Abstract
Purpose
Inguinal hernia (IH) after radical prostatectomy (RP) is a complication that impairs quality of life; however, the factors contributing to IH after RP remain unclear. Therefore, we herein attempted to identify the factors responsible for the development of IH after RP.
Methods
We reviewed 622 patients who underwent laparoscopic or robot-assisted laparoscopic RP at our hospital between December 2011 and April 2020. The total fat area and visceral fat area were calculated at the level of the umbilicus using computed tomography, and the subcutaneous fat area (SFA) was calculated by subtracting the visceral fat area from the total fat area. The psoas muscle area was measured at the third lumbar vertebrae level using computed tomography to calculate the psoas muscle mass index, which is used in sarcopenia as an index of muscle mass. We investigated the risk factors for IH after laparoscopic or robot-assisted laparoscopic RP.
Results
IH developed in 88 patients (16.7%). Fifty-seven of these patients underwent hernia repair at our hospital, and 56 (98.2%) had indirect hernias. A multivariate analysis identified SFA (odds ratios: 0.383, p < 0.001) as an independent predictor for the development of IH. Two-year IH-free survival rates were 77.3% in the small SFA group (SFA < 123 cm2) and 88.7% in the large SFA group (SFA ≥ 123 cm2) (p < 0.001).
Conclusion
Subcutaneous fat was associated with the development of IH, particularly indirect IH, after laparoscopic or robot-assisted laparoscopic RP. An indirect IH prevention technique needs to be considered, particularly for patients with less subcutaneous fat.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men, and radical prostatectomy (RP) is one of the standard treatments that is widely performed for localized prostate cancer [1]. Urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction are well-known complications of RP, whereas inguinal hernia (IH) is not. IH after RP was initially reported by Regan et al. in 1996, and occurred in 13.7% of patients after open RP, 7.5% after laparoscopic RP (LRP), and 7.9% after robot-assisted laparoscopic RP (RALP) [2, 3]. The mechanisms underlying the development of IH after RP have not yet been elucidated, and contributing factors, such as the presence of patent processus vaginalis (PPV), a low body mass index (BMI), dysuria, sarcopenia, an extraperitoneal approach, and thin external oblique muscle, were identified in previous studies [4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. A relationship with low BMI has also been reported for IH regardless of RP; however, the underlying mechanisms remain unknown [11,12,13,14]. Low BMI was the most frequently reported independent risk factor for IH after RP in 4 studies. The factors contributing to low BMI are fat and muscle, with either or both of these factors exerting an effect. Regarding muscle mass, a previous study implicated sarcopenia in the development of IH and we measure the psoas muscle mass index (PMI) as an index of sarcopenia [10, 15]. The purpose of the present study was to clarify risk factors for and the mechanisms underlying the development of IH by measuring the subcutaneous fat area (SFA), visceral fat area (VFA), and PMI.
Materials and methods
Patient selection and data collection
We reviewed 622 patients who underwent RALP or LRP at our hospital between December 2011 and April 2020. Ninety-four patients were excluded: 69 with a postoperative follow-up of less than 300 days, 9 who underwent bilateral IH surgery, and 16 on whom computed tomography (CT) was not performed at our hospital. The median follow-up period in the present study was 46.4 months (range, 10.1–110.2). IH was diagnosed by a physical examination by a gastrointestinal surgeon. We examined parameters that were assumed to be relevant in previous studies, such as age, BMI, prostate-specific antigen, prostate volume, previous abdominal surgery, the surgical approach, operative time, and nerve sparing, measured the thickness of the rectus muscle (TRM), SFA, VFA, and the psoas muscle area, and calculated PMI. LRP was performed via an extraperitoneal approach, and RALP by a transperitoneal approach, except for patients with glaucoma, cerebral aneurysm, or strong peritoneal adhesions.
Area measurements using CT
CT was preoperatively performed for stage evaluations. The AW server (GE Healthcare) was used to measure the area of − 150 HU ~ − 50 HU at the level of the umbilicus, and the total fat area (TFA) and VFA were calculated (Fig. 1) [16]. The measurement of fat area on CT has been established as a practical method with high inter- and intraobserver reproducibility and strong correlation with fat volume [17]. The psoas muscle area was measured at the third lumbar vertebrae (L3) level from 0 to 100 HU, and PMI was calculated by summing the left and right areas of the psoas muscle and dividing by height squared (Fig. 2) [15]. We used PMI as the index of sarcopenia. TRM was measured at the thickest part around the level of the umbilicus.
