Abstract
Preventive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for non-culprit lesions after primary PCI remains controversial in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We analyzed whether PCI for non-culprit lesions would be associated with a better long-term prognosis in very elderly (≥85 years) patients. This study included 91 consecutive patients with ACS (mean age, 88.2 ± 3.0, 52 % male). We investigated the association of residual lesions with 1-year mortality. Culprit lesions affected the left anterior descending artery (LAD) in 50 patients, the left circumflex artery (LCx) in 29, and the right coronary artery (RCA) in 31. Residual lesions affected LAD in 20 cases, LCx in 22, and RCA in 21 patients. Residual lesions in LAD were associated with a higher 1-year mortality (p = 0.013), whereas residual lesions in LCx or RCA were not (p = 0.547 and 0.473, respectively). A Cox regression model demonstrated that patients with residual lesions in LAD had an increased risk of 1-year mortality compared with those without residual lesions (hazard ratio, 2.39; 95 % confidence interval, 1.16–4.96; p = 0.019). Therefore, the option to not treat residual lesions in LAD of patients with PCI may be associated with a higher 1-year mortality. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Medical progress has extended the human lifespan in developed countries. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has become much safer and less invasive; therefore, very elderly (≥ 85 years) individuals have been increasingly referred for PCI, particularly in the clinical setting of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). In these patients, coronary angiography (CAG) sometimes shows multiple lesions [1]. The conventional strategy for ACS suggests that only the culprit lesion should be treated, followed by PCI for non-culprit lesions at a later session [2–4]. However, PCI for both culprit and non-culprit lesions during the initial procedure may be beneficial in reducing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) [5, 6]. In very elderly patients, non-culprit lesions are often treated only with optimal medication therapy in the absence of chest discomfort because of these patients’ advanced age. As some elderly patients find it difficult to walk, chest discomfort becomes less likely to occur. It remains unclear whether we should perform PCI for non-culprit lesions.
Materials and methods
Study design
This retrospective study included 91 consecutive patients who were ≥85 years of age and admitted to the Kyorin University Hospital for ACS between 2007 and 2014. All patients underwent primary PCI. We reviewed all medical records to retrieve the patients’ clinical information. We also evaluated their CAG, chest X-rays, and blood tests and categorized the patients according to the Killip classification. [7] The institutional ethical review board at the Kyorin University School of Medicine approved the study.
Evaluation with CAG
We studied the culprit, non-culprit, and residual lesions in each patient. We defined the culprit lesions as the ones whose stenosis or occlusion was causing ACS. Lesions with ≥75 % stenosis or complete occlusion that were not associated with the development of ACS were defined as non-culprit lesions. Residual lesions were non-culprit lesions that were not treated with PCI during the admission. The decision of whether the lesion was a culprit or non-culprit lesion was based on findings from CAG, electrocardiogram, and echocardiography, according to the assessments of two interventionists. We performed quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) to evaluate each stenosis or occlusion, using the software Qangio XA, version 7.1 (Medis, Leiden, the Netherlands). Culprit lesions in the left anterior descending artery (LAD), left circumflex artery (LCx), and right coronary artery (RCA) are represented as cLAD, cLCx, and cRCA, respectively, whereas residual lesions in these arteries are represented as rLAD, rLCx, and rRCA, respectively.
Procedure
We evaluated the success rate of primary PCI for ACS. The procedure was deemed successful when achieving a <30 % angiographic residual stenosis and a thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grade 3 (TIMI3) after treatment of the culprit lesion. [8] Complete revascularization was defined as the absence of a ≥75 % stenosis in LAD, LCx, and RCA, and the absence of a ≥50 % stenosis in the left main trunk (LMT) after PCI. We also evaluated the type of device used for the intervention. The procedures included plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA), a bare metal stent (BMS), and drug-eluting stent (DES). The type of DES was also recorded.
Clinical outcome
We assessed the 1-year mortality and its associations with the presence of non-culprit or residual lesions. The cause of death was also evaluated. Furthermore, we evaluated whether PCI for the non-culprit lesion was related to the improvement in activities of daily living (ADL) at discharge. ADL was assessed at admission and discharge using the Barthel index [9]. According to the study, we defined the ADL as “good” when the Barthel index was ≥85. Data on mortality were obtained from medical records or telephone conversation with the patients’ families.
