Abstract
Acinetobacter baumannii is considered as one of the most virulent and infectious organisms that have an increased ability to both evade host immune response and resist various classes of antibiotics, leading to life-threatening infections. Multiple virulence factors have been implicated in the high prevalence rate of A. baumannii in hospitalized and immunocompromised patients. Moreover, improper use of antibiotics has led to the emergence of extensive drug-resistant strains that urgently require alternative strategies to control this superbug. Unfortunately, the availability of a licensed vaccine against A. baumannii infections is still challenged by the vast diversity among A. baumannii strains. Here, we report the development of a novel pentavalent vaccine candidate composed of two recombinant proteins (Wza and YiaD) and a pool of capsular polysaccharides isolated from 3 clinical isolates. We tested this new vaccine in vivo in a mouse model of peritonitis against the standard strain ATCC 19606 in addition to 3 clinical isolates of A. baumannii. Immunization with this vaccine completely protected the challenged mice with 100% survival rate in the case of all the tested bacteria. Further clinical studies are urgently needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this proprietary vaccine to protect patients from A. baumannii lethal infections.
Key points
• Recombinant proteins pool (Wza and YiaD) immunization led to a synergistic immune response.
• Capsular polysaccharides pool induced up to 90% protection of tested clinical isolates.
• The pentavalent pool showed superiority with 100% survival of immunized mice.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Acinetobacter baumannii is a non-motile Gram-negative coccobacillus (Elhosseiny and Attia 2018). Although most Acinetobacter species are considered non-pathogenic environmental organisms (Geisinger et al. 2019; Wong et al. 2017), A. baumannii is considered one of the most dangerous opportunistic pathogens. It affects immunocompromised and hospitalized patients mainly (Elhosseiny and Attia 2018; Kroger et al. 2016), where long intensive care unit (ICU) stay has been recognized as the number one predisposing factor for A. baumannii infections (Ayoub Moubareck and Hammoudi Halat 2020; Kroger and Kary 2016; Lee et al. 2017; McConnell et al. 2013). This serious pathogen could cause multiple infections including pulmonary, urinary tract infections, osteomyelitis, traumatic or post-surgical wound infections, bacteremia, and post-neurosurgical meningitis (Ayoub Moubareck and Hammoudi Halat 2020; Gellings et al. 2020; Piperaki et al. 2019). The mortality rate of A. baumannii-associated bacteremia and pneumonia is 60% and 70%, respectively (Gellings and Wilkins 2020). A. baumannii is equipped with an array of virulence determinants that enhance its ability to evade host immune response and survive in hospital environments (Cerqueira and Peleg 2011; Dijkshoorn et al. 2007; Harding et al. 2018). Outer membrane proteins (OMPs), cell envelope-associated factors, biofilm formation, secretory systems, quorum sensing, and micronutrient acquisition systems have been recognized as the major virulence factors that aid A. baumannii to resist antibiotics, invade host cell, and finally, trigger apoptosis (Morris et al. 2019; Skariyachan et al. 2019).
A. baumannii has also developed remarkable antibiotic resistance mechanisms including: upregulated multidrug efflux pumps, enzymatic modification of antibiotics, target gene mutation, and altered outer membrane permeability (Ayoub Moubareck and Hammoudi Halat 2020; Nowak and Paluchowska 2016; Piperaki and Tzouvelekis 2019). The combined effect of those mechanisms has led to the emergence of multi drug resistant (MDR) and even extensive drug-resistant (XDR) strains of A. baumannii (Gellings and Wilkins 2020; Kroger and Kary 2016; Martins et al. 2013). Carbapenems were initially considered for treatment of MDR A. baumannii; however, colistin and tigecycline were then used to treat carbapenem-resistant strains ( Benmahmod et al. 2019; Piperaki and Tzouvelekis 2019; Skariyachan and Taskeen 2019). Unfortunately, many studies have recently revealed the emergence of colistin- and/or tigecycline-resistant A. baumannii clinical isolates, rendering the last resort antibiotic treatment ineffective (Sun et al. 2018). The World Health Organization has recognized MDR and XDR A. baumannii as the number one critical priority pathogen that urgently requires new therapeutics, where concerns are growing continuously about the fact that hospital-acquired A. baumannii infections will soon be untreatable (Morris and Dexter 2019; Shlaes and Bradford 2018). This stressful combat strongly encourages the medical community to focus on primitively preventing infection through different vaccination strategies. As far as we know, there is still no licensed vaccine against A. baumannii regardless of the major research effort that has suggested multiple vaccine candidates that have been proved effective at some levels in pre-clinical trials [reviewed in (Gellings and Wilkins 2020)]. However, the major challenge in development of an effective vaccine remains to be the vast diversity among A. baumannii clinical isolates (Singh et al. 2018).
Active immunization utilizes different antigens, such as whole cell, pure proteins, or capsular polysaccharides as vaccine candidates (Ahmad et al. 2019, 2016; Hosseingholi et al. 2014). Incomplete inactivation of the bacterial cell and the presence of pyrogenic endotoxins are the major drawbacks of whole cell-based immunization, which might initiate infection or unfavorable immune response, respectively (Moriel et al. 2013). Protein-based bacterial components have been extensively evaluated as vaccine candidates, where the use of in silico computational mapping techniques has massively contributed to the identification of novel potent A. baumannii epitopes (Ahmad and Ranaghan 2019; Hosseingholi and Rasooli 2014). These proteins include phospholipase D, outer membrane protein BamA and FilF, vesicle’s outer membrane proteins FKIB and Ompp1, outer membrane protein nuclease NucAb, Surface Loops of ZnuD, the functional exposed amino acid BauA, and outer membrane proteins (OmpA, OmpW, OmpK, and Omp22) that induce specific, desirable, and broad-spectrum humoral and cellular immunity (Ahmad and Tawfik 2016; Garcia-Quintanilla et al. 2013; Gellings and Wilkins 2020; Qamsari et al. 2020). However, the efficacy of these proteins still needs further evaluation against different A. baumannii clinical isolates. Capsular polysaccharides have revealed promising protection levels against certain standard strains of A. baumannii in pre-clinical trials (Hosseingholi and Rasooli 2014). Regarding their composition, capsules are formed of repeated linear or branched polysaccharide units containing unique glycans with atypical acetylation sites or may be exclusively decorated with amino sugars (Kasimova et al. 2017). Therefore, the high variations in composition of capsular polysaccharides limit their effectiveness as vaccine candidates against various A. baumannii clinical isolates (Yang et al. 2017). Nevertheless, the use of a capsule-based vaccine is generally associated with short-term immune protection as it relays primarily on T cell independent immune stimulation (Russo et al. 2013).
In this study, we have evaluated the individual and pooled (pentavalent) protective effects of two newly employed recombinant proteins (YiaD and Wza) and capsular polysaccharides isolated from different clinical isolates as vaccine candidates against A. baumannii infections using the in vivo mouse model of peritonitis.
Materials and methods
Bacterial strains and isolates
Standard strains
E. coli BL-21(DE3)pLysS and Top10 standard strains were purchased from Novagen and Invitrogen (USA), respectively. The standard ATCC 19606 was used as the standard strain throughout our study.
Clinical isolates and their identification
One hundred A. baumannii clinical isolates were recovered from patient specimens in Mansoura University Hospitals between April 2019 and November 2019. Isolates were recovered from blood (39 samples), sputum (35 samples), urine (16 samples), and wound (10 samples). They were identified as A. baumannii according to standard microbiological techniques, including colony morphology, Gram stain, biochemical reactions, and molecular-based methods (PCR detection of both gltA and blaOXA-51-like genes) (Benmahmod et al. 2019; Said et al. 2018).
