Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis
The objective was to investigate the outcome of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms in women with urodynamic stress incontinence (USI) after transobturator sling procedures (TOTs).
Methods
We evaluated 109 consecutive patients with USI, who had undergone TOT in a tertiary hospital between 2012 and 2014. All patients received evaluations, including structured urogynecological questionnaires and pelvic organ prolapse quantification examination before, and 3 and 12 months after surgery. One-hour pad test and urodynamic testing were performed before and 3–6 months postoperatively. Patient demographics, lower urinary tract symptoms, and urodynamic results were analyzed between pure USI and USI with OAB symptoms.
Results
Persistent SUI occurred in 8 patients at 3 months (7.3 %) and 7 patients at 12 months (6.4 %) postoperatively. The most common OAB symptom was frequency (54.1 %), followed by urgency urinary incontinence (52.3 %), urinary urgency (42.2 %), and nocturia (33 %). Most of these OAB symptoms were resolved at the 3-month and 12-month follow-ups both in patients treated with TOT only and in those treated with TOT combined with other pelvic surgeries. There was no significant difference in the preoperative urodynamic changes between patients with pure USI and USI without OAB groups. However, postoperative urodynamic results showed a significant decrease in the maximal urethral closure pressure in the group of patients with USI and OAB symptoms, but no significant urodynamic changes in the group with pure USI.
Conclusions
Coexistent OAB symptoms are common in women who were diagnosed with USI and most of these symptoms may resolve 3 and 12 months after TOT.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms are common physical conditions that may have a negative impact on women’s quality of life [1, 2]. Many women with SUI often present with other lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), including frequency, nocturia, urgency, and/or urgency urinary incontinence (UUI), suggesting OAB [3, 4]. In fact, mixed urinary incontinence (MUI), SUI combined with UUI symptoms, has been reported to cause more discomfort than pure incontinence subtypes [5]. The prevalence of MUI among women suffering from urinary incontinence varies from 29 to 69 % [6]. Treatment of UUI and detrusor overactivity (DO) may involve drugs, behavioral therapy or biofeedback [7], but some investigators suggest that operative cure of SUI has a beneficial effect on UUI symptoms and DO [6, 8–18]. It has been reported that 50–74 % of patients with MUI are cured of UUI after anti-incontinence surgery [17, 18]. However, more than half of the patients with preoperative DO who underwent transobturator or retropubic mid-urethral sling cannot resolve their DO [16–18]. Presence of DO has been reported to be associated with a higher failure rate of UUI treatment after mid-urethral sling in patients with MUI [19]. Therefore, in the past decade, patients diagnosed with preoperative DO are routinely excluded from undergoing any type of mid-urethral sling in our institute.
Many mid-urethral sling procedures for relieving SUI have been introduced recently; the transobturator sling procedure (TOT) is performed frequently and has shown favorable clinical outcomes [20, 21]. Additionally, most studies on SUI focus on the cure of incontinence after mid-urethral slings rather than the effect of these procedures on coexistent LUTS. We hypothesize that TOT might resolve coexistent OAB symptoms postoperatively in women with SUI. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the outcome of LUTS among women who underwent TOT for urodynamic stress incontinence (USI) 3 months and 1 year after surgery.
Materials and methods
In this cohort study, we reviewed the medical records of consecutive patients with USI, who underwent TOT (Align Urethral Support Systems; Bard, Covington, GA, USA) at our institute, a tertiary hospital, between November 2012 and October 2014. We included all patients with USI who received the Align sling. None of the patients took anti-muscarinics to improve preoperative OAB symptoms before TOT was performed. Patients with urodynamic evidence of DO were excluded because of surgical exclusion guidelines, which have been implemented for many years in our institute. The ethics committee of our university hospital approved the study protocol (no. 104-1172B).
The preoperative evaluation included general and obstetric histories, a voiding diary, 1-h pad test, urinalysis and urine culture, pelvic examination utilizing the Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) Quantification System [22], and a full urodynamic evaluation. The urodynamic studies included provocative sitting water cystometry (at a filling rate of 50 ml/min), urethral profilometry at rest and with repeated coughing, and the bladder at maximum cystometric capacity in the sitting position. Upon entry and at the out-patient department, patients were interviewed using a structured urogynecological questionnaire regarding the presence of LUTS [23], in which LUTS was defined based on International Continence Society definitions [24]. The questionnaire included eight questions that described the symptoms of SUI, the frequency of micturition, nocturia, urgency, UUI, incomplete emptying, voiding difficulty, and straining. All answers to questions were in yes/no dichotomy. Other validated questionnaires, the short form of the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) and the short form of the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7), were also completed at the same time to assess the effect of surgery on urinary incontinence.
