Abstract
The prophylactic use of neonicotinoids in paddy fields has raised concern due to its toxicity to ecological systems and human health. The present study evaluated the concentrations of neonicotinoids such as clothianidin, imidacloprid, thiamethoxam, acetamiprid, and thiacloprid in the water-soil systems of the paddy fields, and their potential discharge into the groundwater along the Cauvery delta region, South India. Though neonicotinoids are extensively sprayed in the paddy fields, the concentration of residues analyzed by QuEChERS, combined with LC–MS/MS found no detectable residues at concentrations above LOD. The LOD and the LOQ values for water and soil were 0.001 ppm and 0.0025 ppm and 0.025 ppm and 0.05 ppm respectively. The results of the study found that neonicotinoids are less persistent in the water-soil systems of the delta region as they are readily exposed to photolysis and undergo rapid microbial degradation. Further, the hydropedological characteristics of the highly saturated delta soil facilitate ready leaching followed by vertical migration and infiltration into the soil aquifers.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
The prophylactic use of neonicotinoid pesticides in paddy fields against a wide range of pests has raised concern due to its toxicity to the water-soil systems, environment, and human health. Among neonicotinoids, imidacloprid, clothianidin, acetamiprid, thiamethoxam, and thiacloprid are widely popular (Zhang et al. 2019) of which, imidacloprid is highly toxic to the non-target groups (Cox 2001). Though these pesticides are neurotoxic, they are extensively sprayed through the different stages of plant growth (Sattler et al. 2018). Agricultural activities including seed treatments, sprays, irrigation systems (Elbert et al. 2008), and agricultural runoff are the dispersion sources of neonicotinoids into the environment and the surrounding water-soil systems (Jurado et al. 2019). Neonicotinoids are highly water-soluble (Wood and Goulson 2017; Reynoso et al. 2019) and their absorption and degradation depend on various hydropedological characteristics of the soil such as pH, ambient temperature, texture, moisture, organic carbon, and organic matter (Karmakar 2006; Bonmatin et al. 2015; Pietrzak et al. 2020). Among the soil types, loamy soil exhibits maximum retention followed by clay and sandy soil (Mortl et al. 2016; Leiva et al. 2017). Warmer regions have reported higher pesticide degradation with increasing temperatures (Hooper et al. 2013) whereas, colder regions showed slower degradation. Numerous studies have raised concerns over the toxicity levels of neonicotinoids in the soil (Schaafsma et al. 2015; Limay-Rios et al. 2016), water (Morrissey et al. 2015; Benton et al. 2016), and in different levels of organisms (Rundlof et al. 2015; Chan et al. 2019; Holtswarth et al. 2019; Gunalet al. 2020). The extensive use of these pesticides has also affected the provisioning of vital ecosystem services by birds and bees thus affecting crop production. (Chagnon et al. 2015). Neonicotinoids are widely used in rice cultivation and paddy being the principal crop of the delta, are highly exposed to these insecticides than other food crops cultivated along this delta belt.
The Cauvery delta region is widely known as “Nerkalanchiyam”, the land of paddy cultivation, and also as the ‘rice bowl’ of South India. The rice grown along the Cauvery delta zone belongs to the traditional varieties. The major part of the basin is covered by agricultural land accounting for 66.21% of the total area and 4.09% of the basin is covered with aquatic bodies. There are limited field studies on neonicotinoids along the Cauvery delta region under realistic agricultural conditions, and there still exist knowledge gaps on the impacts of exposure. The present study will help in evaluating the concentration of neonicotinoids in water-soil systems in the paddy fields along the delta region and their discharge into the groundwater under realistic agricultural conditions. We hypothesize that the hydropedological characteristic of the highly saturated delta soil reduces the persistence of detectable neonicotinoid residues in the water-soil systems in the paddy fields.
