Abstract
Mediastinal masses are commonly identified in the pediatric population with cross-sectional imaging central to the diagnosis and management of these lesions. With greater anatomical definition afforded by cross-sectional imaging, classification of mediastinal masses into the traditional anterior, middle and posterior mediastinal compartments — as based on the lateral chest radiograph — has diminishing application. In recent years, the International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group (ITMIG) classification system of mediastinal masses, which is cross-sectionally based, has garnered acceptance by multiple thoracic societies and been applied in adults. Therefore, there is a need for pediatric radiologists to clearly understand the ITMIG classification system and how it applies to the pediatric population. The main purpose of this article is to provide an updated review of common pediatric mediastinal masses and mediastinal manifestations of systemic disease processes in the pediatric population based on the new ITMIG classification system.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Mediastinal masses are frequently encountered in the pediatric population, and imaging evaluation is the cornerstone of accurate diagnosis and management of pediatric mediastinal masses [1,2,3]. Traditionally, mediastinal masses have been classified into lesions of the anterior, middle and posterior mediastinum, which are historical compartments defined by anatomical landmarks on the lateral chest radiograph. However, there is no clear consensus on the anatomical definition of the mediastinal compartments, and mediastinal compartmental division varies among radiologists, anatomists and clinicians [4]. This often results in different classification schemes and terminology, and confusion. With the advent of widely available cross-sectional imaging, which provides precise and defined imaging characterization, the diagnosis, staging and surgical planning for mediastinal masses has outgrown the original anatomical landmarks of the lateral chest radiograph.
The International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group (ITMIG) introduced a new classification system based on anatomical cross-sectional imaging in 2014. Since then, the new classification scheme had gained acceptance by multiple societies, including the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC), the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) [4, 5]. Consequently, there is a need for pediatric radiologists to clearly understand the ITMIG classification system and how it applies to the pediatric population, specifically in the imaging evaluation of mediastinal masses, which are common in children. The aim of this article is to provide an updated review of common pediatric mediastinal masses and mediastinal manifestations of systemic disease processes in the pediatric population based on the new ITMIG classification system.
The International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group classification system
Developed from a database of 10,000 patients, the ITMIG classification system divides the mediastinum into three compartments: pre-vascular, visceral and paravertebral [4]. These partitions are not dissimilar to the anterior, middle and posterior mediastinal compartments defined by lateral chest radiography. However, the ITMIG compartments have the added anatomical precision provided by cross-sectional imaging. In comparison to the four-compartment model proposed by the Japanese Association for Research of the Thymus (JART), which is more complex and includes non-anatomical partitioning of the mediastinum into superior and inferior components, the ITMIG system is purely anatomically based [6]. In addition, the ITMIG system provides a detailed division of lymph node stations for aggressive tumors, such as thymic carcinomas, which can assist in staging (although this might be more applicable to the adult population) [4, 5].
Practical approach to new classification system for children
Although pediatric mediastinal masses are likely to be first encountered on chest radiograph because of the greater use of radiography as a first imaging modality in the pediatric population, further characterization is nearly always performed with cross-sectional imaging, such as CT or MRI. Application of the new ITMIG model to pediatric mediastinal masses often shows similar classification of disease processes and entities in the pre-vascular (anterior) and paravertebral (posterior) compartments (Fig. 1). However, major advancements have been made in the understanding of disorders and manifestations of systemic disease in the visceral (middle) mediastinum in the pediatric population. These include underlying genetic mutations such as nuclear protein of the testis (NUT) cell carcinoma and dedicator of cytokinesis 8 (DOCK8) deficiency, as well as disorders related to adjacent mediastinal vascular structure such as pulmonary vein stenosis (Table 1).
Spectrum of pediatric mediastinal masses
Pre-vascular (anterior) mediastinal compartment
Most anterior mediastinal masses in the pediatric population arise from the following origins: thymus (thymic hyperplasia, thymic cyst, thymoma and thymolipoma), germ cell (seminomas and non-seminomatous germ cell tumor, including teratoma), lymphocyte (Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas), vessel (infantile hemangioma and venous malformation) and lymphatic (lymphatic malformation), which are discussed in the following sections.
Thymic hyperplasia
Thymic hyperplasia, or thymic rebound, is defined as an increase in thymic size in response to stress, medications (e.g., chemotherapy, immunotherapy and corticosteroids) or autoimmune conditions. True thymic hyperplasia demonstrates preserved histological architecture, whereas lymphoid thymic hyperplasia is characterized by increased lymphoid follicles and is more commonly associated with autoimmune conditions, such as myasthenia gravis and vasculitides [7]. Differentiation among thymic hyperplasia subtypes is not as clinically important as discerning thymic hyperplasia from thymic malignancies.
Because of its superior soft-tissue characterization capability, MRI is often used to evaluate thymic hyperplasia after CT, which often demonstrates nonspecific thymic enlargement (Fig. 2). On MRI, the normal pediatric thymus is well circumscribed and demonstrates homogeneous T2 hyperintensity and mild uniform enhancement [8]. Thymic hyperplasia might surround and encase adjacent structures, but demonstrates little mass effect [8]. Thymic enlargement regresses with alleviation of precipitating stress or immunomodulation.
