Abstract
Background
Little is known about the injury profile of older persons from low-and-middle-income countries, such as South Africa, where violence is prevalent. This study aimed to identify common mechanisms of injury (MOI), severity, complications, and outcomes in elderly patients admitted to a referral trauma centre in Cape Town.
Methods
A retrospective review was performed of all patients ≥60 years presenting at Tygerberg hospital trauma centre over an eight-month period. Descriptive statistics were computed for all variables of interest, and the relationship between the MOI, injury severity score (ISS), complications, and outcomes were assessed.
Results
Of the total 7,635 trauma cases admitted, patients ≥60 years accounted for 4% (n = 275). The most frequent MOI was low falls (58%). Of these 11% of injuries were intentionally inflicted. Among them 35% of the patients experienced complications. The ISS was positively associated with the number of complications (p < 0.01). The mortality rate was 6.5%. An ISS of ≥10 was associated with increased mortality (p < 0.01). The number of complications was positively associated with mortality (p < 0.01).
Conclusions
In contrast to high-income countries (HICs), the cohort of elderly patients admitted to the trauma centre made up a relatively small portion of the total admissions. Compared to HICs, intentionally inflicted injuries and preventable MOI were common in our sample, underscoring the importance of addressing causative factors. Notably, the ISS was strongly associated with the number of complications and an ISS ≥10 was associated with mortality, highlighting the utility of the ISS in identifying elderly trauma patients most at risk of negative outcomes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
In South Africa (SA), high rates of trauma predominantly affect the youth, yet the geriatric population is not exempt and may be considered “easy victims” by potential perpetrators [1,2,3]. In addition to inherent challenges of age, such as increased comorbidities and lack of physiological reserve, elderly trauma patients may be further compromised by resource constraints, especially in surge situations where they may not qualify for critical care beds [4]. These factors result in higher rates of preventable complications in an already vulnerable population and may lead to prolonged hospital stay [5,6,7].
Studies on geriatric cohort from the global north investigated the most frequently encountered mechanisms of injury (MOI), complications, outcomes, and associations with mortality [4, 8,9,10,11,12,13]. According to the majority of studies, including two conducted in under-resourced countries, “low-energy fall” was the most common MOI in the elderly [14,15,16]. Notably, Gomberg et al. found that falls in the elderly occurred three times more frequently than motor vehicle collisions (MVCs), the second most frequently reported MOI [17,18,19,20]. The most common complications following trauma in the elderly population are related to infections, which are largely preventable [21]. Compromised compensatory abilities and impaired recovery from severe injuries result in complications and an increased mortality risk [4, 11, 12].
The injury severity score (ISS), originally introduced by Baker et. al., has been widely used to assess trauma severity in trauma populations [22, 23]. In terms of mortality in elderly trauma patients, a high ISS was confirmed as a significant predictor across a number of studies [8, 22,23,24]. Recent studies have also demonstrated the association of increased age with a higher mortality rate [6, 8, 25]. Elderly trauma patients who survive their injuries may indeed return home and recover to full capacity [8].
Few studies have been conducted on geriatric trauma in low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs). Regional referral hospitals in the South African healthcare system care for large patient populations. Cape Town and the Western Cape province are served by only two public tertiary referral (Level-1 equivalent) trauma centres, providing care to an urban and rural population estimated at over 7-million people [26]. Studies conducted in HICs may not be directly applicable to LMICs such as SA where, although skill and experience are not lacking, there is limited physical resources, large trauma loads, and an unfavorable doctor-patient ratio.
The few studies that have been conducted in under-resourced settings were conducted in countries with lower levels of crime and violence than those evident in Cape Town [11]. Data relevant to an under-resourced, overpopulated, and understaffed South African environment is needed to aid in the provision of equitable care for the injured elderly.
The primary aim of this study was to describe the injury profile (i.e., most common MOI, injury severity (ISS), complications) and outcomes of elderly trauma patients admitted to a South African trauma center. The secondary aim was to assess the relationship between these variables.
