235–245
Klempin F, Kronenberg G, Cheung G, Kettenmann H, Kempermann G (2011) Properties of doublecortin-(DCX)-expressing cells in the piriform cortex compared to the neurogenic dentate gyrus of adult mice. PLoS ONE 6:e25760
Knoth R, Singec I, Ditter M, Pantazis G, Capetian P, Meyer RP, Horvat V, Volk B, Kempermann G (2010) Murine features of neurogenesis in the human hippocampus across the lifespan from 0 to 100 years. PLoS ONE 5(1):e8809
König R, Benedetti B, Rotheneichner P, O′Sullivan A, Kreutzer C, Belles M, Nacher J, Weiger TM, Aigner L, Couillard-Després S, (2016) Distribution and fate of DCX/PSA-NCAM expressing cells in the adult mammalian cortex: a local reservoir for adult cortical neuroplasticity? Front Biol 11:193–213
La Rosa C, Bonfanti L (2018) Brain plasticity in mammals: an example for the role of comparative medicine in the neurosciences. Front Vet Sci 5:274
La Rosa C, Bonfanti L (2021) Searching for alternatives to brain regeneration. Neural Reg Res 16(11):2198–2199
La Rosa C, Ghibaudi M, Bonfanti L (2019) Newly generated and non-newly generated “immature” neurons in the mammalian brain: a possible reservoir of young cells to prevent brain ageing and disease? J Clin Med 8:685
La Rosa C, Cavallo F, Pecora A, Chincarini M, Ala U, Faulkes CG, Nacher J, Cozzi B, Sherwood CC, Amrein I, Bonfanti L (2020a) Phylogenetic variation in cortical layer II immature neuron reservoir of mammals. Elife 9:e55456
La Rosa C, Parolisi R, Bonfanti L (2020b) Brain structural plasticity: from adult neurogenesis to immature neurons. Front Neurosci 14:75
Lange C, Brand M (2020) Vertebrate brain regeneration—a community effort of fate-restricted precursor cell types. Curr Op Gen Dev 64:101–108
Li Y-N, Hu D-D, Cai X-L, Wang Y, Yang C, Jiang J, Zhang Q-L, Tu T, Wang X-S, Wang H et al (2023) Doublecortin expressing neurons in human cerebral cortex layer II and amygdala from infancy to 100 year-old. Mol Neurobiol 60(6):3464–3485
Lim DA, Alvarez-Buylla A (2016) The adult ventricular-subventricular zone (V-SVZ) and olfactory bulb (OB) neurogenesis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 8:a018820
Lindsey BW, Hall ZJ, Heuzé A, Joly JS, Tropepe V, Kaslin J (2018) The role of neuro-epithelial and radial-glial stem and progenitor cells in development, plasticity, and repair. Prog Neurobiol 170:99–114
Lipp HP, Bonfanti L (2016) Adult neurogenesis in mammals: variations and confusions. Brain Behav Evol 87:205–221
Liu JYW, Matarin M, Reeves C, McEvoy AW, Miserocchi A, Thompson P, Sisodiya SM, Thom M (2018) Doublecortin-expressing cell types in temporal lobe epilepsy. Acta Neuropathol Commun 6:60
Lledo PM, Valley M (2016) Adult olfactory bulb neurogenesis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 8(8):a018945
Lois C, Alvarez-Buylla A (1994) Long-distance neuronal migration in the adult mammalian brain. Science 264:1145–1148
Luzzati F, De Marchis S, Fasolo A, Peretto P (2006) Neurogenesis in the caudate nucleus of the adult rabbit. J Neurosci 26:609–621
Luzzati F, Bonfanti L, Fasolo A, Peretto P (2009) DCX and PSA-NCAM expression identifies a population of neurons preferentially distributed in associative areas of different pallial derivatives and vertebrate species. Cereb Cortex 19:1028–1041
Marlatt MW, Philippens I, Manders E, Czéh B, Marian Joels M, Harm Krugers H et al (2011) Distinct structural plasticity in the hippocampus and amygdala of the middle-aged common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). Exp Neurol 230:291–301
Martí-Mengual U, Varea E, Crespo C, Blasco-Ibáñez JM, Nacher J (2013) Cells expressing markers of immature neurons in the amygdala of adult humans. Eur J Neurosci 37:10–22
