Abstract
Ollier disease and Maffucci syndrome are the commonest enchondromatosis subtypes, arising from non-hereditary mutations in the IDH1 and IDH2 genes, presenting in childhood and being characterised by multiple enchondromas. Maffucci syndrome also includes multiple soft tissue haemangiomas. Aside from developing bony masses, osseous deformity and pathological fracture, ~ 40% of these patients develop secondary central chondrosarcoma, and there is increased risk of non-skeletal malignancies such as gliomas and mesenchymal ovarian tumours. In this review, we outline the molecular genetics, pathology and multimodality imaging features of solitary enchondroma, Ollier disease and Maffucci syndrome, along with their associated skeletal complications, in particular secondary chondrosarcoma. Given the lifelong risk of malignancy, imaging follow-up will also be explored. Metachondromatosis, a rare enchondromatosis subtype characterised by enchondromas and exostoses, will also be briefly outlined.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Solitary enchondromas are benign central chondrogenic neoplasms exhibiting hyaline cartilaginous differentiation with a predilection for the metadiaphysial regions of the short and long tubular bones of the hands, feet and limbs [1, 2]. They are the second commonest benign chondrogenic tumours following osteochondroma, representing 3–17% of all primary bone tumours in a large biopsy series [2,3,4,5]. The true prevalence of enchondromas is likely underestimated, as these lesions tend to be asymptomatic and present as incidental findings in the 3rd–4th decades of life with no gender predilection [2]. The true rate of malignant transformation of solitary enchondroma to secondary central chondrosarcoma (CS) is unknown but has been estimated at 4.2% [6, 7]. Conversely, malignant transformation occurs in ~ 40% of patients with enchondromatosis syndromes [1, 2], and such patients are on average 10–15 years younger than those with primary CS [8]. Ollier and Maffucci syndrome are the commonest enchondromatosis subtypes and will be explored in detail in this article, along with an overview of metachondromatosis. The remaining enchondromatosis syndromes are extremely rare and beyond the scope of this review.
Molecular genetics
Superti-Furga et al. suggested that enchondromatosis syndromes could be classified according to their underlying molecular defects [9]. Both Ollier disease and Maffucci syndrome are mosaic disorders caused by non-hereditary mutations in IDH1 and IDH2, resulting in a mosaic phenotype. Mutations in these genes are present in ~ 85% of enchondromas. Different non-synonymous single nucleotide variant mutations have also been described, including IDH1 p.R132C, IDH1 p.R132H, IDH1 p.R132G and very rarely IDH2 p.R172S. In patients with Maffucci syndrome, only the IDH1 p.R132C genotype is present [10].
Analysis of the genomics of different tumours from the same patient demonstrates that identical mutations are present in 95% of cases, and the same mutations can also be seen in normal tissues (e.g. blood), indicating somatic mosaicism (a somatic mutation acquired early in development, i.e. post-zygotic, leading to a mosaic phenotype) [11]. Thus, these alterations are acquired early in development, rather than representing inherited germline mutations. At the molecular level, mutations in IDH1/2 result in intra-cellular accumulation of D-2-hydroxyglutarate, an oncometabolite, which then acts as an inhibitor of α-KG dependent dioxygenases, involved in DNA and histone demethylation [12]. Other somatic mutations, in addition to those in IDH1/2, have been seen in chondrosarcoma, including COL21A1, TP53, RB1 and genes involved in the Sonic Hedgehog signalling pathway [13].
Other forms of enchondromatosis are described and associated with germline (as opposed to post-zygotic somatic mutations in the case of IDH1 and IDH2) mutations in other genes, for example metachondromatosis (PTPN11 mutations) [14].
Interestingly, 50% of primary central atypical cartilaginous tumours (ACT)/central chondrosarcoma grade I (Gd I CS), and 50% of grades II and III CS share the same mutations in IDH1 and IDH2 [15], which suggests progression from enchondroma and ACT/Gd I CS to higher grade disease [15].
In Maffucci syndrome, 70% of spindle cell haemangiomas are associated with mutations in IDH1 and more rarely IDH2, a finding not identified in other benign vascular neoplasms [16]. These are benign vascular tumours with a propensity for local recurrence, characterised by ectatic vascular spaces lined by bland endothelial cells with an associated spindle cell component. The spindle cells are slender and tapering, and epithelioid areas may also be identified. This histological feature may assist in the important distinction from Kaposi sarcoma. Additionally, there is no significant cytological atypia [16].
Histopathological features
The histopathological features of both enchondroma and central ACT/central Gd I CS, chondrosarcoma grades II and III are similar to those arising in non-syndromic individuals, but with some important differences as outlined below.
Enchondroma
Enchondromas are hypocellular and composed of oval chondrocytes with a closed chromatin pattern embedded in a hyaline matrix, and host bone permeation is not identified. Enchondromas occurring in the syndromic setting of Ollier disease and Maffucci syndrome often have a higher degree of cellularity than those seen in sporadic tumours, and taken in isolation, this feature cannot be used to make a definitive diagnosis of ACT/Gd I CS. For this, other factors such as the presence of host bone permeation (characterised by host lamellar bone surrounded by tumour with features of tumour-induced osteolysis and formation of Howship’s lacunae), destruction of the bony cortex and extra-osseous extension are required. Correlation with the radiological impression is also important in making this often challenging distinction.
Central ACT/grade I chondrosarcoma and high-grade chondrosarcoma
Central ACT/Gd I CS is associated with a higher degree of cellularity than that seen in enchondroma [15]. There is also more cytological atypia, and importantly, host bone permeation and destruction are present. Significantly, central ACT is regarded as an intermediate grade locally aggressive chondrogenic tumour, rather than a sarcoma in the WHO 2020 classification [17].
