Abstract
Purpose
While the benefits of adopting a more plant-based diet for sustainability and animal welfare are clear, its long-term health impacts, including the impact on cognitive ageing, are limited studied. Therefore, we investigated the associations between plant-based diet adherence and cognitive ageing.
Methods
Data from a previous intervention study involving community-dwelling adults aged ≥ 65 years were analysed at baseline (n = 658) and after 2-year follow-up (n = 314). Global and domain-specific cognitive functioning were assessed at both timepoints. Overall, healthful and unhealthful plant-based dietary indices were calculated from a 190-item food frequency questionnaire. Multivariate-adjusted linear regression models were applied to test for associations.
Results
After full-adjustment, higher overall adherence to a plant-based diet was not associated with global cognitive function (difference in Z-score, tertile 1 versus 3 [95% CI]: 0.04 [− 0.05, 0.13] p = 0.40) or cognitive change (− 0.04 [− 0.11, 0.04], p = 0.35). Similarly, healthful and unhealthful plant-based diet indices were not associated with cognitive functioning (respectively p = 0.48; p = 0.87) or change (respectively p = 0.21, p = 0.33). Interestingly, we observed fish consumption to influence the association between plant-based diet adherence and cognitive functioning (p-interaction = 0.01), with only individuals with a fish consumption of ≥ 0.93 portion/week benefitting from better overall plant-based diet adherence (β per 10-point increment [95% CI]: 0.12 [0.03, 0.21] p = 0.01).
Conclusion
We did not demonstrate associations of a more plant-based diet with cognitive ageing. However, possibly such association exists in a subpopulation with higher fish intake. This would be in line with earlier observations that diets rich in plant foods and fish, such as the Mediterranean diet, may be beneficial for cognitive ageing.
Trial registration
Registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00696514) on June 12, 2008.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Consumers are increasingly opting for more plant-based diets, for various reasons related to sustainability, animal welfare and presumed health benefits. Nevertheless, the evidence supporting health benefits of shifting to a plant-based diet remains limited. While protective associations have been demonstrated for cardiovascular disease [1], cancer [2], and diabetes [3], little is known about the long-term effects of a shift towards a more plant-based diet on healthy ageing, including the effect on cognitive abilities.
At the same time, there is emerging evidence for beneficial effects of individual plant-derived components and foods on cognitive ageing. For example, higher consumption of polyphenols, vitamins C and E, carotenoids and unsaturated fatty acids, and plant foods rich in these plant-derived components, including vegetables, berries, nuts, olive oil, tea and coffee, have been associated to favourable brain ageing outcomes [4]. Similarly, higher adherence to the Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) and the Mediterranean-Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay (MIND) diet has been associated with better cognitive performance and slower rates of cognitive decline [5]. These dietary patterns, though not exclusively plant-based, are plant-centred and rich in brain-health promoting plant-derived components and foods.
Whereas these plant-derived components, foods and plant-centred dietary patterns have been shown to contribute to healthy cognitive ageing, there is no direct evidence to support the benefits of higher adherence to a plant-based dietary pattern. The few preliminary studies on the role of a more plant-based or vegetarian diet show promising positive associations with cognitive ageing outcomes [6,7,8,9], though not all studies support these findings [10, 11]. This merits further research on the role of a more plant-based diet on cognitive ageing.
To this end, the current study aims to investigate the association between plant-based diet adherence and cognitive functioning and 2-year cognitive decline in cognitively healthy older adults. To categorize plant-based diet adherence, we used the approach proposed by Satija et al. [12] based on an overall, healthful and unhealthful plant-based dietary index.
