Abstract
Background
Microvascular free flaps are ideal for reconstructing post-oncological surgery defects in the head and neck region. Free flaps provide ample tissue for reconstructing even large, complex defects, which gives oncosurgeons flexibility during tumor resections.
Methods
We performed 1000 free flap head and neck reconstructions in 978 patients from June 2015 to September 2018. For reconstructing bone defects, our flap of choice was the free fibula. The surgical outcomes and complications according to flap were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed.
Results
The overall flap success rate was 98.1%. A total of 45 cases required emergency surgical re-exploration for compromised flaps and 19 of these flaps could not be salvaged. Venous insufficiency was the most common cause of surgical re-exploration. Flaps with delayed arterial thrombosis and vascular compression could not be salvaged. Other complications were partial flap necrosis, orocutaneous fistula, and donor site complications. No statistically significant differences were noted for complications in elderly and post-radiotherapy patients.
Conclusions
Free flap reconstruction is a robust and highly reliable option for head and neck defects, and two free flaps are a safe option for treating large defects. A second free flap should be the first choice in failed cases after the medical optimization of the patient. Free flap reconstruction is safe in elderly and post-radiotherapy patients.
Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Microvascular free flap reconstruction has become the preferred method for resolving post-oncologic surgical defects in the head and neck region [1,2,3]. Free flaps provide ample tissue to reconstruct any type of large complex defect, which, in turn, provides oncosurgeons with freedom and flexibility during tumor resections. Acceptable functional and esthetic outcomes have been achieved with free flap reconstruction. Better magnification and refined instrumentation have improved results with success rates up to 98% [4].
With advancements in free flap reconstruction, it has become a safe procedure for elderly patients as well [5, 6]. Free flap reconstruction is also safe in patients who have already undergone chemo or radiotherapy [7]. The radial artery forearm flap (RAFF) and anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap are ideal for soft-tissue defect reconstruction in the head and neck region. Free radial forearm flap reconstruction was first introduced by Yang et al. [8] in 1978 and has remained an ideal choice for certain situations that require a small, thin flap. Such situations include small tongue defects (Figs. 1, 2, and 3) where tongue mobility is more important, lip reconstruction, small mucosal defects, nose reconstruction, and palatal reconstruction. Song et al. [9] first described using the ALT flap in 1984, which replaced the radial forearm flap as the most common flap due to its high reliability and the availability of ample of tissue that can be harvested with less donor site morbidity (Figs. 4, 5, 6, and 7). In cases with bony defects of the mandible and maxilla, the free fibula has become the flap of choice. Bone stalk is also good for the placement of dental implants [10]. The free fibula can also be harvested as an osteocutaneous flap with either single or double skin paddles on different perforators (Figs. 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12).
In microvascular surgery, attentive monitoring is essential to identify any flap-related complication as early as possible and successfully salvage the flap. Maintaining a high flap reconstruction success rate and a low complication rate is challenging in a high-volume reconstruction unit. It requires a dedicated team of competent reconstructive surgeons, oncosurgeons, anesthesiologists, and nurses in both the ICU and general ward.
This study evaluates the outcomes of 1000 microvascular free flap reconstructions performed to treat head and neck defects from June 2015 to September 2018 at a tertiary cancer center.
Material and methods
In this retrospective study, the records of 978 consecutive patients were reviewed in which 1000 microvascular free flap reconstructions were performed between 2015 and 2018 to resolve defects in the head and neck region. A two-team approach was adopted to reduce the total surgical time for harvesting the flap and the oncologic resection.
After microsurgery, we recorded the major and minor complications. A major complication was defined as one that required additional surgical intervention whereas a minor complication could be managed conservatively.
Results
The mean age of the patients was 49.8 years (range = 2.5–84 years). There were 185 patients above 65 years of age for which 185 free flap reconstructions were performed. There were more male (n = 861) than female (n = 117) patients. Medical records including details regarding the primary tumor site, flap type, outcome, and complications were analyzed. Buccal mucosa was the most common malignancy site followed by the tongue and the lower alveolus (Table 1). In 68 (7%) patients, reconstruction was done post-radiotherapy. In this clinical series, 978 patients were reconstructed with 1000 free flaps: 525 were anterolateral thigh flaps, 229 were fibula flaps, and 224 were radial forearm flaps (Fig. 13). The tensor fascia lata (TFL) flap, anteromedial thigh (AMT) flap, gracilis flap, and medial sural artery perforator (MSAP) flap were also used for reconstruction although less frequently. Two flaps were needed in 22 patients; double free flaps were required in 9 patients, 2 patients required free flaps for loss of the inner paddle of the fibula flap, and 11 free flaps were used as salvage flaps in free flap failures.
