Abstract
Microbial pesticides form critical components of integrated pest management (IPM) practices. Little, however, is known regarding the impacts of these organisms on the indigenous microbial community. We show that Metarhizium anisopliae strain CQMa421 was highly effective in controlling the rice leafroller, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenee. In addition, M. anisopliae distribution and its effects on phyllosphere microbial diversity after application in field trials were investigated. Phylloplane specific distribution of the fungus was observed over time, with more rapid declines of M. anisopliae CFUs (colony-forming units) seen in the top leaf layer as compared to lower layers. Application of the fungus resulted in transient changes in the endogenous microbial diversity with variations seen in the bacterial observed species and Shannon index. Notable increases in both parameters were seen at 6-day post-application of M. anisopliae, although significant variation within sample replicates for bacteria and fungi were noted. Application of M. anisopliae increased the relative distribution of bacterial species implicated in plant growth promotion and organic pollutant degradation, e.g., Methylobacterium, Sphingobium, and Deinococcus. These data show minimal impact of M. anisopliae on endogenous microbial diversity with transient changes in bacterial abundance/diversity that may result in added benefits to crops.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The use of microbes is increasingly being recognized as a viable option for insect control. Over 50 different genera of entomopathogenic viruses, bacteria, fungi, and nematodes are currently commercially available and are being used as part of integrated pest management practices (IPM) (Glare et al. 2012; Lacey et al. 2015). Interest in the use of these organisms has grown as few new chemical pesticides are being approved and increased health concerns prompt regulatory restrictions on synthetic chemical pesticides (Ansell 2008; Bielza et al. 2008; Marx-Stoelting et al. 2011). However, widespread adoption and use of microbial biological control agents, especially in agriculture and for staple crops, remains lagging in part due to issues of cost and effectiveness. In addition, little is known concerning the effects of foliar application of the significant numbers of microbial cells needed for effective pest control on indigenous microbial communities.
Entomopathogenic fungi play a crucial natural ecological role in controlling insect populations (Roberts and St Leger 2004; Gillespie and Claydon 2006). Most insect pathogenic fungi belong to the orders Entomophthorales and Hypocreales (Hussain et al. 2014). Presently, over 7000 isolates of insect-pathogenic fungi, mostly Metarhizium and Beauveria spp., are available and can service as mycoinsecticides targeting over several hundred different insect pests worldwide (Hussain et al. 2014; Lacey et al. 2015). Although a wide range of formulations have been developed, most contain one of several infectious propagules including aerial conidia, blastospores, or in the case of some Metarhizium spp., sclerotia (Mascarin and Jaronski 2016; Wraight et al. 2016). A number of environmental and ecological considerations have also been considered, particularly non-target effects on beneficial insects and indigenous microbes and persistence issues (Hajek and Goettel 2007; Babendreier et al. 2015; Lacey et al. 2015). As agricultural applications require dispersal of the fungal agent on plants where indigenous microbial communities, resident within the phyllosphere exist, an examination of the effects of the fungus on these communities is important. Persistence of the biological agent after application also affects the efficacy of target pest control (Collins et al. 2003).
Phyllosphere microbiota are highly diverse and include many different bacteria, filamentous fungi and yeasts, algae, and various protists and other single-celled eukaryotes (Lindow and Brandl 2003). The phyllosphere community composition is dependent upon a wide range of factors, including the plant species, temperature, humidity, nutrient availability (on the plant surface), sun/UV exposure levels, and even the underlying soil geochemistry (Lindow and Leveau 2002). Some phyllosphere microbes are beneficial to plants, e.g., are involved in nitrogen fixation, act as barriers to the growth of plant pathogens, facilitate the acquisition of nutrients, and/or act to degrade or eliminate harmful pollutants (Kvasnikov et al. 1974; Murty 1984; Hirano and Upper 2000; Krechel et al. 2002; Krimm et al. 2005; Schreiber et al. 2005; Sandhu et al. 2007). However, resident phyllosphere microbes also include plant pathogens that upon favorable conditions can result in plant disease. Farming practices often dramatically alter phyllosphere microbial populations, including increasing the levels of some human pathogens, ultimately compromising food safety (Henis and Bashan 1986; Lindow and Leveau 2002). Ideally, agricultural practices that seek to limit insect pests should also be compatible with efforts to limit harmful microbes while promoting the growth and/or activities of beneficial ones.
Rice is a worldwide staple food, consumed almost daily by more than 1 billion people in China alone, where more than 30% of the world’s rice production occurs (Yang et al. 2008; Knief et al. 2012). Chemical pesticides are important tools for protecting rice harvests from a wide variety of insect pests. However, many chemical pesticides have unwanted environmental effects including altering the composition of microorganisms within the phyllosphere, potentially decreasing those beneficial to plants and/or increasing harmful ones (Lal and Saxena 1982; Zhang et al. 2009). Use of chemical pesticides may decrease microbial biomass due to direct toxicity (Ko and Lockwood 1986), but in some cases may increase microbial biomass due to the active and/or inert ingredient acting as a nutrient source selecting for specific microbes (Chinalia and Killham 2006). A number of studies have assessed the effects of chemical pesticides on microbial communities in a range of environments (Salonlus 1972; Walter et al. 2007; Vig et al. 2008; Moulas et al. 2013), and in some instances, indirect effects, e.g., decreases in microbial predator populations, or only minor effects, have been reported (Pandey and Chauhan 2007). Regarding the latter, strawberry phyllosphere microbiota were not greatly affected by application of the bacterium, Bacillus subtilis (Wei et al. 2016), and no significant effects were observed on fungal and bacterial communities of strawberry leaves after application of the fungal agents Aureobasidium pullulans or Beauveria bassiana (Sylla et al. 2013).
In this study, we investigated the pest control efficacy, distribution, and effects on phyllosphere microbiota in field trials of Metarhizium anisopliae (CQMa421) applied as a foliar spray targeting the rice leafroller, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenee. Phyllosphere microbial diversity and community structure were examined during the reproductive (booting, ~52 days after sowing) stage of rice (Oryza sativa). Microbial diversity was probed using next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology of the V4 hypervariable region of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene for bacterial identification and the rRNA first internal transcribed spacer (ITS1) region for fungal identification (Fierer et al. 2012; Edwards et al. 2015; Prober et al. 2015).
Materials and methods
Cultivation of fungi and field trials
M. anisopliae var. anisopliae strain CQMa421 (strain accession number: CGMCC NO. 460) used in the field trials was provided by the Genetic Engineering Research Center, College of Life Science at Chongqing University, China. Application of M. anisopliae strain CQMa421 in oil miscible suspension formulation (8 × 1010 spores/ml) was prepared as described (Peng et al. 2008). Briefly, mycelia were first produced in a liquid fermentation reactor and then inoculated into autoclaved rice with 40–50% water in volume for producing conidia. Conidia were harvested after 15 days of growth, allowed to air-dry, and suspended in soybean oil. The fungal oil miscible suspension formulation was made by mixing the soybean-M. anisopliae oil formulation to the indicated dilution with a mixture comprising 40% water, 56% soybean oil, and 4% (v/v) mixed emulsifiers (Span-80 and Tween-20). The formulation was thoroughly mixed at high speed in a beater. The concentration of the M. anisopliae oil formulation was adjusted to 8 × 1010 spores/ml by serial dilution and verified by spore counting using a Petroff–Hausser counting slide. Field trail experiments were performed in plots separated by nylon net cages (80 mesh, 5–10% shade) 180 cm in height. The experimental plot was located at the Genetic Engineering Research Center, Chongqing University, China. Rice-germinated shoots (~800 O. sativa subsp. QU5, obtained from Chongqing Academy of Agricultural Science) were planted in six 15 m2 plots with line width of 30 cm × 40 cm on April 13, 2015. The experiment was performed as a randomized complete block in a split–split plot design with three replications. During the growth phase, the daily air temperature high ranged from 30.4 to 38.1 °C (mean 34.5 °C), the average relative air humidity was approximately 90%, and illumination time ranged between 0 and 11.8 h in the field (mean 6.5 h). Plants were watered and fertilized in accordance to local grower practices, including addition of urea (5 kg/120 m2) as a fertilizer during the early plant tillering stage. Any visible weeds were removed by hand before M. anisopliae was applied, and hand weeding was performed once more during the study period.