Statistical analysis
Statistical differences between the groups were examined using the χ2 test for categorical data and the Mann–Whitney U test for continuous data. The IH-free rate was estimated using a Kaplan–Meier analysis and differences among groups were tested using the Log-rank test. Multiple logistic regressions were used to identify independent predictors of IH. The significance of differences was defined as p < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS ver.25 statistical software package (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
Results
IH developed in 88 patients (16.7%). Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. Among the 528 patients, LRP was performed on 277 and RALP on 251. BMI was significantly lower in patients with than in those without IH (23.8 kg/m2 vs. 22.9 kg/m2, p < 0.001). There were 119 cases of abdominal surgeries, including 55 cases after appendectomy, 30 cases after unilateral inguinal hernia surgery, 15 cases after cholecystectomy, 8 cases after gastrectomy, and others such as nephrectomy and colectomy. Nerve-sparing surgery was performed more often in the IH-free group (25% vs. 17%, p = 0.129). Median SFA and VFA were significantly smaller in the IH group than in the IH-free group (SFA; 104.8 cm2 vs. 127.8 cm2, p < 0.001, VFA; 90.4 cm2 vs. 123.1 cm2, p < 0.001). Median PMI and TRM were 6.86 cm2/m2 and 10.7 mm, respectively, and did not correlate with the development of IH. In the multivariate analysis, small SFA was the only independent predictor for the development of IH (odds ratio: 0.383, p < 0.001) (Table 2). Two-year IH-free survival rates were 77.3% in the small SFA group and 88.7% in the large SFA group by the Kaplan–Meier analysis (p < 0.001) (Fig. 3).
Among the 88 patients who developed IH, it was on the right side in 55 (62.5%), and 75 (85.2%) underwent hernia repair surgery. The European Hernia Society (EHS) classification of the 57 patients who underwent surgery at our hospital is shown in Table 3, and 56 (98.2%) were indirect hernias. The EHS classification is as follows: L1 is an indirect hernia with a hernia port of less than 1 finger, L2 is an indirect hernia with a hernia port of more than 1 finger, but less than 2 fingers, L3 is an indirect hernia with a hernia port of more than 2 fingers, and M is a direct hernia.
Discussion
IH was previously reported to occur in 13.7% of patients after open RP, 7.5% after LRP, and 7.9% after RALP [3]. Although the development of IH decreased with the shift from open RP to LRP or RALP, it is still common. Most cases of IH require surgery due to pain, discomfort, and the risk of impaction, and it is regarded as a high-grade complication of RP [18]. Hernia repair surgery after RP is challenging due to the development of adhesions [19]. Therefore, urologists need to reduce the risk of IH after RP as well as urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction [19].
In the present study, we investigated 622 patients who underwent LRP or RALP, and 16.7% developed IH, which was slightly higher than that previously reported [3]. IH is reportedly more common in Asians than in Europeans, which is explained by differences in BMI and muscle mass due to the body composition [10, 20]. Low BMI was identified as a risk factor for IH in several regional studies. Visceral fat and preperitoneal fat are assumed to act as a plug to prevent the onset of disease, and the fat and thickness of the abdominal wall have been proposed to help prevent the development of IH [11,12,13,14].
In terms of IH after RP, the most frequently reported risk factor for the development of IH is also low BMI. Other factors, such as psoas muscle volume and external oblique muscle thickness, have been identified [5, 10]. BMI is calculated from height and weight, and weight is affected by both fat and muscle. However, fat and muscle have not yet been examined separately as individual risk factors for the development of IH after RP. The strength of the present study is that we collected CT data from the majority of patients because it is routinely performed before RP at our institution. We measured areas of fat and muscle in detail using CT, and the multivariate analysis identified SFA as the only risk factor for the development of IH after RP. In the presence of PPV, the inguinal canal is connected to the abdominal cavity; however, abdominal viscera do not enter because the internal oblique and transverse muscles have dynamic rather than static defense mechanisms. The transverse muscle has been proposed to close like a shutter, while the internal inguinal ring closes like a sphincter when abdominal pressure rises; although this anatomy was observed in autopsies, it has not yet been clinically proven [21]. Subcutaneous fat may strengthen the transverse fascia and function as a defense mechanism by preventing the development of IH from the internal inguinal ring with a thick abdominal wall [8, 13, 22].