Either regional or general anesthesia was used according to patients’ and surgeons’ preferences. All patients with USI underwent the Align procedure, using a tunneler from outside the entrance point to adjust the tape without tension. The Align anti-incontinence system comprises halo introducers and a polypropylene mesh sling implant encased in a protective sheath with green guide tubes at each end. Connectors designed to attach to the tip portion of the introducer needles are attached to the distal ends of the guide tubes. Patients in the combined pelvic surgery group received TOT and additional pelvic reconstructive surgeries for the treatment of USI and POP. Additional surgical procedures for prolapse repair included vaginal hysterectomy, anterior and/or posterior colporrhaphy, sacrospinous suspension, and transvaginal mesh procedure.
The Foley catheter was removed within 24 h after surgery. Patients were discharged once they were able to void spontaneously, with residual urine less than 20 % of the self-voiding volume. They then underwent postoperative follow-up at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery. Urodynamic studies were performed at 3–6 months after surgery to detect the objective postoperative continence rate. The same questionnaires were conducted 12 months after surgery.
A diagnosis of pure USI was made if the patient exhibited symptoms of SUI, observable leakage with stress, no simultaneous detrusor activity when undergoing cystometry and urethral profilometry studies; the diagnosis of postoperative SUI was established if the patient lost urine on coughing, sneezing, or physical exertion after surgery. Patients who had complaints of involuntary loss of urine associated with urgency were considered to have UUI. MUI was defined as involuntary loss of urine associated with urgency and also with effort or physical exertion or upon sneezing or coughing. Unless otherwise stated, the terminology used in this article conforms to the recommendations of the International Continence Society and International Urogynecological Association [25].
Statistical analysis was completed using SPSS version 20. Fisher’s exact test was used to assess categorical data, and Student’s t test was applied to evaluate continuous variables. To compare preoperative and postoperative responses to individual questions, a generalized McNemar’s test was performed. A p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
A total of 109 patients (77 with and 32 without OAB symptoms) met the criteria and were included for analysis. UDI-6 and IIQ-7 scores were significantly increased in OAB group before surgery (p = 0.001), compared with non-OAB group (Table 1). Seventy patients received TOT only and 39 patients underwent TOT combined with pelvic surgeries. Additional pelvic reconstructive procedures in the combined pelvic surgery group included sacrospinous ligament suspension in 5 patients, transvaginal mesh in 11 patients, vaginal hysterectomy in 15 patients, anterior colporrhaphy in 22 patients and posterior colporrhaphy in 21 patients.
In Table 2, the most common coexistent OAB symptom was frequency (54.1 %), followed by UUI (52.3 %), urinary urgency (42.2 %), and nocturia (33 %). Postoperative SUI was found in 8 (7.3 %) and 7 (6.4 %) patients at 3 months and 12 months respectively. The prevalence of postoperative OAB symptoms declined to 13 % in urgency, 12.3 % in UUI, 18.6 % in frequency, and 30.6 % in nocturia at the 12-month follow-up. Both UDI-6 and IIQ-7 scores were significantly improved postoperatively. The prevalence of frequency and nocturia were higher in the combined pelvic surgery group than in the TOT only group at 3 months after surgery, but most of the OAB symptoms had resolved by the 12-month follow-up regardless of operating methods (Tables 2, 3). Four patients with postoperative OAB symptoms (2 persistent UUI and 2 de novo UUI) received anti-muscarinic drugs for 4 months at the 3-month follow-up, which improved their urological problems thereafter. The de novo LUTS at the 12-month follow-up included urgency in 4 (3.7 %), UUI in 4 (3.7 %), frequency in 3 (2.8 %), and nocturia in 4 (3.7 %). All these patients improved their OAB symptoms after a 4-month anti-muscarinic treatment.