Materials and Methods
A total of 12 samples (six soil and six water samples) were collected and analyzed from the regions of Kallanai, Thiruvaiyaru, Needmanagalam, and Mannargudi along the Cauvery delta region, South India (Fig. 1). Upon immediate transportation to the laboratory, the samples were stored at − 20°C. The analytical standards of neonicotinoids including clothianidin, imidacloprid, thiamethoxam, acetamiprid, and thiacloprid were purchased from Dr. Erhenstorfer, Germany. Standard stock solutions (400 µg/mL) were prepared by dissolving a weighed quantity of technical-grade material in LC–MS grade acetonitrile (50:50). The stock solutions were diluted to prepare an intermediate stock solution (40 µg/mL) and the working standards by diluting the intermediate stock solution. The extraction and clean-up procedures were done following the QuEChERS method (Anastassiades et al. 2003).
For soil analysis, 10 g soil was transferred to a 50 mL centrifuge tube containing 20 ml acetonitrile and briefly vortexed for 1 min. To this, 4 g anhydrous magnesium sulfate and 1 g sodium chloride were added, and again vortexed for 1 min. After centrifugation for 6000 rpm for 10 min, 9 mL of clear supernatant was transferred to a new centrifuge tube containing 100 mg Primary Secondary Amine (PSA), 10 mg Graphitized Carbon Black (GCB), and 600 mg anhydrous magnesium sulfate. After vigorous shaking for a minute, the tube was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min. Four ml of supernatant was transferred to a turbovap tube, which was then evaporated to dryness and the residue was reconstituted with 1 mL acetonitrile. This extract was transferred into a 1.5 mL glass auto-sampler vial for LC–MS/MS analysis after filtering through a 0.2 µm filter membrane. Water samples were extracted by liquid–liquid partitioning using dichloromethane (DCM). Briefly, 200 mL water was added to 500 mL separating funnel containing 10 g sodium chloride and shaken well. For separation of DCM layer, 50 mL DCM was added to the funnel and was shaken well for 1 min. The aqueous layer was repeatedly extracted with 50 mL DCM and all the DCM layers were pooled together and dried using anhydrous sodium sulfate. The dried layer was finally reconstituted to 1 mL with acetonitrile and filtered through a 0.2 µm filter membrane before the extract was transferred into a 1.5 mL glass auto-sampler vial for LC–MS/MS analysis.
Quantification was performed in Waters LC/MS/MS, positive ESI mode with a C18, 5 µm (4.6 × 250 mm) column. The mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile: water (50:50) with 0.5% formic acid. A Tandem Quadrupole Detector (TQD) Acquity (Waters, USA) with Electrospray Ionization Interface (ESI) was used for the confirmation of the analyte. The analytes in a chromatogram were identified based on the retention time, precursor/product ion combination (Table 1 and Fig. 2). The standardized instrument conditions were source temperature at 150°C, capillary voltage at 3.5 kV, optimum column temperature at 30°C, and desolvation temperature at 500°C, desolvation gas flow at 1100 L/h, cone gas flow at 50 L/h, and the collision gas flow at 0.18 mL/minute. The flow rate was set at 0.5 mL/minute with an injected volume of 10 μL and working standards of 0.5 and 1.0 μg/mL were used. The calibration curves were obtained using standard solutions at 0.025, 0.055, 0.075, and 0.1 ppm (Fig. 3). Recovery assay was conducted at three levels of fortification at 0.05, 0.25, 0.5 ppm for soil and 0.0025, 0.005, and 0.01 ppm for water, with an acceptable range of recovery between 70–120%, with relative standard deviation at RSD < 20%. The Limit of Detection (LOD) and the Limit of Quantification (LOQ), values for water and soil were 0.001 ppm and 0.0025 ppm and 0.025 ppm and 0.05 ppm respectively. The physicochemical properties of the experimental soil were (Mean ± SD), pH (7.83 ± 0.74), electrical conductivity (0.22 ± 0.07 dS/m), water holding capacity (71.8 ± 16.81%), and bulk density (1.65 ± 0.11 g/cm3).
Results and Discussion
Although the Cauvery delta region is a protected agricultural zone, short-duration rice varieties and increased pest infestations have led to the extensive use of pesticides along this region. The results of the study found no detectable residues at concentrations above LOD in the water-soil systems. The standard curves demonstrated good linearity for calibration curves (r2 > 0.989) (Fig. 3). The average retention time of acetamiprid, thiacloprid, imidacloprid, thiamethoxam, and clothianidin in water and soil were 6.61 ± 0.03, 7.66 ± 0.03, 6.68 ± 0.05, 5.70 ± 0.06, 6.31 ± 0.05 and 6.87 ± 0.16, 6.26 ± 3.07, 6.66 ± 0.03, and 5.84 ± 0.42, 6.63 ± 0.24 respectively.
