Abstract
The precise sulcogyral localization of cortical lesions is mandatory to improve communication between practitioners and to predict and prevent post-operative deficits. This process, which assumes a good knowledge of the cortex anatomy and a systematic analysis of images, is, nevertheless, sometimes neglected in the neurological and neurosurgical training. This didactic paper proposes a brief overview of the sulcogyral anatomy, using conventional MR-slices, and also reconstructions of the cortical surface after a more or less extended inflation process. This method simplifies the cortical anatomy by removing part of the cortical complexity induced by the folding process, and makes it more understandable. We then reviewed several methods for localizing cortical structures, and proposed a three-step identification: after localizing the lateral, medial or ventro-basal aspect of the hemisphere (step 1), the main interlobar sulci were located to limit the lobes (step 2). Finally, intralobar sulci and gyri were identified (step 3) thanks to the same set of rules. This paper does not propose any new identification method but should be regarded as a set of practical guidelines, useful in daily clinical practice, for detecting the main sulci and gyri of the human cortex.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Precise anatomical localization of cortico-subcortical lesions or functional activations is important for several reasons. First, it is a major tool for communication between people taking care of a patient and provides a gross evaluation of post-operative functional risks. Second, functional imaging informs on function and connectivity of eloquent brain areas, but results of functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or diffusion-weighted imaging tractography only make sense when interpreted in the light of the underlying anatomy. This localization can use cytoarchitectonics, coordinates, or the sulcogyral pattern, the latter being the only non-invasive option available in daily clinical practice.
Several attempts have been made to achieve this task, leading to more or less complicated and extensive nomenclature systems for identification of cortical structures (Gratiolet 1854; Ecker 1873; Broca 1878; Cunningham 1892; Ono et al. 1990; Federative Committee on Anatomical Terminology 1998; Duvernoy 1999). Several automated atlas-based systems were developed to automatically label the human cortex (Roland et al. 1994; Lancaster et al. 2000; Rettmann et al. 2002, 2005; Fischl et al. 2004; Klein et al. 2005; Regis et al. 2005; Clouchoux et al. 2006; Desikan et al. 2006; Heckemann et al. 2006; Shattuck et al. 2008; Destrieux et al. 2010). Nevertheless, since these methods are generally computing-time demanding and may be confused by lesions displacing sulcogyral structures (such as tumors and edema) or modifying the MRI signal of gray and white matter (such as strokes or tumors), they are mainly used for research purposes. Thus, clinicians have to manually identify important sulci and gyri located in the vicinity of a lesion. To provide accurate labeling, this identification has to follow a precise systematic and simple set of rules (Naidich et al. 1995; Naidich and Brightbill 1996a, b; Naidich et al. 1997; Braun et al. 2000) based on the knowledge of basic cortical anatomy.
This task is complicated by the highly convoluted surface of the human brain, which hides more or less 60 % of the cortical surface in the sulcal depth (Zilles et al. 1997; Van Essen 2005). Software has been developed to unfold the cortical surface and provide simpler views of its anatomy (Dale and Sereno 1993; Van Essen and Drury 1997; Dale et al. 1999; Fischl et al. 1999).
In this paper, we aim to provide the reader with (1) a simple description of the sulcogyral pattern using inflated representations of the brain. This description will have to be kept in mind to understand and apply (2) a set of selected rules helping the manual identification of major cortical structures on conventional anatomical MRIs. This paper is clearly not a proposal for a new nomenclature, since it mainly refers to the already standard nomenclature used in the radiological and neurosurgical fields (Ecker 1873; Duvernoy 1999). It is neither a review of possible anatomical variations that were nicely depicted elsewhere (Ono et al. 1990; Naidich et al. 1995). Instead, it should be regarded as a set of practical guidelines, useful in daily clinical practice, for detecting the main sulci and gyri of the human cortex.
Materials and methods
Data acquisition
Brain MRI from one 29-year-old normal male subject was used to illustrate this paper for both conventional and inflated representations. One high-resolution whole-head 3D T1-IR-weighted scan was collected on a 3T Verio Siemens scanner using a 32-channel coil (voxel size 0.75 × 0.75 × 0.75 mm, TR: 2200 ms, TE: 3.2 ms, TI: 900 ms, flip angle: 10°).