Material and methods
Study population
This study was a single-center retrospective chart review. The study population comprised all patients ≥60 years who presented to a tertiary referral trauma unit over an 8-month period (June 2018 to January 2019).
Study setting
The study was conducted at Tygerberg Academic Hospital (TBH), one of only two referral and training (Level-1 equivalent) hospitals in Cape Town, SA. On average, > 1000 injured, high-risk patients pass through TBH’s trauma department each month, making it one of the largest trauma referral centres in the country, with a drainage area home to over 6-million people [27].
Definitions
‘Elderly/Geriatric’ was defined, as per the United Nations’ definition, as patients who are ≥60 years of age at the time of admission to the trauma unit [28]. Comorbidities and diagnoses were defined according to the ICD-11 coding for mortality and morbidity [29].
Data collection
Purposeful sampling was employed whereby all eligible patients were identified by ‘Date of Birth’ as indicated in the trauma register at the triage reception. Identifying information was de-linked from the captured data. The medical records of eligible patients were reviewed to capture data associated with the variables of interest, including age, sex, comorbidities, MOI, anatomical location, and nature of the injuries, the ISS, ICU uptake, complications, length of hospital stay, and outcome (i.e., discharged home, transferred to the step-down facility, in-hospital mortality, patient absconded).
Statistical analysis
Data analysis was conducted using SPSS version 25. Descriptive statistics were computed for demographic and clinical data, presented as mean and standard deviation (SD) for quantitative variables, and counts with associated percentages for categorical variables. Bivariate correlational analysis was conducted to determine the strength and direction of associations between continuous variables. Where applicable, non-parametric tests were used to compare continuous variables between two or more independent groups. The association between two categorical variables was investigated using contingency tables and Pearson’s chi-square tests or Fisher’s exact tests. An ordinal logistic regression model was used to assess the predictive ability of the ISS score on the number of complications (coded as 0, 1, and 2+).
Survival curves, based on time to death, were estimated using Kaplan–Meier survival curves to compare the number of complications and length of hospital stay. The log-rank test was used to compare mortality between groups. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Patient demographics
Of the total 7635 trauma cases admitted to the centre over the 8-month period, elderly trauma cases accounted for 4% (n = 275). The mean age of the sample was 72 years (SD = 9, range 60–97) and over half the sample was female (157, 57.1%) (see Appendices 1, 2 and 3 for differences across age categories and between sexes).
Injury severity score (ISS) and association with age
The mean ISS for our study sample was 8 (SD = 7, range 1–61). No correlation was found between increasing age and a higher ISS (p = 0.52).
Mechanism of injury (MOI)
Of the total (n = 275), 262 (95.3%) presented with blunt injuries and 13 (4.7%) with penetrating injuries. The most frequent MOI was ‘low falls’ (57.5%), followed by ‘fall from height’ (9.8%) and ‘motor-vehicle collisions’ (MVC) (9.1%) (see Table 1 for the full list of MOIs). Of all the MOIs assessed, only MVC had a significantly higher median ISS (p < 0.05).
Notably, of the total injuries, 12% were intentionally inflicted, the majority (75.8%) as a result of ‘community assault’. Of the other intentional injuries, ‘elderly abuse’ accounted for 12.1%, domestic violence 9.1% and self-harm 3%.
Patient complications and outcomes
The majority of the sample (179/275; 65.1%) did not experience any in-hospital complications. Eighty patients (80/275; 29.1%) experienced at least one complication, and 16/275 (5.8%) experienced at least two complications (see Table 2 for list of complications). Neither age (p = 0.51) nor sex (p = 0.31) was associated with the number of complications. The ISS was positively associated with the number of complications and was found to have a strong predictive value (r = 0.45, p < 0.01).
Results of an ordinal logistic regression model that assessed the number of complications (coded 0, 1, 2+) on the ISS demonstrated that the ISS was positively associated with the number of complications (p < 0.001), with an odds ratio of 1.13 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.18), adjusted for comorbidities. When the ISS numeric values are reflected in increments of 1–3, 4–9, and ≥10, each increment was shown to be associated with a 13% increase in the odds for a greater number of complications.