Methods
Participants and study design
The present study made use of data from the B-vitamins for the Prevention of Osteoporotic Fractures (B-proof) trial [13], a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial on the effect of 2 year supplementation with B-vitamins in community-dwelling adults aged ≥ 65 years with elevated homocysteine levels (12–50 μmol/L) on fracture incidence. Cognition was measured pre- and post-intervention as secondary outcome. The intervention existed of B-vitamin supplementation (400 μg folic acid and 500 μg vitamin B12) versus placebo. Participants did not suffer from renal insufficiency (creatinine > 150 μmol/L) and did not have a diagnosis of a malignancy in the past 5 years. For the present study, we used baseline data to perform a cross-sectional analysis. Next to this we performed a longitudinal analysis using follow-up data from the control group only, in order to eliminate any influence of the B-vitamin intervention, as previous research has demonstrated that this intervention may have slowed down cognitive decline in a subpopulation [14]. Data were collected between October 2008 and March 2013 in three research centres in the Netherlands: Erasmus Medical Center (Rotterdam), VU University Medical Center (Amsterdam) and Wageningen University (Wageningen). The current analysis is based on the Wageningen participants, as only this subpopulation underwent extensive cognitive testing (n = 856) and completed a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) (n = 664). Of these 664 participants, data from 6 participants were excluded due to unreliable energy intake data (for men < 800 kcal or > 4200 kcal, women < 500 kcal or > 3500 kcal, n = 2) or due to missing baseline cognition data (n = 4). The final study sample comprised 658 participants. The study was approved by the Medical Ethics committee of Wageningen University & Research and has been registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00696514. All participants had given written informed consent.
Dietary assessment
Habitual dietary intake was assessed at baseline by a 190-item FFQ, of which validity has been reported previously [15, 16]. Participants were asked how often they had consumed a food item in the past month. Portion sizes were estimated using standard portion sizes and commonly used household measures. Average daily nutrient intakes were calculated based on the Dutch food composition database [17].
As a measure of plant-based diet adherence, we calculated the overall, healthful and unhealthful plant-based diet index (PDI, hPDI, uPDI, respectively) [12]. These indices included a total of 18 food groups, of which 7 are designated as healthy plant-based groups (whole grains, fruits, vegetables, nuts, legumes, vegetable oils, and tea & coffee), 5 as unhealthy plant-based groups (fruit juices, refined grains, potatoes, sugar-sweetened beverages, and sweets) and 6 classified as animal-based food groups (animal fat, dairy, fish, meat, eggs, and miscellaneous animal-based) (Supplementary Table 1). For scoring of the indices, intake of each food group was ranked into cohort-specific quintiles and each quintile was assigned a score ranging from 1 to 5. In the PDI (overall), both healthy and unhealthy plant-based groups were scored positively (i.e. higher intakes received higher scores). For the hPDI, healthy plant food groups were given positive scores and unhealthy plant-foods received reversed scores. For the uPDI, healthy plant-foods received reversed scores and unhealthy plant foods received positive scores. Animal-based food groups were scored reversely in all three indices. The 18 food group quintile scores were summed to obtain the index scores. Alcohol and margarine intake were not included in the indices but adjusted for in the analysis, in line with previous research [12]. Furthermore, the diet indices were adjusted for energy intake using the residual method [18].
Cognitive testing
Cognitive functioning was assessed by trained research assistants with an extensive battery of cognitive tests at baseline and after 2 years. This battery included the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) (subtests immediate, delayed and recognition) [19], the Digit Span task [20], the Trail Making Test (TMT) (part A and B) [21], the Stroop Colour-Word test (part I, II and III) [22], the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) [23], and Letter Fluency [24] (Supplementary Table 2). Parallel versions were used for RAVLT, TMT and letter fluency to reduce learning effects.
To limit the number of cognition outcomes, cognitive composite scores were created. Individual cognitive test scores at baseline and after 2 yeras were converted into Z-scores based on population mean and standard deviation at baseline. The Z-scores for the TMT and Stroop Colour-Word test were reversed as lower scores represent better cognitive functioning. Individual Z-scores per test were clustered into composite scores for global and domain-specific cognitive functioning.
