Abstract
Poincaré-Sobolev-type inequalities involving rearrangement-invariant norms on the entire \(\mathbb R^n\) are provided. Namely, inequalities of the type \(\Vert u-P\Vert _{Y(\mathbb R^n)}\le C\Vert \nabla ^m u\Vert _{X(\mathbb R^n)}\), where X and Y are either rearrangement-invariant spaces over \(\mathbb R^n\) or Orlicz spaces over \(\mathbb R^n\), u is a \(m-\)times weakly differentiable function whose gradient is in X, P is a polynomial of order at most \(m-1\), depending on u, and C is a constant independent of u, are studied. In a sense optimal rearrangement-invariant spaces or Orlicz spaces Y in these inequalities when the space X is fixed are found. A variety of particular examples for customary function spaces are also provided.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Poincaré-Sobolev-type inequalities indisputably play a prominent role not only in the theory of Sobolev spaces but also in a wide range of applications in analysis of partial differential equations, calculus of variations, mathematical modeling or harmonic analysis (e.g. [5, 20, 44]). These types of inequalities have been exhaustively studied for decades and have been generalized in many different directions (e.g. [3, 10, 21, 25, 30, 36]). The standard Poincaré-Sobolev inequality on balls (e.g. [29, Corollary 1.64]) can be stated as follows: if \(p\in [1,n)\), \(n\ge 2\) (we assume this implicitly in the entire paper from now on), and \(q\in [1,\frac{np}{n-p}]\), then there exists a constant C, depending on p,q and on the dimension n only, such that
where \(\bar{u}_B\) is the integral mean of u over B (the mean is well defined, see Sect. 2), for each ball \(B\subseteq \mathbb R^n\) with the radius r and each weakly differentiable function u in B whose gradient belongs to \(L^p(B)\). With q equal to the critical Sobolev exponent \(\frac{np}{n-p}\), (1.1) reads as
Note that the inequality does not depend on the radius r in this case. If \(p=n\), then (1.1) holds for each \(q\in [1,\infty )\), but there is no optimal Lebesgue exponent q that would render that inequality independent of r as was possible with \(p\in [1,n)\) and \(q=\frac{np}{n-p}\). Nevertheless, the situation can be salvaged by introducing a finer scale of function spaces than the scale of Lebesgue spaces. Namely, if we substitute the critical Lebesgue space \(L^n(B)\) with the smaller Lorentz space \(L^{n,1}(B)\) (see Sect. 2 for the definition of Lorentz spaces), it can be proved (cf. [34, 37]) that
The inequalities (1.2) and (1.3) suggest that this type of inequality might be possibly extended to the case where balls are replaced with the entire \(\mathbb R^n\) provided that we find an appropriate replacement for \(\bar{u}_B\). It was shown in [29], Theorem 1.78] (cf. [24]) that the inequality (1.2) can be extended to the entire space. More precisely, they proved that if \(p\in [1,n)\), then for each weakly differentiable function u in \(\mathbb R^n\) whose gradient belongs to \(L^p(\mathbb R^n)\), there exists a (unique) \(\lambda \in \mathbb R\), depending on u, such that
where the constant C is independent of u. However, the method of their proof cannot be used for extending the inequality (1.3) to the entire space. Nevertheless, in [38], Theorem 3.7] (see also [38, Theorem 3.10] for a higher-order version) different techniques were used to prove that there exists a positive constant C such that for each weakly differentiable function u in \(\mathbb R^n\) whose gradient belongs to \(L^{n,1}(\mathbb R^n)\), there exists a \(\lambda \in \mathbb R\), depending on u, such that
In this paper, not only do we present a uniform method that covers both inequalities (1.4) and (1.5) in a single theorem (see Theorem 3.1), but we also study these types of inequalities in much more general setting and provide, in a sense, a sharp version of such an inequality. As the discussion before (1.3) suggests, the class of Lebesgue spaces is often not sufficiently fine and one needs to work with more delicate classes of function spaces, especially when limiting cases are considered. For this reason, we shall work within the rich class of rearrangement-invariant spaces, which are, loosely speaking, Banach spaces of functions whose norms depend merely on the size of functions (for precise definitions, see Sect. 2). This class contains a large number of customary function spaces (e.g. Lebesgue spaces, Lorentz spaces, Orlicz spaces, etc.) and together with rearrangement techniques is also well established in the study of Sobolev-type inequalities and related topics (e.g. [7, 23, 27, 41, 42]), which makes it a natural choice for our purposes. The preceding discussion also suggests that Poincaré-Sobolev-type inequalities on the entire space are closely connected with optimal function norms in Sobolev embedding theorems (e.g. [1, 11, 16, 26]).
Our main results are contained in Sect. 3. We prove that, among other things, for each \(m-\)times weakly differentiable function u in \(\mathbb R^n\) whose \(m-\)th order derivatives belong to a rearrangement-invariant space \(X(\mathbb R^n)\), there exists, under a natural assumption imposed on the space X, a polynomial P of order at most \(m-1\) such that
where \(X^m(\mathbb R^n)\) is another rearrangement-invariant space and where the constant C is independent of u. The space \(X^m(\mathbb R^n)\) is, in fact, the optimal rearrangement-invariant space (i.e. the space with the strongest rearrangement-invariant norm possible) that renders the inequality
where \(V_0^m X(\mathbb R^n)\) is the space of all \(m-\)times weakly differentiable functions whose \(m-\)th order derivatives belong to \(X(\mathbb R^n)\) and whose derivatives up to order \(m-1\) have “some decay at infinity”, true (see [31] for more detail on this matter). In particular, if we plug \(X=L^p\) for \(p\in [1,n)\) into (1.6) with \(m=1\), it reads as
which is a substantial improvement over (1.4) because the Lorentz norm \(\Vert \cdot \Vert _{L^{\frac{np}{n-p},p}(\mathbb R^n)}\) is strictly stronger than the Lebesgue norm \(\Vert \cdot \Vert _{L^{\frac{np}{n-p}}(\mathbb R^n)}\). If we plug \(X=L^{n,1}\) into (1.6) with \(m=1\), we recover (1.5).