The most common artery used for anastomosis was the facial artery (n = 728) followed by the superior thyroid artery (n = 242). The lingual artery and end to side external carotid artery (ECA) were used for anastomosis in previously operated patients or in patients with neo-pharyngeal reconstructions where, due to salvage laryngectomy, other vessels were sacrificed (Table 2).
The most common veins used for anastomosis were the common facial vein (n = 445) and internal jugular vein (n = 277) but the superior thyroid vein and other innominate veins were also frequently employed (Table 3).
There were 76 major complications that required emergency re-exploration and 102 minor complications, which were managed conservatively (Table 4). Forty-five patients were examined for vascular compromise, and 31 were explored for bleeding only. Out of the 45 compromised flaps, 24 could be salvaged, and total flap loss was seen in 19 cases. In two patients with double paddle free fibula, inner skin paddle become completely ischemic due to compression over the perforator (Table 5).
Flap congestion was the major cause of compromised flaps in 33 cases in which venous thrombosis was the leading cause in two-thirds of the cases (Table 6). The flap salvage rate was 73% in this group.
Arterial thrombosis was observed in six cases; in two post-radiotherapy cases, where the arteries were thrombosed multiple times on the table, the pectoralis major myocutaneous (PMMC) flap became the salvage flap. In the remaining four cases, flap ischemia was noted on the fifth to the seventh postoperative day and flap salvage was not possible due to this late presentation.
The vascular pedicle was compressed in four cases; the pedicle was pedicle was coming through the floor muscles and became compressed between the mandible and floor muscles. Both artery and vein were thrombosed so near to the skin paddle that re-anastomosis was not possible.
In the two double paddle cases, the free fibula inner paddle was lost due to compression of the perforator under the bone; the free ALT flap was used for lining.
Minor complications occurred in 102 cases (Table 4). Partial flap necrosis was seen in 26 cases and managed with debridement and re-suturing. Most of the orocutaneous fistulas were managed conservatively while a few required re-suturing. Donor site complications included seroma, partial graft loss, and scar hypertrophy.
Out of the 19 cases of free flap failure, a second free flap procedure was performed in 11 patients. The PMMC flap was used in six cases when undergoing a second prolonged anesthesia was life-threatening for the patients. In two small defects, one was managed with the nasolabial flap and the other one was managed conservatively (Table 7).
The complication rates in patients over 65 years of age are given in Table 8. Complete flap loss was noted in four patients (2.16%) compared with the younger population (1.63%), which was statistically not significant (p = 0.766). The other complications were not statistically significant. We found more atherosclerotic changes in this population, especially in peroneal arteries. We found arterial thrombosis in the late postoperative period in two free fibula flaps, likely due to crushing the atheroma in the arterial wall by the double arterial clamp. Hence, going forward, we have taken two precautions: using the distal part of the artery for anastomosis with the least atherosclerotic changes and anastomosis without applying clamps over the flap arteries. In this age group, we avoided adding a second free flap for fear of a second prolonged anesthesia. The PMMC flap was the subject in two cases, the nasolabial flap in one case, and a small tongue defect was managed conservatively in one case.
In post-radiotherapy patients, 68 free flaps were performed with primary free flap failure in two patients due to arterial thrombosis. Venous congestion was found in three cases, and all flaps were salvaged in this group. The flap failure rate was non-significant compared with the non-radiated group (p = 0.375). Vessel dissection in radiated neck tissue was challenging due to fibrosis in the region and the formation of tough capsules around the vessels. It was easier to follow the vessels from the lower, virgin part of the neck. Arteries showed more changes to their walls, especially the facial artery, and, therefore, we opted to use the superior thyroid and lingual arteries for anastomosis after two initial failures. Although the veins were also covered in a tough capsule, the walls were unaffected, in fact, along with capsule dissection the adventitia was removed automatically and the problem of drawing in the adventitia during anastomosis was reduced in our experience.