Twenty-six patients (9.5%) were admitted to the ICU. The mean length of hospital stay was seven days (SD = 7; range 1–55 days), and the mean waiting time to surgery was six days (SD = 4; range 1–21 days). When corrected for mortality, a length of hospital stay of less than 10 days showed good survival rates, however, a length of hospital stay of ≥10 days was associated with an increased rate of complications.
Of the total number of patients, 76% were discharged home, 14.9% were transferred to a step-down facility, 6.5% died, and 2.5% absconded from the trauma unit. Age was not associated with mortality (p = 0.18). An ISS ≥ 10 was associated with mortality (p < 0.01), with 25% of patients with an ISS ≥ 10 dying within 10 days after admission. A significant association was evident between the number of complications and mortality (p < 0.01) (see Table 3). Of these 38% of patients with ≥2 complications were discharged home, compared with 84% of patients with no complications.
Discussion
Demographics
Compared to HICs, where more than 15% of trauma patients are elderly, the cohort of elderly patients admitted to the trauma unit during the study period made up a relatively small portion of the total number of trauma admissions [8, 20, 30,31,32]. In line with our findings, the few studies conducted in LMICs attributed less than 10% of trauma admissions to the elderly population [33,34,35].
However, when taking into consideration the short duration of the study, it is notable that although the relative number of elderly trauma admissions is a small proportion of the total, the total reflects a large trauma burden and the actual numbers of elderly injuries are substantial.
The mean age of the study population was younger (about 70 years) than the median age reflected in studies from HICs (about 80 years) but is in keeping with studies conducted in LMICs [2, 8, 33, 36, 37]. Although results in the literature vary, findings from the current study are in agreement with those reporting no correlation between age and complications or mortality [8, 38]. This may reflect the age differences in elderly trauma patients in HICs and LMICs, as studies, which determined a significant correlation between age and mortality reported the strongest correlation in those above 80 years [39].
The study population was further divided into age categories by decade (see Appendices 1 and 2) to allow for meaningful comparisons with HIC and LMIC studies that use different age cut-offs to define “geriatric/elderly” patients.
Despite other studies reporting a preponderance of elderly female patients, just over half of the study’s sample was female, implying a relatively even spread among the sexes [20, 30, 35].
ISS
The mean ISS determined in our cohort was relatively low compared to several studies from HICs [3, 4, 8, 40]. A recent study showed that elderly patients are often under-triaged which could be the case in this study, as there are no elderly specific triage criteria in SA [40, 41]. That said, the ISS is a useful measure of injury severity and a potential indicator of complications and mortality given our findings of a higher ISS being associated with both complications and mortality, in keeping with the available literature [8, 42, 43].
MOI
Our findings in terms of MOIs were similiar to those reported in several studies conducted in HICs [4, 13, 18]. For example, falls resulting in head injuries or neck-of-femur fractures, followed by MVCs, were the most frequent reasons for trauma admissions [14, 30, 32, 36, 37, 40, 44]. That said, intentionally inflicted injuries (due to community assault) and certain preventable MOIs (e.g., fall from height and PVCs) were common in our study, compared to findings from HICs [8, 23, 24, 37]. Studies conducted in LMICs showed similar assault rates to the current study [2, 32, 33, 35]. High assault rates may reflect the high crime rates, limited resources, and the relatively few programs in the public sector aimed at elderly trauma prevention evident in LMICs, such as SA, in contrast to most HICs [1, 45, 46].
Elderly victims of violence are five times more likely to die from their injuries compared to their younger counterparts, underscoring the importance of identifying the causative factors of trauma in the South African elderly population [32]. These factors are often directly related to socioeconomic issues which result in a “revolving door” effect in South African trauma departments. The healthcare system alone cannot successfully address these factors but require governmental prioritization and action.
As geriatric patients are vulnerable to abuse/neglect, healthcare professionals in trauma departments should exercise a high level of suspicion and should intentionally enquire about these issues.