Finally, Mini-Mental State Examination [25] was administered following standardized procedures. This score was measured for descriptive purposes (as an indicator of the cognitive state of the participants) rather than as outcome variable.
Covariates
Information on age, gender, education level (low, middle, high), smoking status (never, former, current) was collected via questionnaires. Body weight and height were measured by trained research assistants. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg)/(height (m))2. Physical activity was assessed using the LASA physical activity questionnaire [26], and expressed in metabolic equivalent hours per week (MET h/w) covering activities of walking, cycling, sports, gardening and housework. Alcohol and margarine intake were derived from the FFQ.
Statistical analysis
Data are expressed as n (%), mean (SD) or median (IQR) unless otherwise stated. Participant characteristics between PDI tertiles were compared using ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis test for continuous variables, and chi-square test for categorical variables. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to investigate the association between plant-based diet adherence and cognition. For the cross-sectional analysis, we modelled cognitive function at baseline as a function of plant-based diet adherence (PDI, hPDI and uPDI, in tertiles and continuous), using data of the total study population. For the longitudinal analysis, the change in cognition Z-score between baseline and after 2 years was modelled as a function of plant-based diet adherence (PDI, hPDI and uPDI, in tertiles and continuous). Here, only data from the control group were used, to eliminate interference of the B-vitamin intervention. All analyses were adjusted for age (in years), gender, education level (low, middle, high), BMI (in kg/m2), physical activity (in MET h/w), smoking (never, current, former), alcohol intake (light, moderate, excessive), and margarine intake (portions/d). The longitudinal analysis was additionally adjusted for baseline cognition Z-scores. To investigate if consumption of specific animal food groups modified the association, stratified analyses by fish, meat, egg and dairy consumption (median split) were performed. P-values smaller than 0.05 were considered significant. All analyses were performed using RStudio Version 1.4.0 [27].
Results
Baseline characteristics
Participant characteristics are shown in Table 1. The mean age at baseline was 72.1 ± 5.4 years, and 59% was male. On average, participants were overweight with a mean BMI of 27.2 ± 3.9 kg/m2 and cognitively healthy as indicated by a median MMSE score of 29 [28,29,30]. Participants who fell into the lowest tertile with respect to their plant-based diet adherence were on average more often male (p = 0.02), had a higher BMI (p < 0.01) and consumed more alcohol (p < 0.01) compared to individuals classified in the tertile with highest adherence. Nutrient intake differed between plant-based diet adherence tertiles (Supplementary Table 3). Participants with higher adherence to a plant-based diet had higher intakes of carbohydrates, sugar, fibre, and folic acid, while their intakes of protein, EPA, DHA and vitamin B12 were lower.
Cross-sectional analysis
In the fully adjusted models, a higher overall adherence to a plant-based diet, as well as higher adherence to either a healthful or an unhealthful plant-based diet were not associated with global cognitive functioning (difference tertile 1 vs 3 [95% CI]: PDI 0.04 [− 0.05, 0.13] p = 0.40; hPDI − 0.03 [− 0.13, 0.06] p = 0.48; uPDI − 0.01 [− 0.10, 0.09] p = 0.87) (Table 2). With respect to domain-specific cognitive functioning, individuals with a higher overall adherence to a plant-based diet showed better episodic memory compared to individuals with lower overall plant-based diet adherence (difference tertile 1 vs 3: 0.16 [0.03, 0.28], p = 0.01) (Supplementary Table 4). However, this finding was not confirmed in the continuous analysis (p-trend = 0.08). For the remaining three cognitive domains, no associations were found between overall, healthful or unhealthful plant-based diet adherence and attention & working memory, information processing speed, or executive functioning.