CS grade II is associated with a higher degree of cellularity, spindling of the chondrocytes, an open chromatin pattern and conspicuous nucleoli, and the matrix is more myxoid in quality. Chondrosarcoma grade III has an even higher degree of cellularity and cytological atypia, and mitoses are increasingly conspicuous (> 2/10HPF). Dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma is a high-grade subtype of chondrosarcoma, which has a bi-morphic histologic appearance with a conventional chondrosarcomatous component and an abrupt transition to a high-grade, non-cartilaginous sarcoma [17].
Ollier disease
Ollier disease is the commonest enchondromatosis subtype, with an estimated prevalence of 1:100,000 (18), and affects both sexes equally [1]. Some authors make a distinction between Ollier disease and enchondromatosis on the basis of distribution of enchondromas. Ollier disease is defined by multiple (3 or more) asymmetrically distributed enchondromas either exclusively or predominantly involving one side of the body [19], although bilateral, asymmetrically distributed disease also occurs [9, 18, 20]. The term ‘enchondromatosis’ has also been used to describe more symmetric distribution of enchondromas. For the purpose of this review, Ollier disease and enchondromatosis are used interchangeably. The tubular long bones are most commonly involved, namely the femur, tibia, humerus and fibula, which are typically shortened and deformed [20]. The small tubular bones of the hands and feet and the flat bones of the pelvis may also be involved. Involvement of the ribs [21], spine and skull is rare but possible [9].
Patients with Ollier disease present in childhood, with the number and size of enchondromas increasing until skeletal maturity [22, 23]. Patients can present with pathological fracture, palpable painless bony masses, osseous deformity such as asymmetric upper or lower limb shortening and asymmetric/varying finger lengths, joint malalignment and reduced joint mobility [18, 22]. Growth arrest, deformity and angulation occur in the upper and lower limbs, which may require surgery [24]. Initial diagnosis can also be made on imaging as an incidental finding [24].
Approximately 30–40% of cases undergo sarcomatous transformation to CS [1, 20], this occurring in adulthood and most frequently in the long tubular and flat bones. In addition, multifocal malignant transformation has been reported in both Ollier disease and Maffucci syndrome [8, 20]. Patients with Ollier disease are at further risk of non-skeletal malignant lesions such as gliomas and ovarian mesenchymal tumours, while non-small cell lung cancer and leukaemia have also been described [1, 25].
Maffucci syndrome
Maffucci syndrome is an extremely rare disease, fewer than 200 cases having been reported worldwide [26]. It is usually diagnosed in the first decade of life and often at birth [27]. It is characterised by the presence of multiple enchondromas combined with multiple haemangiomas which are most commonly of a spindle cell type, these having malignant potential to transform into secondary CS and angiosarcoma, respectively [27,28,29]. The haemangiomas are usually found in the upper extremity (particularly the hands), followed by the lower extremity and axial skeleton [30]. These appear as areas of bluish discolouration which blanch on pressure [31]. Vascular anomalies have also been described in the meninges, tongue, oral mucosa and visceral organs [30].
Maffucci syndrome has a higher reported risk of malignant transformation than Ollier disease [20, 32, 33], although one recent study found no difference [30]. The average age for neoplastic change from enchondroma to CS in Maffucci syndrome is 40 years [34], while a further study found the average age at first surgery for CS in Maffucci syndrome was 30 years [20]. Similar to Ollier disease, patients with Maffucci syndrome are susceptible to the development of extra-skeletal malignant lesions such as gliomas, astrocytomas, mesenchymal ovarian tumours, cholangiocarcinoma, pancreatic adenocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma [10, 20, 26, 30]. Intracranial lesions occur in 5–10% of patients with Ollier disease and Maffucci syndrome, which includes skull base CS, glial tumours and various non-sarcomatous lesions [35, 36].
Verdegaal et al. [17] and El Abiad et al. [27] found that unlike in Ollier disease, enchondromas were bilateral in Maffucci syndrome. For both Ollier disease and Maffucci syndrome, Verdegaal et al. also identified 3 patterns of distribution of enchondromas. In group I (18%), only the hands and/or feet were affected. In group II (40%), enchondromas were located in the long tubular bones and/or the flat bones. In group III (42%), both the long and flat bones, as well as the small tubular bones of the hands and/or feet, were involved [20].
Ollier and Maffuci syndrome are diagnosed based on clinical, radiological and histological evaluation [20]. El Abiad et al. [27] and Ahmed et al. [34] recommended whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI)/magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) at the time of diagnosis to assess for chondral lesions and vascular anomalies in visceral organs. They also advocated gene sequencing at the time of diagnosis.
As yet, there is no specific curative treatment available for these syndromes. Surgical therapy is available when complications occur such as pathological fracture, growth defects/deformities or malignant transformation [20]. Leg lengthening procedures can be performed for leg length discrepancy, while osteotomy and debulking surgery or amputation can be performed to correct disabling enlargement of the fingers and toes [20]. Disease-related mortality rate for Ollier disease and Maffucci syndrome was found to be 6.8% in a study of 161 patients, the majority of deaths being due to CS and related complications, while a small number of deaths were due to other malignancies [20].
