Introduction

Prior to the development of multidetector computed tomography (CT), paediatric chest imaging was difficult to perform on children with congenital heart disease. With the recent developments in CT equipment, the technical performance of CT has improved dramatically over the past two decades [1,2,3]. Significant improvements in temporal resolution, including shorter rotation times [4, 5], a high helical pitch [6, 7], and wide detectors [8, 9], have proven effective in reducing artefacts associated with high heart rates and motion. These advancements have substantially improved the diagnostic capabilities of congenital heart diseases in children [10]. However, one cause of unnecessary exposure, often cited as significantly contributing to the total dose during helical thoracic CT examination, is the z-over scanning effect [11,12,13,14,15]. Z-over scanning is associated with helical CT and is related to the fact that the z-interpolation necessary for image reconstruction requires data to be acquired above and below each image position [16, 17]. For a given scan length covered in the helical mode, at least half of the rotation (180° in parallel ray geometry) is necessary at the beginning and end of the scan to ensure that complete datasets are obtained for the reconstruction of the first and last sections [18]. Therefore, adaptive collimation is used to reduce the dose deposited outside the imaged volume in the z-axis direction. The highest dose deposited outside the imaged volume on CT arises from internal rather than external scatter. Therefore, an increase in the dose deposited outside the imaged volumed to the lens along the z-axis is a concern in paediatric thoracic CT.

The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Publication 118 reported that the lens of the eye is one of the most radiosensitive tissues [19, 20]. Several recent studies have suggested a low threshold for radiation-induced cataracts [21, 22]. It has also been suggested that no such threshold may exist [23]. The precise mechanism of radiation cataractogenesis is unknown; however, genomic damage resulting in altered cell division, transcription, and abnormal lens fibre cell differentiation is considered salient. Human epidemiological studies and recent experiments on radiation cataracts in animals suggest that the triggering biological processes for the initial development of radiation-induced cataracts may occur following exposure to very low doses of radiation. The effect of the dose deposited outside the imaged volume on cataracts in children remains unknown. Publication 103 of the ICRP in 2007 reviewed recent data on radiation damage to the lens and may change the dose limits in the future [24]. There have been few reports of radiation damage to the lens, especially in children. Special attention must be paid to the lens radiation dose in paediatric CT scans because the life expectancy of children is higher than that of adults. Thyroid dose reduction is also important, particularly in the paediatric population [25]. From the perspective of radiological protection, these effects can be divided into stochastic and deterministic (threshold). The primary concern for the lens is deterministic effects (e.g. cataracts), whereas that for the thyroid is stochastic effects (e.g. cancer). An adaptive collimation method was developed to reduce the dose deposited outside the imaged volume in the z-axis direction during helical scanning. It has been reported [26] that a 50% reduction in the dose deposited outside the imaged volume can be achieved using adaptive collimation. However, the difference in the dose deposited outside the imaged volume to the lens has not been investigated between 40-mm and 80-mm collimation during thoracic paediatric helical CT.

This study aimed to compare the dose deposited to the lens and thyroid outside the imaged volume between 40-mm and 80-mm collimation during thoracic paediatric helical CT.

Methods

Computed tomography scanning parameters

Two paediatric anthropomorphic phantoms (ATOM Phantom, CIRS, Norfolk, VA) representing newborns and 5-year-olds were used in this study (Fig. 1). The weight and height of the newborn were assumed to be 3.5 kg and 51.0 cm, respectively, and those of the 5-year-old were assumed to be 19.0 kg and 110.0 cm, respectively.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Newborn (a) and 5-year-old (b) anthropometric phantoms (ATOM Phantom, CIRS, Norfolk) show the positioning of the optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter attachments