Patient complications and outcomes
Notably, the ISS was strongly associated with both the number of complications and increased mortality, emphasizing the utility of the ISS in identifying elderly trauma patients most at risk of negative outcomes. An ISS ≥ 10 was strongly associated with increased mortality and although not normally considered very high, could be considered a useful predictor of negative outcomes in elderly patients in South African where resources are limited and only the most severely injured patient has access to critical care.
We determined an average length of hospital stay of 7 days which is higher than that reported in studies conducted in HICs and less than that determined in some LMICs [34, 36]. This could largely be due to the fact that SA has an inadequate healthcare staff to patient ratio and lack of resources when compared to HICs but a relatively advanced healthcare system when compared to other LMICs [45]. Nonetheless, the longer length of stay has been shown to lead to higher costs in some LMICs which adds to the existing resource constraints [33, 47]. Neither any one specific pre-exisiting comorbidity nor MOI was significantly associated with a longer length of hospital stay.
The mean waiting time from admission to surgery of 6 days determined in our cohort reflects the extended waiting times of stable elderly patients who require surgical management in South African public hospitals.
The mortality rate determined in the current study was higher than that found in the majority of studies from both HICs and LMICs [30, 31, 33,34,35,36]. Serious steps should be taken to optimize the management of elderly trauma patients in the South African context. Some considerations include: taking note of the ISS (even if seemingly low compared to younger patients), enquiring about elderly abuse/neglect, helping to enable a more geriatric-friendly environment, and ensuring timely medical management of elderly trauma patients.
Recommendations
Elderly injury risks are under-reported, under-recognised, and need to be prioritized in the South African setting. The public should be educated about these risks while surveillance strategies and vigilance of healthcare workers in the trauma emergency setting should be improved.
As age and co-morbid diseases were not found to be predictive of mortality, we recommend that the importance of an ISS ≥ 10 be noted in elderly trauma patients.
Ideally, special triage systems aimed at improving the accuracy of assessing the severity of injury in the elderly, such as the Fragility Index, should be implemented in South African trauma centres, but the potential value should be weighed up against the availability of resources [48].
Future directions include research pertaining to transport-related injuries, the role of alcohol, and the safety of the household environment in the elderly population. Research relevant to LMICs in sub-Saharan Africa is necessary to establish more accurate baseline data that could be used to inform healthcare policy-making. Given the prediction that the number of elderly patients in SA will outnumber those aged 5 and under by 2040, a shift towards age-specific healthcare will be required in the near future to meet rising demands [49].
Limitations
This was a single-centre retrospective review conducted over a relatively short time period. The retrospective nature of the study has inherent limitations such as the potential for missing data. Findings from this study may not be transferable to elderly trauma patients from other trauma centres in SA as the Western Cape has among the highest rates of gang-related violence and assault in the country [50, 51].
While our study depicted an ISS cut off the value of 10 to be statistically significant, we realize that traditionally the ISS categories are ≤8, 9–16, ≤25 and >25, however, this did not occur in our patient cohort.
