Abstract
Purpose
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is an endocrine metabolic disease that affects women of reproductive age and is one of the main causes of anovulatory infertility. However, the cause of PCOS is yet fully understood, and genetic factors play an important role in its etiology. In this study, we reviewed the main genes involved in the etiology of PCOS and the influence of DNA methylation, aiming to answer the study´s guiding question: ‘What is the influence of DNA methylation on the main genes involved in PCOS?’.
Methods
We used the MEDLINE database, and inclusion criteria (primary and original articles, written in English, found through our entry terms) and exclusion criteria (literature reviews and articles that used animals to perform the experiments and that focused in other epigenetics mechanism without being DNA methylation) were applied.
Results
Twenty-three scientific articles, from a total of 43 articles read in full, were chosen for this study. Eighteen studies confirmed DNA methylation associated with PCOS.
Conclusion
The most relevant genes related to PCOS were INSR, LHCGR, and RAB5B, which may be epigenetically altered in DNA, with the first two genes hypomethylated and the last hypermethylated. The epigenetic changes presented in the genes related to PCOS or their promoters were only at the CpG sites.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
This systematic review on the main genes related to the PCOS physiopathology lead to a deeper understanding of the PCOS pathogenesis, and have the potential to orientate more precise diagnoses, and also help to establish more effective treatment protocols. |
Introduction
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is an endocrinological disease that affects 6–15% of women of reproductive age [1]. This syndrome has a combination of symptoms, such as hyperandrogenism, menstrual irregularities, metabolic syndrome, infertility, acne, and obesity [2]. According to the Rotterdam Consensus Workshop criteria for PCOS [3], it is necessary to identify at least two of the following characteristics: (i) clinical or biochemical signs of hyperandrogenism, (ii) oligo or anovulation, and (iii) presence of polycystic ovaries.
In addition to the heterogeneity of clinical signs and symptoms, PCOS has an etiology that is not fully understood. Thus, the study of this disease is quite challenging [1], being the object of an increasing number of studies over the years (Fig. 1). Among the possible causes of the development of PCOS, the excess production of androgens and insulin resistance have been identified as the main factors in the etiology of the disease [4].
Genetic factors also play an important role in the etiology of the disease, as alterations in gene transcription or genetic polymorphisms can cause serious transcriptional alterations related to PCOS. According to Ajmal et al. [5], the genes that encode androgen receptors, luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and leptin receptors are the most likely to be involved in the pathophysiology of the disease.
Epigenetics, which deals with processes associated with changes in the expression pattern of genes without changing the DNA nucleotide sequence [6], is a branch of genetics that is increasingly associated with the pathogenesis of PCOS [7]. Epigenetic processes include DNA cytosine methylation, modifications of histone proteins present in the nucleosome, and mechanisms mediated by noncoding RNA [8]. DNA methylation involves the addition of a methyl group on carbon 5 of cytosine through the action of DNA methyltransferases [9, 10]. Much of this methylation occurs at CpG sites, which are groups of dinucleotides, resulting in chromatin condensation. Therefore, hypermethylated DNA regions hinder gene transcription and cause gene silencing [9]. In histones, several covalent modifications can occur, such as acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, and ubiquitination [10, 11], which change the conformation and accessibility of chromatin in different ways [11]. Noncoding RNAs, in turn, are transcribed from RNAs that do not code for proteins but can, for example, interact with histone-modifying complexes or DNA methyltransferases to regulate gene expression [12].
In addition to being current, the relationship between epigenetics and PCOS is quite relevant, as changes in gene expression can generate important phenotypic changes, such as hyperandrogenism [7, 13,14,15]. Thus, the discovery and investigation of genes undergoing epigenetic alterations in tissues affected by the pathology may lead to more effective therapies for the treatment of women with PCOS [7, 13,14,15]. However, given the clinical heterogeneity of PCOS associated with the complex gene expression pathways involved in this disease, there are still gaps to be filled regarding its etiology. Therefore, this study aimed to review the main genes involved in the pathophysiology of PCOS and DNA methylation associated with the expression of these genes.