Thymic cyst
Thymic cysts can be congenital, acquired following chemotherapy, or in parallel with other thymic tumors. Thymic cysts are typically found along the thymopharyngeal tract — a remnant formed after involution of the third pharyngobranchial duct located between the pharynx and thymus. Although often asymptomatic and incidentally discovered, affected children might present with dysphagia, respiratory distress or vocal cord paralysis if thymic cysts are sufficiently large.
Thymic cysts are usually unilocular with variable CT attenuation depending on the degree of proteinaceous or hemorrhagic contents. On MRI, thymic cysts are typically well-circumscribed and markedly T2-hyperintense, with variable T1 signal depending on cystic contents [9] (Fig. 3). MRI is valuable for detecting internal solid enhancing components that might point to an alternative diagnosis. However, complex thymic cysts might also demonstrate enhancing mural nodularity or thickened septa [9]. In such cases, MRI can be useful to guide recommendations and clinical decisions including serial imaging, evaluation with a different imaging modality, or even tissue sampling based on MR imaging appearance. Multiloculated thymic cysts are sometimes associated with autoimmune conditions and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) [10].
Thymoma
Thymomas are rare epithelial neoplasms in the pediatric population, only accounting for 1–2% of pediatric mediastinal tumors [3]. There are two types of thymomas: noninvasive and invasive. Invasive thymoma is typically larger, with irregular contours, necrosis and heterogeneous enhancement. Local invasiveness can extend into the adjacent pleural and chest wall. Most thymomas are asymptomatic; however, 40% have been associated with paraneoplastic syndromes, most frequently myasthenia gravis [3].
On CT, thymoma typically appears as a well-circumscribed, mildly enhancing pre-vascular (anterior) mediastinal mass, occasionally with a thin calcified capsule [3]. On MRI, thymoma is usually mildly T2-hyperintense and enhancing, without signal loss on out-of-phase MR imaging (Fig. 4). Treatment is typically surgical resection, with a higher risk of recurrence in the invasive subtype.
Thymolipoma
Thymolipomas are rare, benign mediastinal masses composed of remnant thymic tissue interspersed within macroscopic fat. They demonstrate slow, progressive growth and greater pliability than other pre-vascular (anterior) mediastinal masses. As such, most thymolipomas are discovered incidentally with large size at diagnosis. On CT and MRI, thymolipoma typically appears as a well-defined mass with non-enhancing soft tissue and septa interspersed throughout fat, often in a whorled configuration [3] (Fig. 5). Treatment is often only considered when affected children are symptomatic from adjacent mass effect.
Seminoma
Seminomas are a type of germ cell tumor that typically arises from the testis. The two most common extra-gonadal locations for seminomas include the mediastinum and retroperitoneum [11]. However, in the context of all pediatric mediastinal tumors, mediastinal seminomas are very rare. Unlike other germ cell tumors that produce both alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hcg), pure seminomas do not produce AFP.
On CT and MRI, seminoma, similar to most other germ cell tumors, appears as a poorly circumscribed and heterogeneous mass with solid and cystic components, often with local invasion [11] (Fig. 6). Unlike teratomas, which are discussed later, calcifications are rare, but when present they tend to be stippled or rim-like [12]. Pure mediastinal seminomas are usually curable with chemotherapy alone [13].
Teratoma (non-seminomatous germ cell tumors)
Non-seminomatous germ cell tumors include teratomas, yolk sac tumors, embryonal carcinomas, choriocarcinomas and mixed histological types. Among them, teratomas are the most common mediastinal non-seminomatous germ cell tumors, comprising approximately 60% of cases [3]. Children with Klinefelter syndrome (47, XXY genotype) are 19 times more likely to develop mediastinal non-seminomatous germ cell tumors [14].
On imaging, a teratoma typically appears as a well-circumscribed, often heterogeneous mass, with variable fat, cystic and calcified components, which can help differentiate teratoma from other mediastinal masses. The presence of a fat-fluid level or calcified components, such as teeth, on CT is pathognomonic [12] (Fig. 7). Hypointensity on T1-W imaging with fat suppression at MRI might help to support the presence of macroscopic fat when this is less clear on CT. It might not be possible to differentiate between immature and mature teratomas on the basis of imaging alone because of their shared imaging characteristics. However, the presence of irregular-shape and invasive solid tissue has been associated more with the immature subtype [1]. Immature teratomas, as opposed to mature types, demonstrate local recurrence after excision in up to a third of cases because of the presence of malignant germ cell components [1].
Lymphoma (Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas)
Lymphomas are the third most common pediatric malignancy and the most common malignant mediastinal mass. Both Hodgkin lymphoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) occur in children, but they have different age and location predilections. For example, Hodgkin lymphoma, which is often associated with Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) infection, typically occurs in children older than 10 years and mainly in the chest [3]. Pediatric patients with Hodgkin lymphoma might present with B symptoms (fever, night sweats and weight loss), especially in the classic subtype, or compressive symptoms secondary to mass effect from extensive bulky adenopathy. In contrast, NHL more commonly affects children younger than 10 years and often affects both the chest and abdomen [3]. NHL can be further classified into four subtypes: diffuse large B cell lymphoma, Burkitt lymphoma, anaplastic lymphoma and lymphoblastic lymphoma [15, 16].