An immediate important consequence of our results (namely Theorem 3.1 and Theorem 5.1) is that the weakly differentiable functions on \(\mathbb R^n\) whose gradient belong to the Lorentz space \(L^{n, 1}(\mathbb R^n)\) are not only continuous (more precisely, have continuous representatives) but also bounded. Surprisingly enough, whereas the remarkable result of Stein’s that the weakly differentiable functions on \(\mathbb R^n\) whose gradient belong (locally) to the Lorentz space \(L^{n, 1}(\mathbb R^n)\) have continuous representatives [40] has been known for many years and is well-established, the boundedness of such functions is a quite recent result (recall that we assume that \(n\ge 2\)). To the best of our knowledge, the first result in this direction was provided by Tartar in 1998. It follows from [42, Theorem 8 and Remark 9] that if \(|\nabla u|\in L^{n, 1}(\mathbb R^n)\), then u is bounded on \(\mathbb R^n\) provided that u has “some decay at infinity”, that is, \(\left| \left\{ x\in \mathbb R^n:|u(x)|>\lambda \right\} \right| <\infty \) for each \(\lambda >0\). However, it was not until 2018 that Rabier proved in his recent paper [38] that no assumptions on decay at infinity are, in fact, required. We recover his interesting result as a corollary of our general results by completely different means (see Remark 5.2).
Although the class of rearrangement-invariant spaces is very rich and contains many customary function spaces, it is sometimes useful in applications to work within a narrower class of function spaces. A typical example of such a class is that of Orlicz spaces, which is an irreplaceable tool for analysing partial differential equations having a non-polynomial growth (e.g. [2, 18, 43]). This motivates Sect. 4, where we provide a result similar to (1.6) but the spaces on both sides of (1.6) are from the narrower class of Orlicz spaces only.
Lastly, we provide a variety of particular examples of the inequality (1.6) for customary function spaces in Sect. 5. These examples include Lebesgue spaces, Lorentz spaces or Orlicz spaces.
2 Preliminaries
Throughout this section, let \((R,\mu )\) be a \(\sigma \)-finite nonatomic measure space. We collect all the background material that will be used in this paper here. We set
and
The (unsigned) nonincreasing rearrangement \(f^*:(0,\infty ) \rightarrow [0, \infty ]\) of a function \(f\in \mathfrak M(R,\mu )\) is defined as
We also define the signed nonincreasing rearrangement \(f^\circ :(0,\infty ) \rightarrow [-\infty , \infty ]\) of a function \(f\in \mathfrak M(R,\mu )\) as
The maximal nonincreasing rearrangement \(f^{**}:(0,\infty ) \rightarrow [0, \infty ]\) of a function \(f\in \mathfrak M(R,\mu )\) is defined as
If \(|f|\le |g|\) \(\mu \)-a.e. in R, then \(f^*\le g^*\).
If \((R,\mu )\) and \((S,\nu )\) are two (possibly different) \(\sigma \)-finite measure spaces, we say that functions \(f\in \mathfrak M(R,\mu )\) and \(g\in \mathfrak M(S,\nu )\) are equimeasurable if \(f^*=g^*\) on \((0,\infty )\). Functions f, \(f^*\) and \(f^\circ \) are equimeasurable.
A functional \(\varrho :\mathfrak M_+ (R,\mu ) \rightarrow [0,\infty ]\) is called a Banach function norm if, for all f, g and \(\{f_j\}_{j\in \mathbb N}\) in \(\mathfrak M_+(R,\mu )\), and every \(\lambda \ge 0\), the following properties hold:
-
(P1)
\(\varrho (f)=0\) if and only if \(f=0\); \(\varrho (\lambda f)= \lambda \varrho (f)\); \(\varrho (f+g)\le \varrho (f)+ \varrho (g)\) (the norm axiom);
-
(P2)
\( f \le g\) a.e. implies \(\varrho (f)\le \varrho (g)\) (the lattice axiom);
-
(P3)
\( f_j \nearrow f\) a.e. implies \(\varrho (f_j) \nearrow \varrho (f)\) (the Fatou axiom);
-
(P4)
\(\varrho (\chi _E)<\infty \) for every \(E\subseteq R\) of finite measure (the nontriviality axiom);
-
(P5)
if E is a subset of R of finite measure, then \(\int _{E} f\,{d}\mu \le C_E \varrho (f)\) for a positive constant \(C_E\), depending possibly on E and \(\varrho \) but independent of f (the local embedding in \(L^1\)).
If, in addition, \(\varrho \) satisfies
-
(P6)
\(\varrho (f) = \varrho (g)\) whenever \(f^* = g^ *\)(the rearrangement-invariance axiom),
then we say that \(\varrho \) is a rearrangement-invariant norm.
If \(\varrho \) is a rearrangement-invariant norm, then the collection
is called a rearrangement-invariant space, sometimes we shortly write just an r.i. space, corresponding to the norm \(\varrho \). We shall write \(\Vert f\Vert _{X}\) instead of \(\varrho (|f|)\). Note that the quantity \(\Vert f\Vert _{X}\) is defined for every \(f\in \mathfrak M(R,\mu )\), and
Every rearrangement-invariant space X satisfies
that is, each function from X can be written as a sum of a \((R,\mu )-\)integrable function and a \((R,\mu )-\)essentially bounded function, and is, in particular, finite \(\mu -\)a.e. (see [4, Chapter 1, Theorem 1.4, Chapter 2, Theorem 6.6]).
With any rearrangement-invariant function norm \(\varrho \), there is associated another functional, \(\varrho '\), defined for \(g \in \mathfrak M_+(R,\mu )\) as
It turns out that \(\varrho '\) is also a rearrangement-invariant norm, which is called the associate norm of \(\varrho \). Moreover, for every rearrangement-invariant norm \(\varrho \) and every \(f\in \mathfrak M_+(R,\mu )\), we have (see [4, Chapter 1, Theorem 2.9])
If \(\varrho \) is a rearrangement-invariant norm, \(X=X({\varrho })\) is the rearrangement-invariant space determined by \(\varrho \), and \(\varrho '\) is the associate norm of \(\varrho \), then the function space \(X({\varrho '})\) determined by \(\varrho '\) is called the associate space of X and is denoted by \(X'\). We always have \((X')'=X\) (see [4, Chapter 1, Theorem 2.7]), and we shall write \(X''\) instead of \((X')'\). Furthermore, the Hölder inequality
holds for every \(f,g\in \mathfrak M(R,\mu )\).