Recombinant proteins
Cloning, expression, and purification of Wza and YiaD
Genomic DNA of A. baumannii standard ATCC 19606 strain was extracted and used as template for PCR. Wza (OmpA family lipoprotein) and YiaD (outer membrane protein; involved in capsule export) genes were cloned and expressed individually using standard protocols. The coding sequences for Wza and YiaD genes were amplified using custom-designed primer pairs (Table 1). The designed primers were tagged with restriction sites of BamHI and EcoRI (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), and designed to allow the amplified coding sequence to fit in-frame with the expression vector pRSET-B (Invitrogen, USA). The pRSET-B/Wza and pRSET-B/YiaD recombinant vectors were transformed individually into chemically competent E. coli Top10 and plated on LB/ampicillin (100 µg/ml) agar plates. Recombinant vectors were extracted from the transformed colonies and tested by double-digestion/gel-electrophoresis. pRSET-B/Wza and pRSET-B/YiaD recombinant vectors were transformed into chemically competent E. coli BL-21(DE3)pLysS and then plated on LB/ampicillin agar plates. Single transformed colony was transferred into 20 ml of LB/ampicillin and incubated at 37 °C overnight with shaking at 150 rpm. Finally, LB broth (500 ml) was inoculated with the overnight culture and incubated at 37 °C till OD600 = 0.1; then further incubated at 30 °C and 37 °C for Wza and YiaD, respectively, with 200 rpm shaking till OD600 = 0.4–0.6. Isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was added at final concentration of 1 mM to induce protein expression, culture was further allowed to grow under the same conditions for 6 h. Cells were then harvested and transferred to the two-step purification stage. Firstly, inclusion bodies purification protocol was applied to both proteins according to the previously described protocol (Almansoor 2017). Purified inclusion bodies were then solubilized according to GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB 1999. The obtained solubilized proteins were then purified using Ni+2 Sepharose 6 Fast Flow packed column (GE Healthcare) following the manufacturer’s directions using 25 mM and 250 mM imidazole in washing and elution steps, respectively. To identify and confirm the purity of obtained recombinant proteins, 20-µl samples were screened on SDS-PAGE and western blot using anti-histidine tagged antibodies (Mellick and Rodgers 2007), to detect the expected bands of Wza and YiaD at 28.89 and 22.49 kDa, respectively.
Immunization of mice with either Wza or YiaD recombinant proteins
Purified recombinant proteins were used to immunize female BALB/c mice (20–25 gm weight) as described previously with minor modifications (Girgis et al. 2020). In brief, each mouse was injected subcutaneously (SC) with a mixture of 300 µg protein and 2 mg aluminum hydroxide [Alum (Sigma-Aldrich Co., USA)] as adjuvant, in 200 µl saline. Mice received the same dose weekly for three consecutive weeks as booster doses. A control group was immunized with alum only. Blood samples were collected at day zero (as a negative control), 14, 21, and 28, to determine the antibody titer in the collected sera using enzyme-linked immuno-sorbent assay (ELISA).
Recombinant proteins pool
A pool of equimolar concentrations of both Wza and YiaD was used to immunize female BALB/c mice. Each mouse received a total of 600 µg proteins (300 µg of each recombinant protein) and 2 mg alum per dose at the same time intervals as mentioned before. Immune sera formed against the pool of proteins were then isolated at day 28 from the start of immunization protocol to screen their cross-reactivity with the clinical A. baumannii isolates using ELISA.
Capsular polysaccharides
Extraction and quantification of capsular polysaccharides
Capsular polysaccharides of the standard strain ATCC 19606 in addition to selected clinical isolates (isolates No. 51, 63, 76, 79, and 100) were extracted as previously described (Tipton and Rather 2019). Briefly, bacteria were streaked on LB agar plates and incubated at 37 °C for about 18 h. Cells were then scraped and suspended in nutrient broth to optical density (OD600) about 0.65. Bacterial cells were harvested from 1 ml of suspension via centrifugation. The pellet was re-suspended in 200 μl lysis buffer (2.4 ml 1 M Tris–HCL; pH 8, 0.0002 g CaCl2, 0.081 g MgCl2 and 3 mg/ml Lysozyme). Suspensions were then incubated at 37 °C for 60 min followed by vortex and three consecutive cycle extractions (freeze/thaw cycles) at − 80 °C and 37 °C. Following that, 1 μl of both DNase and RNase (20 μg/ml each) were added to extracts and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min; then 10 μl of 10% SDS were added and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. Extracts were boiled in water bath at 100 °C for 10 min and allowed to cool at room temperature. At this point, 150 μl of lysis buffer containing proteinase K (2 mg/ml) were added to extracts and incubated for 60 min at 60 °C; then extracts were centrifuged at room temperature for 2 min at maximum speed. Supernatants were transferred to clean microcentrifuge tubes, to which 400 μl of cold 75% ethanol was added, mixed by inverting the tubes, and incubated at − 20 °C for overnight precipitation. Finally, tubes were centrifuged at 4 °C for 30 min at maximum speed and supernatants were aspirated. Once tubes were dried of residual solution, capsule pellets were suspended in Tris-buffered saline (TBS; 10 mM Tris, 140 mM NaCl, pH 7.4).
Capsular polysaccharides were quantified through colorimetric analysis according to the previously utilized protocol (Brimacombe and Beatty 2013) utilizing a standard calibration curve (Fig. S1). In brief, 200 μl of each extract was swirled with 200 μl of 5% phenol and 1 ml of 93% sulfuric acid. Color was allowed to develop at room temperature for 10 min with subtle swirling every 2–3 min. Optical density (OD490) was then measured, and the concentration of capsular polysaccharides was calculated from the standard curve obtained using serial dilutions of carbohydrate stock (1:1 mixture of 0.5 mg/ml each of sucrose and fructose).
Immunization of mice with capsular polysaccharides
Capsular polysaccharides were used to immunize mice as described previously (Kurbatova et al. 2017) with some modifications. Female BALB/c mice (20–25 gm weight) were SC immunized with capsular polysaccharides supplemented with alum. Mice were dosed 4 times at days 0, 7, 14, and 21, where each mouse received a mixture of 10 µg capsular polysaccharides and 2 mg alum in 200 µl saline per dose. A control group was immunized with alum only. Blood samples were collected at day zero (as a negative control), 14, 21, and 28, to determine the antibody titer in the collected sera using ELISA.
Capsular polysaccharides pool
A pool of equimolar concentrations of the capsular polysaccharides extracted from 3 clinical isolates (No. 51, 63, and 76) was used to immunize female BALB/c mice. Where each mouse received a total of 30 µg capsular polysaccharides (10 µg of capsular polysaccharides of each clinical isolate) and 2 mg alum per dose, at the same time intervals as described previously. Immune sera formed against the pool were isolated at day 28 from the start of immunization protocol to screen their cross-reactivity with all 100 clinical A. baumannii isolates using ELISA.
Pentavalent pool
A pentavalent pool combining both recombinant proteins (Wza and YiaD) and capsular polysaccharides of three clinical A. baumannii isolates was used to immunize female BALB/c mice groups (n = 10/group). Each mouse received a total of 600 µg proteins (300 µg of each recombinant protein) and 30 µg capsular polysaccharides (10 µg of capsular polysaccharides of each clinical isolate) in addition to 2 mg alum per dose, by the same time intervals as mentioned before. Immune sera formed against the pentavalent pool were then used to screen their cross-reactivity with A. baumannii clinical isolates using ELISA.
ELISA-based assessment of serum antibody titer following immunization
Serum antibody titer assessments were performed according to Huang et al. (2016) in the case of recombinant proteins, and according to Kurbatova et al. (2017) in the case of capsular polysaccharides, with minor modifications. Microtitre plates (Maxisorp, Nunc, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) were coated with 100 µl/well of 10 µg/ml of either recombinant proteins (Wza and YiaD) or capsular polysaccharides in coating buffer (15 mM Na2CO3, 35 mM NaHCO3, pH 9.6) and incubated at 4 °C overnight. Residual protein-binding sites were then blocked with 250 µl/well of 1% (w/v) bovine serum albumin (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) in TBS buffer at room temperature. After 2 h, plates were washed three times with 250 µl/well of wash buffer (TBS supplemented with 5 mM CaCl2 and 0.05% Tween 20). Serum samples were serially diluted in TBS with 2 mM CaCl2, added to plates (100 µl/well), and incubated at room temperature for 90 min. Plates were washed once more and bound mouse immunoglobulin (IgG) was determined using alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody and the chromogenic substrate para-nitrophenyl phosphate (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). Finally, absorbance at 405 nm was measured using Microtitre plate reader (Biotek instruments inc., USA).
