Abstract
Whey is a byproduct of dairy industries, the aqueous portion which separates from cheese during the coagulation of milk. It represents approximately 85–95% of milk’s volume and retains much of its nutrients, including functional proteins and peptides, lipids, lactose, minerals, and vitamins. Due to its composition, mainly proteins and lactose, it can be considered a raw material for value-added products. Whey-derived products are often used to supplement food, as they have shown several physiological effects on the body. Whey protein hydrolysates are reported to have different activities, including antihypertensive, antioxidant, antithrombotic, opioid, antimicrobial, cytomodulatory, and immuno-modulatory. On the other hand, galactooligosaccharides obtained from lactose can be used as prebiotic for beneficial microorganisms for the human gastrointestinal tract. All these compounds can be obtained through physicochemical, microbial, or enzymatic treatments. Particularly, enzymatic processes have the advantage of being highly selective, more stable than chemical transformations, and less polluting, making that the global enzyme market grow at accelerated rates. The sources and different products associated with the most used enzymes are particularly highlighted in this review. Moreover, we discuss metagenomics as a tool to identify novel proteolytic enzymes, from both cultivable and uncultivable microorganisms, which are expected to have new interesting activities. Finally enzymes for the transformation of whey sugar are reviewed. In this sense, carbozymes with ß-galactosidase activity are capable of lactose hydrolysis, to obtain free monomers, and transgalactosylation for prebiotics production.
Key points
• Whey can be used to obtain value-added products efficiently through enzymatic treatments
• Proteases transform whey proteins into biopeptides with physiological activities
• Lactose can be transformed into prebiotic compounds using ß-galactosidases
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Enzymes are proteins involved in accelerating the biochemical reactions which convert substrates into products. Interest in enzymatic processes is increasing because their biocatalysis is highly active, selective, stable, and environmentally friendly. The global enzyme market size was valued at USD 9008.7 million in 2019 and is expected to grow to USD 13,815.2 million in 2027, exhibiting a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.4% in the period 2020–2027 (www.fortunebusinessinsights.com). The growth of the enzyme market size is driven by the wide variety of product applications, from food and beverages to detergents, from diagnostics to renewable biofuels and greener production of tires and adhesives (Singhania et al. 2015).
The commercially available enzymes consist mainly of oxidoreductases, transferases, and hydrolases. Hydrolytic enzymes (EC 3.X) are a type of enzyme that break chemical bonds with water, causing a larger molecule to be divided into smaller molecules. They are commonly used for substrate breakdown, degradation of toxins, but can also be used for synthesis of biopolymers, by transferring moieties to other molecules to form more complex compounds. The principal hydrolytic enzymes with commercial application are lipases, proteases, epoxide hydrolases, and nitrile hydrolases. Just proteases account for about 60% of the entire enzyme market (Hasan et al. 2022), but is expected to experience considerable growth in the next few years (http://marketsandmarkets.com).
One of the areas where enzymatic processes play a key role is whey revalorization. Whey is the main by-product from dairy industries, representing between 85 and 95% of the milk volume used in cheese manufacture and retains around 55% of milk nutrients. It is composed mainly of lactose (4.5–5% w/v), proteins (0.6–0.8% w/v), lipids (0.4–0.5–5% w/v), and mineral salts (8–10% of dried extract) (Zotta et al. 2020). Depending on the casein precipitation method used to coagulate milk, whey can be classified into sweet or sour whey (Zandona et al. 2021). The first one is obtained by treating milk with rennet and has high levels of lactose, fats, and proteins. On the other hand, sour whey is obtained by fermentation or addition acids and contains higher levels of lactic acid, phosphorus, and calcium. Cheese worldwide production is estimated at 22.6 million tons/year, which involves a worldwide whey accumulation around 180–200 million tons/year (Buchanan et al. 2023). Due to its high organic load and high volumes of production, whey poses an environmental risk if it is not properly managed (Zandona et al. 2021). Whey can be used to produce different value-added products: animal feed, whey protein derivatives using membrane technologies, lactose powder via crystallizing, and lactose or protein derivatives by chemical, microbial, or enzymatic processes (Fig. 1). Although 50% of cheese whey is used in food and pharmaceutical formulations, the remaining volume is large enough to be used in other biotechnological processes (Coelho et al. 2021).
In this review, the current state of enzymatic treatments for valorizing whey proteins and lactose from dairy industry by-products is highlighted. We focus on the most common enzymes used for treatments and the characteristics of the products obtained in each case. Since the number of commercial available enzymes and the sources they come from are still limited, we also discuss the potential of metagenomics techniques to identify novel enzymes with desired characteristics and different enzyme engineering techniques as a way to improve known enzymes activity, opening a huge field for future investigations.
Whey protein hydrolysis
Whey is composed of several different proteins. The most abundant are β-lactoglobulin and ɑ-lactalbumin, representing around 50% and 20% of whey proteins, respectively (Buchanan et al. 2023). Other proteins and peptides that can be found, but represent a smaller fraction of whey, are glycomacropeptide, bovine serum albumin, immunoglobulins, lactoferrin, and lactoperoxidase.
Whey protein concentrates (WPC) and isolates (WPI) can be obtained from whey by combining different filtration strategies (Smithers 2008). Nanofiltration (pore size between 0.1 and 1 nm) helps bring the overall mineral content down, while ultrafiltration (~ 0.5 µm pore size) allows to retain between 35 and 80% of whey proteins, depending on the volume concentration factor applied (Kelly 2019). These processes have been the most widely adopted and cost-effective separation process to obtain WPC since the 1970s. The introduction in the 1990s of a pretreatment, involving cross-flow microfiltration aided in the removal of residual lipids in advance, helps to elevate protein concentration to isolate status (≥ 90% of proteins on a dry basis). Other methods, such as industrial chromatography, can be applied to isolate whey proteins, but are considered expensive and are only used when other potentially cheaper options are less successful.
