Introduction

Electrochemiluminescence (ECL) is an emit light process in which an excited state-forming substance generated on the surface of an electrode undergoes an electron transfer reaction [1, 2]. ECL has attracted wide attention due to its low background, high sensitivity, electrochemical controllability, large sensing dynamic range, and superiority in fluorescence and sensitivity (S/N) [3]. The design and screening of ECL has played a vital role in the development after the preliminary study of ECL in 1964 [2]. The ECL phenomenon of Ru(bpy)32+ and the anode co-reactant, tri-n-propylamine (TPrA) were discovered in 1972 and in 1987, respectively [4]. Then, the Ru(bpy)32+/TPrA system had been used as a commercial ECL detection system for the test of various life and medical diagnostic analytical field. Since Zou and Zhu reported in 2004 that CdSe NCs had made breakthroughs in ECL biosensors as ECL illuminants, a large number of binary NCs have been studied such as PbS [5], CdSe [6], and CdTe NCs [7]. Actually, the development of the lower toxic NCs was necessary to overcome the toxicity shortcoming of traditional II–IV NCs mentioned above [8].

In recent years, ternary metal chalcogenides (such as CuInS2 and AgInS2) have been recognized as promising light emitters with low biological toxicity [9], and have received a lot of research attention [10]. Studies showed that ternary metal chalcogenide nanocrystals had an adjustable band gap leading to adjustable optical properties [11]. It was reported that the core-shell-structured nanocrystals (such as CuInS2/ZnS and AgInS2/ZnS) showed a higher quantum yield than core CuInS2 [12] or AgInS2 [13]. This was related to the radiation recombination of ZnS with wide band gap after passivation of the core AgInS2 surface [14, 15]. Due to the high carrier migration rate [16], ternary metal chalcogenide compounds were widely used in photoelectric fields including solar cells [17] and light-emitting diodes [18]. More importantly, the surface of these nanocrystals can be easily modified with multifunctional ligands in preparation for binding to various target biomolecules [19], leading to the application in biological fields [20], such as bioimaging [21] and biosensors [22].

However, the researches about ECL immunoassay sensors fabricated by these ternary metal chalcogenide NCs to detect tumor markers are still limited. Herein, reduced glutathione and citric acid were used as stabilizers to prepare AgInS2/ZnS NCs in the aqueous phase, whose ECL properties were studied with TPrA as the anode co-reactant [23]. Its ECL intensity is not only much greater than previously reported ternary NCs [24], but also produces a lower ECL potential, which can prohibit the electrochemical interference from high potential oxidation [25]. The water-phase AgInS2/ZnS NCs exhibit excellent ECL performance, and the ECL immunodetection methods prepared with AgInS2/ZnS NCs as markers can target CA125 at lower trigger potentials (Scheme 1). It would provide more effective detection methods in the early diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer. This work proposes an efficient nontoxic ECL immunosensing strategy with low trigger potential and less electrochemical interference, which was expected to be used for highly sensitive and selective bioassays.

Scheme 1
scheme 1

Schematic illustration of the fabricating procedures of ECL sensor with AgInS2/ZnS NCs as tag