Conventional MR visualization
Images were transferred to OsiriX Lite 7.0.2 software (http://www.osirix-viewer.com/) running on an iMac Apple computer (Cupertino, CA, USA). Illustrative multiplanar reconstructions of major sulci were obtained in the desired plans.
Inflated reconstruction, labeling and visualization
Inflated representations of the cortical surface were used to illustrate the rules proposed in this paper. They provide a simpler representation of the cortex anatomy after getting rid of its convoluted aspect. The detailed reconstruction process of the cortical surface has previously been described in detail (Dale et al. 1999; Fischl et al. 1999) and is briefly described here. After correction for intensity variations due to magnetic field inhomogeneities, non-brain tissues were removed from the T1-weighted normalized images using a hybrid watershed/surface deformation procedure (Ségonne et al. 2004). The brain was then segmented using the signal intensity and geometric structure of the gray–white interface. Each hemisphere was automatically disconnected from the other and from the mesencephalon, resulting in two binarized white matter volumes—one for each hemisphere. The surface of each white matter volume was then tessellated with a triangular mesh, and deformed to obtain a smooth and accurate representation of the gray–white interface. After the topology of this surface was automatically corrected (Segonne et al. 2007), it was inflated in a way that retains much of the shape and metric properties of the original gray–white interface. This process unfolded the cortical sulci, leading to a representation where the whole cortical surface (i.e., sulcal and gyral) was visible. At the end of the reconstruction process, several images were available for each hemisphere: pial (no inflation, gray–CSF interface), white (no inflation, gray–white interface), inflated (inflation, gray–white interface) or semi-inflated.
The sulcogyral pattern of each hemisphere was then probabilistically segmented into 74 anatomical classes thanks to an automated procedure we previously created (Destrieux et al. 2010).
Proposed set of rules
Anatomical localization of a cortical lesion should begin by the identification of the aspect of the brain (medial, lateral, ventro-basal), then to the lobe and finally to the sulcus or gyrus it belongs to (Fig. 1). The first step—identification of the aspect of the hemisphere—is straightforward, and hence, we will only focus on steps 2 and 3 for the medial, lateral and ventro-basal aspects of the hemisphere successively. The rules are intended to be used in a clinical practice (i.e., on conventional slices), but we will also refer to surface reconstruction to better explore the cortical anatomy.
Medial aspect of the brain
Medial aspect: identification of interlobar sulci
At the medial aspect of the hemisphere, three interlobar sulci are easily recognized on both inflated reconstructions and slices (Figs. 1, 2): cingulate, subparietal and parieto-occipital.
The cingulate sulcus originates in the subcallosal area and has a curved course, which successively parallels the rostrum, genu and body of the corpus callosum. Close to the junction between the isthmus of the cingulum and the splenium of the corpus callosum, the marginal part of the cingulate sulcus ascends to reach the superior edge of the hemisphere. This curved course of the cingulate sulcus including its marginal part can easily be recognized on a parasagittal slice located a few millimeters lateral to the falx cerebri (Fig. 2a, b). On an axial slice located close to the vertex, this marginal part of the cingulate sulcus can also be localized as a small, anteriorly concave sulcus originating from the interhemispheric fissure (Fig. 2c). Since marginal parts of both hemispheres usually face each other, they are sometimes described as a bracket (Naidich and Brightbill 1996b).
The subparietal sulcus, which continues the main direction of the cingulate sulcus around the superior aspect of the splenium of the corpus callosum, can be best seen on the parasagittal slice used for identification of the cingulate sulcus (Fig. 2a, b). It usually has an upside down “Y” shape on parasagittal slices.
The parieto-occipital fissure is a deep sulcus that originates posteriorly at the superior edge of the hemisphere, runs anterior and ventral, and joins the junction between the middle and anterior parts of the calcarine sulcus (Fig. 2a, b, yellow arrow); the calcarine sulcus is not an interlobar sulcus since it is located at the middle of the occipital lobe, between the cuneus (or O6, dorsal) and lingual gyrus (or O5, ventral). It is described here due to its major relationships with the parieto-occipital fissure (Fig. 2a, b); the calcarine sulcus is, indeed, made of three parts: (1) middle, that has a more or less horizontal and “zigzagged” course at the medial aspect of the occipital lobe; (2) posterior, that bifurcates close to the posterior tip of the occipital pole and sometimes exits the interhemispheric fissure to reach the most posterior aspect of the occipital lobe; and (3) anterior, which ends posterior and ventral to the cingulate isthmus. The parieto-occipital fissure and calcarine sulcus are best seen on the same parasagittal slice as the one depicting the cingulate and subparietal sulci (Fig. 2b). On coronal views located posterior to their union (i.e., through the middle part of the calcarine sulcus), the parieto-occipital fissure and calcarine sulcus appear as two deep sulci that medially reach the interhemispheric fissure (Fig. 2d). Due to their relative obliquity, the distance between them decreases as the coronal slice becomes more anterior. Anterior to their union, the anterior part of the calcarine sulcus appears as a deep sulcus directed toward the medial aspect of the occipital horn of the lateral ventricle where it creates a small bump, or calcar avis.
