Abstract
The urokinase plasminogen activator receptor-associated protein (uPARAP/Endo180) is already known to be a key collagen receptor involved in collagen internalization and degradation in mesenchymal cells and some macrophages. It is one of the four members of the mannose receptor family along with a macrophage mannose receptor (MMR), a phospholipase lipase receptor (PLA2R), and a dendritic receptor (DEC-205). As a clathrin-dependent endocytic receptor for collagen or large collagen fragments as well as through its association with urokinase (uPA) and its receptor (uPAR), uPARAP/Endo180 takes part in extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling, cell chemotaxis and migration under physiological (tissue homeostasis and repair) and pathological (fibrosis, cancer) conditions. Recent advances that have shown an expanded contribution of this multifunctional protein across a broader range of biological processes, including vascular biology and innate immunity, are summarized in this paper. It has previously been demonstrated that uPARAP/Endo180 assists in lymphangiogenesis through its capacity to regulate the heterodimerization of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3). Moreover, recent findings have demonstrated that it is also involved in the clearance of collectins and the regulation of the immune system, something which is currently being studied as a biomarker and a therapeutic target in a number of cancers.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
In eukaryotic cells, the extracellular and subcellular localization of a protein is tightly controlled and closely linked to its functions. In fact, distinct extracellular and intracellular compartments provide specific chemical environments (for instance pH and redox conditions) that are fundamental to potential interactions with partners or substrates. Accordingly, the management of protein subcellular localization plays a vital role in protein regulation. In this context, endocytosis is a key biological process, through which cells internalize macromolecules and cell surface proteins. The cellular uptake through one of the multiple endocytic pathways is followed by routing through the endosomal network to a final destination. Cargoes can be recycled back to the plasma membrane, sent to the trans-Golgi network (TGN) via retrograde traffic, or sorted to the lysosome where they are degraded [1, 2]. This endocytic process defines the quality of cell response to extracellular stimuli by regulating cell surface receptor clearance. It additionally contributes to tissue remodeling and cell–matrix interaction through a controlled uptake of extracellular matrix (ECM) components and integrins, their most abundant cell surface receptors [3]. As a major ECM constituent, different types of collagen are critical for tissue architecture, and form a scaffold for cell adhesion and migration. Together, these play a crucial role in regulating cell functions during embryonic development and physiopathology. Among endocytic receptors, the urokinase plasminogen activator receptor-associated protein (uPARAP) or Endo180, the product of the MRC2 gene, is a master regulator of collagen turnover. However, beyond its collagen binding and internalization functions, it has been demonstrated that uPARAP is assigned other functions related to cell migration involved in tissue repair (wound healing) [4, 5], cancer progression [6, 7], and more recently in pathological lymphangiogenesis [8]. In this review, the main features of uPARAP/Endo180 will be presented along with its newly identified functions which are subsequently discussed.
uPARAP/Endo180 discovery: two names, one protein
A study on membrane proteins, conducted by Isacke et al. in 1990, [9] discovered a 180 kDa protein in cultured human fibroblasts thereafter referred to as p180. The largest part of this new protein (70% to 80% of the total) was found to be present in the membrane of intracellular vesicles, which suggested that this transmembrane protein undergoes internalization and de facto enters the endocytosis circuit. It was observed that its membrane exposure could be restored, indicating that it was possible for p180 to be internalized and then, at a later stage, recycled back to the surface. During this process, the protein remained unaltered, making it a constitutively internalized and recycled protein. Similarities were then established with other well-known membrane proteins, such as the transferrin receptor (TfR), previously established as a prototype for clathrin-dependent endocytosis [10, 11]. The protein was initially synthesized as a 150 kDa single polypeptide backbone, then matured into its final 180 kDa protein form by glycosylation (N-linked carbohydrates) and the addition of neuraminidase sensitive terminal sialic acid residues. It is worth noting that no less than 75 kDa was exposed to the extracellular medium [9, 12]. This p180 protein was also found to be a substrate for the Protein Kinase C (PKC), targeting putative serine residues, as found on the TfR [13, 14]. Consequently, K. Wu et al. [15] later identified the p180 murine ortholog, as a carbohydrate calcium-dependent binding protein. Based on sequence similarities, it was, therefore, classified as a member of the mannose receptor (MR) family.
