Abstract
As the routine use for CT increases, there is an opportunity to increase the detection rate of unsuspected and asymptomatic colorectal cancers. This pictorial essay provides abundant examples of the typical morphologic appearances of colorectal cancer in the unprepared colorectum. Many examples of lesions that were missed in clinical practice are illustrated with lessons on how to avoid these errors. Atypical appearances of colorectal cancer are also illustrated. The overall aim is to increase the detection rate of colorectal cancer at routine CT.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The use of CT for the evaluation of a variety of abdominal symptoms is commonplace [1]. These imaging studies represent an opportunity to diagnose unrecognized colorectal cancer, potentially at an early stage. Previous reports have shown the prospective miss rate of colorectal cancer at CT (49%) and the commonest morphologic appearances of these lesions [2]. The use of routine CT for detecting colorectal cancer has also been described by others [3,4,5].
The objective of this pictorial essay is to provide the radiologist with images of missed colorectal cancers and selected unusual presentations encountered while interpreting a routine CT examination. A variety of techniques were used; however, the majority (87%) were performed with intravenous contrast material. Cases are grouped to illustrate the variable patterns of these lesions to facilitate enhanced detection. Each case includes axial, coronal and sagittal images. The clinical scenario for each patient example is given to provide clinical context and understanding of patient symptoms and the effects of delays in diagnosis and treatment that can occur. The aim is to increase detection of colorectal cancer at routine CT.
Morphologic types and typical appearances
Three main morphologic appearances of colorectal cancer exist including annular (Fig. 1), polypoid (Fig. 2) and asymmetric (Fig. 3) bowel wall thickening. Annular lesions (sometimes referred to as concentric) encircle the bowel lumen, thicken the bowel wall and narrow the lumen of the colon. Polypoid lesions are predominantly intraluminal and present with a soft tissue mass of variable size within the bowel. Asymmetric lesions appear to thicken only a portion of the bowel wall. Awareness of these patterns of colorectal cancer will aid in their detection (Figs. 1, 2 and 3).
Lesions that were prospectively missed but identified retrospectively
Many of the lesions that were prospectively missed were performed for indications not specifically related to the colon. Abdominal pain was the commonest indication, but other symptoms or findings like constipation, bleeding or anemia were present in nearly half of patients with colorectal cancers that were missed on the initial interpretation [2]. Missed lesions were of advanced stage and most often located in the ascending colon and rectum [2]. Common radiologic findings among missed lesions were bowel wall thickening (91%), luminal narrowing (73%) and pericolonic soft tissue stranding or prominent pericolonic lymph nodes (35%) [2]. Nearly half of missed colorectal cancers were of concentric morphology, while asymmetric bowel wall thickening and polypoid morphology were each found in approximately 25% of patients [2]. For examples see Figs. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11.
Unusual radiologic appearances of colorectal cancers
Colorectal cancers do not always present as one of the three most common morphologic types. Examples of different presentations to consider are shown in Figs. 12, 13, 14 and 15. These include a mass with a complicating intussusception, a mass with vivid enhancement, a surprisingly large mass with mesenteric and nodal extension, and a perforated carcinoma. Awareness of these variations in presentation can be helpful in arriving at an accurate and timely diagnosis.
Summary
This pictorial essay provides the radiologist with clinical scenarios and examples of the typical appearance of most colorectal cancers, many examples of lesions that were missed in clinical practice, and atypical presentations of colorectal cancers. Radiologists with the knowledge of these tumor patterns combined with an approach to track the colon carefully at CT will identify the majority of colorectal cancers in practice.
Data availability
All relevant data supporting the findings of this study are reported in the article.
Code availability
Not applicable.
Abbreviations
- CT:
-
Computed tomography
- IV:
-
Intravenous
References
Smith-Bindman R, Kwan ML, Marlow EC, Theis MK, Bolch W, Cheng SY, Bowles EJA, Duncan JR, Greenlee RT, Kushi LH, Pole JD, Rahm AK, Stout NK, Weinmann S, Miglioretti DL (2019) Trends in Use of Medical Imaging in US Health Care Systems and in Ontario, Canada, 2000-2016. JAMA 322:843-856. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.11456
Johnson CD, Flicek KT, Mead-Harvey C, Quillen JK (2023) Strategies for improving colorectal cancer detection with routine computed tomography. Abdom Radiol (NY) 48:1891-1899. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-023-03884-3
Klang E, Eifer M, Kopylov U, Belsky V, Raskin S, Konen E, Amitai MM (2017) Pitfalls in diagnosing colon cancer on abdominal CT. Clin Radiol 72:858-863. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2017.06.007
Ozel B, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Schumacher C, Bhargava N, Winter TC (2010) Accuracy of routine nontargeted CT without colonography technique for the detection of large colorectal polyps and cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 53:911-918. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181d5de13
Than M, Witherspoon J, Shami J, Patil P, Saklani A (2015) Diagnostic miss rate for colorectal cancer: an audit. Ann Gastroenterol 28:94-98
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the assistance of Sonia Watson, PhD, in preparation of the manuscript.
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None.
Ethical approval
Exempt.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Flicek, K.T., Johnson, C.D. Pictorial essay: improving diagnostic effectiveness of colorectal cancer at CT. Abdom Radiol 49, 2060–2073 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04219-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04219-6