On imaging, both Hodgkin lymphoma and NHL typically appear as a bulky, heterogeneous, lobulated pre-vascular (anterior) mediastinal mass with a tendency to displace adjacent structures (Fig. 8). Hodgkin lymphoma has a greater incidence of intrathoracic involvement compared to NHL (85% vs. 50%) [3]. Prior to treatment, lymph node conglomerates in lymphoma rarely calcify. After treatment, calcification occurs in up to 5% of cases [3]. Hodgkin lymphoma can also present with pulmonary findings, including multiple pulmonary nodules, multifocal consolidations, and sometimes (15%) pleural effusions [3]. Currently, positron emission tomography (PET)/CT is the mainstay for evaluating treatment response.
Treatment of mediastinal lymphoma in children typically includes chemotherapy, sometimes in combination with immunotherapy and radiotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma and bone marrow transplantation for NHL. Prognosis is good, with 5-year survival rates of 90% for Hodgkin lymphoma and 70–85% for NHL [16].
Infantile hemangioma
Infantile hemangiomas are vascular neoplasms containing proliferative endothelium that affect 4–10% of children [17]. These benign vascular tumors typically arise and grow rapidly in the early proliferative phase within the first 3 months after birth [18]. More gradual growth occurs in months 5–8, leading into the plateau phase. Involution typically follows by the first year of age and can continue for several years [18]. Infantile hemangiomas occur in all tissues except bone and rarely occur as a pre-vascular (anterior) mediastinal mass.
On US, infantile hemangiomas appear as highly vascular, well-delineated masses with large feeding and draining vessels. At MRI, hemangiomas appear T1-isointense to muscle and markedly T2-hyperintense with marked uniform enhancement after contrast administration.
Venous malformation
Unlike infantile hemangiomas, venous malformations are present at birth, albeit sometimes undiscovered until later into adulthood. The incidence of venous malformations in the mediastinum is rare. Most venous malformations are found in the head and neck and 30% in the torso [19]. Similar to infantile hemangiomas, venous malformations are vascular lesions characterized by the presence of an endothelium. However, venous malformations demonstrate slow flow, sometimes contain phleboliths, and connect to the central venous system. Enhancement patterns vary widely in uniformity, intensity and timing, necessitating multiphasic imaging [19].
Lymphatic malformation
Lymphatic malformations arise from failure of lymphatic channels to connect to the central venous system. Lymphatic malformations can be classified as macrocystic (>1 cm), microcystic (<1 cm) or a combination. Similar to venous malformations, these lesions most commonly occur in the head, neck and axilla, with a minority (10%) arising in the mediastinum [20].
On MRI, macrocystic components appear as multiseptated proteinaceous cysts that exert mass effect on adjacent structures [20]. Conversely, microcystic components can appear solid. MRI evaluation of lymphatic malformations demonstrates T2 hyperintensity with variable T1 signal intensity based on intrinsic proteinaceous and hemorrhagic makeup (Fig. 9). Unlike infantile hemangiomas or venous malformations, macrocystic lymphatic malformations do not demonstrate internal enhancement, though septations typically demonstrate mild enhancement.
Visceral (middle) mediastinal compartment
Foregut duplication cyst
Foregut duplication cysts comprise of bronchogenic, enteric and neurenteric cysts and collectively account for 10–11% of all mediastinal masses in the pediatric population [2, 21]. Most are found incidentally, but they can manifest with compressive symptoms such as dysphagia, dyspnea or chest pain. Bronchogenic cysts are most common, followed by enteric cysts. Bronchogenic cysts result from abnormal budding of the tracheobronchial tree and typically occur at the pre- or subcarinal stations [1]. Enteric cysts result from abnormal development of the posterior foregut and appear as a mass near the esophagus. Neurenteric cysts develop from a failure of foregut separation from the neural crest cells and can be differentiated from the other foregut duplication cysts based on their location in the paravertebral (posterior) compartment.
On CT, all three types of foregut duplication cyst typically appear as well-circumscribed round or oval cystic masses (Fig. 10). However, about half have proteinaceous or hemorrhagic internal components resulting in higher attenuation and might mimic a solid lesion [3]. In this situation, MRI evaluation can be helpful for characterization because marked T2 hyperintensity of foregut duplication cysts without contrast enhancement confirms the cystic nature of this lesion. Alternatively, dual-energy contrast-enhanced CT with virtual non-contrast reconstructions or single-energy CT with pre- and post-contrast imaging can be used to confirm lack of enhancement. Thickened walls with or without thick rim enhancement can suggest superinfection [22]. Treatment involves complete resection for symptomatic children.
Infectious lymphadenopathy
Infectious mediastinal lymph node enlargement is seen in a wide variety of underlying etiologies including tuberculosis, fungal infections and bacterial pneumonias. Infectious lymphadenopathy is commonly found in conjunction with lung abnormalities (Fig. 11). For example, tuberculosis-related mediastinal lymphadenopathy is often associated with tree-in-bud-type pulmonary nodules and consolidation. Mediastinal lymphadenopathy related to fungal infection is often associated with pulmonary nodules that are often calcified. Antimicrobial therapy for the underlying infection is the mainstay of treatment.