References
Statistics South Africa (2018) Victims of Crime Survey 2018 [Internet]. Pretoria: Statistics SA. http://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/P0341/P03412018.pdf. Accessed Oct 2020
Da Costa JP, Laing J, Kong VY et al (2020) A review of geriatric injuries at a major trauma centre in South Africa. S Afr Med J 110(1):44–48
Ferreira M, Lindgren P (2007) Elderly abuse and neglect in South Africa: a case of marginalization, disrespect, exploitation and violence. International Longevity Centre–South Africa, University of Cape Town, Faculty of Health Sciences. http://www.ilcsa.uct.ac.za/sites/default/files/image_tool/images/158/Programmes/Eradicating_age_discrimination/Elderabuse_Neglect_SA.doc. Accessed Jan 2020
Bonne S, Schuerer DJE (2013) Trauma in the older adult. Clin Geriatr Med 29:137–150
Wright AS, Schurr MJ (2001) Geriatric trauma: review and recommendations. WMJ 100:57–59
Reske-Nielsen C, Medzon R (2016) Geriatric trauma. Emerg Med Clin N Am 34:483–500
Lenartowicz M, Parkovnick M, McFarlan A et al (2012) An evaluation of a proactive geriatric trauma consultation service. Ann Surg 256:1098–1101
Gowing R, Jain MK (2007) Injury patterns and outcomes associated with elderly trauma victims in Kingston, Ontario. Can J Surg 50(6):437–444
Valley VT, Hepp H, DeBehnke DJ et al (1994) A profile of geriatric trauma in southeastern Wisconsin. Wis Med J 93:165–168
Min L, Burruss S, Morley E et al (2013) A simple clinical risk nomogram to predict mortality-associated geriatric complications in severely injured geriatric patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 74(4):1125–1132
Roth BJ, Velmahos GC, Oder DB et al (2001) Penetrating trauma in patients older than 55 years: a case-control study. Injury 32:551–554
Nagy KK, Smith RF, Roberts RR et al (2000) Prognosis of penetrating trauma in elderly patients: a comparison with younger patients. J Trauma 49:190–193
Ferrera PC, Bartfield JM, D’Andrea CC (2000) Outcomes of admitted geriatric trauma victims. Am J Emerg Med 18:575–580
Fisher JM, Bates C, Banerjee J (2017) The growing challenge of major trauma in older people: a role for comprehensive geriatric assessment. Age Ageing 46:709–712
Kara H, Bayir A, Ak A et al (2014) Trauma in elderly patients evaluated in hospital emergency department in Konya, Turkey: a retrospective study. Clin Interv Aging 9:17–21
Naraynsingh R, Sammy I, Paul JF et al (2015) Trauma in the elderly in Trinidad and Tobago: a cross-sectional study. Eur J Emerg Med 22(3):219–221
Gomberg BF, Gruen GS, Smith WR et al (1999) Outcomes in acute orthopedic trauma:a review of 130,506 patients by age. Injury 30:431–437
Tepas JJ, Veldenz HC, Lottenberg L et al (2000) Elderly injury: a profile of trauma experience in the Sunshine (Retirement) State. J Trauma 48:581–584
Gilles D (1999) Elderly trauma: they are different. Aust Crit Care 12:24–30
Ng W, Fujishima S, Suzuki M et al (2002) Characteristics of elderly patients presenting to the emergency department with injury. Keio J Med 51:11–16
Rothschild JM, Bates DW, Leape LL (2000) Preventable medical injuries in older patients. Arch Intern Med 160:2717–2728
Baker SP, O’Neil B, Haddon W et al (1974) The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma 14(3):187–196
Tohira H, Jacobs I, Mountain D et al (2012) Systematic review of predictive performance of injury severity scoring tools. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 10(20):63
Konda SR, Lack WD, Seymour RB et al (2015) Mechanism of injury differentiates risk factors for mortality in geriatrics trauma patients. J Orthop Trauma 29(7):331–336
Hammer PM, Storey AC, Bell T et al (2016) Improving geriatric trauma outcomes: a small step towards a big problem. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 81:162–167
Statistics South Africa (2020) Mid- year population estimates [Internet]. Pretoria: Statistics SA. http://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/P0302/P03022020.pdf. Accessed Oct 2020
Tygerberg Hospital (2012) Manual for Interns and Doctors [Internet]. Western Cape Government Health. https://www.westerncape.gov.za/sites/www.westerncape.gov.za/files/2016_interns_manual_1.pdf. Accessed Mar 2020.
United Nations (2017) World Population Prospects [Internet]. https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/files/documents/2020/Jan/un_2017_world_population_prospects-2017_revision_databooklet.pdf. Accessed Sep 2021
World Health Organization (2019) ICD-11 for Mortality and Morbidity Statistics (ICD-11 MMS) 2018 version [Internet]. World Health Organization. https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en. Accessed May 2020.
