Abstract
The aim of this work was to determine reliable anatomical landmarks for locating and preserving the abducens nerves (6th cranial nerves) during trans-facial or trans-nasal endoscopic approaches of skull base tumors involving the clivus and the petrous apex. In order to describe this specific anatomy, we carefully dissected 10 cadaveric heads under optic magnification. Several measurements were taken between the two petro-sphénoidal foramina, from the bottom of the sella and the dorsum sellae. The close relationship between the nerves and the internal carotid artery were taken into account. We defined a trapezoid area that allowed drilling the clivus safely, preserving the 6th cranial nerve while being attentive to the internal carotid artery. The caudal part of this trapezium is, on average, 20 mm long at mi-distance between the two petro-sphenoidal foramina. The cranial part is at the sella level, a line between both paraclival internal carotid arteries. Oblique lateral edges between the cranial and caudal parts completed the trapezium.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Optimal tumor resection is an essential goal of skull base tumor surgery. In transfacial or transnasal endoscopic approaches, preservation of the vessels and nerves may be challenging. Anatomical knowledge of landmarks and careful assessment of preoperative planning are essential, although local anatomy may be modified by the tumors.
Unilateral or bilateral abducens nerve (6th nerve) palsy is a frequent presentation of skull base tumors involving the clivus and the petrous apex. Postoperative functional nerve recovery is often good because the palsy is often due to mass effect. However, intraoperative 6th nerve injury is frequent in extended lateral approaches especially in the middle third of the clivus.
The main objective of this study was to determine reliable landmarks for locating and preserving the 6th cranial nerves in the ventral surgical approach of the skull base tumors mainly those with lateral extension, because the nerve position does not vary in the petro-sphenoidal foramen (Dorello).
Materials and methods
Heads from 10 human cadavers have been dissected. Two of them have been injected with colored neoprene latex.
After neck section, colored neoprene latex was injected, red for carotid and vertebral arteries and blue for the jugular veins. Then, all the specimens colored or not, were fixed with a 10% formalin solution for at least 4 weeks.
After midfacial deglowing, large bilateral maxillectomy, complete ethmoidectomy and hard palate removal were performed, providing a large exposure of the clival region. Clivus, sella turcica and ethmoid were first drilled away to expose dura mater, then petrous bone on both sides. This provided a large exposure of the clival, sellar and cavernous dura mater. Carotid arteries were exposed in their intrapetrous and cavernous portions (Fig. 1).
The retroclival dura mater was then carefully divided from the midline towards lateral in order to locate the abducens nerve pathway through the petro-sphenoidal foramen in which the nerve is surrounded by meningeal layers (Fig. 2).
Microdissections were performed under optic magnification (Zeiss OPMI Pentero 900; 250 and 300 mm focal distances). Location and direction of the 6th nerves were observed in their cisternal portion, then in their petro-sphenoidal foramen.
Several measurements were taken:
-
Distance between the midline and the petro-sphenoidal foramen.
-
Distance between the right and left petro-sphenoidal foramina.
-
The height between the sella turcica (inferior line of the dorsum sellae) and the line joining both petro-sphenoidal foramina (Figs. 3, 4).
The sphenoid rostrum is considered in the literature as a reliable landmark of the midline [26]. However our reference for the midline was the most inferior point of the dorsum sellae for repeatable length measurement.
Results
Among the 20 abducens nerves dissected in 10 specimens, all but one originated from a unique trunk of the brain stem. One nerve on the right side, originated as two separate branches until it penetrated the dura mater and entered in the petro-sphenoidal foramen.
In the cisternal portion, directions of the 6th nerves were cranial, ventral then lateral. This latter direction became more pronounced just before their penetration in the petro-sphenoidal foramen.
The distance between the petro-sphenoïdal foramen and the midline was 10.5 mm ± 1 mm and the distance between the left and right petro-sphenoidal foramen was 21 mm ± 1.5 mm.
In all the specimens, the 6th nerves emerged ventrally at the medial part of the carotid artery genu, immediately after the foramen lacerum.