Statistical analysis
Numerical data with normal distribution are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Otherwise, data are presented as median and interquartile range (quartile 1–3). Categorical variables were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test and chi-square test and are expressed as absolute numbers or percentages. Continuous variables were analyzed using unpaired Student’s t test or Mann–Whitney test. Bonferroni corrections were used for post hoc tests, and Kaplan–Meier statistics were used to estimate the cumulative 1-year mortality. The risk of mortality was assessed using the Cox regression analysis, which was adjusted for age, gender, and Killip classification and expressed as a hazard ratio (HR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI). To evaluate the HR of each vessel with a culprit lesion, we used as a reference a relevant non-culprit vessel or a vessel with no lesions. To assess HR of each vessel with residual lesions, the reference was the lesion treated with PCI or the relevant vessel with no lesions. As for the association between a residual lesion and ADL on discharge, we used logistic regression analysis to calculate the odds ratios (ORs), which was adjusted for age, gender, and ADL on admission. This analysis was restricted to patients discharged alive from the hospital. Differences were regarded significant when p < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using the software Stata (version 10; StataCorp, College Station, Texas, USA).
Results
Angiographic characteristics
The present study included 91 very elderly patients (mean age, 88.2 ± 3.0 years; range, 85–99 years; 52 % male). The median (interquartile range) Barthel index on admission in all patients was 100 (90–100). The median follow-up duration was 341 days (15–1302 days; mean, 681 days). Thirty-three patients (36 %) died in the year following the development of the ACS; 25 (76 %) of whom died of a cardiac disease. The culprit lesions were located in LAD in 50 cases, in LCx in 10 cases, and in RCA in 31 cases. QCA results were as follows: LAD, 96 % (90–100 %); LCx, 99 % (91–100 %); and RCA, 97 % (91–100 %) (p < 0.001). LCx was significantly narrower than LAD and RCA (p < 0.001 and 0.002, respectively). We did not detect culprit lesions in LMT; however, non-culprit lesions were found in LMT in eight patients. Single-vessel disease was detected in 45 patients, double-vessel disease in 25, and triple-vessel disease in 21. The success rate of PCI was 91 %. The guide wire could not advance beyond the culprit lesion in one patient, and the final coronary flow was <TIMI3 in seven patients. Complete revascularization was not performed in 43 patients during hospitalization. In cases in which complete revascularization was performed, the culprit and non-culprit lesions were not treated simultaneously. Residual lesions were located as follows: LAD, 20 patients; LCx, 22 patients; and RCA, 21 patients. QCA results showed the following degrees of stenosis: LAD, 84 ± 13 %; LCx, 86 ± 13 %; and RCA, 80 ± 13 %; (p = 0.206). Patients’ characteristics were classified according to the culprit and residual lesions (Tables 1, 2, respectively). Left ventricular ejection fraction was low, and heart failure was more common in patients with cLAD than in those with other lesions. DES and BMS were used at the primary PCI in 32 and 53 patients, respectively. There were no significant differences in the characteristics between the groups with and without rLAD, except for dyslipidemia and use of beta-blockers.
Relationship between angiographic findings and 1-year mortality
Cox regression analysis of 1-year mortality is shown in Table 3. The culprit lesions were not associated with the 1-year mortality. However, rLAD was associated with higher 1-year mortality (p = 0.013) (Fig. 1), whereas rLCx and rRCA were not (p = 0.547 and p = 0.473, respectively). All patients with rLAD (n = 11) died from heart failure with reduced ejection fraction within 2 months. The Cox regression model demonstrated that patients with residual lesions in LAD had an increased risk of 1-year mortality compared with that in those without rLAD lesions (HR, 2.39; 95 % CI, 1.16–4.96; p = 0.019). The significance persisted after adjustment for age, gender, and Killip classification (HR, 3.00; 1.41–6.37; p = 0.004). Patients without rLAD included those with cLAD who underwent PCI (n = 46) and those without cLAD on admission (n = 25). There was no significant difference in 1-year mortality between both groups (p = 0.831). Each patient in the non-rLAD group had a better 1-year prognosis than those with rLAD (n = 20) (patients without cLAD, p = 0.034 and patients with cLAD who underwent PCI, p = 0.034) (Fig. 2).