M. anisopliae application and bioassays for C. medinalis
M. anisopliae spores prepared as indicated above were applied to treatment plots and the oil miscible formulation lacking any fungal spores was applied to control plots when rice leaf rolls with C. medinalis larvae appeared (typically during the later period of rice tillering). M. anisopliae was applied to treatment plots at the rate of 2.5 ml of formulated product mixed 200 ml sterile water per plot. All plots were checked every 3 days after M. anisopliae treatment. Time points included 0 day before application and 3, 6, 9, and 12 days after M. anisopliae applied. A five-point sampling mode per plot was performed, and two rice clumps per point were checked. The effect of M. anisopliae on the leafroller rice pest was assessed via examination of the number of new leaf rolls as this represents the phenotypic consequence of the insect on the rice leaf, i.e., insect activity results in a characteristic rolling of the leaves. Two ratios were measured: (1) percentage of new leaf rolls (%) and (2) survival rate of C. medinalis (%). The percentage of new leaf rolls (%) was calculated by measuring [total new leaf rolls in a rice clump 3 days after the previous sampling time point]/[total leaf in the rice clump at the sampling time point]. The survival rate of C. medinalis (%) was calculated by measuring [total C. medinalis in a rice clump at the sampling time point]/[total new leaf rolls in the rice clump 3 days after the previous sampling time point].
M. anisopliae persistence in the rice phyllosphere
Before sample collection for microbiome assessment, M. anisopliae persistence was surveyed in the plots. Time points included 0 day within 2 h post-application, and 3, 6, 9, and 12 days after M. anisopliae application. There was no rain during the sampling period. For each sample, 30 whole rice leaves per plot were sheared with sterile scissors and placed in a plastic Ziplock bag (24 cm × 35 cm). Sections of the rice leaves were isolated using a sterilizing punch (1 cm2), and samples were placed in 50 ml Erlenmeyer flasks containing 30 ml of 0.05% (v/v) Tween-80 solution. The suspension was shaken (250 rpm) for 20 min at room temperature, and then placed in an ultrasonic cleaning bath (Shanghai Kudos Instrument Co. Shanghai, China) for 2 min. Serial dilutions of the suspension were plated using a spiral plater onto selective media [one fourth SDAY media amended with 0.2 g/L chloramphenicol (Solarbio. Beijing, China) and 0.05 g/L dodine (Sigma-Aldrich. St. Louis, MO)]. Plates were incubated in complete darkness at 28 °C for 4 days. M. anisopliae colonies were identified, and the number of colony forming units (CFUs/cm2) was assessed.
Sample collection of microbial community assessment in the rice phyllosphere
For each plot, about 200 g of the upper, middle, and bottom sections of the rice leaf was cut and immediately placed into sterile polythene bags (approximate time of collection ~6 pm for all samples). Samples were immediately transported to the laboratory (less than a half of hour) and further processed within 24 h. For each sample (treatments and controls), the entirety of the 200 g of leaf material was aseptically transferred into a Ziplock bag (24 cm × 35 cm) containing 500 ml sterile precooled TE-buffer (10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.5) supplemented with 0.05% Tween-80. Leaf surfaces were washed to collect the microbial population from the leaf material by 5 min (each step) of (1) shaking, (2) vortexing, and (3) sonication of the samples in the TE-buffer with the Ziplock bag kept in ice water (~4 °C) for each processing step. The cell suspension was separated from the leaf material by filtration through a sterile nylon mesh. Sonication was performed at a frequency of 40 kHz in an ultrasonic cleaning bath (Shanghai Kudos Instrument Co. Shanghai, China) to dislodge the microbes from leaf surface. Cell suspensions (after filtration) were placed in six 100-ml tubes/sample, and cells were pelleted via centrifugation at 3150×g for 15 min at 4 °C (Delmotte et al. 2009). Cell pellets from multiple tubes were pooled into 1.5-ml reaction tubes and washed twice with TE-buffer with Tween-80. Cell pellets were immediately frozen at −80 °C until DNA extraction.
DNA extraction
DNA extraction was performed using the E.Z.N.A.TM Soil DNA Kit (Omega, Norcross, GA) as described (Knief et al. 2012) with slight modifications. Frozen cell pellets were resuspended in 1 ml of kit-supplied SLX Mlus buffer with 500 mg of glass beads, and cell lysis was performed at 65 Hz for 90 s. The cell debris suspension was immediately processed using procedures according to the instructions in the kit manual. Finally, total DNA was obtained from the column by two sequential elutions with 100 μL elution buffer.
16S rRNA gene V4 and ITS1 amplification, quantification, and sequencing
A total of 54 rice leaf samples corresponding to sections derived from the top, middle, and bottom of the rice leaf layers and over a time course (0 day, within 2 h, and 6 and 12 days, post-application of M. anisopliae) were collected from three separate treatment plots and three blank control plots were collected. Sequencing of the V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene was performed for bacterial identification, and the first internal transcribed spacer (ITS1) region of the rRNA operon was used for fungal identification (Fierer et al. 2012; Edwards et al. 2015; Prober et al. 2015). Briefly, 35 cycles of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of the target marker genes was performed. Error-correcting 12-bp barcoded primers specific to each sample were used to permit multiplexing of samples (David et al. 2014; Edwards et al. 2015). PCR products from all samples were quantified using the PicoGreen dsDNA assay, and pooled together in equimolar concentrations. Each library was submitted to BGI (Shenzhen, China), for 250 × 250 paired end, dual index sequencing on an Illumina MiSeq instrument. Illumina sequence reads have been deposited under the NCBI SRA accession number SRP096089.
Sequence analysis
The sequences obtained from the MiSeq runs were demultiplexed using a custom Python script with quality filtering (Edgar 2013). The sequences were overlapped to form contiguous reads using MOTHUR’s command make.contigs (Schloss et al. 2009). Sequences were dereplicated and singleton sequences were removed prior to phylotype determination. The sequences were then clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) by UCLUST (Edgar 2010) based on 97% pairwise identity using QIIME’s open reference OTU picking strategy that used the Greengenes 13_5 database and UNITE(v20140703) for 16S and ITS rRNA sequences, respectively (Edgar 2013). Taxonomic classification of the representative sequence for each OTU was done using QIIME’s version of the Ribosomal Database Project’s classifier against the Greengenes 16S rRNA database (13_5 release) and UNITE: Version 6 20140910 (Abarenkov et al. 2010; Cole et al. 2009). All OTUs identified as belonging to chloroplast or mitochondria were removed from the dataset. The representative sequences for each OTU were aligned using PyNAST in QIIME (Caporaso et al. 2010). Chimeric OTUs were identified using QIIME’s implementation of ChimeraSlayer and removed from the OTU table and OTU representative sequences file (Haas et al. 2011).