Screening of cross-reactivity of different immune sera with clinical A. baumannii isolates
ELISA technique was used to determine the cross-reactivity of the immune serum developed against each immunogen (recombinant proteins, capsular polysaccharides, or the pentavalent pool) with A. baumannii clinical isolates. ELISA assays were carried out according to the previously described protocol (Kohl and Ascoli 2017; Bidmos et al., 2018) with minor modifications, where A. baumannii isolates were cultured at 37 °C with shaking at 2000 rpm in LB broth media overnight. The pellets were obtained by centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 10 min and washed 3 times with TBS. Bacteria were then fixed in 0.5% (v/v) formaldehyde in TBS at room temperature for an hour. Following the fixation, cells were washed three times with TBS and then re-suspended in coating buffer. Wells of Microtitre plate were coated with the formalin-fixed A. baumannii suspensions of OD600 = 0.5 in 100 μl aliquots in coating buffer and incubated overnight at 4 °C. Residual protein-binding sites were then blocked with 250 µl/well of 1% (w/v) bovine serum albumin in TBS buffer at room temperature. After 2 h, plates were washed three times with 250 µl/well of wash buffer. Immune serum collected from mice after one week of the last immunization booster dose was diluted to 1/5000 ratio using TBS, added to plates (100 µl/well) and incubated at room temperature for 90 min. Plates were washed again and bound mouse immunoglobulins were determined using alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody and the chromogenic substrate para-nitrophenyl phosphate. Absorbance at 405 nm was measured using Microtitre plate reader.
Bacterial challenge and survival experiments
Firstly, the challenging dose of ATCC 19606 standard strain was determined through injecting female BALB/c mice groups (n = 10/group) intra-peritoneally with different doses of bacteria in LB broth combined with 10% porcine mucin type II (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) as adjuvant in 200 µl inocula. Porcine mucin has been formerly proved to augment the infectivity of A. baumannii and other bacteria in various experimental models, thus allowing us to use smaller inocula (McConnell et al. 2011a, b; McConnell et al. 2011a, b). Each group received a different dose including 1 × 107, 1 × 108, 1 × 109 and finally 5 × 108 colony forming unit (CFU), based on a previously determined relation curve between optical density (OD600) and CFUs. The control group received porcine mucin only. All mice were monitored for clinical signs and disease progression for 7 days.
Immunized, using the same protocol as previously described, and control non-immunized mice (n = 10/group) were then challenged, 1 week after the last immunization, intra-peritoneally with 200 µl inocula (100 µl of 5 × 108 CFU of A. baumannii and 100 µl of 10% porcine mucin). Viable counts were performed to determine the actual numbers of CFUs in the injected inocula. Mice were monitored for clinical signs and disease progression for 7 days (Huang et al. 2014).
Evaluation of bioburden in mice tissues
Tissue bacterial burdens were evaluated as described previously (Ainsworth et al. 2017) with minor modifications. Briefly, spleens, livers, and kidneys from both immunized and control non-immunized groups were collected at 5 different time intervals including 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h post A. baumannii challenge. Tissues were collected from three mice at each time interval in each group and homogenized separately in 2 ml sterile saline. Following that, tenfold serial dilutions were plated on nutrient agar plates using surface-drop viable count technique to estimate bacterial burdens and finally normalized by the tissue weight. Negative control mice tissues were also collected and plated to exclude false results.
Histopathological examination of mice tissues
Livers were collected from immunized and non-immunized control mice at 8, 24, and 48 h post-challenge with A. baumannii isolates, as well as negative control uninfected mice. Tissues were collected from three mice at each time interval in each group, suspended in 2 mL of 10% formalin, fixed in wax of paraffin, sectioned then stained with hematoxylin–eosin (H&E) for histopathological observation. Three sections from each mouse liver tissue were examined for quantitation of leukocyte infiltration rates. Liver sections were examined microscopically in a blind manner and scored by a veterinary pathologist according to the severity and extent of vascular congestion, hepatocellular degeneration, hepatocellular necrosis, polymorphonuclear inflammation, and leukocytes infiltration (Ainsworth et al. 2017).
Statistical analysis
Graph Pad Prism software package (version 6.01) was used to statistically analyze survival experiments using Mantel-Cox log-rank test; with n = 10/group, while multiple t-test was used in the case of bioburden assays where statistical significance was calculated using Holm-Sidak method, with alpha = 5.000%. Unpaired t-test was used to analyze histological variation levels in liver tissues. All results were estimated as the mean of three separate experiments and considered significant when p < 0.05.
Results
Recombinant proteins
Cloning of Wza and YiaD coding sequences into pRSET-B expression vector
Amplicons of 789 bp and 630 bp were obtained following PCR amplification of Wza and YiaD coding sequences, respectively (Fig. 1A) utilizing genomic DNA of standard A. baumannii strain (ATCC 19606) as a template. Successful cloning of coding sequences in the expression vector pRSET-B was confirmed by detecting restriction analysis products of 789 bp or 630 bp and 2900 bp, corresponding to Wza or YiaD and vector, respectively (Fig. 1B).
Expression and purification of Wza and YiaD proteins
Optimal expression of recombinant Wza and YiaD was observed 6 h following induction with IPTG in E. coli BL-21(DE3)pLysS. Following purification, protein bands of 28.89 and 22.49 kDa corresponding to the expected sizes of Wza (Fig. 1C) and YiaD (Fig. 1D), respectively, were observed in SDS-PAGE. Bands of the purified proteins were identified by anti-histidine tagged antibodies following Western blot (Fig. 1C and D).
Immunization with either Wza or YiaD recombinant proteins
Purified recombinant proteins Wza or YiaD were used to immunize groups of BALB/c mice (n = 3/group). Collected sera at different time intervals from both immunized and control mice that received alum only were used to assess the antibody titer following immunization using ELISA. Immunized mice showed a robust increase in antibody titer following each booster dose of immunization, while the control group showed no immune response against Wza or YiaD (Fig. S2A and B, respectively).
For all survival assays, the challenging dose of standard A. baumannii strain (ATCC 19606) was firstly determined. Infectious doses of 1 × 107 and 1 × 108 CFU/mouse of the standard strain were associated with survival rates higher than 40% of the challenged mice. Increasing the infectious dose to 5 × 108 CFU/mouse resulted in a reduction of survival to 20%. A dose of 1 × 109 CFU/mouse was associated with no survivals among all the challenged mice. Survival rate was 100% among control mice that received mucin only (Fig. S3). Therefore, in subsequent survival experiments, mice were challenged with 5 × 108 CFU/mouse corresponding to LD80.
Immunization of mice groups (n = 10/group) with either Wza or YiaD significantly protected mice against the challenging dose (LD80) of the standard ATCC 19606 strain, where Wza or YiaD immunization significantly increased survival to 70% or 60%, respectively, in comparison to 20% in the case of the non-immunized control group (Fig. 2A).
To further evaluate the efficacy of the two recombinant proteins as vaccine candidates against A. baumannii clinical isolates, the ELISA technique was used to determine the cross-reactivity between these clinical isolates and the isolated immune sera containing antibodies formed against each recombinant protein. In the case of Wza immunization, only 2% of isolates showed less than 90% binding (100% in the case of the standard strain) with the antibodies formed against Wza immunogen, while YiaD immunization induced formation of antibodies in immune sera that showed more than 90% binding affinity (100% in the case of the standard strain) with 97% of tested clinical A. baumannii isolates (Fig. 2B).