Primary neoplastic lymphadenopathy
Lymphoma is the most common cause of primary neoplastic lymphadenopathy in the visceral (middle) mediastinum in the pediatric population. Often lymphadenopathy arises from the pre-vascular (anterior) mediastinum. Imaging characteristics are nonspecific and can appear as homogeneously or heterogeneously enlarged lymph nodes or extensive nodal conglomerates. Calcifications might reflect treatment changes.
Metastatic lymphadenopathy
Metastatic mediastinal lymphadenopathy in the pediatric population most commonly occurs secondary to Wilms tumors, sarcomas or primary testicular neoplasms. Pediatric metastatic mediastinal lymphadenopathy typically presents as a heterogeneous soft-tissue mass with contrast enhancement (Fig. 12). Associated calcification is often seen in osteosarcoma metastases, although treatment-related calcification occurs in other malignancies.
Castleman disease
Castleman disease is a rare lymphoproliferative disorder with two subtypes that are broadly categorized by sites of involvement. Unicentric disease is more common (75%) than multicentric disease (25%) in children [23]. A form of multicentric disease is associated with human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8), although this is very rare in the pediatric population [23, 24]. Contrary to adults, mediastinal involvement of Castleman disease is relatively less common, occurring in 11% of unicentric and 16% of multicentric disease [23]. On histology, two main subtypes predominate: the hyaline–vascular type (90%) and plasma cell type [24].
On CT, unicentric Castleman disease typically appears as a high-attenuating solitary oval or round mediastinal or hilar mass that demonstrates homogeneous hyperenhancement relative to muscle (Fig. 13). Associated calcifications are rare. MRI characteristics include T1 iso- to hyperintensity relative to muscle and T2 hyperintensity [23]. Diffuse contrast enhancement is particularly evident in the hyaline–vascular subtype. Lesions are typically 18FDG-PET-avid [23].
Sarcoidosis
Pediatric sarcoidosis is a rare multisystemic granulomatous disease [25]. When manifesting in children, sarcoidosis most commonly affects the lungs and lymph nodes. Two distinct presentations exist in children. Older children (>5 years) typically present with nonspecific constitutional symptoms such as low-grade fever and malaise, whereas early onset childhood sarcoidosis (<5 years) is characterized by a triad of rash, uveitis and arthritis [26,27,28,29]. Compared to adults, pediatric mediastinal lymphadenopathy secondary to sarcoidosis is far rarer, with about one-tenth the incidence, or 0.22–1 in 100,000 [25, 30].
On imaging of pediatric sarcoidosis, pulmonary findings are scored based on chest radiography, with stage I disease (isolated bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy) the most common (71%). Pulmonary infiltrates with hilar adenopathy (stage II), without hilar adenopathy (stage III) and fibrosis (stage IV) are less common at radiography [26].
Computed tomography remains the gold standard for children requiring further evaluation. At CT, sarcoidosis can appear as lymphadenopathy accompanied by pulmonary nodules; pleural, fissure or interlobular thickening; ground-glass opacities; bronchiectasis; or pulmonary cysts. Some studies have shown promising use of fast-acquisition contrast-enhanced lung MRI for evaluating and surveilling children with sarcoidosis, with comparable detection of stages I, II and IV disease [31,32,33]. Lung MRI has been found to be similar to CT except for detection of subtle ground-glass opacities, mild bronchiectasis and nodules smaller than 3 mm [31]. Treatment typically involves corticosteroids with good outcomes.
NUT carcinoma
NUT carcinomas, formerly called NUT midline carcinomas, are a very rare distinct entity of poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma [34,35,36]. They are considered highly aggressive tumors in children and young adults, with an average survival from time of diagnosis of 6.7 months [37]. Development of NUT carcinoma is idiopathic, but genetically results from rearrangement of the nuclear protein in testis (NUT) gene on chromosome 15q14 [38]. In approximately 66% of cases, the NUT gene is fused to the BRD4 gene, resulting in a BRD4–NUT fusion oncogene [38]. NUT carcinomas arise 51% of the time in the thorax, 41% in the head and neck, 6% in bone or soft tissue and 1% elsewhere [37]. Affected children often present with symptoms related to regional mass effect from the tumor.
On CT, primary thoracic NUT carcinoma appears as a relatively low attenuating, heterogeneously enhancing infiltrative visceral (middle) mediastinal mass, which can exert mass effect on local structures (e.g., resulting in lobar collapse) or direct invasion [39,40,41] (Fig. 14). Mediastinal and hilar adenopathy and pleural involvement, in the form of effusions and nodular thickening, are frequently found [41]. Calcifications are sometimes seen [42]. The superior soft-tissue resolution of MRI can help to delineate neurovascular or chest wall invasion. FDG-avid lytic osseous lesions are the most common form of metastasis. PET/CT is central to monitoring treatment response.
Pulmonary vein stenosis
Primary pulmonary vein stenosis is a rare entity with an incidence of approximately 2 in 100,000 children [43,44,45,46]. Unlike secondary pulmonary vein stenosis, which is a well-described complication following surgical correction of anomalous pulmonary venous return and radiofrequency ablation in children and adults, primary pulmonary vein stenosis is idiopathic, less well understood, and difficult to diagnose [47].
