Abstract
Transient patellar dislocation is a common entity in children and adolescents, characterized by lateral dislocation of the patella, usually with spontaneous reduction. Many predisposing conditions have been described, including trochlear dysplasia, excessive lateral patellar tilt, patella alta and lateralization of the tibial tuberosity. Associated injuries are bone bruises of the patella and lateral femoral condyle, tears of the medial retinaculum that include the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL), tears of the vastus medialis obliquus muscle, injuries of articular cartilage, and intra-articular bodies. Children who are refractory to conservative management, have a large cartilage defect, or are at substantial risk for recurrent dislocations are candidates for surgical procedures to prevent future dislocations. Procedures can include MPFL repair or reconstruction, tibial tubercle repositioning and lateral retinacular release. The purpose of this review is to illustrate the imaging findings of transient patellar dislocation in the acute setting, the normal imaging appearance after surgical intervention, and post-surgical complications.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Transient patellar dislocation occurs when the patella dislocates, usually laterally, with respect to the trochlea. Typically the patella reduces spontaneously when the knee is extended following the injury [1]. The majority of transient patellar dislocation occurs secondary to trauma, either from a direct blow to the knee or secondary to an indirect injury [1, 2]. The most common indirect, noncontact injury that causes transient patellar dislocation is external rotation of the leg with the foot planted. This results in valgus overload on the extensor mechanism [1]. This injury is common during sports participation, and approximately 60% of first-time dislocations occur during sports-related activities [3, 4]. There is a small subset of patients with habitual patellar dislocation who dislocate during normal activity [1]. Various classification schemes categorize patients based upon the degree of injury that precipitates a patellar dislocation [1]. Patients with patellar dislocation caused by less forceful injury often have a greater number of predisposing factors and usually need more extensive surgical correction [1].
The overall incidence of first-time transient patellar dislocation in all ages is 5.8 per 100,000; however this increases to 29 per 100,000 in 10- to 17-year-olds, the group with the highest incidence [2]. After a single episode of transient patellar dislocation is managed conservatively, up to 50% of patients experience continued anterior knee pain [2]. In patients treated with nonoperative conservative management, the rate of recurrent transient patellar dislocation ranges from 15% to 44% [2]. After the second dislocation, there is a 50% chance of future dislocations [2]. Additionally, age at presentation, initial management, and anatomical factors predict the likelihood of future dislocations [5]. Recurrent dislocations increase the risk for persistent symptoms and degenerative changes of the patellofemoral joint [3–5].
Transient patellar dislocation is a relatively common cause of anterior knee pain in children and adolescents and is associated with long-term pain and sport-limiting extensor mechanism impairment in pediatric athletes [1]. Therefore, it is important for radiologists who image children and adolescents to be familiar with the imaging findings associated with transient patellar dislocation, the common surgical procedures used to treat this entity, and the potential postoperative complications.
Factors that predispose to patellar instability
Numerous anatomical factors predispose a child to patellar instability (Table 1). Osseous and soft-tissue structures both act as stabilizers of the patella and alterations in any of these can predispose a child to patellar dislocation. Some of these features can be acquired; however most causes are congenital or developmental [6].
Osseous stabilization
Embedded within the quadriceps tendon, the patella is the largest sesamoid bone in the human body [6]. The posterior articular surface is divided into medial and lateral facets by a vertical osseous ridge [6]. Eighty percent of people have an additional narrow facet on the far medial side of the patella, called the odd facet, which is sometimes covered with articular cartilage [6]. The Wiberg classification (Fig. 1), initially a radiographic classification system that has subsequently been adapted to other modalities, is used to describe the relative medial and lateral patellar facet sizes, categorizing the patella into three types [6]. Wiberg type II is the most frequent type, accounting for up to 65% of patellae, followed by type III (approximately 25%), and type I (approximately 10%) [7]. However, no classification system of patellar shape is universally accepted and there is some disagreement as to whether a Wiberg type III patella (prominent lateral facet with a small convex medial facet) predisposes to instability. Other dysplastic patellar variations are associated with instability, as are abnormalities of patellar position [6].
A high-riding patella, termed patella alta, also is associated with patellar instability. The Insall–Salvati ratio is the most commonly accepted radiographic method used to assess the vertical position of the patella. On a lateral radiograph, the length of the patellar tendon is compared to the length of the patella, with a diagnosis of patella alta if the ratio is greater than 1.2 [8]. MRI criteria for patella alta have also been described. The shortest length of the deepest portion of the patellar tendon is measured and compared to the length of a line drawn between the anteroinferior and posterosuperior edges of the patella on a single mid-sagittal image. Patella alta is considered if the ratio is greater than 1.32 in men and 1.52 in women (Fig. 2) [9]. However, these criteria are the result of studies in adults [9]. The discrepancy between the upper limits of normal on radiographic versus MR imaging evaluation of the Install–Salvati ratio might reflect the difference in measurement technique of patellar length, which on a lateral radiograph is the summation of the entire width of the patella, whereas on MR imaging it is drawn on a single mid sagittal slice. If the patella has any obliquity in the long axis, then a single mid sagittal MR image will not show the superior-most or inferior-most borders. This might account for the relatively shorter measurement of patellar length on MR imaging and therefore higher tendon length to patellar length ratio [9]. The differences in the measurement of the patellar tendon, which is directly measured on MR imaging versus indirectly measured on radiographs, may also account for some of the difference [9].