To confirm these results, each recombinant protein was used to immunize three groups of female BALB/c mice (n = 10/group). Immunized groups were challenged with LD80 of clinical A. baumannii isolates (No. 62, 63, and 100) at day 28 from the immunization protocol beginning. Immunization of mice with Wza recombinant protein protected the challenged mice against clinical isolates No. 62 and No. 100 with 60% survival rate, while failed to protect mice against isolate No. 63 with only 30% survival rate (Fig. 2C). Challenging YiaD immunized mice with clinical isolates No. 62 and No. 100 lead to 60% and 70% survival rates, respectively; however, survival following the challenge with clinical isolate No. 63 was only 10% (Fig. 2D).
Recombinant proteins pool
The two recombinant proteins (Wza and YiaD) were pooled together, in equimolar concentrations, and used as one immunogen. Group of three female BALB/c mice were immunized with the recombinant proteins pool, immune sera were collected at day 28 and used to screen their cross-reactivity with all 100 clinical A. baumannii isolates. ELISA results revealed that 48% of isolates exceeded 90% binding with immune serum (100% in the case of the standard strain), while the remaining 52% of tested clinical isolates showed binding levels of 80% to 90% (Fig. 2E).
Following that, the recombinant proteins pool was used to immunize four groups of mice (n = 10/group). Immunization with the recombinant proteins pool completely protected the challenged mice with 100% survival rate in the case of the standard strain, clinical isolates No. 62 and No. 100. In addition, a 90% survival was observed upon challenging proteins pool immunized mice with the clinical isolate No. 63 (Fig. 2F).
Capsular polysaccharides
Capsular polysaccharides of the standard ATCC 19606 strain
Capsular polysaccharides of A. baumannii ATCC 19606 standard strain were extracted, quantified (Fig. S1), and used to immunize a group of 3 BALB/c mice, where ELISA results revealed a significant increase in antibody titer in immune sera isolated from immunized mice upon injecting booster immunization doses (Fig. S2C). Immunization with the extracted capsular polysaccharides completely protected the challenged mice (n = 10) with 100% survival rate against the standard strain (Fig. 3A). However, ELISA results showed minor antibody cross-reactivity (not exceeding 20% binding) with all tested clinical isolates (Fig. 3B).
Capsular polysaccharides pool
Based on previous ELISA results, the capsular polysaccharides of five A. baumannii clinical isolates (isolates No. 51, 63, 76, 79, and 100) were extracted and quantified. Each of these capsular polysaccharides were used to immunize mice separately (n = 3/group), immune sera were then collected and used to screen their cross-reactivity with the clinical A. baumannii isolates. ELISA results revealed that immune sera formed against capsular polysaccharides of isolates No. 79 and 100 showed no cross-reactivity with all the other tested clinical isolates. However, variable cross-reactivity levels were detected in the case of immunization with capsular polysaccharides of isolates No. 51, 63, or 76 as shown in Fig. 3C. Thus, a pool of equimolar concentrations of the capsular polysaccharides extracted from these clinical isolates (No. 51, 63, and 76) was used to immunize a group of three mice. Immune serum formed against the polysaccharides pool was then used, through ELISA, to screen its cross-reactivity with the clinical A. baumannii isolates. ELISA results revealed 11 clinical isolates had more than 70% binding (100% binding in the case of isolate No. 51), 86% of isolates ranged from 70 to 30% binding, and eventually, only 3 isolates had less than 30% binding (Fig. 3D). Upon challenging immunized mice with the capsular polysaccharides pool, survival rates were 70%, 80%, 80% and 90% for the standard strain, clinical isolates No. 62, 63, and 100 (Fig. 3E), respectively.
Pentavalent pool
Both recombinant proteins and capsular polysaccharides pools were mixed together giving a pentavalent vaccine candidate that was then evaluated in protection against A. baumannii challenge. The new vaccine candidate was evaluated in vivo in mice against the standard strain, in addition to three clinical isolates of A. baumannii (No. 62, 63, and 100). Immune serum from immunized mice with the pentavalent pool showed higher binding than that of the standard strain (100% binding) with seven tested isolates, whereas 71–100% binding was observed with 81% of tested clinical isolates, and 60–70% binding was detected with 12% of tested isolates (Fig. 4A). Immunization with the pentavalent pool completely protected the challenged mice with 100% survival in case of all tested bacterial challenges (Fig. 4B).
Evaluation of bioburden in mice tissues
All immunization trials helped the challenged mice to eliminate bacterial loads in their tissues at all time intervals compared to the control non-immunized group, while no bacterial burdens were detected in the tissues of negative control mice. For immunization using the pool of recombinant proteins (Wza and YiaD), a significant reduction in bioburdens was detected in liver tissues at all time intervals (Fig. 5A), while bacterial burdens in the spleen were significantly lower at 12 h post-challenge of immunized mice (Fig. 5B). In kidneys, bacterial burdens were significantly lower after 8, 12, 24 and 48 h following the bacterial challenge (Fig. 5C).
For the capsular polysaccharides pool, a significant reduction in bioburdens was detected in liver tissues at time intervals of 4, 8, 12, and 48 h post-challenge compared to the control non-immunized mice (Fig. 5D). While in the spleen bacterial burdens were significantly reduced at 12 and 24 h post-challenge (Fig. 5E). In kidneys, bacterial burdens were significantly lower after 8 and 12 h of bacterial challenge compared to non-immunized mice (Fig. 5F).
Immunization with the pentavalent pool assisted mice to significantly reduce the bacterial loads in their liver tissues at all time intervals post their challenge (Fig. 5G). However, bioburdens were significantly lower only after 12 h following the bacterial challenge in spleens of immunized mice compared to the control non-immunized group (Fig. 5H). In kidneys, bacterial burdens were significantly reduced after 8, 12, 24, and 48 h of bacterial challenge (Fig. 5I).
Histopathological examination of mice tissues
Negative control uninfected mice exhibited normal hepatocytes arranged in radiating plates around central vein (CV) with normal portal areas (PA) and sinusoids. No infiltration of leukocytes into different tissue sections was observed. Liver tissues of control non-immunized challenged mice showed severe congestion with perivascular inflammation. Moreover, nuclear vacuolization of hepatocytes with the presence of basophilic bacteria in hepatic sinusoids appeared at 8 h only, following infection. Congestion and perivascular inflammation slightly decreased at 24 and 48 h, post-challenge of mice, accompanied with nuclear pyknosis (Fig. 6A (1)).
Following the challenge of mice immunized with the recombinant proteins pool, liver tissues also exhibited congestion and perivascular inflammation at 8 and 24 h time intervals. The inflammation degree was then decreased at 48 h post-challenge (Fig. 6A (2)). Additionally, the number of leukocyte infiltrate clusters was significantly lower in the case of immunized mice after 48 h post-challenge when compared to the control non-immunized mice (Fig. 6B). Moreover, the percent area of leukocyte infiltrate appeared lower than that in control non-immunized mice at each time interval (Fig. 6C).
In the case of capsular polysaccharides pool immunization, congestion and perivascular inflammation were observed in liver sections after 8 and 24 h of the bacterial challenge; however, the degree of inflammation decreased at 48 h post-infection (Fig. 6A (3)). Additionally, the number of leukocyte infiltrate clusters appeared lower than that in control non-immunized mice at each time interval (Fig. 6B). Moreover, the percent area of leukocyte infiltrate in immunized mice appeared lower than that of the control non-immunized mice at each time interval, however, it was significantly significant at 48 h post-infection (Fig. 6C).
