Abstract
Background/Importance
There are only 56 documented cases of intravascular fasciitis, a rare variant of nodular fasciitis. Of these cases, only 2 involved the scalp. This lesion is amenable to surgical resection, making it important to differentiate it from soft tissue malignancies of the scalp.
Clinical presentation
We report an unusual case of intravascular fasciitis involving the scalp at the site of an intracranial pressure (ICP) monitor of a 13-year-old male patient. The lesion was surgically excised with no recurrence upon 1-month follow-up.
Conclusion
Intravascular fasciitis is a benign, reactive proliferation of soft tissue that may arise at sites of prior trauma. It appears as a soft, painless, mobile lesion, and immunohistochemical studies are required to differentiate it from malignant lesions. The standard of care is surgical resection of the lesion.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Background
In 1981, Patchefsky and Enzinger first described intravascular fasciitis (IVF) as a variant of nodular fasciitis. In their case series of 17 patients, they described a lesion that exhibited microscopic features of nodular fasciitis, but had an unusual association with veins and arteries [1]. IVF typically arises in the extremities, oral cavity, neck, and along major vessels, such as the aorta or internal jugular veins [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. Only 2 cases of IVF involving the scalp have been documented in the literature [5, 31]. Here, we report an unusual case of intravascular fasciitis at the site of an ICP monitor in a patient’s scalp. We also present a review of the literature pertinent to this case of intravascular fasciitis.
Case presentation
A 13-year-old male with a history of Chiari malformation, myelomeningocele status post repair, and ventriculomegaly, status post insertion of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt, presented for a follow-up 71 days after placement of a Codman CereLink ICP sensor and was found to have swelling at the incision site of the monitor. He reported no headache, nausea, vomiting, seizure, change in behavior, or cognitive decline. An X-ray of the skull was negative for retained hardware. An ultrasound of the area revealed a 1.5 × 1.5 cm hypodensity. Fine needle aspiration retrieved approximately 2 mL of blood, mildly reducing the swelling. After consulting with the patient and their parents, the decision was made to excise the mass. The patient and his parents consented to this procedure. Excision of the mass revealed a well-demarcated, soft, compressible, blue-purple spherical lesion with an intact capsule and adhesion to the underlying skull. The specimen was sent for pathological examination. Histopathologic examination revealed a vessel distended by spindled tissue culture like myofibroblasts, focal pericytoid cells and neovessels, keloidal collagen, and myxoid degeneration with extravasated erythrocytes and lymphocytes that resembled an intravascular organizing thrombus and classified as intravascular fasciitis (Fig. 1). The patient tolerated the procedure well and there were no complications. Upon 1-month follow-up, inspection of the surgical site revealed a well-healing incision with no tenderness or residual swelling.
Discussion
Nodular fasciitis is a benign soft tissue proliferation involving fibroblasts and myofibroblasts that typically arises from subcutaneous tissue, fascia, or muscles. Intravascular fasciitis is a rare type of nodular fasciitis; only 56 cases have been documented in the literature, with only 2 involving the scalp [2, 5, 31]. This lesion arises as a reactive proliferation of myofibroblast inside the vascular lumen or in the fascia investing small- and medium-sized blood vessels [25].
This form of nodular fasciitis typically arises in young adult patients with a preference for the head, neck, and extremities [1, 4, 10, 13, 23, 24, 30, 33,34,35]. When it arises on the skin, it is typically a painless, mobile mass often brought to attention for cosmesis, rather than due to physical discomfort. These lesions are typically solitary nodules, but may present as multiple or multinodular masses. In some cases, IVF arises directly from the veins (external jugular vein, femoral vein, etc.) and major arteries (aorta) [3, 17, 20, 27, 36]. In these cases, it commonly presents with symptoms of venous thrombosis or aortic dissection [3, 5, 7, 18, 22].
Microscopically, IVF is characterized by spindle cells arranged in intersecting fascicles, typically on a fibrous, vascular, or myxoid background. Mitotic figures tend to be rare or absent. Nuclear atypia is rarely seen. Immunohistochemical staining shows that the spindle cells typically stain positive for vimentin and alpha-smooth actin and negative for keratin, S100, desmin, CD31, CD34, and c-kit, indicating they are derived from myofibroblasts [10, 16, 18, 19, 23, 26, 32].
Because it tends to involve blood vessels, intravascular fasciitis can be confused with malignancy, such as fibroblastoma, myofibroblastoma, fibrosarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, or liposarcoma [12, 14, 37,38,39]. In some cases, lesions of intravascular fasciitis exhibit atypical changes such as increased mitotic activity. Despite these changes, these lesions rarely resemble malignancy through metastasis or recurrence [12].