The Cauvery delta region experiences a mean annual temperature of 28°C while soaring up to 43°C in summer. The high elevated temperatures and the prolonged exposure of the top agricultural soil to UV radiations readily results in photolytic degradation, thus preventing their accumulation and load (Op de Beeck et al. 2017). Further, the higher microbial activity in the delta soil also facilitates rapid microbial degradation of the residues (Sabourmoghaddam et al. 2015). Few studies on neonicotinoids from the United States during 1999–2015 showed detection frequencies below 20% (Craddock et al. 2019). Similarly, soil samples collected from 25 commercial fields exposed to seed treatments in southwestern Ontario, Canada recorded a mean neonicotinoid residue of 5.59 ng/g in the parent soil and 71.17 ng/g in the soil dust (Limay-Rios et al. 2016). A Canadian study by Schaafsma et al. (2015) reported residues of clothianidin and thiamethoxam in 100 and 98.7% of the water samples associated with maize production. Numerous studies have also shown variable concentrations of neonicotinoids in surface waters. Long-term water monitoring studies have reported neonicotinoid contamination for average surface water at 0.13 μg/l (n = 19) (Morrissey et al. 2015), while wetlands surrounded by agricultural fields reported arithmetic mean concentrations at 0.007 μg/L (Smalling et al. 2015). Likewise, the average imidacloprid concentrations in seven streams at Eastern Hemlock forests were reported at 0.067 μg/L (Benton et al. 2016), while in maize fields the average concentration of clothianidin in groundwater was recorded at 0.060 μg/L (de Perre et al. 2015). A study by Schaafsma et al. (2015) reported arithmetic mean residues of clothianidin at 0.002 μg/L and thiamethoxam at 0.001 μg/L in surface water around the maize fields in Canada. In yet another study, thiamethoxam was recorded in pollen and nectar of wildflowers of Heracleum sphondylium and Papaver rhoeas at 86 ng/g and 64 ng/g respectively (Botias et al. 2016). Some studies have also reported higher residues of neonicotinoids in agricultural fields coinciding with higher precipitation rates (Hladik and Kolpin 2016; Wood and Goulson 2017).
In the present study, the hydropedological characteristic of the soil aids in delta filtration, thus straining the degraded pollutants from the agricultural soil (Giorio et al. 2017; Dragon et al. 2019). The saturated delta soil and higher water solubility of the neonicotinoids enhance the leaching rate of the pollutants formerly degraded by photolysis and microbial activity. Higher leaching results in dispersion, followed by rapid vertical migration and infiltration. Since the farmers in the delta region depend on the monsoon for cultivation and during this time the soil is saturated, migration is high. During the wet periods, the leaching is maximized, and the pesticides rapidly percolate into the underground water table. The long-wet season of the delta region also facilitates this migration, thus recording less persistence of the residues in the given environmental matrix. Since the underground water resources are shielded from photolysis, the residues accumulate in the groundwater threatening human life (Op de Beeck et al. 2017). Only limited studies are available on groundwater contamination by neonicotinoids (Mineau and Palmer 2013; Mineau 2019; Blanchoud et al. 2019). Hence, research incorporating pesticide fate models are essential to determine the degradation process and infiltration rate of neonicotinoids, followed by their persistence in the groundwater to divulge the scientific gaps.
Conclusion
The study infers that the persistence and migration of pesticides vary based on the agro-climatic characteristics of the region and the hydropedological conditions of the water-soil systems. Hence, it is essential to determine the counteracting environmental processes and the pathways that facilitate rapid degradation. Given that these compounds can easily be mobilized into the environment, the below LOD values illustrate the effectiveness of pesticide removal by delta filtration, which needs further research. However, our study raises the concern of possible vertical migration and infiltration of the residues into the soil aquifers that may contaminate the groundwater resources. Since the Cauvery delta region is the rice bowl of South India, this region needs frequent monitoring of any residual contamination in both the agricultural matrix and groundwater resources.