Liver tissues of immunized mice with the pentavalent pool showed mild perivascular inflammation at 8 and 24 h time intervals that subsided at 48 h post-challenge (Fig. 6A (4)). Moreover, leukocyte infiltration rate, represented by both the number of leukocyte infiltrate clusters and the percent area of leukocyte infiltrate, appeared significantly lower than those recorded in any other group, including the control non-immunized mouse group (Fig. 6B and C).
All mice groups (immunized and control non-immunized) showed a significant reduction in leukocyte infiltration rates, represented by both the number of leukocyte infiltrate clusters and the percent area of leukocyte infiltrate, at 48 h post-challenge compared to their values at 8 h time interval (Fig. 6B and C).
Discussion
A. baumannii is considered one of the most virulent and infectious organisms that have an increased ability to both evade host immune response and resist various classes of antibiotics, leading to life-threatening pneumonia and bacteremia (Wong and Nielsen 2017). Moreover, improper use of antibiotics has led to the emergence of MDR and XDR strains where even carbapenems, colistin, tigecycline, and combination antibiotic therapy may not be effective, thus alternative strategies are urgently required (Nowak and Paluchowska 2016). Vaccine development has recently received much attention to protect against A. baumannii. However, as far as we know, there is still no licensed vaccine approved against A. baumannii, where the vast diversity among its strains remains to be the major challenge in the development of an effective vaccine (Gellings and Wilkins 2020; Yang and Lou 2017). Herein, we report the development of a novel pentavalent vaccine candidate composed of two new recombinant proteins (Wza and YiaD) and a pool of capsular polysaccharides isolated from three A. baumannii clinical isolates. Immunization with this vaccine candidate completely protected mice with 100% survival against all tested clinical bacterial isolates.
One of the major virulence determinants of A. baumannii is the presence of OMPs representing feasible targets for immunization. Presence of the dense polysaccharide capsule that might overshadow outer membrane antigens from immune recognition has limited their use as vaccine candidates (Wang-Lin et al. 2017). Nevertheless, identification of the protruding protein portions extending through the capsule to the external environment could overcome that limitation (Gellings and Wilkins 2020). To be an effective vaccine candidate, it should be surface exposed, conserved among different strains of A. baumannii, highly prevalent, immunogenic, and able to illicit a reproducible protective immune response in population (Ahmad and Tawfik 2016). Many in silico prediction tools are currently being used to predict protein epitopes fulfilling vaccine candidate requirements, such as, reverse vaccinology alone or combined with comparative genomic analysis, in vitro proteomic analysis, and immunoproteomics (Chiang et al. 2015; Mujawar et al. 2019).
OmpA family is one of the most conserved OMPs in A. baumannii that has been implicated in bacterial virulence, adhesion, invasion, and interaction with surface receptors on host cells. Members of this family represent very promising vaccine candidates (Ansari et al. 2019). Immunization with OmpA was previously reported to significantly increase the survival rates of mice and decrease bioburdens in their tissues post-challenge with A. baumannii (Luo et al. 2012; Zhang et al. 2016). Interestingly, OmpA family proteins have been formerly reported to be able to induce protective immunity against variable bacteria including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Shigella flexneri, Chlamydia abortus, Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella pneumonia (Ayalew et al. 2011; Hounsome et al. 2011; Jeannin et al. 2002; Lei et al. 2019; Pore and Chakrabarti 2013; Tang et al. 2017). However, OmpA provided insufficient protection levels against A. baumannii increasing the urge to identify additional novel protective antigens (Chen 2015).
The outer membrane protein Wza (formerly known as EpsA) is an OMP that belongs to the capsule biosynthesis gene cluster and is implicated in lipopolysaccharides export (Ahmad and Azam 2018), while YiaD (formerly known as ABAYE2931) is an OMP belonging to OmpA family (Chiang et al. 2015). Both proteins (Wza and YiaD) are antigenic, non-allergen, highly conserved, and strongly activating of both humoral and cell-mediated immunity (Ahmad and Azam 2018; Chiang and Sung 2015). In the present study, we investigated for the first time, as far as we know, the ability of both Wza and YiaD to induce protective immune responses against A. baumannii. From the standard ATCC 19606 strain, we expressed the full-length coding sequence of YiaD; however, in the case of Wza, we only expressed a segment of the coding sequence that contained the antigenic epitope “LQNNTRRMK”. It was previously reported that immunization with the antigenic epitopes only of some proteins, and not the whole protein sequence, may be sufficient to give protection against A. baumannii (Du et al. 2021). Both Wza and YiaD successfully induced significantly high antibody titers following subcutaneous immunization of mice. An exceptional cross-reactivity over 97% with more than 90% of binding was detected between individual immune sera of Wza and YiaD and 100 different clinical isolates using ELISA. Moreover, our in vivo studies proved that active immunization of mice with either recombinant Wza or YiaD alone, significantly protected mice against the invading standard strain with 70% or 60% survival rates, respectively, compared to only 20% in the case of the non-immunized control group. Similarly, it was reported by Singh R and coworkers (2018), that immunizing mice with FilF, an OMP, was associated with 50% protection against the standard ATCC 19606 strain (Singh et al. 2016).
We extended our survival experiments to include 3 representative clinical isolates based on their binding levels with immune sera, where clinical isolates No. 62 and No. 100 showed higher binding than that obtained with the standard strain from which the protein immunogens were derived (more than 100% binding). Binding of clinical isolates No. 62 and No. 100 was similar to binding of 95% and 86% of isolates for Wza and YiaD immune sera, respectively. On the other hand, clinical isolate No. 63 showed less binding degree of 89% and 90%with immune sera against Wza and YiaD, respectively. This binding was similar to 5% and 14% of isolates for Wza and YiaD immune sera, respectively. Immunization with Wza or YiaD was associated with survival rates ranging from 60 to 70% for clinical isolates No. 62 and No. 100. However, neither Wza nor YiaD immunized mice were protected against their challenge with the clinical isolate No. 63. Similar or even higher protection rates (ranging from 50 to 100% survival) were previously reported by other researchers following immunization of mice with other OMPs including OmpA, Omp22, and OmpW against few selected clinical isolates (Huang et al. 2015, 2016; Luo and Lin 2012).
The use of dual-component vaccination strategy has been formerly evaluated and shown to be successful (Bolourchi et al. 2019; Ramezanalizadeh et al. 2020). In one study, OmpA was combined with the secreted serine protease PKF in an antigen cocktail. This cocktail protected mice that showed increased clearance levels of A. baumannii bioburdens and increased survival rate to 85% compared to 80% and 75% survival rates in the case of either PKF or OmpA, respectively (Bolourchi and Shahcheraghi 2019). In another study, combined FimA and CsuA/B acted synergistically on immunized mice leading to increased survival up to 60% compared to FimA (50%) or CsuA/B (35%), when given alone (Ramezanalizadeh and Owlia 2020). Those studies suggested that a cocktail of conserved surface proteins could represent a highly effective vaccine against the majority of A. baumannii clinical isolates. This is not particularly surprising given that there are many FDA-approved multicomponent vaccines on the market today, including the Diphtheria, Tetanus, and Pertussis (DTaP) and Meningitis B (MenB) vaccines (Gellings and Wilkins 2020). In our study, immunization with the recombinant proteins cocktail (Wza and YiaD pool) led to a synergistic immune response that protected immunized mice with survival rates ranging from 90% to even 100% against all tested A. baumannii standard and clinical isolates. Additionally, more than 80% antibody binding was observed between the immune serum of immunized mice with the recombinant proteins pool and all tested clinical isolates. Such a vaccination strategy succeeded to extend the spectrum of protection to include clinical isolate No. 63, where the survival rate in immunized mice reached 90%. Moreover, bioburden levels and the number of leukocyte infiltrate clusters were significantly reduced in immunized mice tissues post-challenge with A. baumannii.