Medial aspect: identification of sulci and gyri
The organization of the main sulci at the medial aspect of the brain is simple since these interlobar sulci limit together (Figs. 1, 2):
-
1.
the cingulate gyrus, located between the corpus callosum and cingulate sulcus/subparietal sulcus/anterior part of the calcarine sulcus (Fig. 2a, b, d);
-
2.
the frontal lobe: the medial aspect of the superior frontal gyrus (or F1) is located above the cingulate gyrus and anterior to its marginal part. It sometimes contains an additional discontinuous supracingulate sulcus, more or less connected to the cingulate sulcus. At the junction between the medial and ventral aspects of the frontal lobe, the gyrus rectus is dorsally limited from the superior frontal gyrus by the suborbital sulcus, which parallels the ventral part of the cingulate sulcus. A second suborbital sulcus sometimes runs parallel and dorsal to it (Fig. 2a, b);
-
3.
the parietal lobe (precuneus, or medial P1) which is located dorsal to the subparietal sulcus, posterior to the marginal part of the cingulate sulcus, and antero-dorsal to the parieto-occipital fissure (Fig. 2a, b, d);
-
4.
the cuneus, (O6), one of the two occipital gyri visible at the medial aspect of the brain with the lingual gyrus. It forms a triangle located between the parieto-occipital fissure anteriorly, and the calcarine sulcus ventrally (Fig. 2a, b, d). The lingual gyrus will be described within the ventro-basal aspect of the brain section.
Lateral aspect of the brain
Lateral aspect: identification of interlobar sulci
Three interlobar sulci divide the lateral aspect of the hemisphere (Fig. 1): the lateral part of the lateral fissure, the circular sulcus of the insula and the central sulcus. The lateral part of the lateral fissure is easily recognized on sagittal slices lateral to the insula, where the frontal and parietal lobes face the temporal lobe (Fig. 3). It is divided in three segments: (1) middle, gently ascending posteriorly and parallel to the main axis of the temporal lobe, (2) posterior, ascending into the parietal lobe, and (3) anterior, that rapidly divides into vertical and horizontal rami (Fig. 3a). On coronal views, the lateral fissure opens into the lateral fossa, medially limited by the insula. Put together, on coronal slices, the lateral fossa and fissure resemble a “T” letter lying on its side (Fig. 3c).
The insula (Fig. 3b, c) is located deep in the lateral fossa and limited from the surrounding frontal, parietal and temporal opercula by the circular sulcus of the insula. This sulcus is best seen on a sagittal plane reoriented on coronal and axial view to follow the main plane of the insula (Fig. 3b). It appears as a triangle made of three segments: inferior (border with the temporal operculum), superior (limit with the frontal and parietal operculum), and anterior (limit to the orbital gyri). The superior and inferior parts posteriorly fuse to form the posterior segment of the lateral fissure, while the anterior and inferior parts join close to the limen insulae.
The central sulcus is more complicated to localize and a good knowledge of the anatomy of the surrounding sulci –nicely depicted on the semi-inflated views (Fig. 4b, d, f)—is mandatory for its identification (Fig. 4); the central sulcus originates at the superior edge of the hemisphere, just anterior to the marginal part of the cingulate sulcus, runs ventrally and anteriorly towards the lateral fissure that it does not reach (Fig. 4a, b). The precentral sulcus parallels the central sulcus and is usually divided into a superior and an inferior segment. These segments, respectively, connect orthogonally with the superior and inferior frontal sulci that run more or less horizontally in the frontal lobe. Posterior to the central sulcus, the postcentral sulcus also parallels the central sulcus and its inferior tip ends between the central sulcus and posterior tip of the lateral fissure. It is posteriorly continued by the intraparietal sulcus. Several rules may be used to localize the inferior, middle and superior segments of the central sulcus:
-
To localize the inferior tip of the central sulcus (Fig. 4a, b), the sagittal slice showing the vertical and horizontal rami of the anterior segment of the lateral fissure has to be selected (Fig. 4a). The horizontal sulcus located just above these two rami is the inferior frontal sulcus, which posteriorly connects at right angle to the inferior segment of the precentral sulcus. The central sulcus is located just posterior to the latter.