Statistical analysis
The percentage of new leaf rolls caused by C. medinalis was used to assess the biopesticide activity of M. anisopliae, and the data was subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) for a completely randomized design. Analysis of data from the M. anisopliae population (log10[CFUs/cm2]) and sampling date was performed using the General Linear Model (GLM) procedure to describe the relationship (Prober et al. 2015; Ruiz-Gonzalez et al. 2015). OTU tables for each experiment were normalized by the trimmed mean of M values (TMM) method using the BioConductor package EdgeR in R (Robinson et al. 2010). Rarified OTU subsets were generated to calculate the alpha diversity in QIIME. Species richness with observed species index and species diversity using the Shannon index were used to indicate α-diversity in the R package Vegan (Oksanen et al. 2007). To uncover whether the α-diversity index was significantly influenced by M. anisopliae, application time and leaf layer position, Sobs and Shannon indexes were examined through multivariate analysis of variance and linear mixed model fitted by maximum likelihood (Prober et al. 2015; Hong et al. 2016). Weighted and unweighted UniFrac distances were calculated from the normalized OTU tables for each experiment (Lozupone and Knight 2005). To explore the bacterial and fungal similarities and differences between samples, ANOVA tests were performed on the weighted and unweighted UniFrac distances matrix and used to determine whether the weighted and unweighted UniFrac distances among samples were significantly different between control and treatment samples (Koren et al. 2012). All statistical tests were two-tailed and were conducted in SPSS 17.0 software (SPSS Inc. Chicago, USA). Data are presented by mean ± SE. The significance level of all analyses was set at 0.05, except when specified.
Biomarker analyses
A linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) algorithm (Segata et al. 2011) was used to test significant associations between bacterial or fungi taxa and groups (control vs M. anisopliae applied). The LEfSe algorithm was used to discover biomarkers (genes, pathways, or taxa) of different sample groups employing the linear discriminant analysis to approximate the effect size of each biomarker identified. A significant association between bacterial or fungal clades and a specific group can be detected when there is consistently higher relative abundance of the clade in the group’s samples.
Results
Control of C. medinalis by M. anisopliae strain CQMa421
In order to assess the ability of M. anisopliae to control the rice leafroller, the effect of the fungus on C. medinalis was measured 3, 6, 9, and 12 days after foliar spray application in field conditions (Fig. 1). A single foliar spray was performed using an ultralow volume sprayer at a rate of 2.5 ml of formulated product mixed 200 ml sterile water per plot on rice seedlings ~52 days after planting (late tillering stage) as detailed in the “Materials and methods” section. Plots of ~45 m2 were treated with fungal spores, corresponding to ~300 rice seedlings. Similar sized control plots were treated with the spray solution lacking any fungal spores. Both the percentage of leaf rolls caused/made by C. medinalis (Fig. 1a) and the survival rate of C. medinalis (%) (Fig. 1b) significantly declined compared to control plots. As compared to controls, new leaf rolls decreased between 40 and 70% in treated plots, 3 and 12-day post-M. anisopliae application, respectively. These data were in good agreement with decreases seen in C. medinalis survival that dropped to 5% in M. anisopliae treated plots, while remaining >25% in control treated plots (Fig. 1b).
Spatial and temporal distribution of M. anisopliae in the rice phyllosphere after application
Two methods were used to assess the spatial and temporal distribution of M. anisopliae in the rice field plots after foliar spray. These included plating and counting of recoverable CFUs from leaf samples and quantification of the M. anisopliae ITS sequencing signal. The GLM procedure was performed to describe the relationship between data from the M. anisopliae population (log10[CFUs/cm2]) and sampling date. A steady decline in the population density as measured by recoverable CFUs, i.e., (log10[CFUs/cm2]), of M. anisopliae over the 12-day study period was observed (Fig. 2). At the initial time point after application (2 h), spore concentrations for the top, middle, and bottom regions of the rice plant were 4.13, 2.23, and 1.04 (×103 [CFUs/cm2]), respectively (Fig. 2a). After 3 days, these levels were reduced to 0.33, 0.33, and 0.22 (×103 [CFUs/cm2]), and by 12 days, M. anisopliae levels had decreased to 0.14, 0.94, and 1.81 CFUs/cm2, at the different foliar levels, respectively (Fig. 2a). The greatest rate of reduction was seen at the top rice leaf layer, with similar decline rates seen for the middle and bottom rice leaf layers (Fig. 2b, p < 0.001). The rate of decline of recoverable M. anisopliae was 3.75 (log10[CFUs/cm2]) at the top leaf layer, and 2.83 (log10[CFUs/cm2]) and 2.31 (log10[CFUs/cm2]) for the middle and lower leaf layer regions, respectively (Fig. 2b). Although the population density in the top leaf layer at the initial time point was higher than the others (reflecting the dispersal and distribution of the fungal spores due to the spray mode of application), as the rate of CFU loss was also higher, by the last time point examined (12 days), few M. anisopliae CFUs could be detected in this layer. Relative abundance was also monitored via ITS1 of the rRNA operon as detailed in the “Materials and methods” sections (Fig. 2c). These data were in general agreement with the recoverable CFU results, showing relative mean abundances of 53.6, 47.32, and 22.21% at 2 h for the top, middle, and bottom rice phyllosphere sampling levels, which decreased to 4.85, 12.66, and 9.77% by 12 days.
Microbiota structure in the rice phyllosphere
In total, 54 samples were collected corresponding to three time points (0-, 6-, and 12-day post-application of M. anisopliae) and three rice phyllosphere levels (top, middle, and bottom). Samples were barcoded and pooled for sequencing. Sequencing generated datasets consisting of 1,527,013 and 1,706,024 16S and ITS1 rRNA reads for each target region, respectively. Chloroplast sequences were removed from the bacterial dataset. Relative abundance of M. anisopliae sequences ranged from 1.15 to 55.23% in the different samples (Supplemental Fig. S1). As mentioned above, the highest levels of M. anisopliae were found at the 0 day top leaf (mean 53.6%) and the lowest at 12-day top leaf (mean 4.85%) (Fig. 2c and Supplemental Fig. S1). Sequences corresponding to M. anisopliae signals were removed from the fungal dataset for further analyses. Filtered 16S and ITS sequence reads were then analyzed by PyNAST (Python Nearest Alignment Space Termination) alignment at a threshold of 97% sequence identity. In the resultant analyses, 1,420,259 bacterial and 1,408,872 fungal sequences were grouped into 1026 and 453 OTUs, respectively.
Analyses of the 16S rRNA dataset indicated the dominance of the phylum Proteobacteria, comprising ~90% of the bacterial diversity observed across all samples in the rice phyllosphere examined, irrespective of M. anisopliae application (Fig. 3a). The remaining bacteria were distributed in the phyla Actinobacteria, Acidobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Thermi. Within the Proteobacteria, the major bacterial classes observed were Alphaproteobacteria (18% of the total Proteobacteria), Betaproteobacteria (9%), Gammaproteobacteria (60%), and Deltaproteobacteria (0.5%). Within the Gammaproteobacteria, the genera Acinetobacter (11% of the total), Pantoea (19%), and Pseudomonas (10%) appeared to predominate. However, ~30% of the bacterial OTU sequences could not be assigned to known bacterial genera. Significant variation was seen among different time points, and at this level of analyses, no significant differences were found between M. anisopliae applied samples and control ones based on relative abundance (Fig. 3a). Analyses of absolute abundance were performed to ensure that the relative abundances were not biased due to potential changes in absolute levels of identified OTUs (Supplemental Fig. S2a). These analyses revealed no significant changes in absolute levels.