In addition to characteristic angiographic findings, primary pulmonary vein stenosis can present with prominent extravascular thoracic findings, including a mediastinal mass along the course of the pulmonary veins (93%), ground-glass opacities (93%), interlobular septal thickening (33%) and pleural thickening (93%) [47]. Specifically, mediastinal masses associated with primary pulmonary vein stenosis have been described as well-defined, non-calcified, heterogeneously enhancing lesions following the contour of the atretic pulmonary veins (Fig. 15). The pathophysiology underlying the development of these mediastinal masses in the setting of primary pulmonary vein stenosis is not well understood; however, it is postulated to be the underlying fibrointimal myxoid proliferation seen on some histopathological samples [48]. Alone, a mediastinal mass has low specificity for primary pulmonary vein stenosis, but its presence in conjunction with characteristic pulmonary and angiographic findings can help to solidify the diagnosis of primary pulmonary vein stenosis.
Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) haploinsufficiency and lipopolysaccharide-responsive and beige-like anchor protein (LRBA) deficiency
Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) haploinsufficiency and lipopolysaccharide-responsive and beige-like anchor protein (LRBA) deficiency are rare entities on the spectrum of immunodeficiency syndromes that were previously under the umbrella diagnosis of common variable immune deficiency [49, 50]. Clinical features include autoimmune cytopenias, enteropathy, lymphoproliferative infiltration and pulmonary manifestations including recurrent infection [51,52,53,54].
At CT, these immunodeficiency syndromes demonstrate a characteristic constellation of findings including bronchiectasis, ground-glass opacities, interstitial thickening, pulmonary nodules and visceral (middle) mediastinal lymphadenopathy [51, 54,55,56,57] (Fig. 16). While evaluation of these entities is limited to case series, trends demonstrate a greater extent of pulmonary disease and mediastinal lymphadenopathy in children with LRBA deficiency than in those with CTLA-4 haploinsufficiency [57].
Dedicator of cytokinesis 8 (DOCK8) gene mutation
Dedicator of cytokinesis 8 (DOCK8) deficiency is a rare autosomal-recessive form of hyperimmunoglobinemia E syndrome [58,59,60,61]. The true prevalence is unknown, but as of 2021 approximately 230 cases had been reported, particularly in regions with high consanguinity [60, 62,63,64]. Given that DOCK8 is a regulator of T cells and B cells, DOCK8 deficiency presents in early childhood as immunological titer derangements, frequent infections (usually pulmonary) and increased susceptibility to atypical viral and fungal infections [58,59,60, 62, 64]. Consequently, children with DOCK8 deficiency demonstrate a progressive decline in overall survival, with 87% alive at age 10, but only 37% by age 30 [59]. Familiarity with the imaging characteristics of DOCK8 deficiency can facilitate prompt diagnosis.
On CT, a series of 17 children with DOCK8 deficiency demonstrated visceral (middle) mediastinal adenopathy in 64% and both mediastinal and hilar adenopathy in 18% of the children [65] (Fig. 17). Mediastinal adenopathy was frequently seen in conjunction with a constellation of pulmonary findings including bronchiectasis (65%), ground-glass opacities (53%) and pulmonary nodules (24%) [65]. Bronchiectasis typically has a middle lung zone predominance (73%), whereas ground-glass opacities and pulmonary nodules are uniformly distributed [65] (Fig. 17).
Paravertebral (posterior) mediastinal compartment
Neuroblastoma, ganglioneuroblastoma and ganglioneuroma
Neuroblastomas, ganglioneuroblastomas and ganglioneuromas are all sympathetic ganglion tumors arising from primordial neural crest cells. Neuroblastomas account for 10% of all childhood cancers and commonly arise from the adrenal glands, but can be found anywhere along the sympathetic chain, including the paravertebral (posterior) mediastinum in 14–20% of cases [66]. Most affected children present by 4 years of age with nonspecific constitutional symptoms, such as anemia, and sometimes symptoms of spinal cord compression if there is aggressive local spinal canal invasion [66].
Ganglioneuroblastomas are considered a transitional tumor on the spectrum of sympathetic ganglion tumors, where ganglioneuromas are benign, neuroblastomas, are malignant and ganglioneuroblastomas have malignant transformation potential.
On MRI, differentiation among the three types of ganglion tumors is near impossible because of their similar imaging characteristics. These tumors typically appear as well-marginated, lobulated T1-hypointense and T2-hyperintense masses, sometimes with susceptibility artifact from calcifications [67] (Figs. 18, 19 and 20). Differences in cellularity and degrees of hemorrhage and necrosis contribute to variable diffusion restriction and enhancement patterns. Neuroblastomas are soft and amorphic tumors that tend to encase local structures and extend into the neuroforamina, whereas the other tumors are sometimes described as more discretely fusiform. Relatively older median age of presentation (10 years) might also help differentiate ganglioneuroblastomas and ganglioneuromas from neuroblastomas. Nuclear imaging might also be helpful because 90% of neuroblastomas, but only 57% of ganglioneuromas are avid on iodine-123 and 131-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) imaging [68, 69]. Histopathological diagnosis is, however, ultimately needed for confirmation.
