Introduction

Passive muscle stiffness is a promising indicator for evaluating the mechanical properties of skeletal muscle tissue due to the strong linear relationship with passive muscle force [1,2,3]. Quantification of passive muscle stiffness is particularly relevant in clinical settings because increased stiffness contributes to muscle adaptation and decreased passive range of motion (RoM) in joints, which disrupts motor function over time, and affects the quality of life adversely [4, 5]. Increased muscle stiffness is correlated with disease stage [6]. Noninvasive measurements of passive muscle stiffness could provide a longitudinal assessment of muscle function in monitoring disease progression and treatment response [7, 8].

Various elastography methods have been developed to estimate muscle stiffness: magnetic resonance elastography, vibration elastography, compression elastography, and shear wave elastography (SWE) [1]. Compared with other methods, SWE has gained attention: (i) for its low dependence on operator skills; because external compression or vibration is not needed [1, 9]; (ii) because it is superior to magnetic resonance elastography with regard to cost and accessibility [1, 2]. Furthermore, SWE tracking is sufficiently fast that it can be implemented on the scanner to provide real-time quantitative metrics of tissue stiffness [10]. SWE has been applied for muscle diseases, including Duchenne muscular dystrophy, GNE-related myopathy, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, stroke, muscle atrophy, muscle injury, and cerebral palsy [4,5,6, 11,12,13].

Muscle disorders can affect people of all ages. Changes in passive muscle stiffness are not only pathologic, but also affected by the maturation and aging of muscle [14, 15]. Age-related changes in muscle stiffness may contribute to understanding of the development of musculoskeletal disorders with age. However, there are minimal data on passive muscle stiffness and how it alters with age [14, 15].

When measuring passive muscle stiffness, muscle stretching is conducted by adopting specific static postures or dynamic movements [3, 8, 9, 16]. The calf muscle crosses both the knee and ankle joints, so the extent of stretching of gastrocnemius medialis (GM) is determined by the position of both joints. Various stretching methods have been applied to study the passive muscle stiffness of GM. Chino and colleagues [16] quantified the stiffness of GM with that of the ankle in 30° plantarflexion (PF), a neutral anatomic position, and 20° dorsiflexion (DF) with a fully extended knee in 52 healthy young adults. Nordaz and coworkers [9] carried out dynamic passive stretching at a very slow velocity (0.5° s−1) from 40° in PF until 95% of the maximal RoM with a fully extended knee in nine healthy young male adults. Maïsetti and collaborators [3] measured the passive stiffness of GM by undertaking slow (2°/s) passive loading/unloading cycles between 40° of PF and 80% of the maximal RoM in DF at different knee angles (0°, 15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, and 80°, where 0° = knee is fully extended) in seven healthy young men. Studies have evaluated few cases and not covered the age range of children, adults, and older patients. Moreover, comparing the results from different studies is difficult because of the inconsistency in the stretching protocol.

We investigated age-related changes on passive muscle stiffness in healthy people and the shear modulus of different age groups.

Methods

Ethical approval of the study protocol

All procedures were approved by the Ethics Review Board of Shenzhen Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (KYLS20190201) in Shenzhen, China. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. In the children group, written informed consent was obtained from both children and their parent or guardian.

Study design

This study had a cross-sectional design. We recruited healthy participants from three age groups: children (< 16 years), middle-aged (30–40 years), and older (> 55 years). We tested the passive stiffness of GM at a series of stretching levels in a single visit. Assessments were conducted from July 2019 to January 2020.

Participants

In this prospective study, participants’ eligibility was based on the following: (i) age (as detailed above); (ii) normal motor function of both legs. Individuals were excluded if they (i) were professional athletes and (ii) reported a history of neuromuscular/musculoskeletal disease, or injury/surgery to the lower extremities. We recorded the circumference of the left calf at the area of the greatest bulk. Height and weight were measured, and the body mass index (BMI) was calculated accordingly.