Methods
This study is a systematic review that used the updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendation [16] (Fig. 2). The study's guiding question was: “What is the influence of DNA methylation on the main genes involved in PCOS?”.
The search was carried out until June 2022 in the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE) database. The descriptors used for the search were (polycystic ovary syndrome) AND (genes) AND (epigenetics) based on the MeSH descriptors.
We included papers that met our inclusion criteria: primary and original articles, written in English, found through our entry terms. All papers included must have been published until June 2022. Our exclusion criteria were papers written in other language than English, literature reviews, and articles that used animals to perform the experiments or that focused in other epigenetics mechanism instead of DNA methylation.
For data screening and extraction, a table was filled with the quantification of the following data: author, year of publication, cited genes, methods, objectives, main genes addressed in each study, and type of epigenetic alteration involved in the expression of these genes when epigenetically altered. To be included for data screening and extraction, the paper must have analyzed the DNA of women with and without PCOS. Our primary outcome measure was the genes differentially expressed in these two groups, and this difference had to be explained by the methylation levels. Then, articles were grouped based on the similarity of the genes and their metabolic role. The data selection and extraction were done and reviewed by two authors independently. Subsequently, a third author reviewed the results and pointed out suggestions. Only the papers that met the inclusion criteria were added to this systematic review, and any inter-researched disagreement was resolved among the authors. The risk of bias in included papers was assessed by the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) [17], with modifications (Supplementary Table 1). The NOS measures the quality of nonrandomized studies based on the selection of the study groups, the comparability of the groups, and the ascertainment of either the exposure or outcome of interest for case–control or cohort studies, respectively, to be used in a systematic review [17]. This scale allowed us to evaluate all the articles with the same tool, as not all of them were case–control studies. The criteria adopted were: (1) adequate definition of cases; (2) selection of controls; (3) control for important factor; (4) explicit DNA tissue extracted reported; and (5) significant statistic difference between PCOS vs control for DNA methylation levels.
Results
In total, we identified 77 articles. After screening based on the title or abstract, 34 studies were excluded. Among these, 19 were reviews, five focused on miRNA modifications, and 10 did not focus on epigenetic modifications. Forty-three articles were read in full, and 20 papers were excluded because studied epigenetic alterations in a non-human population. Finally, 23 were eligible to answer the central question of this review. We summarized this process in a flow-diagram (Fig. 2). The studies appraisal was qualitatively done by stratifying methodological characteristics of each study, i.e., the type of study, the size of the included population, the presence of a control group, the genes involved, and their methylation and expression levels. Then, the quality of the assessment of the included studies was measured by NOS (Supplementary Table 1).
Among the included articles, the main genes affected by PCOS were identified and are detailed in Table 1. The genes for androgen receptors and those related to the regulation of ovulation and metabolism were the most recurrent.
Of the 23 selected articles, 18 confirmed the epigenetic influence on PCOS-related genes. Table 2 lists those with greater relevance to the epigenetic alterations described by the authors, with genes identified in more than one study. The epigenetic alterations presented were only in DNA, specifically CpG sites (Fig. 3), which could be hypomethylated or hypermethylated depending on the gene. Therefore, no alterations in histones were observed. In the other articles (n = 5), although the direct influence of epigenetics on the genes involved in PCOS was not found, no work contradicted the existence of this influence [18,19,20,21,22]. Among the articles that confirmed the relationship between epigenetics and PCOS genes, ten articles identified epigenetic alterations in genes related to insulin resistance [15, 23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. In total, 14 genes were identified: growth hormone releasing hormone receptor (GHRHR), peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPARG), resistin (RETN), nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase (NAMPT), brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS1), paired box 6 (PAX6), insulin receptor (INSR), G protein subunit alpha 11 (GNA11), MLX interacting protein like (MLXIPL), syntaxin binding protein 5L (STXBP5L), leptin (LEP), estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1), and lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferase 1 (LPCAT1). Other studies also identified genes related to hyperandrogenism: luteinizing hormone/choriogonadotropin receptor (LHCGR), CL2 interacting protein 3 (BNIP3), GHRHR, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) [23, 28, 32, 33].