Some authors conclude that patella alta in children exists when the Install–Salvati ratio as measured on MR imaging is greater than 1.3 [10]. Seeley et al. [10] found that after lateral patellar dislocations, children with patellar-side medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) injuries had statistically significant higher Install–Salvati ratios than children with femoral or midsubstance MPFL injuries.
Lateral patellar subluxation and lateral patellar tilt, factors that can be determined by axial imaging, also are associated with patellar instability. A variety of techniques are used to obtain axial radiographs of the patella, and various methods are described to assess subluxation and tilt. The assessment of the patellofemoral joint on axial radiographs should be based on an image obtained in 20°–45° of knee flexion, such as the Merchant view, (obtained with the child in a supine position with 45° of knee flexion), and not the sunrise view, which is obtained with greater than 90° of knee flexion with the child in the prone position [6]. The lateral patellofemoral angle is formed by a line drawn along the anterior aspects of the medial and lateral surfaces of the trochlea and another line drawn along the lateral facet of the patella [6]. In the normal knee, the angle formed by these two lines opens laterally (Fig. 3). If the lines are parallel or if the angle opens medially (Fig. 3), there is patellar tilt [6]. Axial MR or CT images can accurately show the position of the patella relative to the trochlea (Fig. 2). Some authors consider any deviation from patellar centering within the trochlea as abnormal [6, 11]. However, factors such as full knee extension, various degrees of quadriceps contraction, and a joint effusion can affect patellar position and tilt [6, 11].
The posterior surface of the patella articulates with the trochlea of the distal femur. The latter is formed by the anterior-most articular surfaces of the femur anterior to the femoral condyles. Centrally, the trochlear groove (the central depression at the intersection of the anterior medial and lateral femoral condyles) provides a corresponding surface for the vertical (or median) ridge of the patella [6]. The degree of contact between the articular surfaces of the patella and trochlea increases with knee flexion. Trochlear groove depth and inclination of the lateral trochlea both are important factors for stabilization of the patella [6]. Several radiographic measurements have been proposed to evaluate trochlear morphology, the most established of which is the measurement of lateral trochlear inclination. The utility of these radiographic angles has been questioned because they do not evaluate the cephalad portion of the trochlea, which is considered important for patellar stabilization.
MR imaging can assess this portion of the trochlea and thus measurements of trochlear depth and lateral trochlear inclination have been developed. When there is a geometric abnormality of the shape and depth of the trochlear groove, particularly at the cephalad portion, the term trochlear dysplasia is used [12]. Pfirrmann et al. [12] described the following for the measurement of trochlear depth on MR imaging: (1) The anterior–posterior lengths of the femoral condyles are added together and divided by two; (2) The anterior–posterior distance between the deepest point of the trochlear groove and a line paralleling the posterior outlines of the femoral condyles is measured and is subtracted from the value obtained in (1) (Fig. 4). In their study, a trochlear depth of 3 mm or less on an axial MR image obtained at 3 cm above the joint line was shown to have 100% sensitivity and 96% specificity for the diagnosis of trochlear dysplasia (Fig. 4) [6, 12]. However the use of a standard 3-cm distance above the joint line might not be an appropriate distance in younger children. Lateral trochlear inclination also can be assessed on MR imaging by the angle formed between a line drawn along the subchondral bone of the lateral trochlea on the most cephalad axial slice that shows trochlear articular cartilage, and a line drawn along the subchondral bone of the posterior surfaces of the femoral condyles (Fig. 5). Using this MR imaging measure of lateral trochlear inclination, one study showed that an angle <11° was 93% sensitive and 87% specific as an indicator of patellar instability [13].
Another parameter that affects patellar stability is the position of the tibial tubercle, which is the site of patellar tendon insertion. Lateralization of the tibial tubercle may require surgical correction [14]. The tibial tubercle–trochlear groove (TT–TG) distance is a parameter that many orthopedic surgeons use in the management and pre-surgical planning for patients with patellar instability. This distance can be measured on both axial CT and MR images; however it has been more extensively studied on CT [14]. The TT–TG distance can be measured on axial CT images in the following manner: A cursor is placed on the most anterior portion of tibial tubercle (this is the tibial tubercle position). Then, without moving the cursor, one scrolls cephalad to the axial image with the deepest osseous trochlear groove. The position of the tibial tubercle is translated to this more cephalad image and is marked. On this same image with the deepest trochlear groove, a posterior condylar line is drawn tangential to the posterior aspect of the femoral condyles. Next, perpendicular lines are drawn from both the deepest portion of the osseous trochlear groove and from the position of the tibial tubercle to the posterior condylar line. The perpendicular distance between these two parallel lines establishes the TT–TG distance (Fig. 6).