Imaging features
Solitary enchondroma
The radiographic appearance of enchondromas is variable depending upon the location and extent of calcification [38]. Radiographs of enchondromas in the small bones of the hands and feet demonstrate a well-demarcated lobular lytic lesion typically centrally located in the metaphysis and diaphysis [2, 18]. There is usually associated endosteal scalloping, which can be quite deep and extensive in this region [2]. A chondroid matrix with ring and arc, flocculent or stippled calcification can be difficult to appreciate in enchondromas of the hands and feet. Cortical expansion and thickening may be present, but cortical disruption and periosteal reaction should not be seen unless there is an associated pathological fracture [2]. Enchondromas of the long tubular bones tend to be centrally or eccentrically located, well-defined lytic lesions in the metaphysis or diaphysis, measuring < 5 cm longitudinally [2, 39]. There is associated evenly distributed chondroid matrix calcification [2, 25, 38, 40], and shallow endosteal scalloping (< 1/3 cortical thickness and along < 1/3 of the lesion extent) with minor cortical thickening may be demonstrated [2, 39].
There have been reports of solitary enchondroma in the pubic rami [41, 42], which appear purely lytic with slight fusiform expansion of the bone, thinning of the cortex, and a well-defined zone of transition without a sclerotic margin [41]. Calcification, soft tissue mass and cortical destruction should not be present, and lesions should measure no more than 3–5 cm in size [2, 40, 41, 43].
Enchondromas in Ollier disease and Maffucci syndrome
In Ollier disease and Maffucci syndrome, enchondromas are initially located close to the growth plate cartilage and migrate progressively towards the metaphysis or diaphysis with skeletal growth (Fig. 1). The epiphyseal region adjacent to the affected metaphysis may demonstrate irregularities [18]. However, 10% of enchondromas may be located within the epiphysis. Surface lesions known as periosteal chondromas can also occur in enchondromatosis syndromes [44, 45], these being eccentric and sub-periosteal with distinct cortical defects (Fig. 2) [38].
Radiographs typically demonstrate multiple linear or pillar-shaped radiolucent, homogeneous oval or elongated lesions with a thin rim of radiodense bone. These run parallel to the long axis of the bone from the metaphysis to diaphysis, are most typically seen in the skeletally immature and are common in Ollier disease and Maffucci syndrome (Figs. 3 and 4) [18, 46,47,48]. With time, these lesions demonstrate stippled or punctate calcification. Enchondromas are frequently assembled as clusters resulting in asymmetric enlargement and flaring of the metaphysis (Fig. 5) [18, 49]. Bone erosion and/or hypertrophy of the cortical surface can be observed (Fig. 2a) [48]. Enchondromas result in severe growth abnormalities, with the affected diaphysis being short, enlarged and possibly demonstrating bending close to the metaphysis (Figs. 5a and 6) [18], and pathological fracture may occur. Despite reports of enchondromas occurring in the flat bones of patients with enchondromatosis (Figs. 5b and 7), the imaging appearances are not well-described.
Radiographs of the hands and feet are often pathognomonic and demonstrate multiple well-demarcated radiolucent lesions with expansile remodelling of the affected bone, thinning of the cortex and endosteal scalloping (Figs. 1 and 2). Chondroid matrix mineralisation may be present [34], while patients with Maffucci syndrome may demonstrate multiple small round calcifications in the soft tissues due to phleboliths within vascular malformations (Fig. 8) [27, 31, 34].
Computed tomography (CT) is superior to radiography in detecting matrix mineralisation, the pattern of calcification and lesion margins [35]. CT is especially helpful in assessing suspected enchondromas in complex areas of anatomy such as the pelvis [2, 25]. CT can better assess the extent of endosteal scalloping [2], the presence of an associated soft tissue mass and complications such as pathological fracture with associated haematoma, or secondary CS [38]. Multiplanar reconstructed CT can be used for surgical planning in patients with enchondromatosis syndromes.
On MRI, enchondromas appear as lobular chondral islands of variable size surrounded by marrow fat. The cartilage islands are of low-to-intermediate signal intensity (SI) on T1-weighted (T1W) sequences (Figs. 1b, 2b, 3c and 7b) and hyperintense on T2W and fat suppressed T2W or short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences (Figs. 1c, 3d, 4b, c and 7c). Foci of hyperintense T1W SI representing marrow fat are typically demonstrated within and around the cartilage islands [2, 50], while intra-lesional hypointense linear SI may be demonstrated on T2W images representing fibrous septa [39]. Focal areas of hypointense SI on T1W and T2W sequences may also be seen, representing chondroid matrix mineralisation [2]. Following contrast, peripheral and septal enhancement may be demonstrated [39, 51, 52].
Enchondromas can demonstrate radiotracer uptake on bone scintigraphy which is typically homogenous and mild compared to the physiologic uptake in the anterior iliac crest [2, 53]. However, children can have active lesions that show more intense uptake [37].
Imaging features suggesting malignant transformation
Malignant transformation of enchondroma in Ollier disease and Maffucci syndrome should be suspected clinically if any osseous lesion demonstrates growth after skeletal maturity [2], particularly if associated with pain [14]. Malignant transformation of enchondroma is more common in the long tubular bones and flat bones than in the hands and feet, with a risk of 44–50% and 14%, respectively. [20]. In addition, the diagnostic threshold for CS in the hands and feet is higher than that of CS elsewhere in the body [54]. A recent study found that high-grade CS was more likely to occur in tumours arising from the pelvis in enchondromatosis syndromes [33]. Previously reported radiographic features suggestive of the development of CS in enchondromatosis syndromes include cortical destruction and the presence of a soft tissue mass (Fig. 9a) [20]. However, the inherent skeletal deformities in Ollier disease and Maffucci syndrome make assessment of suspicious or aggressive radiographic features challenging [27].