Initially, radial forearm flap was the most often used soft-tissue flap for reconstruction but as familiarity with ALT increased, it became the flap of choice. Free ALT was the most reliable and versatile soft-tissue flap with the least donor site complications. We did not use Doppler or angiography to identify the perforations preoperatively. When a good-sized perforator was not found in the lateral thigh, the flap was converted to an anteromedial thigh (AMT) flap [11]. We only encountered this situation on four occasions while harvesting 529 flaps (0.75%) (Fig. 14). Most of the time, if a typical perforator was not found coming from the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery, perforators coming from the transverse or oblique branches were saviors. We often found perforators coming through the posterior third muscle mass of the vastus lateralis instead of the anterior third. The average length of intensive care unit stay was around 48 h and the total hospital stay was 5 to 7 days. On the fifth day, oral liquids were allowed and Ryle’s tube was removed between 10 and 14 days.
Discussion
At our institution, the ALT flap is a work-horse [12,13,14] flap for head and neck reconstruction though the free radial forearm flap remains an ideal choice for certain situations for which a small, thin flap is required [15]. Currently, we are replacing RAFF with supra-fascial or thinned ALT flaps or with medial sural artery perforator flap (MSAP), which negates poor donor site scarring over the forearm.
Free flaps have become the ideal choice for head and neck reconstruction. In high-volume centers, the global success rate of free flap survival is approaching 98%. At our center, the overall success rate was found to be 98.1%, which is comparable to most centers worldwide [16,17,18,19].
Our data indicated an exploration rate of 4.5% for compromised flaps and compared favorably with available data in the literature reporting surgical re-exploration rates for compromised flaps between 3 and 20% [20,21,22,23,24]. Venous insufficiency was the most common cause of re-exploration. This finding is consistent with reports published in the literature [21, 23, 25, 26]. Because the venous wall is thinner and the pressure is much lower than arterial, they are more susceptible to mechanical compression. In head and neck reconstruction where watertight suturing is mandatory, flap edema itself exerts more pressure than other regions where loose suturing is an option. There are various reasons for vascular compression including narrow subcutaneous or submandibular tunnel, wound bed hematoma, excessive pedicle length leading to vessel kinks, improper positioning of the artery over the veins, tight dressing over the neck, acute neck flexion, and the body posture of the patient.
Venous insufficiency was the main cause of re-exploration in our study, but the flap salvage rate was quite high in this group in contrast to arterial insufficiency [27]. The overall flap salvage rate was 56% in this group, which is comparable to the salvage rates (30 to 70%) reported in the literature [18, 21,22,23, 28].
Compared with other flaps, free fibula flaps had higher complication rates. In two patients with double paddle free fibula, the inner paddle was lost due to compression of the perforator under the bone. Apart from this, venous congestion, bleeding, partial flap necrosis, and orocutaneous fistula formation were more common in free fibula cases. Other authors reported a similar trend of higher complication rates between bone-containing free flaps compared with pure soft-tissue ones [29,30,31]. We used the fibula as a double paddle for lining and covering both based on different skin perforators. A few times, the proximal perforator did not come through the peroneal vessels and a separate anastomosis was performed.
Managing complex defects with double free flap reconstruction
Simultaneous multiple free tissue transfer is a challenging undertaking typically in patients with locally advanced disease and composite tissue defects. Most double free flap procedures consist of a combination of osteocutaneous and soft-tissue flaps [32,33,34]. This combination provides good functional and esthetic results in large oro-mandibular defects [35]. Free osteocutaneous fibula flaps were used for bony defect and inner lining whereas the chimeric ALT flap was used to fill the cavity of the maxillary sinus and infratemporal fossa and to provide an outer cover [36]. In two cases, the free radial forearm flap was combined with the fibula flap when lip reconstruction was required along with the bony defect. Although, theoretically, the risk of complication is higher in double free flap reconstructions, we were lucky to not have any single flap loss. Due to an abundance of tissue, fistula, infection, and post-radiation plate exposure rates were also lower [37].
Management after flap failure
The ideal choice for reconstruction in failed free flap cases is a matter of debate. Initially, we would use the PMMC as a salvage flap but we were forced to use another free flap when the defect was too large and complex to be reconstructed with the PMMC. After patient optimization and excluding preventable causes, the results were promising. To date, we have not lost any second free flaps. Currently, we use the PMMC flap when the patient is too high-risk for a second prolonged anesthesia.
Conclusions
In our experience with 1000 free flaps for head and neck reconstruction, it is a highly reliable technique with the ability to reconstruct any complex bony or soft-tissue defect. Even two free flaps are safe for large defects in experienced hands. A second free flap should be the first choice in failed cases after the medical optimization of the patient. The ALT flap is becoming the first choice for reconstruction of soft-tissue defects except for small tongue defects in obese patients where RAFF is the flap of choice. The fibula flap carries the additional risk of complications due to the complexity of fabrication and fixation. Flap failures are unavoidable but the success rate is promising with an experienced team, good instruments, and solid infrastructure.