Various studies have reported normal ranges of the TT–TG distance, from 9.4 ± 0.6 mm to 13.6 ± 8.8 mm. Patients with patellar instability have greater values [14]. A general guideline for the TT–TG distance can be considered as: normal <15 mm, borderline 15–20 mm and abnormal >20 mm [15]. However there are differences in the values that orthopedic surgeons use; some use a TT–TG distance of greater than 15 mm and others use a more conservative value of 20 mm as a criterion for performing medialization procedures [16, 17]. Similar to patellar position, most of the studies that evaluate the TT–TG distance have been performed in adults, and this distance has been shown to increase with age. Therefore, some authors have begun to develop age-based normal values of the TT–TG distance for children in order to accurately assess what is normal or abnormal [14].
Initial studies suggested that measurements of the TT–TG distance are comparable between CT and MRI [18]. However subsequent studies have shown differences between CT and MR imaging measurements that range 2.8–3.8 mm. These seemingly minor disparities may be important given the small differences between what is considered a normal versus abnormal lateral offset [19, 20]. Discrepant measurements may relate to the differences in patient position when scanned with CT versus MR imaging with a dedicated coil [19]. Another confounding factor that might affect TT–TG values between the different imaging modalities is the landmarks used to measure this distance. Those used in CT are standardized, while those used in MR imaging are not [21]. On MR imaging the TT–TG distance can be measured with similar osseous landmarks to those described for CT, but better visualization of soft-tissue structures with MR imaging has led some authors to evaluate lateral offset with the more functional patellar tendon–trochlear groove (PT–TG) distance. The PT–TG distance is obtained on axial MR images in a similar manner to that described for CT, except that the center of the patellar tendon on the most superior axial slice, where the patellar tendon attaches to the tibia, is used as the distal landmark (PT), rather than the anterior-most portion of the osseous tibial tubercle (TT). Additionally, the deepest portion of the cartilaginous rather than the osseous trochlea is used as the TG location (Fig. 6) [21]. Wilcox et al. [21] compared the osseous TT–TG and soft-tissue functional PT–TG distances on MR images and found that the these distances are not equivalent, and in some cases differed by more than 4 mm. The authors concluded that both measurements are useful for the measurement of lateral offset of the extensor mechanism but that greater inter- and intra-observer reliabilities for the PT–TG distance may provide a more consistent measurement for surgical planning [21].
Given the differences between the TT–TG distance as measured on CT versus MR imaging, and the variability between the TT–TG and PT–TG distances, one should be cautious when applying the normal values for TT–TG distance from one study to another. Also, because the TT–TG distance increases with age, determination of age-based normal values of the TT–TG distances on MR imaging is suggested [14]. A newer approach is described by Hingelbaum et al. [22], who have proposed using MR imaging to measure a TT–TG index. This index divides the TT–TG distance by a measurement of the size of the joint from the trochlear groove to the tibial tubercle, thus giving a measurement that takes into account the overall proportionate size of the knee [22]. Further study is needed to determine the usefulness of this alternative approach.
Soft-tissue stabilization
Condensations or thickenings of the fibers of the medial retinaculum form retinacular ligaments, the most important of which is the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) (Figs. 7 and 8). The MPFL is considered the strongest passive medial stabilizer of the patella and contributes up to 60% of the medial restraining force [6]. The MPFL courses obliquely from its attachment on the medial distal femur anterior to the adductor tubercle (the insertion site of the adductor magnus muscle) at or near the superior aspect of the medial epicondyle (the insertion site of the medial collateral ligament), to attach onto the superior two-thirds of the medial aspect of the patella, with smaller attachments to the aponeurosis of the vastus medialis obliquus muscle (VMO) and inferior aspect of the patella (Figs. 7 and 8) [6, 7]. An anatomical–cadaveric correlation study by Dirim et al. [23] showed that at its patellar attachment site, superficial fibers of the MPFL are partly covered and intermingle with tendinous fibers of the VMO. This close proximity of the MPFL with the more superficial fibers of the tendon of the VMO account for the bilaminar appearance that is often seen on MR images [23]. When the even more superficial crural fascia is also seen, there is a trilaminar appearance on MR imaging (Fig. 8) [23].