For every rearrangement-invariant space X over the measure space \((R,\mu )\), there exists a unique rearrangement-invariant space \(X(0,\mu (R))\) over the interval \((0,\mu (R))\) endowed with the one-dimensional Lebesgue measure such that \(\Vert f\Vert _X=\Vert f^*\Vert _{X(0,\mu (R))}\) (see [4, Chapter 2, Theorem 4.10]). This space is called the representation space of X. Throughout this paper, the representation space of a rearrangement-invariant space X will be denoted by \(X(0,\mu (R))\). When \(R=(0,\infty )\) and \(\mu \) is the Lebesgue measure, every rearrangement-invariant space X over \((R,\mu )\) coincides with its representation space.
If \(\varrho \) is a rearrangement-invariant norm and \(X=X({\varrho })\) is the rearrangement-invariant space determined by \(\varrho \), we define its fundamental function, \(\varphi _X\), by
where \(E\subseteq R\) is such that \(\mu (E)=t\). The property (P6) of rearrangement-invariant norms and the fact that \(\chi _E^* = \chi _{(0, \mu (E))}\) guarantee that the fundamental function is well defined. Moreover, one has
Basic examples of function norms are those associated with the standard Lebesgue spaces \(L^ p\). For \(p\in (0,\infty ]\), we define the functional \(\varrho _p\) by
for \(f \in \mathfrak M_+(R,\mu )\). If \(p\in [1,\infty ]\), then \(\varrho _p\) is a rearrangement-invariant function norm.
If \(0< p,q\le \infty \), we define the functional \(\varrho _{p,q}\) by
for \(f \in \mathfrak M_+(R,\mu )\). The set \(L^{p,q}\), defined as the collection of all \(f\in \mathfrak M(R,\mu )\) satisfying \(\varrho _{p,q}(|f|)<\infty \), is called a Lorentz space. If \(1<p<\infty \) and \(1\le q\le \infty \), or \(p=q=1\), or \(p=q=\infty \), then \(\varrho _{p,q}\) is equivalent to a rearrangement-invariant function norm in the sense that there exists a rearrangement-invariant norm \(\sigma \) and a constant C, \(0<C<\infty \), depending on p, q but independent of f, such that
As a consequence, \(L^{p,q}\) is considered to be a rearrangement-invariant space for the above specified cases of p, q (see [4, Chapter 4]). If either \(0<p<1\) or \(p=1\) and \(q>1\), then \(L^{p,q}\) is a quasi-normed space. If \(p=\infty \) and \(q<\infty \), then \(L^{p,q}=\{0\}\). For every \(p\in [1,\infty ]\), we have \(L^{p,p}=L^{p}\). Furthermore, if \(p,q,r\in (0,\infty ]\) and \(q\le r\), then the inclusion \(L^{p,q}\subset L^{p,r}\) holds.
If \({\mathbb A}=[\alpha _0,\alpha _{\infty }]\in \mathbb R^ 2\) and \(t\in \mathbb R\), then we shall use the notation \({\mathbb A}+t=[\alpha _0+t,\alpha _{\infty }+t]\) and \(t{\mathbb A}=[t\alpha _0, t\alpha _{\infty }]\).
Let \(0<p,q\le \infty \), \({\mathbb A}=[\alpha _0,\alpha _{\infty }]\in \mathbb R^ 2\) and \({\mathbb B}=[\beta _0,\beta _{\infty }]\in \mathbb R^ 2\). Then we define the functionals \(\varrho _{p,q;{\mathbb A}}\) and \(\varrho _{p,q;{\mathbb A},{\mathbb B}}\) on \(\mathfrak M_+(R,\mu )\) as
and
where
and
The sets \(L^{p,q;{\mathbb A}}\) and \(L^{p,q;{\mathbb A},{\mathbb B}}\), defined as the collections of all \(f\in \mathfrak M(R,\mu )\) satisfying \(\varrho _{p,q;{\mathbb A}}(|f|)<\infty \) and \(\varrho _{p,q;{\mathbb A},{\mathbb B}}(|f|)<\infty \), respectively, are called Lorentz–Zygmund spaces. The functions of the form \(\ell ^{{\mathbb A}}\), \(\ell \ell ^{{\mathbb B}}\) are called broken logarithmic functions. It can be shown ([35, Theorem 7.1]) that the functional \(\varrho _{p,q;{\mathbb A}}\) is equivalent to a rearrangement-invariant function norm if and only if
The spaces of this type provide a common roof for many customary spaces. These include not only Lebesgue spaces and Lorentz spaces, by taking \({\mathbb A}=[0,0]\), but also all types of exponential and logarithmic Zygmund classes, and also the spaces discovered independently by Maz’ya (in a somewhat implicit form involving capacitary estimates [30]), pp. 105 and 109] Hansson [22] and Brézis–Wainger [6], who used it to describe the sharp target space in a limiting Sobolev embedding (the spaces can be also traced in the works of Brudnyi [8] and, in a more general setting, Cwikel and Pustylnik [17]). One of the benefits of using broken logarithmic functions consists in the fact that the underlying measure space can be considered to have either finite or infinite measure. For the detailed study of Lorentz–Zygmund spaces we refer the reader to [35]. In some examples presented in this paper we shall need more than two layers of logarithms. Such spaces are defined as straightforward extensions of the spaces defined above.
Another very important class of rearrangement-invariant spaces is the class of Orlicz spaces. A convex, left-continuous function \(A:[0, \infty ) \rightarrow [0, \infty ]\), neither identically zero nor infinity on \((0,\infty )\), vanishing at 0 is called a Young function. Hence any Young function can be expressed in the form
for some nondecreasing, left-continuous function \(a:[0, \infty )\rightarrow [0, \infty ]\). Given a Young function A we define the Luxemburg norm \(\Vert \cdot \Vert _{L^A}\) as
The corresponding rearrangement-invariant space \(L^A\) is called an Orlicz space. In particular, \(L^A= L^p\) if \(A(t)= t^p\) when \(p \in [1, \infty )\), and \(L^A= L^\infty \) if \(A(t)=0\) for \(t\in [0, 1]\) and \(A(t) = \infty \) for \(t>1\). We refer the interested reader to [28, 39] for more details on Orlicz spaces.