In 2000, further investigations of human p180 protein biological functions were conducted, simultaneously, by two independent research groups. Both studies shed light on the high sequence homology between human p180 cDNA and its murine ortholog, confirming its classification as a definitive and ultimate mannose receptor family member [12, 16]. The initial study investigated the cell distribution and endocytic properties of human p180, and renamed it Endo180. Gene mapping localized the Endo180 encoding gene on the human 17q chromosome which was seen to be expressed in macrophages, stromal and endothelial cells [12]. A second study reported that only a fraction of the protein was engaged in a trimolecular non-covalent complex formation with the urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) and its receptor (uPAR), both related to the plasminogen activation cascade. For this reason, it was renamed the urokinase-plasminogen activator receptor-associated protein (uPARAP). uPARAP/Endo180 is a receptor in a majority of type V collagen and to a lesser extent for other collagen including types I and IV. After binding with uPARAP, collagen is endocytosed into clathrin-coated vesicles and routed to early endosomes where it is dissociated from its receptor, following which the uPARAP is recycled back to the cell surface, while the collagen fragments are directed towards the lysosomal compartment for degradation [16]. In addition to its common appellations, the protein may also be found under the name of CLEC13E, KIAA0709, CD280 or TEM9. Despite sharing some similarities with other MR family members, uPARAP/Endo180 displays unique properties related to cell membrane-associated protein trafficking and cell migration that are discussed as follows.
uPARAP/Endo180 domains and structure
Based on its protein sequence, uPARAP/Endo180 has been assigned to the clearly defined mannose receptor family, making it the final member of the group (Fig. 1). This endocytic receptor family is made up of four type-1 transmembrane proteins: (i) the eponymous family founding member, macrophage mannose receptor (MMR, encoded by the gene MRC1) [14, 15], (ii) the phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R, encoded by the gene PLA2R1) [16, 17], (iii) dendritic receptor (DEC-205/gp200-MR6, encoded by the gene LY75) [17, 18] and (iv) uPARAP/Endo180 (encoded by the gene MRC2) [19]. MMR and uPARAP/Endo180 are the most similar members of the group and share an ability to bind and internalize collagen [20]. From the N-terminus to C-terminus, their extracellular regions are made of a peptide signal, a cysteine-rich domain (Cys-R), a fibronectin type-II (FNII) domain and several C-type lectin-like domains (CTLD) that are repeated 8 or 10 times in tandem. Within its transmembrane region, the cytoplasmic tail of uPARAP/Endo180 is responsible for receptor internalization involving a critical dihydrophobic Leu1468/Val1469 motif mediating the recruitment of the receptor into clathrin-coated pits [21, 22]. Although conserved tyrosine in a consensus sequence (FxNxxY) is crucial for the endocytosis of MMR, PLA2R and DEC-205, this residue has no effect on uPARAP/Endo180 internalization [21]. However, an acidic residue (E1464) is involved in uPARAP/Endo180, targeting endosomes. Given the lack of the three acidic motifs at the site (EDE present in DEC-205, a motif known to target protein to a late endosomal/lysosomal compartment), uPARAP/Endo180 is targeted to early endosomes, as is the case for the MMR [21, 23]. uPARAP/Endo180 is rapidly recycled (5 to 20 min) [7, 24] and is a relatively stable protein with an average half-life of 24 h [9]. Beyond the residues involved in protein internalization, the tail contains several phosphorylation sites whose function remains unclear. Constitutively internalized, uPARAP/Endo180 is able to internalize its ligand, another characteristic it shares with the MMR, or it simply acts as a signaling pathway modulator as described below [22].
The four N-terminal domains (Cys-R, FNII, CTLD1 and CTLD2) form an area known as the ligand-binding region (LBR), which makes the protein able to bind collagens and carbohydrates (Fig. 1). The Cys-R domain of uPARAP/Endo180 has a unique conformation that differentiates it from the typical β-trefoil fold characteristic of other MR family members [25]. Some studies using single particle electron microscopy revealed that this Cys-R domain intimately contacts the CTLD2 adopting either a L-shape, which moves the two domains closer together, or a more open conformation depending on the pH [26, 27]. One study, however, using small-angle X-ray scattering, challenged the existence of such a structural modification [28], while a second study confirmed the findings, albeit to a lesser extent and with less impact of pH on the open conformation. In this study, both CTLD1 and CTLD2 domains adopt a characteristic tridimensional CTLD structure at the cell surface (at neutral pH), with two Ca2 + in the CTLD2 and were, therefore, able to bind carbohydrate molecules [29] such as mannose, fucose and N-acetylglucosamine [30], as well as highly glycosylated collagens including type IV collagen [31]. Once it had been internalized in the cell by endosomes, uPARAP/Endo180 found itself in an acid environment with a low Ca2 + concentration and became protonated. This modification induced a CTLD2 conformational change and the release of the bound molecules. It is believed that other mechanisms of collagen release exist but this still needs to be elucidated [21, 29, 30].
