Abstract
The complex nature of single organ failure potentially leading to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) in critically ill patients necessitates integrated supportive therapy. Rather than a primary disease, acute kidney injury (AKI) is considered a window to a potentially serious underlying systemic disease, which may partially explain the high morbidity and mortality rates associated with the condition. Renal replacement therapy (RRT) has been routinely used for more than a decade in various intensive care settings and there has also been an increase in the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal. When these renal and cardiopulmonary modalities are used together, a multidisciplinary approach is necessary to minimize negative interactions and unwanted adverse effects. In this review, we describe the patterns of organ crosstalk between the native and artificial organs, the incidence of AKI and need for RRT and associated mortality after extracorporeal organ support (ECOS) therapy, including the potential short- and long-term advantages and disadvantages of organ support in terms of renal function. We also review potential indications of RRT outside its conventional indications in patients with MODS, as well as technical considerations when RRT is used alongside other organ support therapies. Overall, available literature has not definitely established the ideal timing of these interventions, and whether early implementation impacts organ recovery and optimizes resource utilization is still a matter of open debate: it is possible that future research will be devoted to identify patient groups that may benefit from short- and long-term multiple organ support.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
The review is a state-of-knowledge perception of multiple organ failure and multiple organ support using the kidney and RRT as examples. |
From single to multiple organ failure and from single to multiple organ support
Evidence is growing that multiple organs are similarly and simultaneously involved in critical illness, with similar rates of organ dysfunction for the renal, cardiovascular, respiratory and central nervous systems [1]. This is because syndromes like sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) often have a significant impact on several distal organs, regardless of the site of the initial insult. Furthermore, impaired function of one organ is often related to the dysfunction of other organs. The literature on such complex clinical pictures emphasizes the need for multidisciplinary management with the engagement of the intensive care unit (ICU) physician with focus on multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) [2,3,4,5,6,7].
A typical example is acute kidney injury (AKI) which has been recognized as a heterogeneous clinical syndrome with multifactorial aetiology and variable clinical course [8]. Over 50% of patients develop stage 1 AKI at some point during their ICU course, while the incidences of stage 2 and 3 AKI are considerably less, and requirement for renal replacement therapy (RRT) is approximately 10% [9]. AKI can be the cause of further organ dysfunction. Conversely, AKI might be considered to be a secondary “bystander”, particularly in the setting of chronic conditions and multiple pre-existing comorbidities. Regardless of whether the kidneys are the initiating cause or are secondarily involved in distal organ dysfunction, their dysfunction has been shown to be independently associated with mortality. Indeed, much of the mortality risk in patients with MODS is thought to be the consequence of complex interactions between the actual insult, the activation of inflammation and distant organ effects. The severity of organ dysfunction is independently associated with mortality: mortality may reach 50% when RRT is required [10, 11], Theoretically, preventing AKI by early identification of patients at risk or avoiding the progression of its severity may impact outcome of other organs as well [12].
A recently published viewpoint from some of the authors of the present paper proposed that all forms of therapies where blood is extracted from the body and processed with specific devices and techniques can be defined as extracorporeal organ support (ECOS) [13]. This was done to distinguish traditional mechanical ventilation and isolated cardiac support (e.g. ventricular assistance devices or total artificial hearts) from ECOS, which represent a group of increasingly applied systems in the context of MODS and critical illness [14, 15]. RRT has been routinely used for more than three decades in various ICU settings for kidney support. Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) and extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) are currently increasingly used at the bedside for lung support, whereas veno-arterial ECMO (VA-ECMO) may be indicated in patients requiring circulatory and gas exchange support. Other artificial organ supports may include liver support [Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System (MARS), fractionated plasma separation and adsorption (Prometheus), or a bio-artificial system that combines plasma separation with perfusion of bio-reactors filled with human or animal hepatocytes (e.g. extracorporeal liver assist device; ELAD)] or haemoperfusion (in the context of specific intoxications or endotoxaemia).
The aim of this review is to describe the different interaction patterns among failing organs and between native and artificial organs, noting that similar interactions can occur when different ECOS systems are utilized simultaneously (artificial organ interaction). We will particularly focus on the short- and long-term harms and benefits of organ support in terms of renal function, potential indications of RRT outside its conventional indications in patients with MODS and technical considerations when RRT is used alongside other organ support therapies.
The kidney in organ crosstalk and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome
Bidirectional interactions between distant organs are commonly referred to as organ crosstalk, a term that summarizes the complex biological communication and feedback that occurs between different organs mediated via a number of mechanisms including soluble and cellular mechanisms. Organ crosstalk is thought to have a pivotal role in maintaining body homeostasis. Consequently, when pathological conditions occur in one or more organs, they may reach a level of severity that can lead to functional and structural dysfunction in other organs. Such pathological crosstalk may ultimately result in a vicious circle of continuous negative organ interactions that leads to reciprocal end-organ disease progression. The pathogenetic pathway of this process appears to be complex, involving extra- and intracellular mechanisms, biochemical pathways and systemic oxidative stress that variably contribute to worsen tissue function.
Multiple organ interactions involving the kidney are represented in Fig. 1. Cardiorenal syndromes have been subclassified into five separate entities whose etymology reflects the primary and secondary pathology, the chronology of heart–kidney injury, as well as simultaneous cardiac and renal dysfunction due to systemic disease [3]. Renal function and congestion have been identified as important prognostic factors in the outcome of patients with acute and chronic heart failure [16, 17]. Consequently, adequate control of renal congestion and raised abdominal pressure with simultaneous improvement/preservation of renal function have been proposed as central goals of patient management in cardiorenal syndromes [18].
The term pulmonary–renal syndromes typically implies rare disease entities involving a combination of diffuse alveolar haemorrhage originating from the pulmonary microvasculature in conjunction with glomerulonephritis, such as anti-glomerular basement membrane disease (Goodpasture syndrome) and granulomatosis with polyangiitis. However, it may also refer to more common lung–kidney interactions, such as ARDS associated with AKI and uraemic lung associated with advanced kidney disease [19, 20]. Different patterns of ARDS-associated end-organ injury have been identified and AKI may be initiated and/or aggravated via multiple mechanisms, including blood gas disturbances [21,22,23,24], pulmonary hypertension-induced renal congestion [25, 26] and neuro-hormonal dysregulation [4]. All of these conditions compromise renal blood flow and kidney compensatory mechanisms and may be amplified by mechanical ventilation-induced altered haemodynamics [4, 27].
