Abstract
Introduction and objectives
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy remains a challenging procedure primarily due to difficulties obtaining access. Indeed, few urologists obtain their own access due to difficulties using a fluoroscopic or ultrasonic based antegrade puncture technique. Herein we report the first experience using holmium laser energy to obtain access in a retrograde fashion.
Methods
After a pretreatment week of tamsulosin 0.4 mg/day (one center only) and following a documented sterile urine, a total of ten patients underwent retrograde holmium laser-assisted endoscopic-guided nephrostomy access in a prone split leg position.
Results
In nine of ten patients, ureteroscopic guided, holmium laser access via an upper pole posterior calyx was achieved. In one patient, the laser tract could not be safely dilated and antegrade endoscopic and fluoroscopic guided access was performed. The mean operative time was 202 min; the mean fluoroscopy time was 32 s (6/9 cases). The mean pre-operative stone volume was 14,420 mm3. CT imaging on post-operative day 1 revealed 6/6 patients had residual stone fragments with total mean volume of 250 mm3 (96% reduction); there were no residual fragments in three patients who were evaluated with non-CT radiographic imaging (KUB). There was a single complication requiring angioembolization due to a subcapsular hematoma with associated secondary tearing of an inter-polar vessel remote from the nephrostomy site.
Conclusions
Holmium laser-assisted endoscopic-guided retrograde access in a prone split-leg position was successfully performed at two institutions. The accuracy of nephrostomy placement and lessening of fluoroscopy time are two potential benefits of this approach.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
With increasing incidence of nephrolithiasis, the volume of ureteroscopy (URS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) continue to rise [1]. PCNL is the gold standard treatment for large renal calculi [2]. Throughout the United States, 80% of PCNL nephrostomies access is established by interventional radiology (IR) using an antegrade approach [3,4,5,6]. However, despite its lack of frequency, urologist-acquired percutaneous access is actually superior in terms of stone-free rates and access-related complications. The challenges of antegrade targeting of a commonly non-dilated calyx and the skills necessary in the fluoroscopic or ureteroscopic manipulation of guidewire placement, tract dilation, and positioning of the working sheath combine to dissuade the majority of urologists from obtaining their own percutaneous access.
Lawson et al. described the retrograde approach as an alternative to the traditional antegrade access and was later modified by Hosking in the modified lithotomy position [7, 8]. Recently, this technique has been performed with ureteroscopic assistance to facilitate accurate passage of the Lawson puncture wire (“rocket wire”) in both the modified lithotomy position as well as in the prone split leg position [9,10,11]. Subsequently, we hypothesized that the Lawson wire could be replaced with the 365 µm holmium laser fiber to obtain access with minimal fluoroscopy and potentially less chance of an errant path; the latter plagued the Lawson approach given the errant path of the rocket wire in cases of morbidly obese patients. After initial cadaver work, we proceeded with clinical application of retrograde holmium laser-assisted endoscopic-guided nephrostomy access.
Methods
Patient selection and pre-operative planning
Patients undergoing PCNL underwent pre-operative computed tomography (CT) scans with axial, coronal and sagittal images. After taking into account the surrounding organs and ensuring there is no overlying liver, bowel or spleen posterior to the kidney, tract length to the selected calyx of entry, and angles necessary to access the stone via the selected point of entry are determined. For this initial experience, we routinely selected patients with a tract length < 10 cm on the sagittal CT imaging for an upper pole posterior calyx planned site of entry as this provided the shortest distance from the flank to the kidney as well as the most direct route of access to the renal pelvis, ureteropelvic junction, and ureter (Fig. 1).
At one center (UCI), all seven patients were pre-treated with oral tamsulosin 0.4 mg/day for a week prior to surgery to potentially facilitate passage of a 16 French ureteral access sheath [12]. Urine cultures were confirmed to be negative and patients were given ciprofloxacin (or alternative antibiotic if allergic to ciprofloxacin) 500 mg PO twice daily for 7 days prior to surgery to minimize risk of urinary sepsis. At the second center (HPTU), all three patients were documented to have sterile cultures and patients were given Cefazolin 2 g intravenously pre-operatively; no preoperative tamsulosin was given.
Technique: University of California-Irvine
Patient positioning and ureteroscopy
After administration of general anesthesia, the patient was placed in the prone position with lower extremities split on spreader bars; the genitalia and ipsilateral flank were prepared and draped. Flexible cystoscopy was performed and an Amplatz Super Stiff ™ guidewire (Boston Scientific®, Natick, MA, USA) was inserted up to the level of the kidney. An 8/10-French ureteric dilator set (Boston Scientific®, Natick, MA, USA) was inserted over the guidewire up to the level of the kidney under fluoroscopic guidance. Retrograde pyelography was performed to map the calices, then the 8/10-French ureteric dilator was removed and the bladder was drained with a 12-French Foley catheter for the duration of the case. A 16-French 35 cm ureteric access sheath (UAS) (Cook Medical®, Bloomington, IN, USA) was placed up to the level of the ureteropelvic junction over the Amplatz Super Stiff guidewire under fluoroscopic guidance. The flexible ureteroscope, with a preloaded 365 µm holmium laser probe, was introduced and the calices were inspected.