General radiographic features suggestive of ACT in the long bones include larger size (> 5 cm), deep endosteal scalloping, cortical remodelling, cortical thickening and periosteal reaction [39, 51, 52, 55, 56]. On CT and MRI, the presence of deep and extensive endosteal scalloping involving > 2/3 of the cortical thickness and tumour length, cortical remodelling and thickening, periosteal reaction and peri-tumoural soft tissue oedema are more frequently observed in ACT (Fig. 9) [51, 52, 55, 57]. A recent study found endosteal scalloping was more significantly associated with grade I CS than enchondroma in the pelvis, and calcification, soft tissue mass and cortical disruption were only found in grade I CS [43].
Radiographic features suggestive of high-grade CS (grades II and III) include permeative bone destruction, bone expansion, cortical destruction and aggressive periosteal reaction (Fig. 10). Less extensive matrix mineralisation may also be demonstrated [58]. MRI findings in keeping with high-grade CS comprise greater tumour length, cortical thickening, cortical destruction, bone expansion, bone and soft tissue oedema, periosteal reaction and the presence of a soft tissue mass [44, 58,59,60,61]. A recent study found that the presence of bone marrow oedema, periosteal reaction and soft tissue oedema on MRI may indicate high-grade malignant transformation of enchondromas in the long bones in patients with enchondromatosis syndromes (Fig. 10c, d) [33]. However, no specific features could be identified to suggest high-grade CS in the hands or feet (Fig. 11).
Dedifferentiated CS may demonstrate bi-phasic features at radiography and aggressive features such as progressive bone destruction, cortical destruction, reduced bone mineralisation and a large soft tissue mass [58, 62]. CT and MRI may demonstrate bi-phasic tumour morphology with an intermediate-to-low SI T2W non-chondroid component contrasting with the relatively hyperintense chondral tissue, the former often demonstrating uniform enhancement following contrast [62, 63]. However, it should be noted that dedifferentiated CS can have a range of MRI features. The SI of the non-chondroid component will reflect its basic morphology, its vascularity and degree of haemorrhage and necrosis. Combinations of chondrosarcoma and fibroblastic osteosarcoma have been described in Ollier disease [64]. Dedifferentiated CS has also been reported in Mafucci syndrome, the dedifferentiated component in 1 case containing 3 mesenchymal elements, osteosarcoma, fibrosarcoma and malignant fibrous histiocytoma [65].
Bone scintigraphy cannot reliably distinguish between enchondroma and CS; however, it can be used to evaluate the extent of the disease in enchondromatosis syndromes (Fig.10b) [32]. Increased uptake in a lesion may be due to other reasons such as insufficiency fractures [46]. F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (FDG-PET-CT) may be useful in identifying intermediate or high-grade CS at SUVmax values of > 4.5, although at SUVmax values of 2–4.5, it is difficult to differentiate between benign and malignant tumours [66, 67]. FDG-PET-CT can be used to identify regions of greatest SUVmax to guide percutaneous biopsy [68], assess for metastatic disease and identify tumour recurrence at follow-up [6, 69].
In summary, the clinical criteria for malignant transformation are as follows: pain and growth of an enchondroma beyond skeletal maturity. Imaging criteria include cortical destruction, presence of a soft tissue mass, bone expansion, deep endosteal scalloping, less extensive matrix mineralisation and aggressive periosteal reaction on radiography, CT and MRI. In addition, the presence of bone marrow oedema and soft tissue oedema on MRI also suggests malignant transformation.
Metachondromatosis
Metachondromatosis is a rare autosomal dominant disorder with incomplete penetrance caused by mutations in the PTPN11 gene [9, 14], approximately 50 cases having been reported worldwide [70]. It has a prevalence of < 1:1,000,000, is characterised by the presence of enchondromas and exostoses and usually presents in the 1st decade of life [71,72,73]. It is distinct from multiple hereditary osteochondromas (MHO) in that the exostoses in metachondromatosis point towards the joint, are mainly located in the hands and feet [1, 9, 70] and have a predominantly fibrous cap with a core of disorganised cartilage surrounded by trabecular bone [14]. In addition, metachondromatosis is not linked to the EXT1 and EXT2 genes responsible for MHO (14). Exostoses can arise from the metaphysis or epiphysis and are typically located in the phalanges and metacarpals of the hands (Figs. 12a–c), although exostoses have also been reported in the femur, tibia (Figs. 12d–f), fibula, anterior aspects of the vertebral bodies and scapular blades [70]. There may be associated peri-articular soft tissue calcification (Figs.12g, h) [70].
Enchondromas typically involve the iliac crests and long bone metaphyses of the lower extremities [1], other reported locations including the proximal humerus, distal radius and small bones of the hands and feet [74,75,76]. There has been one reported case of metachondromatosis occurring without enchondromas, suggesting multiple and variable phenotypes of the condition [74]. On radiographs, metaphyseal enchondromas can appear striated, while along the iliac crest and superior femoral neck, they can be punched-out or lacunar-like [70, 77]. Lesions are reportedly not associated with axial deformity or shortening of affected bones [70, 78]. However, they can result in secondary reduced range of motion [79], and deformity of the small joints of the hands, such as hyperextension, subluxation or valgus deformity, which may persist even after regression of an exostosis [70]. Peri-articular soft tissue calcifications are often present and are due to peripheral enchondral ossification of epiphysis-based exophytic enchondromas [70, 75].