The exacerbation of end-organ injury that occurs as a consequence of ventilator-induced lung injury is caused by the translocation of inflammatory mediators (biotrauma) from the lungs to the systemic circulation and likely activation of pro-apoptotic pathways [28, 29]. Under these circumstances, plasma concentrations of inflammatory biomarkers predict the development of AKI [30] and lack of recovered kidney function [30]. So-called lung-protective ventilation limits lung and distal organs impairment secondary to biotrauma [31, 32]. However, this approach may be associated with hypercapnia and respiratory acidosis and, in some cases, permissive hypoxia that may trigger further distal organ dysfunction and that may be eventually supported by ECOS.
Hepatorenal syndrome describes the development of AKI in patients with advanced liver failure (acute or chronic). It is characterized by marked splanchnic vasodilation, raised abdominal pressure in the presence of ascites and overactivity of the sympathetic nervous and renin–angiotensin system, with subsequent renal vasoconstriction, structural kidney damage and alterations in cardiovascular function [33]. The kidneys are involved in about 50% of all patients with liver failure and AKI is an independent risk factor for mortality [6].
Finally, the gut and kidney may also undergo reciprocal negative interactions due to primary alterations in the host microbiome profile and disruption of the barrier function of the gut, leading to systemic inflammation, AKI, progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) with effects on uraemic toxicity and a potential increase in cardiovascular risk [34]. In turn, once kidney function deteriorates in heart, lung, liver or gut disease, a progressive worsening of the syndrome is typically observed, with unfavourable outcomes.
The sepsis syndrome is another clear example of multiple organ failure, where the contribution of the host response to the initially infected organ may ultimately involve several other “innocent” tissues. Sepsis is the most common clinical scenario where with AKI and MODS are associated [11], and early improvements in renal, cardiovascular or respiratory function are significantly related to improved survival [35], indicating that outcome is strongly related to resolution of AKI. Multiple mechanisms by which sepsis causes AKI have been proposed. These include microcirculatory dysfunction and intrarenal shunting rather than systemic alteration of renal perfusion and renal tubular injury in response to the ultrafiltration of circulating microbial toxins or the release of inflammatory mediators following peritubular microvascular dysfunction, coagulative disturbances with in situ thrombosis or adaptive cell responses to injury [36, 37].
The kidney during extracorporeal organ support
Critically ill patients with AKI in the context of MODS require a complex and articulated therapeutic approach that includes pharmacological and organ-specific preventive and supportive strategies. Currently, various organ support therapies are used in the ICU, although very little is known about their interactions with native organs and other organ support systems. In the following sections, we review the most common types of organ support and their potential effects on renal function.
Extracorporeal lung and mechanical circulatory support
Extracorporeal lung support (VV-ECMO and ECCO2R) and mechanical circulatory support (MCS, such as VA-ECMO) continue to evolve, and are used more often. More than 70% of patients receiving ECMO develop AKI [38] and similar figures are expected for ECCO2R [39]. It is likely that the high prevalence of AKI during extracorporeal lung support and MCS is the result of multiple variables, including underlying disease and severity, comorbid conditions, pre-existing kidney injury and possible adverse effects of lung support and MCS on renal function (Fig. 2).
The beneficial effects of ECMO and ECCO2R may be related to the early correction of blood gas disturbances and decrease in ventilator-induced lung injury, whereas VA-ECMO restores adequate end-organ perfusion during low cardiac output in cardiogenic shock, which is a common trigger for AKI (a type-1 cardiorenal syndrome) [3]. Harmful renal effects may include prolonged pre-hypoxaemia and hypercapnia, hypoperfusion, ischaemia–reperfusion injury, increased risk of bleeding, blood contact with an artificial membrane, haemodynamic instability, malposition of the cannula leading to venous obstruction/arterial hypoperfusion and iatrogenic plaque rupture during arterial cannulation. In particular, patients with underlying CKD, diabetes, hypertension, renovascular disease or ongoing fluid overload with congestion may not reverse their AKI despite the potential beneficial effects of organ support on renal function. Other risk factors include malnourishment, advanced age and use of renin–angiotensin system inhibitors immediately before implantation of extracorporeal lung support and MCS [40].
Even when kidney function improves, there can be a subsequent late decline during prolonged organ support therapy. The risk of sepsis increases with the length of ICU stay as a result of multiple factors, such as the number of cannulation sites, which raises the risk of catheter-related nosocomial bacteraemia, and progressive host defence dysfunction [41]. Other risk factors include bleeding, haemolysis, diminished pulsatility during continuous flow devices and progressive right ventricular failure. Furthermore, once liver failure develops, death usually follows shortly [42, 43].
Haemolysis is thought to result from the combination of shear stress as blood travels through the pump, exposure to the air–fluid interface, excessive negative pressure and the properties of non-endothelialised surfaces [44]. Resultant catalytic iron, formation of obstructive casts and reduced nitric oxide bioavailability may impact vascular responses and multi-organ system function [45]. In addition, the non-pulsatile nature of VA-ECMO may also contribute to a decline in renal function. Continuous blood flow may alter endothelial integrity and result in accelerated oedema formation; it may also activate the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system and cause systemic vasoconstriction and reduced renal perfusion, extending end-organ recovery [46]. However, whether these effects seen in animal models occur identically in humans remains controversial [47].