The identification of the inferior tip of the central sulcus may be confirmed on the same sagittal slice (Fig. 4a) showing the posterior tip of the lateral fissure surrounded by the supramarginal gyrus (see below, parietal lobe). Three parallel sulci are located anterior to the posterior tip of the lateral fissure, from posterior to anterior: postcentral, central and precentral.
-
The middle part of the central sulcus may be localized thanks to the junction between the superior frontal sulcus and the precentral sulcus (Fig. 4c). On axial views inspected in a descending direction from the vertex, the superior frontal sulcus is easily localized as the first antero-posterior continuous sulcus running parallel to the midline (Fig. 4c). The slice best depicting the superior frontal sulcus is usually located 2–3 cm from the vertex, which helps in differentiating it from the more lateral and ventral inferior frontal sulcus. Once the superior frontal sulcus is localized, the superior segment of the precentral sulcus can be identified as a descending sulcus branching perpendicular to it, and the central sulcus is located just posterior to it.
Just posterior and ventral to the superior-frontal/precentral sulcus junction, the precentral gyrus has an anteriorly concave curved course that usually corresponds to the primary motor cortex of the hand (Fig. 4d). This “omega sign” is best seen on axial slices located a few millimeters ventral to the junction between the precentral and superior frontal sulci. Nevertheless, it has to be used with caution since the postcentral gyrus sometimes follows the same curved course. Finally, the middle part of the precentral gyrus may be localized thanks to additional signs: its thickness (Fig. 4d) exceeds that of the postcentral gyrus (Meyer et al. 1996; Fischl and Dale 2000), and it has a lower signal intensity on turbo FLAIR images (Karaarslan and Arslan 2003).
-
The superior tip of the central sulcus is best localized on a parasagittal view depicting the cingulate sulcus: the superior tip of the central sulcus centers the parasagittal lobule meaning that it is the first sulcus anterior to the marginal part of the cingulate sulcus (Fig. 4e). Similarly, on axial view (Fig. 4g), the central sulcus superiorly ends just anterior to the “brackets” corresponding to the marginal part of the cingulate sulci (see medial aspect).
Once located, the lateral fissure, circular sulcus of the insula and central sulcus limit (Fig. 1):
-
1.
The insula, encircled by the circular sulcus of the insula.
-
2.
The frontal lobe, located anterior to the central sulcus and dorsal to the lateral fissure.
-
3.
The parietal lobe, located just posterior to the central sulcus and dorsal to the lateral fissure.
-
4.
The temporal lobe, located ventral to the lateral fissure.
The anterior limit of the occipital lobe is unclear at the lateral aspect of the hemisphere, only marked by an inconstant temporo-occipital notch, sometimes continued by an ascending anterior occipital sulcus. A virtual curved line joining the inferior to the superior edges of the hemisphere was, therefore, proposed (Figs. 6, 7): It runs between the temporo-occipital notch and the superior tip of the parieto-occipital fissure. Nevertheless, precise localization of lesions of this temporo–parieto–occipital “crossroad” is quite difficult.
Lateral aspect: identification of intralobar sulci and gyri
In this section, identification rules for the insula, frontal, parietal, temporal and occipital lobes will be successively provided.
Sulci and gyri of the insula can only be properly studied on appropriate oblique sagittal view that has to be parallel to the plane of the insula in both axial and coronal views (Fig. 3). The insula is divided by the central sulcus of the insula, which joins the superior and inferior segments of the circular sulcus of the insula and continues the direction of the central sulcus. The central sulcus of the insula divides the insular cortex into long insular gyri posteriorly (usually two gyri) and short insular gyri anteriorly (usually three gyri).