Schwannoma and neurofibroma
Schwannomas are the more common benign peripheral nerve sheath tumors (PNSTs) and are associated with neurofibromatosis type 2 [70, 71]. Conversely, neurofibromas have an association with neurofibromatosis type 1 [70]. Benign PNSTs are indistinguishable on imaging alone. They appear as smooth, lobulated, well-defined paraspinal masses, with adjacent osseous erosion or remodeling in 50% of cases at CT [70, 72]. Splaying of the ribs with a “split fat” sign might also be seen [73]. Calcifications are rare, but more common among neurofibromas. At MRI, neurofibromas have high signal intensity on T2-weighted imaging, low to intermediate T1 signal relative to muscle, and are avidly enhancing (Fig. 21). A “target” sign characterized by central hypointensity on T2-weighted sequences is more commonly associated with, but not exclusive to, neurofibromas [74]. Extension into the spinal canal can give a “dumbbell” configuration. Lack of MIBG avidity differentiates PNSTs from neuroblastomas, whereas high FDG PET metabolic activity distinguishes these tumors from malignant PNSTs with 95% sensitivity and 72% specificity [75].
Extramedullary hematopoiesis
Extramedullary hematopoiesis most commonly presents as a thoracic paraspinal mass after hepatosplenomegaly and is associated with chronic hemolytic anemias, such as thalassemia and sickle cell disease [76]. Masses are typically well-marginated and are usually bilateral and heterogeneously attenuating with macroscopic fat at CT [76, 77]. Associated calcifications are rare. On MRI, there are variable T1, T2 and contrast-enhancement patterns because of the degree of fat (Fig. 22). While there might be a “split rib” sign, there is typically no osseous erosion.
Conclusion
Imaging evaluation is critical to the diagnosis and management of pediatric mediastinal masses. The ITMIG framework, compared to the traditional radiographic segmentation, allows for more specific and standardized diagnosis of mediastinal disease processes, including rare systemic pathologies with thoracic presentation. With greater utilization of cross-sectional imaging, the ITMIG paradigm also provides the opportunity for greater precision in treatment planning and evaluation of treatment response, which has potential to improve patient outcomes.
References
Acharya PT, Ali S, Stanescu AL et al (2019) Pediatric mediastinal masses. Magn Reson Imaging Clin North Am 27:227–242
Lee EY (2009) Evaluation of non-vascular mediastinal masses in infants and children: an evidence-based practical approach. Pediatr Radiol 39:184–190
Ranganath SH, Lee EY, Restrepo R, Eisenberg RL (2012) Mediastinal masses in children. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198:W197–W216
Carter BW, Tomiyama N, Bhora FY et al (2014) A modern definition of mediastinal compartments. J Thorac Oncol 9:S97–S101
Thacker PG, Mahani MG, Lee EY (2015) Imaging evaluation of mediastinal masses in children and adults. J Thorac Imaging 30:21
Fujimoto K, Hara M, Tomiyama N et al (2014) Proposal for a new mediastinal compartment classification of transverse plane images according to the Japanese Association for Research on the Thymus (JART) general rules for the study of mediastinal tumors. Oncol Rep 31:565–572
Nasseri F, Eftekhari F (2010) Clinical and radiologic review of the normal and abnormal thymus: pearls and pitfalls. Radiographics 30:413–428
Tian L, Cai P-Q, Cui C-Y et al (2015) Reactive thymic hyperplasia following chemotherapy for children with lymphoma: computed tomography may be able to provide valuable information to avoid over-treatment. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 47:883–889
Takahashi K, Al-Janabi NJ (2010) Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of mediastinal tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging 32:1325–1339
Hamza A, Weissferdt A (2019) Non-neoplastic and benign tumoral lesions of the thymic gland: a review and update. Adv Anat Pathol 26:257–269
Ueno T, Tanaka YO, Nagata M et al (2004) Spectrum of germ cell tumors: from head to toe. Radiographics 24:387–404
Rosado-de-Christenson ML, Templeton PA, Moran CA (1992) From the archives of the AFIP. Mediastinal germ cell tumors: radiologic and pathologic correlation. Radiographics 12:1013–1030
Bishop MA, Kyriakopoulos C (2021) Mediastinal seminoma. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island
Williams LA, Pankratz N, Lane J et al (2018) Klinefelter syndrome in males with germ cell tumors: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Cancer 124:3900–3908
Toma P, Granata C, Rossi A, Garaventa A (2007) Multimodality imaging of Hodgkin disease and non-Hodgkin lymphomas in children. Radiographics 27:1335–1354
Averill LW, Acikgoz G, Miller RE et al (2013) Update on pediatric leukemia and lymphoma imaging. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 34:578–599
Wassef M, Blei F, Adams D et al (2015) Vascular anomalies classification: recommendations from the International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies. Pediatrics 136:e203–e214
Chamli A, Aggarwal P, Jamil RT, Litaiem N (2021) Hemangioma. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island