Longitudinal analysis
Higher adherence to an overall or healthful plant-based diet was not associated with the rate of cognitive decline over 2 years (difference tertile 1 vs 3 [95% CI]: PDI -0.04 [-0.11, 0.04], p = 0.35; hPDI 0.05 [− 0.03, 0.12] p = 0.21) (Table 2). Individuals with the highest adherence to an unhealthful plant-based diet did not show steeper rates of cognitive decline compared to those with lowest adherence (difference T1 vs T3: − 0.04 [− 0.11, 0.04], p = 0.33), though the continuous analysis indicated a significant trend (β per 10-point increment: − 0.05 [− 0.09, 0.00], p = 0.04).
With respect to domain-specific cognitive functioning, attention & working memory was influenced by the degree of adherence to a plant-based diet (Supplementary Table 5). Better adherence to a healthful plant-based diet was associated with slower rates of cognitive decline in attention & working memory (difference tertile 1 vs 3: 0.23 [0.05, 0.41], p = 0.01, p-trend = 0.01), while higher unhealthful plant-based diet adherence was associated with faster rates of decline (difference tertile 1 vs 3: − 0.18 [− 0.36, − 0.01], p = 0.04, p-trend < 0.01). Overall adherence to a plant-based diet was not associated with a decline in attention & working memory (p-trend = 0.29).
We did not find associations between the plant-based dietary indices and episodic memory, information processing speed, or executive functioning.
Sensitivity analysis
To investigate if consumption of specific animal food groups modified the association between adherence to a plant-based diet and cognitive ageing, we performed stratified analyses by fish, meat, egg and dairy consumption based on a median split.
For the sensitivity analysis stratified by fish intake, participants were divided into two groups, those with lower and higher fish intake than the median fish intake of 0.93 portion per week. Interestingly, fish consumption appeared to influence the association between adherence to a plant-based diet and cognition (Table 3). Cross-sectionally, higher overall plant-based diet adherence was associated with better global cognitive functioning in individuals with higher fish consumption (β per 10-point increment 0.12 [0.03, 0.21], p = 0.01), while in individuals with lower fish consumption no association was observed (β per 10-point increment − 0.03 [− 0.12, 0.06], p = 0.52; p-interaction = 0.01). Longitudinally, the association between the rate of cognitive change with healthful plant-based diet adherence appeared to be modified by fish consumption in a similar manner (p-interaction < 0.01): higher healthful plant-based diet adherence was associated with slower rates of cognitive decline in individuals with higher fish consumption (0.07 [0.00, 0.14], p = 0.04), but not in those with lower fish consumption (− 0.02 [− 0.08, 0.04], p = 0.56). The association between overall plant-based adherence and cognitive decline appeared to be influenced by fish consumption as well (p-interaction < 0.01), but in the opposite direction. We did not find an association between overall adherence to a plant-based diet and cognitive decline in individuals with higher fish consumption (0.05 [− 0.04, 0.13], p = 0.27), while a negative association became apparent in individuals with lower fish consumption (− 0.10 [− 0.16, − 0.03], p < 0.01). This interaction in opposite direction was solely driven by the lower episodic memory performance of the individuals with lower fish intake, and was not observed for the other cognitive domains (data not shown).
We did not find proof for modification by the other animal food groups, i.e. meat, egg, or dairy (data not shown).
Discussion
In this cohort of Dutch cognitively healthy older adults, there was no evidence for a beneficial association between adherence to a plant-based diet and cognitive ageing. While individuals who adhered better to a plant-based diet consumed more fibre and less cholesterol and saturated fatty acids, their intakes of vitamin B12, EPA and DHA were lower. Interestingly, a higher consumption of fish, rich in the latter nutrients, appeared to partly influence the association between adherence to a plant-based diet and cognitive ageing.
