1 Introduction

Additive manufacturing (AM) applies specific methods to build materials and uses energy sources to connect processed materials to form 3D parts [1, 2] layer by layer [3], leading to on-demand manufacturing with the least post-processing, smaller operating footprint, and maximum material utilization [4], providing a novel approach to integrate the manufacturing of macro and micro structure parts [5, 6].

Recently, the metal AM has emerged as a significant issue [7, 8], but most mature AM of metal applies high-energy beams as heat to melt metal powder or wire to construct components [9, 10], of which laser is widely used [11], leading to high energy consumption and cost, with residual internal stress. Hence, the electrochemical additive manufacturing (ECAM) stands out which can form 3D entities of any shape, ultimately to realize the directional deposition of metals [12] with the following advantages: extensive range of the processed material (zinc [13], copper [14], nickel, gold, silver, cobalt [15], alloys [16], conductive polymer [17], etc.), low cost and operating environment requirements, and benign coordination of organization, morphology, and performance.

With the increasing commercial applications of AM, there is an urgent demand for printing multi-materials in a single component [18], leading to an emerging research on multi-material additive manufacturing (MMAM) [19]. Compared with general methods, MMAM brings a higher level of design freedom [20]. The AM of polymetallic materials is mainly based on laser source with defects such as pores, cracks, and delamination at interface.

Whereas processing bimetal parts with ECAM requires no high-temperature heat, without residual thermal stresses and defects [21], depicting an expanse prospect in the development and application of preparing multi-element metal parts.

Herein, a novel AM method associated with electrochemical deposition was adopted. Firstly, local conductive samples were prepared as substrate with polylactic acid (PLA) and carbon nanotube wires (CNTs), further to selectively deposit metal parts, and prepare copper-nickel multi-layer samples, for realizing the ECAM of metals and multi-metals, which proved the feasibility of multi-metal parts processing by ECAM. On account of the different thermal expansion coefficients of heterogeneous metals, the 4D printing effect of copper-nickel bimetallic samples was preliminarily explored, as well the viability of preparing energy storage elements by selective electrochemical deposition was demonstrated.

2 Experimental and methods

First, the filament preparation was performed with PLA powder (100 mesh, Nature Works, USA) and industrial CNT powder (TN1M1, Chengdu Organic Chemistry Co., Ltd., Chinese Academy of Sciences, China). A dual-nozzle 3D printer (P3, Polar bear, China) was used to prepare local conductive plastic samples. Figure 1c displays the local conductive plastic samples prepared by the dual-nozzle 3D printer, the black area in the part is conductive, composed of polylactic acid-carbon nanotube composite material (PLA-CNTs7wt%). While the white part is insulating, consisting of thermoplastic PLA. Before deposition, the copper plates and local conductive plastic samples were pretreated by rust removal, oil removal, and distilled water cleaning. Later, a local conductive plastic sample was deposited in electrolyte, taking the copper plate as anode and the local conductive sample as cathode. Then, a sample with metal deposited on the surface of the conductive region was obtained.

Fig. 1
figure 1

a Schematic diagram of preparation process of bimetal sample. b Model design of bimetal sheet. c Local conductive plastic sample. d As-deposited bimetal sheet (the nickel side is up)

The preparation of bimetallic parts is shown in Fig. 1a. Firstly, local conductive plastic sample 1 was deposited with copper in electrolyte A (100 g/L CuSO4·5H2O, 5 vol% H2SO4, and 200 mg/L PEG) (step 1), then electrodeposited with nickel in electrolyte B (100 g/L NiSO4·6H2O and 25 g/L H3BO3) (step 2). After, the sample was removed, cleaned with distilled water, and dried, then the obtained bimetal sample 1 was for standby. Local conductive plastic sample 2 was obtained by repeating step 1 and step 2 for two times to get four-layer metal sample 2 for standby. Besides, the binding of metal interfaces was observed under metal microscope and scanning electron microscope.

As shown in Fig. 1b, the design of bimetal sample is composed of copper and nickel. Figure 1c depicts the local conductive plastic sample. Subsequently, put the sample in electrolyte A for depositing 6 h on 20 mA. After cleaning and drying, the sample was placed in electrolyte B for depositing 6 h on 15 mA. Later, the sample was taken out, cleaned with distilled water, dried, and heated in oven until the plastic softens, and then the metal part was removed from plastic substrate to obtain the bimetallic sheet parts as shown in Fig. 1d. Finally, heated the bimetallic sheet sample with alcohol lamp and observe its deformation.

To demonstrate the electrical properties of electronic components fabricated through selective electrochemical deposition, a 3D spiral coil and interdigitated battery were designed and fabricated.