Holmium laser-assisted endoscopic-guided retrograde access
Two cc of air were injected (air congregates in the most posterior calyx of the upper pole when the patient is in the prone position thus guiding the puncture) via the ureteroscope (Cobra—Richard Wolf®, Vernon Hills, IL, USA or Flex Xc—Karl Storz Endoscopy-America Inc., El Segundo, CA, USA) and with combined ureteroscopic and fluoroscopic guidance, a posterior calyx was identified (Fig. 2). Once the tip of the ureteroscope was fluoroscopically confirmed to be positioned directly posterior, and beside/into the air bubble, respirations were suspended during exhalation to prevent pleural injury and the 365 µm laser fiber at 1 J and 10 Hz (i.e. same settings we use for performing a laser endopyelotomy) was activated and advanced directly through the posterior upper calyceal fornix towards the flank. The continuous audible sound of the laser and its forward progress confirmed ongoing advancement of the laser probe until the laser cut through the skin. The exiting tip of the laser fiber was grasped and 8–10 in. of the laser fiber were delivered onto the flank. An incision was made on either side of the laser fiber (Fig. 3). The obturator of the 18-gauge nephrostomy needle was then advanced over the laser fiber and into the collecting system, under fluoroscopic and endoscopic control. Once the obturator was seen in the collecting system, the laser fiber was removed from the ureteroscope. A 260 cm exchange guidewire was inserted through the ureteroscope and “docked with” the nephrostomy needle’s obturator; the 260 cm guidewire was advanced until roughly 50 cm of it was lying on the flank. The nephrostomy needle was removed. The skin incision was extended to 1 cm; the 5 mm fascial incising needle (Cook Medical®, Bloomington, IN, USA) was passed over the exchange guidewire to cut the lumbodorsal fascia. Under endoscopic guidance, the 10 mm nephrostomy balloon (NephroMax™—Boston Scientific®, Natick, MA, USA) was advanced over the exchange guidewire until it was seen to enter the calyx. The tract was dilated and a 30-French nephrostomy access sheath was positioned under endoscopic control within the collecting system.
Lithotripsy, stone fragment extraction, stent insertion, and sealing of nephrostomy access
Lithotripsy was performed using a 26-French Karl Storz Inc. nephroscope and LithAssist™ (Cook Medical®, Bloomington, IN, USA) with a 1000 µm laser fiber (1–2 J at 10–20 Hz). All accessible stone fragments were removed after which flexible nephroscopy, and flexible ureteroscopy were used to remove any remaining stones until the kidney appeared to be endoscopically and fluoroscopically stone free. The access sheath was then withdrawn, the entire ureter was evaluated with antegrade flexible ureteroscopy using the Post-Ureteroscopic Lesion Scale (PULS) (UCI only). The 12-French Foley catheter was removed and a ureteric stent was inserted over the 260 cm exchange guidewire; the proximal coil was positioned under nephroscopic control as the guidewire was withdrawn and the distal coil was confirmed by fluoroscopy. A 16-French Foley was inserted for post-operative bladder drainage. Five cc of Surgiflo® (Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc., Cincinnati, OH, USA) was instilled as the 30F Amplatz sheath was removed; flank compression was applied for 10 min. The skin incision was closed with 4-0 Monocryl and Dermabond (Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc., Cincinnati, OH, USA).
Results
Nine of ten patients underwent successful holmium laser endoscopic guided retrograde access (Table 1). The remaining patient underwent an uncomplicated standard endoscopic-guided antegrade access as the laser path wandered, and was deemed too long for routine dilation. Among the nine laser access patients, the mean operative time was 202 min and mean fluoroscopy time was 32 s (only 6 cases had this information available). The mean pre-operative stone volume was 14,420 mm3 with mean density of 1016 HU units. The mean tract length was 8.4 cm, and 33% of the nephrostomy tracts were supracostal. A CT scan on post-operative day 1 revealed that all 6 UCI patients had residual stone fragments ranging from 2.1 to 8.8 mm; at HPTU KUB revealed no residual fragments in all 3 patients. The mean absolute stone volume reduction was 96%. There were no ureteral urothelial tears noted during ureteral access sheath withdrawal, the average PULS score was 1.25.
There was one major complication (Clavien IIIa) in an ASA 3 patient. The patient was noted to have a subcapsular hematoma on her postoperative CT scan with an attendant drop in her hemoglobin. An angiogram showed bleeding from an interpolar vessel located well away from the upper pole nephrostomy tract. She was embolized and transfused with two units of packed red blood cells. The remainder of her hospital course was unremarkable.