Although the number at risk reduced, the Cox regression model demonstrated that compared with patients without rLAD, those with rLAD had an increased risk of 3-year mortality (HR, 2.43; 95 % CI, 1.21–4.87; p = 0.012).
Association between residual lesion and ADL
The median Barthel index on admission in the present study was 100 (90–100). Therefore, ADL was classified as good in most patients. The presence of rLAD was associated with worse ADL at discharge (adjusted OR, 5.77; 95 % CI, 1.02–32.6; p = 0.047). Both rLCx and rRCA were not related to ADL.
Clinical impact of the Killip classification on 1-year mortality
A higher Killip class was significantly associated with worse 1-year prognosis (p = 0.001). Patients with Killip I (n = 45) or II (n = 13) had a better prognosis than those with Killip III (n = 8) or IV (n = 3) (OR, 4.61; 95 % CI 1.49–14.64; p = 0.002).
Discussion
Prognostic impact of residual lesions
The present study revealed that an rLAD is associated with a 1-year mortality even in very elderly patients. Patients without rLAD included those with cLAD who were treated with PCI and those without cLAD at the first CAG. The 1-year prognosis for both was similar. Thus, PCI may improve the prognosis in patients with LAD lesions and equate the prognosis to those without LAD lesions. Conversely, rLCx and rRCA were not related to the 1-year mortality.
The clinical significance of PCI differs according to the stability of the ischemia. In patients with stable angina pectoris, PCI is useful in alleviating the symptoms, but not in prolonging the lifespan in most cases. In patients with ACS, PCI is useful in improving both symptoms and lifespan. The COURAGE trial demonstrated no difference in myocardial infarction and major cardiovascular events between optimal medical treatment (OMT) with and without PCI in patients with stable angina pectoris. [10] Nevertheless, the results in the PCI group were not similar to those in the OMT group in all cases. A substudy of the COURAGE trial, which included patients who underwent myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography, suggested that a ≥10 % ischemia is associated with worse event-free survival. [11] Hachamovitch et al. also found increasing survival benefit of PCI over medical treatments when patients had moderate-to-severe ischemia. [12] These studies suggest that a large area of the myocardium at risk is associated with a poor prognosis. There have been no randomized trials comparing PCI to OMT in patients with isolated culprit lesions in LAD. However, LAD generally feeds a broader territory than other vessels. Therefore, rLAD may be related to 1-year mortality. As the ischemic areas in LCx and RCA are usually narrower than those in LAD, rLCx and rRCA do not affect 1-year mortality. According to previous studies as well as the present one, OMT without PCI may be appropriate in very elderly patients with rLCx or rRCA if they do not experience chest discomfort.
Differences in clinical impact among the culprit lesions
Here, there was no significant difference in 1-year mortality associated with culprit lesions. In the setting of ACS, lesions in LCx and RCA can be lethal. Fatal complications include free wall rupture in those with an acute occlusion of LCx and right ventricular infarction in those with an acute occlusion of RCA. Lethal ventricular tachyarrhythmia can occur in both. As culprit lesions in vessels other than LAD can contribute to in-hospital mortality, there may be no difference in mortality among culprit lesions.
Is complete revascularization required for a better prognosis?