3 Results and discussion

The prepared plastic sample, as shown in Fig. 2a, was put into the electrolyte A; the spiral coil after electrodeposition is shown in Fig. 2b. Using an impedance analyzer to measure the inductance and impedance of spiral coils. And the magnetic field generated by the solenoid was measured by a gauss meter at different current intensities.

Fig. 2
figure 2

a Plastic spiral coil prepared by 3D printer. b As-deposited Cu spiral coil. c Plastic interdigitated battery prepared by 3D printer. d Interdigitated battery after electrodeposition of copper and zinc. e Discharge process of interdigitated battery

Then prepared a plastic interdigitated battery sample as shown in Fig. 2c. Connect the end of A to anode of the power supply, and the phosphor copper plate to cathode. Subsequently, the sample was electrodeposited in 200 ml electrolyte (20 g CuSO4·5H2O, 10 ml H2SO4, and 40 mg PEG) for 6 h at 30 mA, washed in distilled water to remove residual electrolyte. Afterward, connect the end of B in the sample to the anode of the power and cathode to zinc. Electrodeposited the sample in 200 mL electrolyte (60 g ZnSO4·7H2O, 6 g H3BO3) for 6 h at 30 mA. After cleaning, the sample as shown in Fig. 2d was obtained.

After the ends A and B of the sample are connected to the wire and the voltmeter (range 1 V), the sample is placed in 10 vol% sulfuric acid, and the deflection of the voltmeter is observed. When putting the sample into sulfuric acid, the pointer of voltmeter is deflected, and stable at about 0.4 V as shown in Fig. 2e. Zinc on the sample reacts with the sulfuric acid, so the plastic substrate is exposed, the electrons lost by zinc atoms flow to copper through the wire, and zinc atoms are oxidized to zinc ions; meanwhile, hydrogen escapes from the copper surface, hydrogen ions get electrons and reduce to hydrogen, and electrons are transferred from B to A, thus the current is from A to B. The prepared copper-zinc battery can generate a voltage of 0.4 V, demonstrating the outstanding ability of energy storage elements with excellent electrical communication, and computer technology. The selective electrochemical deposition additive manufacturing is simple in operation, low in cost, and saves complex installations and molds, and has huge advantages in micro-scale electronic components. Local conductive plastic samples after depositing copper in electrolyte (100 g/L CuSO4•5H2O) were shown in Fig. 3a, in which copper was well deposited in the conductive area of square, cross, and strip samples respectively.

Fig. 3
figure 3

a Variform local conductive plastic samples and selective electrochemical deposition samples. b The photograph of metal samples under different deposition time. c Diagram of sample quality variation over deposition time

Moreover, the deposition is uniform and even micron scale electronic circuits play a crucial role in the network without obvious defects, fully proving the feasibility of selective electrochemical deposition of metal on the local conductive substrate.

As shown in Fig. 3b, the copper sheets all hold intact square shape and uniform deposition overall. Afterwards, the micro morphology of the upper surface on metal sheet was observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM, JSM-IT500A, JEOL, Japan) as shown in Fig. 4a–e. With the gradual increase of deposition time from 2, 4, 6, 8 to 10 h, the grain size of copper rises, corresponding to the aggravated surface roughness. Among them, the metal sheet for 2 h shows the smoothest surface morphology without uneven bulge and particle defects and exhibits uniform grain size in the SEM image of its upper surface.

Fig. 4
figure 4

The influence of different deposition time on surface morphology of upper surface of samples (a 2 h, b 4 h, c 6 h, d 8 h, e 10 h at same current 20 mA)

According to Fig. 3c, with the deposition time lengthening, the mass of the samples gradually rises in linear relation, indicating the current efficiency remains in a relatively stable state during the increasing deposition time. It demonstrates, as the deposition time increases, preparing the metal parts by the selective electrochemical deposition can achieve the relatively stable current efficiency and obtain the roughly steady quality of the metal per unit.

The complex 3D metal components, helical line, and hollow sphere prepared are shown in Fig. 5a and b. The resulting black material on the surface of the 3D metal parts corresponds to carbonized PLA and residual CNTs.

Fig. 5
figure 5

a Preparation procedure of helical line. b Preparation procedure of hollow sphere. c 4D deformation process of bimetallic samples. d Schematic diagram of programmable samples. e The array-type ECAM samples under different deposition current (e 30 mA, f 40 mA, g 50 mA, h 60 mA)

When heating the bimetal sheet sample by an alcohol lamp, with the extended time, the sample gradually bent to the side of nickel, and the deflection angle increased likewise. When returning to room temperature, the sample generally returned to the original shape, as shown in Fig. 5c.