A diagnosis of metachondromatosis is based on clinical signs, radiographic findings and familial history. If a molecular diagnosis is confirmed, this can be used to aid diagnosis in other family members [71, 72]. The clinical course of metachondromatosis is unpredictable, with simultaneous growth of some lesions and regression of others [71, 73]. Metachondromatosis is thought to spontaneously regress during childhood, although some lesions persist into adulthood [70, 78]. Similar to other enchondromatoses, new lesions do not appear after skeletal maturation [70]. However, unlike other enchondromatosis syndromes, metachondromatosis has low malignant potential, only 2 cases of secondary CS having been reported in the literature, both of which had arisen from an enchondroma [72, 80]. Complications include nerve compression, femoral head avascular necrosis, necrosis of overlying skin and pathological fracture [70, 75, 76]. Avascular necrosis of the femoral head is a particularly frequent complication and is thought to be caused by exostoses or enchondromas in the femoral neck interfering with the integrity of the lateral epiphyseal vessels [81]. Management of metachondromatosis depends upon clinical presentation, with surgical excision of exostoses advocated for symptomatic patients [79].
Follow-up of patients with enchondromatosis syndromes
Given the significant increased risk of malignant transformation in certain enchondromatosis syndromes and various other CNS and soft tissue malignancies, follow-up of such patients must be performed. However, there is currently no agreed consensus or standard protocol. Several studies and literature reviews have advocated annual physical examination [6, 23, 30], with varied imaging follow-up techniques and intervals. Verdegaal et al. advocate screening radiographs for patients with enchondromas in the long and/or flat bones when complaints of pain, swelling or neurological disorders arise or increase [20]. El Abiad et al. recommend plain radiography of known enchondromas measuring < 5 cm every 2–3 years [30], while Lin et al. recommend skeletal surveys every 1–2 years with localised radiographs of symptomatic areas. However, radiography is limited in certain anatomical areas and the frequency of skeletal surveys must be weighed against the risk of cumulative radiation exposure [82]. Herget et al. advise annual MRI of affected areas or WB-MRI for patients with chondral tumours that measure > 5–6 cm in size (Fig. 13), or those located in the pelvis, femur, humerus or scapula [8].
Due to the increased risk of gliomas and skull base CS in Ollier disease and Maffucci syndrome, regular cranial MRI at annual or 3-yearly intervals has been recommended, although one study advocated head CT in symptomatic patients [20, 36, 83]. In patients with Maffucci syndrome, abdominal CT in symptomatic patients or annual abdominal ultrasound has been recommended, with further investigation in the form of CT or MRI should any abnormality be detected [20, 23].
Follow-up with annual or biennial WB-MRI has been suggested by several authors [26, 30, 83, 84]. One study used the following protocol: coronal and axial STIR sequences, along with a coronal T1-weighted sequence [84]. The benefits of WB-MRI include the ability to monitor the size of enchondromas, detect soft tissue lesions and extra-skeletal malignancy (Fig. 14) and the avoidance of multiple exposures to ionising radiation over the course of a lifetime [83]. However, it may be difficult to diagnose changes in the hands and feet with WB-MRI, and WB-MRI is also relatively time consuming and expensive [84]. Where WB-MRI is not available, bone scintigraphy is recommended as an alternative, while CT may be helpful in anatomically difficult regions such as the scapula or pelvis [30].
Due to the rarity of metachondromatosis, it is difficult to establish formal monitoring recommendations. Mavrogenis et al. advised monitoring and follow-up in patients with large, growing long bone exostoses due to the risk of neural and vascular compression, and in patients with femoral head involvement due to the risk of avascular necrosis [75].
Taking into account the various recommendations in the literature, for patients with Ollier disease and Maffucci syndrome, we advise annual clinical examination and WB-MRI from the age of 25 years considering that El Abiad et al. identified the median age at cancer diagnosis was 25 years in Ollier disease and 30 years in Maffucci syndrome [30]. While this is costly, particularly WB-MRI, this is offset by the rarity of these disorders and the significant lifetime risk of multi-centric CS occurring in a metachronous pattern. For patients with metachondromatosis, we advocate biennial or triennial clinical review, which can be adjusted depending upon the patient’s clinical status [70, 73, 75].
Conclusions
Ollier disease and Maffucci syndrome are the commonest of the enchondromatosis syndromes, characterised by multiple enchondromas in the small tubular bones of the hands and feet, the long tubular bones and flat bones. Patients typically develop deformities in the hands, feet and lower limbs and are at significant risk of secondary CS and non-skeletal malignancies. Multimodality imaging of such patients aids diagnosis, can allow for pre-operative planning and can identify malignant transformation. Clinical and imaging follow-up is necessary in these patients, although as yet there is no agreed national or international consensus on protocol.
References
Pansuriya TC, Kroon HM, Bovée JVMG. Enchondromatosis: insights on the different subtypes. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2010;3(6):557–69.
Flemming DJ, Murphey MD. Enchondroma and chondrosarcoma. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2000;4(1):59–71.
Mulder JD, editor. Radiologic atlas of bone tumors. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1993. 749 p
Mirra JM, Picci P, Gold RH. Bone tumors: clinical, radiologic, and pathologic correlations. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1989. p. 2.
Dahlin DC, Unni KK, Inwards CY. Bone tumors: general aspects and data on 10,165 cases. Philadelphia: Wollters Kluwer / Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010.
Herget GW, Strohm P, Rottenburger C, Kontny U, Krauß T, Bohm J, et al. Insights into enchondroma, enchondromatosis and the risk of secondary chondrosarcoma. Review of the literature with an emphasis on the clinical behaviour, radiology, malignant transformation and the follow up. Neoplasma. 2014;61(4):365–78.