To our knowledge, the association between the degree of adherence to a plant-based or vegetarian diet with cognitive ageing has been investigated in six other studies, with mixed results. Three studies demonstrated positive associations: a more plant-based dietary pattern as derived from principle component analysis was associated with better cognitive functioning in older adults [7], and higher scores on the overall and healthful plant-based diet index were associated with a lower risk of cognitive impairment in two Asian cohorts [6, 9]. At the same time, mixed results were observed in an American study [8]. Here, higher adherence to a healthful plant-based diet was associated with slower rates of decline in different cognitive domains in older African Americans, but no association was observed for White Americans in this same cohort. A null-finding comes from a small sample of non-demented community dwelling older adults, in which vegetarians did not perform better on cognitive tests or had lower odds of mild cognitive impairment compared to omnivores [11]. In addition, a higher pro-vegetarian score was not associated with 6 year change in Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status (TICS) scores in middle-aged to older adults [10]. The reason for the inconsistency in findings is hard to pinpoint, as comparability is limited due to differences in study population, duration of follow-up, exposure variable and outcome measures. Importantly, even studies that make use of the plant-based diet index as exposure variable cannot be compared directly, as this index makes use of population-specific cut-offs. An important limitation of our analysis that could be responsible for our null-finding is the duration of follow-up. Two years is relatively short to detect cognitive decline in cognitively healthy older individuals. Nevertheless, we used an extensive cognitive test battery to be able to capture subtle cognitive deteriorations rather than the more general MMSE or TICS. Furthermore, the degree of adherence to a plant-based diet was only determined at baseline. However, we do assume that our measurement represents long-term intake as dietary patterns in the elderly are fairly stable over time [28].
Whatever the true association between plant-based diet adherence and cognitive ageing may be, the lack of beneficial association in our analysis can be explained from a nutrient perspective. A diet rich in plant foods contains many nutrients that are beneficial for healthy brain ageing, including vitamin C, vitamin E, polyphenols, carotenoids and unsaturated fatty acids. These nutrients have demonstrated anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, via which they could slow down cognitive decline during ageing [4]. However, a diet predominantly containing plant foods may be lacking some crucial nutrients for optimal brain functioning, including vitamin B12, EPA and DHA. Vitamin B12, in conjunction with vitamin B6 and folic acid, plays an important role in regulating homocysteine levels, an important risk factor for cognitive decline and dementia [29]. EPA and DHA are involved in different mechanisms shown to be important to maintain brain health. For example, these long chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids are important building blocks of brain tissue, and have anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidative and vascular health promoting effects [30].
In our sensitivity analysis, we found that fish consumption modified the association between adherence to a plant-based diet and cognition, with only individuals with a higher fish consumption seeming to benefit from adhering to a plant-based diet. While fish, rich in vitamin B12, EPA and DHA, has been shown to slow cognitive decline on its own [31], combining fish with a diet rich in plant foods may have additional benefits. A multi-nutrient approach seems crucial for healthy brain ageing, as the mechanisms underlying nutrition and brain ageing are multifactorial [32]. This is also evidenced by the stronger evidence for dietary patterns versus single nutrients or foods [4] and the synergistic effect of omega-3 fatty acids and anti-oxidants [33]. Alternatively, the modification by fish may be explained by a shift in of animal-based product consumption, i.e. from meat to fish. Meat is an important source of saturated fatty acids, which have been associated to worse cognitive functioning and higher risks of mild cognitive impairment and dementia [4]. In addition, various dietary patterns low in meat have been associated with favourable brain ageing outcomes [5]. However, observational studies on the association between meat intake and cognitive ageing mostly demonstrate no associations [34], thus direct evidence for a possible negative effect of meat is lacking.
Observational studies can confirm the combined beneficial associations of a diet rich in plant foods and fish in cognitive ageing. The MedDiet, a diet rich in vegetables, fruits, whole grains, nuts and fish, has been associated with better cognitive functioning, slower rates of cognitive decline and lower chance of dementia [5]. Similar benefits have been demonstrated for the MIND diet, which composition is based on the MedDiet but with emphasis on the specific brain foods such as berries and leafy greens [5]. In addition, a study into the association between the plant-based diet index and cognitive ageing showed that plant-based dietary patterns including fish were more protective against risk of cognitive impairment compared to plant-based dietary patterns without fish [9].