The most conserved extracellular domain in the MR family is FNII, also present in some other proteins such as matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs: MMP-2 and MMP-9) [24]. It is the principal site of collagen binding in MMR and uPARAP/Endo180 [20]. Although the LBR structure is important for FNII function, it is not necessarily impacted by the conformational modification described above [28, 31]. Of the 28 existing collagen types, uPARAP/Endo180 is the one that is able to bind fibrillar collagens including types I, II and V through its FNII domain. Binding to the glycosylated basement membrane-associated type IV collagen, on the other hand, is enhanced by the CTLD2 domain [24, 31,32,33,34]. Interestingly, this FNII domain was also seen to be involved in the interaction between uPARAP/Endo180 and the uPAR/pro-uPA complex (see below). It is worth mentioning that interaction with type V collagen, prevented this complex formation [16]. Besides these important roles of FNII and CTLD2 domains of the LBR, CTLD4 contributed to the interaction of uPARAP/Endo180 with CD147/Basigin/EMMPRIN, a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily participating in tumor development [35] (Fig. 1). These data highlight the capacity of uPARAP to interact with multiple cell-associated proteins.
uPARAP/Endo180: an endocytic receptor of collagen and collectins
The ECM turnover involved in homeostatic maintenance and tissue remodeling takes place under physiological (embryonic development, wound healing, tissue repair) and pathological conditions (cancer, inflammation) (Fig. 2), and uPARAP/Endo180 plays its part in this [36], also contributing to the intracellular degradation of collagen with its ability to internalize its fragments. Consistently internalized at the cell steady state, uPARAP/Endo180 is a key protein in the non-phagocytic collagen uptake pathway that routes it to the lysosomal compartment (Fig. 3). As mentioned above, the low endosomal pH triggers receptor-ligand disruption, leading to the receptor recycling back to the membrane and ligand degradation [37, 38]. The clathrin-dependent endocytosis, through which uPARAP/Endo180 is transported into the cell, engulfs proteins resulting in an endocytic vesicle (endosome) with a diameter of less than 200 nm [39]. Collagen fibrils are oversized and, therefore, cannot be carried into the cytosol in a clathrin-dependent way [40]. Due to this size constraint, collagen fibrils have to be processed beforehand and then cleaved into smaller units. Composed of insoluble fibres, collagens are resistant to most proteolysis mechanisms. Only an insignificant number of MMPs (MMP1, 2, 8, 13, 16) and cathepsins (mainly cathepsin K) display collagenolytic activities. MT1-MMP (MMP14) also exerts a collagenolytic activity with a key role in the regulation of collagen homeostasis in mice [41, 42]. These enzymatic activities lead to increased protein solubility that promotes the accessibility of cleavage sites to other collagenases. Thereby reduced in moieties, collagen fragments bound by the uPARAP/Endo180 LBR domain can be uptaken by the cell, routed first to the early endosomal compartment where they are dissociated from uPARAP/Endo180, and then to the late endosome/lysosomal compartment for intracellular degradation [24, 37, 38]. An alternative endocytic pathway of collagens relies on phagocytosis, which is uPARAP/Endo180 independent (Fig. 3) [43]. The key roles of uPARAP/Endo180 in collagen remodeling under physiological and pathological conditions are examined as follows.