Experimental

Chemicals and materials

All chemicals and materials were of analytical grade or better, and all aqueous solutions were prepared with double-distilled water. Silver nitrate (AgNO3, 99.8%) was purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Regent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Potassium phosphate monobasic (KH2PO4) and isopropanol were purchased from Guangcheng Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China). Sodium sulfide nonahydrate (Na2S.9H2O, 99.9%), ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH), reduced glutathione (GSH) (98%), citric acid (99.5%), zinc acetate (Zn(CH3COO)2.2H2O, 98%), indium trichloride tetrahydrate (InCl3.4H2O, 99.99%), p-aminobenzene formic acid (ABA), and TPrA were obtained from Aladdin (Shanghai, China). Potassium chloride (KCl), potassium ferricyanide (K3[Fe(CN)6]), potassium hexacyanoferrate (K4[Fe(CN)6]), and dipotassium hydrogen phosphate trihydrate (K2HPO4·3H2O) were purchased from Xilong Chemical Co., Ltd. (Shantou, China). 1-Ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC, 98%) and bovine serum albumin (BSA) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemicals Co. LLC. (St. Louis, MO, USA). N-Hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) was obtained from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). EDC and NHS were dissolved in a 100 mM pH 7.4 phosphate buffer (PB) containing 0.50 M KCl before use. Carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125, Ag, 50KU/ml, Lot: 181120), capture CA125 antibody (2.7 mg/mL, Ab1, Lot: Z811N206), probe CA125 antibody (2.8 mg/mL, Ab2, Lot: Z811N204), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP, 105 μg/mL, Ag, Lot: 120715), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA 100 μg/mL, Ag, Lot: 170210), and prostate-specific (PSA(PSA, 0.1 mg/mL, Ag, Lot: 191130), antigen and antibody were purchased from Beijing Keyue Zhongkai Biotechnology Co., Ltd., (Beijing, China), which were diluted with 10 mM pH 7.4 PB before use. The human serum samples in this study were bought from Beijing Century Aoke Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China).

Apparatus

Ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) absorption and photoluminescence (PL) spectra were recorded on ultraviolet-visible Lambda365 spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer, South Korea) and F-4600 fluorescence spectrophotometer (Hitachi, Japan), respectively. PL lifetime and PL quantum yield (PLQY) of colloidal AgInS2/ZnS NCs were carried on an FLS920 fluorescence spectrometer (Edinburgh Instruments, UK). High-resolution transmission electron microscope (HRTEM) image was taken on the Titan G2 60-300 transmission electron microscope (FEI, USA). X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern was recorded on ultima IV X-ray diffractometer within an angle 2θ range from 20° to 70° (Rigaku Beijing Corp, China). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was collected on Thermo ESCALAB 250Xi X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) curves were recorded with a CHI 760E electrochemical analyzer (Shanghai, China). Cyclic voltammograms (CV) and ECL measurements were carried out on an MPI-EII ECL analyzer (Xi’an Remex Analytical Instrument Co., Ltd., China). ECL spectra were accomplished with a homemade ECL spectrometer consisting of an Acton SP2300i monochromator equipped with a VersaSTAT 3 electrochemical analyzer (Princeton Applied Research, USA) and a liquid N2 cooled PyLoN 400BR-eXcelon digital CCD detector (Princeton Instruments, USA) by using a three-electrode system, including a Pt coil counter electrode, an Ag/AgCl containing saturated KCl reference electrode, and a 5 mm diameter glassy carbon electrode (GCE).

Preparation of AgInS2/ZnS NCs

Colloidal AgInS2/ZnS NCs were synthesized in the aqueous phase by using GSH and citric acid as stabilizers [23] [21]. Typically, a 2.5 mL double-distilled water combining an aliquot of GSH (0.5 M, 2.4 mL) and InCl3.4H2O (1.0 M, 0.8 mL) containing 0.25 M HNO3 were vigorously stirred in a three-necked flask to be dissolved completely. After ~ 3 min, NH4OH (5.0 M, 1.0 mL) was added and stirred until the white precipitate was dissolved. Subsequently, AgNO3 (0.1 M, 2 mL), Na2S.9H2O (1.0 M, 1.0 mL), and citric acid (2.0 M, 0.25 mL) were rapidly injected into the mixture to react for 60 min at 98 °C and form AgInS2 NCs. Meanwhile, GSH (0.5 M, 3.0 mL) was stirred with NH4OH (5.0 M, 0.4 mL) and Zn(CH3COOO)2.2H2O (1.0 mM, 1.6 mL) containing 0.01 M HNO3 to form a clear solution, and the solution was stirred with the above-prepared AgInS2 colloid, and reacted for 10 min at 98 °C to obtain AgInS2/ZnS NCs. Finally, the AgInS2/ZnS NCs was centrifuged and washed with isopropanol at 10000 rcf for three times, and then dispersed in double-distilled water at 4 °C to obtained monodispersed AgInS2/ZnS NCs.

