Abstract
The gut microbiota plays important roles in the health and well-being of animals, and high-throughput sequencing facilitates exploration of microbial populations in the animal gut. However, previous studies have focused on fecal samples instead of the gastrointestinal tract. In this study, we compared the microbiota diversity and composition of intestinal contents of weaned piglets treated with Lactobacillus reuteri or chlortetracycline (aureomycin) using high-throughput sequencing. Nine weaned piglets were randomly divided into three groups and supplemented with L. reuteri, chlortetracycline, or saline for 10 days, and then the contents of three intestinal segments (jejunum, colon, and cecum) were obtained and used for sequencing of the V3–V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene. The microbiota diversity and composition in the jejunum were different from those in the colon and cecum among the three treatments. In the jejunum, treatment with L. reuteri increased the species richness of the microbiota, as indicated by the ACE and Chao1 indexes, compared with the chlortetracycline group, in which several taxa were eliminated. In the colon and cecum, relative abundances of the phylum Firmicutes and the genus Prevotella were higher in the chlortetracycline group than in the other groups. Distances between clustered samples revealed that the L. reuteri group was closer to the chlortetracycline group than the control group for jejunum samples, while colon and cecum samples of the L. reuteri group were clustered with those of the control group. This study provides fundamental knowledge for future studies such as the development of alternatives to antibiotics.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Immediately after birth, the mammalian gastrointestinal (GI) tract is colonized by a complex and diverse microbial ecosystem. The GI microbiota produces essential products, forms a barrier against pathogens, and plays multiple roles in intestinal morphology, immunity, digestion, and modulation of host gene expression (Turnbaugh et al. 2006; Guo et al. 2008). Furthermore, the GI microbiota is dynamic, and its composition is changing continually in response to new microbes in the individual’s environment. The number of studies of the composition of the intestinal microbiome is increasing rapidly, reflecting a growing interest in understanding the function of the intestinal microbiota in animal health.
During the process of weaning, piglets are abruptly forced to adapt to nutritional, immunological, and psychological disruptions (Hu et al. 2014), and the microbiota of the GI tract can change sharply, resulting in poor appetite, lower feed intake, and growth retardation (Isaacson and Kim 2012). Fecal microbiota analyses have demonstrated that the use of antibiotics can destroy pathogens as well as other members of the intestinal microbiota (Cecilia et al. 2007), and the microbiota of the GI tract does not immediately return to normal after cessation of antibiotic treatment (Yin et al. 2015). Lactobacillus species, which are members of normal intestinal flora, have become a topic of great interest because they can alter the host intestinal microbiota, thereby affecting the physiological functions of animals and the general health of weaned pigs (Liu et al. 2015; Jiao et al. 2014). However, microbiota sampled from feces do not fully represent the microbial profile of the GI tract (Zhao et al. 2015), and the effect of Lactobacillus and antibiotics on the diversity and composition of gut microbiota during the weaning process remains unclear.
It has been estimated that at least 50 % of the microbiota of the GI tract cannot be grown outside the gut, and indeed, the vast majority of gut bacteria have never been cultivated outside the gut (Shanahan 2002; Sears 2005). Therefore, it is difficult to extensively explore the microbial diversity of the healthy gut using culture-dependent methods. High-throughput DNA sequencing methods, such as Illumina sequencing, provide a way to directly detect microbial taxa, especially those with low-abundance species changes (Oberauner et al. 2013; Uroz et al. 2013). Furthermore, Illumina sequencing is cost-effective and can generate tenfold or more sequences per sample than pyrosequencing 454, thereby allowing detailed analysis of taxonomic profiles from samples (Kozich et al. 2013).
Lactobacillus reuteri ZLR003, isolated from the cecum mucosa of a healthy weaned pig, exhibited tolerance to acid and swine bile as well as antimicrobial activity against Escherichia coli in vitro. In addition, dietary supplementation with L. reuteri ZLR003 increased feed intake and weight gains and improved fecal microbial composition and immune regulation in weaned pigs (unpublished data). To gain insight into the mechanism behind the probiotic properties of L. reuteri ZLR003, we performed high-throughput sequencing to compare the diversity and composition of the microbiota of three intestinal segments of weaned piglets treated with L. reuteri, chlortetracycline (aureomycin), or sterile saline (control). This study provides us with key information that will be used to elucidate the relationship between the three treatments and the intestinal microbiota. It also provides fundamental knowledge that will facilitate studies such as the development of alternatives to antibiotics.
