Abstract
Bradyrhizobium is a genus of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) that have been studied for several decades mainly for the ability to fix diazotrophic nitrogen after having been established endosymbiotically inside root nodules of the legumes of Fabaceae. The aim of this work was to evaluate the capability of Bradyrhizobium to promote the growth of crops belonging to other families, in this case, rice (Oryza sativa), both in laboratory and in field trials. For laboratory test, surface-sterilized rice seeds were soaked with cultures of each strain and planted in pots. Plant length and dry weight were measured after 35 days. For the field test, rice seeds of varieties Yeruá La Plata and Gurí INTA were inoculated with the three best strains observed in the laboratory test and planted in plots. After 60 days of growth, plant length and dry weight were measured. At harvest time, we measured the dry weight of the aerial part, yield and thousand-grain weight. Inoculation with any of the three species described provoked significant increments compared to the uninoculated control at least in one of the parameters measured, both in the laboratory and in the field tests. Bradyrhizobium japonicum E109 was the strain that promoted rice growth the most in the lab while Bradyrhizobium elkanii SEMIA 587 was the strain that promoted rice growth the most in the field, with increments in yield of approximately 1000 kg/ha. Data obtained suggest that the Bradyrhizobium species promoted all rice growth and yield.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
It has been predicted that the world population will reach 11 billion by the year 2100 [1], 87% of it will be living in developing countries. Within many of these countries, food demand is on rise and rice is a staple food [2] for more than 3 billion. Since there is not much more surface to be cultivated the only way to increase production is by increasing yields of crops and this might be achieved by improving crop management as well as soil nutrients.
Many agricultural systems managements led to the loss of soil fertility (mainly macronutrients) due to subsequent harvests in monoculture strategies and often soils are amended with mineral fertilizers. Among them, nitrogen, the most limiting factor of growth and yield, is applied in 2–3 splits while 15 to 20 kg of N is needed for every ton of rice yield [3]. However, fertilizers pose a threat to environment since water sources might be contaminated with nitrates as well as the atmosphere that might be contaminated with N oxides as well as CH4. In addition, their cost cannot be afforded by farmers.
The availability of environmentally friendly and cheaper fertilizers might lead to increase production within developing countries, protecting soils and water sources. Because of this, scientists are concentrating their efforts in developing bio-fertilizers such as microbes with the ability to mineralize nutrients within industrial wastes and unavailable soil nutrients, produce plant hormones and/or compete with plant pathogens [4,5,6,7].
The main source for the isolation and further development of biofertilizer is the soil as it contains plant growth-promoting (PGP) bacteria, microorganisms that colonize plant roots enhancing plant growth [8]. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) predominantly live in the rhizosphere but also can grow within, or around tissues and stimulate plant growth by different mechanisms such as phosphate solubilization, siderophore production, biological nitrogen fixation, production of 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase, quorum sensing (QS) signal interference and inhibition of biofilm formation, phytohormones production, antifungal activity, production of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), induction of systemic resistance (ISR), promoting beneficial plant–microbe symbioses and interference with pathogen toxin production, among others [9,10,11]. These mechanisms were grouped in direct and indirect ones, while the former ones occur within the plant affecting directly plant metabolism, the latter ones occur outside of the host. While direct mechanisms include a balance of plant growth regulators, biological nitrogen fixation, phosphate solubilization, production of phytohormones such as indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), cytokinins and gibberellins, indirect mechanisms include synthesis of siderophores, chitinases, glucanases and/or antibiotic molecules that trigger ISR. PGPR modulates plant stress markers under abiotic stress and production of ACC deaminase.
Biological nitrogen (N) fixation, mainly through the legume-rhizobium symbiosis, has been a way humanity increased productivity in sustainable agricultural systems [12]. Because of this, inoculants of nitrogen-fixing bacteria are produced on large scale in many countries.
Bradyrhizobium japonicum [13], Bradyrhizobium elkanii [14] and Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens [15, 16], commonly known as rhizobia, even though they are not the only symbionts of soybean, they have been used the most to formulate commercial inoculants in the main producing area of soybean around the world that includes Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay and Uruguay. Bradyrhizobium include slow-growing [17, 18], gram-negative soil bacteria that develop nodules on soybean. There is an ample diversity of these organisms that is shown by the broad array of serological groups (serogroups) [18]. Genotypic and phenotypic variations of B. japonicum strains have been reported in terms of DNA fingerprints, internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences between 16 and 23SrDNA, denitrification, symbiotic associations and nitrogen fixation [19].