We say that a Young function A dominates a Young function B near zero or near infinity if there exist positive constants c and \(t_0\) such that
We say that two Young functions A and B are equivalent near zero or near infinity if they dominate each other near zero or near infinity, respectively.
If, for \(F\in \mathfrak M_+(0,\infty )\), there exists \(t_0>0\) such that \(\int _0^{t_0}F(s)\,{d}s<\infty \) or \(\int _{t_0}^\infty F(s)\,{d}s<\infty \), respectively, we shortly write that
It there does not exist such a \(t_0>0\), we write
A common extension of Orlicz and Lorentz spaces is provided by the family of Orlicz-Lorentz spaces. Given \(p\in (1, \infty )\), \(q\in [1, \infty )\) and a Young function A such that
we denote by \(\Vert \cdot \Vert _{L(p,q,A)}\) the Orlicz-Lorentz rearrangement-invariant function norm defined as
The fact that (2.6) actually defines a rearrangement-invariant function norm follows from simple variants in the proof of [12, Proposition 2.1]. We denote by L(p, q, A) the Orlicz-Lorentz space associated with the rearrangement-invariant function norm \(\Vert \cdot \Vert _{L(p,q, A)}\). Note that the class of Orlicz-Lorentz spaces includes (up to equivalent norms) the Orlicz spaces and various instances of Lorentz and Lorentz-Zygmund spaces.
In what follows we shortly denote the Lebesgue measure of a measurable set \(E\subseteq \mathbb R^n\) by |E|.
If X is a rearrangement-invariant space over \(\mathbb R^n\) and \(G\subseteq \mathbb R^n\) is a measurable set, we denote by X(G) the rearrangement-invariant space over G corresponding to the rearrangement-invariant norm
where \(\tilde{f}\) is the continuation of f by 0 to \(\mathbb R^n\).
Let \(G\subseteq \mathbb R^n\) be an open set. We shall work with Sobolev-type spaces built upon rearrangement-invariant spaces. If \(m\in \mathbb N\) and u is a m-times weakly differentiable function on G, we denote by \(\nabla ^k u\), for \(k\in \{0, 1,\dots , m\}\), the vector of all \(k-\)th order weak derivatives of u on G, where \(\nabla ^0 u = u\). If X(G) is a rearrangement-invariant space over G, we define the space \(V^m X(G)\) by
We stress the fact that, for a function from \(V^m X(G)\), only its m-th order derivatives are required to be elements of X(G), whereas there are no assumptions imposed on its derivatives of lower orders. The derivatives of lower orders are not required to have any regularity, we merely assume that they exist. We also write \(\Vert \nabla ^k u\Vert _X\) instead of \(\Vert |\nabla ^k u|\Vert _X\) for the sake of brevity, where \(|\nabla ^k u|\) is the \(\ell ^1\)-norm of the vector \(\nabla ^k u\).
We have that
by [30, Theorem 5.2.3]; hence the integral mean \(\frac{1}{|B|}\int _B u(x)\ {d}x\) of \(u\in V^m X(B)\) is a well-defined finite number for each ball in \(\mathbb R^n\).
Throughout the paper the convention that \(\frac{1}{\infty }=0\) and \(0\cdot \infty =0\) is used without further explicit reference. If A is a Young function that is equal to zero on \([0,t_0]\), then we interpret \(\frac{1}{A(t)}\) as \(\infty \) for \(t\in [0,t_0]\). We write \(P\lesssim Q\) when \(P\le \text {constant}\cdot Q\) where the constant is independent of appropriate quantities appearing in expressions P and Q. Similarly, we write \(P > rsim Q\) with the obvious meaning. We also write \(P\approx Q\) when \(P\lesssim Q\) and \(P > rsim Q\) simultaneously.
3 Poincaré-Sobolev inequalities in rearrangement-invariant spaces
The following theorem is the main result of this paper.
Theorem 3.1
Let X be a rearrangement-invariant space over \(\mathbb R^n\) and \(m\in \mathbb N\), \(m < n\). Assume that \(t^{\frac{m}{n} - 1}\chi _{(1,\infty )}(t)\in X'(0,\infty )\). Then \(X^m=X^m(\sigma _m')\), where the rearrangement-invariant norm \(\sigma _m\) is defined by
is a rearrangement-invariant space over \(\mathbb R^n\) and there exists a positive constant C, depending on m and on the dimension n only, such that for each \(u\in V^mX(\mathbb R^n)\) there exists a polynomial P of order at most \(m-1\), depending on u, that renders the inequality
true. Furthermore, if P and \(\widetilde{P}\) are such polynomials, then \(P - \widetilde{P}\) is a constant polynomial.
Moreover, if \(\lim \limits _{t\rightarrow \infty }\varphi _{X^m}(t)=\infty \), then these polynomials are unique.
Remark 3.2
For example, the condition \(t^{\frac{m}{n} - 1}\chi _{(1,\infty )}(t)\in X'(0,\infty )\) is satisfied for \(X=L^p\) when \(p\in [1,\frac{n}{m})\), and for \(X=L^{\frac{n}{m},1}\).
Furthermore, the condition \(t^{\frac{m}{n} - 1}\chi _{(1,\infty )}(t)\in X'(0,\infty )\) is precisely the condition that ensures the existence of the optimal rearrangement-invariant norm \(\Vert \cdot \Vert _{Y}\) in the inequality
where \(V_0^mX(\mathbb R^n)\) is the space of those functions u from \(V^mX(\mathbb R^n)\) that satisfy the conditions \(|\{x\in \mathbb R^n:|\nabla ^ku(x)|>\lambda \}|<\infty \) for each \(\lambda >0\) and each \(k\in \{0,1,\dots ,m-1\}\). More precisely, it was proved in [31, Theorem 3.1] that if \(t^{\frac{m}{n} - 1}\chi _{(1,\infty )}(t)\in X'(0,\infty )\), then
where the rearrangement-invariant space \(X^m\) is defined as in the theorem above, and the space \(X^m\) is the optimal (i.e. the smallest) possible rearrangement-invariant space that renders (3.2) true, that is, if (3.2) is satisfied for a rearrangement-invariant space Y, then \(X^m\subseteq Y\). On the other hand, if \(t^{\frac{m}{n} - 1}\chi _{(1,\infty )}(t)\notin X'(0,\infty )\), then there exist no rearrangement-invariant spaces Y rendering (3.2) true.