Discussion
Given the high number of genes cited in the articles, many authors have not discussed their relationship with PCOS in depth. Wang et al. [36], for example, analyzed an extensive number of genes, 54 in all, to test their correlation with PCOS. However, not all genes showed a direct relationship between methylation and regulation of gene expression or function, or their function had not been well elucidated by methylation [36].
One of the main genes reported was the INSR gene. The promoter regions of the INSR gene were reported by Yu et al. [24] as hypomethylated in the ovarian tissue of women with PCOS compared with women without PCOS, resulting in a greater expression of the INSR gene. Jones et al. [23], in turn, verified that the INSR gene was expressed more in cumulus cells of ovarian follicles of obese women with PCOS than in non-obese women with PCOS. They presented another relevant finding that the INSR gene is hypermethylated, i.e., less expressed in metabolic tissues, such as skeletal muscle tissue, of obese women with PCOS [23]. This finding was used to confirm the existing theory of selective insulin sensitivity, since ovarian tissue is not resistant to insulin while skeletal muscle is [23].
Of the other genes that also underwent epigenetic alterations and were related to PCOS and insulin resistance, the ESR1 gene, an androgen receptor, was found to be hypomethylated in women with PCOS compared to the control group (women without PCOS), which was overexpressed [25]. The authors associated overexpression of the ESR1 gene with overexpression of lipid kinases related to the development of insulin resistance, which may be a possible explanation for the glucotoxic environment in women with PCOS [25]. Another important gene, IRS1, which is a gene that plays a central role in insulin signaling and a relationship with type 2 diabetes mellitus, was shown to be altered based on the body mass index of women [15]. The authors showed that overweight or obese women with PCOS had reduced IRS1 expression compared to others in the cohort [15]. Similarly, another gene directly correlated with type 2 diabetes mellitus, PPARG, one of the targets of pharmacological drugs used to control plasma glucose levels, was found to be hypermethylated and, therefore, less expressed in women with PCOS [15]. When studying the PPARG coactivator 1 alpha (PPARGC1A), a PPARG coactivator [37], Zhao et al. observed that women with PCOS also had this hypermethylated gene compared to healthy control women [38], indicating an epigenetic orchestration of genes with integrated functions.
A review of the articles also pointed to epigenetic alterations in genes related to the regulation of ovulation, such as the LHCGR gene, which encodes the LH and chorionic gonadotropin (CG) receptor. In two studies, elevated expression of this gene was found in women diagnosed with PCOS compared to women without PCOS due to its hypomethylation [23, 32].
Other studies have highlighted epigenetic alterations in the RAB5B, member RAS oncogene family (RAB5B), which encodes a member of the Ras-related GTPase superfamily responsible for the transport of intracellular vesicles and endosome formation related to diseases, such as obesity and type 1 diabetes mellitus [15, 23]. Jones et al. [23] reported that RAB5B was much less expressed in women with PCOS than in the control group of healthy women. Consistent with these results, Kokosar et al. [15] showed significantly lower mRNA expression of the RAB5B gene in the adipose tissue of women with PCOS compared to healthy women without PCOS.