Active stabilization of the patella is performed by the quadriceps muscles and tendons, which merge just above the patella [6]. For medial stabilization, the most important of these is the vastus medialis muscle, particularly the VMO fibers [6]. These arise from the distal medial inter-muscular septum and adductor tubercle of the distal femur and insert on the proximal and medial aspect of the patella, balancing the normally dominant lateral forces (Figs. 7 and 8) [6].
Imaging findings in acute transient patellar dislocation
Osseous findings
Conventional radiography is typically the initial imaging modality in children with transient patellar dislocation. In addition to anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographs, an axial radiograph of the patella should be obtained in children with known or suspected transient patellar dislocation. Radiographs in these children often show nonspecific joint effusions and soft-tissue swelling. A dislocated patella can be seen (Fig. 9); however this is a rare finding because the patella typically reduces spontaneously when the knee is extended prior to radiographic evaluation. More commonly radiographs show small osseous fragments off the medial pole of the patella as a result of osteochondral fracture or MPFL avulsion (Fig. 9). Radiographs can also depict predisposing factors for transient patellar dislocation (Fig. 3).
Osseous injuries to the patella can occur during the dislocation or relocation movements. As the patella dislocates fractures can result from the tensile forces of the medial stabilizers or from shear forces as it dislocates across the lateral trochlea; as the patella relocates fractures can result from compressive forces as it strikes the lateral femoral condyle [6]. These fractures are best identified on axial radiographs (Fig. 9) or on multiplanar CT and MR imaging. Less commonly fractures of the lateral femoral condyle occur [6]. The typical bone contusion pattern that involves the medial pole of the patella and lateral femoral condyle — as the patella strikes the lateral femoral condyle during relocation — is readily seen on MR images as hyperintense signal on fluid-sensitive sequences and as hypointense signal on T1-weighted images within the bone marrow (Fig. 10) [6]. Additionally, impaction fractures with cortical disruption at the extra-articular but intra-capsular aspect of the lateral femoral condyle can result in a large hemarthrosis or lipohemarthrosis (Fig. 11).
Articular cartilage injuries and intra-articular bodies
Articular cartilage injuries are common after patellar dislocation. A review of MR imaging findings in children after first-time patellar dislocation showed that osteochondral injuries occurred at the patella in 76%, the lateral femoral condyle in 24%, and in both locations in 6.5% [24]. As with osseous injuries, articular cartilage injuries can occur from tensile and shear forces on the patella during the dislocation or from shear and compressive forces between the patella and lateral femoral condyle during the relocation [6]. The most common site of articular cartilage injury after patellar dislocation is the medial facet of the patella (Fig. 10) [25]. Other sites of articular cartilage injury include the median ridge and lateral facet of the patella, and the anterior third of the lateral femoral condyle and lateral trochlea (Figs. 10, 12, and 13) [6, 25]. MR imaging is well suited to depict articular cartilage injury. It can detect low-grade injuries, which demonstrate abnormal signal intensity within cartilage, as well as higher-grade injuries such as partial and full-thickness fissures or fractures, chondral flaps and delamination injuries (Figs. 10, 12, and 13).
Various methods are used to grade articular cartilage injuries. The Outerbridge classification is a commonly used intraoperative 0–4 grading system, as follows: 0 = normal cartilage, 1 = cartilage softening, 2 = partial thickness lesion that does not reach subchondral bone and is <1.5 cm in diameter, 3 = lesion that extends to subchondral bone and is >1.5 cm diameter and 4 = full-thickness lesion that exposes subchondral bone [26]. Because accurate assessment of the depth of a cartilage lesion determines treatment, other more detailed systems have been developed, such as the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grading system. Modified forms of the Outerbridge and ICRS grading systems have been adapted to MR imaging (Table 2) [26]. The grading system used may vary between institutions but at a minimum the size of an articular cartilage injury should be described in two dimensions and the depth of the articular cartilage injury (less than 50%, partial but greater than 50%, full thickness with or without underlying osseous changes) should be reported [26]. A second-look arthroscopy study in children with cartilage injuries that resulted from patellar dislocation showed that lower-grade articular cartilage injuries tend to progress to higher-grade injuries with recurrent dislocation episodes, while low-grade injuries without recurrent dislocations often remain unchanged [25]. However, this same study also showed that more complicated intersecting cracks in the articular cartilage can progress to higher-grade lesions even without recurrent dislocations [25].
In addition to traditional spin-echo sequences, several advanced MR imaging techniques have been developed to evaluate articular cartilage [27]. T2 relaxation time mapping allows for the generation of a color map (Fig. 12) that depicts variations in the water content within the articular cartilage. This might allow detection of early or subtle cartilage injury when no surface contour deformity is present [27]. Delayed gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC), T1 rho, and sodium imaging are other advanced techniques that allow for evaluation of microscopic changes of articular cartilage and earlier detection of injury [27]. However clinical practice is currently focused on substantial cartilage injury with a displaced fragment that needs to be removed, with possible debridement, microfracture or refixation.