It has already been demonstrated that Bradyrhizobium not only benefits legumes in terms of biological nitrogen fixation but it also promotes the growth of many crops [20]. Chebotar et al. [21] found that co-inoculation of B. japonicum and rhizobacteria increased nodulation, nitrogenase activity, plant growth and yield of soybean. Antoun et al. [20] inoculated radishes with 266 collection strains of rhizobia and bradyrhizobia and found that while some bacteria reduced plant growth others promoted it, among the latter ones a B. japonicum was identified and it was found that it might enhance growth of maize.
More recently, Azorhizobium, Bradyrhizobium, and Rhizobium strains have been identified as endophytes of different rice cultivars and species growing naturally or under cultivation in different geographical regions around the world [22]. It has been recognized that these legume symbionts might promote the growth of non-legumes, like cereals such as rice (Oryza breviligulata and Oryza sativa), wheat and maize. Chaintreuil et al. [23] found photosynthetic Bradyrhizobium strains living endophytically within stems of the legume Aeschynomene, as well as rice O. breviligulata.
Regarding rice plants, Mano and Morisaki [24] found Bradyrhizobium japonicum and Bradyrhizobium elkanii living associated with the roots of rice. Furthermore, Sreevidya et al. [25] showed that rhizobia colonized root epidermal cells, including root hairs of transgenic rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. Murasaki) whose growth was significantly promoted by Rhizobium leguminosarum var. viciae or Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDA110, respectively.
Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of inoculating commercial strains of Bradyrhizobium japonicum, Bradyrhizobium elkanii and Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens on rice in laboratory as well as in field experiments and determine the plant growth-promoting effect of Bradyrhizobium strains on rice plants.
Materials and Methods
Strains, Growth and Rice Inoculation Conditions
Five commercial Bradyrhizobium strains, two Bradyrhizobium japonicum (SEMIA 5079 and E109), two Bradyrhizobium elkanii (SEMIA 587 and SEMIA 5019) and one Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens (SEMIA 5080) from the collection of the Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina, were used in this study.
Bradyrhizobium strains stock cultures were kept in the freezer at − 80 °C with 10% polyethylene glycol (PEG). Slants of the isolate were done on Yeast Extract Mannitol medium (YEM) [26] that were inoculated and grown for a week in the darkness at 28 °C. 5 mL cultures of each isolate were grown by inoculating tubes with 5 mL of YEM with a loop from the slants kept in the refrigerator. These were incubated in an orbital shaker at 150 rpm for 7 days. Then an aliquot of the culture was inoculated and grown in YEM. Five ml cultures were transferred to 50 mL of liquid YEM medium and incubated at 30 °C for 1 week. Bacteria were grown to mid log phase at OD600 of 0.6–1.
Seeds of Italian cultivar Baldo were surface sterilized by immersing them for 10 min in 95% ethanol, rinsed twice with sterilized distilled water and then immersed 10 min in 10% calcium hypochlorite (CaOCl) and finally rinsed six times with sterile distilled water. Then, they were placed in sterile petri dishes with moistened filter papers and were incubated at room temperature in the darkness. Seedlings with 1 to 2 cm long roots were inoculated with a bacterial suspension obtained by resuspending pelleted cells of a Mid log phase bacterial cultures in sterile PBS to a concentration of 1 × 108 cells/mL. Inoculation was performed by soaking germinated seeds in the inoculant suspension or in sterile PBS (negative control) for 20 min. 2-weeks old seedlings were transferred to plastic pots containing local unsterilized soil. Complete randomized design (CRD) with three replicates per each treatment was followed. Pots were watered with tap water once in every two days and maintained at a constant water level above the soil surface.
Several parameters were measured within plants of the pot assay. The determinations made on the rice plants were shoot and root length (cm) and dry weight (g), shoot and root weight (g), chlorophyll content of leaves at two stages of growth; days to fifth leaf and plant height (cm) at fifth leaf stage; days to flowering, plant height (cm), culm number, leaf number and chlorophyll content (µg/mL) were measured in infected Baldo rice grown in pots.
The Chlorophyll content was measured (i) 2 weeks after inoculation, (ii) at the V5 vegetative stage corresponding to the upper part of the last leaf developed that acquired at least 80% of its size, which was the flag leave at the V5, and (iii) at flowering stage. An 0.2 g of fresh plant leaf was frozen and kept at − 20 °C for 5 days. Chlorophyll was measured as described by Arnon [27]. Briefly, samples were homogenized in 5 mL of 80% acetone at 4 °C until complete leaf decolouration, then they were centrifuged at 2500 rpm for 10 min then absorption of the extracts was measured using a spectrophotometer at 663 nm (A663), 647 nm (A647) and 470 nm (A470) in a Sp-2000UV spectrophotometer. Total chlorophyll content and carotenoid content were calculated using the formula used by Sumanta, et al. [28].