Even though WPC and WPI are commodities with high value in themselves, breaking down these proteins into peptides can be an interesting approach to add value to these products (Brandelli et al. 2015). Whey protein hydrolysates (WPHs) are used as a food supplement with better digestibility, such as whey protein-based formulas for infants intolerant to cow’s milk protein (Sinha et al. 2007) or for accelerating recovery from exercise induced muscle damage (Buckley et al. 2010). Peptides from whey have also shown several physiological effects on the body, like working as antihypertensive, antioxidant, antithrombotic, opioid, antimicrobial, cytomodulatory, immuno-modulatory, among others (Mann et al. 2019).
While bioactive peptides remain inactive when they are part of the original protein sequence, they can be released by chemical processes, using an alkaline or acidic media. This strategy presents several disadvantages: it is more difficult to control the process to obtain specific products or avoid certain unwanted products, like free amino acids and small peptides with two or more nonpolar residues, which have been linked to bitter taste (Linde et al. 2009). Furthermore, chemical processes can generate hydrolysates with modified amino acids (Ulug et al. 2021). A greener alternative is subcritical water hydrolysis (SCW), a method that uses water at a temperature between 100 and 374 °C and a pressure less than 22 MPa for adopting properties of other no polar solvents such as hexane. This technique is used for bioactive compound extractions from food and for hydrolysis of biopolymers and proteins (Rivas-Vela et al. 2021). Another example of physical hydrolysis is pulsed electric fields, a novel technology able to hydrolysate food proteins in a non-thermal way where a high intensity pulsed electric field is applied. One more promising method is microwave-assisted extractions (MAE) that use electromagnetic radiation frequency higher than 300 MHz. Particularly, microwave-assisted enzymatic hydrolysis assisted in obtaining bioactive peptides from milk protein concentrates (Uluko et al. 2015).
Other novel physicochemical techniques are being explored to aid in the bioactive peptides production. High hydrostatic pressure (HHP) consists in immerse products in water and applied hydrostatic pressures between 100 and 1000 MPa, with or without heat treatment to create protein conformational changes (Naderi et al. 2017). Ultrasound is another technology that looks to affect protein structure, in this case using ultrasonic waves higher than 20 kHz. Finally, Ohmic heating consists of a passing electric current in a uniform way to heat the whey proteins while protecting their nutritional properties (Costa et al. 2018). All these techniques do not fully break the proteins, but significantly decrease the α-helical protein content and significantly increase its β-sheets and β-turns, which facilitates subsequent hydrolysis treatments (Alizadeh and Aliakbarlu 2020).
Fermentation using lactic acid bacteria is another way to hydrolyze whey proteins (Mayta-Apaza et al. 2021). Lactic acid bacteria produce proteolytic enzymatic systems that allow the hydrolysis of large proteins without chemicals involved in the process (García-Cano et al. 2019). However, the hydrolysates can be used by the bacteria as a substrate for strain growth, reducing the amount of product obtained.
Finally, enzymatic hydrolysis is the most common technique to produce bioactive peptides, being proteases (also referred as peptidases) the most widely used for WPH production. They are capable of carrying out specific and selective protein modifications (León-López et al. 2022). However, most of all current enzymatic treatments still have low yield and high costs (Cruz-Casas et al. 2021). At present, there are many commercially available proteases, mainly from animals, plants, and cultivable microorganisms, but there is an ever-growing need for new sources of food grade industrial enzymes, with different or improved activities (Ahmad et al. 2019).
Animalproteolytic enzymes
The use of animal proteases in food preparation dates back approximately to 6000 BC, where rennet, a preparation of chymosin and pepsin extracted from unweaned ruminants, was used in cheesemaking (Moschopoulou 2011). Currently, those and other gastrointestinal enzymes, like chymotrypsin, have been used to obtain bioactive peptides that have shown physiological benefits (Li et al. 2023a).
Trypsin and pepsin (Table 1) are enzymes that produce bioactive peptides capable of inhibit angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-IV), bioactive peptides with antioxidant activity (Power et al. 2014; Silveira et al. 2013), and iron-binding peptides (Kim et al. 2007). In addition, whey protein hydrolysates obtained using trypsin VI from bovine pancreas showed antibacterial activity against two food pathogens: Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus aureus (Demers-Mathieu et al. 2013). Interestingly, the utilization of pepsin was reported to generate anticarcinogenic bioactive peptides (Cakir and Tunali-Akbay 2021). Chymotrypsin has been used alone or in combination with trypsin to generate bioactive peptides with antimicrobial activity (Demers-Mathieu et al. 2013, Zapata Bustamante et al. 2021) and antioxidant activity (Kleekayai et al. 2020).
Plantproteolytic enzymes
Plant proteases are still less extensively used than animal sources (Table 2). They show higher proteolytic activity when compared with animal proteases (Feijoo-Siota and Villa 2011), which would make them not suitable to be applied on food products, due to the potential release of free amino acids and small peptides.
Nevertheless, there are cases of plant proteases successfully used to obtain bioactive peptides from whey proteins. Papain, an extensively used cysteine protease, was used to obtain bioactive peptides with antioxidant activity from WPI (Mohan et al. 2015). Also, three novel plant proteases derived from melon fruit, trompillo berries, and citrus flowers were used to generate bioactive peptides with the capacity to inhibit ACE in vitro (Mazorra-Manzano et al. 2020). Previously, Tavares et al. described the optimization of bioactive peptide production based on whey protein using aqueous extracts of Cynara cardunculus (Tavares et al. 2011).
Microbial proteolytic enzymes
Even though animal proteases have been used for centuries to transform whey and other products, proteases from microorganisms have gained more attention over the last years since they offer several advantages over other proteases sources. They can be produced more rapidly and at lower cost than animal enzymes (Putatunda et al. 2019), and show a higher thermostability, since microorganisms can be adapted to a wider range of environments (Bhatia et al. 2021). Moreover, simpler genetic manipulation of microorganisms allowed to obtain enzymes with desired features, like extracellular production (Razzaq et al. 2019) or growth on waste materials (Limkar et al. 2019), obtaining higher productivity with lower production costs (Solanki et al. 2021).