Altay M, Bayrakci K, Yildiz Y, Erekul S, Saglik Y. Secondary chondrosarcoma in cartilage bone tumors: report of 32 patients. J Orthop Sci. 2007;12(5):415–23.
Herget GW, Uhl M, Opitz OG, Adler CP, Südkamp NP, Knöller S. The many faces of chondrosarcoma of bone, own cases and review of the literature with an emphasis on radiology, pathology and treatment. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2011;78(6):501–9.
Superti-Furga A, Spranger J, Nishimura G. Enchondromatosis revisited: new classification with molecular basis. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2012;160C(3):154–64.
Pansuriya TC, van Eijk R, d’Adamo P, van Ruler MAJH, Kuijjer ML, Oosting J, et al. Somatic mosaic IDH1 and IDH2 mutations are associated with enchondroma and spindle cell hemangioma in Ollier disease and Maffucci syndrome. Nat Genet. 2011;43(12):1256–61.
Amary MF, Damato S, Halai D, Eskandarpour M, Berisha F, Bonar F, et al. Ollier disease and Maffucci syndrome are caused by somatic mosaic mutations of IDH1 and IDH2. Nat Genet. 2011;43(12):1262–5.
Amary MF, Bacsi K, Maggiani F, Damato S, Halai D, Berisha F, et al. IDH1 and IDH2 mutations are frequent events in central chondrosarcoma and central and periosteal chondromas but not in other mesenchymal tumours. J Pathol. 2011;224(3):334–43.
Tarpey PS, Behjati S, Cooke SL, Van Loo P, Wedge DC, Pillay N, et al. Frequent mutation of the major cartilage collagen gene COL2A1 in chondrosarcoma. Nat Genet. 2013;45(8):923–6.
Bowen ME, Boyden ED, Holm IA, Campos-Xavier B, Bonafé L, Superti-Furga A, et al. Loss-of-function mutations in PTPN11 cause metachondromatosis, but not Ollier disease or Maffucci syndrome. Wilkie AOM, editor. PLoS Genet. 2011;14;7(4):e1002050.
Choi JH, Ro JY. The 2020 WHO classification of tumors of bone: an updated review. Adv Anat Pathol. 2021;28(3):119–38.
Kurek KC, Pansuriya TC, van Ruler MAJH, van den Akker B, Luks VL, Verbeke SLJ, et al. R132C IDH1 mutations are found in spindle cell hemangiomas and not in other vascular tumors or malformations. Am J Pathol. 2013;182(5):1494–500.
The WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. WHO classification of tumours soft tissue and bone tumours. 5th ed. Lyon: IARC Press; 2020.
Silve C, Jüppner H. Ollier disease. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2006;1(1):37.
Goto T, Motoi T, Komiya K, Motoi N, Okuma T, Okazaki H, et al. Chondrosarcoma of the hand secondary to multiple enchondromatosis; report of two cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2003;123(1):42–7.
Verdegaal SHM, Bovée JVMG, Pansuriya TC, Grimer RJ, Ozger H, Jutte PC, et al. Incidence, predictive factors, and prognosis of chondrosarcoma in patients with Ollier disease and Maffucci syndrome: an international multicenter study of 161 patients. Oncologist. 2011;16(12):1771–9.
Candas F, Yildizhan A, Gorur R. Different appearance of Ollier disease: enchondromatosis of the ribs. ANZ J Surg. 2017;87(12):E305–6.
Jurik AG. Multiple hereditary exostoses and enchondromatosis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2020 Jun;34(3):101505.
Ghatan A, Scharschmidt T, Conrad E. Extreme enchondromatosis: a report of two cases and review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(13):2336–43.
Kadar A, Kleinstern G, Morsy M, Soreide E, Moran SL. Multiple enchondromas of the hand in children: long-term follow-up of mean 15.4 years. J Pediatr Orthop. 2018;38(10):543–8.
Kumar A, Jain VK, Bharadwaj M, Arya RK. Ollier disease: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Orthopedics. 2015;38(6):e497-506.
Prokopchuk O, Andres S, Becker K, Holzapfel K, Hartmann D, Friess H. Maffucci syndrome and neoplasms: a case report and review of the literature. BMC Res Notes. 2016;27(9):126.
Foreman KL, Kransdorf MJ, O’Connor MI, Krishna M. AIRP best cases in radiologic-pathologic correlation: Maffucci syndrome. Radiographics. 2013;33(3):861–8.
Fukunaga M, Suzuki K, Saegusa N, Folpe AL. Composite hemangioendothelioma: report of 5 cases including one with associated Maffucci syndrome. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31(10):1567–72.
Lissa FCT, Argente JS, Antunes GN, Basso F de O, Furtado J. Maffucci syndrome and soft tissue sarcoma: a case report. Int Semin Surg Oncol. 2009 Dec;6(1):2.
El Abiad JM, Robbins SM, Cohen B, Levin AS, Valle DL, Morris CD, et al. Natural history of Ollier disease and Maffucci syndrome: patient survey and review of clinical literature. Am J Med Genet A. 2020;182(5):1093–103.
Casal D, Mavioso C, Mendes M-M, Mouzinho M-M. Hand involvement in Ollier disease and Maffucci syndrome: a case series. Acta Reumatol Port. 2010;35(3):375–8.
Lee SM, Lee JJ, Kim YK, Lee JW, Chung J-H, Kim SE. Bone scintigraphy findings of a case with Maffucci’s syndrome. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;44(2):150–3.