Eighty-two patients (56 patients with USI and OAB, and 26 patients with pure USI) received postoperative urodynamic testing. The remaining 27 patients noted improvement of incontinence after TOT and refused to receive postoperative urodynamic examination. There was no significant difference in urodynamic changes between the pure USI group and the group of patients with USI and OAB symptoms (Table 4). With subsequent analyses, however, postoperative urodynamic results showed a significant decrease in the maximal urethral closure pressure (MUCP) in the group with USI and OAB symptoms (Table 5), but no significant urodynamic changes in the pure USI group (Table 6).
Discussion
Our results showed an overall cure rate of 93 % for SUI after TOT, which is compatible with previously reported results [20, 21], and confirmed that TOT is effective in correcting the SUI component in patients with MUI [8]. Some reports indicated a substantial resolution of OAB symptoms in women with MUI after anti-incontinence surgeries, but with lower cure rates than for pure SUI [8, 12, 26]. A meta-analysis study revealed that the overall cure rates of urgency and UUI symptoms were 30 to 85 % after mid-urethral slings [8]. TOT was demonstrated to have the highest resolution of preoperative DO and UUI among mid-urethral slings, including TOT, tension-free vaginal tape (TVT), and suprapubic arch sling [10, 16, 17]. In addition, the presence of preoperative DO and concomitant pelvic surgeries showed a wide range of variation in the cure rate of OAB symptoms in women with MUI.
The treatment of OAB with DO can involve anticholinergic medications, behavioral therapy or biofeedback [7], but the role of surgery for MUI with DO on urodynamics is still controversial. The prevalence of DO in patients with MUI varies from 29.4 % to 67.6 % [16–18]. The presence of preoperative DO in patients with USI receiving mid-urethral slings, TVT or TOT, has been reported to be an independent risk factor for persistent urgency or UUI [10, 16–18]. Choe et al. [18] separated 549 patients with SUI receiving TVT into patients with and without DO, and reported that the group with DO had a significantly higher resolution rate than the group without DO with regard to OAB symptoms (37 % vs 18 %). Another study on MUI and OAB symptoms reported by Gamble et al. [17] described the resolution of preoperative DO in 31.5 % of patients and the resolution of preoperative UUI in 56 % after the application of mid-urethral slings. Because many patients who suffer from MUI symptoms do not demonstrate DO on urodynamics, this may complicate the relationship between OAB symptoms and DO [7]. Therefore, some authors suggest that SUI patients with significant symptoms and signs of DO are not suitable for mid-urethral slings [11]. In the current study, the women were assessed preoperatively with urodynamic testing, and those with DO were excluded because of surgical exclusion guidelines in our institute. Preoperatively, 33–53 % of patients complained of UUI and other OAB symptoms, but most of the coexistent OAB symptoms resolved 3 months after TOT surgery. We found the rates of postoperative urgency, UUI, frequency, and nocturia at 12 months following TOT to be 12–31 %, which is concordant with previous reports [8–10]. To date, studies that reveal the surgical result of MUI without DO after mid-urethral sling have rarely been published [11]. The results of this study may provide physicians with a valuable reference in the treatment of urinary incontinence.
Some women with MUI along with advanced POP or uterine diseases required prolapse repair or hysterectomy. Under these circumstances, it might be worthwhile performing a concomitant anti-incontinence procedure for SUI, even with less than 50 % improvement in DO and UUI symptoms. Women with POP often present with SUI and a variety of LUTS [27], but only a few studies have been conducted to investigate the effect of concomitant pelvic reconstructive surgery on persistent SUI and OAB symptoms in women with MUI undergoing anti-incontinence surgery [8, 10]. A prospective cohort study demonstrated that concomitant prolapse surgery and use of TOT feasibly decrease the risks of persistent urgency and UUI in patients with MUI [10]. It is conceivable that apical and anterior vaginal wall prolapse might distort the bladder base or cause outlet obstruction and thereby induce OAB symptoms, which are likely corrected by concomitant pelvic surgeries [10]. Our results showed no significant difference in the prevalence of postoperative SUI and other LUTS between patients who had undergone TOT only and those who had undergone TOT combined with pelvic reconstructive surgery. Persistent symptoms of MUI were present in 12–31 % of women at 12 months after TOT.
