Introduction

Salmonella Typhimurium (STM) is a Gram-negative intracellular bacterium with a wide range of host, which is widely distributed in the digestive tracts of livestock, birds and human (Fàbrega and Vila 2013; Majowicz et al. 2010). As one of important food-borne pathogens, STM can infect human through the contaminated meat, milk, eggs, and other animal-derived foods, resulting in human acute gastroenteritis, which has posed a serious threat to global food hygiene and safety. In the recent years, food poisoning caused by STM has occurred frequently in many countries, especially in the developing countries, causing serious harm to human health (Senior 2009).

Small RNA (sRNA) is non-coding RNA with about 50–400 nucleotides (nt) in length (Fröhlich and Vogel 2009). They are widely found in the genomes of many bacterial species (Harfouche et al. 2015). The currently available studies have found that sRNA is involved in regulation of the expression of certain genes of bacteria in adverse stress environments, and play an important role in responding to the environmental stresses, community effect, and the pathogenicity of bacteria(Fröhlich and Vogel 2009; Wagner and Romby 2015). A number of studies have confirmed that bacterial sRNA can perform a variety of biological functions by binding to mRNAs of their target genes to adapt to the environmental changes by regulating them at the post-transcriptional level (Papenfort and Vogel 2009).

Recently, more than 100 non-coding-sRNAs have been found and identified in Salmonella (Kröger et al. 2012). However, the biological functions of most of these sRNAs are not yet known. A few studies have revealed that the expression level of sRNA STnc1480 with 395 nucleotides in length was significantly increased during the infection process of STM into macrophages (Kröger et al. 2012; Srikumar et al. 2015). However, the regulatory roles of STnc1480 on the response of STM to environmental stress, biofilm (BF) formation, and pathogenicity of STM remain unclear. Therefore, the main purpose of this study was to understand the regulatory roles of STnc1480 on environmental stress, BF formation, and pathogenicity in STM. Here, we constructed and analyzed the response to environmental stresses, BF formation, and pathogenicity of the STnc1480 gene-deficient strain and complement strain, and identified the target genes regulated by sRNA STnc1480, aiming to provide new insights into the molecular mechanism of sRNA regulation in STM.

Materials and methods

Design of the primers

According to the STM SL1344 (accession number: FQ312003.1) sequence and pKD3 (AY048742.1) plasmid sequence deposited in the GeneBank, we designed the specific primers using Primer 5.0 software (Premier Inc., Canada), and synthesized by Beijing Genomics Institute (China). All the primers used in this study are listed in Table 1.

Table 1 Primers used in this study

Generation of STnc1480-deficient mutant strain and complement strains

The strains and plasmid used are listed in Table 2. STM Wild Type (WT) SL1344 strains were cultured with brain–heart immersion (BHI) broth (Hopebio, China) at 37 °C for 12–16 h. The gene sequence of STM STnc1480 was amplified with F1/R1 primers. The STnc1480-deficient mutant strain was constructed using λ-Red recombination technology (Datsenko and Wanner 2000). Briefly, chloramphenicillin-containing gene products were first amplified by PCR with F2/R2 primer pair, which were used to construct recombinant strain △: STnc1480:: cat. Then the STnc1480-deficient mutant strain was identified by PCR amplification with F1/R1 primer pair in combination with sequencing technology. The complement strain △STnc1480/STnc1480 was constructed using F3/R3 primer pair.

Table 2 Strains and plasmids used in this study

Environmental stresses assay

Briefly, the strains of SL1344, △STnc1480, and △STnc1480/STnc1480 were inoculated into 50 mL of BHI liquid medium, and cultured at 37 °C overnight; This was followed by inoculation of the bacteria on an LB agar plate overnight and observation of the individual colony sizes by continuous zoom microscopy. The bacterial optical density at 600 nm (OD600nm) value was adjusted to 0.5, the bacteria solution was inoculated at 1:100 ratio in the BHI liquid medium and cultured continuously at 37 °C, their OD600 values were measured every hour and their growth curves were plotted. At the same time and 37℃, the bacterial solutions were inoculated at a ratio of 1:100, respectively, to HCl-adjusted pH 4.8 BHI liquid medium, NaOH-adjusted pH 10 BHI liquid medium, and BHI liquid medium containing 2 M NaCl and 2 mM 30% H2O2. The OD600 values were measured every hour and their growth curves were plotted. The effects of STnc1480 gene deficiency on the responses of STM to different environmental stress conditions were examined and analyzed.