Sharif B, Rajakulasingam R, Sharifi S, O’Donnell P, Saifuddin A. MRI features of low-grade and high-grade chondrosarcoma in enchondromatosis. Skeletal Radiol. 2021;50:1637–1646
Zwenneke Flach H, Ginai AZ, Wolter OJ. Best cases from the AFIP: Maffucci syndrome: radiologic and pathologic findings. Radiographics. 2001;21(5):1311–6.
Ranger A, Szymczak A. Do intracranial neoplasms differ in ollier disease and maffucci syndrome? An in-depth analysis of the literature. Neurosurgery. 2009;65(6):1106–15.
Mandonnet E, Anract P, Martin E, Roujeau T, Spena G, Cormier-Daire V, et al. Brain and skull base MRI findings in patients with Ollier-Maffucci disease: a series of 12 patient-cases. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2017;160:147–51.
Ahmed SK, Lee WC, Irving RM, Walsh AR. Is Ollier’s disease an understaging of Maffucci’s syndrome? J Laryngol Otol. 1999;113(9):861–4.
Biondi NL, Varacallo M. Enchondroma. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020 [cited 2021 Feb 7]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK536938/. Accessed 7 Feb 2021.
Murphey MD, Flemming DJ, Boyea SR, Bojescul JA, Sweet DE, Temple HT. Enchondroma versus chondrosarcoma in the appendicular skeleton: differentiating features. Radiographics. 1998;18(5):1213–37.
Mulligan ME. How to diagnose enchondroma, bone infarct, and chondrosarcoma. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2019;48(3):262–73.
Buirski G, Ratliff AHC, Watt I. Cartilage-cell-containing tumours of the pelvis: a radiological review of 40 patients. Br J Radiol. 1986;59(699):197–204.
Onuoha KM, Idowu BS, Orimolade EA, Makinde ON. Pelvic enchondroma: a rare location and cause of dyspareunia and infertility. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2016;15(10):91–3.
Alfaro PA, Ciani G, Herrera CA, Donati DM, Errani C. Differential diagnosis and treatment of enchondromas and atypical cartilaginous tumours of the pelvis: analysis of 21 patients. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020;30(1):25–30.
Sharif B, Lindsay D, Saifuddin A. The role of imaging in differentiating low-grade and high-grade central chondral tumours. Eur J Radiol. 2021;137:109579.
Yang KY, Sung MS, Lee HJ, Park IJ, Lee JY, Yu WJ, et al. MR features of multiple enchondromas with associated chondrosarcoma in the lower extremities. J Korean Soc Radiol. 2016;74(2):137.
Fallahi B, Bostani M, Gilani KA, Beiki D, Gholamrezanezhad A. Manifestations of Ollier’s disease in a 21-year-old man: a case report. J Med Case Reports. 2009;28(3):7759.
Suster D, Hung YP, Nielsen GP. Differential diagnosis of cartilaginous lesions of bone. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2020;144(1):71–82.
Park Y-K. Multiple Enchondromatosis (Ollier’s Disease). In: Santini-Araujo E, Kalil RK, Bertoni F, Park Y-K, editors. Tumors and tumor-like lesions of bone [Internet]. London: Springer London; 2015 [cited 2021 Feb 9]. p. 253–8. Available from: http://springerlink.bibliotecabuap.elogim.com/10.1007/978-1-4471-6578-1_17. Accessed 9 Feb 2021
Muthusamy S, Conway SA, Temple HT. Five polyostotic conditions that general orthopedic surgeons should recognize (or should not miss). Orthop Clin North Am. 2014;45(3):417–29.
Vanel D, Kreshak J, Larousserie F, Alberghini M, Mirra J, De Paolis M, et al. Enchondroma vs. chondrosarcoma: a simple, easy-to-use, new magnetic resonance sign. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82(12):2154–60.
Crim J, Schmidt R, Layfield L, Hanrahan C, Manaster BJ. Can imaging criteria distinguish enchondroma from grade 1 chondrosarcoma? Eur J Radiol. 2015;84(11):2222–30.
Douis H, Parry M, Vaiyapuri S, Davies AM. What are the differentiating clinical and MRI-features of enchondromas from low-grade chondrosarcomas? Eur Radiol. 2018;28(1):398–409.
Ferrer-Santacreu EM, Ortiz-Cruz EJ, Díaz-Almirón M, Pozo Kreilinger JJ. Enchondroma versus chondrosarcoma in long bones of appendicular skeleton: clinical and radiological criteria—a follow-up. J Oncol. 2016;2016:1–10.
Fayad LM, Ahlawat S, Khan MS, McCarthy E. Chondrosarcomas of the hands and feet: a case series and systematic review of the literature. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84(10):2004–12.
De Coninck T, Jans L, Sys G, Huysse W, Verstraeten T, Forsyth R, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for differentiation between enchondroma and chondrosarcoma. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(11):3140–52.
Geirnaerdt MJ, Hermans J, Bloem JL, Kroon HM, Pope TL, Taminiau AH, et al. Usefulness of radiography in differentiating enchondroma from central grade 1 chondrosarcoma. Am J Roentgenol. 1997;169(4):1097–104.
Choi B-B, Jee W-H, Sunwoo H-J, Cho J-H, Kim J-Y, Chun K-A, et al. MR differentiation of low-grade chondrosarcoma from enchondroma. Clin Imaging. 2013;37(3):542–7.
Murphey MD, Walker EA, Wilson AJ, Kransdorf MJ, Temple HT, Gannon FH. From the archives of the AFIP: imaging of primary chondrosarcoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2003;23(5):1245–78.