Finally, pulmonary hypertension and increased right atrial filling pressures have been identified as risk factors for progressive AKI in patients with heart failure [48] and overall outcome in patients undergoing ECMO [49]. Most commonly, VA-ECMO is instituted in the setting of severe cardiac failure (e.g. cardiogenic shock due to cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction) or as bridge to recovery or to transplant in patients with end-stage heart failure [50]. In this scenario, normalising left-ventricular cardiac output and decompressing the right heart by implementing VA-ECMO can improve the arteriovenous pressure gradient across the kidney. On the other hand, the detrimental effect of increased left ventricular afterload and the presence of a low ejection fraction can lead to left ventricular overdistension which can worsen right-sided heart failure and lead to AKI as a result of congestion. Adding a left-ventricular assist device in addition to VA-ECMO in patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction and concomitant right heart dysfunction may actively unload the left ventricle and improve outcomes [51]. However, renal outcome in these patients is unknown. In contrast, patients with acute decompensated pulmonary hypertension without pre-existing left heart disease are less likely to develop left ventricular overdistension and congestion.
Renal replacement therapy and the support of multiple organ dysfunction
RRT, the most commonly used form of organ support therapy worldwide, is required in 10–15% of ICU patients and represents the only effective support for severe AKI [52]. There is a perceived lack of standardization of acute RRT practice, with significant variation among centres worldwide. In various ICU settings, early RRT (outside its conventional indications [53], e.g. significant uraemia, refractory acidosis, hyperkalaemia) has been proposed for conditions such as fluid overload, mediator removal and hypercapnic acidosis in conjunction with ECCO2R. We discuss these applications in the following sections.
Fluid balance
Optimization of fluid balance is a central component of the management of critically ill patients, for example to reduce the need for mechanical ventilation [54] or reduce right ventricular filling pressure in the context of heart failure [17]. Patients requiring ECMO with high blood flows are particularly prone to develop fluid overload as fluids may be generally continued in large amounts to prevent suction of the cannulae. However, fluid overload is associated with prolonged use of ECMO [55, 56] and extracellular fluid volume is recommended to be normalised [57]. Procedures have been proposed to achieve negative fluid balance during ECMO, particularly in patients with severe ARDS [58]. Early renal support in the form of extracorporeal ultrafiltration rather than RRT by dialysis may resolve fluid overload by achieving better sodium removal per unit volume than diuretic therapy. This may improve cardiopulmonary function and long-term outcomes; it may also facilitate nutritional support and drug delivery. However, there are no studies examining the effect of early implementation of ultrafiltration in ECMO/ECCO2R; thus, this subject remains an area of active study.
Mediator removal
Various mediators and cytokines have been implicated in the development and progression of single to multiple organ dysfunction [59]. The kidneys play a causal and modulatory role in MODS via the production, and also decreased clearance, of mediators [20, 60]. Plasma interleukin-6 is the best described mediator of lung injury following AKI [19]. The role of mechanical ventilation-induced biotrauma in the progression of ARDS and development of end-organ dysfunction was discussed above. In patients with ARDS undergoing VV-ECMO [61] and in patients with cardiogenic shock receiving VA-ECMO support [62], high interleukin-10 level is a strong predictor of adverse outcomes. Post-cardiac arrest patients exhibit particularly high levels of cytokines, which may partially explain the high rates of respiratory failure and AKI seen in these patients [63]. Furthermore, levels of cytokines increase significantly during membrane oxygenator exposure, probably as a result of the mobilization of cellular stores [64].
Blood-purification techniques such as high-volume haemofiltration, plasma adsorption, plasma filtration, high cut-off haemofiltration and haemoperfusion have a hypothesized therapeutic benefit in patients with ARDS, with or without ECMO, cardiogenic shock and/or AKI. This is thought to be due to their ability to remove inflammatory mediators and cytokines, decrease macrophage and monocyte activity and inactivate circulating pro-apoptotic factors involved in sepsis [65]. However, insufficient evidence exists of a therapeutic benefit for their routine use, possibly because of differences in the timing of implementation and patient selection criteria [66,67,68]. Inflammatory mediator levels vary widely [69] and extracorporeal blood purification may fail to significantly modulate their plasma levels [70]. Still, up to 11–22% of patients with sepsis receive high-volume haemofiltration [71, 72].
Furthermore, unlike the native kidney, which can regulate the loss of electrolytes and micronutrients, RRT (particularly with high effluent doses) demands close monitoring to avoid hypophosphataemia and hypokalaemia (Fig. 3). Increased solute clearance is accompanied by losses of antibiotics and other medications, which may counter the beneficial effects of blood-purification techniques [66]. This is less likely to occur with extracorporeal ultrafiltration. In contrast, RRT may lead to non-significant loss of catecholamines [73]. Only case reports are available on the use of extracorporeal blood-purification techniques with ECMO [74, 75]. Given the absence of clear evidence for improved survival, blood purification techniques cannot be routinely recommended as an adjuvant therapy for septic shock and MODS. Future investigations will need to evaluate whether a personalized approach that links the use of extracorporeal blood-purification techniques to mediator levels [76] and matches antibiotic and electrolyte loss to RRT intensity improves outcomes in these patients. The results of a multicentre randomized clinical trial, the Evaluating Use of Polymyxin B Haemoperfusion in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Adults Treated for Endotoxaemia and Septic Shock (EUPHRATES) (NCT01046669), should help to define the clinical efficacy of extracorporeal endotoxin removal in patients with septic shock.
Hypercapnic acidosis
Protective ventilation is the current standard of care for patients with ARDS [31]. However, further reductions in tidal volume to 4 ml/kg and plateau pressure to 25 cmH2O have been suggested to further attenuate the pulmonary, renal and systemic inflammatory response due to ventilator-induced lung injury [77, 78], which may improve clinical outcome [79]. ECCO2R may be required to manage the respiratory acidosis secondary to low minute ventilation [80]; RRT and ECCO2R may be combined in a single treatment to allow ‘super-protective’ settings [78] and the reduction of vasopressor demands in patients with ARDS experiencing AKI [81, 82]. Patients with severe respiratory acidosis require more invasive ECCO2R devices with higher blood flow rates (> 750 ml/min) to stabilize pH and RRT in combination with ECCO2R [83]. However, ECCO2R, particularly in combination with RRT, remains experimental, especially in patients with ARDS in whom the evidence of the benefits has only been suggested on the basis of case series, studies involving surrogate markers and post hoc analyses [77, 79, 84]. Prospective studies are required to confirm that the combination of ECCO2R and RRT can improve survival in this cohort.