Intriguingly, it has recently been demonstrated that uPARAP/Endo180 participates in the uptake and intracellular degradation of collectins, C-type lectins that contain triple-helical collagen-like domains. Collectins belong to the group of defense collagens such as mannose-binding lectin (MBL) and surfactant protein D (SP-D). Their expression is enhanced during infection, inflammation and fibrosis. Following tissue injury, collectins are temporarily deposited in extravascular sites where they manage (either promoting or limiting) inflammation and immune response [44]. The capability of uPARAP/Endo180 to uptake collectins is remarkably not shared by the MMR, the alternative endocytic receptor of collagen. The collectin uptake depends on specific residues within FNII domain that are not involved in collagen uptake and are absent in MMR. It can also rely on interaction with the CTLD2 for SP-D but not for MBL. This interesting study thus assigned a novel role for uPARAP/Endo180 in immunity. The demonstration of uPARAP/endo180-mediated clearance of collectins by fibroblasts in injured tissue, has extended the number of previously observed biological functions of this endocytic receptor to immune-regulatory roles [45, 46].
uPARAP/Endo180: a member of a trimolecular complex with the urokinase-plasminogen activator (uPA) and its receptor (uPAR)
uPARAP/Endo180 acts, on certain cell types, as a co-receptor for the glycosyl phosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchored uPA-uPAR complex [47]. The uPA plays an indirect role in ECM degradation by contributing to the plasminogen activation cascade, converting plasminogen into plasmin that in turn activates pro-uPA, leading to a positive feed-back loop [48, 49]. Plasmin can, independently, breakdown numerous ECM components and further enhance degradation by activating several MMPs [50, 51]. This cascade of activation is negatively controlled by plasminogen activator inhibitors (PAI-1 and PAI-2), which inhibit uPA proteolytic activity and promote uPAR-uPA-PAI complex internalization [51,52,53]. In addition, uPARAP/Endo180 is requisite for the activation of signaling pathways when migrating cells sense the uPA gradient. Its expression promotes uPA-mediated filopodia formation and the chemotactic response towards an uPA gradient. The uPA-uPAR signaling pathway regulates the activation of two small Ras GTPases, Rac1 and Cdc42. Although the activation of this depends on uPARAP/Endo180 being expressed, it is independent of its internalization. Nonetheless, random cell motility evoked by uPARAP/Endo180 relies on receptor constitutive internalization, while the chemotaxis does not [47]. This dissimilarity may be explained by the fact that uPAR constitutive endocytosis is a clathrin-independent mechanism, unlike uPARAP/Endo180 which is not [50]. The uPARAP/Endo180, therefore, appears to be a versatile cell migration protein involved in ECM remodeling and in the regulation of uPAR/uPARAP-mediated cell chemotaxis (Fig. 3).
uPARAP/Endo180, a regulator of a mechanotransduction pathway in cell contractility
The significance of uPARAP/Endo180 for mechanotransduction pathways that promote cell contraction has been well documented and it relies on the endocytic localization of uPARAP. uPARAP/Endo180-containing endosomes regulate contractile signals though the small GTPase RhoA, which, in turn, activates Rho-Rho kinase (ROCK) that phosphorylates a myosin light chain 2 (MLC2). Activation of the Rho–ROCK–MLC2 pathway leads to cell tail retraction, cellular junction remodeling and accordingly promotes cell migration. Notably, this effect has been reported to be independent of uPA-uPAR-uPARAP/Endo180 trimolecular complex formation [54] (Fig. 3).
uPARAP/Endo180, a VEGFR-2/VEGFR-3 pathway regulator in lymphatic endothelial cell migration
The expression of uPAPAR/Endo180 by blood endothelial cells has already been identified in previous studies, although its role in vascular biology has only recently been documented. The results from this study unexpectedly revealed that uPARAP/Endo180 interferes with two vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3) in lymphatic endothelial cells (LEC) [8]. These data shed new light on a crucial role for this endocytic receptor in lymphangiogenesis in the formation of new lymphatic vessels associated with cancer progression and metastatic spread to lymph nodes and distant organs [55,56,57,58,59]. Vascular endothelial growth factor type C (VEGF-C) is the main lymphangiogenic factor that acts through its receptor (VEGFR-3) and leads to cell proliferation and migration towards the VEGF-C secretion source [47, 60, 61]. Localized at the cell leading edge toward VEGF-C gradient, uPARAP/Endo180 is essential for chemotactic response and cell guidance, as already described in non-lymphatic cell lines [47, 54, 62]. Silencing uPARAP/Endo180 in LEC was seen to drastically impair VEGF-C mediated cellular migration revealing that uPARAP/Endo180 may not regulate the direction of cell migration by itself, but, in fact, act as the first cog in the gearing represented here as an intracellular signaling network. Interestingly, in VEGF-C-stimulated LECs, uPARAP/Endo180 prevented the heterodimerization of VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3. By acting as a gatekeeper between these two tyrosine kinase receptors, uPARAP/Endo180 contributes to modulating the downstream VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3 signaling pathways. The reduced VEGFR-2/VEGFR-3 heterodimerization induced by uPARAP/Endo180 decreased VEGFR-2 signaling which, in turn, promoted the VEGFR-3-induced c-Jun N-terminal Kinase (JNK) Crk-II, and paxillin signaling pathway. The intertwining of these three proteins maintained the activate state of the Rho GTPase Rac, regulating cell migration (Fig. 3). Following deciphering of the uPARAP/Endo180 driven-cellular signaling pathway, related-phenotypes in experimental in vivo models were observed. In uPARAP-/- mouse, the lymphangiogenic response was enhanced when compared to the wild-type littermates, leading to an hyperbranched and dilated lymphatic vasculature with increased drainage capability [8].