Re-Isolation of Bradyrhizobium from Inoculated Plants
Samples of 0.2 g of leaf, shoot and root were collected from inoculated and non-inoculated plants 15 days after inoculation. Each sample was thoroughly washed with tap water, rinsed with sterile distilled water and dried before proceeding to surface sterilize them by immersion in 95% ethanol for 2 min followed by 6 washes with sterile distilled water followed by an immersion in 70% calcium hypochlorite for 10 min. After rinsing the samples, 100 µL of the final wash was plated on Tryptone-Yeast extract (TY, Casein enzymic hydrolysate 6.0 g/L, Yeast extract powder 3.0 g/L, Agar 12.0 g/L, pH 7.2) agar plates. TY plates with no growth confirmed sterility of the samples that were used to isolate endophytic bacteria. Then, samples were crushed in sterile mortars supplemented with 20 μL of sterile water in the laminar hood under sterile conditions. Then 5 µL was transferred to an Eppendorf tube containing 495 µL of sterile water and, after vortexing, 0.1 mL aliquots were spread on YEM agar and incubated overnight before monitoring. We analysed the bacterial content on three replicates of each treatment.
Genetic Characterization of Re-Isolated Strains
Bacterial colonies re-isolated from inoculated plants were cultured in nutrient broth (NB; Beef Extract 1.0 g/L, Yeast Extract 2.0 g/L, pH 6.8) liquid medium that was agitated in an orbital shaker at 180 rpm at 30 °C for 4 days. One ml culture of each organism was transferred into 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes and DNA was extracted by using a Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega) following the instructions of the supplier. The nifH gene was amplified by using universal primers: NifH F2, 5′-TGYGAYCCIAAIGCIGA-3′ and NifH R6, 5′-TCIGGIGARATGATGGC-3′ [29].
Field Test
B. diazoefficiens SEMIA 5080 (83), B. japonicum E109 (84), B. elkanii SEMIA 587 (85) were used to inoculate rice seeds that were sown in the field to evaluate bacterial growth promotion effect on two rice varieties, Gurí INTA ssp. Indica (G) and Yeruá La Plata ssp. Japonica (Y) (Argentina).
A liquid YEM culture of 5 mL of each Bradyrhizobium strain was prepared at room temperature for inoculation. After 24 h of culture, it was transferred to 100 mL of YEM liquid medium and incubated at 30 °C for 1 week. A bacterial suspension of each Bradyrhizobium strain was prepared as described above. At the moment of inoculation, they were supplemented with 5% sucrose as adhesive and then seeds were soaked in a plastic container containing 50 mL of a bacterial suspension of 1 × 109 cfu/mL. Seeds were sown in lots of 5 × 2 m (5 rows, 20 cm between each) and plant density was of 400 seeds per square meter. The seeds of each inoculated plot were mixed with 15 mL of culture. Rice plots were managed under irrigation without flooding and were not amended with chemical fertilizers. Chyalofop was applied for preventative barnyard grass control.
The parameters measured were determined at two stages of growth development, 2 months after sowing and at harvest. At the first sampling date, three plants were collected at random from each plot and the following parameters were determined: shoot height (cm) and weight (g), root length (cm) and weight (g), total plant length (cm) and total plant weight (g). At harvest, 3 linear meters per plot were harvested and yield (g/m2) and thousand grains weight (PMG, g) were calculated and 1 linear meter of each plot was used to calculate aerial dry matter (g/m2).
Data Collection and Analysis
In pot experiments, a two-way variance (ANOVA), means (ANOM), and simple regression analysis was conducted using Minitab® (version 15.1.0.0.) statistical software; statistically significant differences were established at the P < 0.05 level. Significant difference between means of each treatment was compared using the Duncan Multiple Range Test (DMRT) using SAS software (9.1 version, USA).
In the case of field trials, the design was a randomized block design with 3 replicates per treatment. All the data were analysed by the analysis of variance ANOVA (one-way analysis of variance) at the 0.05 level (P < 0.05). The level of significance was calculated by using Fisher's LSD test (Least significant difference) (P < 0.05) for multiple comparisons. The statistical program InfoStat (version 2011) was used.
Results and Discussion
Bradyrhizobium Effect on Rice Growth
Growth of rice plants was assessed by measuring root, shoot and whole plant length and dry weight along plant development at the seedling stage, 2 weeks after inoculation with Bradyrhizobia. The other two developmental stages corresponded with the moment rice plants developed the 5th leaf and the development of the first primary tiller, when the second node's tiller emerges and roots start growing. In Fig. 1, we present plant growth at the first step of plant development. Inoculation promoted plant growth, whether measured by shoot or plant height and dry weight, independently of the Bradyrhizobium isolate inoculated. However, it should be highlighted that two strains, B. diazoefficiens SEMIA 5080 and B. japonicum E109, promoted plant growth the most, in particular in term of dry weight (Fig. 1A). Furthermore, the analysis of plant height and plant dry weight showed that they looked similar suggesting that any of them can be a reliable index of rice growth. Therefore, we used this information to make non-destructive measurements at the 5th leaf stage.