Special aspects
Haemodynamic instability during organ support therapy
Haemodynamic instability during RRT is a frequent complication in critically ill patients. Even during continuous RRT, the rate of haemodynamic instability ranges from 13% to 43% [85] and this rate can increase when RRT is used alongside other organ support therapies. Hypotensive episodes during organ support may exacerbate organ hypoperfusion and negatively affect organ recovery [86]. Continuous RRT with variable ultrafiltration rates is by far the preferred option internationally to prevent haemodynamic instability in patients on vasopressors, receiving other forms of organ support. However, there is a lack of evidence on the efficacy of any particular intervention in mitigating haemodynamic instability when RRT is used with other organ support therapies. Most studies were performed in end-stage renal disease patients on maintenance dialysis, which may not be transferrable to the critically ill patient. Automated biofeedback systems have been advocated to maintain a balance between ultrafiltration and plasma refilling rate while preventing haemodynamic instability during RRT. Such systems would continuously adjust dialysate conductivity and ultrafiltration rate in response to changes in blood volume (e.g. by dialysate sodium modelling) and vital signs (Fig. 3) [87]. Cooler dialysate promotes vasoconstriction by reducing heat transfer from the dialysate and may mitigate myocardial stunning [88], a phenomenon that has recently been shown to occur in patients with AKI treated with RRT [89]. However, patients requiring vasopressors may not benefit from cooler dialysate to prevent haemodynamic instability; thus, this subject remains an area of active study.
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and renal replacement therapy: artificial organ crosstalk
The use of ECMO is increasing worldwide [13]. However, more than 50–65% of patients who develop AKI undergo RRT during ECMO treatment [38]. RRT is associated with high mortality rates in patients receiving ECMO [38]; yet these results are controversial [90]. Currently, common indications for RRT during ECMO include fluid overload (43%), AKI (35%), prevention of fluid overload (16%) and electrolyte disturbances (4%) [91]. The figures are similar for ECCO2R [39]. Recently, a favourable trend towards lower mortality has been observed in patients with severe ARDS when these were randomized to early VV-ECMO [92]; however, it remains unknown when and how to apply a hybrid therapy for multiple organ dysfunction.
The relationship between ECMO and RRT is important in a number of ways and is related to catheters, coagulation, technical aspects and the management of haemodynamics, acid–base balance, fluids and drugs. During ECMO, the most commonly used RRT modality is continuous veno-venous haemofiltration (43%); extracorporeal ultrafiltration is performed in only 18% of patients [91]. Approximately 21% of centres use a haemodiafilter in the ECMO circuit (in-line) primarily for extracorporeal ultrafiltration; in most cases (51%), RRT is connected to the circuit [91]. The risks associated with use of additional catheters for RRT delivery must be weighed against the risks of haemolysis, thrombosis and disseminated intravascular coagulation as a result of manipulation of the ECMO circuit (Fig. 3). Many centres prefer to perform RRT through venous access independent of the ECMO circuit, despite an increased risk of bleeding, as continuous anticoagulation may be required to minimize clot formation in the ECMO circuit. Connection of RRT to ECMO, however, is particularly important in paediatric patients because of the paucity of sites available for direct vessel cannulation. If a patient requires only carbon dioxide removal, ECMO can be continued with lower blood flow rates (ca. 1000 ml/min). However, if a patient receiving ECCO2R requires ECMO support, larger cannulae must be used to ensure sufficient flow rates.
Anticoagulation
In the presence of systemic anticoagulation, additional anticoagulation for the RRT circuit during ECMO/ECCO2R is usually unnecessary. Depending on the site of connection of RRT to the ECMO/ECCO2R circuit, clotting in the haemofilter may have important implications. It may contribute to clotting of the oxygenator (when post-RRT blood is returned pre oxygenator), to pulmonary embolism (when post-RRT blood is returned post oxygenator in VV-ECMO/ECCO2R and AV-ECCO2R) or to arterial embolism (when post-RRT blood is returned post oxygenator in VA-ECMO) (Fig. 3). Greater systemic anticoagulation could alleviate this problem but would also increase the risk of haemorrhage [93]. Figure 4 illustrates possible RRT set-ups in conjunction with ECMO/ECCO2R. Regional citrate anticoagulation is the method of choice for RRT: its advantages include longer filter survival time and fewer bleeding events [53, 93]. Because of their stiffness and large size, ECMO cannulae are associated with systemic thrombogenic risk and therefore regional citrate anticoagulation alone is insufficient. RRT with regional citrate anticoagulation in combination with ECMO/ECCO2R may ensure effective RRT delivery and allow the use of low-dose heparin for ECMO/ECCO2R despite significant citrate dilution through the ECMO/ECCO2R blood flow [93, 94]. With the inflow of the RRT circuit connected to the post-oxygenator port and the outflow connected to the pre-oxygenator port (Fig. 4, position 2), regional citrate anticoagulation is mixed with pre-oxygenator blood, passes through the oxygenator, and partially recirculates in the RRT circuit; this may further reduce clotting events in the oxygenator. Calcium infused through a separate central venous catheter helps avoid coagulation in the distal limb of the ECMO/ECCO2R circuit. In patients with VV-ECCO2R, citrate can be infused in the proximal limb of the extracorporeal circuit, while calcium can be infused in the distal limb (Fig. 4, position 2). In particular, patients with a high bleeding risk and recurrent clot formation in the membrane ventilator may benefit from this hybrid technique. However, it should be noted that use of regional citrate anticoagulation remains experimental in the context of artificial lung support, and patients with co-existing liver failure require close attention to avoid the risk of citrate accumulation and toxicity [95]. In general, high ECMO blood flow without catheter dysfunction is associated with less clotting of RRT filters, and since ECMO circuits are heparin-coated systemic anticoagulation may be suspended in case of serious bleedings.