The distance separating the sella turcica (dorsum sellae) and a line between both 6th nerves on the ventral part of the clivus, just before the petro-sphenoidal foramen, was 16.5 mm ± 1.5 mm.
At the exit of the petro-sphenoidal foramen, the 6th nerves run into a dural sleeve to the cavernous sinus where they cross the intracavernous carotid artery at its dorsal part.
Discussion
In the middle of the twentieth century, transsphenoidal approach was described as the preferred route to reach the sella, especially for pituitary adenoma. This transsphenoidal approach has evolved over the last decades with the development of the endoscopy which offers a wider view and which allows an improved handling of instruments, enabling much more invasive surgery close to the cavernous sinus [6, 19]. Other surgical approaches like trans-clival and trans-pterygoid, used for tumor extending laterally to the paraclival carotid artery, are associated with a higher incidence of carotid injury [2, 7, 11].
In the literature, only a few reports have analysed the landmarks of the 6th cranial nerves to guide a trans-sphenoidal approach [3, 28]. Nevertheless, we believe that having this point in mind would help achieve a gross total resection of a midline tumor in order to preserve the 6th cranial nerve’s function. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) poses some challenges in identifying the 6th cranial nerve not only in the cavernous sinus but also when it penetrates the dura mater at the ventral part of the clivus [10, 18, 21]. The tumor mass effect makes MRI identification of the 6th cranial nerve much more difficult. Therefore, we proposed this anatomical study in order to define morphological parameters which would help locate the abducens nerve when it comes out of the clival intradural space towards the foramen petro-sphenoidal.
The abducens nerve is tightly fixed to the skull base at the level of the petrous apex [8, 24]. This nerve is like a rope stretched between two fixed points, its apparent origin on the brain stem at the level of the bulbo-pontic sulcus and its arrival in the petro-sphenoidal foramen. This situation probably explains the paralysis of the 6th nerve after a head injury or a subarachnoid haemorrhage depending on the partitioning of the basal cisterns. Generally, the nerve itself is not directly damaged leading to “the famous paralysis without localizing value”. Like previous authors, we observed variabilities in the intracisternal course of the 6th nerve and its relationship with the antero-inferior cerebellar artery. The nerve is sometimes partially or completely split [17, 20].
For these reasons, we focused on the emergence of the 6th nerve at the petro-sphenoidal foramen which is made of a bony part and the petro-sphenoidal ligament [25]. Using the paraclival carotid as the only landmark to pinpoint the 6th cranial nerve is not reliable because of anatomical variations of the internal carotid artery in this segment [4, 9].
Furthermore, the 6th cranial nerve has the most medial entry point of all the nerves passing through the cavernous sinus [12]. Additionally location of the 6th nerve makes it easier to avoid the other nerves, that is the ocular motor nerve (III), the trochlear nerve (IV) and the ophthalmic branch of the trigeminal nerve (V).
The distance between the two 6th nerve penetration points in the dura mater, from their cisternal space, was 21 mm ± 1.5 mm, and was consistent with the findings of Lang et al. and Zhang et al. [14, 27].
On the ventral aspect of the clivus, the mean distance between, the dural penetration point of the 6th nerve and the midline was 10.5 mm ± 1 mm. This value is consistent with the distance between both 6th nerves on the dorsal part of the clivus. Al-Mefty et al. [1] found a distance separating both petrous apexes of 21.5 mm (19–25) to plan ventral approaches of the clivus. Campero et al. [5] showed that the 6th nerve, protected in this segment by a sleeve of dura mater, crosses the internal carotid artery in it dorsal part.
On a ventral view of the skull base, the line from the lower part of the sella, i.e. the dorsum sellae, to that between the two 6th nerve dural penetration points is 16.5 mm ± 1.5 mm long.