Currently, there are commercial available proteases obtained from microorganisms (Table 3). In particular, the Bacillus genus has a very prominent place in terms of the commercial production of proteases, among Bacteria. The most common enzymes used belong to the subtilisin-like family, like Alcalase, a serine endopeptidase that consists primarily of subtilisin A from Bacillus. licheniformis. It is used for protein hydrolysis in various industrial and research applications. Several reports date the utilization for bioactive peptide production with high antioxidant (de Castro and Sato 2014; Bustamante et al. 2021) and ACE inhibition capacities (Eberhardt et al. 2019). Another example of bacterial proteases is thermolysin, a neutral metalloprotease obtained from Bacillus stearothermophilus, which was used to obtain bioactive peptides from α-lactalbumin with antioxidant (Sadat et al. 2011) and ACE-inhibitory activity from β-lactoglobulin (Hernández-Ledesma et al. 2006).
Another important type of microbial proteases extensively used are fungal proteases. They are predominantly produced by members of the genera Aspergillus, Trichoderma, and Penicillium (Gurumallesh et al. 2019). One popular preparation used to modify whey proteins is flavourzyme, a peptidase mixture derived from Aspergillus oryzae. This preparation has eight different enzymes identified: two aminopeptidases, two dipeptidyl peptidases, three endopeptidases, and one α-amylase (Merz et al. 2015). It has been used to obtain bioactive peptides with antioxidant (Morales García et al. 2021; Ni et al. 2020; de Castro and Sato 2014; Bustamante et al. 2021) and inhibition of ACE activity.
Metagenomics proteolytic enzymes
The ever-growing need for novel enzymes and the development of new cheaper sequencing techniques has pushed forward the development of culture-independent techniques, like metagenomics, that allow the study of yet unknown microorganisms. These techniques involve cloning and analyzing DNA extracted directly from environmental samples, opening the door to the identification of novel enzymes from both cultivated and uncultivated microorganisms (Prayogo et al. 2020). There are two main metagenomics strategies for bioprospecting novel enzymes: sequence-based metagenomics and functional or activity-based metagenomics (Escuder-Rodríguez et al. 2018). Both cases start with a DNA extraction from an environmental sample (Costa et al. 2021). Sequence-based strategies involve the whole metagenomic DNA sequencing and identification of candidate genes by comparing predicted genes with sequences of known activity. These genes are then cloned into expression vectors and expressed in suitable hosts. Sequence-based metagenomics allows a deeper study of the microbial community and is not biased toward functional screening methods, but it has a high bioinformatics demand and the quality of the results obtained rely heavily on the databases used for the gene annotation.
On the other hand, functional-based screenings involve fragmentation of total environmental DNA, and cloning those fragments into expression vectors. The obtained clones are then functionally screened for specific activities (Robinson et al. 2021). The main advantage of this approach is that every positive clone is a functional enzyme. However, it has some drawbacks. First of all, it requires the selection of the most suitable expression vector, in which the environmental DNA fragment will be inserted. For small DNA fragments, ≤ 15 kb insert size, plasmids can be used. Some expression vectors, such as fosmids and cosmids (< 40 kb insert size), or bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs) and yeast artificial chromosomes (YACs) (> 40 kb insert size), allow the recovery of large biosynthetic gene clusters that encode the production of one or more specialized metabolites. Also, selecting the correct expression vector, finding the right expression conditions, having an efficient functional screening method, and avoiding DNA contamination of samples are essential for this approach (Escuder-Rodríguez et al. 2018). Another drawback from functional studies is that they imply the screening of a high number of clones to find the positive ones. However, functional metagenomics ensures that the identified candidates have the expected activity.
Both techniques have been successfully used to identify novel enzymes with promising catalytic activities (Table 4). There have been reports of several serine proteases identified from functional metagenomics: alkaline thermophilic protease (Zhang et al. 2011; Sun et al. 2020; Pessoa et al. 2017), alkaline proteases with high optimal pH (Devi et al. 2016; Neveu et al. 2011; Pushpam et al. 20111), and other mesophilic proteases (Purohit and Singh 2013; Biver et al. 2013). Via sequence-based metagenomics, only a few proteases have been identified to date. Among them, Prt1SU, a mesophilic protease obtained from a solid tannery waste metagenome (Verma and Sharma 2021), PersiProtease1 stable under various harsh conditions from tannery wastewater (Ariaeenejad et al. 2022), and Pr05, Pr06, Pr10 mesophilic proteases from dairy stabilization ponds (Irazoqui et al. 2023). Interestingly, the novel proteases identified by this approach PersiProtease 1, Pr05, Pr06, and Pr10, were able to hydrolyze WPC.
Finally, protein engineering technologies provide efficient ways to obtain desired characteristics of proteases such as cool adapted activities for food industries (Wang et al. 2023). Two main strategies for protease engineering are commonly used: rational design and directed evolution. Rational design was used to improve thermal stability (Ashraf et al. 2019; Osire et al. 2019) and catalytic performance (Jaouadi et al. 2010) in proteases. On the other hand, directed evolution to increase the activity and organic solvent resistance of a metalloprotease (Zhu et al. 2020) and to improve the proteolytic activity of a Bacillus pumilus in lower temperatures (Zhao and Feng 2018) was applied. To the best of our knowledge, no such efforts have been made to improve enzymes used for WPH production.
Other value-added products from whey: lactose derivatives
Carbohydrate segment held the leading growing market and is anticipated to account for the largest share in the market by 2027. Carbozymes are used in a wide range of applications such as industrial processes and products, prominently in food and beverage industries. In this way, whey also represents an appealing starting point to produce value-added products from milk sugar, lactose.
Lactose is the most important component in whey (4.5–5% w/v) after water (85–95% w/v). It is a disaccharide (β-D-galactopyranosyl-(1 → 4)-D-glucose) which by hydrolysis yields monomers of D-glucose and D-galactose. Commercially, it is one of the major dairy ingredients with numerous applications in different industries, including food industry for manufacturing creams, bakery products, and in the feed industry, predominantly for pig feed. Moreover, it is widely used for infant formula and as excipient or filler in the pharmaceutical industry. The global lactose market was valued at USD 2.22 billion in 2021 and is projected to grow to $3.00 billion by 2029 (www.fortunebusinessinsights.com).