References
Anastassiades M, Lehotay SJ, Stajnbaher D, Schenck FJ (2003) Fast and easy multiresidue method employing acetonitrile extraction/ partitioning and dispersive solid phase extraction for the determination of pesticide residues in produce. J AOAC Int 86(2):412–431
Benton EP, Grant JF, Mueller TC, Webster RJ, Nicholls RJ (2016) Consequences of imidacloprid treatments for hemlock woolly adelgid on stream water quality in the southern Appalachians. For Ecol Manag 360:152–158
Blanchoud H, Schott C, Tallec G, QueyrelW, Gallois N, Habets F, ViennotP, Ansart P, Desportes A, Tournebize J, Puech T (2019) How Should Agricultural Practices Be Integrated to Understand and Simulate Long-Term Pesticide Contamination in the Seine River Basin? In: N. Flipo, P. Labadie, L Lestel (eds) The Seine River Basin. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, vol 90, pp 141–162
Bonmatin J-M, Giorio C, Girolami V, Goulson D, Kreutzweiser DP, Krupke C, Liess M, Long E, Marzaro M, Mitchell EAD, Noome DA, Simon-Delso N, Tapparo A (2015) Environmental fate and exposure; neonicotinoids and fipronil. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(1):35–67
Botias C, David A, Hill EM, Goulson D (2016) Contamination of wild plants near neonicotinoid seed-treated crops, and implications for non-target insects. Sci Total Environ 566–567:269–278
Chagnon M, Kreutzweiser D, Mitchell EAD, Morrissey CA, Noome DA, van der Sluijs JP (2015) Risks of large-scale use of systemic insecticides to ecosystem functioning and services. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:119–134
Chan DSW, Prosser RS, Raine R-G, NE, (2019) Assessment of risk to hoary squash bees (Peponapispruinosa) and other ground-nesting bees from systemic insecticides in agricultural soil. Sci Rep 9:11870
Cox C (2001) Insecticide factsheet—imidacloprid. J Pestic Reform 21:15–21
Craddock HA, Huang D, Turner PC, Quiros-Alcala L, Payne-Sturges DC (2019) Trends in neonicotinoid pesticide residues in food and water in the United States, 1999–2015. Environ Health 18:7
dePerre C, Murphy TM, Lydy MJ (2015) Fate and effects of clothianidin in fields using conservation practices. Environ Toxicol Chem 34(2):258–265
Dragon K, Drozdzynski D, Gorski J, Kruc R (2019) The migration of pesticide residues in groundwater at a bank filtration site (Krajkowo well field, Poland). Environ Earth Sci 78:593
Elbert A, Haas M, Springer B, Thielert W, Nauen R (2008) Applied aspects of neonicotinoid uses in crop protection. Pest Manag Sci 64(11):1099–1105
Giorio C, Safer A, Sanchez-Bayo F et al (2017) An update of the Worldwide Integrated Assessment (WIA) on systemic insecticides. Part 1: new molecules, metabolism, fate, and transport. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:11716–11748
Gunal AC, Erkmen B, Pacal E et al (2020) Sub-lethal effects of imidacloprid on nile tilapia (Oreochromisniloticus). Water Air Soil Pollut 231:4
Hladik ML, Kolpin DW (2016) First national-scale reconnaissance of neonicotinoid insecticides in streams across the USA. Environ Chem 13:12–20
Holtswarth JN, Rowland FE, Puglis HJ et al (2019) Effects of the neonicotinoid insecticide clothianidin on southern leopard frog (Rana sphenocephala) tadpole behavior. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 103(5):717–722
Hooper MJ, Ankley GT, Cristol DA, Maryoung LA, Noyes PD, Pinkerton KE (2013) Interactions between chemical and climate stressors: a role for mechanistic toxicology in assessing climate change risks. Environ Toxicol Chem 32(1):32–48
Jurado A, Walther M, Diaz-Cruz MS (2019) Occurrence, fate and environmental risk assessment of the organic microcontaminants included in the Watch Lists set by EU Decisions 2015/495 and 2018/840 in the groundwater of Spain. Sci Total Environ 663:285–296