While the modification by fish intake can be explained from a nutrient perspective and observational studies support this finding, it needs to be mentioned that our findings result from a subgroup analysis which limits the interpretability of these observations. Possibly, this is also an explanation for the inconsistency in findings, as we only demonstrated the modification by fish intake for PDI in the cross-sectional analysis, and hPDI in the longitudinal analysis. These results should be interpreted as preliminary and the analyses have to be replicated in other datasets before definite conclusions can be drawn.
Finally, a remark should be made with regard to the protein content of plant-based diets. Even though protein is not considered a nutrient of prime interest for the ageing brain, adequate consumption of high-quality protein is crucial for the ageing muscle and the prevention of sarcopenia [35]. Consuming a plant-based diet increases the risk of inadequate protein intake, due to the lower protein density and suboptimal essential amino acid content of plant foods [36]. Therefore, caution is warranted before advising older adults to reduce their intake of animal-based products.
In conclusion, we did not demonstrate a beneficial association of better adherence to a plant-based diet with cognitive ageing, which could be due to the lower intakes of vitamin B12, DHA and EPA in individuals with higher plant-based diet adherence. Possibly, such association between plant-based diet adherence and cognition exists in a subpopulation of fish-consumers with a fish intake of at least one portion per week. This would be in line with earlier findings that plant-centred diets that include regular fish consumption, such as the MedDiet and MIND diet, may offer benefits for the ageing brain.
Availability of data, material and code
Data and code is available upon reasonable request in consultation with the study team.
Abbreviations
- BMI:
-
Body Mass Index
- B-proof:
-
B-vitamins for the Prevention of Osteoporotic Fractures
- DHA:
-
Docosahexaenoic acid
- EPA:
-
Eicosapentaenoic acid
- FFQ:
-
Food frequency questionnaire
- MedDiet:
-
Mediterranean diet
- MIND:
-
Mediterranean-Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay
- MMSE:
-
Mini Mental State Examination
- RAVLT:
-
Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test
- SDMT:
-
Symbol Digit Modalities Test
- TICS:
-
Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status
- TMT:
-
Trail Making Test
References
Dybvik JS, Svendsen M, Aune D (2022) Vegetarian and vegan diets and the risk of cardiovascular disease, ischemic heart disease and stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Eur J Nutr. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-022-02942-8
Segovia-Siapco G, Sabaté J (2018) Health and sustainability outcomes of vegetarian dietary patterns: a revisit of the EPIC-Oxford and the Adventist Health Study-2 cohorts. Eur J Clin Nutr. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-018-0310-z
Papier K, Appleby PN, Fensom GK, Knuppel A, Perez-Cornago A, Schmidt JA, Tong TYN, Key TJ (2019) Vegetarian diets and risk of hospitalisation or death with diabetes in British adults: results from the EPIC-Oxford study. Nutr Diabetes. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41387-019-0074-0
Scarmeas N, Anastasiou CA, Yannakoulia M (2018) Nutrition and prevention of cognitive impairment. Lancet Neurol 17(11):1006–1015. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30338-7
van den Brink AC, Brouwer-Brolsma EM, Berendsen AAM, van de Rest O (2019) The Mediterranean, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH), and Mediterranean-DASH Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay (MIND) diets are associated with less cognitive decline and a lower risk of Alzheimer’s disease—a review. Adv Nutr 10(6):1040–1065. https://doi.org/10.1093/advances/nmz054
Wu J, Song X, Chen GC, Neelakantan N, Van Dam RM, Feng L, Yuan JM, Pan A, Koh WP (2019) Dietary pattern in midlife and cognitive impairment in late life: a prospective study in Chinese adults. Am J Clin Nutr 110(4):912–920. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqz150
Ramey MM, Shields GS, Yonelinas AP (2022) Markers of a plant-based diet relate to memory and executive function in older adults. Nutr Neurosci 25(2):276–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/1028415X.2020.1751506