Outer polysaccharide capsules also represented plausible targets for immunization against A. baumannii (Gellings and Wilkins 2020). Passive immunization using monoclonal antibodies against A. baumannii K1 capsular polysaccharide was formerly reported to decrease bacterial burdens in a soft-tissue infection model (Russo and Beanan 2013). Additionally, antibodies against capsular polysaccharides from the drug‐resistant clinical strain SK44 reduced post‐infection bioburdens and provided 55% protection against A. baumannii in a murine pneumonia model (Yang and Lou 2017). However, the vast diversity in capsule composition, with over 100 distinct capsule types identified to date, among A. baumannii populations has hindered its use as a vaccine candidate unless clinicians were able to rapidly identify and target the correct capsule profile (Wyres et al. 2020). Herein, the capsular polysaccharides of the standard ATCC 19606 strain completely protected immunized mice with 100% survival rate against the same standard strain. Even though, the enormous varieties in the composition of capsular polysaccharides among different clinical A. baumannii isolates have limited their cross-reactivity with the immune serum developed against the capsule of the standard strain. To overcome this issue, we tried a pool of capsular polysaccharides prepared from three clinical isolates (No. 51, No. 63, and No. 76) that showed variable similarity degrees in capsule composition with all tested clinical isolates. These similarities were estimated through different levels of cross-reactivity between tested clinical isolates and antisera formed against either each capsule alone or their pool together. Individual capsular polysaccharides from five different clinical isolates were initially tried in immunization, where isolates No. 79 and No. 100 were excluded as no cross-reactivity was observed between their immune sera and the tested clinical isolates. However, variable degrees of cross-reactivity were observed between tested clinical isolates and immune sera of mice that received capsular polysaccharides of either isolate No. 51 or No. 63. Despite the low levels of cross-reactivity, capsular polysaccharides of clinical isolate No. 76 were added in our polysaccharides pool due its cross-reactivity with all uncovered clinical isolates by capsular polysaccharides of either isolate No. 51 or No. 63.
Furthermore, we have evaluated the protective efficacy of the capsular polysaccharides pool in mice. Immunization with this pool has protected the challenged mice with a 70% survival rate against the standard strain and with survival rates ranging from 80 to 90% against all tested clinical isolates (No. 62, No. 63, and No. 100). Moreover, immunization of mice with the capsular polysaccharides pool managed not only to significantly assist mice to clear their tissues from the bacterial loads, but also to significantly decrease inflammation levels, through decreased percent area of the leukocyte infiltrate after 48 h, in their liver tissues compared to the control non-immunized mice. These results were consistent with Russo and coworkers (2013), who reported that immunization using K1 capsular polysaccharide decreased K1-positive strain bioburdens in mice while having no effect on K1-negative strains (Russo and Beanan 2013).
A major drawback of using capsular polysaccharides as vaccine candidates remains to be the T cell-independent immune response, where only B cells are activated (Feldman et al. 2019). Interestingly, combining polysaccharides with recombinant proteins could generate a T cell-dependent antigen, where both B and T cells are involved in the immune response required to generate a successful immune memory (Li et al. 2021). To improve the overall efficacies of the different tested vaccine candidates, we decided to formulate and evaluate a new pentavalent vaccine composed of both recombinant proteins and capsular polysaccharides pools. Surprisingly, the pentavalent pool succeeded to completely protect immunized mice with 100% survival rates against all the tested A. baumannii whether the standard strain or the clinical isolates (No. 62, No. 63, and No. 100). Additionally, the pentavalent pool managed not only to significantly increase the clearance of bacterial loads in immunized mice tissues, but also to significantly reduce inflammation of their liver tissues. It was also observed that the pentavalent pool was superior to other tested pools (either recombinant proteins or capsular polysaccharides pools) regarding decreased inflammation of liver tissues in immunized mice. Both the number of leukocyte infiltrate clusters and the percent area of leukocyte infiltrate were significantly reduced in liver tissues of immunized mice with the pentavalent pool compared to all other mice groups. Interestingly, Li and coworkers (2021) reported the efficacy of such a cocktail of both capsular polysaccharides and recombinant proteins. They showed that a conjugate vaccine formed of capsular polysaccharides of A. baumannii, and the recombinant cholera toxin B subunit (CTB4573C) could protect immunized mice with survival rates ranging from 70 to 100% compared to only 20% and 30% in case of immunization using either CTB or capsular polysaccharides alone. The glycoconjugate vaccine also succeeded to decrease bacterial tissue loads in immunized mice compared to the non-immunized groups (Li and Pan 2021). However, the capsular polysaccharides-CTB conjugate vaccine still needs a further assessment as an immunogen against other clinical A. baumannii isolates, as it was only tested against one standard strain and one clinical A. baumannii isolate.
In our future work, we would recommend the evaluation of our pentavalent pool against other isolates of A. baumannii from different geographic sources worldwide. Throughout our study, we have observed that isolated capsular polysaccharides from the standard ATCC 19606 strain, firstly isolated in the USA (Tsubouchi et al. 2020), were highly variable in composition than those isolated from the clinical isolates that were collected from Egypt. This variability was confirmed by low levels of cross-reactivity between the immune serum of mice that received capsular polysaccharides of the standard strain alone, and all tested clinical isolates, suggesting that A. baumannii capsules could respond differently according to their geographical source and surrounding environmental conditions. However, immunized mice with the polysaccharides pool were protected following the challenge with the standard strain despite the absence of the standard strain polysaccharides from the immunizing polysaccharides pool.
In summary, for the first time, we introduced several new promising vaccine candidates against A. baumannii infections, including two recombinant proteins Wza and YiaD, a pool of both Wza and YiaD, a pool of three capsular polysaccharides, and a pentavalent pool of Wza, YiaD, and three capsular polysaccharides. Combining both recombinant proteins and capsular polysaccharides in our currently investigated pentavalent pool has managed to overcome the disadvantages of using either of them alone, and has enhanced the overall vaccine efficacy. This novel pentavalent vaccine candidate managed to completely protect immunized mice against challenges with all tested A. baumannii including the standard ATCC 19606 strain and the clinical isolates. This was coupled with a significant reduction in bioburden and inflammation levels in tissues of immunized mice compared to non-immunized control mice.
Data availability
All data generated and analyzed during this study are included in this article and its supplementary information files.