Analyses of the fungal ITS1 rRNA dataset revealed the predominance of the phylum Basidiomycota (63%) followed by members of the phylum Ascomycota (36%) across all samples (Fig. 3b). At the class level, within Basidiomycota, OTUs belonging to the Ustilaginomycetes were the most predominant (62% of the total Basidiomycetes sequences), with Dothideomycetes (18%) and Sordariomycetes (17%), the major represented OTUs within Ascomycota. For the fungal analyses, the absolute abundances of Ustilaginomycetes and Sordariomycetes seen in the M. anisopliae treatment group significantly decreased relative to the control at each time points (Supplemental Fig. S2b; p < 0.05). With respect to the relative fungal abundance analyses, significant variation was noted between the various time points (Fig. 3b).
Effects of M. anisopliae application on microbial diversity
In order to determine whether species richness and diversity were affected by M. anisopliae, multivariate analyses of variance on the dataset was performed on various microbial (Alpha) diversity indices including the observed species index and the Shannon index. The observed species index is used to estimate microbial species richness, and the Shannon index involves the calculation of species diversity as determined by species richness (number of different species present) and evenness (relative abundance of different species) (Schloss et al. 2009 and Tan et al. 2015). These analyses indicated that the bacterial observed species and the bacterial Shannon indices were significantly affected by application of M. anisopliae, the time point considered after application, and the leaf layer sample position (Tables 1 and 2, p < 0.01; Table 3, p < 0.01). This output was confirmed by modeling to a linear mixed model (Table 3, p < 0.01). However, there was only a significant interactive effect detected in the bacterial Shannon index for the M. anisopliae (Ma) × time post-Ma application comparison (Table 3, p < 0.01). In this case, both overall bacterial species and the bacterial Shannon index increased over the time course of the experiment (from 0- to 6- to 12-day post-Ma application; Supplemental Fig. S3a). The phylloplane position of the rice plant, i.e., the top, middle, and bottom layer, also significantly affected bacterial diversity (Table 1, p < 0.01; Table 3, p < 0.01). Comparison of the top, middle, and bottom layers revealed a significant decrease from the bottom to middle and to the top in both bacterial species and the Shannon indices (Table 1; Supplemental Fig. S3a). In terms of overall bacterial alpha diversity, most of the samples in which M. anisopliae applied were similar to control treatment in terms of the number of observed species and the Shannon diversity indices (Supplemental Fig. S3a). However, the observed species at the top-leaf layer sample (6 days) and the Shannon diversity index of the bottom-leaf layer sample (6 days) post-M. anisopliae application were significantly higher than controls (Supplemental Fig. S3a, p < 0.05).
The distribution of fungal species and the fungal Shannon index were found to be significantly affected by the rice leaf layer, i.e., between the top, middle, and bottom-regions of the rice leaf (Table 2, p < 0.05; Table 4, p < 0.05). Both overall fungal species detected and the fungal Shannon index significantly decreased from the bottom rice leaf level to the middle level, and then to the top rice leaf level (Tables 2 and 4; Supplemental Fig. S3b). Application of M. anisopliae also significantly affected the observed fungal species (Table 2, p < 0.05), an effect that varied depending on time post-application. The fungal Shannon index progressively increased when comparing 0- to 6- and 12-day post-M. anisopliae treatment (Table 2, p < 0.05; Table 4, p < 0.05; Supplemental Fig. S3b). The observed fungal species and fungal Shannon diversity of the top rice–leaf layer sample at 0 day of post-M. anisopliae application were significantly lower than controls; however, the observed fungal species and fungal Shannon diversity at other time-points and phylloplane position were similar to blank controls (Supplemental Fig. S3b).
Effects of M. anisopliae application on microbial community
To explore how application of M. anisopliae impacted the microbial community structure of the rice phyllosphere, we compared the similarity of weighted (unweighted) UniFrac distances between treatment and control groups (Koren et al. 2012). Although there are some slight fluctuations in individual variation in the community composition for bacteria and fungi between the different leaf layers and sampling time (Supplemental Fig. S4), no significant differences were found between M. anisopliae application and controls in these analyses, suggesting no significant effect of M. anisopliae (CQMa421) on community structure of rice phyllosphere microbes.
Biomarker analysis
In order to more robustly identify features that are statistically different among biological classes, the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) (Segata et al. 2011) algorithm was employed to identify specific taxa responding to M. anisopliae application as compared to control groups in the bacterial and fungal taxa over the time course of the experiment. These data revealed that for the bacterial taxa, during the 6-day time course, six predominant phenotypes at the class level were identified as high-dimensional biomarkers for separating phyllosphere bacteria seen in M. anisopliae treated samples compared to controls (Fig. 4a). Five of these classes (i.e., Actinobacteria, Cytophagia, Alphaproteobacteria, Deltaproteobacteria, and Deinococci) showed increased representation in M. anisopliae treated samples, with one (Gammaproteobacteria) lower in the treated samples. At the genus level, seven predominant phylotypes (i.e., Spirosoma, Methylobacterium, Sphingobium, Sphingomonas, Aquabacterium, Cystobacter, Deinococcus) were found at high representation, in the M. anisopliae 6-day post-treatment sample as compared to controls, although the overall most predominant genera (Pseudomonas) were lower in the M. anisopliae treated 6-day samples as compared to control groups. However, this difference was not seen in analyses of the 12-day samples (Supplemental Fig. S5). At the species level, Sphingomonas yabuuchiae was found to be higher in the M. anisopliae 6-day treated group at all leaf layer positions relative to the control (Fig. 4a).
Analyses of the fungal taxa at 6 days revealed Ascomycota and Basidiomycota as the major phyla/divisions (Fig. 4b). Overall, the families Ustilaginaceae (Basidiomycota, order Ustilaginales) and Davidiellaceae (Ascomycota, order Capnodiales) showed increased representation in M. anisopliae treated samples, with Trichosphaeriaceae (Ascomycota, order Trichosphaeriales) lower in treated samples. At the genus level, three predominant phylotypes—Cladosporium, Pseudocercospora (Ascomycota: Capnodiales) and Strelitziana (Ascomycota: Chaetothyriales)—were elevated in the M. anisopliae (6-day post-treatment) as compared to controls, while Nigrospora (Ascomycota: Trichosphaeriales) showed a decrease in M. anisopliae 6-day post-treatment samples (Fig. 4b). Strelitziana albiziae was only found to be higher in the M. anisopliae 6-day treated groups than control ones at the species level. We also identified high-dimensional biomarkers at 12 days (Supplemental Fig. S6). These analyses showed a slight increase in Aspergillus flavus, the predominant species, after M. anisopliae application (relative distribution ~0.02 vs 0.01%, respectively; p > 0.05, metastats test).
Discussion
Despite extensive studies on fungal insect pathogens and the many reports on their potential for agricultural biological control, widespread adoption of entomogenous fungi as part of routine agricultural practices remains lagging (Glare et al. 2012). Recent additional environmental roles for many of these fungi including functioning as plant endophytes, acting as antagonists of plant pathogens, forming associations in the rhizosphere, and possibly even helping in plant growth promotion continue to indicate that these agents are viable alternatives to chemical pesticides (Vega et al. 2009; Ownley et al. 2010; Behie et al. 2012). M. anisopliae has been applied for the control of forestry and agriculture pests (Remadevi et al. 2010), and a number of field trials evaluating entomopathogenic fungi against rice pests have been reported (Karthiba et al. 2010; Jia et al. 2013; Golshan et al. 2013; Lee et al. 2015; Silva et al. 2015). However, the distribution of M. anisopliae in the rice phyllosphere after application and any effects on endemic microbial populations has yet to be reported. These latter aspects are important as any changes in soil and plant microbes can have unanticipated effects on crop health and productivity.