Preparation of AgInS2/ZnS NC-labeled CA125 antibody (i.e., CA125 Ab2|AgInS2/ZnS)

As demonstrated in Scheme 1a, the carboxylic groups of AgInS2/ZnS NCs was activated by mixing 50 μL purified AgInS2/ZnS NCs with an aliquot of 20 μL pH 6.0 PB containing 100 mg/mL EDC and 100 mg/mL NHS for 30 min at room temperature, and then centrifuged at 12000 rcf for 6 min. The precipitate was re-dispersed in 1.0 mL 10 mM pH 7.4 PB containing 10 μg/mL CA125 Ab2 to form CA125 Ab2|AgInS2/ZnS conjugates. Then, 10 μL 1% (v/v) BSA was added to block the nonspecific binding sites for 30 min after shaking for 3 h at room temperature. Finally, the CA125 Ab2|AgInS2/ZnS conjugates was centrifuged and re-dispersed in 1.0 mL 10 mM pH 7.4 PB, and stored at 4 °C for further use.

Preparation of AgInS2/ZnS NC-based ECL biosensor

According to Scheme 1b, the ECL immunosensor was fabricated with AgInS2/ZnS NCs initialed by immobilizing antibody (Ab1) onto the GCE with ABA as adapter [26]. The GCE was polished to a mirror with alumina slurry, washed cleanly with a lot of double-distilled water, and dried by nitrogen (N2). Subsequently, the cleaned GCE was electrodeposited with 1.0 mM ABA by scanning potential from 0.4 to 1.2 V in 0.1 M pH 7.4 PB containing 1.0 mM ABA at 10 mV/s for three cycles to form carboxyl group-modified GCE|ABA [25]. The carboxyl groups of GCE surface were activated with 100 mg/mL EDC and 100 mg/mL NHS at room temperature after the GCE|ABA was washed with ethanol and double-distilled water. The GCE|ABA was placed into 10 mM pH 7.4 PB containing 10 μg/mL CA125 Ab1 for 2 h to form GCE|ABA-CA125 Ab1. The electrode was washed with 10 mM pH 7.4 PB, and then 1% (v/v) BSA solution was added dropwise for 30 min to block any remaining activated carboxyl groups. The GCE|ABA-CA125 Ab1 was then incubated with an aliquot of 20 μL CA125 antigen with different concentrations for 90 min at 37 °C to obtain GCE|ABA-CA125 Ab1 < CA125 antigen. The GCE|ABA-CA125 Ab1 < CA125 antigen was further incubated with CA125 Ab2|AgInS2/ZnS for 1 h to form a sandwich-type immunosensor, i.e., GCE|ABA-CA125 Ab1<CA125 antigen>CA125 Ab2|AgInS2/ZnS.

ECL detection of CA125

The ECL immunosensor measurements were detected in 0.1 M pH 7.4 PB containing 10 mM TPrA by scanning potential from 0 to 1.6 V for one cycle at 50 mV/s. Serum samples were diluted with 10 mM pH 7.4 PB to determine CA125. The voltage of photomultiplier tube was set to 800 V during ECL detection.

Results and discussion

Characterization of AgInS2/ZnS NCs

The PL spectrum of as-prepared dual-stabilizer-capped AgInS2/ZnS NCs with GSH and citric acid was characterized by a broad and symmetric PL band in the visible and near-infrared (NIR) region with maximum emission around 635 nm and full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) of 100 nm (Fig. 1A). It was similar to that of previously reported results, and this PL band originated to a large extent from inhomogeneous PL broadening [23]. The UV-vis absorption spectrum of AgInS2/ZnS NCs was featureless. It was worth noting that PLQY of AgInS2/ZnS NCs we prepared is as high as 61.7%. The PL decay curve of AgInS2/ZnS NCs could be well-fitted by a tri-exponential function (Fig. 1B), and the lifetime was as high as 1.8 μs (see Supplementary Information (ESM) Table S1), which can be attributed to the intrinsic defects and surface defects [27]. The multiexponential decay kinetics were PL properties inherent for these types of NCs and originate from the complicated structure of the low-energy states of the AgInS2/ZnS NCs [28].