References
Ahmad S, Azam SS (2018) A novel approach of virulome based reverse vaccinology for exploring and validating peptide-based vaccine candidates against the most troublesome nosocomial pathogen: Acinetobacter baumannii. J Mol Graph Model 83:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmgm.2018.04.020
Ahmad TA, Tawfik DM, Sheweita SA, Haroun M, El-Sayed LH (2016) Development of immunization trials against Acinetobacter baumannii. Trials Vaccinol 5:53–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trivac.2016.03.001
Ahmad S, Ranaghan KE, Azam SS (2019) Combating tigecycline resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: a leap forward towards multi-epitope based vaccine discovery. Eur J Pharm Sci 132:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2019.02.023
Ainsworth S, Ketter PM, Yu JJ, Grimm RC, May HC, Cap AP, Chambers JP, Guentzel MN, Arulanandam BP (2017) Vaccination with a live attenuated Acinetobacter baumannii deficient in thioredoxin provides protection against systemic Acinetobacter infection. Vaccine 35:3387–3394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.05.017
Almansoor A (2017) Development of vaccine conjugates based on Dengue virus using a staphylococcal immune evasion protein. Dissertation, University of Bath, England
Ansari H, Tahmasebi-Birgani M, Bijanzadeh M, Doosti A, Kargar M (2019) Study of the immunogenicity of outer membrane protein A (ompA) gene from Acinetobacter baumannii as DNA vaccine candidate in vivo. Iran J Basic Med Sci 22:669. https://doi.org/10.22038/ijbms.2019.30799.7427
Ayalew S, Shrestha B, Montelongo M, Wilson AE, Confer AWJC (2011) Immunogenicity of Mannheimia haemolytica recombinant outer membrane proteins serotype 1-specific antigen, OmpA, OmpP2, and OmpD15. Clin Vaccine Immunol 18:2067–2074.https://doi.org/10.1128/CVI.05332-11
Ayoub Moubareck C, Hammoudi Halat D (2020) Insights into Acinetobacter baumannii: A review of microbiological, virulence, and resistance traits in a threatening nosocomial pathogen. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) 9:119–122. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9030119
Benmahmod AB, Said HS, Ibrahim RH (2019) Prevalence and mechanisms of carbapenem resistance among Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates in Egypt. Microb Drug Resist 25:480–488. https://doi.org/10.1089/mdr.2018.0141
Bidmos FA, Nadel S, Screaton GR, Kroll JS, Langford PR (2018) Cross-reactive bactericidal antimeningococcal antibodies can be isolated from convalescing invasive Meningococcal disease patients using reverse vaccinology 2.0. Front Immunol 16:9–1621. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.01621
Bolourchi N, Shahcheraghi F, Shirazi AS, Janani A, Bahrami F, Badmasti F (2019) Immunogenic reactivity of recombinant PKF and AbOmpA proteins as serum resistance factors against sepsis of Acinetobacter baumannii. Microb Pathog 131:9–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2019.03.031
Brimacombe CA, Beatty JT (2013) Surface polysaccharide extraction and quantification. Bio-protocol 3:e934-e. https://doi.org/10.21769/BioProtoc.934
Cerqueira GM, Peleg AY (2011) Insights into Acinetobacter baumannii pathogenicity. IUBMB Life 63:1055–1060. https://doi.org/10.1002/iub.533
Chen W (2015) Current advances and challenges in the development of Acinetobacter vaccines. Hum Vaccin Immunother 11:2495–2500. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2015.1052354
Chiang MH, Sung WC, Lien SP, Chen YZ, Lo AF, Huang JH, Kuo SC, Chong P (2015) Identification of novel vaccine candidates against Acinetobacter baumannii using reverse vaccinology. Hum Vaccin Immunother 11:1065–1073. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2015.1010910
Dijkshoorn L, Nemec A, Seifert H (2007) An increasing threat in hospitals: multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Nat Rev Microbiol 5:939–951. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1789
Du X, Xue J, Jiang M, Lin S, Huang Y, Deng K, Shu L, Xu H, Li Z, Yao J, Chen S, Shen Z, Feng G (2021) A multiepitope peptide, rOmp22, encapsulated in Chitosan-PLGA nanoparticles as a candidate vaccine against Acinetobacter baumannii Infection. Int J Nanomedicine 16:1819–1836. https://doi.org/10.2147/ijn.s296527
Elhosseiny NM, Attia AS (2018) Acinetobacter: an emerging pathogen with a versatile secretome. Emerg Microbes Infect 7:33. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41426-018-0030-4
Feldman MF, Mayer Bridwell AE, Scott NE, Vinogradov E, McKee SR, Chavez SM, Twentyman J, Stallings CL, Rosen DA, Harding CM (2019) A promising bioconjugate vaccine against hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116:18655–18663. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1907833116
Garcia-Quintanilla M, Pulido MR, McConnell MJ (2013) First steps towards a vaccine against Acinetobacter baumannii. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 14:897–902. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389201014666131226123511
Geisinger E, Huo W, Hernandez-Bird J, Isberg RR (2019) Acinetobacter baumannii: envelope determinants that control drug resistance, virulence, and surface variability. Annu Rev Microbiol 73:481–506. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-micro-020518-115714
Gellings PS, Wilkins AA, Morici LA (2020) Recent advances in the pursuit of an effective Acinetobacter baumannii Vaccine. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9121066
Girgis MM, El-Aziz AMA, Hassan R, Ali YM (2020) Immunization with proline rich region of pneumococcal surface protein A has no role in protection against Streptococcus pneumoniae serotype 19F. Microb Pathog 138:103761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2019.103761
Harding CM, Hennon SW, Feldman MF (2018) Uncovering the mechanisms of Acinetobacter baumannii virulence. Nat Rev Microbiol 16:91–102. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro.2017.148
Huang W, Yao Y, Wang S, Xia Y, Yang X, Long Q, Sun W, Liu C, Li Y, Chu X, Bai H, Yao Y, Ma Y (2016) Immunization with a 22-kDa outer membrane protein elicits protective immunity to multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Sci Rep 6:20724. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20724
Hosseingholi EZ, Rasooli I, Gargari SL (2014) In silico analysis of Acinetobacter baumannii phospholipase D as a subunit vaccine candidate. Acta Biotheor 62:455–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-014-9226-8
Hounsome JD, Baillie S, Noofeli M, Riboldi-Tunnicliffe A, Burchmore RJ, Isaacs NW, Davies RL (2011) Outer membrane protein A of bovine and ovine isolates of Mannheimia haemolytica is surface exposed and contains host species-specific epitopes. Infect Immun 79:4332–4341. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.05469-11
Huang W, Yao Y, Long Q, Yang X, Sun W, Liu C, Jin X, Chu X, Chen B, Ma Y (2014) Immunization against multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii effectively protects mice in both pneumonia and sepsis models. PLoS One 9:e100727. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100727
Huang W, Wang S, Yao Y, Xia Y, Yang X, Long Q, Sun W, Liu C, Li Y, Ma Y (2015) OmpW is a potential target for eliciting protective immunity against Acinetobacter baumannii infections. Vaccine 33:4479–4485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.07.031
Jeannin P, Magistrelli G, Goetsch L, Haeuw JF, Thieblemont N, Bonnefoy JY, Delneste Y (2002) Outer membrane protein A (OmpA): a new pathogen-associated molecular pattern that interacts with antigen presenting cells-impact on vaccine strategies. Vaccine 20(Suppl 4):A23–A27. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0264-410x(02)00383-3
Kasimova AA, Shneider MM, Arbatsky NP, Popova AV, Shashkov AS, Miroshnikov KA, Balaji V, Biswas I, Knirel YA (2017) Structure and gene cluster of the K93 capsular polysaccharide of Acinetobacter baumannii B11911 containing 5-N-Acetyl-7-N-[(R)-3-hydroxybutanoyl]pseudaminic acid. Biochemistry Mosc 82:483–489. https://doi.org/10.1134/s0006297917040101
Kohl TO and Ascoli CA (2017) Direct and indirect cell-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 5:402–407. https://doi.org/10.1101/pdb.prot093732
Kroger C, Kary SC, Schauer K, Cameron AD (2016) Genetic regulation of virulence and antibiotic resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii. Genes 8:12. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes8010012
Kurbatova EA, Akhmatova NK, Akhmatova EA, Egorova NB, Yastrebova NE, Sukhova EV, Yashunsky DV, Tsvetkov YE, Gening ML, Nifantiev NE (2017) Neoglycoconjugate of tetrasaccharide representing one repeating unit of the Streptococcus pneumoniae type 14 capsular polysaccharide induces the production of opsonizing IgG1 antibodies and possesses the highest protective activity as compared to hexa- and octasaccharide conjugates. Front Immunol 8:659. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.00659
Lee CR, Lee JH, Park M, Park KS, Bae IK, Kim YB, Cha CJ, Jeong BC, Lee SH (2017) Biology of Acinetobacter baumannii: pathogenesis, antibiotic resistance mechanisms, and prospective treatment options. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 7:55. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2017.00055