In this report, we have examined the pest control efficacy and environmental fate of M. anisopliae (CQMa421) after foliar application, and measured any effects of the fungus on plant microbial populations across the rice phyllosphere, i.e., at the top, middle, and bottom layers of the growing plant. Our data revealed significant variation and only relatively subtle shifts in the bacterial and fungal populations within the examined 12-day window after application of the fungal agent. The ability of M. anisopliae to control the rice leaf roller C. medinalis was confirmed, and our data are comparable to what has been reported for control of this rice pest using the related insect pathogenic fungus, B. bassiana (B2) (Sivasundaram et al. 2008; Karthiba et al. 2010).
Although a high spore density was detected immediately after application, the population density of M. anisopliae spores rapidly decreased in the various rice phylloplane sections examined, i.e., the top, middle, and bottom leaf layers of the plant. The most rapid decline was seen in the top leaf layer where M. anisopliae CFUs could hardly be detected by day 12. The rate of decline in M. anisopliae recovery from the middle and bottom layers was somewhat lower; however, by day 12, similar levels were seen in all samples. The more rapid decline at the top leaf layer may be consistent with greater exposure to solar irradiation. Although Metarhizium spp. have been found persist and adapt to the soil and plant rhizosphere after application, overall numbers decrease immediately after application and appear to stabilize somewhat over time (St Leger 2008; Tiago et al. 2014). These studies focused on the soil and plant roots, whereas we report on M. anisopliae persistence in leaf layers. A potential reservoir of M. anisopliae may exist as the fungus can colonize internal tissues of certain plants. In Brassica napus, M. anisopliae has been reported in the plant tissues, from where it is subsequently capable of infecting Plutella xylostella larvae feeding on the plants (Batta 2013). However, M. anisopliae spores were shown to survive less than 3 days when applied on maize leaves, a finding that differs from persistence in the soil, where the fungus could still be detected 15 months after application (Pilz et al. 2011). In this study, we measured the relative abundance of M. anisopliae over a time course after application using recoverable CFUs and sequencing. Although semi-quantitative, we found that M. anisopliae could survive at least 12 sdays in the rice leaf, albeit significantly decreasing in titer within this time frame. Somewhat variable results have been reported in other studies. Owing to the lateral shading provided by the adjacent canopy of the top leaf layer, B. bassiana conidial viability on the melon, Cucumis melo leaf undersides remained robust, decreasing only ~9–11% per day (Jaronski 2010). In the upper leaf layer of the melon, a 47% daily decrease in B. bassiana conidial recovery after application has been reported (Jaronski 2010). Our analyses included both a DNA-based technique that could potentially detect DNA from dead or non-viable fungal cells in the phyllosphere as well as direct plating of samples, demonstrating a good correlation between these two approaches. Possible reasons for the decrease in M. anisopliae population in our samples include the strong solar radiation and high temperatures that occur in the long hot summers of Chongqing, China, and our results that are consistent with a few previous studies in similar conditions (Rastogi et al. 2012; Ortiz-Urquiza et al. 2015). Overall, our data indicate a restricted persistence of M. anisopliae (CQMa421) in the rice phyllosphere. However, despite the decrease in CFU/ITS-based sequence recovery across the rice phyllosphere, control of C. medinalis remained robust over the time course examined. These findings imply that low levels of the fungal agent after the initial high titer application may be sufficient for pest control and further research examining the ecological mechanisms behind this are warranted.
In terms of the microbial community, our data revealed that members of the Proteobacteria were the most abundant bacterial phyla detected across all the rice leaf samples. Metagenome analyses have been used to identify bacterial community members at high taxonomic resolution (Knief et al. 2012). However, some variations have been noted between uses of different experimental methodologies. Phyllosphere bacterial diversity was found to have relatively higher proportions of Alphaproteobacteria and Actinobacteria based on metagenome datasets, whereas mainly Alphaproteobacteria was highly represented in metaproteome datasets (Knief et al. 2012). In the rice phyllosphere, based on our 16S rRNA analyses, Gammaproteobacteria were found to be the dominant class in rice phyllosphere, similar to results reported for lettuce (Williams and Marco 2014). With respect to fungal biodiversity, the phyllosphere of grapevine (Perazzolli et al. 2014) and strawberry (Wei et al. 2016), Ascomycota and Basidiomycota were the most abundant fungal phyla, as also seen in our data for the rice phyllosphere by the analysis of barcoded pyrosequencing of the first internal transcribed spacer (ITS1) region of the rRNA operon. However, no obvious changes in the most abundant bacterial and fungal phyla were seen between M. anisopliae treated and untreated samples. These data suggest little to no significant (long term, i.e., >1 month) effects of application of M. anisopliae (CQMa421) on the dominant microbial taxa found in the rice phyllosphere.
Our data show that M. anisopliae application slightly impacted bacteria diversity and community composition during the first 6 days in the booting stage of rice growth, whereas no significant changes in fungal diversity occurred after application. Not too surprisingly, regardless of M. anisopliae application, the bottom rice leaf layers, and to a lesser extent, the middle layer contained greater diversity than the top layer. The effect of M. anisopliae on bacterial diversity on the bottom layer was most noticeable at the 6-day time point, in which the diversity was increased. Little to no effects of B. subtilis treatment on microbial diversity was seen in the strawberry phyllosphere (Wei et al. 2016); however, significant changes were reported in the pepper phyllosphere after application of chemical insecticides (Moulas et al. 2013). Increases in bacterial abundance and a shift in community composition within the pepper plant phyllosphere following application of cypermethrin have also been reported (Zhang et al. 2009). In the present study, increased diversity of bacterial species was found only in the top rice leaf layer at 6-day post-application, and an increased bacterial Shannon Index was seen for the rice leaf bottom layer at 6-day post-M. anisopliae application. These results indicate that M. anisopliae application may result in only transient changes in the bacteria microbiota associated with the rice plant leaves. This difference may result from its restricted persistence in rice leaf and are consistent with a previous study in maize leaves (Batta 2013). Similarity of weighted (unweighted) UniFrac distances between groups can be used to explore the extent to which microbial community phylogeny varies (Koren et al. 2012). By measuring weighted (unweighted) UniFrac distances for bacteria and fungi, we found no obvious difference, again likely due to the restricted distribution and persistence of M. anisopliae.
At deeper classification levels, there were a few microbial species that were significantly affected by M. anisopliae application, primarily occurring at the 6-day post-application time point. Several of these “biomarker” species that increased post-M. anisopliae application appeared to be microorganisms beneficial to crops and/or animals/mammals, and included members corresponding to Aquabacterium, Sphingobium, Sphingomonas, and Methylobacterium. A number of these (e.g., Aquabacterium, Sphingobium, and Sphingomonas) have previously been found to be able to degrade organic pollutants, a potential useful outcome (Nagata et al. 2010; Tang et al. 2013; Wilson et al. 2016). Some species of Methylobacterium and Pseudomonas are also plant growth-promoting or display antagonistic effects against plant pathogens, and hence increases in their levels may facilitate plant disease resistance and/or stress response (Naureen et al. 2009; Luo et al. 2011; Spence et al. 2014). At the species level, S. yabuuchiae, an organic pollutant degrading strain (Park et al. 2015), was more highly represented in the M. anisopliae application group as compared to control ones.
In terms of fungal biodiversity, a number of potential biomarker members were found to have a higher relative distribution at the 6-day post-M. anisopliae application. These included members related to Cladosporium (Bensch et al. 2012), Pseudocercospora (Crous et al. 2013), and S. albiziae (Crous et al. 2010). A lower distribution of members of the Nigrospora genus was seen for the 6-day post-M. anisopliae application. Across the whole experimental period, however, no consistent fungal biomarker genera/species could be identified that could discriminate between M. anisopliae application and control plots, suggesting minimal effects on the overall fungal microbial community of the rice phyllosphere. Only A. flavus was detected as a potential high-dimensional biomarker on day 12 post-M. anisopliae application. This strain may be an opportunistic animal and/or human pathogen (Amaike and Keller 2011); however, its relative distribution was small and only slightly higher after M. anisopliae application (0.02 vs 0.01%).