Olivieri B, White CL, Restrepo R et al (2016) Low-flow vascular malformation pitfalls: from clinical examination to practical imaging evaluation — part 2, venous malformation mimickers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 206:952–962
Johnson AB, Richter GT (2018) Vascular anomalies. Clin Perinatol 45:737–749
Lee E (2017) Pediatric radiology: practical imaging evaluation of infants and children. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
Jeung M-Y, Gasser B, Gangi A et al (2002) Imaging of cystic masses of the mediastinum. Radiographics 22:S79–S93
Sopfe J, Endres A, Campbell K et al (2019) Castleman disease in pediatrics: insights on presentation, treatment, and outcomes from a two-site retrospective cohort study. Pediatr Blood Cancer 66:e27613
Bonekamp D, Horton KM, Hruban RH, Fishman EK (2011) Castleman disease: the great mimic. Radiographics 31:1793–1807
Shetty AK, Gedalia A (2008) Childhood sarcoidosis: a rare but fascinating disorder. Pediatr Rheumatol 6:16
Hoffmann AL, Milman N, Byg KE (2004) Childhood sarcoidosis in Denmark 1979–1994: incidence, clinical features and laboratory results at presentation in 48 children. Acta Paediatr 93:30–36
Lindsley CB, Petty RE (2000) Overview and report on international registry of sarcoid arthritis in childhood. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2:343–348
Pattishall EN, Kendig EL (1996) Sarcoidosis in children. Pediatr Pulmonol 22:195–203
Fink CW, Cimaz R (1997) Early onset sarcoidosis: not a benign disease. J Rheumatol 24:174–177
Nathan N, Sileo C, Calender A et al (2019) Paediatric sarcoidosis. Paediatr Respir Rev 29:53–59
Gorkem SB, Köse S, Lee EY et al (2017) Thoracic MRI evaluation of sarcoidosis in children. Pediatr Pulmonol 52:494–499
Gorkem SB, Coskun A, Yikilmaz A et al (2013) Evaluation of pediatric thoracic disorders: comparison of unenhanced fast-imaging-sequence 1.5-T MRI and contrast-enhanced MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 200:1352–1357
Chung JH, Little BP, Forssen AV et al (2013) Proton MRI in the evaluation of pulmonary sarcoidosis: comparison to chest CT. Eur J Radiol 82:2378–2385
Bauer DE, Mitchell CM, Strait KM et al (2012) Clinicopathologic features and long-term outcomes of NUT midline carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 18:5773–5779
Jung M, Kim S, Lee J et al (2019) Clinicopathological and preclinical findings of NUT carcinoma: a multicenter study. Oncologist 24:e740–e748
French CA (2010) NUT midline carcinoma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 203:16–20
Chau NG, Ma C, Danga K et al (2020) An anatomical site and genetic-based prognostic model for patients with nuclear protein in testis (NUT) midline carcinoma: analysis of 124 patients. JNCI Cancer Spectr 4:pkz094
French CA, Miyoshi I, Kubonishi I et al (2003) BRD4-NUT fusion oncogene: a novel mechanism in aggressive carcinoma. Cancer Res 63:304–307
Bair RJ, Chick JF, Chauhan NR et al (2014) Demystifying NUT midline carcinoma: radiologic and pathologic correlations of an aggressive malignancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203:W391–W399
Nelson BA, Lee EY, Bauer DE (2010) BRD4-NUT carcinoma of the mediastinum in a pediatric patient. J Thorac Imaging 25:4
Virarkar M, Saleh M, Ramani NS et al (2020) Imaging spectrum of NUT carcinomas. Clin Imaging 67:198–206
Sholl LM, Nishino M, Pokharel S et al (2015) Primary pulmonary NUT midline carcinoma: clinical, radiographic, and pathologic characterizations. J Thorac Oncol 10:951–959
Humpl T, Fineman J, Qureshi AM (2021) The many faces and outcomes of pulmonary vein stenosis in early childhood. Pediatr Pulmonol 56:649–655
Backes CH, Nealon E, Armstrong AK et al (2018) Pulmonary vein stenosis in infants: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. J Pediatr 198:36–45.e3
Charlagorla P, Becerra D, Patel PM et al (2016) Congenital pulmonary vein stenosis: encouraging mid-term outcome. Pediatr Cardiol 37:125–130
Drossner DM, Kim DW, Maher KO, Mahle WT (2008) Pulmonary vein stenosis: prematurity and associated conditions. Pediatrics 122:e656–e661
Lee EY, Jenkins KJ, Vargas SO et al (2021) Thoracic multidetector computed tomography angiography of primary pulmonary vein stenosis in children: evaluation of characteristic extravascular findings. J Thorac Imaging 36:318–325
Kovach AE, Magcalas PM, Ireland C et al (2017) Paucicellular fibrointimal proliferation characterizes pediatric pulmonary vein stenosis: clinicopathologic analysis of 213 samples from 97 patients. Am J Surg Pathol 41:1198–1204
Lopez-Herrera G, Tampella G, Pan-Hammarström Q et al (2012) Deleterious mutations in LRBA are associated with a syndrome of immune deficiency and autoimmunity. Am J Hum Genet 90:986–1001
Kuehn HS, Ouyang W, Lo B et al (2014) Immune dysregulation in human subjects with heterozygous germline mutations in CTLA4. Science 345:1623–1627
Alkhairy OK, Abolhassani H, Rezaei N et al (2016) Spectrum of phenotypes associated with mutations in LRBA. J Clin Immunol 36:33–45
Habibi S, Zaki-Dizaji M, Rafiemanesh H et al (2019) Clinical, immunologic, and molecular spectrum of patients with LPS-responsive beige-like anchor protein deficiency: a systematic review. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 7:2379–2386.e5