References
Arce K, Bell RB, Potter JK, Buehler MJ, Potter BE, Dierks EJ (2012) Vascularized free tissue transfer for reconstruction of ablative defects in oral and oropharyngeal cancer patients undergoing salvage surgery following concomitant chemoradiation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41(6):733–738
Eckardt A, Fokas K (2003) Microsurgical reconstruction in the head and neck region: an 18-year experience with 500 consecutive cases. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 31(4):197–201
Pohlenz P, Klatt J, Schön G, Blessmann M, Li L, Schmelzle R (2012) Microvascular free flaps in head and neck surgery: complications and outcome of 1000 flaps. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41(6):739–743
Kesting MR, Holzle F, Wales C et al (2011) Microsurgical reconstruction of the oral cavity with free flaps from the anterolateral thigh and the radial forearm: a comparison of perioperative data from 161 cases. Ann Surg Oncol 18(7):1988–1994
Blackwell KE (1999) Unsurpassed reliability of free flaps for head and neck reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 125(3):295–299
Weaver TS, Wester JL, Gleysteen JP, Peck JJ, Wax MK (2014) Surgical outcomes in the elderly patient after osteocutaneous free flap transfer. Laryngoscope. 124(11):2484–2488
Nakamizo M, Yokoshima K, Yagi T (2004) Use of free flaps for reconstruction in head and neck surgery: a retrospective study of 182 cases. Auris Nasus Larynx 31(3):269–273
Yang G (1981) Forearm free skin flap transplantation; report of 56 cases. Natl Med J China Med J China 61:139
Song Y, Chen G, Song Y (1984) The free thigh flap: a new free flap concept based on the septocutaneous artery. Br J Plast Surg 37(2):149–159
Lopez-Arcas JM, Arias J, Del Castillo JL et al (2010) The fibula osteomyocutaneous flap for mandible reconstruction: a 15-year experience. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68(10):2377–2384
Namgoong S, Yoon YD, Yoo KH, Han SK, Kim WK, Dhong ES (2018) Alternative choices for anterolateral thigh flaps lacking suitable perforators: a systematic review. J Reconstr Microsurg 34(07):465–471
Lueg EA (2004) The anterolateral thigh flap: radial forearm’s “big brother” for extensive soft tissue head and neck defects. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130(7):813–818
Sun G, Lu M, Tang E, Yang X, Wen J, Wang Z (2011) Clinical application of free anterolateral thigh flap in the reconstruction of intraoral defects. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 112(1):34–41
Bianchi B, Ferri A, Ferrari S, Copelli C, Boni P, Ferri T, Sesenna E (2012) The free anterolateral thigh musculocutaneous flap for head and neck reconstruction: one surgeon’s experience in 92 cases. Microsurgery. 32(2):87–95
Valentini V, Cassoni A, Marianetti TM, Battisti A, Terenzi V, Iannetti G (2008) Anterolateral thigh flap for the reconstruction of head and neck defects: alternative or replacement of the radial forearm flap? J Craniofac Surg 19(4):1148–1153
Wei F-C, Demirkan F, Chen H-C, Chuang DCC, Chen SHT, Lin CH, Cheng SL, Cheng MH, Lin YT (2001) The outcome of failed free flaps in head and neck and extremity reconstruction: what is next in the reconstructive ladder? Plast Reconstr Surg 108(5):1154–1160
Liang J, Yu T, Wang X, Zhao Y, Fang F, ZengW LZ (2018) Free tissue flaps in head and neck reconstruction: clinical application and analysis of 93 patients of a single institution. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 84(4):416–425
Mao C, Yu G, Peng X, Guo C, Huang M, Zhang Y (2003) A review of 545 consecutive free flap transfers for head and neck reconstruction in a new microsurgery unit. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi 38(1):3–6
Bui DT, Cordeiro PG, Hu Q-Y, Disa JJ, Pusic A, Mehrara BJ (2007) Free flap reexploration: indications, treatment, and outcomes in 1193 free flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 119(7):2092–2100
Zafereo ME, Weber RS, Lewin JS, Roberts DB, Hanasono MM (2010) Complications and functional outcomes following complex oropharyngeal reconstruction. Head Neck 32(8):1003–1011
Bianchi B, Copelli C, Ferrari S, Ferri A, Sesenna E (2009) Free flaps: outcomes and complications in head and neck reconstructions. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 37(8):438–442