Materials and methods
Lactobacillus and antibiotic preparation
The strain L. reuteri ZLR003 was isolated from the cecum mucosa of a healthy weaned piglet in our laboratory. The strain was identified through standard morphological, biochemical, and physiological tests as well as 16S rDNA sequence analysis by the China Center of Industrial Culture Collection (Beijing, China). The strain is preserved at the China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center (CGMCC), and the CGMCC number is 11,530.
The strain was inoculated 1:100 into MRS broth (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and incubated for 18 h at 37 °C. Bacterial cells was harvested by centrifugation (6738×g for 10 min) at 4 °C under aseptic conditions and then resuspended in 0.85 % sterile saline solution. The viable cell count of the bacterial suspension was 2.0 × 109 cfu/mL. The concentration of chlortetracycline (Mellon, Biological Technology Co., Ltd., Dalian, China; >95 %) was adjusted to 100 mg/kg using 0.85 % sterile saline solution. The 0.85 % sterile saline solution without L. reuteri ZLR003 or chlortetracycline was used as the control treatment. The three preparations were prepared once every 2 days at the same time and stored at 4 °C.
Animals
Crossbred (Landrace × Large White) sibling piglets were used in this study. Nine weaned piglets (four males and five females) with an average initial body weight of 8.57 ± 1.28 kg were housed in three separate cages of identical construction under the same environmental conditions. Littermates were used to minimize differences arising from maternal microbiota. Piglets were weaned at 30 days of age. After weaning, piglets were randomly divided into three groups and subsequently treated with sterile saline (control), chlortetracycline, or L. reuteri. All piglets were given a basic diet specifically designed for the stage (Feeding Standard of Swine 2004) (Table 1). Piglets in the L. reuteri group received 5 mL of L. reuteri ZLR003 (2.0 × 109 cfu/mL) orally every morning. Piglets in the chlortetracycline group received 5 mL of chlortetracycline (100 mg/kg), and those in the control group received 5 mL of 0.85 % sterile saline solution at the same time. Piglets were housed in a controlled environment with stainless steel beds and were allowed ad libitum access to feed and water through a feeder and nipple drinker throughout the experimental period. The room temperature was maintained between 25 and 28 °C with 60 % relative humidity. The experimental period was 10 days.
Sample collection
At the end of the experiment, all piglets were euthanized under anesthesia, by exsanguination. Then, the contents of three intestinal segments (jejunum, colon, and cecum) were collected simultaneously. The 27 samples were snap-frozen in sterile containers on liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C.
DNA extraction, PCR, and sequencing
Total bacterial DNA was extracted from the collected intestinal contents using the E.Z.N.A. ® Stool DNA Kit (Omega Bio-tek, Norcross, GA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. The DNA quality was determined using agarose gel electrophoresis and a NanoDrop 8000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Scoresby, Australia). Amplification of the V3–V4 region of the bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA gene was performed with the following the PCR cycling conditions: an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, 27 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s; 55 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 45 s; and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The primers 338F (5′-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCA-3′ and 806 R 5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′ were designed with an attached eight-base barcode sequence that was unique to each sample. The PCR was carried out in triplicate using 4 μL of 5× FastPfu Buffer, 2 μL of 2.5 mM dNTPs, 0.8 μL of each primer (5 μM), 0.4 μL of FastPfu Polymerase, and 10 ng of template DNA in a final volume of 20 μL.
The PCR products were extracted from 2 % agarose gels, purified using the AxyPrep DNA Gel Extraction Kit (Axygen Biosciences, Union City, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and quantified using QuantiFluor™-ST (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Purified amplicons were pooled in equimolar amounts and paired-end sequenced (2 × 250) on an Illumina MiSeq platform according to standard protocols. The raw reads were deposited into the NCBI Sequence Read Archive database (accession number: SRP071319).