uPARAP/Endo180 in health and aging
Controlled ECM degradation is of central importance during embryonic development, growth and tissue repair. Collagen degradation is governed by an extracellular MMPs-mediated proteolytic pathway and an intracellular lysosomal degradation depending on uPARAP/Endo180-mediated endocytosis. Together with MMPs, uPARAP/Endo180 plays a key role in collagen clearance in normal physiology (tissue homeostasis and repair) [7, 63]. In healthy organisms, uPARAP/Endo180 is expressed by a restricted number of cell types, being mainly produced by mesenchymal cell types (fibroblasts, chondrocytes, osteoblasts and osteocytes), some macrophages and endothelial cells [12, 32, 64]. This receptor is largely limited to tissues characterized by an active matrix turnover such as the skin during wound healing [4] and in bone (Fig. 2), where uPARAP/Endo180 plays an important role in embryonic development and homeostasis. Mutations in the MRC2 gene (c.2904_2905delAG and c.1906 T > C) are responsible for the Crooked Tail Syndrome observed in Belgian Blue cattle, which are characterized by increased muscle mass, a thickset head, scoliosis and short, but straight, fore limbs, [65, 66]. In mice, uPARAP/Endo180 genetic ablation leads to a significant decrease in the length of long bones associated with a trabecular bones reduction. Such impact is even more pronounced when associated with either a MMP-2 [67] or MT-MMP-1 [64] deficiency. In addition, implicated in this is uPARAP/Endo180, together with MMP-13 in the reversal phase of bone remodeling in humans [68] (Fig. 2). In mouse lungs, uPARAP/Endo180 deficiency leads to a higher pulmonary elastance related to impaired collagen internalization by pulmonary fibroblasts [69]. The collagen turnover decreases during the life span of mice and is associated with reduced cell-mediated collagen uptake and degradation by uPARAP/Endo180 with a reduction in expression from the MRC2 gene [70]. This impaired MRC2 expression contributes to age-related fibrosis (Fig. 2).
uPARAP/Endo180 in disease
Fibroblasts are the main producers of collagens, and their endocytic receptors are central to tissue fibrosis and tumor fibrosis, the production of which is referred to as the desmoplastic reaction. An upregulation of uPARAP/Endo180 production has been reported in activated fibroblasts adjacent to collagen deposition in the liver [71], kidneys [72] and pulmonary fibrosis [69]. In carcinoma, the most common type of cancer, uPARAP/Endo180 is not expressed by epithelial tumor cells, but, rather instead, by cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) within the tumor microenvironment [6]. The CAF-related uPARAP/endo180 implications in collagen remodeling and cancer progression has been well documented in the MMTV-PyMT breast cancer model [73]. uPARAP/Endo180 expressed by stromal cells associated with the cross-linking of collagen fibers by stromal-derived lysyl oxidase (LOX) regulates the migration of metastatic prostate cancer cells [74]. Interestingly, single-cell sequencing data revealed that the collagen endocytic receptor is produced, for the most part, by a specific CAF subset characterized by the expression of matrix components and matrix-modifying enzymes [75]. Findings from this study demonstrated the genetic ablation of uPARAP/Endo180 affects CAF contractility and viability, thereby limiting tumor growth and metastasis (Fig. 2). These data further support the pro-tumorigenic effects of matrix remodeling a CAF subset [76]. This differentiates it from other cancers where uPARAP/Endo180 can be produced by the cancer cells themselves and is the case in sarcomas such as osteosarcoma [35], some glioblastoma subsets [77] and triple-negative basal-like breast cancers [78]. Interestingly, in these types of cancer, epithelial tumor cells subjected by the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) often express higher levels of uPARAP/Endo180 [78]. The uPARAP/Endo180 expression could be dysregulated through the TGF-β pathway [77,78,79,80]. Importantly, and in contrast to its pro-tumor effect, uPARAP/Endo180 was seen to act as an EMT suppressor, when it binds the high glycosylated CD147 by its CTLD4 (Fig. 1). Indeed, either a downregulation of uPARAP/Endo180 or CD147, an anti-uPARAP/Endo180 antibody targeting CTLD4, or a dominant-negative GST-CTLD4 chimeric protein, promoted epithelial cell scattering, decreased E-cadherin and disrupted the adherens junctions [35].