So far, the pathogenesis of intravascular fasciitis is likely related to trauma and with a USP6 fusion. As in our case, these lesions can arise at sites of prior trauma. Other possible predisposing factors include thrombosis (specialized organizing thrombus) or pregnancy-related changes [9, 16, 21, 34, 38, 40].
Conclusion
Intravascular fasciitis of the scalp is uncommon. It can be misidentified as benign lesions, such as local thrombosis at a site of injury, or more serious conditions, such as sarcoma or mesenchymal neoplasms, that share its characteristic rapid growth. Immunohistochemistry, gross appearance, and clinical symptoms can be used to differentiate intravascular fasciitis from these lesions. Surgical excision should be the standard of care for these lesions, as rates of recurrence are very low.
Data availability
All the material is owned by the authors and/or no permissions are required.
References
Patchefsky AS, Enzinger FM (1981) Intravascular fasciitis: a report of 17 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 5:29–36
Price SK, Kahn LB, Saxe N (1993) Dermal and intravascular fasciitis. Unusual variants of nodular fasciitis. Am J Dermatopathol 15:539–543. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000372-199312000-00004
Bártů M, Dundr P, Němejcová K, Prokopová P, Zambo I, Černý Š, Intravascular fasciitis leading to an aortic dissection (2018) A case report. Cesk Patol 63:196–199
Beer K, Katz S, Medenica M (1996) Intravascular fasciitis. Int J Dermatol 35:147–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-4362.1996.tb03286.x
Chen GX, Chen CW, Wen XR, Huang B (2021) Intravascular fasciitis of the jugular vein mimicking thrombosis and sarcoma: a case report. Front Surg 8:715249. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.715249
Chi AC, Dunlap WS, Richardson MS, Neville BW (2012) Intravascular fasciitis: report of an intraoral case and review of the literature. Head Neck Pathol 6:140–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-011-0284-9
Ding X, Jiang J (2020) Intravascular fasciitis of the femoral vein mimicking thrombosis and sarcoma. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 61:373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.10.012
Freedman PD, Lumerman H (1986) Intravascular fasciitis: report of two cases and review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 62:549–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(86)90319-1
He Y, Huang G, Wang Y et al (2021) Intravascular fasciitis of the hip joint in a postpartum female: misdiagnosed as low grade fibromyxoid sarcoma. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 14:519–525
Ito M, Matsunaga K, Sano K, Sakaguchi N, Hotchi M (1999) Intravascular fasciitis of the forearm vein: a case report with immunohistochemical characterization. Pathol Int 49:175–179. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1827.1999.00842.x
Kahn MA, Weathers DR, Johnson DM (1987) Intravascular fasciitis: a case report of an intraoral location. J Oral Pathol 16:303–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0714.1987.tb00698.x
Kang JH, Kim DI, Chung BH, Heo SH, Park YJ (2018) A case report of the intravascular fasciitis of a neck vein mimicking intravascular tumorous conditions. Ann Vasc Dis 11:553–556. https://doi.org/10.3400/avd.cr.18-00065
Kato M, Watabe D, Kakisaka K, Amano H (2022) A case of intravascular fasciitis involving a finger. J Dermatol 49:e147–e148. https://doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.16283
Kim HK, Han A, Ahn S, Min S, Ha J, Min SK (2021) Intravascular fasciitis in the femoral vein with hypermetabolic signals mimicking a sarcoma: the role of preoperative imaging studies with review of literature. Vasc Specialist Int 20211:50–57
Kuklani R, Robbins JL, Chalk EC, Pringle G (2016) Intravascular fasciitis: report of two intraoral cases and review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 121:e19-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2015.05.014
Le P, Servais AB, Salehi P (2020) Intravascular fasciitis presenting as recurrent deep venous thrombosis. J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech 4:609–611
Lee HG, Pyo JY, Park YW, Ro JY (2015) Intravascular fasciitis of the common femoral vein. Vasa 44:395–398. https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a000460
Li N, Hong DK, Zheng XX, Zhou YD, Chen XS (2020) Images in vascular medicine: intravascular fasciitis of the common femoral vein mimicking deep venous thrombosis. Vasc Med 25:602–603. https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863x20938125
Lu Y, He X, Qiu Y et al (2020) Novel CTNNB1-USP6 fusion in intravascular fasciitis of the large vein identified by next-generation sequencing. Virchows Arch 477:455–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-020-02792-x
Meng XH, Liu YC, Xie LS, Huang CP, Xie XP, Fang X (2022) Intravascular fasciitis involving the external jugular vein and subclavian vein: a case report. World J Clin Cases 10:985–991. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i3.985
Min SI, Han A, Choi C, Min SK, Ha J, Jung IM (2015) Iliofemoral vein thrombosis due to an intravascular fasciitis. J Vasc Surg Cases 1:73–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsc.2014.10.003