Instrumentation

A passive exercise machine (YTK-E; Zhengda Medical Co., Ltd.) was used to control the ankle angle and angular velocity of the joint during stretching by a microchip program (Fig. 1a). Surface electromyography (Trigno™ Wireless EMG) ensured muscle relaxation during stretching (Fig. 1b). An ultrasound scanner (Resona v7.0; Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co., Ltd.) with a multifrequency linear transducer (L11-3U; frequency range = 3–11 MHz) was used to measure the shear modulus of GM (Fig. 1c).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Experimental setup. a A passive exercise machine was used to control the ankle angle and joint angular velocity during stretching. b Surface electromyography was used to ensure muscle relaxation during stretching. c An ultrasound scanner (Resona v7.0) with a linear ultrasound transducer (L11-3U) was applied to collect SWE images

Pretest

To ensure safety and confirm the preset parameters covered the maximum available RoM, a passive stretching pretest was imposed on four volunteers (two middle-aged authors of this manuscript and their children aged 8 years) using the passive exercise machine. The cycle of ankle movement was carried out from PF 40° to DF 30° and back at a constant velocity of 2°/s (Fig. 2) [11]. The knee was bent at 30° flexion to avoid GM overstretching at DF positions [11, 17]. An ankle angle of 0° was defined when the sole of the foot was perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the calf.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Stretching protocol. A cycle of ankle movements was confirmed from plantarflexion 40° to dorsiflexion 30°, with the knee bent at 30° flexion

Experimental setup for SWE

Participants lay supine on a flat bed with their left leg relaxed on the passive exercise machine and their left foot secured firmly to the footplate by two straps. The axes of the footplate and ankle were aligned visually as close as possible. Participants were instructed to stay as relaxed as possible through passive stretching.

The stretching cycle was repeated thrice with the first cycle regarded as “preconditioning” [9]. Each cycle started with a B-mode acquisition over the area of the greatest GM bulk under the musculoskeletal preset. Copious amounts of gel were applied to minimize the pressure of the transducer on the skin. The transducer was held manually and oriented perpendicular to the skin and parallel to GM fascicles [18] consistently during stretching. Once the B-mode image had been optimized, a rectangular elastography window (13 × 7 mm2) was superimposed in the center of the GM belly. SWE movies were captured synchronously with each stretching cycle. Two stretching cycles produced two sets of SWE movies for further analyses. The procedure was carried out by two examiners with > 10 years’ experience of analyzing ultrasound findings of musculoskeletal areas and 4 years’ experience of evaluating SWE images.

During collection of SWE movies, an investigator monitored real-time surface electromyography continuously to ensure that there was no subtle movement of the leg or unconscious contraction of GM.

Measurement of the shear modulus

SWE readings were represented as shear modulus (kPa). The shear modulus was measured at the exact moment correspondent with a series of ankle PF–DF angles (PF 40°, PF 30°, PF 20°, PF 10°, 0°, DF 10°, DF 20°, DF 30°) (Table 1). A 6-mm circular region of interest [8] was positioned in the elastography box, carefully avoiding tendons, aponeuroses, and fascial tissue. The scanner provided the corresponding shear modulus automatically. The shear modulus was measured in the two sets of SWE movies and the average value of the two measurements adopted for analyses. GM thickness was also measured.

Table 1 SWE images at different ankle angles. Subject A, an 8-year-old male. Subject B, a 30-year-old female. Subject C, a 55-year-old female. PF, plantarflexion; DF, dorsiflexion

Evaluation of intra-observer and inter-observer reproducibility

Intra-observer and inter-observer agreement of measurements were assessed in 30 participants selected randomly. The same observer (L.X.) measured the elastic modulus twice to assess intra-observer reproducibility. Assessment of intra-observer agreement was undertaken during different sessions. The second measurement was undertaken 1 week after the first measurement, and the information of the participant was blinded to the observer. To assess inter-observer reproducibility, shear modulus measurements were made by a second observer (P.M.) who was blinded to the results of the first observer (L.X.).