When articular cartilage injuries are detected, an extensive search for intra-articular bodies that necessitate surgical management should be performed. These bodies can migrate within the joint and often are located remotely from the site of cartilage injury. They are commonly displaced into the supra-patellar, posterior or lateral joint recesses; however they sometimes migrate into the popliteal recess or into recesses beneath the menisci and are thus more difficult to detect (Fig. 13). Also, if a blood clot fills a cartilage defect, then the site of a full-thickness cartilage injury can be difficult to detect.
Soft-tissue injuries
Medial patellofemoral ligament tears can occur at the patellar or femoral attachments, mid-substance or in multiple locations (Figs. 14, 15, and 16) [6]. In a recent MR imaging study of children after acute patellar dislocation, 78% had MPFL tears, 31% of which were at the patellar insertion site, 14% at the femoral insertion site, and 33% at both femoral and patellar attachments [10]. In this study, mid-substance attenuation was graded separately and was seen in 55% of children [10]. In the setting of an acute MPFL tear, fluid-sensitive MR images show increased signal intensity within and around the medial patellar ligamentous complex, with partial or complete disruption of fibers. Chronic MPFL tears are more difficult to detect because they lack edema-like signal, but these can show focal or diffusely attenuated or abnormally thickened fibers. The ligament fibers may be elongated, wavy or irregular [28]. Remote MPFL tears may have proliferative changes at the patellar and femoral insertion sites [28].
Description of MPFL tears detected on MR imaging should include characterization of the tear as partial or complete, the location of the tear (patellar insertion, midsubstance, femoral insertion, or multiple sites), and if there is an associated avulsion fracture fragment. Some authors have described an increased risk of recurrent patellar dislocation based upon the site of MPFL tears in men; however studies in children do not support this association [10, 29].
Because of their close relationship, disruption of the MPFL can be associated with VMO muscle tears (Figs. 14 and 16). VMO muscle tears show fluid intensity within and around muscle with disruption of the muscle fibers (Figs. 14 and 16). The most common MR imaging findings of VMO muscle injury after patellar dislocations are interstitial edema, hemorrhage and partial tearing of the muscle fibers. Additionally, the degree of uplifting of the VMO from the femur in the region of the adductor tubercle has been shown to be a predictor of the severity of MPFL injury but not a direct predictor of recurrent dislocations [10].
Management of transient patellar dislocation
Non-surgical
The decision to treat an acute patellar dislocation conservatively versus with surgical repair is controversial [5, 30, 31]. A Cochrane collaboration review published in 2015 found that although some evidence supports surgical over non-surgical treatment of primary patellar dislocation, the quality of evidence is very low and “well-designed studies recording adverse events and long-term outcomes are needed” [32]. Not surprisingly, treatment algorithms for management of an initial patellar dislocation are not uniform [33]. Some clinicians consider conservative management to be the appropriate treatment after a first episode of transient patellar dislocation if there is no osteochondral fracture fragment, if the patella is stable on clinical examination, and if there is at most partial injury of the medial stabilizers of the patella [33]. Large intra-articular osteochondral fragments (>15 mm) are typically considered a contraindication to conservative management [30]. If conservative management after a first-time transient patellar dislocation is considered clinically appropriate, these children often are placed in a patellar-stabilizing orthotic after the initial swelling goes down. Early mobilization has been shown to decrease pain and to be beneficial for the muscular, ligamentous, cartilaginous and osseous structures surrounding the knee [1, 5]. A physical-therapist-directed muscle-strengthening rehabilitation program is then initiated with the goal of strengthening the medial stabilizers of the patella [5, 30, 31].
Surgical
Given the high rate of recurrent patellar dislocations, many patients, especially those with intra-articular bodies or major tears of the medial stabilizers, are initially treated with surgery [33]. Additionally, patients treated conservatively after a primary patellar dislocation often go on to surgical management if they sustain recurrent dislocations. The number of surgical techniques used to treat patellar instability continues to increase, and there are many variations among surgeons and institutions [1]. The most commonly performed surgeries include lateral retinacular release, MPFL repair or reconstruction, and patellar repositioning procedures. These procedures can be performed alone or in combination, with the goal of restoration or improvement in medial patellar stabilization and of correct patellar alignment [1].
Lateral retinacular release is typically performed as an adjunct to MPFL reconstruction or patellar realignment procedures in an effort to reduce lateral tension on the patella [34]. However some studies support a role for isolated lateral retinacular release in adolescents with recurrent patellar dislocations [35]. The procedure is performed arthroscopically, with a full-thickness incision made through the lateral joint capsule and lateral retinaculum [36]. Postoperative MR images often show laxity and thickening of the lateral retinaculum (Fig. 17).