Plant development is important and is an indirect index of plant growth so we determined the number of days it took plants of each treatment to reach the 5th leaf stage as well as the flowering stage (Fig. 2). It can be seen that inoculation with B. japonicum and B. diazoefficiens strains substantially reduced the number of days required to get to the fifth leaf stage, while it was not the same when B. elkanii was the inoculated bacteria (Fig. 2A). Observation of inoculation effects on days to flowering showed that the B. japonicum E109 was the strain that anticipated flowering the most, seventeen days earlier that the non-inoculated control. However, also B. japonicum SEMIA 5079 and B. elkanii SEMIA 587 significantly anticipated flowering (Fig. 2B and Table 1). This phenomenon of plant growth anticipation might be related with either a particular molecule synthesized and released within the plant rhizosphere either by one or the other strains used or to the different ability of these two species of rhizobia to colonize plant tissue and live as an endophyte and promote growth.
At the flowering stage, plant growth was assessed also by measuring plant height showing that B. diazoefficiens SEMIA 5080, B. japonicum E109 and B. japonicum SEMIA 5079 were the ones that promoted growth the most (Table 1).
To assess the influence of rice inoculation on nitrogen nutrition and photosynthesis, we analysed Chlorophyll a (Ch a), Chlorophyll b (Ch b) and Carotenoids (Table 2). We found some significant differences that have been further analysed by Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Hierarchal Cluster Analysis (HCA).
Attempts to recover Bradyrhizobium strains from inoculated rice seedlings resulted in the isolation of slow-growing (at least 6–7 days) rhizobia. They did not form spores and developed circular, opaque, rarely translucent, white and convex colonies, phenotypically similar to those developed by Bradyrhizobium strains used for the inoculation. The result of this re-isolation and the observed average number of Colony Forming Units (CFU/g) are 26 ± 1, 378 ± 12 and 2 ± 1 for leaves, shoots and roots, respectively. These results suggest that Bradyrhizobium locates predominantly in shoots, confirming previous reports of its endophytism in rice [23, 24, 30]. When genomic DNA from re-isolated putative Bradyrhizobium was amplified with nifH gene primers, generated amplicons confirmed the presence of the gene within the bacterial genome, indicating that the bacteria re-isolated from the shoot of rice plants were nitrogen-fixing Bradyrhizobium.
Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Hierarchal Cluster Analysis (HCA)
PCA and HCA were performed to further confirm and describe how bacteria are clustered based on their effect on growth at the different developmental stages examined. The PC analysis showed that four PCs accounted for more than 96% of the whole variation. Table 3 reports the characters that contributed positively or negatively to each PC as well as their percentages of variation. Shoot, root and total length, root weight, Ch b and carotenoid content at the 2-weeks stage, days to the fifth leaf, days to flowering, leaf number, carotenoid content at flowering stage were included in PC1 explaining 45.3% of the total variation.
In HCA, the five commercial Bradyrhizobium strains were grouped into four main clusters formed at the rescaled distance of 5. The clustering was performed according to all vegetative and physiochemical characters measured at the 2-weeks, fifth leaf and flowering developmental stages of Baldo rice plants, which were separately inoculated with five Bradyrhizobium strains (Fig. 3). The dendrogram obtained using the Wards Linkage method is shown in Fig. 3. Baldo rice plants inoculated with strains B. diazoefficiens SEMIA 5080 (BRD83), B. japonicum SEMIA 5079 (BRD86), B. elkanii SEMIA 587 (BRD85) and B. elkanii SEMIA 5019 (BRD87) responded similarly, but plants inoculated with B. japonicum E109 (BRD84) was clustered alone, like uninoculated control plants showing that they each had a unique and different performance.