Schubert D, Bode C, Kenefeck R et al (2014) Autosomal dominant immune dysregulation syndrome in humans with CTLA4 mutations. Nat Med 20:1410–1416
Schwab C, Gabrysch A, Olbrich P et al (2018) Phenotype, penetrance, and treatment of 133 cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4-insufficient subjects. J Allergy Clin Immunol 142:1932–1946
Gámez-Díaz L, August D, Stepensky P et al (2016) The extended phenotype of LPS-responsive beige-like anchor protein (LRBA) deficiency. J Allergy Clin Immunol 137:223–230
Shamriz O, Shadur B, NaserEddin A et al (2018) Respiratory manifestations in LPS-responsive beige-like anchor (LRBA) protein-deficient patients. Eur J Pediatr 177:1163–1172
Krone KA, Winant AJ, Vargas SO et al (2021) Pulmonary manifestations of immune dysregulation in CTLA-4 haploinsufficiency and LRBA deficiency. Pediatr Pulmonol 56:2232–2241
Haskologlu S, Kostel Bal S, Islamoglu C et al (2020) Clinical, immunological features and follow up of 20 patients with dedicator of cytokinesis 8 (DOCK8) deficiency. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 31:515–527
Aydin SE, Kilic SS, Aytekin C et al (2015) DOCK8 deficiency: clinical and immunological phenotype and treatment options — a review of 136 patients. J Clin Immunol 35:189–198
Biggs CM, Keles S, Chatila TA (2017) DOCK8 deficiency: insights into pathophysiology, clinical features and management. Clin Immunol 181:75–82
Su HC (2010) DOCK8 (dedicator of cytokinesis 8) deficiency. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 10:515–520
Engelhardt KR, Gertz ME, Keles S et al (2015) The extended clinical phenotype of 64 patients with dedicator of cytokinesis 8 deficiency. J Allergy Clin Immunol 136:402–412
Engelhardt KR, McGhee S, Winkler S et al (2009) Large deletions and point mutations involving DOCK8 in the autosomal recessive form of the hyper-IgE syndrome. J Allergy Clin Immunol 124:1289
Zhang Q, Davis JC, Lamborn IT et al (2009) Combined immunodeficiency associated with DOCK8 mutations. New Engl J Med 361:2046–2055
Lee EY, Vargas SO, Gaffin JM et al (2021) Thoracic multidetector computed tomography findings of dedicator of cytokinesis 8 deficiency in children. J Thorac Imaging 36:304–309
London WB, Castleberry RP, Matthay KK et al (2005) Evidence for an age cutoff greater than 365 days for neuroblastoma risk group stratification in the Children’s Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 23:6459–6465
Scherer A, Niehues T, Engelbrecht V, Mödder U (2001) Imaging diagnosis of retroperitoneal ganglioneuroma in childhood. Pediatr Radiol 31:106–110
Vik TA, Pfluger T, Kadota R et al (2009) (123)I-mIBG scintigraphy in patients with known or suspected neuroblastoma: results from a prospective multicenter trial. Pediatr Blood Cancer 52:784–790
Geoerger B, Hero B, Harms D et al (2001) Metabolic activity and clinical features of primary ganglioneuromas. Cancer 91:1905–1913
Woo OH, Yong HS, Shin BK et al (2008) Wide spectrum of thoracic neurogenic tumours: a pictorial review of CT and pathological findings. Br J Radiol 81:668–676
Singh AK, Sargar K, Restrepo CS (2016) Pediatric mediastinal tumors and tumor-like lesions. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 37:223–237
Franco A, Mody NS, Meza MP (2005) Imaging evaluation of pediatric mediastinal masses. Radiol Clin N Am 43:325–353
Subhawong TK, Fishman EK, Swart JE et al (2010) Soft-tissue masses and masslike conditions: what does CT add to diagnosis and management? AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1559–1567
Bhargava R, Parham DM, Lasater OE et al (1997) MR imaging differentiation of benign and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors: use of the target sign. Pediatr Radiol 27:124–129
Bredella MA, Torriani M, Hornicek F et al (2007) Value of PET in the assessment of patients with neurofibromatosis type 1. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:928–935
Roberts AS, Shetty AS, Mellnick VM et al (2016) Extramedullary haematopoiesis: radiological imaging features. Clin Radiol 71:807–814
Sohawon D, Lau KK, Lau T, Bowden DK (2012) Extra-medullary haematopoiesis: a pictorial review of its typical and atypical locations. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 56:538–544
Funding
Mark C. Liszewski is the recipient of grant funding for an unrelated study from Carestream Health, Inc., is an unpaid member of the Carestream Health Medical Advisory Board and is the recipient of meal and travel support from Carestream Health.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
Mark C. Liszewski is the recipient of grant funding for an unrelated study from Carestream Health, Inc., is an unpaid member of the Carestream Health Medical Advisory Board and is the recipient of meal and travel support from Carestream Health. The other authors have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vo, N.H., Shashi, K.K., Winant, A.J. et al. Imaging evaluation of the pediatric mediastinum: new International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group classification system for children. Pediatr Radiol 52, 1948–1962 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-022-05361-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-022-05361-3