Martínez-Cerdeno V, García-Moreno F, Tosches MA, Csillag A, Manger PR, Molnár Z (2018) Update on forebrain evolution: from neurogenesis to thermogenesis. Semin Cell Dev Biol 76:15–22
Martino G, Pluchino S, Bonfanti L, Schwartz M (2011) Brain regeneration in physiology and pathology: the immune signature driving therapeutic plasticity of neural stem cells. Phys Rev 91:1281–1304
Mikkonen M, Soininen BM, Kalviainen R, Tapiola T, Ylinen A, Vapalahti M, Paljarvi L, Pitkanen A (1998) Remodeling of neuronal circuitries in human temporal lobe epilepsy: increased expression of highly polysialylated neural cell adhesion molecule in the hippocampus and the entorhinal cortex. Ann Neurol 44:923–934
Moreno-Jimenéz EP, Flor-Garcia M, Terreros-Roncal J, Rabano A, Cafini F, Pallas-Bazarra N, Avila J, Llorens-Martin M (2019) Adult hippocampal neurogenesis is abundant in neurologically healthy subjects and drops sharply in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Med 25:554–560
Moreno-Jiménez EP, Terreros-Roncal J, Flor-García M, Rábano A, Llorens-Martín M (2021) Evidences for adult hippocampal neurogenesis in humans. J Neurosci 41:2541–2553
Nacher J, Bonfanti L (2015) New neurons from old beliefs in the adult piriform cortex? A Commentary on: “occurrence of new neurons in the piriform cortex.” Front Neuroanat 9:62
Nacher J, Crespo C, McEwen BS (2001) Doublecortin expression in the adult rat telencephalon. Eur J Neurosci 14(4):629–644
Obernier K, Alvarez-Buylla A (2019) Neural stem cells: origin, heterogeneity and regulation in the adult mammalian brain. Development 146(4):156059
Obernier K, Cebrian-Silla A, Thomson M, Parraguez JI, Anderson R, Guinto C, Rodriguez JR, Garcia-Verdugo J-M, Alvarez-Buylla A (2018) Adult neurogenesis is sustained by symmetric self-renewal and differentiation. Cell Stem Cell 22:221–234
Oppenheim RW (2019) Adult hippocampal neurogenesis in mammals (and humans): the death of a central dogma in neuroscience and its replacement by a new dogma. Dev Neurobiol 79:268–280
Page CE, Biagiotti SW, Alderman PJ, Sorrells SF (2022) Immature excitatory neurons in the amygdala come of age during puberty. Dev Cogn Neurosci 56:101133
Palazzo O, La Rosa C, Piumatti M, Bonfanti L (2018) Do large brains of long-living mammals prefer non-newly generated, immature neurons? Neural Regen Res 13:633–634
Paredes MF, Sorrells SF, Garcia-Verdugo JM, Alvarez-Buylla A (2016) Brain size and limits to adult neurogenesis. J Comp Neurol 524:646–664
Parolisi R, Peruffo A, Messina S, Panin M, Montelli S, Giurisato M, Cozzi B, Bonfanti L (2015) Forebrain neuroanatomy of the neonatal and juvenile dolphin (T. truncatus and S. coeruloalba). Front Neuroanat 9:140
Parolisi R, Cozzi B, Bonfanti L (2017) Non-neurogenic SVZ-like niche in dolphins, mammals devoid of olfaction. Brain Struct Funct 222:2625–2639
Parolisi R, Cozzi B, Bonfanti L (2018) Humans and dolphins: decline and fall of adult neurogenesis. Front Neurosci 12:497
Patzke N, Spocter MA, Karlsson KÆ, Bertelsen MF, Haagensen M, Chawana R, Streicher S, Kaswera C, Gilissen E, Alagaili AN, Mohammed OB, Reep RL, Bennett NC, Siegel JM, Ihunwo AO, Manger PR (2015) In contrast to many other mammals, cetaceans have relatively small hippocampi that appear to lack adult neurogenesis. Brain Struct Funct 220:361–383
Penz OK, Fuzik J, Kurek AB, Romanov R, Larson J, Park TJ, Harkany T, Keimpema E (2015) Protracted brain development in a rodent model of extreme longevity. Sci Rep 5:11592
Pilz G-A, Bottes S, Betizeau M, Jörg DJ, Carta S, April S, Simons BD, Helmchen F, Jessberger S (2018) Live imaging of neurogenesis in the adult mouse hippocampus. Science 359:658–662
