Abstract
Pheochromocytoma is a neuroendocrine tumor arising in the adrenal medulla with varied imaging appearances and associated risk of serious cardiovascular complications if left undiagnosed and untreated. It is discovered incidentally in up to 70% of cases due to the increase in use of CT in clinical practice. Biopsy can have life-threatening consequences, so imaging is crucial for diagnosis and surgical planning. The purpose of this review is to demonstrate unusual CT appearances of pheochromocytoma and enhance diagnostic confidence in cases discovered incidentally. High level of suspicion for pheochromocytoma based on CT findings, along with urinary metanephrine levels, can obviate the need for additional expensive imaging.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Pheochromocytoma is a rare neuroendocrine tumor arising in the adrenal medulla, which accounts for elevated blood pressure in a small minority of adults with hypertension and is benign in 90% of cases [1,2,3]. Nonetheless, identification is important because uncontrolled catecholamine secretion increases the risk of serious cardiovascular complications [4, 5]. Approximately 11–21% of patients are asymptomatic [6], while others may present with symptoms mistaken for underlying cardiovascular conditions (e.g., palpitations) [3]. Given the protean clinical presentation and exponential growth of CT scanning, most pheochromocytomas are now identified incidentally [7, 8]. Once suspected on CT, definitive diagnosis relies on clinical and biochemical confirmation, as biopsy can prove catastrophic [9]. The most reliable indicator is urinary 24-h fractionated metanephrine level with a sensitivity of 90–97% and specificity of 69–98% [10, 11].
Notwithstanding the important role that imaging plays in the detection of unsuspected pheochromocytoma, CT diagnosis can be challenging because of the wide range of imaging appearances [12, 13]. The purpose of this pictorial essay is to demonstrate a series of pheochromocytomas that deviate from the classic finding of a solid hypervascular mass. The aim is to familiarize radiologists with the spectrum of CT appearances, facilitate efficient diagnosis through laboratory testing, and potentially obviate additional expensive imaging for further characterization.
Classic pheochromocytoma: pearls and pitfalls
The classic pheochromocytoma is a round or oval, hypervascular, heterogeneously enhancing mass (Fig. 1). The early intense enhancement is reportedly due to its capillary-rich framework [12]. Vascular pheochromocytomas can exceed washout thresholds on adrenal protocol CT and be mistaken for a lipid-poor adenoma [14, 15]. Accordingly, adrenal protocol CT washout is not reliable for distinguishing these two pathologies. If the venous enhancement level exceeds 130 HU (Fig. 2), the lesion is more likely a pheochromocytoma [14]. If the adrenal mass is detected incidentally on arterial phase CT, arterial phase attenuation of 110 HU or higher (Figs. 1, 2) is not typical of adenoma but is characteristic of pheochromocytoma. Arterial phase enhancement of > 110 HU was 58% sensitive and 100% specific for pheochromocytomas in one study [16].
Small pheochromocytoma
According to the World Health Organization classification of adrenal medullary nodules, nodules less than 1 cm, which were previously considered to be hyperplastic nodules, are now considered small pheochromocytomas based on molecular findings [17] (Figs. 3, 4). Understanding that unsuspected pheochromocytomas can be very small is a caveat to the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (CMS MIPS) measure that advises against recommending follow-up for incidental adrenal nodules less than 1 cm [18].
Cystic or necrotic pheochromocytoma
As pheochromocytomas enlarge, the masses tend to undergo ischemia and necrosis, which accounts for central degeneration and fibrosis, reflected as heterogeneous enhancement on CT (Fig. 5) [19]. Predominantly cystic pheochromocytoma is rare but is the result of the same pathophysiology of hemorrhagic degeneration and/or necrosis (Fig. 6) [20]. The “ring sign,” defined as a hyperenhancing rim, is fairly characteristic of a cystic pheochromocytoma and was observed in more than 40% of cases in one series [21]. A cystic pheochromocytoma can be distinguished from other cystic adrenal masses (pseudocysts, lymphangiomas) due to variable degrees of complexity, such as a thick enhancing wall (Figs. 7, 8). In contradistinction, adrenal pseudocysts resulting from prior hemorrhage demonstrate a thin uniform wall that can be calcified. Pheochromocytoma may also present as a multiloculated cystic mass with septations (Figs. 7, 8).