Correlation Analysis
We correlated several vegetative and physicochemical traits and the results are presented in Table 3. Statistically positive and negative correlations at P < 0.1 and r > 0.3 were identified. The length period it took the plant to reach the 5th leaf stage was positively correlated with root weight at 2 weeks stage, days to flowering, Ch a content and carotenoid content at flowering stage. But it was negatively correlated with shoot length, root length, total length, Ch b and carotenoid content at 2 weeks stage, plant height at fifth leaf stage, leaf number and plant height at flowering stage. Furthermore, days to flowering positively correlated with root weight, chlorophyll content at 2 weeks stage, days to fifth leaf, Ch a, total chlorophyll and carotenoid content at flowering stage. We tested the effect Bradyrhizobium strains inoculation had on the early flowering Italian variety Baldo in in vitro experiments. Filella et al. [31] and Moran et al. [32] stated that chlorophyll content might be an indirect measurement useful to predict the plant nutrient status since available N is rapidly incorporated to chlorophyll. Furthermore, the ratio of Ch a to Ch b in land plants is widely used as an indicator of response to shade and as an early indicator of senescence [33]; because of these reasons we measured chlorophyll content [31]. Carotenoid pigments can be located in chromoplasts or in chloroplasts and together with chlorophylls are involved in the photosystem and have an impact on its activity [34]. The ratio between chlorophyll and carotenoids is a sensitive indicator for the distinction of natural full-term senescence and senescence due to environmental stress [35, 36]. In this study it is shown that Bradyrhizobium inoculated plants had a higher chlorophyll content compared to uninoculated plants, suggesting that inoculation affected plant nitrogen content as well as crop productivity. Future studies should analyse if the life cycle of the plant is modified by the higher availability of N.
Bacteria and plants can establish a wide array of different interactions. Plant-associated bacteria colonize tissues internally that is the apoplast of tissues becoming in this way endophytic bacteria (endophytes), or they basically might live within the phyllosphere (epiphytes) and also within the rhizosphere (rhizobacteria), being each of these a completely different environment [37]. Endophytes have been isolated from leaves, fruits, flowers, stems, seeds and roots of various plant species [38]. Host plants provide a shelter to endophytes that are protected from environmental stresses and microbial competitions. Concomitantly these endophytic bacteria beneficially affect the plant since among many other things it can induce mechanisms of resistance to plant pathogens [39, 40], nitrogen fixation [41, 42] and plant growth promotion [43].
Field Trials
Bradyrhizobium promoted growth of rice in field trials, although with differences between the two rice varieties tested, Guri and Yerua’, and the strains used for the inoculation. We observed that B. elkanii had a more pronounced growth-promoting effect on both the varieties than the other strains, although it was not the case in preliminary laboratory experiments in which the Italian rice variety Baldo was used. In addition, B. elkanii incidentally can synthesize a toxin, rhizobitoxine that in soybeans provokes chlorosis in plants [44] and could have affected the early stages of rice development. Although at this moment we do not know the reason for such differences, both results, those obtained in preliminary experiments and those of field trials, suggest that Bradyrhizobium promote the growth of rice. In ¨in vitro¨ assays performed in laboratory conditions, inoculated rice produced more dry matter in a shorter period of time compared to uninoculated rice early during plant growth (Fig. 1). Such promotion of growth was confirmed by the fact that inoculation reduced the length of plant life cycle, that is to say, plants reach the fifth leaf and flowering stage in a shorter period (Fig. 2), which confirms the faster growth of plants.
In field conditions we could not confirm statistically this behaviour due to high variability (Fig. 4), although the average values suggest some differences in term of length (Fig. 4A) and dry weight (Fig. 4B) of roots and aerial parts of rice plants. Though differences between treatments remained they were not significant as plants develop and complete their life cycle. These differences decreased as the crop progressed, until they became minimal and not significant at harvesting, as shown in Fig. 5 for dry weight. The results were not so clearly related with the Bradyrhizobium species inoculated unlike what was observed at earlier stages of plant development, where differences between the Bradyrhizobium species inoculated were clear and consistent. Interestingly, inoculated plants yielded consistently more than uninoculated ones, whether they were inoculated with B. japonicum, B. diazoefficiens or B. elkanii. Cultivar Yeruá yielded significantly more when it was inoculated with B. diazoefficiens SEMIA5080, B. japonicum E109 and B. elkanii SEMIA 587 than uninoculated rice, the former ones yielded between 23 and 27% more than the latter one (Fig. 5). On the contrary, plants of cultivar Guri had a significant increase of yield only when inoculated with B. elkanii SEMIA 587, compared to the other inoculated plants as well as the uninoculated controls (Fig. 5). Both results of cultivar Yeruá and Guri suggest that the effect of inoculation is related with the bacterial species and/or strains but also with cultivars genetic background, which confirms other findings regarding the effect of plant genotype in plant–microbe interactions [45]. In a way cultivar Gurí behaved similarly at the yield level. It is important to highlight the low yields observed in the field trials, which might be related to two reasons: one is that the plot was not fertilized and the other one that the experiment was seeded late in the season, shortening in this way plants life cycle, growth and consequently yield. The thousand seed weight was different in the two cultivars because of the characteristic of each cultivar, but was the same within the same cultivar whether plants were inoculated or not suggesting that yield differences can be explained by more tillers carrying more panicles or more seeds (Fig. 5). In this regard, more experiments including several cultivars should be performed to confirm this hypothesis. B. elkanii SEMIA 587 was the one that affected plant the most since it promoted plant growth of both varieties and in the field. It would be interesting to evaluate the effect of inoculation under a management system that include fertilization and early seedling, conditions where average yields should range between 7000 and 10,000 kg/ha under a fertilized, flooding and earlier sowing management.