Conclusions and perspectives
Collectively, the data highlighted the pivotal role played by uPARAP/Endo180 in the extracellular matrix turnover, in fibrotic conditions and in the spread of malignant cancers [24, 73]. The significance of the soluble ectodomain of uPARAP/Endo180 as a biomarker for metastatic breast cancer has also been highlighted. The concentration of soluble uPARAP/Endo180 in plasma was found to be higher in patients displaying metastatic breast cancer than in patients with localized breast cancer, but lower in patients treated with bisphosphonates. This finding suggests that it could be used to monitor the effectiveness of this treatment [81]. A clinical study is ongoing to assess the efficacy of soluble uPARAP/Endo180 in a number of body fluids and urinary tissue factors as biomarkers of early malignancy in pancreatic cystic lesions (NCT036793). Further investigations still need to be carried out to assess the clinical interest of uPARAP/Endo180 as a biomarker for various cancer types.
In a therapeutic context, a monoclonal neutralizing antibody targeting uPARAP/Endo180 (epitope located in FNII) showed anti-tumor efficacy against experimental osteosarcoma (NCTC-2472 sarcoma) in mice. The strong protective effect observed in this model against bone destruction looks promising for establishing new treatment for this disease [82]. Another anti-uPARAP/Endo180 antibody (epitope located within the first three N-terminal domains of uPARAP, more particularly in either the CysR domain or CTLD1) has been conjugated to a drug (monomethyl auristatin E) [83]. Interestingly, a specific cytotoxicity in uPARAP-positive cancer cell lines of glioblastoma, sarcoma and leukemic origin was observed in vitro. The efficacy of this treatment was confirmed in vivo using a xenograft mouse model with human uPARAP-positive leukemic cells. Complete recovery of all mice, with no recurrent tumor growth or any observable adverse event was observed following intravenous administration of the antibody–drug conjugate [83]. The key implication of uPARAP in bone remodeling also suggested that it could be a target in metastatic bone disease caused by the metastatic spread of a primary tumor (such as, for instance, breast, prostate, lung and renal cancers). A mathematical model for the dysregulation of the uPARAP/Endo180 network (through a TGFβ signaling pathway in tumor and osteoblastic cells) has been developed to demonstrate its implication in bone destruction. This model could assist in future drug development in the context of metastatic bone disease [84]. The recently identified uPARAP/Endo180-mediated fibroblast function in the turnover of collectins supports the innovative concept that fibroblasts can regulate the innate immune system by evacuating collectins from injured tissue [45]. This novel immunological function of uPARAP/Endo180 offers new opportunities to investigate uPARAP/Endo180 contribution in various pathological conditions involving collectins (Fig. 2).
Beyond its role in collagen/collectin clearance, uPARAP/Endo180 increasingly appears as a membrane-associated molecule that interacts with multiple molecular partners. The current list of its interactors extends from the initial uPA-uPAR complex to EMMPRIN, and VEGF receptors [8]. Its unexpected implication in vascular biology is now emerging with a key role in lymphatic endothelial cell sprouting during pathological lymphangiogenesis. This recent discovery paves the way for future research in lymphatic biology and lymph node metastases. This protein could in particular offer new perspectives in the detection of and treatment of cancers and fibrotic disease. Further studies have yet to be carried out to take advantage of its potential in healthcare and, better understand and decipher its mechanism of action.
Data availability
Not applicable.