Processing of sequence data
Raw fastq files were demultiplexed and quality filtered using QIIME (version 1.17) according to the following criteria: (i) the 300-bp reads were truncated at any site receiving an average quality score < 20 over a 50-bp sliding window, discarding the truncated reads that were shorter than 50-bp; (ii) exact barcode matches, two- nucleotide primer mismatchea, and reads containing ambiguous characters were removed; and (iii) only sequences that overlapped more than 10 bp were assembled. Reads that could not be assembled were discarded. Operational units (OTUs) were clustered using UPARSE (version 7.1, http://drive5.com/uparse/) at a 97 % similarity level and chimeric sequences were identified and removed using UCHIME. Taxonomic classification of phylotypes was determined using the Ribosomal Database Project Classifier (http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/) against the Silva (SSU115)16S rRNA database at a 70 % confidence threshold (Amato et al. 2013).
Results
DNA sequence data
A total of 1,523,335 paired-end reads comprising 917,047,670 bp were generated from the raw data, and 1,354,684 valid sequences remained after chimeras were filtered out and low-quality sequences were removed. Among the high-quality sequences, about 99.98 % were longer than 400 bp, and most were between 400 and 460 bp, with an average of 441.22 bp. There was an average of 39, 478 reads for each sample. A total of 9021 OTUs were identified from all samples, with an average of 334 per sample. Rarefaction analysis was used to standardize and compare observed taxon richness among samples and to determine whether the contents of intestinal segments were unequally sampled. The results shown in Fig. 1 suggest that this sequencing depth was sufficient to cover the microbial diversity of each sample.
Alpha diversity of the GI microbiota
Sequence information and calculated microbial diversity indexes of the samples are shown in Table 2. The ACE, Chao1, Shannon, and Simpson indexes indicate that species richness and species diversity were significantly lower in the jejunum than in the hindgut (colon and cecum) in all three treatment groups. In addition, the ACE and Chao1 indexes indicate that species richness in the jejunum was higher in the L. reuteri group than in the chlortetracycline group. However, there were no significant differences in the alpha diversity of microbiota of the colon or cecum between either the chlortetracycline group or the L. reuteri group and the control group based on the ACE, Chao1, Shannon, and Simpson indexes.
Venn diagrams were used to evaluate the distribution of OTUs among the different treatment groups. As shown in Fig. 2a–c, the total number of OTUs was higher in the colon and cecum than in the jejunum of piglets. In the jejunum, a total of 135 OTUs were shared by the three treatment groups. Most of them belonged to the phyla Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Fusobacteria. Furthermore, the number of unique OTUs in the L. reuteri group was significantly higher than that in the other two groups, especially the chlortetracycline group, which had the lowest number of unique OTUs among the three groups. In the colon and cecum, 437 and 431 OTUs were shared by the three treatments, respectively. Most of them belonged to Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Spirochaetae, and Fusobacteria.
Microbiota compositions in the three treatment groups
Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Fusobacteria, and Verrucomicrobia were the dominant phyla, representing more than 96 % of taxa in the jejunum, colon, and cecum in all three treatment groups. However, there were significant differences among the microbiota profiles of the three intestinal segments in the three treatment groups. In the jejunum, Proteobacteria was the dominant phylum in the L. reuteri and chlortetracycline groups (73.1 and 86.1 %, respectively), while it represented only 27.7 % of taxa in the control group. Firmicutes was the dominant phylum in the control group (53.8 %). Conversely, Bacteroidetes was dominant in the colon in all three treatment groups (43.5, 47.7, and 35.0 % in the control, chlortetracycline, and L. reuteri groups, respectively). In the cecum, Bacteroidetes was the dominant phylum in the control and L. reuteri groups (45.4 and 35.2 %, respectively), while Firmicutes was the most abundant phylum in the chlortetracycline group (42.8 %). In addition, Verrucomicrobia represented a high percentage of taxa in the jejunum of the control group (13.3 %) and was also observed in the colon and cecum of the control and L. reuteri groups. The relative abundance of Verrucomicrobia was lowest in the chlortetracycline group in all three intestinal segments (Fig. 3a–c).
A hierarchically clustered heatmap of the microbiota composition of the jejunum at the genus level is shown in Fig. 4a. The relative abundance of the genus Actinobacillus was highest in the chlortetracycline group (73.54 %), followed by the L. reuteri group (21.13 %). Escherichia-Shigella, Lactobacillus, and Streptococcus were less abundant in the chlortetracycline group than in the L. reuteri group, and other genera, such as Comamonas and Enterococcus, were not detected in the chlortetracycline group. Conversely, the relative abundances of Parabacteroides and Lachnospiraceae incertae sedis were higher in the L. reuteri group than in the chlortetracycline and control groups. Furthermore, while the relative abundance of Akkermansia was 13.28 % in the control group, this genus was not detected in the chlortetracycline and L. reuteri groups.