In summary, our data indicate a rapid decrease in overall fungal spore counts within several days after application, with effective control of the rice leafroller, C. medinalis, during the critical stage when the rice seedling is most vulnerable to the rice pest. Although alternations in the abundance of rice phyllosphere microbiota, and observed species and Shannon index of bacteria, were noted after M. anisopliae application, clear changes were difficult to discern due to large variations, and any effects appeared to be transient. A number of potential bacterial and fungal biomarkers were identified and longer-term studies are needed to better understand any additional effects. Our results support a conclusion that M. anisopliae strain (CQMa421) can control the rice pest and represent an “environmental friendly biopesticides” in that little to no changes or adverse effects towards resident microbial populations are likely to result from its application.
References
Abarenkov K, Nilsson RH, Larsson K, Alexander IJ, Eberhardt U, Erland S, Høiland K, Kjøller R, Larsson E, Pennanen T, Sen R, Taylor AF, Tedersoo L, Ursing BM, Vrålstad T, Liimatainen K, Peintner U, Kõljalg U (2010) The UNITE database for molecular identification of fungi—recent updates and future perspectives. New Phytol 186(2):281–285. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03160.x
Amaike S, Keller NP (2011) Aspergillus flavus. Annu Rev Phytopathol 49:107–133. doi:10.1146/annurev-phyto-072910-095221
Ansell C (2008) Pesticide regulation in the EU and California. UC Berkeley, Institute of Governmental Studies. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/7h47100
Babendreier D, Jeanneret P, Pilz C, Toepfer S (2015) Non-target effects of insecticides, entomopathogenic fungi and nematodes applied against western corn rootworm larvae in maize. J Appl Entomol 139:457–467. doi:10.1111/jen.12229
Batta YA (2013) Efficacy of endophytic and applied Metarhizium anisopliae (Metch.) Sorokin (Ascomycota: Hypocreales) against larvae of Plutella xylostella L. (Yponomeutidae: Lepidoptera) infesting Brassica napus plants. Crop Prot 44:128–134. doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2012.11.001
Behie SW, Zelisko PM, Bidochka MJ (2012) Endophytic insect-parasitic fungi translocate nitrogen directly from insects to plants. Science 336(22):1576–1577. doi:10.1126/science.1222289
Bensch K, Braun U, Groenewald JZ, Crous PW (2012) The genus Cladosporium. Stud Mycol 72:1–401. doi:10.3114/sim0003
Bielza P, Denholm I, Sterk G, Leadbeater A, Leonard P, Jørgensen LN (2008) Declaration of Ljubljana—the impact of a declining European pesticide portfolio on resistance management. Outlooks Pest Manag 19(6):246–248. doi:10.1564/19dec03
Caporaso JG, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, DeSantis TZ, Andersen GL, Knight R (2010) PyNAST: a flexible tool for aligning sequences to a template alignment. Bioinformatics 26(2):266–267. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp636
Chinalia FA, Killham KS (2006) 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) biodegradation in river sediments of Northeast-Scotland and its effect on the microbial communities (PLFA and DGGE). Chemosphere 64:1675–1683. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.01.022
Cole JR, Wang Q, Cardenas E, Fish J, Chai B, Farris RJ, Kulam-Syed-Mohideen AS, McGarrell DM, Marsh T, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM (2009) The ribosomal database project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 37(suppl 1):D141–D145. doi:10.1093/nar/gkn879
Collins DP, Jacobsen BJ, Maxwell B (2003) Spatial and temporal population dynamics of a phyllosphere colonizing Bacillus subtilis biological control agent of sugar beet Cercospora leaf spot. Biol Control 26:224–232
Crous PW, Groenewald JZ, Shin HD (2010) Strelitziana albiziae. Fungal Planet 25:133–134 http://www.fungalplanet.org/content/pdf-files/FP56.pdf
Crous PW, Braun U, Hunter GC, Wingfield MJ, Verkley GJM, Shin HD, Nakashima C, Groenewald JZ (2013) Phylogenetic lineages in Pseudocercospora. Stud Mycol 75:37–114. doi:10.3114/sim0005
David LA, Maurice CF, Carmody RN, Gootenberg DB, Button JE, Wolfe BE, Ling AV, Sloan Devlin A, Varma Y, Fischbach MA, Biddinger SB, Dutton RJ, Turnbaugh PJ (2014) Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nature 505:559–563. doi:10.1038/nature12820
Delmotte N, Knief C, Chaffron S, Innerebner G, Roschitzki B, Schlapbach R, Mering CV, Vorholt JA (2009) Community proteogenomics reveals insights into the physiology of phyllosphere bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:16428–16433. doi:10.1073/pnas.0905240106
Edgar RC (2010) Search and clustering orders of magnitude 186 faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26(19):2460–2461. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461
Edgar RC (2013) UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat Methods 10(10):996–998. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2604
Edwards J, Johnson C, Santos-Medellín C, Lurie E, Podishetty NK, Bhatnagar S, Eisen JA, Sundaresan V (2015) Structure, variation, and assembly of the root-associated microbiomes of rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 20:E911–E920. doi:10.1073/pnas.1414592112
Fierer N, Leff JW, Adams BJ, Nielsen UN, Bates ST, Lauber CL, Owens S, Gilbert JA, Wall DH, Caporaso JG (2012) Cross-biome metagenomic analyses of soil microbial communities and their functional attributes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:626–631. doi:10.1073/pnas.1215210110
Gillespie AT, Claydon N (2006) The use of entomogenous fungi for pest control and the role of toxins in pathogenesis. Pest Manag Sci 27(2):203–215. doi:10.1002/ps.2780270210
Glare TR, Caradus J, Gelernter W, Jackson T, Keyhani N, Köhl J, Marrone P, Morin L, Stewart A (2012) Have biopesticides come of age? Trends Biotechnol 30:250–258. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.01.003
Golshan H, Saber M, Majidi-Shilsar F, Bagheri M, Mahdavi V (2013) Effects of common pesticides used in rice fields on the conidial germination of several isolates of entomopathogenic fungus, Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin. J Entomol Res Soc 15(1):17–22
Haas BJ, Gevers D, Earl AM, Feldgarden M, Ward DV, Giannoukos G, Ciulla D, Tabbaa D, Highlander SK, Sodergren E, Methé B, DeSantis TZ, Human Microbiome Consortium, Petrosino JF, Knight R, Birren BW (2011) Chimeric 16S rRNA sequence formation and detection in Sanger and 454-pyrosequenced PCR amplicons. Genome Res 21(3):494–504. doi:10.1101/gr.112730.110
Hajek AE, Goettel MS (2007) Guidelines for evaluating effects of entomopathogens on non-target organisms. In: Lacey LA, Kaya HK (eds) Field manual of techniques in invertebrate pathology. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 815–833. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5933-9_40
Henis Y, Bashan Y (1986) Epiphytic survival of bacterial leaf pathogens. In: Fokkema NJ, Heuvel J (eds) Microbiology of the phyllosphere. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 252–268