Gioffrè-Florio M, Murabito LM, Visalli C et al (2018) Trauma in elderly patients: a study of prevalence, comorbidities and gender differences. G Chir 39:35–40
Kahn JH, Magauran BG, Olshaker JS et al (2016) Current trends in geriatric emergency medicine. Emerg Med Clin N Am 34:435–452
Brooks SE, Peetz AB (2017) Evidence-based care of geriatric trauma patients. Surg Clin N Am 97:1157–1174
Gallaher JR, Haac BE, Geyer AJ et al (2016) Injury characteristics and outcomes in elderly trauma patients in sub-Saharan Africa. World J Surg 40:2650–2657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3622-y
Kara H, Bayir A, Ak A et al (2014) Trauma in elderly patients evaluated in a hospital emergency department in Konya, Turkey: a retrospective study. Clin Interv Aging 9:17–21
Naraynsingh R, Sammy I, Paul JF et al (2015) Trauma in the elderly in Trinidad and Tobago: a cross-sectional study. Eur J Emerg Med 22:219–221
Ahmed N, Kuo Y (2019) Evaluating the outcomes of blunt thoracic trauma in elderly patients following a fall from a ground level: higher level care institution vs. lower level care institution. Eur J Emerg Med https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-019-01230-1
Verhoeff K, Glen P, Taheri A et al (2018) Implementation and adoption of advanced care planning in the elderly trauma patient. World J Emerg Surg 13:40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-018-0201-6
Stevens CL, Torke AM (2016) Geriatric trauma: a clinical and ethical review. J Trauma Nurs 23:36–41
Wardle TD (1999) Co-morbid factors in trauma patients. Br Med Bull 55(4):744–756
Uribe-Leitz T, Jarman MP, Sturgeon DJ et al (2020) National study of triage and access to trauma centers for older adults. Ann Emerg Med 75(2):125–135
Emergency Medicine Society of South Africa (2020) The South African Triage Scale (SATS) Training Manual 2020 [Internet]. https://emssa.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/SATS-Manual-A5-LR-spreads.pdf. Accessed Mar 2021
Grossman MD, Miller D, Scaff DW et al (2002) When is an elder old? Effect of preexisting conditions on mortality in geriatric trauma. J Trauma 52:242–246
Rzepka SG, Malangoni MA, Rimm AA (2001) Geriatric trauma hospitalization in the United States: a population-based study. J Clin Epidemiol 54:627–633
Kannus P, Sievänen H, Palvanen M et al (2005) Prevention of falls and consequent injuries in elderly people. Lancet 366:1885–1893
Dell AJ, Kahn D (2018) Surgical resources in South Africa: an international comparison and deficit calculation. World J Surg 42(2):541–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4176-3
Naidoo K, Van Wyk J (2019) What the elderly experience and expect from primary care services in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med 11(1):e1–e6
Siracuse JJ, Odell DD, Gondek SP et al (2012) Health care and socioeconomic impact of falls in the elderly. Am J Surg 203(3):335–338
Kojima G, Iliffe S, Walters K (2018) Frailty index as a predictor of mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing 47(2):193–200
Day C (2017) Gray A (2017) Health and related indicators. S Afr Health Rev 1:217–339
Human Science Research Council (2012) Fourth South African National Prevalence, Incidence and Behaviour Survey [Internet]. http://www.hsrc.ac.za/en/. Accessed June 2020
South African Police Service (2020) SAPS Crime Information Analysis Centre [Internet]. https://www.saps.gov.za/services/crimestats.php. Accessed Oct 2020
Acknowledgments
We would like to acknowledge Dr. Lindi Martin for her assistance in editing this manuscript and support throughout the process.
Funding
No funds, grants, or other financial support were received.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Tygerberg Hospital and the Undergraduate Research Ethics Committee of Stellenbosch University (no. U19/01/007) and was performed in accordance with the ethical standards described in the Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.
Informed consent
A waiver of consent was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Tygerberg Hospital and the Undergraduate Research Ethics Committee of Stellenbosch University.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix 1
Demographics and injuries according to age categories.