The main sulci and gyri dividing the lateral aspect of the frontal lobe (Fig. 5a–c) were previously described: the precentral gyrus is a strip of cortex located between the central and precentral sulci from which it follows the orientation. It is limited from the horizontally directed superior frontal gyrus by the upper part of the precentral sulcus. The superior frontal gyrus (or F1) extends from the superior frontal sulcus on the lateral aspect of the brain, to the cingulate sulcus on its medial aspect. It sometimes contains an additional interrupted sulcus on its lateral aspect, the medial frontal sulcus. The later, which courses antero-posteriorly, parallels the superior frontal sulcus but is discontinuous.
The inferior frontal gyrus (or F3, Fig. 5a, b) is located between the superior segment of the circular sulcus of the insula and inferior frontal sulcus, and is limited from the precentral gyrus by the inferior part of the precentral sulcus. After a horizontal course, the inferior frontal sulcus anteriorly takes a descending and then more or less posterior direction. This recurrent course is known as the lateral orbital sulcus, which may also be independent from the inferior frontal sulcus. The inferior frontal gyrus, that constitutes the frontal operculum, is subdivided into three parts by the horizontal and vertical rami of the anterior segment of the lateral fissure: (1) the triangular part is located between these two rami; (2) the orbital part is located between the horizontal ramus and the lateral orbital sulcus; and (3) the opercular part is limited by the vertical ramus anteriorly, and a small ascending and posteriorly concave sulcus connected to the lateral fissure, the anterior subcentral sulcus (Fig. 5a, b). The middle frontal gyrus (F2) is located between the superior and inferior frontal sulci (Fig. 5a, c). Due to the segmentation of the precentral sulcus in superior and inferior segments, and contrary to superior and inferior frontal gyri, it appears continuous with the precentral gyrus. The middle frontal gyrus is the largest frontal gyrus visible at the lateral aspect of the frontal lobe, and it is frequently subdivided by a horizontal discontinuous sulcus, the middle frontal sulcus. This sulcus, which does not connect to the precentral sulcus, reaches the frontal pole, but may be connected to the superior or inferior frontal sulci at its anterior course.
At the frontal pole (Fig. 5a, d), the longitudinal superior and middle frontal gyri are interrupted by one or several transverse gyri that are perpendicular to the midline: the fronto-marginal gyrus forms the junction of the lateral and orbital aspects of the frontal lobe at the frontal pole. It is accompanied by one or two transverse frontopolar gyri that run at its dorsal aspect and reach the midline.
The lateral aspect of the parietal lobe (Fig. 6) is divided by a large sulcal complex, sometimes described as a whole (Duvernoy 1999): the postcentral sulcus is, indeed, sometimes continuous with the intraparietal sulcus, without any sharp angle at their junction, these two sulci usually forming an inferiorly concave curve (Fig. 6a–c). Identification of the postcentral sulcus, immediately anterior to the posterior tip of the lateral fissure, was previously presented. The intraparietal sulcus parallels the midline and is posteriorly continued by the superior occipital sulcus without any clear limit (Fig. 6a, b). It is best seen on coronal sections as a deep vertical sulcus having several transverse rami (Fig. 6d). The postcentral–intraparietal sulcal complex divides the lateral aspect of the parietal lobe into: postcentral gyrus, superior and inferior parietal lobules (Fig. 6a–c). The postcentral gyrus is limited by the central and postcentral sulci and is connected to the precentral gyrus by two plis de passage: the subcentral gyrus (Fig. 6a, b) and paracentral lobule (Fig. 2a–c), respectively, located around the infero-lateral and supero-medial tips of the central sulcus. The superior (P1) and inferior (P2) parietal lobules are located posterior to the postcentral sulcus and separated by the intraparietal sulcus. The inferior parietal lobule is further subdivided into supramarginal and angular gyri, respectively, running around the posterior tips of the lateral fissure and the superior temporal sulcus. A descending inconstant sulcus branching from the intraparietal sulcus, the sulcus intermedius primus, sometimes clearly limits them (Fig. 6a, b).
As previously stated, no clear limit exists between the lateral aspects of the temporal and occipital lobes (Fig. 7). They are subdivided by two temporal (superior and inferior) and three occipital (superior, middle and inferior) sulci.