Because the MPFL is the most important medial stabilizer of the patella, repair and reconstruction techniques of this structure have become the mainstay of surgical procedures used to address patellar instability [1, 34]. Repairs of the MPFL can be performed at the site of patellar or femoral disruption by suturing the torn fibers to the periosteum or by attaching the fibers with bone anchors to the patella or femur [1]. Interstitial tears can also be repaired with sutures [1]. MR images after a primary MPFL repair often show susceptibility artifact from sutures or bone anchors. The repaired MPFL should show low signal intensity on T1- and T2-weighted sequences and the fibers should be intact [37].
Some orthopedic surgeons no longer perform MPFL repair and only perform reconstruction. Typical indications for reconstruction include recurrent instability, native soft-tissue laxity, deficient bony stabilizers and more severe tears of the MPFL [1]. MPFL reconstruction techniques fix a single or double graft to the medial distal femur and the medial patella. The current trends in MPFL reconstruction attempt to restore isometry, and therefore patellar and femoral fixation sites are placed near the anatomical insertion sites of the native MPFL [1, 34]. The femoral insertion site remains just distal to the physis or physeal scar throughout growth [38]. There is an ever-increasing variety of techniques for each component of the reconstruction. An autograft might be harvested from the hamstring tendons, adductor tendons, quadriceps tendon, or the iliotibial band, or alternatively an allograft might be used. Some authors propose that allografts are particularly useful in patients with underlying connective-tissue disorders such as Ehlers–Danlos syndrome because of the inherent laxity of autografts in these patients; however this point is debated [39, 40].
Patellar fixation can be accomplished with a patellar tunnel (Figs. 18, 19, and 20), bone anchors (Fig. 21), or, if a portion of the child’s native quadriceps tendon is used as the graft, the distal tendon can be left attached to the patella with the more proximal portion brought inferiorly and attached to the medial retinaculum and the femoral insertion of the MPFL (Fig. 22) [41]. Femoral fixation also can be performed with various methods including tunnel formation and use of an interference screw (metallic [Fig. 19] or bioabsorbable [Fig. 21]), post and washer fixation, direct suturing or bone anchor placement. At our institutions, surgeons most often utilize a hamstring autograft that is looped through a tunnel in the patella and fixated with an interference screw in the femur, with the goal of restoring isometry (Figs. 18, 19, and 20).
Postoperative radiographs demonstrate the positions of the femoral and patellar fixation hardware or tunnels, although they are not always readily visualized (Figs. 19 and 21). A generally accepted location used by orthopedic surgeons to determine site of placement for the femoral tunnel in skeletally mature patients is referred to as Schöttle’s point. This is a radiographic landmark meant to represent the mean center point of the MPFL attachment on a lateral intraoperative image of the knee. This point is found by drawing a line along the posterior cortex of the femur extending inferiorly. Two additional lines are drawn, both perpendicular to the first line, one of which intersects the point where the posterior medial femoral condyle intersects with the cortex of the posterior femoral diaphysis (the more superior line) and the second of which intersects the posterior-most aspect of the Blumensaat line (the more inferior line) [42, 43]. Between these lines is Schöttle’s point (Fig. 23) [42]. In a cadaveric study of skeletally immature patients Farrow et al. [44] showed that on average the MPFL attachment is 8.5 mm distal to the medial portion of the femoral physis. These authors concluded that because typical femoral tunnels for MPFL reconstruction are 5–7 mm in diameter, a tunnel drilled directly lateral could result in damage to the more inferior central portion of the distal femoral physis. For these reasons at our institution in skeletally immature patients the tunnel is placed slightly inferior and anterior to Schottle’s point, avoiding the growth plate (Fig. 23). Close attention should be given to the location of the femoral fixation on the lateral view because an anteriorly positioned site will lead to graft laxity [37].
MR images of MPFL reconstructions should show low signal intensity on T1- and T2-weighted sequences throughout the course of the graft (Fig. 20) [37]. The graft should be continuous, taut and oriented along the expected anatomical course of the native MPFL, with patellar and femoral anchor sites near the expected locations of the normal native MPFL insertions [37].
Tibial tubercle transfer or distal realignment involves the repositioning of the tibial tubercle to a more medial or more distal position [37]. This intervention is thought to address two of the anatomical factors that predispose to transient patellar dislocation, namely patella alta and excessive TT–TG distance. An osteotomy is made deep to the tibial tubercle, which is then repositioned and fixed, often with screws (Fig. 21).
Postoperative complications
The complication rate after MPFL reconstruction has been reported at approximately 26% [45] and includes pain, wound complications, persistent patellar instability, decreased knee flexion, sciatic nerve paresis and septic arthritis [32, 45]. Postoperative imaging can help to identify specific complications [37]. Wound complications are usually minor and typically diagnosed on physical examination, whereas MR imaging might show hematoma, cellulitis, abscess formation, joint effusion and synovitis associated with septic arthritis [37].