Lei L, Yang F, Zou J, Jing H, Zhang J, Xu W, Zou Q, Zhang J, Wang X (2019) DNA vaccine encoding OmpA and Pal from Acinetobacter baumannii efficiently protects mice against pulmonary infection. Mol Biol Rep 46:5397–5408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-019-04994-2
Li X, Pan C, Liu Z, Sun P, Hua X, Feng E, Yu Y, Wu J, Zhu L, Wang H (2021) Safety and immunogenicity of a new glycoengineered vaccine against Acinetobacter baumannii in mice. Microb Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13770
Luo G, Lin L, Ibrahim AS, Baquir B, Pantapalangkoor P, Bonomo RA, Doi Y, Adams MD, Russo TA, Spellberg B (2012) Active and passive immunization protects against lethal, extreme drug resistant-Acinetobacter baumannii infection. PLoS One 7:e29446. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029446
Martins M, McCusker MP, Viveiros M, Couto I, Fanning S, Pages JM, Amaral L (2013) A simple method for assessment of MDR bacteria for over-expressed efflux pumps. Open Microbiol J 7:72–82. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874285801307010072
McConnell MJ, Domínguez-Herrera J, Smani Y, López-Rojas R, Docobo-Pérez F, Pachón J (2011a) Vaccination with outer membrane complexes elicits rapid protective immunity to multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Infect Immun 79:518–526. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.00741-10
McConnell MJ, Rumbo C, Bou G, Pachón J (2011b) Outer membrane vesicles as an acellular vaccine against Acinetobacter baumannii. Vaccine 29:5705–5710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.06.001
McConnell MJ, Actis L, Pachon J (2013) Acinetobacter baumannii: human infections, factors contributing to pathogenesis and animal models. FEMS Microbiol Rev 37:130–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2012.00344.x
Mellick AS, Rodgers L (2007) Lab ref: a handbook of recipes, reagents, and other reference tools for use at the bench. Cold Spring Harbor, New York
Moriel DG, Beatson SA, Wurpel DJ, Lipman J, Nimmo GR, Paterson DL, Schembri MA (2013) Identification of novel vaccine candidates against multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. PLoS One 8:e77631. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077631
Morris FC, Dexter C, Kostoulias X, Uddin MI, Peleg AY (2019) The mechanisms of disease caused by Acinetobacter baumannii. Front Microbiol 10:1601. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01601
Mujawar S, Mishra R, Pawar S, Gatherer D, Lahiri C (2019) Delineating the plausible molecular vaccine candidates and drug targets of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 9:203. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2019.00203
Nowak P, Paluchowska P (2016) Acinetobacter baumannii: biology and drug resistance - role of carbapenemases. Folia Histochem Cytobiol 54:61–74. https://doi.org/10.5603/FHC.a2016.0009
Piperaki ET, Tzouvelekis LS, Miriagou V, Daikos GL (2019) Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: in pursuit of an effective treatment. Clin Microbiol Infect 25:951–957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2019.03.014
Pore D, Chakrabarti MK (2013) Outer membrane protein A (OmpA) from Shigella flexneri 2a: a promising subunit vaccine candidate. Vaccine 31:3644–3650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.05.100
Qamsari MM, Rasooli I, Chaudhuri S, Astaneh SDA, Schryvers AB (2020) Hybrid antigens expressing surface loops of ZnuD from Acinetobacter baumannii is capable of inducing protection against infectionFront Immun 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.00158
Ramezanalizadeh F, Owlia P, Rasooli I (2020) Type I pili, CsuA/B and FimA induce a protective immune response against Acinetobacter baumannii. Vaccine 38:5436–5446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.06.052
Russo TA, Beanan JM, Olson R, MacDonald U, Cox AD, Michael FS, Vinogradov EV, Spellberg B, Luke-Marshall NR, Campagnari AA (2013) The K1 capsular polysaccharide from Acinetobacter baumannii is a potential therapeutic target via passive immunization. Infect Immun 81:915–922. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.01184-12
Said HS, Benmahmod AB, Ibrahim RH (2018) Co-production of AmpC and extended spectrum beta-lactamases in cephalosporin-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in Egypt. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 34(12):189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-018-2571-z
Shlaes DM, Bradford PA (2018) Antibiotics-from there to where?: how the antibiotic miracle is threatened by resistance and a broken market and what we can do about it. Pathog Immun 3:19–43. https://doi.org/10.20411/pai.v3i1.231
Singh R, Garg N, Shukla G, Capalash N, Sharma P (2016) Immunoprotective efficacy of Acinetobacter baumannii outer membrane protein, FilF, predicted in silico as a potential vaccine candidate. Front Microbiol 7:158. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00158
Singh JK, Adams FG, Brown MH (2018) Diversity and function of capsular polysaccharide in Acinetobacter baumannii. Front Microbiol 9:3301. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.03301
Skariyachan S, Taskeen N, Ganta M, Venkata Krishna B (2019) Recent perspectives on the virulent factors and treatment options for multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Crit Rev Microbiol 45:315–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/1040841x.2019.1600472
Sun J, Zhang H, Liu YH, Feng Y (2018) Towards understanding MCR-like colistin resistance. Trends Microbiol 26:794–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2018.02.006
Tang X, Wang H, Liu F, Sheng X, Xing J, Zhan W (2017) Outer membrane protein A: an immunogenic protein induces highly protective efficacy against Vibrio ichthyoenteri. Microb Pathog 113:152–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2017.10.043
Tipton KA, Rather PN (2019) Extraction and visualization of capsular polysaccharide from Acinetobacter baumannii. Methods Mol Biol (Clifton, NJ) 1946:227–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9118-1_21
Tsubouchi T, Suzuki M, Niki M, Oinuma KI, Niki M, Kakeya H, Kaneko Y (2020) Complete genome sequence of Acinetobacter baumannii ATCC 19606(T), a model strain of pathogenic bacteria causing nosocomial infection. Microbiol Resour Announc 9. https://doi.org/10.1128/mra.00289-20
Wang-Lin SX, Olson R, Beanan JM, MacDonald U, Balthasar JP, Russo TA (2017) The capsular polysaccharide of Acinetobacter baumannii is an obstacle for therapeutic passive immunization strategies. Infect Immun 85. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.00591-17
Wong D, Nielsen TB, Bonomo RA, Pantapalangkoor P, Luna B, Spellberg B (2017) Clinical and pathophysiological overview of Acinetobacter infections: a century of challenges. Clin Microbiol Rev 30:409–447. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00058-16
Wyres KL, Cahill SM, Holt KE, Hall RM, Kenyon JJ (2020) Identification of Acinetobacter baumannii loci for capsular polysaccharide (KL) and lipooligosaccharide outer core (OCL) synthesis in genome assemblies using curated reference databases compatible with Kaptive. Microb Genom 6. https://doi.org/10.1099/mgen.0.000339
Yang FL, Lou TC, Kuo SC, Wu WL, Chern J, Lee YT, Chen ST, Zou W, Lin NT, Wu SH (2017) A medically relevant capsular polysaccharide in Acinetobacter baumannii is a potential vaccine candidate. Vaccine 35:1440–1447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.01.060
Zhang X, Yang T, Cao J, Sun J, Dai W, Zhang L (2016) Mucosal immunization with purified OmpA elicited protective immunity against infections caused by multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Microb Pathog 96:20–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2016.04.019
Acknowledgements
The standard strain ATCC 19606 was kindly provided by Reham Samir, Assistant Professor of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Egypt. We are also grateful to Walaa F. Awadine, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mansoura University, Egypt (35516), for excellent Histopathological examinations throughout our study.
Funding
Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB). This study was self-funded.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The study was conceived and designed by RH, HIK, and HSS. Experimental work was performed by YAH who also prepared and analyzed data. YAH wrote the initial manuscript. RH, HIK, and HSS have revised the manuscript and analyzed the data. All authors contributed to data analysis, interpretation, and writing/revision of the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
All animal procedures were performed according to the ethical guidelines for investigations in laboratory animals and were approved by the Ethical Committee of the Faculty of Pharmacy, Mansoura University, Egypt (Code number: 2021–284), in accordance with “Principles of Laboratory Animal Care” (NIH publication No. 85–23, revised 1985).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Hagag, Y.A., Said, H.S., Kenawy, H.I. et al. A novel pentavalent vaccine candidate completely protects against Acinetobacter baumannii in a mouse model of peritonitis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 106, 8151–8167 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-022-12231-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-022-12231-3