The superior temporal sulcus is deep and parallels the lateral fissure to ascend posteriorly where it sometimes divides into two branches surrounded by the angular gyrus (posterior part of the inferior parietal lobule). Conversely, the inferior temporal sulcus is less deep but discontinuous. They both reach the temporal pole (Fig. 7a, c, d). The superior and inferior occipital sulci, respectively, continue the intraparietal and inferior temporal sulci, posterior to the virtual line anteriorly limiting the occipital lobe (between the superior tip of the parieto-occipital fissure and temporo-occipital notch/anterior occipital sulcus). Finally, the middle, or lateral occipital sulcus is located between them, into the middle occipital gyrus (Fig. 7a, b, e).
The superior occipital gyrus (O1) is a strip of cortex located between the dorsal edge of the hemisphere and the superior occipital sulcus (Fig. 7a, b, e). It continues the superior parietal lobule (P1) posterior to the level of the parieto-occipital fissure, and is medially continuous with the cuneus (O6) at the medial aspect of the brain without any distinct sulcal limit (Fig. 7e, g).
The superior temporal gyrus (T1), which runs from the inferior segment of the circular sulcus of the insula to the superior temporal sulcus, represents the temporal operculum (Fig. 7a, c, d). Its lateral aspect is posteriorly continued by the inferior parietal lobule (P2), at the junction between the angular and supramarginal gyri. The superior aspect of T1 (Fig. 8a–d), which is the ventral bank of the lateral fissure, is a rather flat area interrupted by one or two transverse temporal gyri. On axial view (Fig. 8b), they form one or two cortical strips running antero-laterally from the posterior segment of the insula to the lateral aspect of the brain. They can easily be recognized on sagittal and coronal planes as small bulge(s), more or less resembling mushrooms (Fig. 8c, d). The transverse temporal gyrus/gyri split the superior aspect of T1 in planum temporale posteriorly and planum polare anteriorly (Fig. 8a–c).
The middle temporal gyrus (T2) is a straight cortical strip limited by the superior and inferior temporal sulci (Fig. 7a, c, d). It is continuous with the middle (or lateral) occipital gyrus (O2). The latter, which represents most of the lateral aspect of the occipital lobe, is located between the superior and inferior occipital sulci and subdivided by the middle (or lateral) occipital sulcus (Fig. 7a, e). Similarly, the inferior temporal (T3) and occipital (O3) gyri are located along the ventral edge of the hemisphere, between the inferior temporal and occipital sulci dorsally, and the lateral temporo-occipital sulcus ventro-medially (Fig. 7a–g).
Ventro-basal aspect of the brain
Ventro-basal aspect: identification of interlobar sulci
The basal part of the lateral fissure forms a clear limit between the frontal and temporal lobes at the ventro-basal aspect of the brain (Fig. 5d). This is a large cleft joining the anterior perforated space to the limen insulae, along the posterior ridge of the lesser wings of the sphenoid bone. Conversely, no sulcus clearly limits the ventral aspect of the temporal and occipital lobes.
Ventro-basal aspect: identification of sulci and gyri
The orbital part of the frontal lobe (Fig. 5d) is a flat or slightly inferiorly concave area that surrounds the roof of the orbit. It is best explored on axial views, and contains two main sulci: (1) the olfactory sulcus that faces the olfactory tract and has a longitudinal course, a few millimeters from the midline; and (2) the H-shaped sulcus located laterally. The gyrus rectus forms the border between the medial and orbital aspects of the frontal lobe and is laterally limited by the olfactory sulcus. The orbital gyri form the rest of the orbital aspect of the frontal lobe and are subdivided into anterior, posterior medial and lateral parts by the H-shaped sulcus.
The ventro-basal part of the occipital and temporal lobes is subdivided by two longitudinal sulci, the lateral and medial temporo-occipital sulci (Fig. 7c, d, f). The medial temporo-occipital (or collateral) sulcus anteriorly reaches the temporal pole, whereas the lateral temporo-occipital sulcus is usually discontinuous and ends more posteriorly.
The lateral temporo-occipital or fusiform (T4–O4) gyrus is located between the lateral and medial temporo-occipital sulci. It is only present in the occipital lobe and posterior part of the temporal lobe, and has a characteristic triangular shape facing the floor of the middle cranial fossa on coronal views (Fig. 7d). The medial temporo-occipital gyrus (T5–O5) runs from the temporal to occipital poles, medial to the medial temporo-occipital sulcus. It may be divided into temporal (or parahippocampal gyrus, T5) and occipital (or lingual gyrus, O5) segments (Fig. 7f). The flat superior aspect of the parahippocampal gyrus, known as the subiculum, is continuous with the cornu ammonis of the hippocampus located dorsally.