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were undertaken using SPSS v21.0 (IBM) and MedCalc v18.2.1 (MedCalc). The difference in shear modulus measurements between males and females was compared with the independent t test. One-way ANOVA was used to determine if there was a significant difference in passive muscle stiffness among the three age groups, with post hoc Tukey-corrected pairwise multiple comparisons to highlight differences between one group and another group. The normal distribution was tested by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Homogeneity was examined by Levene’s test. Also, 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) and the intra-class correlation coefficient were used to assess the reproducibility of results of the shear modulus test. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

A total of 86 healthy people (44 males and 42 females) were enrolled consecutively. There were 27 children (6–12 years), 31 middle-aged individuals (30–40 years), and 28 older people (55–66 years). Demographic characteristics (age, sex) and physical measurements (height, weight, body mass index (BMI), calf circumstance, GM thickness) are presented in Table 2.

Table 2 Demographic characteristics and physical measurements

The shear modulus and 95% CIs at each ankle angle of the three groups are listed in Table 3. In the three groups, passive muscle stiffness increased as the ankle DF increased (Table 3 and Fig. 3), except for a low ebb of shear modulus that appeared at PF 20° in the middle-aged group (Table 3). There was no significant difference between sexes (Table 4).

Table 3 Comparison of the shear modulus in the three groups at different ankle angles
Fig. 3
figure 3

Comparison of the shear modulus in the three age groups. PF, plantarflexion; DF, dorsiflexion

Table 4 Comparison of the shear modulus between males and females

The one-way ANOVA results of the muscle assessments in Table 3 showed no significant difference in passive muscle stiffness among the three age groups at ankle angles of PF 40°, PF 30°, PF 20°, PF 10°, and 0° (p > 0.05). As the ankle underwent DF and the stretching level of GM increased, a significant difference was observed among the three age groups at ankle angles of DF 10°, DF 20°, and DF 30° (p < 0.05). Further analyses via post hoc multiple comparisons revealed that the difference was not significant between the children group and middle-aged group at an ankle angle of DF 10°, and that the shear modulus increased significantly in the older group compared with that in the children group and middle-aged group. At ankle angles of DF 20° and DF 30°, the shear modulus was the greatest in the older group, followed by the middle-aged group and children group (p < 0.05). The shear modulus (in kPa) was 24.28 ± 7.72, 28.39 ± 6.85, and 34.89 ± 8.48 at an ankle angle of DF 20° in the children, middle-aged, and older groups, respectively (p = 0.000). The shear modulus (in kPa) was 38.97 ± 7.44, 46.17 ± 8.35, and 56.80 ± 10.23 at an ankle angle of DF 30° in the children, middle-aged, and older groups, respectively (p = 0.000). The inter-class correlation coefficient ranged from 0.8853 to 0.9675 and from 0.8928 to 0.9419 for intra-observer and inter-observer measurements of the shear modulus, respectively (Table 5).

Table 5 Intra-observer and inter-observer reproducibility at different ankle angles

Discussion

SWE showed promise in quantifying passive muscle stiffness in the present study. By adopting a protocol of dynamic stretching, we explored the effect of age on passive muscle stiffness and measured the shear modulus of GM at a series of ankle angles in healthy participants of different ages.

Skeletal muscle becomes stiffer as it is stretched. This phenomenon has been verified by studies on healthy muscles using different methods. The shear modulus of biceps brachii has been shown to be higher when it was stretched at full extension of the elbow compared with the value obtained at 90° elbow flexion [14]. Koo and colleagues undertook elasticity measurements by SWE at tibialis anterior in 20 healthy adults with the ankle positioned from 50° PF to up to 15° DF: increased elasticity was found as the level of stretching increased [17]. An identical pattern was found in a study by Akagi and colleagues using real-time tissue elastography images on GM in 12 healthy young males [19]. Our study revealed an increase in passive muscle elasticity in the RoM we tested, which is consistent with the previous studies [14, 17, 19]. As a muscle is stretched, it reacts with increasing passive resistance. Greater recruitment of muscle fibers against stretching can lead to a longitudinal high elastic modulus [1]. In addition, the decrease in muscle cross section during stretching can induce transverse stress and increased intramuscular pressure [20, 21]. Longitudinal tension and transverse stress can contribute to increased muscle stiffness [9].