There is controversy as to whether and when PCI should be performed for non-culprit lesions in the clinical setting of ACS. The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines state that “Primary PCI should not be performed in a noninfarct artery at the time of primary PCI in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who are hemodynamically stable,” and “PCI is reasonable in a noninfarct artery at a time separate from primary PCI in patients with intermediate- or high-risk findings on noninvasive testing.” [13] In accordance with the ACC/AHA guidelines, several studies have failed to indicate any benefit of PCI for non-culprit lesions during hospitalization. [14–17] Conversely, some studies have shown a benefit of complete revascularization. A meta-analysis by Sarathy et al. has revealed that the treatment of non-culprit lesions, in addition to culprit lesions, is associated with lower all-cause mortality in patients with STEMI. [18] Other studies [14, 19] have suggested that PCI for multiple lesions during primary PCI is related to a higher mortality. However, staged PCI for non-culprit lesions after the primary PCI resulted in a lower mortality. Kornowski et al. have demonstrated that the mortality of patients following the deferred PCI strategy might be lower than that in those following the simultaneous PCI strategy. [20] According to these studies, angioplasty for non-culprit lesions during primary PCI appears to be associated with a higher mortality, whereas PCI for non-culprit lesions at a different time does not appear to be harmful. The present study did not show worsened outcomes associated with complete revascularization compared with those associated with culprit-only revascularization. The patients included in this study underwent PCI for non-culprit lesions at a different time from the primary PCI. The optimal timing to perform PCI for non-infarct arteries remains unclear. However, according to the findings of the present study, which showed cardiac death occurring within 2 months after discharge, a subsequent PCI for non-infarct arteries should be planned within 2 months after the primary PCI.
Association between rLAD and ADL
Residual lesions in LAD were independently associated with worse ADL on discharge. PCI for rLAD may be associated not only with prognosis at 1 year but also with a better ADL on discharge.
Study limitation
The small sample size in the present study could have limited our ability to detect other potential prognosis, such as residual lesions in LCx and RCA. Further studies with a sufficient number of very elderly patients may be required to confirm our findings.
To confirm the benefits of preventive PCI, a prospective study comparing patients with and without PCI for rLAD is required, although it may be difficult to conduct such studies among very elderly patients.
References
Naito R, Miyauchi K, Konishi H, Tsuboi S, Ogita M, Dohi T, Kajimoto K, Kasai T, Tamura H, Okazaki S, Isoda K, Yamamoto T, Amano A, Daida H (2015) Comparing mortality between coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents in elderly with diabetes and multivessel coronary disease. Heart Vessels. doi:10.1007/s00380-015-0746-1
Cavender MA, Milford-Beland S, Roe MT, Peterson ED, Weintraub WS, Rao SV (2009) Prevalence, predictors, and in-hospital outcomes of non-infarct artery intervention during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry). Am J Cardiol 104:507–513
Vlaar PJ, Mahmoud KD, Holmes DR Jr, van Valkenhoef G, Hillege HL, van der Horst IC, Zijlstra F, de Smet BJ (2011) Culprit vessel only versus multivessel and staged percutaneous coronary intervention for multivessel disease in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a pairwise and network meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:692–703
Abe D, Sato A, Hoshi T, Takeyasu N, Misaki M, Hayashi M, Aonuma K (2014) Initial culprit-only versus initial multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results from the Ibaraki Cardiovascular Assessment Study registry. Heart Vessels 29:171–177
Kowalewski M, Schulze V, Berti S, Waksman R, Kubica J, Kolodziejczak M, Buffon A, Suryapranata H, Gurbel PA, Kelm M, Pawliszak W, Anisimowicz L, Navarese EP (2015) Complete revascularisation in ST-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Heart 101:1309–1317
Wald DS, Morris JK, Wald NJ, Chase AJ, Edwards RJ, Hughes LO, Berry C, Oldroyd KG (2013) Randomized trial of preventive angioplasty in myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 369:1115–1123