In the colon and cecum, the genus Prevotella was more abundant than it was in the jejunum in all three treatment groups. The OTUs uncultured Prevotellaceae and uncultured Ruminococcaceae were also abundant in the chlortetracycline group. The relative abundances of Treponema, Parabacteroides, and Desulfovibrio were higher in the L. reuteri group than in the other two groups. Furthermore, Escherichia-Shigella was more abundant in the control and L. reuteri groups than in the chlortetracycline group (Fig. 4b, c).
Relationships among microbiota of the three treatment groups
A multiple sample similarities tree was constructed to identify the similarities and differences among the three treatments (Fig. 5). Comparison of the microbiota of the different intestinal segments showed that the taxonomic composition of the jejunum was separate from the compositions of the colon and cecum in all three treatment groups. The taxonomic composition of the jejunum in the L. reuteri group was closest to that in the chlortetracycline group, indicating that these two treatments resulted in more similar community structures. The taxonomic compositions of the colon and cecum were clustered according to treatment (control, L. reuteri, or chlortetracycline), but the compositions in the L. reuteri group were closer to those in the control group than to those in the chlortetracycline group.
The results of nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis (Fig. 6) were consistent with the multiple samples similarity tree. The samples were clustered into the following five groups: jejunum samples of the control group, jejunum samples of the chlortetracycline group, jejunum samples of the L. reuteri group, colon and cecum samples of the chlortetracycline group, and colon and cecum samples of the control and L. reuteri groups.
Discussion
Previous studies have identified changes in microbiota during weaning using culture-dependent methods, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), and reverse transcription PCR (Eckburg et al. 2005; Liu et al. 2014; Sattler et al. 2015). High-throughput (next-generation) sequencing methods provide a more direct way to analyze microbiota taxa, especially the changes of the low-abundant species. Recent studies of fecal microbial shifts in pigs, using Roche 454 GS FLX Titanium protocols or the Illumina MiSeq platform, have contributed to our understanding of changes in microbiota that occur during weaning, a physiologically stressful time for pigs (Lu et al. 2014; Pajarillo et al. 2014; Zhao et al. 2015; Niu et al. 2015). These previous studies have suggested that improvement of the overall health of pigs requires a better understanding of the intestinal environment, particularly the interactions among microorganisms within the gut microbiota and between microorganisms and the host animal. Therefore, in the present study, we evaluated the microbiota of three intestinal segments in weaned piglets treated with L. reuteri, chlortetracycline, or sterile saline (control) using the Illumina MiSeq platform.
Alpha diversity is the diversity of a community within one site (or one sample), that is, the number of species and their relative abundances within one sampling site. High bacterial diversity is favorable for the overall health and productivity of animals (Hildebrand et al. 2013). We used ACE, Chao1, Shannon, and Simpson indexes as well as Venn diagrams to compare the alpha diversity among different treatment groups. The results showed that species richness and species diversity of GI microbiota were lower in the jejunum than in the hindgut (colon and cecum). These results are consistent with data reported by Zhao et al. (2015), who analyzed microbiota in the jejunum, ileum, and colon and cecum of pigs over a 6-month period using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Hou et al. (2015) also found that the Shannon diversity index was higher in colonic digesta than in ileal digesta of piglets after oral administration of L. reuteri I5007 at days 7, 14, and 21. It has been reported that the use of antibiotics can reduce alpha diversity (Knecht et al. 2014). Similarly, Manichanh et al. (2010) found that intake of an antibiotic cocktail for a short period of time had profound long-term effects on the rat intestinal microbiome. Our study indicated that changes in alpha diversity resulting from the different treatments were most pronounced in the jejunum. The ACE and Chao1 indexes indicated that species richness of the microbiolta in the jejunum was higher in the L. reuteri group than in the chlortetracycline group, and the Venn diagrams showed that the L. reuteri group had more unique OTUs than the chlortetracycline group. In the colon and cecum, there was no significant difference in alpha diversity among the L. reuteri, control, and chlortetracycline groups. Previous studies using PCR-DGGE (Simpson et al. 1999; Su et al. 2008) showed that L. reuteri MM53 and Lactobacillus sobrius S1 had no significant effects on microbial diversity in the hindgut of piglets or weaned piglets at days 7, 14, 21, and 24. However, reports of the effect of Lactobacillus species on the alpha diversity of the small intestine are limited.