Regarding muscle mass, the multivariate analysis did not select PMI or TRM as risk factors. A previous study measured psoas muscle volume using a 3-dimensional image analysis system and identified a relationship between sarcopenia and the development of IH [10]. In the present study, we used PMI as an index of sarcopenia, and it was not identified as a factor for IH. We also measured TRM as an index of abdominal wall thickness, and it was not associated with the development of IH, which is consistent with previous findings. Another study reported a relationship between the thickness of the external oblique muscle and the development of IH [5]. However, the thickness of this muscle is sensitive to respiratory variations, which are difficult to measure accurately with CT and, thus, this may be a limitation [10].
Among the 88 patients who developed IH, it was on the right side in 55 (62.5%), which is consistent with previous findings showing the development of IH on the right side in two-thirds of cases in the general population. This may be attributed to the asymmetrical anatomy of the sigmoid colon on the left side. The sigmoid colon may play a role in preventing hernia by attaching to the dissected pelvic floor [22, 23]. Among the 57 patients who underwent surgery at our hospital, 56 (98.2%) had indirect hernias, all of which were L2 or greater in the EHS classification, which means that the diameter of the internal inguinal ring was wider than 1 finger. A previous study reported that vesicourethral anastomosis widened the internal inguinal ring due to traction of the peritoneum and vas deferens [4]. Several preventive measures have been proposed to reduce the development of IH, but none have yet been established and may result in longer surgery times. Lee et al. incised the lateral-side internal inguinal floor of PPV, dissected along the spermatic cord, plugged hemostatic agents into the end of the canal, and closed the internal inguinal floor [24]. Shimbo et al. reduced the rate of IH from 19.4 to 2.2% by releasing the vas deferens from the peritoneum a distance of 5 cm with or without cutting the vas deferens to reduce tension to the internal inguinal ring. Since the widening of the inner inguinal ring is considered to be one of the causes of IH, the preventive method by Shimbo et al. appears to be reasonable [4].
Based on the findings described above, patients with a widened internal inguinal ring due to prostatectomy and low subcutaneous fat may develop IH due to the breakdown of defense mechanisms. We need to consider the risk of indirect IH after RP and perform preventive procedures, such as that described by Shimbo et al., particularly for patients with low subcutaneous fat.
There are several limitations that need to be addressed. The present study was not a prospective, randomized controlled study. Furthermore, since our data on the development of IH were collected from medical records, some undetectable IH may have been overlooked. Moreover, details on hernia repair surgeries were only available for patients who underwent surgery at our hospital, and not for those at other hospitals. Further studies on the relationship between the development of IH and fat volume are needed in the future.
Conclusion
Subcutaneous fat is associated with the development of IH. The incidence of IH is higher in patients with less subcutaneous fat, and its prevention needs to be considered in these patients.
References
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2020) Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 70:7–30. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21590
Regan TC, Mordkin RM, Constantinople NL, Spence IJ, Dejter SW Jr (1996) Incidence of inguinal hernias following radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 47:536–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80491-9
Alder R, Zetner D, Rosenberg J (2020) Incidence of inguinal hernia after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol 203:265–274. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000313
Shimbo M, Endo F, Matsushita K, Iwabuchi T, Fujisaki A, Kyono Y, Hishiki K, Muraishi O, Hattori K (2017) Incidence, risk factors and a novel prevention technique for inguinal hernia after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Urol Int 98:54–60. https://doi.org/10.1159/000448339
Ku JY, Lee CH, Park WY, Lee NK, Baek SH, Ha HK (2018) The cumulative incidence and risk factors of postoperative inguinal hernia in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Int J Clin Oncol 23:742–748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-018-1244-0
Sim KC, Sung DJ, Han NY, Park BJ, Kim MJ, Cho SB, Yang KS (2018) Preoperative CT findings of subclinical hernia can predict for postoperative inguinal hernia following robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Abdom Radiol (NY) 43:1231–1236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1270-9
Sánchez-Ortiz RF, Andrade-Geigel C, López-Huertas H, Cadillo-Chávez R, Soto-Avilés O (2016) Preoperative international prostate symptom score predictive of inguinal hernia in patients undergoing robotic prostatectomy. J Urol 195:1744–1747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.11.069