Based on this data, we have defined a trapezoid area that allows drilling the clivus safely preserving the 6th cranial nerves. The caudal part of this trapezium is 20 mm long centered on the midline, separating the genu from each of the internal carotid artery. The cranial part of the trapezium is at the sella level, a line between both paraclival internal carotid arteries. This is the most variable landmark because of the anatomical variations of the internal carotid arteries in this portion. The same precautions should be taken, as in pituitary surgery, not to exceed the lateral limits of the bottom of the sella. The lateral ends of the cranial and caudal parts of the trapezium join and form the right and left lateral edges of this trapezium. The lateral edges follow the medial part of each of the internal carotid arteries in their paraclival segment.
The 6th cranial nerves are always more lateral compared to the medial aspect of the internal carotid artery at the level of the foramen lacerum. Also it is important on the one hand to keep a safe distance from the dural penetration point of the nerve and on the other hand to locate the internal carotid artery to avoid its injury. Internal carotid artery injury remains a rare but a serious complication that has become more frequent proportional to the endoscopic procedures used to widely expose the clival area [2, 7]. Computer assisted surgery may be helpful, especially in endoscopic surgery, because of the loss of three-dimensional vision [16]. Intraoperative doppler ultrasonography is useful to locate the internal carotid artery during bone drilling. The latter is routinely used in our clinical practice because of its ease of use and its cost effectiveness.
Pre-operative imaging (MRI or Computed Tomography scanners) is not accurate enough to locate the 6th cranial nerves, especially in case of tumor mass effect. Per-operative imaging will probably be efficient in the next few years, the main limitation being its accessibility.
To date, 6th cranial nerve monitoring is mainly effective for mapping the location of the nerves in skull base surgery, especially used for tumors located in the cavernous sinus [13, 15, 22]. However, the predictive value of the post-operative nerve’s function is poor and required improvement in technicity and interpretation [23].
Conclusions
Based on these anatomical data, we have defined a trapezoid area that allows drilling the clivus safely.
In this study, we found an average distance of 16 mm from the lower part of the sella to the line between the two dural penetration points of the 6th nerves.
The average distance between the petro-sphenoïdal foramen and the midline was 10.5 mm and the average distance between the left and right petro-sphenoidal foramen was 21 mm. In the future, technical advances (ultrasonography and neuromonitoring) will allow us to optimize the identification of the vascular and nervous structures of this region, during trans-facial and transnasal endoscopic approaches, in surgery of skull base tumors.
References
Al-Mefty O, Kadri PAS, Hasan DM et al (2008) Anterior clivectomy: surgical technique and clinical applications. J Neurosurg 109:783–793. https://doi.org/10.3171/JNS/2008/109/11/0783
AlQahtani A, Castelnuovo P, Nicolai P et al (2016) Injury of the internal carotid artery during endoscopic skull base surgery: prevention and management protocol. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 49:237–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2015.09.009
Barges-Coll J, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Prevedello DM et al (2010) Avoiding injury to the abducens nerve during expanded endonasal endoscopic surgery: anatomic and clinical case studies. Neurosurgery 67:144–154. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000370892.11284.EA(discussion 154)
Bouthillier A, van Loveren HR, Keller JT (1996) Segments of the internal carotid artery: a new classification. Neurosurgery 38:425–432
Campero A, Campero AA, Martins C et al (2010) Surgical anatomy of the dural walls of the cavernous sinus. J Clin Neurosci 17:746–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2009.10.015
Catapano D, Sloffer CA, Frank G et al (2006) Comparison between the microscope and endoscope in the direct endonasal extended transsphenoidal approach: anatomical study. J Neurosurg 104:419–425. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2006.104.3.419
Chin OY, Ghosh R, Fang CH et al (2016) Internal carotid artery injury in endoscopic endonasal surgery: a systematic review. Laryngoscope 126:582–590. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.25748
Destrieux C, Velut S, Kakou MK et al (1997) A new concept in Dorello’s canal microanatomy: the petroclival venous confluence. J Neurosurg 87:67–72. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1997.87.1.0067