Total n = 275 (%) | 60–69 n = 125 (%) | 70–79 n = 80 (%) | 80–89 n = 55 (%) | ≥90 n = 15 (%) | p-values | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean age | 72.4 | 63.8 | 74.1 | 83.9 | 91.5 | |
Male | 118 (42.9) | 73 (58.4) | 29 (36.3) | 12 (21.8) | 4 (26.7) | |
Female | 157 (57.1) | 52 (41.6) | 51 (63.7) | 43 (78.2) | 11 (73.3) | |
Mean ISS [range] | 8 [1–61] | 8.4 [1–61] | 7.7 [1–32] | 7.7 [1–25] | 8.3 [3–16] | 0.616 |
Blunt injuries | 262 (95.3) | 114 (91.2) | 79 (98.8) | 54 (98.2) | 15 (100) | 0.059 |
Penetrating injuries | 13 (4.7) | 11 (8.8) | 1 (1.3) | 1 (1.8) | 0 | 0.059 |
MOI | ||||||
Low falls | 158 (57.5) | 52 (41.6) | 53 (66.3) | 40 (72.7) | 13 (86.7) | <0.001* |
Fall from height | 27 (9.8) | 11 (8.8) | 10 (12.5) | 5 (9.1) | 1 (6.7) | 0.842 |
MVC | 25 (9.1) | 21 (16.8) | 3 (3.8) | 1 (1.8) | 0 | 0.001* |
Community assault | 22 (8.0) | 12 (9.6) | 4 (5.0) | 5 (9.1) | 1 (6.7) | 0.663 |
PVC | 19 (6.9) | 11 (8.8) | 5 (6.3) | 3 (5.5) | 0 | 0.731 |
Stab injuries | 6 (2.2) | 6 (4.8) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.109 |
Seizure-related injuries | 5 (1.8) | 4 (3.2) | 1 (1.3) | 0 | 0 | 0.630 |
Gunshot wounds | 4 (1.5) | 3 (2.4) | 1 (1.3) | 0 | 0 | 0.854 |
Other | 9 (3.3) | 5 (4.0) | 3 (3.8) | 1 (1.8) | 0 | 0.895 |
Intentional injuries | 33 (12.0) | 21 (16.8) | 5 (6.3) | 6 (10.9) | 1 (6.7) | 0.140 |
Appendix 2
Complications and outcomes according to age categories.
Total n = 275 (%) | 60–69 n = 125 (%) | 70–79 n = 80 (%) | 80–89 n = 55 (%) | ≥90 n = 15 (%) | p-values | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patients with 1 complication | 80 (29.1) | 32 (25.6) | 23 (28.7) | 17 (30.9) | 8 (53.3) | 0.177 |
Patients with ≥2 complications | 16 (5.8) | 9 (7.2) | 5 (6.3) | 2 (3.6) | 0 | 0.781 |
Complications | ||||||
Nosocomial infection | 23 (8.4) | 15 (12.0) | 4 (5.0) | 4 (7.3) | 0 | 0.483 |
Neurological | 30 (10.9) | 17 (13.6) | 8 (10.0) | 3 (5.5) | 2 (13.3) | 0.392 |
Respiratory/cardiological | 12 (4.4) | 6 (4.8) | 1 (1.3) | 2 (3.6) | 3 (20.0) | 0.030* |
Hematological | 17 (6.2) | 5 (4.0) | 4 (5.0) | 5 (9.1) | 3 (20.0) | 0.045* |
Endocrine/metabolic | 12 (4.4) | 3 (2.4) | 6 (7.5) | 3 (5.5) | 0 | 0.325 |
Pressure sores | 7 (2.5) | 2 (1.6) | 3 (3.8) | 2 (3.6) | 0 | 0.689 |
Psychological | 8 (2.9) | 3 (2.4) | 4 (5.0) | 1 (1.8) | 0 | 0.731 |
Ophthalmological | 3 (1.1) | 3 (2.4) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.419 |
Other | 10 (3.6) | 6 (4.8) | 3 (3.8) | 1 (1.8) | 0 | 0.923 |
Discharged from hospital | 41 (14.9) | 20 (16.0) | 16 (20.0) | 3 (5.5) | 2 (13.3) | 0.100 |
Discharged home | 209 (76.0) | 96 (76.8) | 56 (70.0) | 48 (87.3) | 9 (60.0) | 0.047* |
Died | 18 (6.5) | 7 (5.6) | 5 (6.3) | 3 (5.5) | 3 (20.0) | 0.232 |
Absconded | 7 (2.5) | 2 (1.6) | 3 (3.8) | 1 (1.8) | 1 (6.7) | 0.367 |
Appendix 3
Results according to sex.