Conclusions
Inoculation with B. japonicum E109 promoted the growth of the Italian rice variety Baldo very early within the plant life cycle and this was also related with a reduction in plant life cycle. Days to fifth leaf stage and flowering were reduced in plants inoculated with Bradyrhizobium and mostly with B. japonicum E109. In addition, Bradyrhizobium representatives inoculated at seeding showed the ability to colonize rice shoots.
Not all Bradyrhizobium species had the same effect on rice growth since strains provoked different increments in growth and yield. B. elkanii SEMIA 587 gave the highest yield increment in both rice varieties in the field.
Future work should be aimed at evaluating several rice cultivars and their response to inoculation as well as the role of the Bradyrhizobium isolates in improving growth of rice. Most probably, a selection of Bradyrhizobium adapted to rice-growing conditions should be performed in order to develop rice inoculants in the future.
As an alternative to the fertilization of rice, exploration and usage of endophytes that, as shown here, can be incorporated at seeding to increase nutrient supply for plant growth either by providing more nutrients or by the effect of the microorganism active compounds should be considered. Endophytes reside in plant tissues and establish an ample array of relationships that range from symbiotic to slightly pathogenic can synthetize molecules which are already being used in fields such as modern medicine, agriculture and industry [46, 47]. Therefore, rice production might be increased by using microorganisms that promote growth as well as yield, studying if such effect might be exerted by a consortium of endophytic bacteria. Future studies should be able to identify the organisms that additionally might be incorporated at seeding. Another issue is to identify within such organism which are the active compounds.
Various studies conducted on plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPR) determine that PGPR can be used as biofertilizer to promote sustainable agriculture. Their ability to solubilize inorganic phosphorous, fix nitrogen and excrete plant growth regulators such as IAA is very prominent in plant growth promotion [48]. With the influence of diazotrophic bacteria, plant receives the optimum amount of nutrients which enable the plant to perform better with a higher growth rate [49]. Plant-associated bacteria such as the Bradyrhizobium of this study interact with rice plants and seem to be involved in the biological processes that lead rice to growth promotion and plant productivity. The mechanisms of rice plant colonization and growth promotion, as well as the specificity between rice varieties and Bradyrhizobium strains, still remain to be investigated and clarified.
References
Gerland P, Raftery AE, Ševčíková H, Li N, Gu D, Spoorenberg T, Alkema L, Fosdick BK, Chunn J, Lalic N (2014) World population stabilization unlikely this century. Science 346:234–237. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1257469
Liu X, Wang H, Zhou J, Hu F, Zhu D, Chen Z (2016) Effect of N fertilization pattern on rice yield, N use efficiency and fertilizer–N fate in the Yangtze river basin China. PLoS ONE 11:e0166002. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166002
Jacoby R, Peukert M, Succurro A, Koprivova A, Kopriva S (2017) The role of soil microorganisms in plant mineral nutrition-current knowledge and future directions. Front Plant Sci 8:1617. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01617
Paungfoo-Lonhienne C, Visser J, Lonhienne TGA, Schmidt S (2012) Past, present and future of organic nutrients. Plant Soil 359:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1357
Van der Heijden MGA, Bardgett RD, Van Straalen NM (2008) The unseen majority: soil microbes as drivers of plant diversity and productivity in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol Lett 11:296–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01139.x
Verbon EH, Liberman LM (2016) Beneficial microbes affect endogenous mechanisms controlling root development. Trends Plant Sci 21:218–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2016.01.013
Mendes R, Garbeva P, Raaijmakers JM (2013) The rhizosphere microbiome: significance of plant beneficial, plant pathogenic, and human pathogenic microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol Rev 37:634–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6976.12028
McNear DH Jr (2013) The rhizosphere-roots, soil and everything in between. Nat Educ Knowl 4:1
Bhattacharyya PN, Jha DK (2012) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): emergence in agriculture. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 28:1327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-011-0979-9
Pathania N, Gosal SK, Saroa GS, Vikal Y (2014) Molecular characterization of diazotrophic bacteria isolated from rhizosphere of wheat cropping system from central plain region of Punjab. Afr J Microbiol Res 8:862–871. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR2013.5948
Vessey JK (2003) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers. Plant Soil 255:571. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026037216893
Rodriguez-Navarro DN, Oliver IM, Contreras MA, Ruiz-Sainz JE (2010) Soybean interactions with soil microbes, agronomical and molecular aspects. Agron Sustain Dev 31:173–190. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro/2010023
Jordan D (1982) NOTES: transfer of Rhizobium japonicum Buchanan 1980 to Bradyrhizobium gen. nov., a genus of slow growing, root nodule bacteria from leguminous plants. Int J Syst Bacteriol 32:136–139
Kuykendall LD, Saxena B, Devine TE, Udell SE (1992) Genetic diversity in Bradyrhizobium japonicum and a proposal for Bradyrhizobium elkanii sp. nov. Can J Microbiol 38:501–505
Marçon Delamuta JR, Ribeiro RA, Ormeño-Orrillo E, Soares Melo I, Martínez-Romero E, Hungria M (2013) Polyphasic evidence supporting the reclassification of Bradyrhizobium japonicum group Ia strains as Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 63:3342–3351. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.049130-0
Siqueira et al. (2014). Comparative genomics of Bradyrhizobium japonicum CPAC 15 and Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens CPAC 7: elite model strains for understanding symbiotic performance with soybean. BMC Genomics 15:420. https://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/15/420.