Liu X, Dhana K, Barnes LL, Tangney CC, Agarwal P, Aggarwal N, Holland TM, Beck T, Evans DA, Rajan KB (2022) A healthy plant-based diet was associated with slower cognitive decline in African American older adults: a biracial community-based cohort. Am J Clin Nutr. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqac204
Zhu A, Yuan C, Pretty J, Ji JS (2022) Plant-based dietary patterns and cognitive function: a prospective cohort analysis of elderly individuals in China (2008–2018). Brain Behav. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2670
Munoz-Garcia MI, Toledo E, Razquin C, Dominguez LJ, Maragarone D, Martinez-Gonzalez J, Martinez-Gonzalez MA (2020) “A priori” dietary patterns and cognitive function in the SUN project. Neuroepidemiology 54(1):45–57. https://doi.org/10.1159/000502608
Gatto NM, Garcia-Cano J, Irani C, Jaceldo-Siegl K, Liu T, Chen Z, Paul J, Fraser G, Wang C, Lee GJ (2021) Vegetarian dietary patterns and cognitive function among older adults: the adventist health study-2. J Nutr Gerontol Geriatr 40(4):197–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/21551197.2021.1965939
Satija A, Bhupathiraju SN, Rimm EB, Spiegelman D, Chiuve SE, Borgi L, Willett WC, Manson JE, Sun Q, Hu FB (2016) Plant-based dietary patterns and incidence of type 2 diabetes in US men and women: results from three prospective cohort studies. PLoS Med. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002039
Van Wijngaarden JP, Dhonukshe-Rutten RAM, Van Schoor NM, Van Der Velde N, Swart KMA, Enneman AW, Van Dijk SC, Brouwer-Brolsma EM, Zillikens MC, Van Meurs JBJ, Brug J, Uitterlinden AG, Lips P, De Groot LCPGM (2011) Rationale and design of the B-PROOF study, a randomized controlled trial on the effect of supplemental intake of vitamin B 12and folic acid on fracture incidence. BMC Geriatr. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-11-80
van Soest APM, van de Rest O, Witkamp RF, Cederholm T, de Groot LCPGM (2022) DHA status influences effects of B-vitamin supplementation on cognitive ageing: a post-hoc analysis of the B-proof trial. Eur J Nutr. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-022-02924-w
Siebelink E, Geelen A, De Vries JHM (2011) Self-reported energy intake by FFQ compared with actual energy intake to maintain body weight in 516 adults. Br J Nutr 106(2):274–281. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114511000067
Streppel MT, De Vries JH, Meijboom S, Beekman M, De Craen AJ, Slagboom PE, Feskens EJ (2013) Relative validity of the food frequency questionnaire used to assess dietary intake in the Leiden Longevity Study. Nutr J. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-12-75
The Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) (2011) Nevo-tabel. Nederlands Voedingsstoffenbestand 2011. Den Haag, The Netherlands
Willett WC, Howe GR, Kushi LH (1997) Adjustment for total energy intake in epidemiologic studies. Am J Clin Nutr 65(4 SUPPL.):1220S-1228S. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/65.4.1220S
Schmidt M (1996) Rey auditory verbal learning test: a handbook. Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles
Wechsler D (1981) WAIS-R manual: Wechsler adult intelligence scale-revised. Psychological Corporation
Reitan RM (1958) Validity of the trail making test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Percept Mot Skills 8(3):271–276
Stroop JR (1935) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol 18(6):643
Smith A (1982) Symbol digit modalities test. Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles
Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Loring DW, Fischer JS (2004) Neuropsychological assessment. Oxford University Press
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatric Res 12(3):189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
Stel VS, Smit JH, Pluijm SM, Visser M, Deeg DJ, Lips P (2004) Comparison of the LASA physical activity questionnaire with a 7-day diary and pedometer. J Clin Epidemiol 57(3):252–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.07.008
R Core Team (2021) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