There are still limitations to the use of preoperative urodynamic parameters for predicting the outcomes of mid-urethral sling in women with MUI [9]. In the present study, there was no significant difference in preoperative urodynamic changes between patients with pure USI and MUI. However, postoperative urodynamic results showed a significant decrease in the MUCP in the MUI group after TOT operation. Sun et al. [28] compared preoperative and postoperative urodynamic changes in 42 patients undergoing an TVT-obturator, an inside–out TOT, and found a significant decrease in the MUCP after surgery. Lower MUCP after TOT may be due to tissue dissections resulting in the disruption of the peri-urethral supportive tissue. A cohort study demonstrated that anti-incontinence surgery is a risk factor for lower MUCP in women with MUI [29].
The limitations of this study include its retrospective nature, a relatively small sample size, a lack of a more objective tool to demonstrate the anatomical change, and that the findings in Asian women may not be generalizable to other groups such as Caucasians and African–Americans. In addition, we did not use a bladder diary to investigate patients’ urological problems. Our data showed 11 patients who had UUI, but did not experience urgency before the operation. It is possible that some patients did not fully comprehend the meaning of UUI when they answered a yes/no question regarding LUTS. Furthermore, postoperative urodynamic studies in our patients were not performed at 12 months after continence surgery, which may have provided more information regarding urodynamic changes. However, Black et al. [30] advocated that outcomes need to be assessed only once and at any time 3 to 12 months after continence surgery because of the stability of the outcome measures over the first postoperative year. They conducted a longitudinal study to determine the effect of timing on the assessment of outcome in 442 women undergoing surgery for SUI and came to the above conclusion [30]. In our institute, it is routine to arrange urodynamic studies 3–6 months after continence surgery to detect the objective postoperative continence rate in the past decade. It is essential to conduct a longer urodynamic study to demonstrate the objective success rate of anti-incontinence surgery in the near future. Its strengths include urodynamic testing performed in a single laboratory, with operations performed by the primary surgeons using the same synthetic tape and techniques, and the assessment of patient-reported urological symptoms with validated, structured questionnaires.
In conclusion, our results show that the use of TOT to correct USI has favorable clinical outcomes. Coexistent OAB symptoms are common in women who were diagnosed with USI and most of these symptoms resolve after anti-incontinence surgery.
Abbreviations
- DO:
-
Detrusor overactivity
- IIQ-7:
-
The short form of the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire
- LUTS:
-
Lower urinary tract symptoms
- MUCP:
-
Maximal urethral closure pressure
- MUI:
-
Mixed urinary incontinence
- OAB:
-
Overactive bladder
- POP:
-
Pelvic organ prolapse
- SUI:
-
Stress urinary incontinence
- TOT:
-
Transobturator sling procedure
- TVT:
-
Tension-free vaginal tape
- UDI-6:
-
The short form of the Urogenital Distress Inventory
- USI:
-
Urodynamic stress incontinence
- UUI:
-
Urgency urinary incontinence
References
Dooley Y, Kenton K, Cao G, et al. Urinary incontinence prevalence: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Urol. 2008;179(2):656–61.
Wang Y, Xu K, Hu H, et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and impact on health related quality of life of overactive bladder in China. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011;30(8):1448–55.
Teleman PM, Lidfeldt J, Nerbrand C, Samsioe G, Mattiasson A. WHILA study group. Overactive bladder: prevalence, risk factors and relation to stress incontinence in middle-aged women. BJOG. 2004;111(6):600–4.
Tang DH, Colayco DC, Khalaf KM, Piercy J, et al. Impact of urinary incontinence on healthcare resource utilization, health-related quality of life and productivity in patients with overactive bladder. BJU Int. 2014;113(3):484–91.
Dooley Y, Lowenstein L, Kenton K, FitzGerald M, Brubaker L. Mixed incontinence is more bothersome than pure incontinence subtypes. Int Urogynecol J. 2008;19(10):1359–62.
Athanasiou S, Grigoriadis T, Giannoulis G, Protopapas A, Antsaklis A. Midurethral slings for women with urodynamic mixed incontinence: what to expect? Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(3):393–9.
McGuire EJ. Mixed symptomatology. BJU Int. 2000;85 (Suppl 3):47–56.