Dolci RLL, Ditzel Filho LFS, Goulart CR et al (2018) Anatomical nuances of the internal carotid artery in relation to the quadrangular space. J Neurosurg 128:174–181. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.10.JNS16381
Ferreira T, Verbist B, van Buchem M et al (2010) Imaging the ocular motor nerves. Eur J Radiol 74:314–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.05.066
Gardner PA, Tormenti MJ, Pant H et al (2013) Carotid artery injury during endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: incidence and outcomes. Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000430821.71267.f2
Joo W, Yoshioka F, Funaki T, Rhoton AL Jr (2012) Microsurgical anatomy of the abducens nerve. Clin Anat 25:1030–1042. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22047
Kaspera W, Adamczyk P, Ślaska-Kaspera A, Ładziński P (2015) Usefulness of intraoperative monitoring of oculomotor and abducens nerves during surgical treatment of the cavernous sinus meningiomas. Adv Med Sci 60:25–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advms.2014.08.009
Lang J (1991) Anatomy of the posterior skull base. Rivista di Neuroradiologia 4:125–134
Li Z-Y, Li M-C, Liang J-T et al (2017) Usefulness of intraoperative electromyographic monitoring of oculomotor and abducens nerves during skull base surgery. Acta Neurochir 159:1925–1937. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3268-z
Miyagi A, Maeda K, Sugawara T (1998) Usefulness of neuroendoscopy and a neuronavigator for removal of clival chordoma. No Shinkei Geka 26:169–175
Nathan H, Ouaknine G, Kosary IZ (1974) The abducens nerve. Anatomical variations in its course. J Neurosurg 41:561–566. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1974.41.5.0561
Ono K, Arai H, Endo T et al (2004) Detailed MR imaging anatomy of the abducent nerve: evagination of CSF into Dorello canal. Am J Neuroradiol 25:623–626
Oostra A, van Furth W, Georgalas C (2012) Extended endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: from the sella to the anterior and posterior cranial fossa. ANZ J Surg 82:122–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.2011.05971.x
Ozer E, Icke C, Arda N (2010) Microanatomical study of the intracranial abducens nerve: clinical interest and surgical perspective. Turk Neurosurg 20:449–456. https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.3303-10.1
Özgür A, Esen K, Kara E, Temel GO (2017) Visualization of the abducens nerve in its petroclival segment using contrast-enhanced FIESTA MRI: the size of the petroclival venous confluence affects detectability. Clin Neuroradiol 27:97–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-015-0415-x
Schlake HP, Goldbrunner R, Siebert M et al (2001) Intra-Operative electromyographic monitoring of extra-ocular motor nerves (Nn. III, VI) in skull base surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 143:251–261
Thirumala PD, Mohanraj SK, Habeych M et al (2013) Value of free-run electromyographic monitoring of extraocular cranial nerves during expanded endonasal surgery (EES) of the skull base. J Neurol Surg Rep 74:43–50. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1346975
Tubbs RS, Radcliff V, Shoja MM et al (2012) Dorello canal revisited: an observation that potentially explains the frequency of abducens nerve injury after head injury. World Neurosurg 77:119–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2011.03.046
Vail HH (1922) Anatomical studies of Dorello’s canal. Laryngoscope 32:569–575. https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-192208000-00001
Zada G, Agarwalla PK, Mukundan S et al (2011) The neurosurgical anatomy of the sphenoid sinus and sellar floor in endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery. J Neurosurg 114:1319–1330. https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.11.JNS10768
Zhang Y, Yu H, Shen B-Y et al (2011) Microsurgical anatomy of the abducens nerve. Surg Radiol Anat 34:3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-011-0850-6
(2016) Comparative analysis of the anterior transpetrosal approach with the endoscopic endonasal approach to the petroclival region. J Neurosurg 125(5). https://thejns.org/view/journals/j-neurosurg/125/5/article-p1171.xml. Zugegriffen: 20, April 2020
Acknowledgements
We would like to express our gratitude to all donors to the anatomy laboratory.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
VJ: project development, data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing and editing. MS: manuscript review of English spellings and grammatical errors. DL: protocol project development, data analysis.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jecko, V., Sesay, M. & Liguoro, D. Anatomical location of the abducens nerves (VI) in the ventral approach of clival tumors. Surg Radiol Anat 42, 1371–1375 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-020-02525-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-020-02525-4