Jankovic N, Steppel MT, Kampman E, De Groot LC, Boshuizen HC, Soedamah-Muthu SS, Kromhout D, Feskens EJ (2014) Stability of dietary patterns assessed with reduced rank regression; The Zutphen Elderly Study. Nutrn J 13(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-13-30
Smith AD, Refsum H (2016) Homocysteine, B vitamins, and cognitive impairment. Annu Rev Nutr. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nutr-071715-050947
Dyall SC (2015) Long-chain omega-3 fatty acids and the brain: A review of the independent and shared effects of EPA, DPA and DHA. Front Aging Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2015.00052
Samieri C, Morris MC, Bennett DA, Berr C, Amouyel P, Dartigues JF, Tzourio C, Chasman DI, Grodstein F (2018) Fish intake, genetic predisposition to alzheimer disease, and decline in global cognition and memory in 5 cohorts of older persons. Am J Epidemiol 187(5):933–940. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwx330
Yassine HN, Samieri C, Livingston G, Glass K, Wagner M, Tangney C, Plassman BL, Ikram MA, Voigt RM, Gu Y, O’Bryant S, Minihane AM, Craft S, Fink HA, Judd S, Andrieu S, Bowman GL, Richard E, Albensi B, Meyers E, Khosravian S, Solis M, Carrillo M, Snyder H, Grodstein F, Scarmeas N, Schneider LS (2022) Nutrition state of science and dementia prevention: recommendations of the Nutrition for Dementia Prevention Working Group. Lancet Healthy Longev 3(7):e501–e512. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-7568(22)00120-9
Assmann KE, Adjibade M, Hercberg S, Galan P, Kesse-Guyot E (2018) Unsaturated fatty acid intakes during midlife are positively associated with later cognitive function in older adults with modulating effects of antioxidant supplementation. J Nutr 148(12):1938–1945. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/nxy206
Zhang H, Hardie L, Bawajeeh AO, Cade J (2020) Meat consumption, cognitive function and disorders: A systematic review with narrative synthesis and meta-analysis. Nutrients. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12051528
Bauer J, Biolo G, Cederholm T, Cesari M, Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Morley JE, Phillips S, Sieber C, Stehle P, Teta D, Visvanathan R, Volpi E, Boirie Y (2013) Evidence-based recommendations for optimal dietary protein intake in older people: a position paper from the prot-age study group. J Am Med Dir Assoc 14(8):542–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2013.05.021
Domić J, Grootswagers P, Van Loon LJC, De Groot LCPGM (2022) Perspective: vegan diets for older adults? A perspective on the potential impact on muscle mass and strength. Adv Nutr 13(3):712–725. https://doi.org/10.1093/advances/nmac009
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge all study participants and the dedicated B-proof research team, especially Janneke van Wijngaarden, Nikita van der Zwaluw, Elske Brouwer-Brolsma, Rosalie Dhonukshe-Rutten, Natasja van Schoor, André Uitterlinden and Paul Lips.
Funding
B-PROOF was supported and funded by The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw, grant 6130.0031), the Hague; support was also received from an unrestricted grant from NZO (Dutch Dairy Association), Zoetermeer; MCO Health, Almere; NCHA (Netherlands Consortium Healthy Ageing) Leiden/Rotterdam; Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation (project KB-15–004-003), the Hague; Wageningen University, Wageningen; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam; and Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
LCPGMdG and NvdV contributed to study conception and design of the B-PROOF trial. APMvS analyzed the data and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the revision of the manuscript and read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interest to disclose.
Ethics approval
This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Medical Ethics committee of Wageningen University and Research (ABR20783.081.07).
Consent to participate and for publication
All participants gave written informed consent.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
van Soest, A.P.M., van de Rest, O., Witkamp, R.F. et al. The association between adherence to a plant-based diet and cognitive ageing. Eur J Nutr 62, 2053–2062 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-023-03130-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-023-03130-y