Discussion
Accurate placement of the nephrostomy tract is essential for performing a successful PCNL. Although urologists are exposed to PCNL cases during their residency, only a few are comfortable in achieving their own percutaneous access [13,14,15]. As such, today, the majority of percutaneous accesses for PCNL are obtained by interventional radiologists [3, 4].
An alternative to the traditional antegrade approach was first described by Lawson et al. in 1983 when they developed the retrograde Lawson rocket wire technique [8]. After placement of a retrograde catheter into the calyx of choice, the rocket wire was passed through the catheter and out the flank. This retrograde access for PCNL provided a short learning curve (10 cases) [16, 17]. Moreover, with flexible ureteroscopy the most appropriate calyx could be selected under direct visualization, and thus further reduce the need for fluoroscopy [7, 10, 17]. Further, by passing the rocket wire through the ureteroscope, the platform became much more stable opening up the use of this approach in some obese patients [9, 18].
Building on our prone Lawson rocket wire retrograde experience, we hypothesized the holmium laser would “cut” through tissue as it was passed and result in a more consistent path. In June 2017, we were able to do a holmium laser retrograde exit in a cadaver. Concurrently Uribe and colleagues performed the first successful clinical case using holmium laser-assisted endoscopic retrograde access [19]. Based on our laboratory work and Dr. Uribe’s report, we proceeded with holmium laser-assisted retrograde access in seven patients.
There are several potential benefits of using the holmium laser to establish retrograde access. First, the holmium laser is already familiar and widely available to urologists. Second, the holmium laser is often used for both lithotripsy during the PCNL, and can be used for lithotripsy of stones blocking the renal pelvis allowing ureteroscopic access to the calyx of choice [11]; thus, its use for retrograde access incurs no additional costs. Third, the forward cutting nature of the laser allows it to pass through the tissues with minimal resistance, potentially creating a straighter and more direct tract than with a rocket wire. Fourth, the prone position does not preclude standard (or endoscopic) antegrade access. Lastly, in our experience, this approach has markedly reduced the amount of fluoroscopy time to achieve percutaneous renal access. Indeed, our average fluoroscopy time for laser assisted endoscopic access is 32 s (range 5–64 s). This is far less than the 82–204 s commonly reported for antegrade fluoroscopic access [20,21,22].
We successfully achieved laser retrograde access in nine of ten patients. In the non-successful patient, there was likely an error in aiming the tip of the ureteroscope prior to laser advancement resulting in an excessively long tract that we elected to not dilate. This patient underwent an uncomplicated antegrade endoscopic guided PCNL. Of note, no bleeding was noted within the collecting system upon withdrawal of the laser fiber. To preclude this problem from recurring, we presently check the position of the tip of the ureteroscope in both the AP and lateral planes to make sure the tip of the ureteroscope is pointing directly posterior or posterior and slightly cephalad (< 10°) prior to advancement of the laser fiber. Further, using a single or preferably a dual-lumen ureteroscope allows for more rigidity during initial targeting and maintaining the desired angle.
There are several potential drawbacks to the laser approach that need further review. First, since the laser fiber is not radiopaque, its forward progress is signaled by the continuous sound of the activated laser and minimal resistance during its advancement. Resistance to passage or absence of the laser-firing sound, signals either a “cracked” laser fiber or contact with a rib. In the latter case, the laser cannot fire, as there is not a sufficient fluid medium [23]. Second, a “cracked” laser fiber is a major concern as it could result in retention of a foreign body. To date we have noted in two cases that when the fiber cracks, the outer coating remains sufficiently intact such that the fiber, if it has not exited the skin, can be withdrawn into the ureteroscope and removed. Alternatively, if the fiber has exited the skin, it can be pulled out further until the cracked area is delivered onto the flank and then cut and removed. A third concern is that as the laser reaches the skin, one must be cautious to avoid the theoretical risk of eye injury from continued firing of the laser [24]. However, this complication only occurs if the activated laser tip is within 5 cm of the surgeon’s eyes [25]. To date, use of the holmium laser for lithotripsy has resulted in no reports of laser eye injury [26]. Lastly, the directly posterior targeting of the ureteroscope within the calyx is similar to the bullseye technique (versus triangulating) which could result in increased bleeding as there may be more torque placed on the site of renal access [27]. To date we have not tried to use a triangulation method with the laser approach.
Conclusion
The novel approach of using an ureteroscopic holmium laser-assisted retrograde technique to establish a percutaneous tract may be a viable alternative to antegrade access. Early experience shows a short learning curve and reduced fluoroscopic use.