Karmakar R, Singh SB, Kulshrestha G (2006) Persistence and transformation of thiamethoxam, a neonicotinoid insecticide, in soil of different agroclimatic zones of India. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 76(3):400–406
Leiva JA, Nkedi-Kizza P, Morgan KT, Kadyampakeni DM (2017) Imidacloprid transport and sorption nonequilibrium in single and multilayered columns of Immokalee fine sand. PLoS ONE 12(8):e0183767
Limay-Rios V, Forero LG, Xue YG, Smith J, Baute T, Schaafsma A (2016) Neonicotinoid insecticide residues in soil dust and associated parent soil in fields with a history of seed treatment use on crops in southwestern Ontario. Environ Toxicol Chem 35(2):303–310
Mineau P (2019) Impacts of Neonics in New York Water. Their Use and Threats to the State’s Aquatic Ecosystems. Technical report. Pierre Mineau Consulting. 1–18
Mineau P, Palmer C (2013) The impact of the nation’s most widely used insecticides on birds. American Bird Conservancy, USA
Morrissey CA, Mineau P, Devries JH, Sanchex-Bayo F, Liess M, Cavallaro MC, Liber K (2015) Neonicotinoid contamination of global surface waters and associated risk to aquatic invertebrates: a review. Environ Int 74:291–303
Mortl M, Kereki O, Darvas B, Klatyik S, Vehovszky A, Gyori J, Szekacs A (2016) Study on soil mobility of two neonicotinoid insecticides. J Chem 4546584
Op de Beeck L, Verheyen J, Olsen K, Stoks R (2017) Negative effects of pesticides under global warming can be counteracted by a higher degradation rate and thermal adaptation. J Appl Ecol 54:1847–1855
Pietrzak D, Kania J, Kmiecik E, Malina G, Wątor K (2020) Fate of selected neonicotinoid insecticides in soil–water systems: Current state of the art and knowledge gaps. Chemosphere 255:126981
Reynoso EC, Torres E, Bettazzi F, Palchetti I (2019) Trends and perspectives in immunsensors for determination of currently-used pesticides: the case of glyphosate, organophosphates, and neonicotinoids. Biosensors 9(1):20
Rundlof M, Andersson GKS, Bommarco R, Fries I, Hederstrom V, Herbertsson L, Jonsson O, Klatt BK, Pedersen TR, Yourstone J, Smith HG (2015) Seed coating with a neonicotinoid insecticide negatively affects wild bees. Nature 521:77–80
Sabourmoghaddam N, Zakaria MP, Omar D (2015) Evidence for the microbial degradation of imidacloprid in soils of Cameron highlands. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci 14:82–188
Sattler C, Schrader J, Farkas VM et al (2018) Pesticide diversity in rice growing areas of Northern Vietnam. Paddy Water Environ 16(2):339–352
Schaafsma A, Limay-Rios V, Baute T, Smith J, Xue Y (2015) Neonicotinoid insecticide residues in surface water and soil associated with commercial maize (corn) fields in southwestern Ontario. PLoS ONE 10(2):e0118139
Smalling KL, Reeves R, Muths E, Vandever M, Battaglin WA, Hladik ML, Pierce CL (2015) Pesticide concentrations in frog tissue and wetland habitats in a landscape dominated by agriculture. Sci Total Environ 502:80–90
Wood TJ, Goulson D (2017) The environmental risks of neonicotinoid pesticides: a review of the evidence post 2013. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:17285–17325
Zhang C, Tian D, Yi XH, Zhang T, Ruan J, Wu R, Chen C, Huang M, Ying GG (2019) Occurrence, distribution and seasonal variation of five neonicotinoid insecticides in surface water and sediment of the Pearl Rivers, South China. Chemosphere 217:437–446
Acknowledgements
The author(s) thank the University Grants Commission, Government of India for the funds. We acknowledge Tamilnadu Agricultural University for the analytical support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Menon, M., Mohanraj, R. & Sujata, W. Monitoring of Neonicotinoid Pesticides in Water-Soil Systems Along the Agro-Landscapes of the Cauvery Delta Region, South India. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 106, 1065–1070 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-021-03233-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-021-03233-4