Other genes that have undergone epigenetic alterations are BNIP3, GHRHR, and TNF, which have been correlated with the appearance of the clinical characteristics of hyperandrogenism [28, 33]. A study of BNIP3 gene, responsible for participating in the metabolism of lipid precursors in the biosynthesis of androgens, showed that hypomethylation of this gene's promoter correlated with a higher expression of BNIP3 in women with PCOS [33]. However, the discussion of the study contradicts the results presented. The authors state that a lower expression of BNIP3, related to gene hypermethylation instead of a higher expression, probably results in an excess of lipids, which contributes to hyperandrogenism [33]. Sagvekar et al. [28] observed hypomethylation and, therefore, an overexpression of GHRHR, responsible for regulating the release of somatotropin (GH) in the ovary, in granulosa cells of women with PCOS. According to the authors, this increased expression may be an indirect mediator of androgen excess in PCOS, as high levels of GH increase the sensitivity of developing ovarian follicles to gonadotropins [39]. Sagvekar et al. [28] also related the hypermethylation of the TNF gene, whose protein is responsible for suppressing the expression of LHCGR induced by FSH [40], with an indirect contribution of hyperandrogenism in PCOS [28].
In addition, Jiao et al. also reported the possibility that women with PCOS are more prone to developing cancer [41]. Patients with irregular menstruation and PCOS generally have hypomethylated global DNA in their ovarian tissues, a common feature in cancer tissues [41]. According to the authors, hormone levels in an irregular menstrual cycle are atypical, which may be a starting point for future studies that correlate cancer development in women with PCOS and hormonal changes. In the same study, the BRCA1 DNA repair associated (BRCA1) was altered in the ovarian tissues of women with PCOS at three local points (c154C, c1337G, and c2566T) [41]. It was not possible to relate these alterations to ovarian cancer, but possibly to the progression of breast cancer [41], which is an extremely relevant biomarker for future studies that have a relationship between the development of PCOS and breast cancer [41].
Upon reviewing the articles, it can be stated that epigenetic DNA methylation pathways affect the expression of the main genes involved in the etiology of PCOS. Among the various genes reported, INSR, LHCGR, and RAB5B were identified as fundamental to understanding the disease. The INSR and LHCGR genes were hypomethylated, while the RAB5B gene was hypermethylated in women with PCOS.
Data availability
All data relevant to the review are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.
References
Fauser BCJM, Tarlatzis BC, Rebar RW et al (2012) Consensus on women’s health aspects of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): The Amsterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored 3rd PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Fertil Steril 97(1):28-38.e25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.09.024
Pfieffer ML (2019) Polycystic ovary syndrome: diagnosis and management. Nurse Pract 44(3):30–35. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NPR.0000553398.50729.c0
The Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group (2004) Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 81(1):19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.10.004
Wang J, Wu D, Guo H, Li M (2019) Hyperandrogenemia and insulin resistance: the chief culprit of polycystic ovary syndrome. Life Sci 236:116940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2019.116940
Ajmal N, Khan SZ, Shaikh R (2019) Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and genetic predisposition: a review article. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X 3:100060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100060
Haig D (2004) The (dual) origin of epigenetics. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 69:67–70. https://doi.org/10.1101/sqb.2004.69.67
Vázquez-Martínez ER, Gómez-Viais YI, García-Gómez E, Reyes-Mayoral C, Reyes-Muñoz E, Camacho-Arroyo I, Cerbón M (2019) DNA methylation in the pathogenesis of polycystic ovary syndrome. Reproduction 158(1):R27–R40. https://doi.org/10.1530/rep-18-0449
Gibney ER, Nolan CM (2010) Epigenetics and gene expression. Heredity 105(1):4–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2010.54
Jones PA (2012) Functions of DNA methylation: Islands, start sites, gene bodies and beyond. Nat Rev Genet 13(7):484–492. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3230