Discussion and conclusion
Because image-guided surgery provides the neurosurgeon a great aid in localizing brain lesions during surgical procedures, precise anatomical localization of brain lesions in terms of sulcogyral anatomy sometimes seems outdated. It, nevertheless, remains important on a daily practice for a better communication between medical specialties (neuroradiologists, neurologists, neurosurgeons, neuroscientists): lesions are sometimes described in vague terms (“in the frontal lobe”) that may additionally vary from one report to another. Having the same lesion described in different locations in various reports is of course a major source of confusion. Similarly, preoperatively describing a given lesion as pre- or post-central (as well as involving the supramarginal or the angular gyrus, the cuneus or the precuneus, etc.) would significantly modify the predicted consequences of the operative procedure; it would, thus, highly influence its planned resectability and, therefore, post-operative prognosis.
Using automated systems for sulcogyral identification is appealing, and multiple systems were proposed. Nevertheless, they usually rely upon more or less complicated algorithms taking several hours to provide a precise anatomical parcellation of the brain. For instance, the FreeSurfer packages include several brain atlases for both cortical (Desikan et al. 2006; Destrieux et al. 2010) and subcortical parcellations (Fischl et al. 2002). These methods unambiguously label every vertex of the brain using a Bayesian approach and brain atlases. This is one of the major available tools in the neuroimaging field but requires about 10 h to obtain the reconstruction of a segmented brain and brain surface. This is obviously not usable in a daily clinical practice. Moreover, the presence of a lesion or edema may be responsible for abnormal brain segmentation and may impose modified or additional procedures such as manual masking.
Being able to perform a manual sulcogyral segmentation in the vicinity of a brain lesion, thus, appears as a prerequisite for a good clinical practice. To be efficient (i.e., precise and not time-consuming), such a method has to use a simple set of rules systematically applied. This review did not aim to propose original rules, but to summarize and systematically organize them in a way usable in clinical practice.
This method relies upon three successive steps, namely the identification of the brain aspect, lobe and sulci/gyri bordering the lesion. It consists in localizing, on slices, large and simple structures first, then increasing the precision of this localization up to the sulcal/gyral level. This “concentric” approach is preferable to a direct one, which sometimes is closer to guessing than to a rational method.
References
Braun M, Anxionnat R, Marchal C et al (2000) Radioanatomy of the cerebral cortex. Practical guide of identification. J Radiol 81:704–716
Broca P (1878) Nomenclature Cérébrale. Dénomination des divisions et subdivisions des hémisphères et des anfractuosités de leur surface. Rev Anthropol 2:193–236
Clouchoux C, Coulon O, Anton J-L et al (2006) A new cortical surface parcellation model and its automatic implementation. Med Image Comput Comput-Assist Interv MICCAI Int Conf Med Image Comput Comput-Assist Interv 9:193–200
Cunningham DJ (1892) Contribution to the surface anatomy of the cerebral hemispheres. Academy House, Dublin
Dale AM, Sereno MI (1993) Improved localizadon of cortical activity by combining EEG and MEG with MRI cortical surface reconstruction: a linear approach. J Cogn Neurosci 5:162–176. doi:10.1162/jocn.1993.5.2.162
Dale AM, Fischl B, Sereno MI (1999) Cortical surface-based analysis. I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage 9:179–194
Desikan RS, Segonne F, Fischl B et al (2006) An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. Neuroimage 31:968–980. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021
Destrieux C, Fischl B, Dale A, Halgren E (2010) Automatic parcellation of human cortical gyri and sulci using standard anatomical nomenclature. Neuroimage 53:1–15. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.010
Duvernoy HM (1999) The human brain. Surface, blood supply, and three-dimensional sectional anatomy, 2nd edn. Springer, Wien, New York
Ecker A (1873) The cerebral convolutions of man: represented according to original observations, especially upon their development in the foetus, intended for the use of physicians. Appleton & Co., New York
Federative Committee on Anatomical Terminology (1998) Terminologia anatomica: international anatomical terminology. Thieme, Stuttgart, New York