Lee DH, Jung HB, Chung MS, Lee SH, Chung BH (2013) Patent processus vaginalis in adults who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: predictive signs of postoperative inguinal hernia in the internal inguinal floor. Int J Urol 20:177–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.03118.x
Yoshimine S, Miyajima A, Nakagawa K, Ide H, Kikuchi E, Oya M (2010) Extraperitoneal approach induces postoperative inguinal hernia compared with transperitoneal approach after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Jpn J Clin Oncol 40:349–352. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyp172
Otaki T, Hasegawa M, Yuzuriha S, Hanada I, Nagao K, Umemoto T, Shimizu Y, Kawakami M, Nakajima N, Kim H, Nitta M, Hanai K, Kawamura Y, Shoji S, Miyajima A (2021) Clinical impact of psoas muscle volume on the development of inguinal hernia after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Surg Endosc 35:3320–3328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07770-7
Zendejas B, Hernandez-Irizarry R, Ramirez T, Lohse CM, Grossardt BR, Farley DR (2014) Relationship between body mass index and the incidence of inguinal hernia repairs: a population-based study in Olmsted County, MN. Hernia 18:283–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-013-1185-5
Rosemar A, Angerås U, Rosengren A (2008) Body mass index and groin hernia: a 34-year follow-up study in Swedish men. Ann Surg 247:1064–1068. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31816b4399
Ruhl CE, Everhart JE (2007) Risk factors for inguinal hernia among adults in the US population. Am J Epidemiol 165:1154–1161. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwm011
de Goede B, Timmermans L, van Kempen BJ, van Rooij FJ, Kazemier G, Lange JF, Hofman A, Jeekel J (2015) Risk factors for inguinal hernia in middle-aged and elderly men: results from the Rotterdam Study. Surgery 157:540–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2014.09.029
Hamaguchi Y, Kaido T, Okumura S, Kobayashi A, Hammad A, Tamai Y, Inagaki N, Uemoto S (2016) Proposal for new diagnostic criteria for low skeletal muscle mass based on computed tomography imaging in Asian adults. Nutrition 32:1200–1205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2016.04.003
Kobayashi J, Tadokoro N, Watanabe M, Shinomiya M (2002) A novel method of measuring intra-abdominal fat volume using helical computed tomography. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 26:398–402. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0801921
Yoshizumi T, Nakamura T, Yamane M, Islam AH, Menju M, Yamasaki K, Arai T, Kotani K, Funahashi T, Yamashita S, Matsuzawa Y (1999) Abdominal fat: standardized technique for measurement at CT. Radiology 211(1):283–286. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.211.1.r99ap15283
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
Ramshaw BJ, Tucker JG, Conner T, Mason EM, Duncan TD, Lucas GW (1996) A comparison of the approaches to laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. Surg Endosc 10:29–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649910006
Nakagami T, Qiao Q, Carstensen B, Nhr-Hansen C, Hu G, Tuomilehto J, Balkau B, Borch-Johnsen K (2003) DECODE-DECODA Study Group: age, body mass index and type 2 diabetes-associations modified by ethnicity. Diabetologia 46:1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-003-1158-9
Amato G, Sciacchitano T, Bell SG, Romano G, Cocchiara G, Lo Monte AI, Romano M (2009) Sphincter-like motion following mechanical dilation of the internal inguinal ring during indirect inguinal hernia procedure. Hernia 13:67–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-008-0433-6
Chen HR, Ting HK, Kao CC, Tsao CW, Meng E, Sun GH, Yu DS, Wu ST (2018) Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy may induce inguinal hernia within the first 2 years: an 11-year single-surgeon experience of >400 cases. Med (Baltimore)https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012208
Majima T, Yoshino Y, Matsukawa Y, Funahashi Y, Sassa N, Kato M, Gotoh M (2018) Causative factors for de novo inguinal hernia after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Robot Surg 12:277–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-017-0729-6
Lee DH, Koo KC, Lee SH, Chung BH (2014) A simple procedure to prevent postoperative inguinal hernia after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a plugging method of the internal inguinal floor for patients with patent processus vaginalis. J Urol 191:468–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.09.035
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Study conception and design: KU, TT, YY, NT, RM, HA and MO. Acquisition of data: KU and KH. Analysis and interpretation of data: KU, TT, KM, SM and TK. Drafting of manuscript: KU and TT. Critical revision of manuscript: KM and MO.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Umeda, K., Takeda, T., Hakozaki, K. et al. A low subcutaneous fat mass is a risk factor for the development of inguinal hernia after radical prostatectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 407, 3107–3112 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-022-02526-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-022-02526-4