Antibiotics and other medications
Selection of antibiotic and sedation/opioid doses in critically ill patients is challenging because their pharmacokinetic profile is markedly altered by the increased volume of distribution and impaired liver and renal function. RRT with ECMO/ECCO2R support further complicates the issue because the concentration and half-life of medications are affected by RRT variables such as blood/dialysate flow and the sieving coefficient of the haemodialyser. This is particularly the case for plasma separation and haemoperfusion. They may also be affected by inflammatory activation induced by the extracorporeal circulation, exposure of blood to foreign material and drug sequestration in the circuit [96, 97]. Conversely, the ECMO circuit may serve as a reservoir and redistribute the sequestered drug back into the patient even after administration of the drug has been discontinued, potentially leading to prolonged undesirable pharmacological effects. In general, lipophilic medications with a large volume of distribution are markedly sequestered in the circuit (e.g. voriconazole, propofol, fentanyl, midazolam [98,99,100]), whereas hydrophilic medications with a small volume of distribution are dialysed and adsorbed less by the membrane (e.g. piperacillin–tazobactam, vancomycin, aminoglycosides [100,101,102,103,104]). Evidence-based guidelines for antibiotic therapy and other drugs with therapeutic narrow window during RRT and ECMO/ECCO2R are awaited.
Technical considerations
When RRT is used in conjunction with the ECMO circuit, inflow and outflow can be connected in some devices to the post-pump and pre-oxygenator limbs using two high-flow Luer lock three-way taps. Of note, probably the safest placement of RRT in the ECMO circuit is an outflow connection to the pre-oxygenator limb as the oxygenator can serve as a bubble trap and minimize the risk of gas embolism in the lungs (during VV-ECMO/AV-ECCO2R) and systemic circulation (during VA-ECMO) (Fig. 3). The ECMO circuit between the pump and the oxygenator has the highest positive pressure (ranging from +150 mmHg to +350 mmHg), and this may interfere with the functioning of the RRT circuit. However, most modern RRT machines can tolerate positive pressure on the outflow limb (from +350 mmHg to +500 mmHg) [93]. If the pressure within the ECMO circuit causes the access pressure in the RRT circuit to exceed the alarm limit for inflow pressure, a long monitoring extension line attached to the RRT access can help lower the pressure and allow the RRT to function appropriately. In case of high return pressures, a pinch clamping of the dialysate outflow line could be used to achieve pressure equalization between the blood and dialysate, or the outflow limb could be connected to an alternative venous access.
Conclusions
Multiple organ support therapy (MOST) appears as a viable ECOS option in the critically ill patient with MODS. The rationale is both to provide a rescue life-saving therapy with the hope of bridging patients to recovery (i.e. up to source control achievement or lung-renal function recovery in the context of complicated viral ARDS) and to interrupt negative native organ interactions. Multiple organ support should take into account the technical effort and dedicated skills of the multidisciplinary staff in order to be safely and effectively delivered. Furthermore, native to artificial organ interaction in (i.e. RRT with the lungs) and artificial to artificial organ crosstalk (i.e. in case of RRT connection to ECMO) must be carefully considered when these complex cases are treated.
Drug delivery, anticoagulation modalities and staff organization are all deeply challenged when MOST is delivered. Careful assessment of risk factors and effective engagement of a multidisciplinary team (such as intensivists, nephrologists, cardiologists; cardiac, thoracic and vascular surgeons; perfusionists, dedicated nurses, pharmacists, respiratory therapists and others) in the artificial organ support planning may help improve outcomes. Further studies are needed to establish the ideal timing of interventions, to assess whether early implementation affects organ recovery and optimizes resource utilization. Finally, it is our belief that future research will be able to conceive a MOST integrated platform, facilitating application and timing of any form of ECOS.
References
Vincent JL, Sakr Y, Sprung CL et al (2006) Sepsis in European intensive care units: results of the SOAP study. Crit Care Med 34:344–353
Ronco C, Cicoira M, McCullough PA (2012) Cardiorenal syndrome type 1: pathophysiological crosstalk leading to combined heart and kidney dysfunction in the setting of acutely decompensated heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 60:1031–1042
Ronco C, Haapio M, House AA, Anavekar N, Bellomo R (2008) Cardiorenal syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:1527–1539
Husain-Syed F, Slutsky AS, Ronco C (2016) Lung-kidney cross-talk in the critically ill patient. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 194:402–414
Husain-Syed F, McCullough PA, Birk HW et al (2015) Cardio-pulmonary-renal interactions: a multidisciplinary approach. J Am Coll Cardiol 65:2433–2448
Nadim MK, Kellum JA, Davenport A et al (2012) Hepatorenal syndrome: the 8th international consensus conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group. Crit Care 16:R23
Del Sorbo L, Slutsky AS (2011) Acute respiratory distress syndrome and multiple organ failure. Curr Opin Crit Care 17:1–6
Kellum JA, Prowle JR (2018) Paradigms of acute kidney injury in the intensive care setting. Nat Rev Nephrol. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2017.184
Hoste EA, Bagshaw SM, Bellomo R et al (2015) Epidemiology of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: the multinational AKI-EPI study. Intensive Care Med 41:1411–1423
Bagshaw SM, George C, Bellomo R, Committe ADM (2008) A comparison of the RIFLE and AKIN criteria for acute kidney injury in critically ill patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 23:1569–1574
Singbartl K, Kellum JA (2012) AKI in the ICU: definition, epidemiology, risk stratification, and outcomes. Kidney Int 81:819–825
Meersch M, Schmidt C, Hoffmeier A et al (2017) Prevention of cardiac surgery-associated AKI by implementing the KDIGO guidelines in high risk patients identified by biomarkers: the PrevAKI randomized controlled trial. Intensive Care Med 43:1551–1561
Ranieri VM, Brodie D, Vincent JL (2017) Extracorporeal organ support: from technological tool to clinical strategy supporting severe organ failure. JAMA 318:1105–1106
Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T (2016) Epidemiology, patterns of care, and mortality for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units in 50 countries. JAMA 315:788–800