Hirano SS, Upper CD (2000) Bacteria in the leaf ecosystem with emphasis on Pseudomonas syringae—a pathogen, ice nucleus, and epiphyte. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 64:624–653 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10974129
Hong MS, Wei W, Yang ZS, Yuan SB, Yang XY, Gu XD, Huang F, Zhang ZJ (2016) Effects of timber harvesting on Arundinaria spanostachya bamboo and feeding-site selection by giant pandas in Liziping Nature Reserve, China. For Ecol Manag 373:74–80. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2016.04.039
Hussain A, Rizwan-ul-Haq M, Al-Ayedh HY, Al-Jabr AM (2014) Mycoinsecticides: potential and future perspective. Recent Pat Food Nutr Agric 6:45–53. doi:10.2174/2212798406666140613113905
Jaronski ST (2010) Ecological factors in the inundative use of fungal entomopathogens. BioControl 55:159–185. doi:10.1007/s10526-009-9248-3
Jia Y, Zhou JY, He JX, Du W, Bu YQ, Liu CH, Dai CC (2013) Distribution of the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana in rice ecosystems and its effect on soil enzymes. Curr Microbiol 67:631–636. doi:10.1007/s00284-013-0414-6
Karthiba L, Saveetha K, Suresh S, Raguchander T, Saravanakumar D, Samiyappan R (2010) PGPR and entomopathogenic fungus bioformulation for the synchronous management of leaffolder pest and sheath blight disease of rice. Pest Manag Sci 66:555–564. doi:10.1002/ps.1907
Knief C, Delmotte N, Chaffron S, Stark M, Innerebner G, Wassmann R, von Mering C, Vorholt JA (2012) Metaproteogenomic analysis of microbial communities in the phyllosphere and rhizosphere of rice. ISME J 6:1378–1390. doi:10.1038/ismej.2011.192
Ko W, Lockwood JL (1986) Conversion of DDT to DIDD in soil and the effect of these compounds on soil microorganisms. Can J Microbiol 14:1069–1073. doi:10.1139/m68-180
Koren O, Goodrich JK, Cullender TC, Spor A, Laitinen K, Bäckhed HK, Gonzalez A, Werner JJ, Angenent LT, Knight R, Bäckhed F, Isolauri E, Salminen S, Ley RE (2012) Host remodeling of the gut microbiome and metabolic changes during pregnancy. Cell 150:470–480. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.07.008
Krechel A, Faupel A, Hallmann J, Ulrich A, Berg G (2002) Potato-associated bacteria and their antagonistic potential towards plant-pathogenic fungi and the plant-parasitic nematode Meloidogyne incognita (Kofoid & White) Chitwood. Can J Microbiol 48:772–786. doi:10.1139/w02-071
Krimm U, Abanda-Nkpwatt D, Schwab W, Schreiber L (2005) Epiphytic microorganisms on strawberry plants (Fragaria ananassa cv. Elsanta): identification of bacterial isolates and analysis of their interaction with leaf surfaces. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 53:483–492. doi:10.1016/j.femsec.2005.02.004
Kvasnikov EI, Kliushnikova TM, Nagornaia SS (1974) The nitrogen fixing ability of yeasts isolated from the rhizosphere and phyllosphere of plants. Mikrobiolohichnyĭ 36:790
Lacey LA, Grzywacz D, Shapiro-Ilan DI, Frutos R, Brownbridge M, Goettel MS (2015) Insect pathogens as biological control agents: back to the future. J Invertebr Pathol 132:1–41. doi:10.1016/j.jip.2015.07.009
Lal R, Saxena DM (1982) Accumulation, metabolism, and effects of organochlorine insecticides on microorganisms. Microbiol Res 46:95–127
Lee SJ, Yu JS, Nai YS, Parker BL, Skinner M, Kim JS (2015) Beauveria bassiana sensu lato granules for management of brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens in rice. BioControl 60:263–270. doi:10.1007/s10526-014-9632-5
Lindow SE, Brandl MT (2003) Microbiology of the phyllosphere. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:1875–1883. doi:10.1128/AEM.69.4.1875-1883.2003
Lindow SE, Leveau JH (2002) Phyllosphere microbiology. Curr Opin Biotechnol 13:38–43
Lozupone C, Knight R (2005) UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 71(12):8228–8235. doi:10.1128/AEM.71.12.8228-8235.2005
Luo F, Wang Y, Zeng Q, Yan R, Zhang ZB, Zhu D (2011) Diversity and plant growth promoting activities of the cultivable rhizo-bacteria of Dongxiang wild rice (Oryza rufipogon). Biodivers Sci 19(4):476–484. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1003.2011.09002
Marx-Stoelting P, Pfeil R, Solecki R, Ulbrich B, Grote K, Ritz V, Banasiak U, Heinrich-Hirsch B, Moeller T, Chahoud I, Hirsch-Ernst KI (2011) Assessment strategies and decision criteria for pesticides with endocrine disrupting properties relevant to humans. Reprod Toxicol 31:574–584. doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2011.02.003
Mascarin GM, Jaronski ST (2016) The production and uses of Beauveria bassiana as a microbial insecticide. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 32:177. doi:10.1007/s11274-016-2131-3
Moulas C, Petsoulas C, Rousidou K, Perruchon C, Karas P, Karpouzas DG (2013) Effects of systemic pesticides imidacloprid and metalaxyl on the phyllosphere of pepper plants. BioMed Res Int. doi:10.1155/2013/969750
Murty MG (1984) Phyllosphere of cotton as a habitat for diazotrophic microorganisms. Appl Environ Microbiol 48(4):713–718 http://aem.asm.org/content/48/4/713.full.pdf+html
Nagata Y, Ohtsubo Y, Endo R, Ichikawa N, Ankai A, Oguchi A (2010) Complete genome sequence of the representative γ-hexachlorocyclohexane-degrading bacterium Sphingobium japonicum UT26. J Bacteriol 192(21):5852–5853. doi:10.1109/TNS.2004.843095
Naureen Z, Price AH, Hafeez FY, Roberts MR (2009) Identification of rice blast disease-suppressing bacterial strains from the rhizosphere of rice grown in Pakistan. Crop Prot 28:1052–1060. doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2009.08.007
Oksanen J, Kindt R, Legendre P, O’Hara B, Stevens MHH (2007) The vegan package. Community ecology package. http://r-forge.r-project.org/projects/vegan
Ortiz-Urquiza A, Luo ZB, Keyhani NO (2015) Improving mycoinsecticides for insect biological control. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99:1057–1068. doi:10.1007/s00253-014-6270-x
Ownley BH, Gwinn KD, Vega FE (2010) Endophytic fungal entomopathogens with activity against plant pathogens: ecology and evolution. BioControl 55:113–128. doi:10.1007/s10526-009-9241-x
Pandey P, Chauhan UK (2007) Effects of pesticides (endosulfan and quinalphos) on microbial community under controlled conditions. FASEB J 21:791–792
Park HK, Han JH, Kim TS, Joung Y, Cho SH, Kwon SW (2015) Sphingomonas aeria sp. nov. from indoor air of a pharmaceutical environment. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 107:47–53. doi:10.1007/s10482-014-0302-5
Peng GX, Wang ZK, Yin YP, Zeng DY, Xia YX (2008) Field trials of Metarhizium anisopliae var. acridum (Ascomycota: Hypocreales) against oriental migratory locusts, Locusta migratoria manilensis (Meyen), in Northern China. Crop Prot 27(9):1244–1250. doi:10.1016/J.CROPRO.2008.03.007
Perazzolli M, Antonielli L, Storari M, Puopolo G, Pancher M, Giovannini O, Pindo M, Pertota I (2014) Resilience of the natural phyllosphere microbiota of the grapevine to chemical and biological pesticides. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:3585–3596. doi:10.1128/AEM.00415-14
Pilz C, Enkerli J, Wegensteiner R, Keller S (2011) Establishment and persistence of the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae in maize fields. J Appl Entomol 135:393–403. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0418.2010.01566.x