Halverson LJ, Stacey G (1986) Signal exchange in plant-microbe interactions. Microbiol Rev 50:193–225
Sadowsky MJ, Tully RE, Cregan PB, Keyser HH (1987) Genetic diversity in Bradyrhizobium japonicum Serogroup 123 and its relation to genotype-specific nodulation of soybean. Appl Environ Microbiol 53:2624–2630
Itakura M, Saeki K, Omori H, Yokoyama T, Kaneko T, Tabata S, Ohwada T, Tajima S, Uchiumi T, Honnma K, Fujita K, Iwata H, Saeki Y, Hara Y, Ikeda S, Eda S, Mitsui H, Minamisawa K (2009) Genomic comparison of Bradyrhizobium japonicum strains with different symbiotic nitrogen-fixing capabilities and other Bradyrhizobiaceae members. ISME J 3:326–339. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2008.88
Antoun H, Beauchamp CJ, Goussard N, Chabot R, Lalande R (1998) Potential of Rhizobium and Bradyrhizobium species as plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on non-legumes: effect on radishes (Raphanus sativus L.). In: Hardarson G, Broughton WJ (eds) Molecular microbial ecology of the soil. Developments in plant and soil sciences. vol 83, Springer, Dordrecht
Chebotar VK, Asis CA Jr, Akao S (2001) Production of growth-promoting substances and high colonization ability of rhizobacteria enhance the nitrogen fixation of soybean when coinoculated with Bradyrhizobium japonicum. Biol Fertil Soils 34:427–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-001-0426-4
Tan Z, Hurek T, Vinuesa P, Müller P, Ladha JK, Reinhold-Hurek B (2001) Specific detection of Bradyrhizobium and Rhizobium strains colonizing rice (Oryza sativa) roots by 16S–23S ribosomal DNA intergenic spacer-targeted PCR. Appl Environ Microb 67:3655–3664. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.67.8.3655-3664.2001
Chaintreuil C, Giraud E, Prin Y, Lorquin J, Bâ A, Gillis M, de Lajudie P, Dreyfus B (2000) Photosynthetic bradyrhizobia are natural endophytes of the African wild rice Oryza breviligulata. Appl Environ Microbiol 66(12):5437–5447
Mano H, Morisaki H (2008) Endophytic bacteria in the rice plant. Microbes Environ 23:109–117. https://doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.109
Sreevidya VS, Hernandez-Oane RJ, So RB, Sullia SB, Stacey G, Ladha JK, Reddy PM (2005) Expression of the legume symbiotic lectin genes psl and gs52 promotes rhizobial colonization of roots in rice. Plant Sci 169:726–736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2005.05.024
Vincent JM (1970) A manual for the practical study of the root-nodule bacteria. Blackwell, Oxford
Arnon DI (1949) Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol 24:1–15
Sumanta N, Haque CI, Jaishee N, Roy S (2014) Spectrophotometric analysis of chlorophylls and carotenoids from commonly grown fern species by using various extracting solvents. Res J Chem Sci 4:63–69
Gaby JC, Buckley DH (2012) A comprehensive evaluation of PCR primers to amplify the nifH gene of nitrogenase. PLoS ONE 7:e42149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042149
Piromyou P, Greetatorn T, Teamtisong K, Tittabutr P, Boonkerd N, Teaumroong N (2017) Potential of rice stubble as a reservoir of Bradyrhizobial inoculum in rice-legume crop rotation. Appl Environ Microbiol 83:e01488-e1517. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01488-17
Filella I, Serrano L, Serra J, Penuelas J (1995) Evaluating wheat nitrogen status with canopy reflectance indices and discriminant analysis. Crop Sci 35:1400–1405
Moran JA, Mitchell AK, Goodmanson G (2000) Differentiation among effects of nitrogen fertilization treatments on conifer seedlings by foliar reflectance: a comparison of methods. Tree Physiol 20:1113–1120
Brown SB, Houghton JD, Hendry GAF (1991) Chlorophyll breakdown. In: Scheer H (ed) Chlorophylls. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 465–489
Costache MA, Campeanu G, Neata G (2012) Studies concerning the extraction of chlorophyll and total carotenoids from vegetables. Rom Biotechnol Lett 17:7702–7708
Buckland SM, Price AH, Hendry GAF (1991) The role of ascorbate in drought-treated Cochlearia atlantica Pobed. and Armeria maritima (Mill.) Willd. New Phytol 119:155–160
Vicaş SI, Laslo V, Pantea S, Bandici GE (2010) Chlorophyll and carotenoids pigments from mistletoe (Viscum album) leaves using different solvents. Analele Universităţii din Oradea Fascicula Biologie 2:213–218.