Biofilm formation assay

The overnight-cultured active bacterial solution was inoculated in 1:100 ratio into the BHI liquid medium and cultured up to its OD600nm of 0.2. Then 100 μL of bacteria solution was aspired and transferred to 96-well microplates. Each sample was divided into two groups and eight parallel repetitions were set for each group. BF of STM was measured according to methods reported in the literature (Kint et al. 2010). After being cultured for 22, 23, and 24 h, the differences in BF formation capability between SL1344, △STnc1480, and △STnc1480/STnc1480 strains were compared and the effects of STnc1480 gene deficiency on STM BF formation capacity were analyzed.

Cell adhesion, invasion, and intracellular survival assay

Briefly, mouse macrophages RAW264.7 were placed in culture incubator at 37 °C and 5% carbon dioxide (CO2) and cultured overnight to grow into a single layer with about 2 × 105 cells per well. The bacterial adhesion and invasion tests were performed according to the methods described in the literature with a slight modification (Ryan et al. 2018). After infection of 1 h, for the cell invasion test, the bacterial cells that did not enter the macrophages were killed with Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) (Gibco, USA) containing gentamicin [(100 mg/mL) (BIOTOPPED, China)] at 37 °C. The remaining steps were the same as those described above. The adhesion rates and invasion rates were calculated. Intracellular survival tests were conducted with reference to the literature (Hölzer et al. 2009). At 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 h after culture, cultured solution was aspired, cleaned, and lysed. The bacterial colonies were counted. The test was repeated three times and three parallels were set each time.

Animal infections

One hundred and fourteen 6-week-old BALB/c mice were randomly divided into one control group and six different dilution of bacterial  infection groups 2 × 102 cfu/mL, 2 × 103 cfu/mL, 2 × 104 cfu/mL, 2 × 105 cfu/mL, 2 × 106 cfu/mL, and 2 × 107 cfu/mL, respectively. STM SL1344, △STnc1480, and △STnc1480/STnc1480 strains were cultured in BHI liquid medium, respectively, and used to infect mice when the logarithmic phase OD600 was 0.58. The mice in each subgroup were intraperitoneally injected with 0.5 mL of serially diluted cultures and the control group was treated with the same volume of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and observed continuously for 10 days, and the LD50 of the mice was calculated by the modified Kurt method (Angalabiri-Owei and Isirima 2014). Six-week-old mice were infected with 2 × 104 cfu/ mL SL1344, △STnc1480, and △STnc1480/STnc1480 strains, respectively. Mice were sacrificed on days 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 after infection, and the amounts of bacteria in these organs were simultaneously measured (Kumawat et al. 2016). Meanwhile, the liver and spleen were collected and pathological tissue sections were prepared 5 days after injection and the histopathological changes were observed by optical microscopy (Olympus, Japan).

Prediction and screening of target genes regulated by STnc1480

TargetRNA2 online software was used to predict the target genes of STnc1480 (Kery et al. 2014). The STM SL1344 genome was selected and the STnc1480 RNA sequence was entered. The genes with longer bases being paired with STnc1480 were selected as the target genes.

RNA extraction and real-time quantitative PCR

Briefly, the bacteria were cultured to BF formation state, and then collected by centrifugation. Total RNA was extracted with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, USA). Then complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized using PrimeScript-RRT kit including gDNA Eraser (TaKaRa Bio, Inc., Japan). Briefly, using 16sF/16sR and lpfAF/lpfAR as primers, the transcription levels of the target genes were determined by real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) using the ABI7500 instrument (Applied Biosystems, USA). Using the 16sRNA gene as the reference gene, the relative transcription levels of the target genes were calculated by the 2−△△CT method (Livak and Schmittgen 2001). Each test was repeated three times.

The bacterial dual-plasmid reporting system experiment

The interaction between STnc1480 and its target genes was analyzed using the bacterial dual-plasmid reporter system. In brief, F4/R4 and F5/R5 primers were used to amplify the operon DNA sequences of STnc1480 and lpfA. Then the pUT18C-STnc1480 and pMR-LacZ-lpfA plasmids were constructed; the constructed recombinant plasmids were co-transfected into BTH101 E. coli competent cells via electroporation. The positive clones on a Kanr (100 mg/ mL) Ampr (100 mg/ 9 mL) (BIOTOPPED, China) double-resistant plate coated with X-gal (TaKaRa Bio, Inc., Japan) and isopropyl-beta-D-thiogalactopyranoside(IPTG) (Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd., China) were screened out and were placed at 37 °C overnight, and the color change of the bacterial lawn was observed.

Statistical analysis of data

GraphPad Prism 5.0 software (https://www.graphpad.com/, USA) was used for data analysis, and t test was used to conduct data significance analysis. The value of P < 0.05 was considered significantly different, while P < 0.01 was considered extremely significant different.