In mammals, the dominant phyla in the GI tract are Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, and Fusobacteria. These four taxa were also the dominant phyla in the GI tract of weaned piglets after 10 days of treatment in our study. However, the relative abundances of the taxa in our study were not consistent with the results of previous studies in which microbiota were sampled from pigs at the ages of 6 months (Zhao et al. 2015) and 11–12 weeks (Isaacson and Kim 2012). The differences are due to variability in the distribution of intestinal microbes, which is influenced by pig species, feed, husbandry, and age (Zhao et al. 2015). In our study, there were marked differences in microbiota profiles between the jejunum and the hindgut (colon and cecum), while there was only slight variation between the colon and the cecum. These results are consistent with those of Zhao et al. (2015). The small intestine is mainly responsible for digestion and absorption, while the large intestine is the site of microbial fermentation and has high numbers of microorganisms, especially in the cecum. The dominant genera in the small intestine belonged to aerobe or facultative anaerobe categories, whereas the main genera in the large intestine were all anaerobes. Therefore, the specificity of the microbial community is related to the function of each intestinal tract segment.
It has been proposed that alteration of gut microbiota is one mechanism by which antibiotics enhance the growth of livestock (Schwarz and Chaslus-Dancla 2001; Dibner and Richards 2005). The microbiota profile of the jejunum was affected by the three treatments in our study. Proteobacteria were significantly more abundant in the chlortetracycline and L. reuteri groups than in the control group. The multiple samples similarity tree and the NMDS analysis showed that the taxonomic composition in the jejunum was more similar between the chlortetracycline and L. reuteri groups than between either of these groups and the control group. However, while the increase in the relative abundance of Proteobacteria was mostly correlated with an increase in the relative abundance of Actinobacillus in the chlortetracycline group, it was mostly correlated with increases in the relative abundances of Actinobacillus and Escherichia-Shigella in the L. reuteri group. Zhao et al. (2015) reported that Escherichia-Shigella is a dominant group in the small intestine, where it mostly takes part in digestion. The difference in the relative abundance of Escherichia-Shigella between the L. reuteri and chlortetracycline groups in our study suggests that Lactobacillus and the antibiotic may act differently to improve the growth performance of animals, but this requires further study.
The relative abundance of Firmicutes in the porcine large intestine is higher than that in the small intestine, suggesting that the large intestine might undertake some tasks of fat deposition. It has been shown that fat pigs have more Firmicutes but fewer Bacteroidetes (Ley et al. 2006), the latter of which are important for the degradation of carbohydrates (Arumugam et al. 2011). In our study, the relative abundance of Firmicutes in both the colon and the cecum was higher in the chlortetracycline group than in the control and L. reuteri groups. The multiple sample similarity tree and the NMDS analysis illustrated that colon and cecum samples from the L. reuteri group were clustered with samples from the control group rather than samples from the chlortetracycline group. At the genus level, the most obvious difference among the three treatments in our study was in the abundance of Prevotella. The increase in the relative abundance of Prevotella in the colon and cecum compared with the jejunum was greater in the chlortetracycline group than in the other groups. Pajarillo et al. (2014) showed that Prevotella became one of the most abundant genera in pigs after weaning. Prevotella represented up to 30 % of all classifiable bacteria at 10 weeks of age, but by the time the pigs were 22 weeks old, Prevotella accounted for only 3.5–4.0 % of the bacteria (Isaacson and Kim 2012). It has been suggested that the increase in the relative abundance of Prevotella during the post-weaning period is due to the ability of these bacteria to degrade hemicelluloses such as xylans in plant-based feed (Hayashi et al. 2007; Lamendella et al. 2011). The changes in the relative abundances of Firmicutes and Prevotella in the chlortetracycline group in our study may indicate that the antibiotic sped up the development and maturation of the microbiota to the adult “climax” community, as reported by Kim et al. (2012).