Interestingly, in humans, lactose maldigestion increases with age: there have been reported levels of approximately 70% of the adult population in the world with this condition (Li et al. 2023b). These individuals tend to avoid consuming milk due to the risks of severe abdominal discomfort. In this context, it becomes necessary to transform lactose from whey, chemically, microbiologically, or enzymatically, to prepare derivatives for intolerant individuals and to obtain high value-added products (Rocha and Guerra 2020).
ß-galactosidases (E.C.3.2.1.23) are enzymes capable of hydrolyzing lactose. Firstly, an enzyme-galactose complex is formed and simultaneously the glucose is released. Subsequently, the enzyme transfers the galactose moiety to a nucleophilic acceptor that contains a hydroxyl group. If water is the nucleophilic acceptor, galactose is released and hydrolysis is completed. The mechanism of lactose hydrolysis can also have a transgalactolytic nature: if the galactose is transferred to a sugar, di-, tri-, and oligosaccharides of higher molecular weight are formed (Torres et al. 2010). These galactooligosaccharides (GOS) have been shown to have prebiotic properties, related to their impact on the composition and activities of the intestinal microbiota (Knol et al. 2005). The balance between both activities and the type of GOS obtained are highly dependent on the enzyme, but could be regulated by changing the concentration of galactose donors (Guerrero et al. 2015). Typically, around 30% and 50% of the initial lactose can be converted into GOS, and rarely surpass the 50 g 100 g − 1 levels, for a starting lactose concentration of 270 and 600 g L − 1 (Lamsal 2012). The initial lactose concentration is a key factor for GOS synthesis, as it determines the availability of galactosyl acceptors: more lactose available can increase the rate of GOS production.
The interest in GOS production and application in various food processes and pharmaceuticals has increased significantly (Souza et al. 2022). The market price for GOS is 10 to 12 times higher than that of edible lactose, estimated price around USD 10,000 a ton and world market size is approximately 20,000–22,000 tons/year with the largest annual increase of all lactose derivatives (10 to 20%) (Li et al. 2023c). For example, the addition of GOS in infant foods or foods specialized for the elderly and hospitalized people is a promising field, since these people are more vulnerable to alterations in the gut microbiota (Lamsal 2012).
In terms of the origin of ß-galactosidases, the enzymes are produced mainly by microorganisms, such as filamentous fungi, like Aspergillus lacticoffeatus and Aspergillus oryzae, bacteria, like Bifidobacterium longum and Lactobacillus delbrueckii, and yeasts, like strains of Kluyveromeyces sp (Souza et al. 2022). As with proteases, there is an ever need for novel enzymes. In this sense, metagenomics also represents an alternative to identify ß-galactosidases active at different environmental conditions and with improved activity (Liu et al. 2019; Eberhardt et al. 2020).
In addition to the search of novel enzymes, multiple efforts have been put in place to improve the enzymatic activity of β-galactosidases, by increasing the transgalactolitic activity, widening substrate specificity, increasing thermal stability, or reducing product inhibition (Movahedpour et al. 2022). A wide array of techniques has been used, such as site-directed mutagenesis, truncation, site-saturation mutagenesis, random mutagenesis, DNA shuffling, and monobody modifications (Lu et al. 2019). Two mutants of a β-glycosidase from Halothermothrix orenii, Y296F and F417S, showed an increased GOS production of around 10% (Hassan et al. 2016) and the GOS production of a β‑galactosidase from Thermotoga maritima was around 30% to 40% higher when the D568 residue was mutated with a serine and alanine, respectively (Talens-Perales et al. 2016). On the other hand, the substrate repertoire and the transglycosylation kinetics of the Agrobacterium sp. β-glycosidase were improved using a random mutagenesis approach (Kim et al. 2004). Another example of protein engineering is the addition of carbohydrate-binding modules (CMB) to the Thermotoga maritima β‐galactosidase to improve its immobilization: by adding Pyrococcus furiosus chitinase family 2 CBM the authors were capable of achieving nearly 100% of immobilization (Míguez Amil et al. 2019).
Besides GOS, other products can also be obtained from lactose, which have been comprehensively reviewed by many authors (da Silva et al. 2015; Schaafsma 2008). Lactulose (4-o-β-galactopyranosyl-d-fructose) is a lactose isomer with prebiotic properties and broad medical uses, like mildly purgative action and inhibitory properties against ammonia-producing microorganisms (Schaafsma 2008; Zimmer et al. 2017). Lactulose is produced commercially by isomerization (alkali hydroxide catalysis or alkaline epimerization) of α-lactose with calcium hydroxide as the catalyst (Audic et al. 2003), although it can also be obtained using ß-galactosidases to cleave the lactose and having fructose as the nucleophilic acceptor (Ubilla et al. 2020).
Another interesting derivative is lactobionic acid, chemically constituted of a gluconic acid bonded to a galactose. It is known for its numerous proven attributes as an antioxidant, chelator, and moisturizer agent (Cardoso et al. 2019). Lactobionic acid is produced by catalytic oxidation of the aldehyde group from lactose. Recent studies focus on biotechnological processes, using microbial enzymatic routes, to obtain this compound (Alonso et al. 2013; Gupta et al. 2018) but none of them are industrial-scale methods yet.
Conclusions and future perspectives
Cheese whey is both an environmental concern and an interesting raw material for value-added products due to its high organic load, mainly proteins and lactose. In this sense, there are three main options that can be used to transform these compounds into commodities: chemical, microbial, and enzymatic treatments. Enzymes represent a less polluting, more specific, and safer option, which explains why their market has been growing significantly over the past few years.
Proteases are the enzymes used to hydrolyze whey proteins. These hydrolysates not only have a better digestibility but can also have a large number of physiological effects on the body, making them interesting products. Although there are a great number of commercially available enzymes, the number of species used to obtain them is limited. Nowadays, there are three main sources of proteases: ruminants’ digestive tract, microorganisms, and, to a lesser extent, plants. It is important to notice that, besides plant proteases being more proteolytic than those from animals and microbes, no significant differences were noted between products obtained with enzymes from different sources. The main difference between sources lies in how the enzymes are produced. For centuries, animals were a simple and cheap way to obtain enzymes, but the advancement in biotechnological techniques, such as heterologous expression and protein engineering, allowed the production of new and improved enzymes, with increased catalytic activity or better adapted to different environmental conditions. In this sense, metagenomics has opened the door for a wide array of microbial enzymes with untapped potential. One future perspective involving proteases is the design of enzymatic cocktails, combining enzymes with diverse activity or hydrolysis profiles. These combinations could represent a way to obtain different hydrolysates or to improve process productivity.