In the middle-aged group, a low ebb of shear modulus appeared at PF 20°, which might suggest it to be the optimal slack angle. PF 25° (at 90° of knee flexion) has been suggested to be the optimal slack angle of GM [22]. The set of knee angles was inconsistent with our stretching protocol, so a possible bias may exist for the optimal slack angle. However, a low ebb was not observed in the children group or older group. We considered that the optimal slack angle might have been missed owing to an increment of 10° between two measurements in our study.

In health, the response of a muscle to stretching is moderate within a normal range and is affected by the mechanical, material, and architectural properties of the muscle [23]. Structural and compositional changes, such as alterations in the composition and function of the fiber type, intramuscular fat content, capillary density, intramuscular connective tissue, or collagen [14], would affect muscle stiffness. Changes in the structure and composition of muscle persist throughout life at the physiologic level [14, 15, 24]. Age-related passive muscle stiffness has been studied by various scholars using various skeletal muscles. Brandenburg and colleagues [8] showed increasing passive stiffness with age in lateral gastrocnemius muscle at an ankle angle of DF 10°, but the result was not significant, which might due to the small sample size (20 children) and age range (2–12.6 years). Eby and collaborators quantified passive stiffness in biceps brachii of 113 adults (20–90 years) at full extension of the elbow, and concluded that the passive shear modulus increased with advancing age [14]. Alfuraih and coworkers [15] investigated the effect of aging on passive stiffness of quadriceps at static passive stretching (knee flexion of 90°) for people aged 20–94 years, and found no significant difference with age. The studies mentioned above measured passive muscle elasticity at several static stretched postures [8, 14, 15], so sufficient information on muscle characteristics could not be provided. In reality, muscles tend to be stretched dynamically at a series of stretching levels. We investigated passive muscle stiffness through dynamic stretching and obtained data of a series of stretching levels. Our results showed that passive muscle stiffness increased with age and that the differences between age groups were pronounced only after reaching a certain degree of stretching. Our results reflect the effect of muscle maturation and the aging process on passive stiffness of GM.

The cause of increased passive muscle stiffness with age may be related to the ongoing alteration of muscle structure/composition during muscle maturation and the aging process. Children are in a rapid development phase. Their muscle fiber is finer with more interstitial components than that of adults. The sparse form may serve a buffer gap to induce lower transverse stress during stretch process. Muscles mature gradually after adolescence and maintain a stable level. A gradual loss of muscle fibers begins at ~ 50 years of age and continues such that by 80 years of age, ~ 50% of fibers are lost from limb muscles [25]. The aging process causes muscle atrophy and a concomitant increase in intramuscular adipose tissue and connective tissue [24, 26]. Remodeling of skeletal muscle compromises muscle extensibility further, resulting in greater resistance at the same level of stretching. These phenomena may explain the increased passive muscle stiffness in the older group in our study.

Clinical disorders, diseases, and injury to muscles of patients of all ages would also alter the structure and composition of muscle [27], along with muscle stiffness [4, 6, 28]. For example, Duchenne muscular dystrophy and cerebral palsy occur in children, who deteriorate progressively into adulthood; stroke, Parkinson’s disease, and muscle atrophy occur in older people. Scholars have observed increased muscle stiffness in the diseases mentioned above [4,5,6, 29, 30] and illustrated that passive muscle stiffness can reflect disease severity [4, 5, 30, 31]. We measured the shear modulus of people of different ages, which could provide baseline information for assessment of muscle diseases in individuals of different ages.

Our study had two main limitations. First, the number of enrolled participants was small. Extending this study to different age groups to follow changes accurately during the entire muscle maturation process and aging process would be interesting. Second, we focused on the age-associated difference of passive stiffness of GM at a series of stretching levels. Further investigation is needed to evaluate the effect of other variables (e.g., sporting activity, muscle mass, dominant leg) on passive muscle stiffness.

Conclusions

We demonstrated that passive stiffness of GM increased with age and the difference was pronounced only after reaching a certain degree of stretching. The shear modulus of people of different ages may provide baseline information for assessment of muscle diseases of individuals of different ages.