Postoperative radiographs and MR images can assess the position of the femoral and patellar fixation hardware. In addition to non-anatomical femoral fixation and potential resultant graft laxity, there is risk for persistent patellar instability [37]. Patellar tunnels can result in patellar fracture (Fig. 24) or quadriceps avulsion fractures (Fig. 25) [37, 45]. Bone anchors or interference screws that have backed out can cause loss of soft-tissue or bone purchase [37].
Recurrent patellar dislocation in children is not uncommon after surgical repair [30]. There is substantial variability in the reported rates of recurrent patellar dislocation after surgical management, some as high as 67% [30]. However, several studies combine data from patients who underwent lateral retinacular release with those who were treated with MPFL repair [30]. Nelitz et al. [46] showed no redislocations at 2 years in their prospective study of 21 skeletally immature children who underwent an anatomical MPFL reconstruction technique. Recurrent dislocation of the patella after MPFL reconstruction can lead to graft failure [37, 45]. On MR imaging, graft tear results in increased signal intensity on fluid-sensitive sequences within and around the graft, with partial or complete disruption of the graft fibers (Fig. 26). As with native MPFL tears, graft tears can occur at the patellar or femoral insertions, mid substance or at multiple sites.
Conclusion
Transient patellar dislocation is a common cause of anterior knee pain in children and adolescents and has a high recurrence rate. In many pediatric athletes, transient patellar dislocation is associated with long-term pain and sport-limiting extensor mechanism impairment. Therefore it is important for radiologists to be aware of the factors that predispose for transient patellar dislocation, the imaging appearance of acute injuries, and the chronic findings following prior patellar dislocation. Furthermore, as more children and adolescents undergo surgical management for recurrent patellar instability, radiologists who help to care for these children must be familiar with the types of procedures performed, the normal postoperative imaging appearances and the potential complications.
References
Scott WN (2012) Insall & Scott surgery of the knee, 5th edn. Churchill Livingstone, London, pp 881–894
Colvin AC, West RV (2008) Patellar instability. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:2751–2762
Kapur S, Wissman RD, Robertson M et al (2009) Acute knee dislocation: review of an elusive entity. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 38:237–250
Fithian DC, Paxton EW, Stone ML et al (2004) Epidemiology and natural history of acute patellar dislocation. Am J Sports Med 32:1114–1121
Buchner M, Baudendistel B, Sabo D et al (2005) Acute traumatic primary patellar dislocation. Clin J Sport Med 15:62–66
Kang H, Pretterklieber M (2006) Chapter 25: knee. In: Resnick D, Kang H, Pretterklieber M (eds) Internal derangements of joints, 2nd edn. Elsevier Health Sciences, Philadelphia, pp 1562–2011
Stoller DW, Sampson TG, Li AE (2007) The knee. In: Stoller DW (ed) Magnetic resonance imaging in orthopaedics and sports medicine, 3rd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 305–732
Insall J, Salvati E (1971) Patella position in the normal knee joint. Radiology 101:101–104
Shabshin N, Schweitzer ME, Morrison WB et al (2004) MRI criteria for patella alta and baja. Skelet Radiol 33:445–450
Seeley M, Bowman KF, Walsh C et al (2012) Magnetic resonance imaging of acute patellar dislocation in children. J Pediatr Orthop 32:145–155
Grelsamer RP, Newton PM, Staron RB (1998) The medial-lateral position of the patella on routine magnetic resonance imaging: when is normal not normal? Arthroscopy 14:23–28
Pfirrmann CW, Zanetti M, Romero J et al (2000) Femoral trochlear dysplasia: MR findings. Radiology 216:858–864
Carrillon Y, Abidi H, Dejour D et al (2000) Patellar instability: assessment on MR images by measuring the lateral trochlear inclination—initial experience. Radiology 216:582–585
Dickens AJ, Morrell NT, Doering A et al (2014) Tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance: defining normal in a pediatric population. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:318–324
Zbojniewicz AM (2012) Patellar dislocation. In: Donnelly LF (ed) Diagnostic imaging: pediatrics, 2nd edn. Amirsys, Altona, pp 618–621
Koëter S, Diks MJF, Anderson PG et al (2007) A modified tibial tubercle osteotomy for patellar maltracking: results at two years. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 89:180–185
Rhee SJ, Pavlou G, Oakley J et al (2012) Modern management of patellar instability. Int Orthop 36:2447–2456
Schoettle PB, Zanetti M, Seifert B et al (2006) The tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance: a comparative study between CT and MRI scanning. Knee 13:26–31
Ho CP, James EW, Surowiec RK et al (2015) Systematic technique-dependent differences in CT versus MRI measurement of the tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance. Am J Sports Med 43:675–682
Camp CL, Stuart MJ, Krych AJ et al (2013) CT and MRI measurements of tibial tubercle–trochlear groove distances are not equivalent in patients with patellar instability. Am J Sports Med 41:1835–1840