Piumatti M, Palazzo O, La Rosa C, Crociara P, Parolisi R, Luzzati F, Lévy F, Bonfanti L (2018) Non-newly generated, “immature” neurons in the sheep brain are not restricted to cerebral cortex. J Neurosci 38:826–842
Ponti G, Peretto P, Bonfanti L (2006) A subpial, transitory germinal zone forms chains of neuronal precursors in the rabbit cerebellum. Dev Biol 294(1):168–180
Ponti G, Peretto P, Bonfanti L (2008) Genesis of neuronal and glial progenitors in the cerebellar cortex of peripuberal and adult rabbits. PLoS ONE 3(6):e2366
Ponti G, Crociara P, Armentano M, Bonfanti L (2010) Adult neurogenesis without germinal layers: the “atypical” cerebellum of rabbits. Arch Ital Biol 148(2):147–158
Preuss TM (2019) Critique of pure marmoset. Brain Behav Evol 93:92–107
Rotheneichner P, Belles M, Benedetti B, König R, Dannehl D, Kreutzer C, Zaunmair P, Engelhardt M, Aigner L, Nacher J, Couillard-Despres S (2018) Cellular plasticity in the adult murine piriform cortex: continuous maturation of dormant precursors into excitatory neurons. Cereb Cortex 28:2610–2621
Sanai N, Nguyen T, Ihrie RA, Mirzadeh Z, Tsai H-H, Wong M, Gupta N, Berger MS, Huang E, Garcia-Verdugo JM, Rowitch DH, Alvarez-Buylla A (2011) Corridors of migrating neurons in the human brain and their decline during infancy. Nature 478:382–386
Seki T (2020) Understanding the real state of human adult hippocampal neurogenesis from studies of rodents and non-human primates. Front Neurosci 14:839
Seki T, Arai Y (1991) Expression of highly polysialylated NCAM in the neocortex and piriform cortex of the developing and the adult rat. Anat Embryol (berl) 184:395–401
Seki T, Hori T, Miyata H, Maehara M, Namba T (2019) Analysis of proliferating neuronal progenitors and immature neurons in the human hippocampus surgically removed from control and epileptic patients. Sci Rep 9:18194
Semënov MV (2019) Adult hippocampal neurogenesis is a developmental process involved in cognitive development. Front Neurosci 13:159
Semënov MV (2021) Proliferative capacity of adult mouse brain. Int J Mol Sci 22:3449
Sherwood CC, Miller SB, Molly M, Stimpson CD, Phillips KA, Jacobs B, Hof PR, Raghanti MA, Smaers JB (2020) Invariant synapse density and neuronal connectivity scaling in primate neocortical evolution. Cereb Cortex 30:5604–5615
Sierra A, Encinas JM, Deudero JJP, Chancey JH, Enikolopov G, Overstreet-Wadiche LS, Tsirka SE, Maletic-Savatic M (2010) Microglia shape adult hippocampal neurogenesis through apoptosis-coupled phagocytosis. Cell Stem Cell 7(4):483–495
Snyder JS (2019) Recalibrating the relevance of adult neurogenesis. Trends Neurosci 42:164–178
Sorrells SF, Paredes MF, Cebrian-Silla A, Sandoval K, Qi D, Kelley KW et al (2018) Human hippocampal neurogenesis drops sharply in children to undetectable levels in adults. Nature 555:377–381
Sorrells SF, Paredes MF, Velmeshev D, Herranz-Pérez V, Sandoval K, Mayer S, Chang EF, Insausti R, Kriegstein AR, Rubenstein JL, Garcia-Verdugo JM, Huang EJ, Alvarez-Buylla A (2019) Immature excitatory neurons develop during adolescence in the human amygdala. Nat Commun 10(1):2748
Sorrells SF, Paredes MF, Zhang Z, Kang G, Pastor-Alonso O, Biagiotti S, Page CE, Sandoval K, Knox A, Connolly A et al (2021) Positive controls in adults and children support that very few, if any, new neurons are born in the adult human hippocampus. J Neurosci 41:2554–2565
Tardif SD, Mansfield KG, Ratnam R, Ross CN, Ziegler TE (2011) The marmoset as a model of aging and age-related diseases. ILAR J 52(1):54–65
Tobin MK, Musaraca K, Disouky A, Shetti A, Bheri A, Honer WG, Kim N, Dawe RJ, Bennett DA, Arfanakis K et al (2019) Human hippocampal neurogenesis persists in aged adults and Alzheimer’s disease patients. Cell Stem Cell 24:974-982.e3