We also found that some taxa were detected in the control and L. reuteri groups, but not in the chlortetracycline group, especially in the jejunum. Examples include uncultured Christensenellaceae, Ruminococcaceae incertae sedis, Comamonas, and Enterococcus. These results may indicate that several genera were eliminated by the antibiotic. We also found that bacteria in the phylum Verrucomicrobia were less abundant in the chlortetracycline group than in the other groups among all three intestinal tract segments. Yin et al. (2015) found that the GI microbiota did not return to normal immediately after cessation of antibiotic treatment. For example, following treatment with ceftriaxone sodium, cefoperazone/sulbactam, meropenem, or vancomycin, the Shannon index and the number of OTUs returned to normal on the 14th and 90th days after drug withdrawal, respectively, and dysbiosis and recovery were determined by the antibiotics’ mode of action on the bacterial cell wall. Furthermore, in our study, the relative abundances of Lactobacillus, Streptococcus, unclassified Fusobacteriales, Prevotella, and Staphylococcus in the jejunum were higher in the L. reuteri group than in the chlortetracycline group. In the colon and cecum, Treponema was significantly less abundant in the L. reuteri group than in the chlortetracycline and control groups. Treponema species have been shown to induce colitis in the infected host (Molbak et al. 2006). A recent metagenomic study showed that there are unusually high levels of certain Treponema species (Spirochaetes) in the porcine gut, relative to levels in other mammals (Lamendella et al. 2011). Our results are in line with the findings of Riboulet-Bisson et al. (2012), who showed that a Lactobacillus salivarious strain had the ability to modulate the level of Treponema.
In conclusion, changes in the diversity and composition of gut microbiota of weaned piglets were distinct under the three treatments in this study (control, chlortetracycline, and L. reuteri ZLR003). To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare gut microbiota between pigs treated with Lactobacillus and pigs treated with chlortetracycline. There is a lot more to explore in this field, and our findings will facilitate the application of Lactobacillus strains in animal production.
References
Amato KR, Yeoman CJ, Kent A, Righini N, Carbonero F, Estrada A, Gaskins HR, Stumpf RM, Yildirim S, Torralba M, Gilllis M, Wilson BA, Nelson KE, White BA, Leigh SR (2013) Habitat degradation impacts black howler monkey (Alouatta pigra) gastrointestinal microbiomes. The ISME Journal 7:1344–1353
Arumugam M, Raes J, Pelletier E, Paslier D, Yamada T, Mende DR, Fernandes GR, Tap J, Bruls T, Batto JM, Bertalan M, Borruel N, Casellas F, Fernandez L, Gautier L, Hansen T, Hattori M, Hayashi T, Kleerebezem M, Kurokawa K, Leclerc M, Levenez F, Manichanh C, Nielsen HB, Nielsen T, Pons N, Poulain J, Qin J, Sicheritz-Ponten T, Tims S, Torrents D, Ugarte E, Zoetendal EG, Wang J, Guarner F, Pedersen O, de Vos WM, Brunak S, Dore J, MetaHIT Consortium, Antolin M, Artiguenave F, Blottiere HM, Almeida M, Brechot C, Cara C, Chervaux C, Cultrone A, Delorme C, Denariaz G, Dervyn R, Foerstner KU, Friss C, van de Guchte M, Guedon E, Haimet F, Huber W, van Hylckama-Vlieg J, Jamet A, Juste C, Kaci G, Knol J, Lakhdari O, Layec S, Le Roux K, Maguin E, Merieux A, Melo Minardi R, Mrini C, Muller J, Oozeer R, Parkhill J, Renault P, Rescigno M, Sanchez N, Sunagawa S, Torrejon A, Turner K, Vandemeulebrouck G, Varela E, Winogradsky Y, Zeller G, Weissenbach J, Ehrlich SD, Bork P (2011) Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome. Nature 473(7346):174–180. doi:10.1038/nature 09944
Cecilia J, Sonja L, Charlotta E, Janet KJ (2007) Long-term ecological impacts of antibiotic administration on the human intestinal microbiota. ISME J 1:56–66
Dibner JJ, Richards JD (2005) Antibiotic growth promoters in agriculture: history and mode of action. Poult Sci 84:634–643