In light of this remark, the condition \(t^{\frac{m}{n} - 1}\chi _{(1,\infty )}(t)\in X'(0,\infty )\) imposed in Theorem 3.1 is in fact natural and not restrictive.
Before we prove Theorem 3.1, we need to establish a few results of independent interest. We start with an inequality that can be viewed as a Poincaré-Sobolev-type inequality in rearrangement-invariant spaces. We note that even though a general version of a Poincaré-Sobolev-type inequality in rearrangement-invariant spaces was established in [9], Lemma 4.2] (cf. [13], Lemma 4.2]), their version is not sufficient for our purposes because we need better control over the multiplicative constant appearing there. Our proof is inspired by [14, Theorem 3.1].
Theorem 3.3
Let X and Y be rearrangement-invariant spaces over \(\mathbb R^n\). Assume that there exists a positive constant \(C_1\) such that
Then there exists a positive constant \(C_2\), which depends on \(C_1\) and on the dimension n only, such that
where \(\bar{u}_B\) is the integral mean of u over B, that is, \(\bar{u}_B = \frac{1}{|B|}\int _B u(x)\,{d}x\).
Proof
Note that \(\bar{u}_B\) is a well-defined finite number by (2.7). Since for any real number \(\gamma \) and a.e. \(x\in B\) we have, by the Hölder inequality (2.2), that
it follows from this estimate and (2.3) that
for each \(\gamma \in \mathbb R\). Since \(u^\circ \) is locally absolutely continuous ([15, Lemma 6.6]), we have that
Hence, by virtue of (3.4) and (3.5), it is sufficient to prove that
with a constant that depends only on \(C_1\) and on n. Since (3.3) is in force, we have that
It is well known (e.g. [45, Theorem 5.4.3]) that the isoperimetric function \(h_B\) of a ball \(B\subseteq \mathbb R^n\) satisfies
with a constant that depends only on the dimension n. Hence
where the last inequality is valid thanks to [13, Lemma 4.1]. Exploiting the rearrangement invariance and the fact that the transformation \(s\mapsto (|B| - s)\) is measure preserving on (0, |B|) several times (cf. [4, Chapter 2, Proposition 7.2]) together with (3.3), we estimate in a similar way to (3.7) and (3.8) that
Hence
Finally, the combination of (3.7), (3.8) and (3.9) establishes (3.6). \(\square \)
The following proposition tells us that a sequence of integral means of a function from \(V^1 X(\mathbb R^n)\) over increasing balls is bounded under an assumption on X. This enables us to find the desired polynomials in (1.6) later.
Proposition 3.4
Assume that X is a rearrangement-invariant space over \(\mathbb R^n\) that satisfies \(t^{\frac{1}{n} - 1}\chi _{(1,\infty )}(t)\in X'(0,\infty )\). Let \(u\in V^1 X(\mathbb R^n)\) and set
where \(B_k\) are balls in \(\mathbb R^n\) such that \(B_k\subseteq B_{k+1}\) for each \(k\in \mathbb N\). Then the sequence \(\{\lambda _k\}_{k=1}^\infty \) is bounded. In particular, it has a convergent subsequence.
Proof
Since \(t^{\frac{1}{n} - 1}\chi _{(1,\infty )}(t)\in X'(0,\infty )\), there exists a rearrangement-invariant space Y over \(\mathbb R^n\) such that \(I_1:X\rightarrow Y\) by [19, Theorem 6.3], where the operator \(I_1\) (the Riesz potential of order one) is defined, for a function \(f\in L^1_{\text {loc}}(\mathbb R^n)\), as \(I_1f(x)=\int _{\mathbb R^n}\frac{f(y)}{|x-y|^{n-1}}\,{d}y,\ x\in \mathbb R^n\). In particular, it follows that
by (2.1) and \(V^1X(\mathbb R^n)\subseteq L^1_{\text {loc}}(\mathbb R^n)\).
Note that we have that \(u\in L^1(B_k)\) and \(|\nabla u|\in L^1(B_k)\) for each \(k\in \mathbb N\) thanks to \(V^1X(\mathbb R^n)\subseteq L^1_{\text {loc}}(\mathbb R^n)\) and \(X\subseteq L^1_{\text {loc}}(\mathbb R^n)\). This allows us to exploit a standard potential estimate (e.g. [29, Lemma 1.50]) to obtain that
where the multiplicative constant depends on the dimension n only. Coupling (3.10) and (3.11) together, we obtain that there exists a point \(x_0\in B_1\subseteq B_k\) such that
whence the desired boundedness immediately follows from
\(\square \)
Now, we are finally prepared to prove our main result.
Proof of Theorem 3.1
We just remark that \(X^m\) is indeed a rearrangement-invariant space by [31, Theorem 3.1].
We start by proving the uniqueness part. Assume that for \(u\in V^mX(\mathbb R^n)\) there exist polynomials P and \(\widetilde{P}\) (of order at most \(m-1\)) such that
and also
Hence \(P-\widetilde{P}\in X^m\). Since \(X^m\subseteq (L^1+L^\infty )\) by (2.1), it follows that \(P-\widetilde{P}\) is a constant polynomial.
Moreover, we have that
where \(c=|P-\widetilde{P}|\) and \(E_k\subseteq \mathbb R^n\) are such that \(|E_k|=k\). Hence \(c=0\) if \(\lim \limits _{t\rightarrow \infty }\varphi _{X^m}(t)=\infty \).
We now proceed to prove the existence of such polynomials by induction on m. Assume that \(m=1\).
Let \(u\in V^1X(\mathbb R^n)\) and define
where \(B_k\) is the ball in \(\mathbb R^n\) centered at the origin having its radius equal to k. By Proposition 3.4 we may assume without loss of generality that there exists a \(\lambda \in \mathbb R\) such that
Since the inequality (3.3) with \(Y=X^1\) holds with \(C_1=1\) by virtue of [31, Theorem 3.3] and the definition of \(\sigma _m\), we have that
where the multiplicative constant depends only on m and on n, by Theorem 3.3. Furthermore, we have that
by (3.12). Hence
by Fatou’s lemma [4, Chapter 1, Theorem 1.7] and (3.13). This completes the proof for \(m=1\).