Goligher EC, Amato MBP, Slutsky AS (2017) Applying precision medicine to trial design using physiology. extracorporeal CO2 removal for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 196:558–568
Sarraf M, Masoumi A, Schrier RW (2009) Cardiorenal syndrome in acute decompensated heart failure. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 4:2013–2026
Costanzo MR, Ronco C, Abraham WT (2017) Extracorporeal ultrafiltration for fluid overload in heart failure: current status and prospects for further research. J Am Coll Cardiol 69:2428–2445
Fg J, von Haehling S, Anker SD, Raj DS, Radhakrishnan J (2013) The relevance of congestion in the cardio-renal syndrome. Kidney Int 83:384–391
Seeley EJ (2013) Updates in the management of acute lung injury: a focus on the overlap between AKI and ARDS. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 20:14–20
Li X, Hassoun HT, Santora R, Rabb H (2009) Organ crosstalk: the role of the kidney. Curr Opin Crit Care 15:481–487
Sharkey RA, Mulloy EM, O’Neill SJ (1998) Acute effects of hypoxaemia, hyperoxaemia and hypercapnia on renal blood flow in normal and renal transplant subjects. Eur Respir J 12:653–657
Darmon M, Schortgen F, Leon R et al (2009) Impact of mild hypoxemia on renal function and renal resistive index during mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med 35:1031–1038
Darmon M, Clec’h C, Adrie C et al (2014) Acute respiratory distress syndrome and risk of AKI among critically ill patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 9:1347–1353
Sharkey RA, Mulloy EM, Kilgallen IA, O’Neill SJ (1997) Renal functional reserve in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax 52:411–415
Mekontso Dessap A, Charron C, Devaquet J et al (2009) Impact of acute hypercapnia and augmented positive end-expiratory pressure on right ventricle function in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med 35:1850–1858
Chen KP, Cavender S, Lee J et al (2016) Peripheral edema, central venous pressure, and risk of AKI in critical illness. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 11:602–608
Ranieri VM, Giunta F, Suter PM, Slutsky AS (2000) Mechanical ventilation as a mediator of multisystem organ failure in acute respiratory distress syndrome. JAMA 284:43–44
Liu KD, Glidden DV, Eisner MD et al (2007) Predictive and pathogenetic value of plasma biomarkers for acute kidney injury in patients with acute lung injury. Crit Care Med 35:2755–2761
Slutsky AS, Ranieri VM (2013) Ventilator-induced lung injury. N Engl J Med 369:2126–2136
Murugan R, Wen X, Shah N et al (2014) Plasma inflammatory and apoptosis markers are associated with dialysis dependence and death among critically ill patients receiving renal replacement therapy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 29:1854–1864
The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network (2000) Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 342:1301–1308
Imai Y, Parodo J, Kajikawa O et al (2003) Injurious mechanical ventilation and end-organ epithelial cell apoptosis and organ dysfunction in an experimental model of acute respiratory distress syndrome. JAMA 289:2104–2112
Fagundes C, Gines P (2012) Hepatorenal syndrome: a severe, but treatable, cause of kidney failure in cirrhosis. Am J Kidney Dis 59:874–885
Jacobs MC, Haak BW, Hugenholtz F et al (2017) Gut microbiota and host defense in critical illness. Curr Opin Crit Care 23:257–263
Levy MM, Macias WL, Vincent JL et al (2005) Early changes in organ function predict eventual survival in severe sepsis. Crit Care Med 33:2194–2201
Gomez H, Ince C, De Backer D et al (2014) A unified theory of sepsis-induced acute kidney injury: inflammation, microcirculatory dysfunction, bioenergetics, and the tubular cell adaptation to injury. Shock 41:3–11
Bellomo R, Kellum JA, Ronco C et al (2017) Acute kidney injury in sepsis. Intensive Care Med 43:816–828
Kielstein JT, Heiden AM, Beutel G et al (2013) Renal function and survival in 200 patients undergoing ECMO therapy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 28:86–90
Kielstein JT, Tolk S, Hafer C et al (2011) Effect of acute kidney injury requiring extended dialysis on 28 day and 1 year survival of patients undergoing interventional lung assist membrane ventilator treatment. BMC Nephrol 12:15
Hasin T, Topilsky Y, Schirger JA et al (2012) Changes in renal function after implantation of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices. J Am Coll Cardiol 59:26–36
Schmidt M, Brechot N, Hariri S et al (2012) Nosocomial infections in adult cardiogenic shock patients supported by venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Clin Infect Dis 55:1633–1641
Blandino Ortiz A, Lamanna I, Antonucci E et al (2017) Altered liver function in patients undergoing veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy. Minerva Anestesiol 83:255–265
Roth C, Schrutka L, Binder C et al (2016) Liver function predicts survival in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation following cardiovascular surgery. Crit Care 20:57
Chen H, Yu RG, Yin NN, Zhou JX (2014) Combination of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients: a systematic review. Crit Care 18:675
Vermeulen Windsant IC, de Wit NC, Sertorio JT et al (2014) Hemolysis during cardiac surgery is associated with increased intravascular nitric oxide consumption and perioperative kidney and intestinal tissue damage. Front Physiol 5:340
Ootaki C, Yamashita M, Ootaki Y et al (2008) Reduced pulsatility induces periarteritis in kidney: role of the local renin-angiotensin system. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 136:150–158
Brisco MA, Kimmel SE, Coca SG et al (2014) Prevalence and prognostic importance of changes in renal function after mechanical circulatory support. Circ Heart Fail 7:68–75
Abraham WT, Adamson PB, Bourge RC et al (2011) Wireless pulmonary artery haemodynamic monitoring in chronic heart failure: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 377:658–666
Bartko PE, Wiedemann D, Schrutka L et al (2017) Impact of right ventricular performance in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation following cardiac surgery. J Am Heart Assoc 6:e005455
Lorusso R, Gelsomino S, Parise O et al (2017) Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiogenic shock in elderly patients: trends in application and outcome from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) registry. Ann Thorac Surg 104:62–69
Pappalardo F, Schulte C, Pieri M et al (2017) Concomitant implantation of Impella® on top of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation may improve survival of patients with cardiogenic shock. Eur J Heart Fail 19:404–412
Vincent JL, Marshall JC, Namendys-Silva SA et al (2014) Assessment of the worldwide burden of critical illness: the intensive care over nations (ICON) audit. Lancet Respir Med 2:380–386
Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Acute Kidney Injury Work Group (2012) KDIGO clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. Kidney Int Suppl 2(1):1–138
Wiedemann HP, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network (2006) Comparison of two fluid-management strategies in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med 354:2564–2575
Blijdorp K, Cransberg K, Wildschut ED et al (2009) Haemofiltration in newborns treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a case-comparison study. Crit Care 13:R48
Schmidt M, Bailey M, Kelly J et al (2014) Impact of fluid balance on outcome of adult patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Intensive Care Med 40:1256–1266
Extracoporeal Life Support Organization (2013) General guidelines for all ECLS cases. https://www.elso.org/Portals/0/IGD/Archive/FileManager/929122ae88cusersshyerdocumentselsoguidelinesgeneralalleclsversion1.3.pdf. Accessed 31 Jul 2017
Brodie D, Bacchetta M (2011) Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for ARDS in adults. N Engl J Med 365:1905–1914
Kox WJ, Volk T, Kox SN, Volk HD (2000) Immunomodulatory therapies in sepsis. Intensive Care Med 26(Suppl 1):S124–S128
Rabb H (2012) The promise of immune cell therapy for acute kidney injury. J Clin Invest 122:3852–3854
Liu CH, Kuo SW, Ko WJ et al (2017) Early measurement of IL-10 predicts the outcomes of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Sci Rep 7:1021
Hong TH, Kuo SW, Hu FC et al (2014) Do interleukin-10 and superoxide ions predict outcomes of cardiac extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients? Antioxid Redox Signal 20:60–68
Jentzer JC, Chonde MD, Dezfulian C (2015) Myocardial dysfunction and shock after cardiac arrest. Biomed Res Int 2015:314796
Mc IRB, Timpa JG, Kurundkar AR et al (2010) Plasma concentrations of inflammatory cytokines rise rapidly during ECMO-related SIRS due to the release of preformed stores in the intestine. Lab Investig 90:128–139
Putzu A, Fang MX, Boscolo Berto M et al (2017) Blood purification with continuous veno-venous hemofiltration in patients with sepsis or ARDS: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Anestesiol 83:867–877
Joannes-Boyau O, Honore PM, Perez P et al (2013) High-volume versus standard-volume haemofiltration for septic shock patients with acute kidney injury (IVOIRE study): a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Intensive Care Med 39:1535–1546
Quenot JP, Binquet C, Vinsonneau C et al (2015) Very high volume hemofiltration with the cascade system in septic shock patients. Intensive Care Med 41:2111–2120
Payen DM, Guilhot J, Launey Y et al (2015) Early use of polymyxin B hemoperfusion in patients with septic shock due to peritonitis: a multicenter randomized control trial. Intensive Care Med 41:975–984
Kellum JA, Kong L, Fink MP et al (2007) Understanding the inflammatory cytokine response in pneumonia and sepsis: results of the Genetic and Inflammatory Markers of Sepsis (GenIMS) Study. Arch Intern Med 167:1655–1663
Honore PM, Jacobs R, Joannes-Boyau O et al (2013) Newly designed CRRT membranes for sepsis and SIRS—a pragmatic approach for bedside intensivists summarizing the more recent advances: a systematic structured review. ASAIO J 59:99–106
Uchino S, Bellomo R, Morimatsu H et al (2007) Continuous renal replacement therapy: a worldwide practice survey. The beginning and ending supportive therapy for the kidney (B.E.S.T. kidney) investigators. Intensive Care Med 33:1563–1570
Vesconi S, Cruz DN, Fumagalli R et al (2009) Delivered dose of renal replacement therapy and mortality in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. Crit Care 13:R57
Bellomo R, McGrath B, Boyce N (1994) Effect of continuous venovenous hemofiltration with dialysis on hormone and catecholamine clearance in critically ill patients with acute renal failure. Crit Care Med 22:833–837
Marek S, Gamper G, Reining G, Bergmann P, Mayr H, Kliegel A (2017) ECMO and cytokine removal for bridging to surgery in a patient with ischemic ventricular septal defect—a case report. Int J Artif Organs 40:526–529
Lees NJ, Rosenberg A, Hurtado-Doce AI et al (2016) Combination of ECMO and cytokine adsorption therapy for severe sepsis with cardiogenic shock and ARDS due to Panton-Valentine leukocidin-positive Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia and H1N1. J Artif Organs 19:399–402
Cutuli SL, Artigas A, Fumagalli R et al (2016) Polymyxin-B hemoperfusion in septic patients: analysis of a multicenter registry. Ann Intensive Care 6:77
Terragni PP, Del Sorbo L, Mascia L et al (2009) Tidal volume lower than 6 ml/kg enhances lung protection: role of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal. Anesthesiology 111:826–835
Fanelli V, Cantaluppi V, Alessandri F et al (2018) Extracorporeal CO2 removal may improve renal function of patients with ARDS and acute kidney injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201712-2575LE
Bein T, Weber-Carstens S, Goldmann A et al (2013) Lower tidal volume strategy (approximately 3 ml/kg) combined with extracorporeal CO2 removal versus ‘conventional’ protective ventilation (6 ml/kg) in severe ARDS: the prospective randomized Xtravent-study. Intensive Care Med 39:847–856
Fanelli V, Ranieri MV, Mancebo J et al (2016) Feasibility and safety of low-flow extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal to facilitate ultra-protective ventilation in patients with moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care 20:36
Forster C, Schriewer J, John S, Eckardt KU, Willam C (2013) Low-flow CO(2) removal integrated into a renal-replacement circuit can reduce acidosis and decrease vasopressor requirements. Crit Care 17:R154
Allardet-Servent J, Castanier M, Signouret T, Soundaravelou R, Lepidi A, Seghboyan JM (2015) Safety and efficacy of combined extracorporeal CO2 removal and renal replacement therapy in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute kidney injury: the pulmonary and renal support in acute respiratory distress syndrome study. Crit Care Med 43:2570–2581
Karagiannidis C, Strassmann S, Brodie D et al (2017) Impact of membrane lung surface area and blood flow on extracorporeal CO2 removal during severe respiratory acidosis. Intensive Care Med Exp 5:34
Taccone FS, Malfertheiner MV, Ferrari F et al (2017) Extracorporeal CO2 removal in critically ill patients: a systematic review. Minerva Anestesiol 83:762–772
Douvris A, Malhi G, Hiremath S et al (2018) Interventions to prevent hemodynamic instability during renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients: a systematic review. Crit Care 22:41
Douvris A, Hiremath S, McIntyre L, Sikora L, Weber C, Clark EG (2017) Interventions to prevent hemodynamic instability during renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury: a systematic review protocol. Syst Rev 6:113