Eckburg PB, Bik EM, Bernstein CN, Purdom E, Dethlefsen L, Sargent M, Gill SR, Nelson KE, Relman DA (2005) Diversity of the human intestinal microbial flora. Science 308(5728):1635–1638
Feeding Standard of Swine (2004) China Agriculture Press, Beijing, China
Guo X, Xia X, Tang R, Zhou J, Zhao H, Wang K, Wang K (2008) Development of a real-time PCR method for Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes in faeces and its application to quantify intestinal population of obese and lean pigs. Lett Appl Microbiol 47:367–373
Hayashi H, Shibata K, Sakamoto M, Tomita S, Benno Y (2007) Prevotella copri sp. nov. and Prevotella stercorea sp. nov., isolated from human faeces. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:941–946
Hildebrand F, Nguyen T, Brinkman B, Yunta RG, Cauwe B, Vandenabeele P, Liston A, Raes J (2013) Inflammation associated enterotypes, host genotype, cage and inter-individual effects drive gut microbiota variation in common laboratory mice. Genome Biol 14:R4
Hou C, Liu H, Zhang J, Zhang S, Yang F, Zeng X, Thacker P, Zhang G, Qiao S (2015) Intestinal microbiota succession and immunomodulatory consequences after introduction of Lactobacillus reuteri I5007 in neonatal piglets. PLoS One 10(3):e0119505. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0119505
Hu CH, Song ZH, Xiao K, Song J, Jiao LF, Ke YL (2014) Zinc oxide influences intestinal integrity, the expressions of genes associated with inflammation, and TLR4-myeloid differentiation factor 88 signaling pathways in weanling pigs. Innate Immun 20(5):478–486
Isaacson R, Kim HB (2012) The intestinal microbiome of the pig. Anim Health Res Rev 13:100–109
Jiao LF, Song ZH, Ke YL, Xiao K, Hu CH, Shi B (2014) Cello-oligosaccharide influences intestinal microflora, mucosal architecture and nutrient transport in weaned pigs. Anim Feed Sci Tech 195:85–91
Kim HB, Borewicz K, White BA, Singer RS, Sreevatsan S, Tu ZJ, Isaacson RE (2012) Microbial shifts in the swine distal gut in response to the treatment with antimicrobial growth promoter, tylosin. PNAS 109(38):15485–15490. doi:10.1073/pnas.1205147109
Knecht H, Neulinger SC, Heinsen FA, Knecht C, Schilhabel A, Schmitz RA, Zimmermann A, dos Santos VM, Ferrer M, Rosenstiel PC, Schreiber S, Friedrichs AK, Ott SJ (2014) Effects of beta-lactam antibiotics and fluoroquinolones on human gut microbiota in relation to Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea. PLoS One 9(2):e89417. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089417
Kozich JJ, Westcott SL, Baxter NT, Highlander SK, Schloss PD (2013) Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:5112–5120
Lamendella R, Domingo JW, Ghosh S, Martinson J, Oerther DB (2011) Comparative fecal metagenomics unveils unique functional capacity of the swine gut. BMC Microbiol 11:103
Ley RE, Turnbaugh PJ, Klein S, Gordon JI (2006) Microbial ecology: human gut microbes associated with obesity. Nature 444:1022–1023
Liu H, Zhang J, Zhang S, Yang F, Thacker PA, Zhang G, Qiao S, Ma X (2014) Oral administration of Lactobacillus fermentum I5007 favors intestinal development and alters the intestinal microbiota in formula-fed piglets. J Agric Food Chem 62:860–866
Liu H, Ji HF, Zhang DY, Wang SX, Wang J, Shan DC, Wang YM (2015) Effects of Lactobacillus brevis preparation on growth performance, fecal microflora and serum profile in weaned pigs. Livest Sci 178:251–254
Lu XM, Lu PZ, Zhang H (2014) Bacterial communities in manures of piglets and adult pigs bred with different feeds revealed by 16S r DNA 454 pyrosequencing. Appl Microbiol Biotech 98:2657–2665
Manichanh C, Reeder J, Gibert P, Varela E, Llopis M, Antolin M, Guigo R, Knight R, Guarner F (2010) Reshaping the gut microbiome with bacterial transplantation and antibiotic intake. Genome Res 20:1411–1419. doi:10.1101/gr.107987.110
Molbak L, Klitgaard K, Jensen TK, Fossi M, Boye M (2006) Identification of a novel, invasive, not-yet-cultivated Treponema sp. in the large intestine of pigs by PCR amplification of the 16S rRNA gene. J Clin Microbiol 44:4537–4540