Kim JK, Samaranayake M, Pradhan S (2009) Epigenetic mechanisms in mammals. Cell Mol Life Sci 66(4):596–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-008-8432-4
Lawrence M, Daujat S, Schneider R (2016) Lateral thinking: How histone modifications regulate gene expression. Trends Genet 32(1):42–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2015.10.007
Peschansky VJ, Wahlestedt C (2014) Non-coding RNAs as direct and indirect modulators of epigenetic regulation. Epigenetics 9(1):3–12. https://doi.org/10.4161/epi.27473
Xu J, Bao X, Peng Z, Wang L, Du L, Niu W, Sun Y (2016) Comprehensive analysis of genome-wide DNA methylation across human polycystic ovary syndrome ovary granulosa cell. Oncotarget 7(19):27899–27909. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.8544
Cui P, Ma T, Tamadon A et al (2018) Hypothalamic DNA methylation in rats with dihydrotestosterone-induced polycystic ovary syndrome: effects of low-frequency electro-acupuncture. Exp Physiol 103(12):1618–1632. https://doi.org/10.1113/EP087163
Kokosar M, Benrick A, Perfilyev A et al (2016) Epigenetic and transcriptional alterations in human adipose tissue of polycystic ovary syndrome. Sci Rep [Internet] 6:22883. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22883
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLOS Med 6(7):e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P (2021) The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality if nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. https://www.ohri.ca//programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp
Dasgupta S, Sirisha PVS, Neelaveni K, Anuradha K, Reddy AG, Thangaraj K, Reedy BM (2010) Androgen receptor cag repeat polymorphism and epigenetic influence among the south Indian women with polycystic ovary syndrome. PLoS ONE 5(8):e12401. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012401
Laisk T, Haller-Kikkatalo K, Laanpere M, Jakovlev U, Peters M, Karro H, Salumets A (2010) Androgen receptor epigenetic variations influence early follicular phase gonadotropin levels. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 89(12):1557–1563. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016349.2010.526182
Sang Q, Zhang S, Zou S et al (2013) Quantitative analysis of follistatin (FST) promoter methylation in peripheral blood of patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Reprod Biomed Online 26(2):157–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.10.011
Saenz-de-Juano MD, Ivanova E, Romero S et al (2019) DNA methylation and mRNA expression of imprinted genes in blastocysts derived from an improved in vitro maturation method for oocytes from small antral follicles in polycystic ovary syndrome patients. Hum Reprod 34(9):1640–1649. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dez121
Leung KL, Sanchita S, Pham CT et al (2020) Dynamic changes in chromatin accessibility, altered adipogenic gene expression, and total versus de novo fatty acid synthesis in subcutaneous adipose stem cells of normal-weight polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) women during adipogenesis: evidence of cellular programming. Clin Epigenetics 12(1):181. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-020-00970-x
Jones MR, Brower MA, Xu N, Cui J, Mengesha E, Chen YDI, Azziz R, Goodarzi MO (2015) Systems genetics reveals the functional context of PCOS loci and identifies genetic and molecular mechanisms of disease heterogeneity. PLOS Genet 11(8):e1005455. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005455
Yu YY, Sun CX, Liu YK, Li Y, Wang L, Zhang W (2015) Genome-wide screen of ovary-specific DNA methylation in polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 104(1):145–53.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.04.005
Lambertini L, Saul SR, Copperman AB, Hammerstad SS, Yi Z, Zhang W, Tomer Y, Kase N (2017) Intrauterine reprogramming of the polycystic ovary syndrome: evidence from a pilot study of cord blood global methylation analysis. Front Endocrinol 8:352. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2017.00352
Nilsson E, Benrick A, Kokosar M et al (2018) Transcriptional and epigenetic changes influencing skeletal muscle metabolism in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 03(12):4465–4477. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2018-00935
Jacobsen VM, Li S, Wang A, Zhu D, Liu M, Thomassen M, Kruse T, Tan Q (2019) Epigenetic association analysis of clinical sub-phenotypes in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Gynecol Endocrinol 35(8):691–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2019.1576617