Lactose can also be transformed into other value-added products, mainly by the utilization of ß-galactosidases. In contrast with proteases, the modification of lactose requires specific reactions and controlled conditions. The main products obtained from lactose are GOS, used on infant formula and elderly adults’ food since they have prebiotic activity. Lactulose is another interesting product because of its prebiotic properties and broad medical applications, and can be synthesized from lactose using ß-galactosidases. The number of commercially available ß-galactosidases is still low when compared to proteases, being microorganisms the main sources for these enzymes, mostly fungi from the genera Aspergillus and Kluveromyces and bacteria from the Bacillus genus.
One of the most interesting aspects of enzymatic treatments is that they can be applied on a broad range of conditions, since different enzymes can tolerate, for example, different temperatures or pH levels. In this regard, metagenomics proves an appealing tool to identify novel enzymes, from both cultivable and uncultivable microorganisms. Metagenomics screening can provide novel enzymes with different ranges of physicochemical conditions and novel products, to tailor the process to different or more specific conditions and to desired products. In addition, the development of enzyme engineering strategies provides an interesting opportunity to create highly efficient enzymes for the cost-effective production of value-added products.
References
Ahmad T, Singh RS, Gupta G, Sharma A, Kaur B (2019) Metagenomics in the search for industrial enzymes. In Advances in Enzyme Technology (pp 419–451). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-64114-4.00015-7
Alizadeh O, Aliakbarlu J (2020) Effects of ultrasound and Ohmic heating pretreatments on hydrolysis, antioxidant and antibacterial activities of whey protein concentrate and its fractions. Lwt 131:109913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109913
Alonso S, Rendueles M, Díaz M (2013) Bio-production of lactobionic acid: current status, applications and future prospects. Biotechnol Adv 31(8):1275–1291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.04.010
Ariaeenejad S, Kavousi K, Mamaghani ASA, Ghasemitabesh R, Salekdeh GH (2022) Simultaneous hydrolysis of various protein-rich industrial wastes by a naturally evolved protease from tannery wastewater microbiota. Sci Totalenviron 815:152796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152796
Ashraf NM, Krishnagopal A, Hussain A, Kastner D, Sayed AMM, Mok YK, Swaminathan K, Zeeshan N (2019) Engineering of serine protease for improved thermostability and catalytic activity using rational design. Int J Biol Macromol 126:229–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.218
Audic JL, Chaufer B, Daufin G (2003) Non-food applications of milk components and dairy co-products: a review. Lait 83(6):417–438. https://doi.org/10.1051/lait:2003027
Bhatia RK, Ullah S, Hoque HZ, Ahmad I, Yang YH, Bhatt AK, Bhatia SK (2021) Psychrophiles: a source of cold-adapted enzymes for energy efficient biotechnological industrial processes. J Envir Chem Eng 9:104607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104607
Biver S, Portetelle D, Vandenbol M (2013) Characterization of a new oxidant-stable serine protease isolated by functional metagenomics. Springer plus 2:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-410
Brandelli A, Daroit DJ, Corrêa APF (2015) Whey as a source of peptides with remarkable biological activities. Food Res Int 73:149–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2015.01.016
Buchanan D, Martindale W, Romeih E, Hebishy E (2023) Recent advances in whey processing and valorisation: technological and environmental perspectives. Int J Dairy Technol 76(2):291–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0307.12935
Buckley JD, Thomson RL, Coates AM, Howe PR, DeNichilo MO, Rowney MK (2010) Supplementation with a whey protein hydrolysate enhances recovery of muscle force-generating capacity following eccentric exercise. J Sci Med Sport 13(1):178–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2008.06.007
Bustamante SZ, Gonzalez JG, Sforza S, Tedeschi T (2021) Bioactivity and peptide profile of whey protein hydrolysates obtained from Colombian double-cream cheese production and their products after gastrointestinal digestion. Lwt 145:111334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111334
Cakir B, Tunali-Akbay T (2021) Potential anticarcinogenic effect of goat milk-derived bioactive peptides on HCT-116 human colorectal carcinoma cell line. Anal Biochem 622:114166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2021.114166
Cardoso T, Marques C, Dagostin JLA, Masson ML (2019) Lactobionic acid as a potential food ingredient: recent studies and applications. J Food Sci 84(7):1672–1681. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.14686
Coelho RJS, Gabardo S, Marim AVC, Bolognesi LS, Pimentel Filho NJ, Ayub MAZ (2021) Porungo cheese whey: a new substrate to produce β-galactosidase. Ann Braz Acad Sci. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-6723.03821
Costa NR, Cappato LP, Ferreira MVS, Pires RP, Moraes J, Esmerino EA, Silva R, Neto R, Tavares M, Freitas M, Silveira Junior R, Rodrigues F, Bisaggio R, Cavalcanti R, Raices R, Silva M, Cruz AG (2018) Ohmic heating: a potential technology for sweet whey processing. Food Res Int 106:771–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.01.046
Costa ÂM, Santos AO, Sousa J, Rodrigues JL, Gudiña EJ, Silvério SC, Rodrigues LR (2021) Improved method for the extraction of high-quality DNA from lignocellulosic compost samples for metagenomic studies. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 105:8881–8893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-021-11647-7
Cruz-Casas DE, Aguilar CN, Ascacio-Valdés JA, Rodríguez-Herrera R, Chávez-González ML, Flores-Gallegos AC (2021) Enzymatic hydrolysis and microbial fermentation: the most favorable biotechnological methods for the release of bioactive peptides. Food Chem 3:100047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fochms.2021.100047
da Silva AN, Perez R, Minim VPR, Martins DDSA, Minim LA (2015) Integrated production of whey protein concentrate and lactose derivatives: what is the best combination? Food Res Int 73:62–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2015.03.009
de Castro RJS, Sato HH (2014) Advantages of an acid protease from Aspergillus oryzae over commercial preparations for production of whey protein hydrolysates with antioxidant activities. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 3(3):58–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2013.11.012