Bilateral pheochromocytoma
Pheochromocytomas have the highest heritability among all endocrine tumors, with nearly 35–40% being hereditary in origin [22, 23]. The occurrence of bilateral pheochromocytomas is 10% in sporadic cases, 50–80% in multiple endocrine neoplasia type II (MEN2), and 40–80% in Von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) [22]. In patients with bilateral pheochromocytoma, a syndromic cause should be considered, most common being MEN2A or MEN2B, neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1) (Fig. 9), and hereditary pheochromocytoma paraganglioma (HPP) syndrome (Fig. 10) [24]. HPP syndrome is characterized by rare benign tumors of the neural crest usually seen along the paravertebral axis from the skull base to the pelvis, and these patients can also develop renal cancers, gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), and pituitary adenomas [24]. VHL is a syndrome characterized by multisystem benign and malignant tumors such as central nervous system and retinal hemangioblastomas, pheochromocytoma, renal cell carcinoma (Fig. 11), pancreatic cyst, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, endolymphatic sac tumor, and epididymal and broad ligament cystadenomas [25].
Infiltrating pheochromocytoma
Pheochromocytoma can present as an infiltrating suprarenal or perirenal mass (Figs. 12, 13). Infiltrating margins and invasion of local structures are not indicators of malignancy [26]. No recognized histological system defines the biological aggressiveness of pheochromocytomas. Hence, all pheochromocytomas are considered to have metastatic potential according to the fourth edition of the World Health Organization classification of endocrine tumors, which has replaced the term ‘malignant’ with ‘metastatic’ for this group of tumors [17, 27]. Approximately 5 to 10% of pheochromocytomas metastasize [15]. Differential diagnosis for this infiltrative growth pattern includes adrenocortical carcinoma, exophytic renal mass, lymphoma, and metastatic disease. Clinical presentation and biochemical testing will be essential in differentiating these diagnostic possibilities.
Metastatic pheochromocytoma
It is important to note that metastatic, aggressive, and recurrent paragangliomas are associated with SDHB gene mutation. Extraadrenal pheochromocytomas are more likely to be malignant, approximately 29–40% [15, 23]. Typical features suggestive of aggressiveness are large size, extraadrenal origin, and high levels of catecholamines in blood or urine [16, 23, 28]. As no CT features of the mass are 100% specific for malignancy, the only reliable criterion according to the World Health Organization definition is distant metastasis (Fig. 14) [17]. Therefore, the role of CT is crucial in detecting distant metastasis to make a diagnosis of metastatic pheochromocytoma. Approximately 10–30% of patients with pheochromocytomas have been found to have metastasis [29].
Pheochromocytoma with hemorrhage
Bleeding and rupture of a pheochromocytoma (Fig. 15) is rare [30], with approximately 50 reported cases between 1950 and 2000 [31]. While the exact mechanism of bleeding and rupture in a pheochromocytoma is unknown, it is believed to be associated with an increase in intracapsular pressure, due to various factors, such as trauma. Additional causes include rapid tumor growth, which can result in the tumor outgrowing its blood supply, leading to central necrosis and hemorrhage [32]. In addition, systemic hypertension due to the elevated catecholamines secreted by the tumor leads to vasoconstriction in the central vessels of the tumor, resulting in necrosis. Also, alpha-1 adrenergic blockers used to treat hypertension associated with pheochromocytoma account for intratumoral hemorrhage and avascular necrosis by lowering systemic blood pressure, which in turn causes vasodilatation within the tumor and subsequent engorgement and interstitial hemorrhage, thus increasing intracapsular pressure [32,33,34,35].
Intratumoral hemorrhage and rupture cause a large amount of catecholamines to be released into the circulation triggering a hypertensive crisis, severe headache, abdominal pain, ileus, sweating, and elevated serum creatinine levels [30]. Therefore, accurate and timely diagnosis is essential for the management of a life-threatening condition such as pheochromocytoma multisystem crises (PMC), in which patients present with encephalopathy, hemodynamic instability, hyperthermia, and multiorgan failure [36].