Urbán N, Blomfield IM, Guillemot F (2019) Quiescence of adult mammalian neural stem cells: a highly regulated rest. Neuron 104:834–848
van Noordwijdk AJ, Jong G (1986) Acquisition and allocation of resources: their influence on variation in life history tactics. Am Nat 128:137–142
van Dijk RM, Wiget F, Wolfer DP, Slomianka L, Amrein I (2019) Consistent within-group covariance of septal and temporal hippocampal neurogenesis with behavioral phenotypes for exploration and memory retention across wild and laboratory small rodents. Behav Brain Res 372:112034
Vandestadt C, Vanwalleghem GC, Khabooshan MA, Douek AM, Castillo HA, Li M, Schulze K, Don E, Stamatis SA, Ratnadiwakara M, Änkö ML, Scott EK, Kaslin J (2021) RNA-induced inflammation and migration of precursor neurons initiates neuronal circuit regeneration in zebrafish. Dev Cell 56(16):2364-2380.e8
Varea E, Belles M, Vidueira S, Blasco-Ibáñez JM, Crespo C, Pastor ÁM, Nacher J (2011) PSA-NCAM is expressed in immature, but not recently generated, neurons in the adult cat cerebral cortex layer II. Front Neurosci 5:17
Walton NM, Shin R, Tajinda K, Heusner CL, Kogan JH, Miyake S, Chen Q, Tamura K, Matsumoto M (2012) Adult neurogenesis transiently generates oxidative stress. PLoS ONE 7(4):e35264
Weil ZM, Norman GJ, DeVries AC, Nelson RJ (2008) The injured nervous system: a Darwinian perspective. Prog Neurobiol 86(1):48–59
Workman AD, Charvet CJ, Clancy B, Darlington RB, Finlay BL (2013) Modeling transformations of neurodevelopmental sequences across mammalian species. J Neurosci 33:7368–7383
Xiong K, Luo DW, Patrylo PR, Luo XG, Struble RG, Clough RW, Yan XX (2008) Doublecortin-expressing cells are present in layer II across the adult guinea pig cerebral cortex: partial colocalization with mature interneuron markers. Exp Neurol 211:271–282
Zhang XM, Cai Y, Chu Y, Chen EY, Feng JC, Luo XG, Xiong K, Struble RG, Clough RW, Patrylo PR, Kordower JH, Yan XX (2009) Doublecortin-expressing cells persist in the associate cerebral cortex and amygdala in aged nonhuman primates. Front Neuroanat 3:17
Zhao X, van Praag H (2020) Steps towards standardized quantification of adult neurogenesis. Nat Commun 11:4275
Zhou Y, Su Y, Li S, Kennedy BC, Zhang DY, Bond AM, Sun Y, Jacob F, Lu L, Hu P et al (2022) Molecular landscapes of human hippocampal immature neurons across lifespan. Nature 607:527–533
Zilles K, Palomero-Gallagher N, Amunts K (2013) Development of cortical folding during evolution and ontogeny. Trends Neurosci 36:275–284
Acknowledgements
We thank Springer-Nature for authorization to reproduce the image from Sanai et al., 2011, in Figure 4 (License number: 5581320703264).
Funding
This study was supported by Progetto Trapezio, Compagnia di San Paolo (67935-2021.2174) to L.B.; Fondazione CRT (Cassa di Risparmio di Torino; RF=2022.0618) to L.B.; and PhD program in Veterinary Sciences (University of Turin) to C.L. and M.G.; National Science Foundation (EF-2021785, DRL-2219759) and National Institutes of Health (HG011641) to C.C.S.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
L.B. and C.C.S. wrote the main manuscript text. L.B. prepared figures 1-5. C.C.S produced figure 6. C.L.R. and M.G. produced data used in the manuscript and edited the text.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Bonfanti, L., La Rosa, C., Ghibaudi, M. et al. Adult neurogenesis and “immature” neurons in mammals: an evolutionary trade-off in plasticity?. Brain Struct Funct (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-023-02717-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-023-02717-9