Killip T 3rd, Kimball JT (1967) Treatment of myocardial infarction in a coronary care unit. A 2-year experience with 250 patients. Am J Cardiol 20:457–464
Politi L, Sgura F, Rossi R, Monopoli D, Guerri E, Leuzzi C, Bursi F, Sangiorgi GM, Modena MG (2010) A randomised trial of target-vessel versus multi-vessel revascularisation in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: major adverse cardiac events during long-term follow-up. Heart 96:662–667
Higuchi S, Kabeya Y, Matsushita K, Taguchi H, Ishiguro H, Kohshoh H, Yoshino H (2016) Barthel index as a predictor of 1-year mortality in very elderly patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome: better activities of daily living, longer life. Clin Cardiol 39:83–89
Boden WE, O’Rourke RA, Teo KK, Hartigan PM, Maron DJ, Kostuk WJ, Knudtson M, Dada M, Casperson P, Harris CL, Chaitman BR, Shaw L, Gosselin G, Nawaz S, Title LM, Gau G, Blaustein AS, Booth DC, Bates ER, Spertus JA, Berman DS, Mancini GB, Weintraub WS (2007) Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 356:1503–1516
Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Maron DJ, Mancini GB, Hayes SW, Hartigan PM, Weintraub WS, O’Rourke RA, Dada M, Spertus JA, Chaitman BR, Friedman J, Slomka P, Heller GV, Germano G, Gosselin G, Berger P, Kostuk WJ, Schwartz RG, Knudtson M, Veledar E, Bates ER, McCallister B, Teo KK, Boden WE (2008) Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy. Circulation 117:1283–1291
Hachamovitch R, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, Cohen I, Berman DS (2003) Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation 107:2900–2907
O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, Casey DE Jr, Chung MK, de Lemos JA, Ettinger SM, Fang JC, Fesmire FM, Franklin BA, Granger CB, Krumholz HM, Linderbaum JA, Morrow DA, Newby LK, Ornato JP, Ou N, Radford MJ, Tamis-Holland JE, Tommaso CL, Tracy CM, Woo YJ, Zhao DX, Anderson JL, Jacobs AK, Halperin JL, Albert NM, Brindis RG, Creager MA, DeMets D, Guyton RA, Hochman JS, Kovacs RJ, Ohman EM, Stevenson WG, Yancy CW (2013) 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 127:e362–e425
Bainey KR, Mehta SR, Lai T, Welsh RC (2014) Complete vs culprit-only revascularization for patients with multivessel disease undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am Heart J 167(1–14):e12
Bauer T, Zeymer U, Hochadel M, Mollmann H, Weidinger F, Zahn R, Nef HM, Hamm CW, Marco J, Gitt AK (2013) Prima-vista multi-vessel percutaneous coronary intervention in haemodynamically stable patients with acute coronary syndromes: analysis of over 4.400 patients in the EHS-PCI registry. Int J Cardiol 166:596–600
Zeymer U, Hochadel M, Thiele H, Andresen D, Schuhlen H, Brachmann J, Elsasser A, Gitt A, Zahn R (2015) Immediate multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention versus culprit lesion intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: results of the ALKK-PCI registry. EuroIntervention 11:280–285
Hassanin A, Brener SJ, Lansky AJ, Xu K, Stone GW (2015) Prognostic impact of multivessel versus culprit vessel only percutaneous intervention for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease presenting with acute coronary syndrome. EuroIntervention 11:293–300
Sarathy K, Nagaraja V, Kapur A, Szirt R, Raval J, Eslick GD, Burgess D, Denniss AR (2015) Target-vessel versus multivessel revascularisation in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Heart Lung Circ 24:327–334
Jensen LO, Thayssen P, Farkas DK, Hougaard M, Terkelsen CJ, Tilsted HH, Maeng M, Junker A, Lassen JF, Horvath-Puho E, Sorensen HT, Thuesen L (2012) Culprit only or multivessel percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease. EuroIntervention 8:456–464
Kornowski R, Mehran R, Dangas G, Nikolsky E, Assali A, Claessen BE, Gersh BJ, Wong SC, Witzenbichler B, Guagliumi G, Dudek D, Fahy M, Lansky AJ, Stone GW (2011) Prognostic impact of staged versus “one-time” multivessel percutaneous intervention in acute myocardial infarction: analysis from the HORIZONS-AMI (harmonizing outcomes with revascularization and stents in acute myocardial infarction) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:704–711
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interests to disclose.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Higuchi, S., Kabeya, Y., Matsushita, K. et al. Clinical impact of non-culprit lesions on 1-year mortality in very elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome. Heart Vessels 32, 8–15 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-016-0833-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-016-0833-y