Owing to the greater linear expansion coefficient of copper than nickel, when heated equally, the thermal deformation length of copper is greater than nickel; hence, the sample will deflect to the side of the nickel. When returned to room temperature, the thermal expansion part of copper and nickel will shrink, namely, the sample will roughly return to its original shape.

When a layer of copper with identical thickness is deposited on the other side of nickel, the thermal deformation of copper on both sides will cancel when heated, and the sample will not be bent in this area, so the sample can be programmed and designed. According to the design intent, the specific area of the sample can be processed into a three-layer structure of copper-nickel-copper or nickel-copper-nickel, while the other parts have a double-layer structure of copper-nickel, as shown in Fig. 5d. During heating the sample, a specific area will bend, while other areas will remain in their original state. It is also possible to adjust the distribution direction of copper and nickel in each double-layer metal area to regulate the bending direction of the sample.

As shown in Fig. 5e–h, there appeared defects in the four deposition areas of sample e that no metal was deposited at 30 mA, indicating too less copper was produced to fully cover the deposition areas. Whereas the deposition in two areas on the left of sample f was uniform without defects at 40 mA, there existed more obvious defects in two areas on the right. Further increasing the current to 50 mA, there showed only a few defects in the upper right area of the sample g, demonstrating the further increased quality of deposition. When tuning to 60 mA, no defects occurred in sample h, exhibiting the highest deposition quality and complete coverage in the equal deposition areas. In addition, the grain size of deposited copper remains uniform roughly under the four current intensities, illustrating the increased current intensity did not obviously change the morphology of the metal layer, and can also enhance the deposition quality through elevating current intensity. Therefore, if the array structure sample has enough deposition area and appropriate current intensity, it can simply realize the large-scale production of metal electrochemical additive manufacturing.

The edge section of bimetal sheet 1 and four-layer metal sheet 2 was ground with sandpaper, then observed the cross-sectional morphology by metallurgical microscope. Through Fig. 6a and c, the copper layer and nickel layer were well combined with no gaps between layers. Subsequently, cut the sheet 1 and sheet 2 in the middle, and observe the cross-section of the middle part of the sheets. In view of Fig. 6b and d, the thickness of the middle is slightly smaller than the edge; the copper layer and nickel layer combine tightly in the middle with no cracks.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Metallurgical microscope image of samples. a Cross-section morphology of bimetal sample. b Fracture morphology of bimetal sample. c Cross-section morphology of four-layer metal sample. d Fracture morphology of four-layer metal sample. e SEM image for the fracture surface of bimetal sheet 1. f SEM image for the fracture surface of four-layer metal sheet 2

The fracture morphology of sheets 1 and 2 is legible to observe, and the thickness of each layer was roughly measured. Figure 6e shows the upper metal of sheet 1 is nickel with a thickness of about 112.0 μm and the lower metal is copper with a thickness of about 98.54 μm. In addition, the morphology of the fracture surface of sheet 2 is shown in Fig. 6f, wherein layers are nickel, copper, nickel, and copper from top to bottom, and the thickness is 79.91, 88.09, 50.78, and 76.67 μm separately. In addition, the bimetallic strip has a compact metal structure and its layers are closely bonded, which fully proves the superiority of this method in preparing multi-metal parts.

4 Conclusions

In this paper, we applied CNTs as conductive particles to fill the PLA matrix to prepare composite filaments and adopted the fused deposition 3D printer with dual nozzle to obtain local conductive samples. Later, the samples were deposited layer by layer through selective electrochemical deposition to realize the 3D forming of metal and multi-metal, and a method for separating the formed metal from the plastic substrate was proposed. Additionally, the effect of deposition time on the surface morphology and quality of the sample was explored. With the extension of deposition time, the grain size on the surface and the quality of the sample increases, as well the rate of deposition shows relatively stable wholly. In addition, the concept of preparing metal parts in an array and amplifying current density improves the deposition quality and coverage area. It accelerates the speed of processing and exhibits a handy approach for additive manufacturing to achieve mass production. At the same time, the prepared multi-metal parts are closely combined between different metal layers and 4D printing performance of the parts was studied. In consequence, the 4D printing function can be applied to relays, switches, controllers, etc. In conclusion, designing the two metal arrangement positions in the sample and adjusting the distribution direction of each bimetal area, thereby adjusting the bending direction, provides the possibility to create a more intelligent structure and sensor. The prepared copper-zinc battery can generate a voltage of 0.4 V, providing a basis for novel fabrication in the field of microelectronics.