Conclusion
Diagnosis of pheochromocytoma on CT of the chest and/or abdomen is important as these tumors are often unsuspected and unrestricted catecholamine release over time results in morbidity for patients. Radiologists can facilitate diagnosis and guide management decisions by understanding the range of CT imaging features and recommending a cost-effective work up that begins with clinical assessment and laboratory tests.
References
Reisch N, Peczkowska M, Januszewicz A, Neumann HP. Pheochromocytoma: presentation, diagnosis and treatment. J Hypertens 2006;24(12):2331-2339. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0000251887.01885.54
Havekes B, Lai EW, Corssmit EP, Romijn JA, Timmers HJ, Pacak K. Detection and treatment of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas: current standing of MIBG scintigraphy and future role of PET imaging. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2008;52(4):419-429.
Tsvetov G, Shimon I, Benbassat C. Adrenal incidentaloma: clinical characteristics and comparison between patients with and without extraadrenal malignancy. J Endocrinol Invest 2007;30(8):647-652. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03347444
Stolk RF, Bakx C, Mulder J, Timmers HJ, Lenders JW. Is the excess cardiovascular morbidity in pheochromocytoma related to blood pressure or to catecholamines? The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 2013;98(3):1100-1106.
Zelinka T, Petrák O, Turková H, Holaj R, Štrauch B, Kršek M, Vrankova A, Musil Z, Dušková J, Kubinyi J. High incidence of cardiovascular complications in pheochromocytoma. Hormone and Metabolic Research 2012;44(05):379-384.
Kopetschke R, Slisko M, Kilisli A, Tuschy U, Wallaschofski H, Fassnacht M, Ventz M, Beuschlein F, Reincke M, Reisch N. Frequent incidental discovery of phaeochromocytoma: data from a German cohort of 201 phaeochromocytoma. European journal of endocrinology 2009;161(2):355-361.
Glazer D, Mayo-Smith W. Management of incidental adrenal masses: an update. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2019 Jul 29 [Epub].
Oshmyansky AR, Mahammedi A, Dackiw A, Ball DW, Schulick RD, Zeiger MA, Siegelman SS. Serendipity in the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma. Journal of computer assisted tomography 2013;37(5):820-823.
Bravo EL. Pheochromocytoma: current concepts in diagnosis, localization, and management. Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice 1983;10(1):075-086.
Ilias I, Pacak K. Current approaches and recommended algorithm for the diagnostic localization of pheochromocytoma. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 2004;89(2):479-491.
Beierwaltes WH. Endocrine imaging: parathyroid, adrenal cortex and medulla, and other endocrine tumors. Part II. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 1991;32(8):1627-1639.
Blake MA, Kalra MK, Maher MM, Sahani DV, Sweeney AT, Mueller PR, Hahn PF, Boland GW. Pheochromocytoma: an imaging chameleon. Radiographics 2004;24(suppl_1):S87-S99.
Leung K, Stamm M, Raja A, Low G. Pheochromocytoma: the range of appearances on ultrasound, CT, MRI, and functional imaging. American Journal of Roentgenology 2013;200(2):370-378.
Northcutt BG, Trakhtenbroit MA, Gomez EN, Fishman EK, Johnson PT. Adrenal adenoma and pheochromocytoma: comparison of multidetector CT venous enhancement levels and washout characteristics. Journal of computer assisted tomography 2016;40(2):194-200.
Kim KY, Kim JH, Hong AR, Seong M-W, Lee KE, Kim S-J, Kim SW, Shin CS, Kim SY. Disentangling of malignancy from benign pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas. PLoS One 2016;11(12):e0168413.
Northcutt BG, Raman SP, Long C, Oshmyansky AR, Siegelman SS, Fishman EK, Johnson PT. MDCT of adrenal masses: can dual-phase enhancement patterns be used to differentiate adenoma and pheochromocytoma? American Journal of Roentgenology 2013;201(4):834-839.
Lam AK-y. Update on adrenal tumours in 2017 World Health Organization (WHO) of endocrine tumours. Endocrine pathology 2017;28(3):213–227.