References
Scales CD, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS (2012) Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol 62(1):160–165
Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, Monga M, Murad MH, Nelson CP et al (2016) Surgical management of stones: American urological association/endourological society guideline, part II. J Urol 196(4):1161–1169
Bird VG, Fallon B, Winfield HN (2003) Practice patterns in the treatment of large renal stones. J Endourol 17(6):355–363
Jayram G, Matlaga BR (2014) Contemporary practice patterns associated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy among certifying urologists. J Endourol 28(11):1304–1307
Tomaszewski JJ, Ortiz TD, Gayed BA, Smaldone MC, Jackman SV, Averch TD (2010) Renal access by urologist or radiologist during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 24(11):1733–1737
Watterson JD, Soon S, Jana K (2006) Access related complications during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: urology versus radiology at a single academic institution. J Urol 176(1):142–145
Hosking DH (1986) Retrograde nephrostomy: experience with 2 techniques. J Urol 135(6):1146–1149
Lawson RK, Murphy JB, Taylor AJ, Jacobs SC (1983) Retrograde method for percutaneous access to kidney. Urology 22(6):580–582
Kaler KS, Kim W (2017) V2-8 a new twist on an old technique: endoscopic-guided lawson retrograde nephrostomy access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy in prone position. J Endourol 31(S2):A420
Kawahara T, Ito H, Terao H, Yoshida M, Ogawa T, Uemura H et al (2012) Ureteroscopy assisted retrograde nephrostomy: a new technique for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). BJU Int 110(4):588–590
Wynberg JB, Borin JF, Vicena JZ, Hannosh V, Salmon SA (2012) Flexible ureteroscopy-directed retrograde nephrostomy for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: description of a technique. J Endourol 26(10):1268–1274
Kaler KS, Safiullah SM, Patel RM et al (2017) MP75-14 the impact of one week of preoperative Tamsulosin on deployment of 16-French ureteral access sheaths. J Urol 197:e1008–e1009
de la Rosette JJ, Laguna MP, Rassweiler JJ, Conort P (2008) Training in percutaneous nephrolithotomy—a critical review. Eur Urol 54(5):994–1001
Lee CL, Anderson JK, Monga M (2004) Residency training in percutaneous renal access: does it affect urological practice? J Urol 171(2 Pt 1):592–595
Tanriverdi O, Boylu U, Kendirci M, Kadihasanoglu M, Horasanli K, Miroglu C (2007) The learning curve in the training of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 52(1):206–211
Wong HY, Hinson JL, Griffith DP (1995) Retrograde nephrostomy: advantages, disadvantages, and the learning curve. J Endourol 9(6):461–463
Wynberg JB, Paik LJ, Odom BD, Kruger M, Atalla CS (2014) Body mass index predicts outcome of ureteroscopy-assisted retrograde nephrostomy for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 28(9):1071–1077
Patel RM, Okhunov Z, Clayman RV, Landman J (2017) Prone versus supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: what is your position? Curr Urol Rep 18(4):26
Uribe CA, Osorio HD, Benavides JA, Martinez CH (2017) V2-5 laser assisted retrograde ureteroscopy for percutaneous nephrostomy: a new and safer technique for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 31(S2):A418
Agarwal M, Agrawal MS, Jaiswal A, Kumar D, Yadav H, Lavania P (2011) Safety and efficacy of ultrasonography as an adjunct to fluoroscopy for renal access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). BJU Int 108(8):1346–1349
Elkoushy MA, Shahrour W, Andonian S (2012) Pulsed fluoroscopy in ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology 79(6):1230–1235
Lantz AG, O’Malley P, Ordon M, Lee JY (2014) Assessing radiation exposure during endoscopic-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Can Urol Assoc J 8(9–10):347–351
Zhang X, Chen C, Chen F, Zhan Z, Xie S, Ye Q (2016) In vitro investigation on Ho: YAG laser-assisted bone ablation underwater. Lasers Med Sci 31(5):891–898
Smalley PJ (2011) Laser safety: risks, hazards, and control measures. Laser Ther 20(2):95–106
Villa L, Cloutier J, Comperat E, Kronemberg P, Charlotte F, Berthe L et al (2016) Do we really need to wear proper eye protection when using holmium: YAG laser during endourologic procedures? Results from an ex vivo animal model on pig eyes. J Endourol 30(3):332–337
Althunayan AM, Elkoushy MA, Elhilali MM, Andonian S (2014) Adverse events resulting from lasers used in urology. J Endourol 28(2):256–260
Tepeler A, Armagan A, Akman T, Polat EC, Ersoz C, Topaktas R et al (2012) Impact of percutaneous renal access technique on outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 26(7):828–833
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaler, K.S., Parkhomenko, E., Okunohov, Z. et al. Ureteroscopic holmium laser-assisted retrograde nephrostomy access: a novel approach to percutaneous stone removal. World J Urol 36, 963–969 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2223-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2223-9