Fig. 1
figure 1

(A) UV-vis absorption (a, black line) and PL (b, red line) spectra, (B) PL decay curve, (C) XRD pattern, and (D) HRTEM image and size distribution patterns (inset) of AgInS2/ZnS NCs

The XRD pattern demonstrated three main diffraction peaks with their 2θ value of 27.09°, 45.57°, and 53.54° located between cubic AgInS2 and ZnS respectively (Fig. 1C), which proved the successful preparation of the core-shell structure of AgInS2/ZnS NCs [23]. The HRTEM pattern showed that the AgInS2/ZnS NCs were spherical particles with an average size about 5 nm (Fig. 1D). They are uniformly monodispersed, which provided a basic condition for the subsequent biosensor application. The XPS patterns further confirm that AgInS2/ZnS NCs were composed of Ag, In, S, and Zn (ESM Fig. S1), and the element ratio of Ag: In: S: Zn was 0.33: 0.745: 2.18: 1.34, indicating the synthesis of AgInS2/ZnS NCs.

Co-reactant ECL of AgInS2/ZnS NCs in aqueous medium

The anode co-reactant, TPrA, can bring out oxidative-reduction ECL of NCs via electrochemical oxidation to produce strongly reducing radical species TPrA, and can also avoid the possible interference of dissolved oxygen. As shown in Fig. 2B, no obvious ECL was observed from bare GCE in 0.1 M pH 7.4 PB containing 10 mM TPrA (curve a, Fig. 2B), while the monodispersed AgInS2/ZnS NCs in aqueous medium exhibited efficient ECL emission with peak at 0.84 V (curve b, Fig. 2B) [29]. DPV was used to verify the accurate hole injection process of the AgInS2/ZnS NCs. The DPV curve of AgInS2/ZnS NCs displayed a hole-injecting process around 0.84 V (inset A of Fig. 2A). Hence, AgInS2/ZnS NCs can be electrochemically oxidized to one hole-charged state at 0.84 V. Forming a wide band gap ZnS shell around the AgInS2 core would make the AgInS2 core less sensitive to external environment and the hole injection process caused by electrochemical oxidation was critical for the formation of AgInS2/ZnS NCs redox ECL. The ECL spectrum of AgInS2/ZnS NCs containing TPrA showed obvious ECL signal with the maximum emission wavelength of 695 nm (inset B of Fig. 2B), and the ECL spectrum of AgInS2/ZnS NCs exhibited a red shift compared with PL spectrum. It suggests that the surface defects were not fully passivated in the redox carrier migration of anode ECL and hinder the radiation charge transfer during hole injection (ESM Fig. S2A) [30].

$$ \mathrm{TPrA}\to {\mathrm{TPrA}}^{\bullet +}+{\mathrm{e}}^{-}\kern0.5em \left(+0.66\ \mathrm{V}\right) $$
(1)
$$ {\mathrm{TPrA}}^{\bullet +}\to {\mathrm{TPrA}}^{\bullet }+{\mathrm{H}}^{+} $$
(2)
$$ {\mathrm{AgInS}}_2/\mathrm{ZnS}\ \mathrm{NCs}\to \mathrm{nR}{\left({\mathrm{AgInS}}_2/\mathrm{ZnS}\right)}^{+\bullet }+{\mathrm{ne}}^{-}\kern0.5em \left(+0.84\ \mathrm{V}\right) $$
(3)
$$ {\mathrm{nTPrA}}^{\bullet }+{\mathrm{AgInS}}_2/\mathrm{ZnS}\ \mathrm{NCs}\to {{\mathrm{nR}}_{\left({\mathrm{AgInS}}_2/\mathrm{ZnS}\right)}}^{-\bullet } $$
(4)
$$ {{\mathrm{R}}_{\left({\mathrm{AgInS}}_2/\mathrm{ZnS}\right)}}^{+\bullet }+{{\mathrm{R}}_{\left({\mathrm{AgInS}}_2/\mathrm{ZnS}\right)}}^{-\bullet}\to {{\mathrm{R}}_{\left({\mathrm{AgInS}}_2/\mathrm{ZnS}\right)}}^{\ast } $$
(5)
$$ \mathrm{R}{\left({\mathrm{AgInS}}_2/\mathrm{ZnS}\right)}^{\ast}\to {\mathrm{AgInS}}_2/\mathrm{ZnS}+\mathrm{hv}\kern0.5em \left(695\ \mathrm{nm}\right) $$
(6)
Fig. 2
figure 2