Jain P, Jirschele K, Botros SM, Latthe PM. Effectiveness of midurethral slings in mixed urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(8):923–32.
Katsumi HK, Rutman MP. Can we predict if overactive bladder symptoms will resolve after sling surgery in women with mixed urinary incontinence? Curr Urol Rep. 2010;11(5):328–37.
Lee JK, Dwyer PL, Rosamilia A, Lim YN, Polyakov A, Stav K. Persistence of urgency and urge urinary incontinence in women with mixed urinary symptoms after midurethral slings: a multivariate analysis. BJOG. 2011;118(7):798–805.
Rezapour M, Ulmsten U. Tension-Free vaginal tape (TVT) in women with mixed urinary incontinence--a long-term follow-up. Int Urogynecol J. 2001;12 (Suppl 2):S15–18.
Tahseen S, Reid P. Effect of transobturator tape on overactive bladder symptoms and urge urinary incontinence in women with mixed urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113(3):617–23.
Abdel-Fattah M, Hopper LR, Mostafa A. Evaluation of transobturator tension-free vaginal tapes in the surgical management of mixed urinary incontinence: 3-year outcomes of a randomized controlled trial. J Urol. 2014;191(1):114–9.
Sinha D, Blackwell A, Moran PA. Outcome measures after TVT for mixed urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2008;19(7):927–31.
Duckett JR, Basu M. TVT vs TOT: a case controlled study in patients with mixed urodynamic stress incontinence and detrusor overactivity. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(7):763–6.
Botros SM, Miller JJ, Goldberg RP, et al. Detrusor overactivity and urge urinary incontinence following transobturator versus midurethral slings. Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26(1):42–5.
Gamble TL, Botros SM, Beaumont JL, et al. Predictors of persistent detrusor overactivity after transvaginal sling procedures. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(6):696.e1–7.
Choe JH, Choo MS, Lee KS. The impact of tension-free vaginal tape on overactive bladder symptoms in women with stress urinary incontinence: significance of detrusor overactivity. J Urol. 2008;179(1):214–9.
Paick JS, Oh SJ, Kim SW, Ku JH. Tension-free vaginal tape, suprapubic arc sling, and transobturator tape in the treatment of mixed urinary incontinence in women. Int Urogynecol J. 2008;19(1):123–9.
Tommaselli GA, Di Carlo C, Formisano C, Fabozzi A, Nappi C. Medium-term and long-term outcomes following placement of midurethral slings for stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(9):1253–68.
Chun JY, Song M, Yoo DS, Han JY, Hong B, Choo MS. A comparative study of outside-in and inside-out transobturator tape procedures for female stress urinary incontinence: 7-year outcomes. Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2014;6(3):145–50.
Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(1):10–7.
Liang CC, Tseng LH, Horng SG, Lin IW, Chang SD. Correlation of pelvic organ prolapse quantification system scores with obstetric parameters and lower urinary tract symptoms in primiparae postpartum. Int Urogynecol J. 2007;18(5):537–41.
Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, et al. The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardization Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21(2):167–78.
Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(1):5–26.
Ankardal M, Heiwall B, Lausten-Thomsen N, Carnelid J, Milsom I. Short- and long-term results of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure in the treatment of female urinary incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(8):986–92.
Ellerkmann RM, Cundiff WC, Melick CF, Nihira MA, Leffler K, Bent AE. Correlation of symptoms with location and severity of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185(6):1332–8.
Sun MJ, Sun R, Li YI. A comparative study of a single-incision sling and a transobturator sling: clinical efficacy and urodynamic changes. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(5):823–9.
Kapoor DS, Housami F, White P, Swithinbank L, Drake M. Maximum urethral closure pressure in women: normative data and evaluation as a diagnostic test. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(11):1613–8.
Black NA, Bowling A, Griffith JM, Pope C, Abel PD. Impact of surgery for stress incontinence on the social lives of women. BJOG. 1998;105:605–12.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
None.
Additional information
Ching-Chung Liang and Wu-Chiao Hsieh contributed equally to this work
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liang, CC., Hsieh, WC. & Huang, L. Outcome of coexistent overactive bladder symptoms in women with urodynamic urinary incontinence following anti-incontinence surgery. Int Urogynecol J 28, 605–611 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3153-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3153-y