Holman J, Salvatori R, Fishman EK, Johnson PT. Caveat regarding CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment Systems incidental adrenal nodule measure. Abdominal Radiology 2019;44(3):1152-1154.
Al-Waeli DK, Mansour AA, Haddad NS. Reliability of adrenal computed tomography in predicting the functionality of adrenal incidentaloma. Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal 2020;27(2):101.
Munden R, Adams D, Curry N. Cystic pheochromocytoma: radiologic diagnosis. Southern medical journal 1993;86(11):1302-1305.
Velasquez G, Nath P, Zollikofer C, Valdez-Davila O, Castaneda-Zuniga WR, Formanek A, Amplatz K. The “ring sign” of necrotic pheochromocytoma. Radiology 1979;131(1):69-71.
Renard J, Clerici T, Licker M, Triponez F. Pheochromocytoma and abdominal paraganglioma. Journal of visceral surgery 2011;148(6):e409-e416.
Linnoila RI, Keiser HR, Steinberg SM, Lack EE. Histopathology of benign versus malignant sympathoadrenal paragangliomas: clinicopathologic study of 120 cases including unusual histologic features. Human pathology 1990;21(11):1168-1180.
Rednam SP, Erez A, Druker H, Janeway KA, Kamihara J, Kohlmann WK, Nathanson KL, Tomlinson GE, Villani A, Voss SD. Von Hippel–Lindau and hereditary pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma syndromes: clinical features, genetics, and surveillance recommendations in childhood. Clinical Cancer Research 2017;23(12):e68-e75.
Chittiboina P, Lonser RR. Von Hippel–Lindau disease. Handbook of clinical neurology 2015;132:139-156.
Thompson LD. Pheochromocytoma of the Adrenal gland Scaled Score (PASS) to separate benign from malignant neoplasms: a clinicopathologic and immunophenotypic study of 100 cases. The American journal of surgical pathology 2002;26(5):551-566.
L.D. T, W.F. Y, A. K, P. K. Malignant adrenal phaeochromocytoma. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours Pathology & Genetics Tumours of Endocrine Organs., 2004: 147–150.
John H, Ziegler WH, Hauri D, Jaeger P. Pheochromocytomas: can malignant potential be predicted? Urology 1999;53(4):679-683.
Wang J, Yuan D, Lu Y, Ma Y, Huang B, Yang Y, Zhao J. A large pheochromocytoma requiring aortic and inferior vena caval reconstruction: A case report. Medicine 2019;98(29).
Elmoheen A, Yousry M, Elmesery A, Bashir K. Ruptured functioning adrenal tumour, atypical presentation with renal colic and hypertension. BMJ Case Reports CP 2020;13(12):e236050.
Kobayashi T, Iwai A, Takahashi R, Ide Y, Nishizawa K, Mitsumori K. Spontaneous rupture of adrenal pheochromocytoma: review and analysis of prognostic factors. Journal of surgical oncology 2005;90(1):31-35.
Maruyama M, Sato H, Yagame M, Shoji S, Terachi T, Osamura RY. Spontaneous rupture of pheochromocytoma and its clinical features: a case report. Tokai J Exp Clin Med 2008;33(3):110-115.
Lenders JW, Eisenhofer G, Mannelli M, Pacak K. Phaeochromocytoma. The Lancet 2005;366(9486):665-675.
Van Way 3rd C, Faraci RP, Cleveland HC, Foster JF, Scott Jr HW. Hemorrhagic necrosis of pheochromocytoma associated with phentolamine administration. Annals of surgery 1976;184(1):26.
Suzuki T, Kawabe K, Mori C, Ueno A, Asakage H, Koiso K, Akaza H, Niijima T. Pheochromocytoma with remission following phentolamine-induced shock. Urology 1984;23(6):582-584.
Newell KA, Prinz RA, Pickleman J, Braithwaite S, Brooks M, Karson TH, Glisson S. Pheochromocytoma multisystem crisis: a surgical emergency. Archives of Surgery 1988;123(8):956-959.
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Berry, R., Busireddy, K., Chu, L.C. et al. The good, the bad, and the ugly: uncommon CT appearances of pheochromocytoma. Abdom Radiol 47, 1406–1413 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03447-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03447-y