Wilcox JJ, Snow BJ, Aoki SK et al (2012) Does landmark selection affect the reliability of tibial tubercle-trochlear groove measurements using MRI? Sports. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:2253–2260
Hingelbaum S, Best R, Huth J et al (2014) The TT-TG index: a new knee size adjusted measure method to determine the TT-TG distance. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:2388–2395
Dirim B, Haghighi P, Trudell D et al (2008) Medial patellofemoral ligament: cadaveric investigation of anatomy with MRI, MR arthrography, and histologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:490–498
Seeley MA, Knesek M, Vanderhave KL (2013) Osteochondral injury after acute patellar dislocation in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop 33:511–518
Nomura E, Inoue M, Kurimura M (2003) Chondral and osteochondral injuries associated with acute patellar dislocation. Arthroscopy 19:717–721
Forney M, Subhas N, Donley B et al (2011) MR imaging of the articular cartilage of the knee and ankle. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 19:379–405
Huang M, Schweitzer ME (2014) The role of radiology in the evolution of the understanding of articular disease. Radiology 273:S1–S22
Hash TW (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee. Sports Health 5:78–107
Sillanpää PJ, Peltola E, Mattila VM et al (2009) Femoral avulsion of the medial patellofemoral ligament after primary traumatic patellar dislocation predicts subsequent instability in men: a mean 7-year nonoperative follow-up study. Am J Sports Med 37:1513–1521
Palmu S, Kallio PE, Donell ST et al (2008) Acute patellar dislocation in children and adolescents: a randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:463–470
Sillanpää PJ, Mattila VM, Mäenpää H et al (2009) Treatment with and without initial stabilizing surgery for primary traumatic patellar dislocation. A prospective randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:263–273
Smith TO, Donell S, Song F et al (2015) Surgical versus non-surgical interventions for treating patellar dislocation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2, CD008106. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008106.pub3
Sillanpää PJ, Mäenpää HM (2012) First-time patellar dislocation. Sports Med Arthrosc 20:128–135
Panagopoulos A, van Niekerk L, Triantafillopoulos IK (2008) MPFL reconstruction for recurrent patella dislocation: a new surgical technique and review of the literature. Int J Sports Med 29:359–365
Roth S, Madarevic T, Vukelic L et al (2013) Influence of arthroscopic lateral release on functional recovery in adolescents with recurrent patellar dislocation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133:1441–1445
Panni AS, Tartarone M, Patricola A et al (2005) Long-term results of lateral retinacular release. Arthroscopy 21:526–531
Torabi M, Wo S, Vyas D et al (2015) MRI evaluation and complications of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Clin Imaging 39:116–127
Ladd PE, Laor T, Emery KH et al (2010) Medial collateral ligament of the knee on magnetic resonance imaging: does the site of the femoral origin change at different patient ages in children and young adults? J Pediatr Orthop 30:224–230
Shirley ED, DeMaio M, Bodurtha J (2012) Ehlers-Danlos syndrome in orthopaedics: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment implications. Sports Health 4:394–403
Williams J, Hutt J, Rickman M (2015) Case report: anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Case Rep Orthop 2015:160381
Fink C, Veselko M, Herbort M et al (2014) MPFL reconstruction using a quadriceps tendon graft. Knee 21:1175–1179
Schöttle PB, Schmeling A, Rosenstiel N et al (2007) Radiographic landmarks for femoral tunnel placement in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 35:801–804
Jaecker V, Brozat B, Banerjee M et al (2015) Fluoroscopic control allows for precise tunnel positioning in MPFL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.1007/s00167-015-3613-9
Farrow LD, Alentado VJ, Abdulnabi Z et al (2014) The relationship of the medial patellofemoral ligament attachment to the distal femoral physis. Am J Sports Med 42:2214–2218
Shah JN, Howard JS, Flanigan DC et al (2012) A systematic review of complications and failures associated with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for recurrent patellar dislocation. Am J Sports Med 40:1916–1923
Nelitz M, Dreyhaupt J, Reichel H et al (2012) Anatomic Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament in children and adolescents with open growth plates: surgical technique and clinical outcome. Am J Sports Med 41:58–63
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
None.
Additional information
CME activity
This article has been selected as the CME activity for the current month. Please visit the SPR Web site at www.pedrad.org on the Education page and follow the instructions to complete this CME activity.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meyers, A.B., Laor, T., Sharafinski, M. et al. Imaging assessment of patellar instability and its treatment in children and adolescents. Pediatr Radiol 46, 618–636 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-015-3520-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-015-3520-8