Vinsonneau C, Allain-Launay E, Blayau C et al (2015) Renal replacement therapy in adult and pediatric intensive care: recommendations by an expert panel from the French Intensive Care Society (SRLF) with the French Society of Anesthesia Intensive Care (SFAR) French Group for Pediatric Intensive Care Emergencies (GFRUP) the French Dialysis Society (SFD). Ann Intensive Care 5:58
Odudu A, Eldehni MT, McCann GP, McIntyre CW (2015) Randomized controlled trial of individualized dialysate cooling for cardiac protection in hemodialysis patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 10:1408–1417
Mahmoud H, Forni LG, McIntyre CW, Selby NM (2017) Myocardial stunning occurs during intermittent haemodialysis for acute kidney injury. Intensive Care Med 43:942–944
Antonucci E, Lamanna I, Fagnoul D, Vincent JL, De Backer D, Silvio Taccone F (2016) The impact of renal failure and renal replacement therapy on outcome during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy. Artif Organs 40:746–754
Fleming GM, Askenazi DJ, Bridges BC et al (2012) A multicenter international survey of renal supportive therapy during ECMO: the Kidney Intervention During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (KIDMO) group. ASAIO J 58:407–414
Combes A, Hajage D, Capellier G et al (2018) Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 387:1965–1975
Shum HP, Kwan AM, Chan KC, Yan WW (2014) The use of regional citrate anticoagulation continuous venovenous hemofiltration in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. ASAIO J 60:413–418
Atalan HK, Gucyetmez B, Dumantepe M et al (2015) The combined use of pumpless extracorporeal lung assist and continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration with citrate anticoagulation in polytrauma patients. Intensive Care Med 41:2024–2025
Schultheiss C, Saugel B, Phillip V et al (2012) Continuous venovenous hemodialysis with regional citrate anticoagulation in patients with liver failure: a prospective observational study. Crit Care 16:R162
Shekar K, Roberts JA, McDonald CI et al (2015) Protein-bound drugs are prone to sequestration in the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit: results from an ex vivo study. Crit Care 19:164
Trotman RL, Williamson JC, Shoemaker DM, Salzer WL (2005) Antibiotic dosing in critically ill adult patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy. Clin Infect Dis 41:1159–1166
Shekar K, Roberts JA, McDonald CI et al (2012) Sequestration of drugs in the circuit may lead to therapeutic failure during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Crit Care 16:R194
Spriet I, Annaert P, Meersseman P et al (2009) Pharmacokinetics of caspofungin and voriconazole in critically ill patients during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Antimicrob Chemother 63:767–770
Lemaitre F, Hasni N, Leprince P et al (2015) Propofol, midazolam, vancomycin and cyclosporine therapeutic drug monitoring in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuits primed with whole human blood. Crit Care 19:40
Shotwell MS, Nesbitt R, Madonia PN et al (2016) Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of extended infusion versus short infusion piperacillin-tazobactam in critically ill patients undergoing CRRT. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 11:1377–1383
Dzierba AL, Abrams D, Brodie D (2017) Medicating patients during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: the evidence is building. Crit Care 21:66
Donadello K, Antonucci E, Cristallini S et al (2015) β-Lactam pharmacokinetics during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy: a case-control study. Int J Antimicrob Agents 45:278–282
Donadello K, Roberts JA, Cristallini S et al (2014) Vancomycin population pharmacokinetics during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy: a matched cohort study. Crit Care 18:632
Acknowledgements
This paper was produced in conjunction with the participants of the Round Table Conference on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) at the ISICEM, Brussels, Belgium, on March 18–20, 2017. The authors wish to acknowledge the contributions of the Round Table participants. Chairpersons: BRODIE Daniel, RANIERI V. Marco. Participants: BAKKER Jan, BROCHARD Laurent, BROOME Michael, COMBES Alain, CRETEUR Jacques, DE BACKER Daniel, FERGUSON Niall, LAFFEY John, LORUSSO Roberto, MERCAT Alain, NAVA Stefano, PAPAZIAN Laurent, PESENTI Antonio, QUINTEL Michael, RIMENSBERGER Peter, SLADEN Robert, STAUDINGER Thomas.
Funding
There was no funding source for this review.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
FHS is an internist, nephrologist, pulmonologist and intensivist, and prepared all drafts of the manuscript. ZR’s expertise is in the field of extracorporeal lung support and renal replacement therapy; he was involved in the writing and editing of the manuscript, including the figures. DB provided expertise in the field of extracorporeal lung support and was involved in writing and editing the manuscript, including the figures. JLV provided expertise in the field of critical care and was involved in writing and editing the manuscript, including the figures. MR provided expertise in the field of extracorporeal lung support and was involved in writing and editing the manuscript, including the figures. ASS provided expertise in the field of lung disorders and was involved in writing and editing the manuscript, including the figures. FST provided expertise in the field of extracorporeal lung support and was involved in writing and editing the manuscript. LG provided expertise in the field of extracorporeal lung support and was involved in writing and editing the manuscript. CR was involved in the writing and editing of the manuscript, including the figures. Claudio Ronco conceived the concept underlying the manuscript and is the senior author of the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
None of the other authors declare any competing interests. The authors shared manuscript design, literature collection, literature analysis and literature interpretation; preparation, review and approval of the manuscript. The corresponding author had full access to all of the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. All authors declare that the results presented in this paper have not been published previously in whole or part, except in abstract format.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Husain-Syed, F., Ricci, Z., Brodie, D. et al. Extracorporeal organ support (ECOS) in critical illness and acute kidney injury: from native to artificial organ crosstalk. Intensive Care Med 44, 1447–1459 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5329-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5329-z