Total n = 275 (%) | Male n = 118 (%) | Female n = 157 (%) | p-values | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mean age [SD] | 72.4 [9.0] | 69.0 [8.0] | 74.9 [9.6] | 0.004* |
Mean ISS [range] | 8.0 [1–61] | 8.6 [1–43] | 7.7 [1–61] | 0.233 |
Blunt injuries | 262 (95.3) | 107 (90.68) | 155 (98.73) | 0.002* |
Penetrating injuries | 13 (4.7) | 11 (9.32) | 2 (1.27) | 0.002* |
MOI | ||||
Low falls | 158 (57.5) | 44 (37.3) | 114 (72.6) | <0.001* |
Fall from height | 27 (9.8) | 16 (13.6) | 11 (7.0) | 0.071 |
Motor vehicle collision | 25 (9.1) | 15 (12.7) | 10 (6.4) | 0.070 |
Community assault | 22 (8.0) | 17 (14.4) | 5 (3.2) | 0.001* |
Pedestrian vehicle collision | 19 (6.9) | 10 (8.5) | 9 (5.7) | 0.375 |
Stab injuries | 6 (2.2) | 6 (5.1) | 0 | 0.006* |
Seizure-related injuries | 5 (1.8) | 2 (1.7) | 3 (1.9) | 1.000 |
Gunshot wounds | 4 (1.5) | 4 (3.4) | 0 | 0.033* |
Other | 9 (3.3) | 4 (3.4) | 5 (3.2) | 0.925 |
Intentional injuries | 33 (12.0) | 27 (22.9) | 6 (3.8) | <0.001* |
Patients with at least 1 complication | 80 (29.1) | 40 (33.9) | 40 (25.5) | 0.128 |
Patients with ≥2 complications | 16 (5.8) | 6 (5.1) | 10 (6.4) | 0.652 |
Complications | ||||
Nosocomial infection | 23 (8.4) | 12 (10.2) | 11 (7.0) | 0.388 |
Neurological | 30 (10.9) | 15 (12.7) | 15 (9.6) | 0.406 |
Respiratory/cardiological | 12 (4.4) | 6 (5.1) | 6 (3.8) | 0.612 |
Haematological | 17 (6.2) | 8 (6.8) | 9 (5.7) | 0.944 |
Endocrine/metabolic | 12 (4.4) | 5 (4.2) | 7 (4.5) | 0.929 |
Pressure sores | 7 (2.5) | 2 (1.7) | 5 (3.2) | 0.702 |
Psychological | 8 (2.9) | 4 (3.4) | 4 (2.5) | 0.728 |
Ophthalmological | 3 (1.1) | 2 (1.7) | 1 (0.6) | 0.579 |
Other | 10 (3.6) | 7 (5.9) | 3 (1.9) | 0.123 |
Discharged from hospital | 41 (14.9) | 24 (20.3) | 17 (10.8) | 0.028* |
Discharged home | 209 (76.0) | 79 (66.9) | 130 (82.8) | 0.002* |
Died | 18 (6.5) | 11 (9.3) | 7 (4.5) | 0.107 |
Absconded | 7 (2.5) | 4 (3.4) | 3 (1.9) | 0.467 |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Breedt, D.S., Steyn, E. Geriatric Trauma in a High-Volume Trauma Centre in Cape Town: How Do We Compare?. World J Surg 46, 582–590 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-021-06416-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-021-06416-6