Demers-Mathieu V, Gauthier SF, Britten M, Fliss I, Robitaille G, Jean J (2013) Antibacterial activity of peptides extracted from tryptic hydrolyzate of whey protein by nanofiltration. Int Dairy J 28(2):94–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2012.09.003
Devi SG, Fathima AA, Sanitha M, Iyappan S, Curtis WR, Ramya M (2016) Expression and characterization of alkaline protease from the metagenomic library of tannery activated sludge. J BiosciBioeng 122:694–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2016.05.012
Eberhardt A, López EC, Ceruti RJ, Marino F, Mammarella EJ, Manzo RM, Sihufe GA (2019) Influence of the degree of hydrolysis on the bioactive properties of whey protein hydrolysates using Alcalase®. Int J Dairy Technol 72(4):573–584. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0307.12606
Eberhardt MF, Irazoqui JM, Amadio AF (2020) β-galactosidases from a sequence-based metagenome: cloning, expression, purification and characterization. Microorganisms 9(1):55. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9010055
Escuder-Rodríguez J-J, DeCastro M-E, Becerra M, Rodríguez-Belmonte E, González-Siso M-I (2018) Advances of functional metagenomics in harnessing thermozymes. In: Metagenomics; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102268-9.00015-X
Feijoo-Siota L, Villa TG (2011) Native and biotechnologically engineered plant proteases with industrial applications. Food Bioproc Tech 4:1066–1088. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-010-0431-4
García-Cano I, Rocha-Mendoza D, Ortega-Anaya J, Wang K, Kosmerl E, Jiménez-Flores R (2019) Lactic acid bacteria isolated from dairy products as potential producers of lipolytic, proteolytic and antibacterial proteins. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 103:5243–5257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-019-09844-6
Guerrero C, Vera C, Conejeros R, Illanes A (2015) Transgalactosylation and hydrolytic activities of commercial preparations of β-galactosidase for the synthesis of prebiotic carbohydrates. Enzyme Microb Technol 70:9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2014.12.006
Gupta VK, Treichel H, Shapaval V, de Oliveira LA, Tuohy MG (2018) Microbial functional foods and nutraceuticals. Chichester, UK
Gurumallesh P, Alagu K, Ramakrishnan B, Muthusamy S (2019) A systematic reconsideration on proteases. Int J Biol Macromol 128:254–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.01.081
Hasan MJ, Haque P, Rahman MM (2022) Protease enzyme based cleaner leather processing: a review. J CleanProd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132826
Hassan N, Geiger B, Gandini R, Patel BK, Kittl R, Haltrich D, Nguyen T, Divne C, Tan TC (2016) Engineering a thermostable Halothermothrix orenii β-glucosidase for improved galacto-oligosaccharide synthesis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100(8):3533–3543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-7118-8
Hernández-Ledesma B, Ramos M, Recio I, Amigo L (2006) Effect of β-lactoglobulin hydrolysis with thermolysin under denaturing temperatures on the release of bioactive peptides. J Chromatogr A 1116(1–2):31–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2006.03.006
Irazoqui JM, Eberhardt MF, Santiago GM, Amadio AF (2023) Characterization of novel proteases identified by metagenomic analysis from dairy stabilization ponds. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-023-12591-4
Jaouadi B, Aghajari N, Haser R, Bejar S (2010) Enhancement of the thermostability and the catalytic efficiency of Bacillus pumilus CBS protease by site-directed mutagenesis. Biochimie 92(4):360–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biochi.2010.01.008
Kelly P (2019) Manufacture of whey protein products: concentrates, isolate, whey protein fractions and microparticulated. In: Whey proteins (pp 97–122). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812124-5.00003-5
Kim YW, Lee SS, Warren RAJ, Withers SG (2004) Directed evolution of a glycosynthase from Agrobacterium sp. increases its catalytic activity dramatically and expands its substrate repertoire. J Biol Chem 279(41):42787–42793. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M406890200
Kim SB, Seo IS, Khan MA, Ki KS, Lee WS, Lee HJ, Shin HS, Kim HS (2007) Enzymatic hydrolysis of heated whey: iron-binding ability of peptides and antigenic protein fractions. J Dairy Sci 90(9):4033–4042. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0228
Kleekayai T, Le Gouic AV, Deracinois B, Cudennec B, FitzGerald RJ (2020) In vitro characterization of the antioxidative properties of whey protein hydrolysates generated under pH-and non pH-controlled conditions. Foods 9(5):582. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9050582
Knol J, Scholtens P, Kafka C, Steenbakkers J, Gro S, Helm K, Wells J (2005) Colon microflora in infants fed formula with galacto-and fructo-oligosaccharides: more like breast-fed infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 40(1):36–42. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005176-200501000-00007
Lamsal BP (2012) Production, health aspects and potential food uses of dairy prebiotic galactooligosaccharides. J SciFoodAgric 92(10):2020–2028. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.5712
León-López A, Pérez-Marroquín XA, Estrada-Fernández AG, Campos-Lozada G, Morales-Peñaloza A, Campos-Montiel RG, Aguirre-Álvarez G (2022) Milk whey hydrolysates as high value-added natural polymers: functional properties and applications. Polymers 14(6):1258. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14061258
Li A, Zheng J, Han X, Yang S, Cheng S, Zhao J, Zhou W, Lu Y (2023a) Advances in low-lactose /lactose-free dairy products and their production. Foods 12:2553. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12132553
Li A, Zheng J, Han X, Jiang Z, Yang B, Yang S, Zhou W, Li C, Sun M (2023b) Health implication of lactose intolerance and updates on its dietary management. Int Dairy J 105608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2023.105608
Li J, Hartinger C, Zhu F (2023c) Physicochemical properties of infant formula model emulsions stabilized by different whey protein hydrolysates and characteristics of interfacial peptides. Food Hydrocoll 145:109035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2023.109035
Limkar MB, Pawar SV, Rathod VK (2019) Statistical optimization of xylanase and alkaline protease co-production by Bacillus sp. using Box-Behnken design under submerged fermentation using wheat bran as a substrate. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 17:455–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2018.12.008
Linde GA, Junior AL, de Faria EV, Colauto NB, de Moraes FF, Zanin GM (2009) Taste modification of amino acids and protein hydrolysate by α-cyclodextrin. Food Res Int 42(7):814–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2009.03.016