Pan H, Zhou L, Deng C, Zheng J, Chen K, Gao Z (2020) A rare case of intravascular fasciitis misdiagnosed as deep venous thrombosis. Ann Vasc Surg 62:499.e5-499.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2019.07.005,10.1016/j.oooo.2012.03.027
Seo BF, Kim DJ, Kim SW, Lee JH, Rhie JW, Ahn ST (2013) Intravascular fasciitis of the lower lip. J Craniofac Surg 24:892–895. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182801354
Sticha RS, Deacon JS, Wertheimer SJ, Danforth RD (1997) Jr. Intravascular fasciitis in the foot. J Foot Ankle Surg 36:95–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1067-2516(97)80052-x
Takahashi K, Yanagi T, Imafuku K et al (2017) Ultrasonographic features of intravascular fasciitis: case report and review of the literature. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 3:e457–e459. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.14293
Wang L, Wang G, Gao T (2011) Myxoid intravascular fasciitis. J Cutan Pathol 38:63–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0560.2009.01445.x
Wang XJ, Liu XL, Zhang AM, Lin Y, Wu XJ (2021) Intravascular fasciitis in femoral vein: report of a case. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi 50:1379–1381. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112151-20210323-00223
Zheng Y, George M, Chen F (2014) Intravascular fasciitis involving the flank of a 21-year-old female: a case report and review of the literature. BMC Res Notes 7:118. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-118
Kahn MA, Weathers DR, Johnson DM (1987) Intravascular fasciitis: a case report of an intraoral location. J Oral Pathol Med 16:303–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0714.1987.tb00698.x
Nanaiah A, Jaiprakash P, Kudva A, Pai K (2016) Intravascular fasciitis in foot – a rare entity in a rare site. Our Dermatol Online 7:81–83
Hsiao Y, Chiu C (2013) Intravascular fasciitis of the scalp: a case report. Dermatol Sin 31:35–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsi.2012.09.004
Lu Y, He X, Qiu Y et al (2020) Correction to: Novel CTNNB1-USP6 fusion in intravascular fasciitis of the large vein identified by next-generation sequencing. Virchows Arch 3:469
Pantanowitz L, Duke WH (2008) Intravascular lesions of the hand. Diagn Pathol 3:24. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1596-3-24
Phillips BN, Eiseman AS (2014) Periorbital nodular fasciitis arising during pregnancy. Indian J Ophthalmol 62:520–521. https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.99862
Reiser V, Alterman M, Shlomi B et al (2012) Oral intravascular fasciitis: a rare maxillofacial lesion. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 114:e40–e44
Mendoza-Moreno F, Minguez-Garcia J, Diez-Gago M, Olmedilla-Arregui G, Tallon-Iglesias B, Zarzosa-Hernandez G, Solana-Maono M, Arguello-de-Andres J (2017) What do we know about intravascular fasciitis affecting inferior vena cava? management and report of a case. Int Surg J 5:325–329. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20175920
Samaratunga H, Searle J, O’Loughlin B (1996) Intravascular fasciitis: a case report and review of the literature. Pathology 28:8–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313029600169413
Sugaya M, Tamaki K (2007) Does thrombosis cause intravascular fasciitis? Acta Derm Venereol 87:369–370. https://doi.org/10.2340/00015555-0268
Sheikh S, Henderson F, Gomes MN, Montgomery E (1999) Intravascular fasciitis clinically mimicking an axillary peripheral nerve sheath tumor: a case report and review of the literature. Vas Surg 33:439–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/153857449903300425
Lu Y, He X, Qiu Y, Chen H, Zhuang H, Yao J, Zhang H (2020) Novel CTNNB1-USP6 fusion in intravascular fasciitis of the large vein identified by next-generation sequencing. Virchows Arch 477:455–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-020-02792-x
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Cyril Tankam and Yaw Tachie-Baffour performed the literature review, prepared the figures, and wrote the main manuscript. Yaw Tachie-Baffour, Elias Rizk, Mason Stoltzfus, and Julie Fanburg-Smith assisted in the literature review and writing of the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript and approved the document for submission.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable since no identifying images or other personal or clinical details of participants that compromise anonymity were included in this manuscript; therefore, no consent was obtained for publication.
Consent for publication
The authors consent that this document should be published.
Conflict of interest
I declare that the authors have no competing interests as defined by Springer, or other interests that might be perceived to influence the results and/or discussion reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Tankam, C.S., Stoltzfus, M.T., Tachie-Baffour, Y. et al. Intravascular fasciitis of the scalp as a complication of ICP monitor placement: a case report and review of the literature. Childs Nerv Syst 39, 3617–3620 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-023-06050-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-023-06050-8