(A) CV and (B) ECL profiles of (a) bare GCE and (b) 0.5 mg/mL AgInS2/ZnS NCs in 0.1 M pH 7.4 PB containing 10 mM TPrA at 50 mV/s. Inset of A: DPV profiles of (a) bare GCE and (b) 0.5 mg/mL AgInS2/ZnS NCs in 0.1 M pH 7.4 PB. Inset of B: Corresponding ECL spectra of Fig. 2B by collecting all the photons generated via scanning the potential from 0 to 1.6 V for one cycle at 50 mV/s

The valence bands (VB) of AgInS2/ZnS NCs can be injected with holes to produce NCs of hole-injected states (AgInS2/ZnS•+) via electrochemically oxidizing them respectively (Eq. 3), while the conduction band (CB) of AgInS2/ZnS NCs can be injected with electrons to produce NCs of electron-injected states via reducing the NCs with strong reducing radical TPrA (eq. 4). The TPrA is generated via electrochemically oxidizing TPrA (Eqs. 1 and 2). The radiative charge transfer/recombination between NCs of hole-injected and electron-injected states eventually produce NCs of excited states for ECL (Eqs. 5 and 6).

Characterization of AgInS2/ZnS NCs and the Ab2-AgInS2/ZnS conjugates

The ECL spectrum of AgInS2/ZnS NCs/TPrA showed a broad peak with maximum wavelength at 695 nm (curve b, ESM Fig. S2A). The ECL of AgInS2/ZnS NCs/TPrA was red shifted by ~ 60 nm with respect to AgInS2/ZnS NCs PL spectrum (curve a, ESM Fig. S2A) and has a similar color to the ECL of Ru(bpy)3 2+/TPrA. These results indicated that surface defects still played an important role in the electrochemical redox-induced radiative charge transfer of AgInS2/ZnS NCs. Importantly, the ECL spectrum of surface-confined AgInS2/ZnS NCs on GCE|ABA-Ab1<CA125>Ab2-AgInS2/ZnS was almost the same as that of monodispersed AgInS2/ZnS NCs with maximum emission around 95 nm (curves b and c, ESM Fig. S2A). This indicates that the L-glutathione- and citrate-stabilized AgInS2/ZnS NCs preserved their surface states very well via complicated labeling and bioreaction processes, and AgInS2/ZnS NCs was expected to be used for ECL labeling in biological assay.

As shown in Fig. S2B, both AgInS2/ZnS NCs and Ab2-AgInS2/ZnS conjugates revealed effective ECL in 0.10 M pH 7.4 PB containing 10 mM TPrA. This undoubtedly showed that the ECL of AgInS2/ZnS NCs and Ab2-AgInS2/ZnS conjugates followed the typical ECL method of anode co-reactant. The Ab2-AgInS2/ZnS conjugate showed a good ECL-potential distribution at 0.0 v-1.6 v, although Ab2 might hinder the hole (or electron) injection process on the surface of AgInS2/ZnS NCs, resulting in lower ECL strength and higher potential compared with AgInS2/ZnS NCs.