Finally, for the inductive step, assume that \(1<m<n\) and let \(u\in V^mX(\mathbb R^n)\). Then \(\frac{\partial ^{|\alpha |}u}{\partial ^\alpha x}\in V^1X(\mathbb R^n)\) for each multi-index \(\alpha \in \mathbb N_0^n\) such that \(|\alpha |=\alpha _1+\cdots +\alpha _n=m-1\). By the induction hypothesis for \(m=1\) (clearly \(t^{\frac{1}{n} - 1}\chi _{(1,\infty )}(t)\in X'(0,\infty )\) if \(t^{\frac{m}{n} - 1}\chi _{(1,\infty )}(t)\in X'(0,\infty )\)), there exist \(\lambda _\alpha \in \mathbb R\) such that
Set
Since
we have \(v\in V^{m-1}X^1(\mathbb R^n)\) by (3.14). By the induction hypothesis again (this time for \(m-1\)), there exists a polynomial Q of order at most \(m-2\) such that
where the first equivalence follows from [31, Theorem 3.2], the second equality is (3.15) and the last inequality is (3.14). We complete the proof by observing that \(Q+\sum \nolimits _{\begin{array}{c} \alpha \in \mathbb N_0^n\\ |\alpha |=m-1 \end{array}}\lambda _\alpha x^\alpha \) is a polynomial of order at most \(m-1\). \(\square \)
4 Poincaré-Sobolev inequalities in Orlicz spaces
In this section we provide a result concerning Orlicz spaces that is very similar to Theorem 3.1. The key difference here is that in the following theorem the resulting function norm is an Orlicz norm. In this section, we combine the results obtained in Sect.3 with the techniques developed in [33].
Let \(m < n\) and let A be a Young function satisfying
We set
where \(H_m\) is defined by
Note that \(H^\infty = \infty \) if and only if
Observe that \(H_m\) is an increasing function onto \([0, H_\infty )\) (see [32, Remark 3.3.1]); hence its inverse function \(H_m^{-1}\) is well defined on \([0, H_\infty )\). Lastly, we define
Theorem 4.1
Let \(m < n\) and let A be a Young function satisfying (4.1). Define the function \(A_m\) by
where the function \(D_m\) is defined by (4.2). Then \(A_m\) is a Young function and there exists a positive constant C such that for each \(u\in V^mL^A(\mathbb R^n)\) there exists a unique polynomial P of order at most \(m-1\), depending on u, that renders the inequality
true.
Proof
Set \(X=L^A\). Then, combining [31], Theorem 6.1] with [31, Theorem 3.1], \(A_m\) is a Young function, \(t^{\frac{m}{n} - 1}\chi _{(1,\infty )}(t)\in X'(0,\infty )\) and
where \(X^m\) is defined as in Theorem 3.1. Our claim then follows from Theorem 3.1. \(\square \)
Remark 4.2
If a Young function A satisfies (4.1), then \(t^{\frac{m}{n} - 1}\chi _{(1,\infty )}(t)\in X'(0,\infty )\), where \(X=L^A\). Therefore, we may use both Theorem 3.1 and Theorem 4.1. It follows (see the proof above) that
Hence the inequality that we obtain from Theorem 4.1 is weaker that the inequality that we obtain from Theorem 3.1. However, a possible advantage of Theorem 4.1 over Theorem 3.1, which may be useful in some applications, is that the resulting space \(L^{A_m}\) is again an Orlicz space, not a general rearrangement-invariant space.
Furthermore (cf. Remark 3.2), the convergence of the integral (4.1) is precisely the condition that ensures the existence of the optimal Orlicz norm \(\Vert \cdot \Vert _{L^B}\) in the inequality
More precisely, it follows from [31, Theorem 6.1] that, if a Young function A satisfies (4.1), then
where the Orlicz space \(L^{A_m}\) is defined as in the theorem above, and the space \(L^{A_m}\) is the optimal (i.e. the smallest) possible Orlicz space that renders (4.3) true, that is, if (4.3) is satisfied for an Orlicz space \(L^B\), then \(L^{A_m}\subseteq L^B\). On the other hand, if A does not satisfy (4.1), then there exist no Orlicz spaces \(L^B\) (in fact, even no rearrangement-invariant spaces at all, cf. [31, Theorem 5.2]) rendering (4.3) true.
5 Examples
In this section we provide important particular examples of possible applications of Theorem 3.1 and Theorem 4.1. These examples include a large number of customary function spaces (e.g. Lebesgue spaces, Lorentz spaces, Orlicz spaces, Zygmund classes, etc.).
The following theorem is a combination of Theorem 3.1 and [31, Theorem 5.1]
Theorem 5.1
Let \(m\in \mathbb N\), \(m < n\), and let \(p\in [1,\frac{n}{m}]\), \(q\in [1,\infty ]\) and \({\mathbb A}=[\alpha _0,\alpha _{\infty }]\in \mathbb R^2\). Then there exists a constant C such that for each \(u\in V^m L^{p, q; {\mathbb A}}(\mathbb R^n)\) there exists a polynomial P, which depends on u, of order at most \(m-1\) such that
where
where
Moreover, these polynomials P are unique in all the cases above except for the case \(p=\frac{n}{m}\), \(q=1\), and \(\alpha _\infty = 0\).
Remark 5.2
In particular, it follows from the theorem above that, if \(|\nabla u|\in L^{n,1}(\mathbb R^n)\), then u is bounded on \(\mathbb R^n\) (more precisely, its continuous representative is). If \(m\ge 2\) and \(|\nabla ^m u|\in L^{\frac{n}{m},1}(\mathbb R^n)\), then u need not be bounded on the entire space (consider, for example, \(u(x)=x\)), but it differs from a polynomial of order at most \(m-1\) by a bounded function on \(\mathbb R^n\). However, if \(|\nabla ^m u|\in L^{\frac{n}{m},1}(\mathbb R^n)\) (\(m\ge 2\)) and u has “some decay at infinity”, that is, \(\left| \left\{ x\in \mathbb R^n:|u(x)|>\lambda \right\} \right| <\infty \) for each \(\lambda >0\), it follows again that u is not only continuous but also bounded on the entire space.