Hung PQ, Annapurna K (2004) Isolation and characterization of endophytic bacteria in soybean (Glycine sp.). Omonrice 12:92–101
Kobayashi D, Palumbo JD (2000) Bacterial endophytes and their effects on plants and uses in agriculture. In: Bacon CW, White JF (eds) Microbial endophytes. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 199–233
Liu L, Kloepper JW, Tuzun S (1995) Induction of systemic resistance in cucumber against Fusarium wilt by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Phytopathology 85:695–698
Sturz A, Matheson B (1996) Populations of endophytic bacteria which influence host-resistance to Erwinia-induced bacterial soft rot in potato tubers. Plant Soil 184:265–271
Kirchhof G, Reis VM, Baldani JI, Eckert B, Döbereiner J, Hartmann A (1997) Occurrence, physiological and molecular analysis of endophytic diazotrophic bacteria in gramineous energy plants. In: Ladha JK et al (eds) Opportunities for biological nitrogen fixation in rice and other non-legumes. Developments in plant and soil sciences. vol 75, Springer, Dordrecht, pp 45–55
Reinhold-Hurek B, Hurek T (1998) Life in grasses: diazotrophic endophytes. Trends Microbiol 6:139–144
Sturz AV, Christie BR, Matheson BG, Nowak J (1997) Biodiversity of endophytic bacteria which colonize red clover nodules, roots, stems and foliage and their influence on host growth. Biol Fertil Soil 25:13–19
Devine TE, Kuykendall LD, O’Neill JJ (1988) DNA homology group and the identity of Bradyrhizobial strains producing rhizobitoxine-induced foliar chlorosis on soybean. Crop Sci 28:938–939
Sessitsch A, Mitter B (2015) 21st century agriculture: integration of plant microbiomes for improved crop production and food security. Microb Biotechnol 8:32–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12180
Mbai FN, Magiri EN, Matiru VN, Ng’ang’a J, Nyambati VCS (2013) Isolation and characterisation of bacterial root endophytes with potential toenhance plant growth from Kenyan Basmati rice. Am Int J Contemp Res 3:25–40
Strobel G, Daisy B, Castillo U, Harper J (2004) Natural products from endophytic microorganisms. J Nat Prod 67:257–268
Martinez-Viveros O, Jorquera MA, Crowley DE, Gajardo G, Mora ML (2010) Mechanisms and practical considerations involved in plant growth promotion by rhizobacteria. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 10:293–319
Ai’shah ON, Amir HG, Keng CL, Othman AR (2010) Influence of various combinations of diazotrophs and chemical N fertilizer on plant growth and N2 fixation capacity of oil palm seedlings (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.). Thai J Agric Sci 42:139–149
Acknowledgements
D.P. was supported by a grant from National Science Foundation, Colombo, Sri Lanka. J.M.R. was supported by a grant from the International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB), Buenos Aires, Argentina. P.A.B. is a scientist supported by the Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. This research was also possible thanks to funds made available by ICGEB and the support from the Faculty of Agriculture, University of Ruhuna, Mapalana, Kamburupitiya, Sri Lanka, and Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales, Universidad Nacional de La Plata (FCAyF).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
DP performed the experiments in the laboratory; JMR and RB followed the field trials; SG, PAB and GD planned the experiments, elaborated the results and wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Padukkage, D., Geekiyanage, S., Reparaz, J.M. et al. Bradyrhizobium japonicum, B. elkanii and B. diazoefficiens Interact with Rice (Oryza sativa), Promote Growth and Increase Yield. Curr Microbiol 78, 417–428 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-020-02249-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-020-02249-z