References
Mettlen M, Chen P-H, Srinivasan S et al (2018) Regulation of clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Annu Rev Biochem 87:871–896. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-062917-012644
Joseph JG, Liu AP (2020) Mechanical regulation of endocytosis: new insights and recent advances. Adv Biosyst 4:e1900278. https://doi.org/10.1002/adbi.201900278
De Franceschi N, Hamidi H, Alanko J et al (2015) Integrin traffic—the update. J Cell Sci 128:839–852. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.161653
Rohani MG, Chow Y-H, Razumova MV et al (2014) uPARAP function in cutaneous wound repair. PLoS One 9:e92660. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092660
Honardoust HA, Jiang G, Koivisto L et al (2006) Expression of Endo180 is spatially and temporally regulated during wound healing. Histopathology 49:634–648. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2559.2006.02559.x
Melander MC, Jürgensen HJ, Madsen DH et al (2015) The collagen receptor uPARAP/Endo180 in tissue degradation and cancer (review). Int J Oncol 47:1177–1188. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2015.3120
Jürgensen HJ, van Putten S, Nørregaard KS et al (2020) Cellular uptake of collagens and implications for immune cell regulation in disease. Cell Mol Life Sci 77:3161–3176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-020-03481-3
Durré T, Morfoisse F, Erpicum C et al (2018) uPARAP/Endo180 receptor is a gatekeeper of VEGFR-2/VEGFR-3 heterodimerisation during pathological lymphangiogenesis. Nat Commun 9:5178. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07514-1
Isacke CM, van der Geer P, Hunter T, Trowbridge IS (1990) p180, a novel recycling transmembrane glycoprotein with restricted cell type expression. Mol Cell Biol 10:2606–2618. https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.10.6.2606
Bleil JD, Bretscher MS (1982) Transferrin receptor and its recycling in HeLa cells. EMBO J 1:351–355. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1460-2075.1982.tb01173.x
Hopkins CR (1983) Intracellular routing of transferrin and transferrin receptors in epidermoid carcinoma A431 cells. Cell 35:321–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(83)90235-0
Sheikh H, Yarwood H, Ashworth A, Isacke CM (2000) Endo180, an endocytic recycling glycoprotein related to the macrophage mannose receptor is expressed on fibroblasts, endothelial cells and macrophages and functions as a lectin receptor. J Cell Sci 113:1021–1032
Woodgett JR, Hunter T, Gould KL (1987) Protein kinase C and its role in cell growth. Cell Membranes. Springer US, Boston, pp 215–340
Davis RJ, Meisner H (1987) Regulation of transferrin receptor cycling by protein kinase C is independent of receptor phosphorylation at serine 24 in Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts. J Biol Chem 262:16041–16047
Wu K, Yuan J, Lasky LA (1996) Characterization of a novel member of the macrophage mannose receptor type C lectin family. J Biol Chem 271:21323–21330
Behrendt N, Jensen ON, Engelholm LH et al (2000) A urokinase receptor-associated protein with specific collagen binding properties. J Biol Chem 275:1993–2002. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.275.3.1993
McKay PF, Imami N, Johns M et al (1998) The gp200-MR6 molecule which is functionally associated with the IL-4 receptor modulates B cell phenotype and is a novel member of the human macrophage mannose receptor family. Eur J Immunol 28:4071–4083. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199812)28:12%3c4071::AID-IMMU4071%3e3.0.CO;2-O
Jiang W, Swiggard WJ, Heufler C et al (1995) The receptor DEC-205 expressed by dendritic cells and thymic epithelial cells is involved in antigen processing. Nat Publ Group 375:151–155
Gupta GS, Gupta A, Gupta RK (2012) Animal lectins: form, function and clinical applications. Springer, Vienna
Jürgensen HJ, Johansson K, Madsen DH et al (2014) Complex determinants in specific members of the mannose receptor family govern collagen endocytosis. J Biol Chem 289:7935–7947. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.512780
East L, Isacke CM (2002) The mannose receptor family. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj 1572:364–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4165(02)00319-7
Howard MJ, Isacke CM (2002) The C-type lectin receptor Endo180 displays internalization and recycling properties distinct from other members of the mannose receptor family. J Biol Chem. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M203631200
Mahnke K, Guo M, Lee S et al (2000) The dendritic cell receptor for endocytosis, DEC-205, can recycle and enhance antigen presentation via major histocompatibility complex class II-positive lysosomal compartments. J Cell Biol 151:673–683. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.151.3.673