Yoo HJ, Hong SH, Choi J-Y, Moon KC, Kim H-S, Choi J-A, et al. Differentiating high-grade from low-grade chondrosarcoma with MR imaging. Eur Radiol. 2009;19(12):3008–14.
Deckers C, Steyvers MJ, Hannink G, Schreuder HWB, de Rooy JWJ, Van Der Geest ICM. Can MRI differentiate between atypical cartilaginous tumors and high-grade chondrosarcoma? A systematic review Acta Orthop. 2020;91(4):471–8.
Douis H, Singh L, Saifuddin A. MRI differentiation of low-grade from high-grade appendicular chondrosarcoma. Eur Radiol. 2014;24(1):232–40.
Littrell LA, Wenger DE, Wold LE, Bertoni F, Unni KK, White LM, et al. Radiographic, CT, and MR imaging features of dedifferentiated chondrosarcomas: a retrospective review of 174 de novo cases. Radiographics. 2004;24(5):1397–409.
Saifuddin A, Mann BS, Mahroof S, Pringle JAS, Briggs TWR, Cannon SR. Dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma: use of MRI to guide needle biopsy. Clin Radiol. 2004;59(3):268–72.
Liu J, Hudkins PG, Swee RG, Unni KK. Bone sarcomas associated with Ollier’s disease. Cancer. 1987;59(7):1376–85.
Tsuchiya H, Tomita K, Yasutake H, Takagi Y, Ueda Y, Kadoya M. Maffucci’s syndrome combined with dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1991;110(5):269–72.
Subhawong TK, Jacobs MA, Fayad LM. Insights into quantitative diffusion-weighted MRI for musculoskeletal tumor imaging. Am J Roentgenol. 2014;203(3):560–72.
Makis W, Hickeson M, Lisbona R. Maffucci syndrome with extraosseous chondrosarcoma imaged with F-18 FDG PET-CT. Clin Nucl Med. 2010;35(1):29–31.
Jo I, Gould D, Schlicht S, Taubman K, Choong P. Diagnostic accuracy of functional imaging modalities for chondrosarcoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Oncol. 2019;19:100262.
Johnson JD, Rainer WG, Rose PS, Houdek MT. Utility of bone scintigraphy and PET-CT in the surgical staging of skeletal chondrosarcoma. Anticancer Res. 2020;40(10):5735–8.
Fisher TJ, Williams N, Morris L, Cundy PJ. Metachondromatosis: more than just multiple osteochondromas. J Child Orthop. 2013;7(6):455–64.
McFarlane J, Knight T, Sinha A, Cole T, Kiely N, Freeman R. Exostoses, enchondromatosis and metachondromatosis; diagnosis and management. Acta Orthop Belg. 2016;82(1):102–5.
Jamshidi K, Shooshtarizadeh T, Bahrabadi M. Chondrosarcoma in metachondromatosis: a rare case report. Acta Med Iran. 2017;55(12):793–9.
Bovée JV. Multiple osteochondromas. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2008;3(1):3.
Kanaya K, Ishikawa A, Yaoita M, Niihori T, Aoki Y, Iba K, et al. Metachondromatosis without enchondromas: a case report and review of the literature. JBJS Case Connect. 2016;6(2):e30.
Mavrogenis AF, Skarpidi E, Papakonstantinou O, Papagelopoulos PJ. Chondrosarcoma in metachondromatosis: a case report. J Bone Jt Surg-Am. 2010;92(6):1507–13.
Banks RJ. Pathological fractures; a consideration with metachondromatosis and differential diagnoses. Osteochondromatosis and Gauchers disease. Australas Chiropr Osteopat J Chiropr Osteopath Coll Australas. 2002;10(2):105–10.
Herman TE, Chines A, McAlister WH, Gottesman GS, Eddy MC, Whyte MP. Metachondromatosis: report of a family with facial features mildly resembling trichorhinophalangeal syndrome. Pediatr Radiol. 1997;27(5):436–41.
Pannier S, Legeai-Mallet L. Hereditary multiple exostoses and enchondromatosis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2008;22(1):45–54.
Mansor N, Saisu T, Kakizaki J, Oikawa Y, Kamegaya M. Arthroscopic resection of femoral neck osteochondroma: report of a pediatric case of metachondromatosis. J Orthop Sci. 2019;Sep:S0949265819302593.
Mavrogenis AF, Papaparaskeva KT, Galanakos S, Papagelopoulos PJ. Pigmented villonodular synovitis of the distal tibiofibular joint: a case report. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2011;28(3):589–97.
Wenger DR, Birch J, Rathjen K, Tobin R, Billman G. Metachondromatosis and avascular necrosis of the femoral head: a radiographic and histologic correlation. J Pediatr Orthop. 1991;11(3):294–300.
Lin PP, Moussallem CD, Deavers MT. Secondary chondrosarcoma: Am Acad. Orthop Surg. 2010;18(10):608–15.
McGarry ME. Long term oncologic surveillance in Maffucci syndrome: a case report. J Oncol Sci. 2017;3(3):140–4.
Jurik AG, Jørgensen PH, Mortensen MM. Whole-body MRI in assessing malignant transformation in multiple hereditary exostoses and enchondromatosis: audit results and literature review. Skeletal Radiol. 2020;49(1):115–24.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sharif, B., Lindsay, D. & Saifuddin, A. Update on the imaging features of the enchondromatosis syndromes. Skeletal Radiol 51, 747–762 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-021-03870-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-021-03870-0