Liu P, Wang W, Zhao J, Wei D (2019) Screening novel β-galactosidases from a sequence-based metagenome and characterization of an alkaline β-galactosidase for the enzymatic synthesis of galactooligosaccharides. Protein Expr Purif 155:104–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pep.2018.12.001
Lu L, Guo L, Wang K, Liu Y, Xiao M (2019) β-Galactosidases: a great tool for synthesizing galactose-containing carbohydrates. Biotechnol Adv 39:107465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.107465
Mann B, Athira S, Sharma R, Kumar R, Sarkar P (2019) Bioactive peptides from whey proteins. In: Whey proteins (pp 519–547). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812124-5.00015-1
Mayta-Apaza AC, García-Cano I, Dabrowski K, Jiménez-Flores R (2021) Bacterial diversity analysis and evaluation proteins hydrolysis during the acid whey and fish waste fermentation. Microorganisms 9(1):100. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9010100
Mazorra-Manzano MA, Mora-Cortes WG, Leandro-Roldan MM, González-Velázquez DA, Torres-Llanez MJ, Ramírez-Suarez JC, González-Córdova AF, Vallejo-Córdoba B (2020) Production of whey protein hydrolysates with angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitory activity using three new sources of plant proteases. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 28:101724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2020.101724
Merz M, Eisele T, Berends P, Appel D, Rabe S, Blank I, Stressler T, Fischer L (2015) Flavourzyme, an enzyme preparation with industrial relevance: automated nine-step purification and partial characterization of eight enzymes. J Agric Food Chem 63(23):5682–5693. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.5b01665
Míguez Amil S, Jiménez-Ortega E, Ramírez-Escudero M, Talens-Perales D, Marín-Navarro J, Polaina J, Julia Sanz-Aparicio J, Fernandez-Leiro R (2019) The cryo-EM structure of Thermotoga maritima β-Galactosidase: quaternary structure guides protein engineering. ACS Chem Biol 15(1):179–188. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.9b00752
Mohan A, Udechukwu MC, Rajendran SR, Udenigwe CC (2015) Modification of peptide functionality during enzymatic hydrolysis of whey proteins. RSC Adv 5(118):97400–97407. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA15140F
Morales García J, Herrera-Rocha F, Cavajalino AS, Duran Baron R, González Barrios AF, Udenigwe CC (2021) Effects of processing conditions on hydrolysates of proteins from whole whey and formation of Maillard reaction products. J Food Process Preserv 45(9):e15469. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.15469
Moschopoulou E (2011) Characteristics of rennet and other enzymes from small ruminants used in cheese production. Small Rumin Res 101(1–3):188–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2011.09.039
Movahedpour A, Ahmadi N, Ghalamfarsa F, Ghesmati Z, Khalifeh M, Maleksabet A, Savardashtaki A (2022) β-Galactosidase: from its source and applications to its recombinant form. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 69(2):612–628. https://doi.org/10.1002/bab.2137
Naderi N, House JD, Pouliot Y, Doyen A (2017) Effects of high hydrostatic pressure processing on hen egg compounds and egg products. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 16(4):707–720. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12273
Neveu J, Regeard C, DuBow MS (2011) Isolation and characterization of two serine proteases from metagenomic libraries of the Gobi and Death Valley deserts. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 91:635–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-011-3256-9
Ni H, Hayes H, Stead D, Liu G, Yang H, Li H, Raikos V (2020) Interaction of whey protein with polyphenols from salal fruits (Gaultheria shallon) and the effects on protein structure and hydrolysis pattern by Flavourzyme®. Int J Food Sci Technol 55(3):1281–1288. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.14394
Osire T, Yang T, Xu M, Zhang X, Li X, Niyomukiza S, Rao Z (2019) Lys-Arg mutation improved the thermostability of Bacillus cereus neutral protease through increased residue interactions. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 35(11):173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-019-2751-5
Pessoa TB, Rezende RP, Marques EDLS, Pirovani CP, Dos Santos TF, dos Santos Gonçalves AC, Romano AC, Dotivo NC, Freitas ACO, Salay LC, Dias JC (2017) Metagenomic alkaline protease from mangrove sediment. J Basic Microbiol 57(11):962–973. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.201700159
Power O, Fernández A, Norris R, Riera FA, FitzGerald RJ (2014) Selective enrichment of bioactive properties during ultrafiltration of a tryptic digest of β-lactoglobulin. J Funct Foods 9:38–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2014.04.002
Prayogo FA, Budiharjo A, Kusumaningrum HP, Wijanarka W, Suprihadi A, Nurhayati N (2020) Metagenomic applications in exploration and development of novel enzymes from nature: a review. J Genet EngBiotechnol 18(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43141-020-00043-9
Purohit MK, Singh SP (2013) A metagenomic alkaline protease from saline habitat: cloning, over-expression and functional attributes. Int J Biol Macromol 53:138–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2012.10.032
Pushpam PL, Rajesh T, Gunasekaran P (2011) Identification and characterization of alkaline serine protease from goat skin surface metagenome. AMB Express 1(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/2191-0855-1-3
Putatunda C, Kundu BS, Bhatia R (2019) Purification and characterization of alkaline protease from Bacillus sp. HD292. Proc Natl AcadSci India B BiolSci 89:957–965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-018-1011-z
Razzaq A, Shamsi S, Ali A, Ali Q, Sajjad M, Malik A, Ashraf M (2019) Microbial proteases applications. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 7:110. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00110
Rivas-Vela CI, Amaya-Llano SL, Castaño-Tostado E, Castillo-Herrera GA (2021) Protein hydrolysis by subcritical water: a new perspective on obtaining bioactive peptides. Molecules 26(21):6655. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26216655
Robinson SL, Piel J, Sunagawa S (2021) A roadmap for metagenomic enzyme discovery. Nat Prod Rep 38(11):1994–2023. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1np00006c
Rocha J, Guerra A (2020) On the valorization of lactose and its derivatives from cheese whey as a dairy industry by-product: an overview. Eur Food Res Technol 246(11):2161–2174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-020-03580-2