Characterization of the ECL sensor with AgInS2/ZnS as tags

The fabrication procedure of ECL immunosensor, GCE|ABA-CA125 Ab1<CA125 antigen>CA125 Ab2-AgInS2/ZnS, was characterized with an equimolar mixture of 5.0 mM Fe(CN)63−/Fe(CN)64− redox couple in 0.10 M pH 7.4 PB as previously reported (Fig. 3A). The bare GCE showed a pair of symmetrical reversible with redox peak potential separation (ΔEp) of 70 mV (curve a). The ΔEp was increased significantly and the peak currents are dropped sharply after ABA was deposited on the surface of the GCE, which can be attributed to the electrostatic repulsion of Fe(CN)63−/Fe(CN)64− and ABA with negative charge. A decrease of ΔEp with increased current was observed after ABA|GCE was immobilized with Ab1 and treated with BSA (curve c), because of the decrease in the effective surface area of ABA|GCE and partially restored redox of Fe(CN)63−/Fe(CN)64− couple. The currents of redox peak decrease obviously with the increase of ΔEp after further modification of antigen (curve d) and Ab2|AgInS2/ZnS (curve e). The redox electron transfer of the redox probes was blocked with the formation of larger molecular weight immune complexes with bigger steric hindrance, demonstrating the assembly of the sandwich-type ECL immunosensors as expected.

Fig. 3
figure 3

(A) CV behaviors of (a) bare GCE, (b) GCE|ABA, (c) GCE|ABA-Ab1, (d)GCE|ABA-Ab1<CA125, and (e) GCE|ABA-Ab1<CA125>Ab2-AgInS2/ZnS in 0.1 M pH 7.4 PB containing 5.0 mM K3Fe(CN)6/K4Fe(CN)6. (B) ECL profiles of (a) bare GCE, (b) GCE|ABA, (c) GCE|ABA-Ab1, (d) GCE|ABA-Ab1<CA125, and (e) GCE|ABA-Ab1<CA125>Ab2-AgInS2/ZnS in 0.1 M pH 7.4 PB containing 10 mM TPrA at 50 mV/s. The concentration of CA125 sample was 10−2 U/mL

According to Fig. 3B, no ECL signal was observed with bare GCE (curve a), GCE|ABA (curve b), GCE|ABA-Ab1 (curve c), and GCE|ABA-Ab1<CA125 antigen (curve d) in 0.1 M pH 7.4 PB containing 10 mM TPrA, but the GCE|ABA-Ab1<CA125 antigen>Ab2|AgInS2/ZnS (curve e) exhibited efficient ECL in the same solution. It provides an unambiguous evidence that AgInS2/ZnS NCs was immobilized onto GCE surface via the proposed sandwich-typed immunosensing strategy [31].

Bioassay performance of ECL of AgInS2/ZnS NCs

According to Fig. 4, ECL-potential profiles of GCE|ABA-CA125 Ab1<CA125 antigen>CA125 Ab2|AgInS2/ZnS formed with different concentrations of CA125 sample were similar to each other with peak potential around 1.08 V. The spectral ECL response of GCE|ABA-CA125 Ab1<CA125 antigen>CA125 Ab2|AgInS2/ZnS increases gradually along with the incremental of CA125 concentration. The linear correlation between the peak potential of ECL-potential profiles and the logarithmic concentration of CA125 was obtained from 5 × 10−6 ~ 5 × 10−3 U/mL. Higher or lower concentration will deviate from the linear range. For example, in Fig. 4, when the concentration of the antigen to be detected was 5 × 10−2 U/mL or 10−2 U/mL, the linearity will deviate. Under the following conditions, the detection limit (LOD) was 10−6 U/mL, and the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) was 3.

Fig. 4
figure 4

ECL profiles of GCE|ABA-Ab1<CA125>Ab2-AgInS2/ZnS formed with (a) 0.0, (b) 10−6, (c) 5 × 10−6, (d) 10−5, (e) 5 × 10−5, (f) 10−4, (g) 5 × 10−4, (h) 10−3, (i) 5 × 10−3, (j) 10−2, (k) 5 × 10−2 U/mL CA125 by collecting all the photons generated via scanning the sensor in 0.1 M pH 7.4 PB containing 10 mM TPrA from 0 to 1.6 V for one cycle at 50 mV/s. Inset: corresponding calibration curve for CA125 determination

The performance of GCE|ABA-CA125 Ab1<CA125 antigen>CA125 Ab2|AgInS2/ZnS for determining CA125 was comparable with even higher ECL response, lower potential, and more sensitive than some recently reported ECL, DPV, EIS, chronoamperometry (CAMP), fluorescence assays compared to other ternary I–III–IV NCs (ESM Table S1) [32,33,34,35,36,37]. It was certain that the biosensor we developed has a significant improvement over other methods in the ultrasensitive detection of CA125.