Results

STnc1480 does not affect the growth of STM in different environments

Through PCR and sequencing confirmation, the deletion strain △STnc1480 and the complement strain △STnc1480/STnc1480 were obtained (Supplementary Fig. S1 and Supplementary Fig. S2), respectively. The growth rates and bacterial single colony of the SL1344, △STnc1480, and △STnc1480/STnc1480 at 37 °C, were not significantly different (P > 0.05) (Fig. 1A) and Supplementary Fig. S4). When being cultured under the condition of pH4.8, pH10, 2 M NaCl, and 2 mM 30% H2O2, the growth of △STnc1480 was not significantly different from those of the complement strain and the parent strain (P > 0.05) (Fig. 1B, C, D and E), suggesting that STnc1480 does not affect the growth of STM in different environments.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Growth curves of SL1344, △STnc1480, and △STnc1480/STnc1480 strains under different conditions. A–E: Growth curves of SL1344, △STnc1480, and △STnc1480/STnc1480 strains at 37 °C, pH4.8, pH10, 2 M NaCl, 2 mM 30% H2O2, respectively. OD600 = optical density at 600 nm

STnc1480 affects biofilm formation of STM

Cultured for 22, 23, and 24 h, respectively, the SL1344, △STnc1480, and △STnc1480/STnc1480 were all capable of forming BF (Fig. 2A). However, the BF-forming ability of △STnc1480 strain was significantly weakened compared to the others at the indicated time (P < 0.05) (Fig. 2B), suggesting that STnc1480 had a potential influence on BF formation of STM.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Assay of biofilm formation ability of SL1344, △STnc1480, and △STnc1480/STnc1480 strain, respectively. A Biofilm observation by microscopic (40 × 10), B Biofilm forming abilities determined by OD600. Values represent the mean ± SEM (*P < 0.05) OD600 = optical density at 600 nm

STnc1480 affects adherence, invasion, and intracellular survival of STM to cells

Compared with those of SL1344 and △STnc1480/STnc1480, the adhesion of △STnc1480 to RAW264.7 cells was extremely significantly weakened (P < 0.01) (Fig. 3A), and the invasion ability was also significantly weakened (P < 0.05) (Fig. 3B). At 6, 8, 10, and 12 h after infection, the quantity of △STnc1480 strains was significantly lower than those of SL1344 and △STnc1480/STnc1480 strains (P < 0.01) (Fig. 3C and Supplementary Fig. S5), indicating that STnc1480 affects the intracellular survival of STM.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Determination of cellular adhesion, invasion, and survival abilities in the RAW264.7 cell line. A cellular adhesion rate, B cellular invasion rate, C intracellular survival abilities. Values represent the mean ± SEM (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01). CFU colony-forming unit

Deleting STnc1480 attenuates virulence of STM in mice

The LD50 of SL1344, △STnc1480, and △STnc1480/STnc1480 were 3.6 × 104 cfu/ mL, 4 × 105 cfu/ mL, and 8.5 × 104 cfu/ mL, respectively (Table 3). The survival curves indicated that the pathogenicity of △STnc1480 group was significantly reduced (Fig. 4C). On the 5th, 7th, and 9th days after infection, as compared with those of SL1344 and △STnc1480/STnc1480 groups, the bacterial loads of △STnc1480 group in the liver and spleen of mice were significantly lower (P < 0.01) (Fig. 4A, B). Compared with those of SL1344 and △STnc1480/STnc1480 groups, the histopathological damages in liver, spleen, and small intestine of the mice infected with the △STnc1480 were alleviated (Fig. 5).

Table 3 Determination of LD50 of SL1344, △STnc1480, and△STnc1480/STnc1480 in 6-week-old mice after intraperitoneal injection
Fig. 4
figure 4

Bacterial loads and survival curves in mice infected by SL1344, △STnc1480, and △STnc1480/STnc1480 strain, respectively. A Liver, B spleen, C survival curve. Values represent the mean ± SEM (**P < 0.01). CFU = colony-forming unit

Fig. 5
figure 5

Histopathological changes in liver, spleen, and intestine of mice inoculated by PBS, SL1344, △STnc1480, and△STnc1480/STnc1480 strains, respectively. (magnification, × 200, hematoxylin and eosin stain(HE) staining)

STnc1480 regulates lpfA expression

TargetRNA2 prediction of the target genes of STnc1480 led to the finding that the STnc1480 were complementarily paired with the 5'-UTR (− 52 to − 71 bases) of lpfA mRNA (Fig. 6A, B). In the state of BF formation, RT-qPCR analysis results showed that compared with SL1344 and △STnc1480/STnc1480, the transcription level of lpfA gene in △STnc1480 strain was significantly lower (P < 0.01) (Fig. 7), suggesting that the expression of lpfA gene may be regulated by the STnc1480.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Complementary pairing position of sRNA STnc1480 with mRNA of lpfA gene of STM. A The schematic represents the pairing region of STnc1480 sRNA with lpfA gene, B The − 35, − 10 region of lpfA gene promoter were underlined. The complementary sequences for STnc1480 targeting region are shown by black spots