Important examples of Orlicz spaces, frequently appearing in applications, are so-called Zygmund classes \(L^p\left( \log L\right) ^\alpha \) [46] and their different variations. It is worth noting that even though the more general variations of Zygmund classes contained in the following theorem are special instances of Lorentz-Zygmund spaces when \(p_0=p_\infty \) ([35, Chapter 8]), which were considered in the preceding theorem, and the Orlicz spaces \(L^B\) from the following theorem are in general “worse” (i.e. \(\Vert \cdot \Vert _{L^B}\) is a weaker norm than \(\Vert \cdot \Vert _{Y}\)) than the rearrangement-invariant spaces Y from the preceding theorem corresponding to the same \(X=L^A\) (see Remark 4.2), the importance of the following theorem stems from the fact that the spaces \(L^B\) themselves are from the narrower class of Orlicz spaces. The following theorem is a combination of Theorem 4.1 and [31, Theorem 6.3]
Theorem 5.3
Let \(m\in \mathbb N\), \(m < n\), and let \(p_0\in [1,\frac{n}{m}]\), \(p_\infty \in [1,\infty )\) and \(\alpha _0,\,\alpha _\infty \in \mathbb R\). Let A(t) be a Young function that is equivalent to
Then there exists a constant C such that for each \(u\in V^mL^A(\mathbb R^n)\) there exists a unique polynomial P, which depends on u, of order at most \(m-1\) such that
where the Young function B(t) is equivalent to
near zero and to
near infinity.
In our last example we couple Theorem 3.1 with [31, Theorem 5.2] to obtain a specific version of (3.1) when X is an Orlicz space \(L^A\). It turns out that we need to distinguish whether the integral
converges or diverges. Assume that \(m<n\) and that A is a Young function satisfying (4.1). Let a be the left-continuous derivative of A, that is, a and A are related as in (2.4). We define the function \(E_m\) by
where \(e_m\) is the nondecreasing, left-continuous function in \([0, \infty )\) whose generalized left-continuous inverse \(e_m^{-1}\) satisfies
Then \(E_m\) is a finite-valued Young function satisfying (2.5) with \(p = \frac{n}{m}\) (see [12, Proposition 2.2]).
Theorem 5.4
Let \(m\in \mathbb N\), \(m < n\), and let A be a Young function satisfying (4.1). Then there exists a constant C such that for each \(u\in V^m L^A(\mathbb R^n)\) there exists a polynomial P, which depends on u, of order at most \(m-1\) such that
where
The Young function \(E_m\) is defined by (5.2).
References
Alberico, A., Cianchi, A., Pick, L., Slavíková, L.: Sharp Sobolev type embeddings on the entire Euclidean space. Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 17(5), 2011–2037 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3934/cpaa.2018096. ISSN 1534-0392
Alves, C.O., Figueiredo, G.M., Santos, J.A.: Strauss and Lions type results for a class of Orlicz-Sobolev spaces and applications. Topol. Methods Nonlinear Anal. 44(2), 435–456 (2014). https://doi.org/10.12775/TMNA.2014.055. ISSN 1230-3429
Amick, C.J.: Some remarks on Rellich’s theorem and the Poincaré inequality. J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 18(1), 81–93 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1112/jlms/s2-18.1.81. ISSN 0024-6107
Bennett, C., Sharpley, R.: Interpolation of operators, volume 129 of Pure and Applied Mathematics. Academic Press, Inc., Boston, MA, (1988). ISBN 0-12-088730-4
Bhattacharya, T., Leonetti, F.: A new Poincaré inequality and its application to the regularity of minimizers of integral functionals with nonstandard growth. Nonlinear Anal. 17(9), 833–839 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/0362-546X(91)90157-V. ISSN 0362-546X
Brézis, H., Wainger, S.: A note on limiting cases of Sobolev embeddings and convolution inequalities. Comm. Part. Differ. Equ. 5(7), 773–789 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1080/03605308008820154. ISSN 0360-5302
Brothers, J.E., Ziemer, W.P.: Minimal rearrangements of Sobolev functions. J. Reine Angew. Math. 384, 153–179 (1988). ISSN 0075-4102
Brudnyĭ, J.A.: Rational approximation and imbedding theorems. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 247(2), 269–272 (1979). ISSN 0002-3264
Cavaliere, P., Cianchi, A.: Classical and approximate Taylor expansions of weakly differentiable functions. Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Math. 39(2), 527–544 (2014). https://doi.org/10.5186/aasfm.2014.3933. ISSN 1239-629X
Chanillo, S., Wheeden, R.L.: Weighted Poincaré and Sobolev inequalities and estimates for weighted Peano maximal functions. Am. J. Math. 107(5), 1191–1226 (1985). https://doi.org/10.2307/2374351. ISSN 0002-9327
Cianchi, A.: A sharp embedding theorem for Orlicz-Sobolev spaces. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 45(1), 39–65 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1512/iumj.1996.45.1958. ISSN 0022-2518
Cianchi, A.: Optimal Orlicz-Sobolev embeddings. Rev. Mat. Iberoamericana 20(2), 427–474 (2004). https://doi.org/10.4171/RMI/396. ISSN 0213-2230
Cianchi, A., Pick, L.: Sobolev embeddings into BMO, VMO, and \(L_\infty \). Ark. Mat. 36(2), 317–340 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02384772. ISSN 0004-2080
Cianchi, A., Pick, L.: Optimal Gaussian Sobolev embeddings. J. Funct. Anal. 256(11), 3588–3642 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2009.03.001. ISSN 0022-1236
Cianchi, A., Edmunds, D.E., Gurka, P.: On weighted Poincaré inequalities. Math. Nachr. 180, 15–41 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1002/mana.3211800103. ISSN 0025-584X
Cianchi, A., Pick, L., Slavíková, L.: Higher-order Sobolev embeddings and isoperimetric inequalities. Adv. Math. 273, 568–650 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2014.12.027. ISSN 0001-8708
Cwikel, M., Pustylnik, E.: Weak type interpolation near “endpoint” spaces. J. Funct. Anal. 171(2), 235–277 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1006/jfan.1999.3502. ISSN 0022-1236
Donaldson, T.: Nonlinear elliptic boundary value problems in Orlicz-Sobolev spaces. J. Differ. Equ. 10, 507–528 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0396(71)90009-X. ISSN 0022-0396
Edmunds, D.E., Mihula, Z., Musil, V., Pick, L.: Boundedness of classical operators on rearrangement-invariant spaces. J. Funct. Anal. 278(4), 108341 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2019.108341. ISSN 0022-1236