Paediatric anthropomorphic phantoms were scanned using a clinical helical scanner (Revolution CT, GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI) from above the apex of the lung to below the diaphragm. The scan range was 160 mm (Fig. 2). The scanning area was configured to avoid direct imaging of the thyroid gland. The scanning parameters were as follows: helical mode, beam collimation of 40 mm or 80 mm, section thickness of 5 mm, gantry rotation time of 0.5 s, and 64 × 0.625 mm or 128 × 0.625 mm detector collimation; settings for the small scan field of view of 100-mm matrix size was 512 × 512 for full mode and standard reconstruction kernel. The applied tube voltage was 80 kVp with automatic tube current modulation (noise index 10), and the helical pitches were 0.984 and 0.992 for the 40-mm and 80-mm beam collimations, respectively. The CT images were acquired using filtered back-projection algorithms with a standard kernel/filter.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Scan ranges for the anthropometric phantoms of a newborn (a) and a 5-year-old (b) are shown on scout views

Dosimeters and dose measurement

The optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs) used are commercial nanodot dosimeters (Landauer, Glenwood, IL) with a 5-mm diameter and 0.2-mm thick Al2O3:C disc, and were locally assessed. These discs were encased in a 10 mm × 10 mm × 2 mm light-sealed plastic case to prevent attenuation of the optical signal by light. According to the technical specifications of the OSLDs, the dose operating range is 5 mRad to 1500 rad (50 µGy to 1500 cGy). The lower limit of detection is 5 mRad (50 µGy). The useful energy range is from 5 keV to 20 MeV. Energy dependence is accurate within ± 10% over the diagnostic energy range of 70–140 kVp. The accuracy (total uncertainty, single measurement) is ± 10%. An InLight MicroStar reader (Landauer, Inc.) was used to read the optical signals from the OSLDs. The reader system included an optical annealing unit.

Anthropomorphic phantoms were placed on the CT scanner gantry, and an OSLD was placed on the right and left lenses, front sides of the right and left thyroid, and front sides of the right and left mammary glands, as well as front, back, right, and left sides of the mammary glands (Fig. 1). The mammary glands were in the field of view, and therefore data related to the mammary glands are not included in this study, although we did measure the dose to the mammary glands because they are highly susceptible to radiation-induced cancer. To ensure consistency in the placement of the discs for different scans, the dosimeters were affixed by a single researcher (T.M.) with 27 years of experience in CT. The OSLDs were affixed to paediatric anthropomorphic phantoms which were then consecutively scanned five times. Three sets of five consecutive scans (15 scans in total) were performed to mitigate errors from individual scans. The total dose acquired from five consecutive scans was divided by five to determine the average dose per scan. After each of the five consecutive scans, the OSLDs were replaced. During the helical scan, the measured doses deposited outside the imaged volumes were compared for each phantom between the 40-mm and 80-mm detector widths.

We comprehensively analysed radiation doses involving a 10-cm ionisation chamber and CT dose index volume (CTDIvol) obtained from the dose displayed on the console of our CT equipment. Furthermore, we extended our scrutiny to encompass a comparison of radiation doses using the 10-cm ionisation chamber and OSLDs when exposed to X-rays from general radiographic equipment. This evaluation was motivated by the need to assess the reliability of OSLDs.

Measurement of image noise and statistical analysis

For all paediatric phantoms, we measured the image noise (standard deviation [SD] of the CT number) at the level of the mammary gland in the centre of the scan range within a circumscribed 10.0-mm diameter region of interest (Fig. 3). For each scan, we measured the image noise five times at five peripheral and central points. The mean value of the SD of the CT number was calculated, and the image noise was compared for collimations of 40 mm and 80 mm.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Regions of interest measured for image noise in anthropomorphic newborn (a) and 5-year-old (b) phantoms

The Mann–Whitney U test was used to analyse the dose deposited outside the imaged volume values for both phantoms. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using the free statistical software “R” (R, version 3.2.2; R Project for Statistical Computing; http://www.r-project.org/).

Results

The doses deposited outside the imaged volume measured for both phantoms and collimations are summarised in Table 1 and Supplementary Material 1. Significant differences were observed in the dose deposited to the lens and thyroid between the 40- and 80-mm collimations for both phantoms (P < 0.01). However, there were no significant differences in CTDIvol between the 40- and 80-mm collimations for both phantoms (Table 1).