Fig.7
figure 7

Determination of the transcription levels of lpfA gene in △STnc1480, △STnc1480/STnc1480, and SL1344 by RT-qPCR. Values represent the mean ± SEM (**P < 0.01)

STnc1480 can interact with target gene lpfA

The pMR-LacZ-lpfA and pUT18C-STnc1480 plasmids were constructed (Supplementary Fig. S3). Compared with the transformed pUT18C, pMR-LacZ and the co-transformed pUT18C and pMR-LacZ empty plasmids, the E. coli moss transformed with pUT18C-STnc1480 and pMR-LacZ-lpfA turned blue on the X-gal plate (Fig. 8), indicating that STnc1480 plays a positively regulatory role on the expression of lpfA gene.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Verification of interaction between STnc1480 and target gene lpfA using two plasmids co-expression system. A Bacterial lawn of BTH101 transformed by pUT18C, B bacterial lawn of BTH101 transformed by pMR-LacZ, C bacterial lawn of BTH101 co-transformed by pUT18C and pMR-LacZ, D bacterial lawn of BTH101 co-transformed by pUT18C-STnc1480 and pMR-LacZ-lpfA

Discussion

Many studies have shown that sRNA may regulate the expression of target genes in a variety of ways at the post-transcriptional levels. A large majority of sRNA regulatory factors block the entry of 30S ribosome by combining mRNA’s Shine–Dalgarno (SD) sequences or AUG start codon, thus preventing the start of translation. Alternatively, sRNA can also be paired with the target gene base to protect it from cell RNA degradation, thereby stabilizing the protein expression of the target gene (Bouvier et al. 2008; Opdyke et al. 2004). In addition, sRNA can be paired with the 5'-non-coding (UTR) regions of mRNA to open the secondary structures of the masking SD sequence and promote the binding of the SD sequence to the 30S ribosome, thus activating the expression of the target genes (Bobrovskyy and Vanderpool 2014).

In the recent years, many investigators have carried out research work on sRNAs of STM. To date, approximately 280 sRNAs expressed under various conditions have been detected in the STM LT2 strain (Kröger et al. 2013). Shabarinath et al. (Srikumar et al. 2015) found a significant increase in the expression level of 31 sRNAs through transcriptome studies of STM-infected mouse macrophages, while expression levels of some sRNAs were very low during extracellular growth, but were significantly higher in macrophages, suggesting that these sRNAs may be related to STM's pathogenicity and intracellular survival (Sittka et al. 2008).

It has been found that expression level of sRNA STnc1480 was significantly increased after STM-infected cells (Srikumar et al. 2015). However, the regulatory roles of STnc1480 and its target genes have not yet been studied. Here, we confirmed that the cell invasion ability and pathogenicity of the STnc1480-defficient strain were significantly reduced, suggesting that the STnc1480 was involved in regulation of pathogenicity in STM. Bioinformational predictions revealed that lpfA was one of the target genes regulated by STnc1480. It has been proved that lpfA was the main subunit of lpf fimbria, which helps STM form BF in the infected intestinal epithelia and increases ability of STM's intestinal colonization and pathogenicity to mice (Quan et al. 2019; Ledeboer et al. 2006). RT-qPCR analysis further confirmed that expression level of lpfA in the △STnc1480 was lower than that of SL1344, indicating that STnc1480 contributes to the expression regulation of lpfA gene, thus resulting in the reduced capacities of BF formation, cell invasion, and pathogenicity of STM.

To confirm the interaction between STnc1480 and 5’-UTR of lpfA mRNA, the bacterial dual-plasmid reporting system was employed in this study. By co-transformated the plasmid expressing sRNA and the plasmid containing their target mRNA-binding sites and the reporting gene, the effects of STnc1480 and lpfA on LacZ gene expression using X-gal as color agent were analyzed. The results revealed that STnc1480 could bind with the 5’UTR region of lpfA mRNA. Therefore, we speculated that the molecular mechanism of STnc1480 is to regulate the expression level of the lpfA gene by binding to mRNA of lpfA gene, protecting it from RNase degradation, and thus controlling the expression levels of the target genes, which posses similar regulatory mechanisms with the literature (Fröhlich et al. 2013).

In conclusion, this study revealed the regulatory roles of sRNA STnc1480 on BF formation and pathogenicity in STM, which provided new insights into the regulatory mechanism of sRNAs in STM.