Sadat L, Cakir-Kiefer C, N’Negue MA, Gaillard JL, Girardet JM, Miclo L (2011) Isolation and identification of antioxidative peptides from bovine α-lactalbumin. Int Dairy J 21(4):214–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2010.11.011
Schaafsma G (2008) Lactose and lactose derivatives as bioactive ingredients in human nutrition. IntDairy J 18:458–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2007.11.013
Silveira ST, Martínez-Maqueda D, Recio I, Hernández-Ledesma B (2013) Dipeptidyl peptidase-IV inhibitory peptides generated by tryptic hydrolysis of a whey protein concentrate rich in β-lactoglobulin. Food Chem 141(2):1072–1077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.03.056
Singhania RR, Patel AK, Thomas L, Goswami M, Giri BS, Pandey A (2015) Industrial enzymes. In: Industrial biorefineries & white biotechnology (pp 473–497). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63453-5.00015-X
Sinha R, Radha C, Prakash J, Kaul P (2007) Whey protein hydrolysate: functional properties, nutritional quality and utilization in beverage formulation. Food Chem 101(4):1484–1491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.04.021
Smithers GW (2008) Whey and whey proteins—from ‘gutter-to-gold.’ Int Dairy J 18(7):695–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2008.03.008
Solanki P, Putatunda C, Kumar A, Bhatia R, Walia A (2021) Microbial proteases: ubiquitous enzymes with innumerable uses. 3 Biotech 11(10):428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-021-02928-z
Souza AFCE, Gabardo S, Coelho RDJS (2022) Galactooligosaccharides: physiological benefits, production strategies, and industrial application. J Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2022.09.020
Sun J, Li P, Liu Z, Huang W, Mao X (2020) A novel thermostable serine protease from a metagenomic library derived from marine sediments in the East China Sea. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 104:9229–9238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-020-10879-3
Talens-Perales D, Polaina J, Marín-Navarro J (2016) Structural dissection of the active site of Thermotoga maritima β-galactosidase identifies key residues for transglycosylating activity. J Agric Food Chem 64(14):2917–2924
Tavares TG, Contreras MM, Amorim M, Martín-Álvarez PJ, Pintado ME, Recio I, Malcata FX (2011) Optimisation, by response surface methodology, of degree of hydrolysis and antioxidant and ACE-inhibitory activities of whey protein hydrolysates obtained with cardoon extract. Int Dairy J 21(12):926–933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2011.05.013
Torres DP, Gonçalves MDPF, Teixeira JA, Rodrigues LR (2010) Galacto-oligosaccharides: production, properties, applications, and significance as prebiotics. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 9(5):438–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4337.2010.00119.x
Ubilla C, Ramírez N, Valdivia F, Vera C, Illanes A, Guerrero C (2020) Synthesis of lactulose in continuous stirred tank reactor with β-galactosidase of Apergillus oryzae immobilized in monofunctionalglyoxyl agarose support. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 8:699. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00699
Ulug SK, Jahandideh F, Wu J (2021) Novel technologies for the production of bioactive peptides. Trends Food SciTechnol 108:27–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.12.002
Uluko H, Zhang S, Liu L, Tsakama M, Lu J, Lv J (2015) Effects of thermal, microwave, and ultrasound pretreatments on antioxidative capacity of enzymatic milk protein concentrate hydrolysates. J Funct Foods 18:1138–1146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2014.11.024
Verma SK, Sharma PC (2021) Isolation and biochemical characterization of a novel serine protease identified from solid tannery waste metagenome. Biologia 76:3163–3174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11756-021-00832-8
Wang F, Ma X, Sun Y, Guo E, Shi C, Yuan Z, Li Y, Li Q, Lu F, Liu Y (2023) Structure-guided engineering of a protease to improve its activity under cold conditions. J Agric Food Chem 71(33):12528–12537. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.3c02338
Zandona E, Blažić M, RežekJambrak A (2021) Whey utilization: sustainable uses and environmental approach. Int J DairyTechnol 59(2):147–161. https://doi.org/10.17113/ftb.59.02.21.6968
Zapata Bustamante S, Sepulveda Valencia JU, Correa Londono GA, Durango Restrepo DL, Gil Gonzalez JH (2021) Hydrolysates from ultrafiltrated double-cream cheese whey: enzymatic hydrolysis, antioxidant, and ACE-inhibitory activities and peptide characterization. J Food Process Preserv 45(10):e15790. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.15790
Zhang Y, Zhao J, Zeng R (2011) Expression and characterization of a novel mesophilic protease from metagenomic library derived from Antarctic coastal sediment. Extremophiles 15:23–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00792-010-0332-5
Zhao HY, Feng H (2018) Engineering Bacillus pumilus alkaline serine protease to increase its low-temperature proteolytic activity by directed evolution. BMC Biotechnol 18:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12896-018-0451-0
Zhu F, He B, Gu F, Deng H, Chen C, Wang W, Chen N (2020) Improvement in organic solvent resistance and activity of metalloprotease by directed evolution. J Biotechnol 309:68–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2019.12.014
Zimmer FC, Souza AH, Silveira AF, Santos MR, Matsushita M, Souza NE, Rodrigues AC (2017) Application of factorial design for optimization of the synthesis of lactulose obtained from whey permeate. J Braz Chem Soc 28:2326–2333. https://doi.org/10.21577/0103-5053.20170083
Zotta T, Solieri L, Iacumin L, Picozzi C, Gullo M (2020) Valorization of cheese whey using microbial fermentations. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 104(7):2749–2764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-020-10408-2
Funding
This work was supported by the National Agency for Promotion of Investigation in Science and Technology (ANPCyT) grant Scientific and Technological Research Projects (PICT) 2018–4396.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MFE and JMI performed the bibliographic research and wrote the manuscript. All other authors contributed to the research and critically revised the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Irazoqui, J.M., Santiago, G.M., Mainez, M.E. et al. Enzymes for production of whey protein hydrolysates and other value-added products. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 108, 354 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-024-13117-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-024-13117-2