Fischl B, Dale AM (2000) Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:11050–11055
Fischl B, Sereno MI, Dale AM (1999) Cortical surface-based analysis. II: inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system. Neuroimage 9:195–207
Fischl B, Salat DH, Busa E et al (2002) Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron 33:341–355
Fischl B, van der Kouwe A, Destrieux C et al (2004) Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex 14:11–22
Gratiolet P (1854) Mémoire sur les plis cérébraux de l’homme et des primates. Arthus Bertrand, Paris
Heckemann RA, Hajnal JV, Aljabar P et al (2006) Automatic anatomical brain MRI segmentation combining label propagation and decision fusion. Neuroimage 33:115–126. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.05.061
Karaarslan E, Arslan A (2003) Perirolandic cortex of the normal brain: low signal intensity on turbo FLAIR MR images. Radiology 227:538–541. doi:10.1148/radiol.2272020311
Klein A, Mensh B, Ghosh S et al (2005) Mindboggle: automated brain labeling with multiple atlases. BMC Med Imaging 5:7. doi:10.1186/1471-2342-5-7
Lancaster JL, Woldorff MG, Parsons LM et al (2000) Automated Talairach atlas labels for functional brain mapping. Hum Brain Mapp 10:120–131. doi:10.1002/1097-0193(200007)10:3<120:AID-HBM30>3.0.CO;2-8
Meyer JR, Roychowdhury S, Russell EJ et al (1996) Location of the central sulcus via cortical thickness of the precentral and postcentral gyri on MR. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 17:1699–1706
Naidich TP, Brightbill TC (1996a) Systems for localizing fronto-parietal gyri and sulci on axial CT and MRI. Int J Neuroradiol 2:313–338
Naidich TP, Brightbill TC (1996b) The pars marginalis: part I. A “bracket” sign for the central sulcus in axial plane CT and MRI. Int J Neuroradiol 2:3–19
Naidich TP, Valavanis AG, Kubik S (1995) Anatomic relationships along the low-middle convexity: part I-normal specimens and magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurgery 36:517–532
Naidich TP, Valavanis AG, Kubik S et al (1997) Anatomic relationships along the low-middle convexity: part II: lesion localization. Int J Neuroradiol 3:393–409
Ono M, Kubik S, Abernathey CD (1990) Atlas of the cerebral sulci. G. Thieme Verlag, Thieme Medical Publishers, New York, Stuttgart
Regis J, Mangin JF, Ochiai T et al (2005) “Sulcal root” generic model: a hypothesis to overcome the variability of the human cortex folding patterns. Neurol Med Chir Tokyo 45:1–17
Rettmann ME, Han X, Xu C, Prince JL (2002) Automated sulcal segmentation using watersheds on the cortical surface. Neuroimage 15:329–344
Rettmann ME, Tosun D, Tao X et al (2005) Program for assisted labeling of sulcal regions (PALS): description and reliability. Neuroimage 24:398–416. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.08.014
Roland PE, Graufelds CJ, Wahlin J, Ingelman L (1994) Human brain atlas: for high-resolution functional and anatomical mapping. Hum Brain Mapp 1:173–184
Ségonne F, Dale AM, Busa E, Glessner M, Salat D, Hahn HK, Fischl B, Ségonne F, Dale AM, Busa E, Glessner M, Salat D, Hahn HK, Fischl B (2004) A hybrid approach to the skull stripping problem in MRI. NeuroImage 22(3):1060–1075
Segonne F, Pacheco J, Fischl B (2007) Geometrically accurate topology-correction of cortical surfaces using nonseparating loops. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 26:518–529. doi:10.1109/TMI.2006.887364
Shattuck DW, Mirza M, Adisetiyo V et al (2008) Construction of a 3D probabilistic atlas of human cortical structures. Neuroimage 39:1064–1080. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.031
Van Essen DC (2005) A population-average, landmark- and surface-based (PALS) atlas of human cerebral cortex. Neuroimage 28:635–662. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.058
Van Essen DC, Drury HA (1997) Structural and functional analyses of human cerebral cortex using a surface-based atlas. J Neurosci 17:7079–7102
Zilles K, Schleicher A, Langemann C et al (1997) Quantitative analysis of sulci in the human cerebral cortex: development, regional heterogeneity, gender difference, asymmetry, intersubject variability and cortical architecture. Hum Brain Mapp 5:218–221
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Destrieux, C., Terrier, L.M., Andersson, F. et al. A practical guide for the identification of major sulcogyral structures of the human cortex. Brain Struct Funct 222, 2001–2015 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-016-1320-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-016-1320-z