Niu Q, Li P, Hao SS, Zhang YQ, Kim SW, Li HZ, Ma X, Gao S, He LC, WJ W, Huang XG, Hua JD, Zhou B, Huang RH (2015) Dynamic distribution of the gut microbiota and the relationship with apparent crude fiber digestibility and growth stages in pigs. Sci Rep 5:9938. doi:10.1038/srep09938
Oberauner L, Zachow C, Lackner S, Hogenauer C, Smolle KH, Berg G (2013) The ignored diversity: complex bacterial communities in intensive care units revealed by 16S pyrosequencing. Sci Rep 3 doi:10.1038/srep01413
Pajarillo EA, Chae JP, Balolong MP, Kim HB, Seo KS, Kang DK (2014) Pyrosequencing-based analysis of fecal microbial communities in three purebred pig lines. J Microbiol 52(8):646–651
Riboulet-Bisson E, Sturme MH, Jeffery IB, Riboulet-Bisson E, Sturme MH, Jeffery IB, O'Donnell MM, Neville BA, Forde BM, Claesson MJ, Harris H, Gardiner GE, Casey PG, Lawlor PG, O'Toole PW, Ross RP (2012) Effect of Lactobacillus salivarius bacteriocin Abp118 on the mouse and pig intestinal microbiota. PLoS One 7(2):e31113
Sattler VA, Bayer K, Schatzmayr G, Haslberger AG, Klose V (2015) Impact of a probiotic, inulin, or their 489 combination on the piglets’ microbiota at different intestinal locations. Benef Microbes 6:473–483
Sears CL (2005) Adynamic partnership: celebrating our gut flora. Anaerobe 11:247–251
Schwarz S, Chaslus-Dancla E (2001) Use of antimicrobials in veterinary medicine and mechanisms of resistance. Vet Res 32:201–225
Shanahan F (2002) The host-microbe interface within the gut. Best Pract. Res. Clin Gastroenterol 16:915–931
Simpson JM, McCracken VJ, White BA, Gaskins HR, Mackie RI (1999) Application of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis for the analysis of the porcine gastrointestinal microbiota. J Microbiol Methods 6:167–179
Su Y, Yao W, Perez-Gutierrez ON, Smidt H, Zhu WY (2008) 16S ribosomal RNA-based methods to monitor changes in the hindgut bacterial community of piglets after oral administration of Lactobacillus sobrius S1. Anaerobe 14(2):78–86
Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Mahowald MA, Magrini V, Mardis ER, Gordon JI (2006) An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature 444:1027–1031
Uroz S, Ioannidis P, Lengelle J, Cébron A, Morin E, Buee M, Martin F (2013) Functional assays and metagenomic analyses reveals differences between the microbial communities inhabiting the soil horizons of a Norway spruce plantation. PLoS One 8:e55929
Yin J, Prabhakar M, Wang S, Liao SX, Peng X, He Y, Chen YR, Shan HF, Su J, Jiang YX, Zhang GX, Zhou HW (2015) Different dynamic patterns of β-lactams, quinolones, glycopeptides and macrolides on mouse gut microbial diversity. PLoS One 10(5):e0126712. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0126712
Zhao W, Wang Y, Liu SY, Huang JJ, Zhai ZX, He C, Ding JM, Wang J, Wanf HJ, Fan WB, Zhao HM (2015) The dynamic distribution of porcine microbiota across different ages and gastrointestinal tract segments. PLoS One 10(2):e0117441. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0117441
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by a special project of the Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission (grant number Z141100002614002), the Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System, the Beijing Innovation Team of Swine (grant number GWZJ-2009-06), and a Scientific and Technological Innovation Ability Construction project of the Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Science (grant number KJCX20150404). We would like to thank Beijing Xiqingminfeng Farm (Beijing, China) for their assistance with these studies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures involving animals were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, D., Ji, H., Liu, H. et al. Changes in the diversity and composition of gut microbiota of weaned piglets after oral administration of Lactobacillus or an antibiotic. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100, 10081–10093 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7845-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7845-5