Sagvekar P, Kumar P, Mangoli V, Desai S, Mukherjee S (2019) DNA methylome profiling of granulosa cells reveals altered methylation in genes regulating vital ovarian functions in polycystic ovary syndrome. Clin Epigenet 11(1):61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-019-0657-6
Echiburú B, Milagro F, Crisosto N et al (2020) DNA methylation in promoter regions of genes involved in the reproductive and metabolic function of children born to women with PCOS. Epigenetics 15(11):1178–1194. https://doi.org/10.1080/15592294.2020.1754674
Makrinou E, Drong AW, Christopoulos G et al (2020) Genome-wide methylation profiling in granulosa lutein cells of women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Mol Cell Endocrinol 500:110611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2019.110611
Mao Z, Li T, Zhao H, Wang X, Kang Y, Kang Y (2021) Methylome and transcriptome profiling revealed epigenetic silencing of LPCAT1 and PCYT1A associated with lipidome alterations in polycystic ovary syndrome. J Cell Physiol 236(9):6362–6375. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.30309
Wang P, Zhao H, Li T et al (2014) Hypomethylation of the LH/choriogonadotropin receptor promoter region is a potential mechanism underlying susceptibility to polycystic ovary syndrome. Endocrinology 155(4):1445–1452. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2013-1764
Pan JX, Tan YJ, Wang FF et al (2018) Aberrant expression and DNA methylation of lipid metabolism genes in PCOS: a new insight into its pathogenesis. Clin Epigenet 10(1):6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-018-0442-y
Pruksananonda K, Wasinarom A, Sereepapong W, Sirayapiwat P, Rattanatanyong P, Mutirangura A (2016) Epigenetic modification of long interspersed elements-1 in cumulus cells of mature and immature oocytes from patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Clin Exp Reprod Med 43(2):82–89. https://doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2016.43.282
Hiam D, Simar D, Laker R, Altıntaş A, Gibson-Helm M, Fletcher E, Moreno-Asso A, Trewin AJ, Barres R, Stepto NK (2019) Epigenetic reprogramming of immune cells in women with PCOS impact genes controlling reproductive function. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 104(12):6155-6170. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2019-01015
Wang XX, Wei JZ, Jiao J, Jiang SY, Yu DH, Li D (2014) Genome-wide DNA methylation and gene expression patterns provide insight into polycystic ovary syndrome development. Oncotarget 5(16):6603–6610. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.2224
Zhao H, Zhao Y, Ren Y, Li M, Li T, Li R, Yu Y, Qiao J (2017) Epigenetic regulation of an adverse metabolic phenotype in polycystic ovary syndrome: the impact of the leukocyte methylation of PPARGC1A promoter. Fertil Steril 107(2):467-474.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.10.039
Puigserver P, Wu Z, Park CW, Graves R, Wright M, Spiegelman BM (1998) A cold-inducible coactivator of nuclear receptors linked to adaptive thermogenesis. Cell 92(6):829–839. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81410-5
Bachelot A, Monget P, Imbert-Bolloré P, Coshigano K, Kopchick JJ, Kelly PA, Binart N (2002) Growth hormone is required for ovarian follicular growth. Endocrinology 143(10):4104–4112. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2002-220087
Nakao K, Kishi H, Imai F, Suwa H, Hirakawa T, Minegishi T (2015) TNF-α suppressed FSH-induced LH receptor expression through transcriptional regulation in rat granulosa cells. Endocrinology 156(9):3192–3202. https://doi.org/10.1210/EN.2015-1238
Jiao J, Sagnelli M, Shi B et al (2019) Genetic and epigenetic characteristics in ovarian tissues from polycystic ovary syndrome patients with irregular menstruation resemble those of ovarian cancer. BMC Endocr Disord 19(1):30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-019-0356-5
Funding
The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study writing and data management. The study conception, design, and data collection were performed by AGM and LRF. The first draft of the manuscript was written by AGM and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. AGM: data collection, management, and analysis, manuscript writing. MMS: data management and analysis; manuscript editing. LRF: data collection, management, and analysis, manuscript writing/editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest with respect to the work reported in this article. The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Miranda, A.G., Seneda, M.M. & Faustino, L.R. DNA methylation associated with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 309, 373–383 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-023-07025-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-023-07025-5