Table 1 Scatter radiation doses (median and interquartile range) for newborn and 5-year-old anthropomorphic phantoms measured using 40-mm and 80-mm collimation during helical computed tomography scans of the thoracic region

There were no significant differences in image noise between 40-mm and 80-mm collimation on helical scans in newborns and 5-year-olds (P = 0.11 and 0.14, respectively) (Table 2).

Table 2 Image noise (standard deviation of computed tomography (CT) Hounsfield units averaged over selected region of interest) for 5-mm slice thickness at the level of the mammary glands, from thoracic helical (CT) scans of newborn and 5-year-old anthropomorphic phantoms using 40- and 80-mm collimation

Discussion

This phantom study has shown that in newborns and 5-year-olds , the dose deposited outside the imaged volume (to the lens and thyroid gland) during thoracic helical CT, is significantly higher with 80-mm compared to 40-mm collimation.

Notably, our results show that compared with the 80-mm collimation, 40-mm collimation reduces paediatric lens doses. Deak et al. [27] reported that a substantial dose reduction was achieved for cardiac and thoracic CT using adaptive section collimation when measurements were performed in free air and phantoms. However, this effect increases with the number of detector rows, such as the function of the 40-mm collimation with less Z-plane over scanning unlike that of the 80-mm collimation.

During helical scanning, the dose deposited outside the imaged volume (to the lens) decreases with age. This phenomenon is attributed to the fact that the larger the body size, the wider the distance between the scanning position and the lens. Our results showed no difference in image noise from the 80-mm collimation with helical scanning compared to that with the 40-mm collimation. With regard to lens doses and image quality, we believe that 80-mm collimation for helical scanning is more effective in older patients, while 40-mm collimation for helical scanning is more effective in younger patients.

Overscanning and overranging are well researched [28]. Manufacturers have different approaches for reducing radiation exposure, such as the helical reconstruction algorithm, additional filters, and sequential exposure to avoid lens irradiation [28]. The direct visualisation on the scout view of the possible surface-exposed region must also be stressed in daily practice. It is important to understand and use the various types of overscanning and ranging techniques.

In the assessment of complex cardiac malformations, motion artefacts affect image quality. It has been reported [29] that the accuracy of CT with a 40-detector-row CT scanner in diagnosing separate cardiovascular anomalies is 98%. High-speed scans with an 80-detector-row CT scanner are necessary for coronary artery- and sedation-free cases; however, dose reduction may be a better consideration in general congenital heart disease cases.

The scan range in children is shorter than that in adults, which leads to a reduced scan time. Consequently, even with shorter collimation in contrast enhancement examinations, the impact on contrast enhancement is expected to be minimal. Theoretically, a shorter collimation can be applied to CT with contrast agent injections in children.

According to our results, 40-mm beam collimation was able to reduce the absorbed thyroid dose. The absorbed dose with the 80-mm beam collimation was significantly higher than that with the 40-mm beam collimation. The 40-mm beam collimation reduced the out-of-field absorbed doses compared with the in-field absorbed dose. By using 40-mm beam collimation, it is possible to reduce the absorbed doses of the thyroid compared to the absorbed thyroid doses observed for 80-mm beam collimation during paediatric thoracic helical CT.

Our study has some limitations. We used anthropomorphic phantoms of a newborn and a 5-year-old to focus on routine and follow-up studies in paediatric patients. Our study used a CT scanner manufactured by a single manufacturer. The relationship between tube voltage, image noise, radiation dose, and phantom size may depend, to a certain degree, on CT scanner specifications, which may vary between manufacturers. To screen for congenital heart disease, our focus was exclusively on thoracic CT scans. Most paediatric scans are performed with a 3-mm slice thickness; we used a 5-mm slice thickness. Further studies with a slice thickness of 3 mm are required to confirm our hypothesis.

Conclusion

Compared with that observed for the 80-mm collimation, the dose deposited outside the imaged volume (to the lens and thyroid) was significantly lower in newborn and 5-year-old phantoms with 40-mm collimation during thoracic helical CT scans.