Prober SM, Leff JW, Bates ST, Borer ET, Firn J, Harpole WS, Lind EM, Seabloom EW, Adler PB, Bakker JD, Cleland EE, DeCrappeo NM, DeLorenze E, Hagenah N, Hautier Y, Hofmockel KS, Kirkman KP, Knops MH, La Pierre KJ, MacDougall AS, McCulley RL, Mitchell CE, Risch AC, Schuetz M, Stevens CJ, Williams RJ, Fierer N (2015) Plant diversity predicts beta but not alpha diversity of soil microbes across grasslands worldwide. Ecol Lett 18(1):85–95. doi:10.1111/ele.12381
Rastogi G, Sbodio A, Tech JJ, Suslow TV, Coaker GL, Leveau JH (2012) Leaf microbiota in an agroecosystem: spatiotemporal variation in bacterial community composition on field-grown lettuce. ISME J 6(10):1812–1822. doi:10.1038/ismej.2012.32
Remadevi OK, Sasidharan TO, Balachander M, Bai NS (2010) Metarhizium based mycoinsecticides for forest pest management. J Biopest 3(2):470–473
Roberts DW, St Leger RJ (2004) Metarhizium spp., cosmopolitan insect-pathogenic fungi: mycological aspects. Adv Appl Microbiol 54:1–70. doi:10.1016/S0065-2164(04)54001-7
Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK (2010) edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26(1):139–111
Ruiz-Gonzalez C, Nino-Garcıa JP, Giorgio PA (2015) Terrestrial origin of bacterial communities in complex boreal freshwater networks. Ecol Lett 18:1198–1206. doi:10.1111/ele.12499
Salonlus P (1972) Effect of DDT and fenitrothion on forest soil micromicrobiota. J Econ Entomol 65:1089–1096. doi:10.1093/jee/65.4.1089
Sandhu A, Halverson LJ, Beattie GA (2007) Bacterial degradation of airborne phenol in the phyllosphere. Environ Microbiol 9(2):383–392. doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01149.x
Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, Lesniewski RA, Oakley BB, Parks DH, Robinson CJ, Sahl JW, Stres B, Thallinger GG, Van Horn DJ, Weber CF (2009) Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 75(23):7537–7541. doi:10.1128/AEM.01541-09
Schreiber L, Krimm U, Knoll D, Sayed M, Auling G, Kroppenstedt RM (2005) Plant-microbe interactions: identification of epiphytic bacteria and their ability to alter leaf surface permeability. New Phytol 166:589–594. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01343.x
Segata N, Izard J, Waldron L, Gevers D, Miropolsky L, Garrett WS, Huttenhower C (2011) Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol 12:R60. doi:10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60
Silva RA, Quintela ED, Mascarin GM, Pedrini N, Lião LM, Ferri PH (2015) Unveiling chemical defense in the rice stalk stink bug against the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae. J Invertebr Pathol 127:93–100. doi:10.1016/j.jip.2015.03.009
Sivasundaram V, Rajendran L, Muthumeena K, Suresh S, Raguchander T, Samiyappan R (2008) Effect of talc-formulated entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria against leaffolder (Cnaphalocrosis medinalis) in rice. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 24:1123–1132. doi:10.1007/s11274-007-9583-4
Spence C, Alff E, Johnson C, Ramos C, Donofrio N, Sundaresan V, Bais H (2014) Natural rice rhizospheric microbes suppress rice blast infections. BMC Plant Biol 14:130. doi:10.1186/1471-2229-14-130
St Leger RJ (2008) Studies on adaptations of Metarhizium anisopliae to life in the soil. J Invertebr Pathol 98:271–276. doi:10.1016/j.jip.2008.01.007
Sylla J, Alsanius BW, Krüger E, Reineke A, Bischoff-Schaefer M, Wohanka W (2013) Introduction of Aureobasidium pullulans to the phyllosphere of organically grown strawberries with focus on its establishment and interactions with the resident microbiome. Agronomy 3:704–731. doi:10.3390/agronomy3040704
Tan SQ, Zhang KQ, Chen HX, Ge Y, Ji R, Shi WP (2015) The mechanism for microsporidian parasite suppression of the hindgut bacteria of the migratory locust Locusta migratoria manilensis. Sci Rep 5:17365. doi:10.1038/srep17365
Tang J, Yao K, Liu SL, Jia DY, Chi YL, Zeng CY (2013) Biodegradation of 3-phenoxybenzoic acid by a novel Sphingomonas sp. SC-1. Fresenius Environ Bull 22:1564–1572
Tiago PV, Oliveira NT, Lima EL (2014) Biological insect control using Metarhizium anisopliae: morphological, molecular, and ecological aspects. Santa Maria 44(4):645–651. doi:10.1590/S0103-84782014000400012
Vega FE, Goettel MS, Blackwell M, Chandlerd D, Jacksone MA, Keller S, Koike M, Maniania NK, Monzón A, Ownley BH, Jk P, Rangel DEN, Roy HE (2009) Fungal entomopathogens: new insights on their ecology. Fungal Ecol 2:149–159. doi:10.1016/j.funeco.2009.05.001
Vig K, Singh DK, Agarwal HC, Dhawan AK, Dureja P (2008) Soil microorganisms in cotton fields sequentially treated with insecticides. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 69:263–276. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2006.12.008
Walter M, Frampton CM, Boyd-Wilson KS, Harris-Virgin P, Waipara NW (2007) Agrichemical impact on growth and survival of non-target apple phyllosphere microorganisms. Can J Microbiol 53:45–55. doi:10.1139/w06-093
Wei F, Hu XP, Xu XG (2016) Dispersal of Bacillus subtilis and its effect on strawberry phyllosphere microbiota under open field and protection conditions. Sci Rep 6:22611. doi:10.1038/srep22611
Williams TR, Marco ML (2014) Phyllosphere microbiota composition and microbial community transplantation on lettuce plants grown indoors. MBio 5:e01564–e01514. doi:10.1128/mBio.01564-14
Wilson FP, Liu XK, Mattes TE, Cupples AM (2016) Nocardioides, Sediminibacterium, Aquabacterium, Variovorax, and Pseudomonas linked to carbon uptake during aerobic vinyl chloride biodegradation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:19062–19070. doi:10.1007/s11356-016-7099-x
Wraight SP, Ugine TA, Ramos ME, Sanderson JP (2016) Efficacy of spray applications of entomopathogenic fungi against western flower thrips infesting greenhouse impatiens under variable moisture conditions. Biol Control 97:31–47. doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2016.02.016
Yang JH, Liu HX, Zhu GM, Pan YL, Xu LP, Guo JH (2008) Diversity analysis of antagonists from rice-associated bacteria and their application in biocontrol of rice diseases. J Appl Microbiol 104:91–104. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03534.x
Zhang BG, Bai ZH, Hoefel D, Tang L, Wang XY, Li BJ, Li ZM, Zhuang GH (2009) The impacts of cypermethrin pesticide application on the non-target microbial community of the pepper plant phyllosphere. Sci Total Environ 407:1915–1922. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.11.049
Acknowledgments
This research is supported by the Important National Science & Technology Specific Projects of China (Grant No. 2017YFD0201208) and by an US-NSF grant (IOS-1557704) to NOK.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(PDF 1032 kb).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hong, M., Peng, G., Keyhani, N.O. et al. Application of the entomogenous fungus, Metarhizium anisopliae, for leafroller (Cnaphalocrocis medinalis) control and its effect on rice phyllosphere microbial diversity. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 101, 6793–6807 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-017-8390-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-017-8390-6