Characteristics of ECL biosensor based on AgInS2/ZnS NCs

Reproducibility of the ECL-potential immunosensor was tested at a set of CA125 concentrations, and each of them was repeated for five times (Fig. 5A). The maximum relative standard deviation of the ECL intensity at peak potential of GCE|ABA-CA125 Ab1<CA125 antigen>CA125 Ab2|AgInS2/ZnS of the same concentration was 5.7%. This clearly demonstrates that the preparation of ECL sensor has good reproducibility and feasibility of potential-based ECL analysis with AgInS2/ZnS NCs as label. In addition, no obvious ECL was detected with GCE|ABA-CA125 Ab1<CA125 antigen>CA125 Ab2|AgInS2/ZnS formed via the pure blank sample or the CA125 blank sample containing some other high concentration interfering proteins, such as PSA, CEA, and BSA (Fig. 5B). The efficient ECL response with the sample only containing with 10−4 U/mL CA125, which indicates that GCE|ABA-CA125 Ab1<CA125 antigen>CA125 Ab2|AgInS2/ZnS, was highly specific to the target molecule CA125. In addition, compared with the sample containing only 1 × 10−4 U/mL CA125, it contained 1 × 10−4 U/mL CA125 and several other three interfering proteins (such as PSA, CEA, and BSA) at the same level. The mixture sample will only bring out slightly increased ECL response (~ 1.6%). It was clear that GCE|ABA-CA125 Ab1<CA125 antigen>CA125 Ab2|AgInS2/ZnS also exhibited acceptable specificity.

Fig. 5
figure 5

(A) Parallel tests for CA125 determination by the maximum intensity on the ECL profiles of GCE|ABA-Ab1<CA125>Ab2-AgInS2/ZnS formed with CA125 at (a) 0.0, (b) 10−6, (c) 5 × 10−6, (d) 10−5, (e) 5 × 10−5, (f) 10−4, (g) 5 × 10−4, (h) 10−3, (i) 5 × 10−3, (j) 10−2, (k) 5 × 10−2 U/mL levels, respectively. (B) The specificity of the ECL immunoassay. The bars represent the maximum emission on ECL profiles of GCE|ABA-Ab1<CA125>Ab2-AgInS2/ZnS formed with (a) blank, (b) 1 μg/mL PSA, (c) 1 μg/mL CEA, (d) 1 μg/mL AFP, (e) 10−4 U/mL CA125, respectively, and (f) the mixture of above

Real sample analysis

The standard addition method was used to detect human serum samples to verify the accuracy and analytical reliability of the constructed ECL immunosensor. The concentration of CA125 in the actual sample was 20 U/mL, and we diluted the serum sample with 10 mM PBS to 0.20 mU/mL to make the concentration within the range of the standard curve. As shown in ESM Table S3, the relative standard deviation (RSD) of human serum samples were 6.22%, 6.52%, and 2.58%, respectively. The average recovery rates were 100.4%, 99.9%, and 101.2%, respectively. The results showed that the method has high accuracy, and the prepared ECL immunosensor can be better applied to detection in actual samples.

Conclusions

In summary, a convenient ECL biosensor for detecting tumor marker CA125 of ovarian cancer was developed, in which nontoxic AgInS2/ZnS NCs in aqueous medium used as ECL illuminant exhibited excellent ECL performance with the existence of co-reactant TPrA. It should be noted that the AgInS2/ZnS NCs could be electrochemically oxidized to hole-injected states at 0.84 V, and co-reactant-type ECL was generated with TPrA through carrier migration. The bio-label can determine CA125 from 5 × 10−6 to 5 × 10−3 U/mL with the limit of detection at 1 × 10−6 U/mL (S/N = 3). The novel ECL immunosensing strategy based on ternary metal chalcogenides at low ECL triggering potential would provide an easy-to-use, sensitive, and reliable platform for detecting tumor markers in clinical samples as an ultrasensitive analytical technique.