Esposito, L., Ferone, V., Kawohl, B., Nitsch, C., Trombetti, C.: The longest shortest fence and sharp Poincaré-Sobolev inequalities. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 206(3), 821–851 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-012-0545-0. ISSN 0003-9527
Hajłasz, P., Koskela, P.: Sobolev met Poincaré. Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 145(688), x+101 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1090/memo/0688. ISSN 0065-9266
Hansson, K.: Imbedding theorems of Sobolev type in potential theory. Math. Scand. 45(1), 77–102 (1979). https://doi.org/10.7146/math.scand.a-11827. ISSN 0025-5521
Ho, K.-P.: Fourier integrals and Sobolev imbedding on rearrangement invariant quasi-Banach function spaces. Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Math. 41(2), 897–922 (2016). https://doi.org/10.5186/aasfm.2016.4157. ISSN 1239-629X
Hurri-Syrjänen, R.: Unbounded Poincaré domains. Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Ser. A I Math 17(2), 409–423 (1992). https://doi.org/10.5186/aasfm.1992.1725. ISSN 0066-1953
Jaye, B.J., Maz’ya, V.G., Verbitsky, I.E.: Quasilinear elliptic equations and weighted Sobolev-Poincaré inequalities with distributional weights. Adv. Math. 232, 513–542 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2012.09.029. ISSN 0001-8708
Kerman, R., Pick, L.: Optimal Sobolev imbeddings. Forum Math. 18(4), 535–570 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1515/FORUM.2006.028. ISSN 0933-7741
Kolyada, V.I.: Rearrangements of functions, and embedding theorems. Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 44((5(269))), 61–95 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1070/RM1989v044n05ABEH002287. ISSN 0042-1316
Krasnosel’skiĭ, M.A., Rutickiĭ, Ja.B.: Convex functions and Orlicz spaces. Translated from the first Russian edition by Leo F. Boron. P. Noordhoff Ltd., Groningen, (1961)
Malý, J., Ziemer, W.P.: Fine regularity of solutions of elliptic partial differential equations, volume 51 of Mathematical Surveys and Monographs. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, (1997). ISBN 0-8218-0335-2. 10.1090/surv/051
Maz’ya, V.G.: Sobolev spaces with applications to elliptic partial differential equations, volume 342 of Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences]. Springer, Heidelberg, augmented edition, (2011). ISBN 978-3-642-15563-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15564-2
Z. Mihula. Embeddings of homogeneous Sobolev spaces on the entire space. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A, First view:1–33, 2020. ISSN 0308-(2105). https://doi.org/10.1017/prm.2020.14
Musil, V.: Classical operators of harmonic analysis in Orlicz spaces. PhD thesis, Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, (2018). https://is.cuni.cz/webapps/zzp/detail/150069/
Musil, V.: Fractional maximal operator in Orlicz spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl., 474(1):94–115, (2019). ISSN 0022-247X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2019.01.034
O’Neil, R.: Convolution operators and \(L(p,\,q)\) spaces. Duke Math. J., 30:129–142, (1963). ISSN 0012-7094. 10.1215/S0012-7094-63-03015-1. http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.dmj/1077374532
Opic, B., Pick, L.: On generalized Lorentz-Zygmund spaces. Math. Inequal. Appl. 2(3), 391–467 (1999). https://doi.org/10.7153/mia-02-35. ISSN 1331-4343
Payne, L.E., Weinberger, H.F.: An optimal Poincaré inequality for convex domains. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 5, 286–292 (1960). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00252910. ISSN 0003-9527
Peetre, J.: Espaces d’interpolation et théorème de Soboleff. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble), 16(1):279–317, (1966). ISSN 0373-0956. URL http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIF_1966__16_1_279_0
Rabier, P.J.: Uniformly local spaces and refinements of the classical Sobolev embedding theorems. Ark. Mat. 56(2), 409–440 (2018). https://doi.org/10.4310/ARKIV.2018.v56.n2.a13. ISSN 0004-2080
Rao, M.M., Ren, Z.D.: Theory of Orlicz spaces, volume 146 of Monographs and Textbooks in Pure and Applied Mathematics. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, (1991). ISBN 0-8247-8478-2
Stein, E.M.: Editor’s note: the differentiability of functions in \({\bf R}^{n}\). Ann. of Math. (2), 113(2):383–385, 1981. ISSN 0003-486X. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/2006989
Talenti, G.: Inequalities in rearrangement invariant function spaces. In Nonlinear analysis, function spaces and applications, Vol. 5 (Prague, 1994), pages 177–230. Prometheus, Prague, (1994)
Tartar, L.: Imbedding theorems of Sobolev spaces into Lorentz spaces. Boll. Unione Mat. Ital. Sez. B Artic. Ric. Mat. (8) 1(3), 479–500 (1998). ISSN 0392-4041
Vuillermot, P.-A.: A class of Orlicz-Sobolev spaces with applications to variational problems involving nonlinear Hill’s equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 89(1), 327–349 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-247X(82)90105-6. ISSN 0022-247X
Zhang, Q.S.: Sobolev inequalities, heat kernels under Ricci flow, and the Poincaré conjecture. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2011). ISBN 978-1-4398-3459-6
Ziemer, W.P.: Weakly differentiable functions, volume 120 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, (1989). ISBN 0-387-97017-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1015-3. Sobolev spaces and functions of bounded variation
Zygmund, A.: Trigonometric series, vol. I, 2nd edn. II. Cambridge University Press, New York (1959)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This research was supported by the grant P201-18-00580S of the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic, by the grant SVV-2017-260455, and by Charles University Research program No. UNCE/SCI/023.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mihula, Z. Poincaré-Sobolev inequalities with rearrangement-invariant norms on the entire space. Math. Z. 298, 1623–1640 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00209-020-02652-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00209-020-02652-z
Keywords
- Optimal spaces
- Poincaré inequality
- Poincaré-Sobolev inequality
- Rearrangement-invariant spaces
- Sobolev spaces