Jones NF, Johnson JT, Shestak KC, Myers EN, Swartz WM (1996) Microsurgical reconstruction of the head and neck: interdisciplinary collaboration between head and neck surgeons and plastic surgeons in 305 cases. Ann Plast Surg 36(1):37–43
Devine JC, Potter LA, Magennis P, Brown JS, Vaughan ED (2001) Flap monitoring after head and neck reconstruction: evaluating an observation protocol. J Wound Care 10(1):525–529
Simpson KH, Murphy PG, Hopkins PM, Batchelor AG (1996) Prediction of outcomes in 150 patients having microvascular free tissue transfers to the head and neck. Br J Plast Surg 49(5):267–273
Ross G, Yla-Kotola TM, Goldstein D, Zhong T, Gilbert R, Irish J, Gullane PJ, Hofer SOP, Neligan PC (2012) Second free flaps in head and neck reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 65(9):1165–1168
Wu C-C, Lin P-Y, Chew K-Y, Kuo Y-R (2014) Free tissue transfers in head and neck reconstruction: complications, outcomes and strategies for management of flap failure: analysis of 2019 flaps in single institute. Microsurgery. 34(5):339–344
Issing PR, Kempf HG, Heppt W, Schonermark M, Lenarz T (1996) Reconstructive surgery in the head-neck area with regional and free tissue transfer. Laryngorhinootologie. 75(8):476–482
Classen DA, Ward H (2006) Complications in a consecutive series of 250 free flap operations. Ann Plast Surg 56(5):557–561
O’brien CJ, Lee KK, Stern HS et al (1998) Evaluation of 250 freeflap reconstructions after resection of tumours of the head and neck. Aust N Z J Surg 68(10):698–701
Yamashiro M, Hasegawa K, Uzawa N, Michi Y, Ishii J, Yoshitake H, Kobayashi J, Yagihara K, Okabe S, Amagasa T (2009) Complications and outcome of free flap transfers for oral and maxillofacial reconstruction. Oral Sci Int 6(1):46–54
Han Z, Li J, Li H, Su M, Qin L (2013) Single versus dual venous anastomoses of the free fibula osteocutaneous flap in mandibular reconstruction: a retrospective study. Microsurgery. 33(8):652–655
Urken ML, Weinberg H, Vickery C, Aviv JE, Buchbinder D, Lawson W, Biller HF (1992) The combined sensate radial forearm and iliac crest free flaps for reconstruction of significant glossectomymandibulectomy defects. Laryngoscope. 102(5):543–558
Sanger JR, Matloub HS, Yousif NJ (1990) Sequential connection of flaps: a logical approach to customized mandibular reconstruction. Am J Surg 160(4):402–404
Balasubramanian D, Thankappan K, Kuriakose MA, Duraisamy S, Sharan R, Mathew J, Sharma M, Iyer S (2012) Reconstructive indications of simultaneous double free flaps in the head and neck: a case series and literature review. Microsurgery. 32(6):423–430
Andrades P, Bohannon IA, Baranano CF, Wax MK, Rosenthal E (2009) Indications and outcomes of double free flaps in head and neck reconstruction. Microsurg Off J Int Microsurg Soc Eur Fed Soc Microsurg 29(3):171–177
Wei F-C, Celik N, Chen H-C, Cheng M-H, Huang W-C (2002) Combined anterolateral thigh flap and vascularized fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap in reconstruction of extensive composite mandibular defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 109(1):45–52
Guillemaud JP, Seikaly H, Cote DWJ, Barber BR, Rieger JM, Wolfaardt J, Nesbitt P, Harris JR (2009) Double free-flap reconstruction: indications, challenges, and prospective functional outcomes. Arch Otolaryngol Neck Surg 135(4):406–410
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Consulted to our institutional authorities, they are saying as a Retrospective study it does not require ethical approval and this study adheres to law of our country.
Conflict of interest
Mishra Kripa Shanker, Arora Rajan, Bhoye Hemant, and Dewan Ajay Kumar declare no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This is a retrospective study and the local research ethics committee has confirmed that no ethical approval is required.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Patient consent
Patients signed informed consent regarding publishing their data and photographs.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shanker, M.K., Rajan, A., Hemant, B. et al. Outcome of 1000 free flap head and neck reconstructions at a tertiary cancer care institute in India. Eur J Plast Surg 44, 25–32 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-020-01693-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-020-01693-1