Wienke D, MacFadyen JR, Isacke CM (2003) Identification and characterization of the endocytic transmembrane glycoprotein Endo180 as a novel collagen receptor. Mol Biol Cell 14:3592–3604. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e02-12-0814
Yuan C, Huang JH, Liu M, Huang M (2015) Expression and crystallographic studies of the ligand-binding region of the human endocytic collagen receptor uPARAP. Acta Crystallographica Sect: F Struct Biol Commun 71:1442–1447. https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053230X15018944
Rivera-Calzada A, Robertson D, MacFadyen JR et al (2003) Three-dimensional interplay among the ligand-binding domains of the urokinase-plasminogen-activator-receptor-associated protein, Endo180. EMBO Rep 4:807–812. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.embor898
Boskovic J, Arnold JN, Stilion R et al (2006) Structural model for the mannose receptor family uncovered by electron microscopy of Endo180 and the mannose receptor. J Biol Chem 281:8780–8787. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M513277200
Paracuellos P, Briggs DC, Carafoli F et al (2015) Insights into collagen uptake by C-type mannose receptors from the crystal structure of Endo180 domains 1–4. Structure 23:2133–2142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2015.09.004
Yuan C, Jürgensen HJ, Engelholm LH et al (2016) Crystal structures of the ligand-binding region of uPARAP: effect of calcium ion binding. Biochem J 473:2359–2368. https://doi.org/10.1042/BCJ20160276
East L, Rushton S, Taylor ME, Isacke CM (2002) Characterization of sugar binding by the mannose receptor family member, Endo180. J Biol Chem 277:50469–50475. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M208985200
Jürgensen HJ, Madsen DH, Ingvarsen S et al (2011) A novel functional role of collagen glycosylation: Interaction with the endocytic collagen receptor uPARAP/ENDO180. J Biol Chem 286:32736–32748. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.266692
Ricard-Blum S (2011) The collagen family. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 3:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a004978
East L, McCarthy A, Wienke D et al (2003) A targeted deletion in the endocytic receptor gene Endo 180 results in a defect in collagen uptake. EMBO Rep 4:710–716. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.embor882
Engelholm LH, List K, Netzel-Arnett S et al (2003) uPARAP/Endo180 is essential for cellular uptake of collagen and promotes fibroblast collagen adhesion. J Cell Biol 160:1009–1015. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200211091
Rodriguez-Teja M, Gronau JH, Minamidate A et al (2015) Survival outcome and EMT suppression mediated by a lectin domain interaction of Endo180 and CD147. Mol Cancer Res 13:538–547. https://doi.org/10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-14-0344-T
Lu P, Takai K, Weaver VM, Werb Z (2011) Extracellular matrix degradation and remodeling in development and disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a005058
Kjøller L, Engelholm LH, Høyer-Hansen M et al (2004) uPARAP/endo180 directs lysosomal delivery and degradation of collagen IV. Exp Cell Res 293:106–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2003.10.008
Madsen DH, Ingvarsen S, Jürgensen HJ et al (2011) The non-phagocytic route of collagen uptake: a distinct degradation pathway. J Biol Chem 286:26996–27010. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.208033
Rejman J, Oberle V, Zuhorn IS, Hoekstra D (2004) Size-dependent internalization of particles via the pathways of clathrin-and caveolae-mediated endocytosis. Biochem J 377:159–169
Bancelin S, Aimé C, Gusachenko I et al (2014) Determination of collagen fibril size via absolute measurements of second-harmonic generation signals. Nat Commun 5:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5920
Ottani V, Martini D, Franchi M et al (2002) Hierarchical structures in fibrillar collagens. Micron 33:587–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-4328(02)00033-1
Zigrino P, Brinckmann J, Niehoff A et al (2016) Fibroblast-derived mmp-14 regulates collagen homeostasis in adult skin. J Invest Derm 136:1575–1583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2016.03.036
Sprangers S, Behrendt N, Engelholm L et al (2017) Phagocytosis of Collagen fibrils by fibroblasts in vivo is independent of the uPARAP/Endo180 receptor. J Cell Biochem 118:1590–1595. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.25821
Murugaiah V, Tsolaki AG, Kishore U (2020) Collectins: innate immune pattern recognition molecules. Lectin Host Infect Against Microb Infect 1204:75–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1580-4_4
Jürgensen HJ, Nørregaard KS, Sibree MM et al (2019) Immune regulation by fibroblasts in tissue injury depends on uPARAP-mediated uptake of collectins. J Cell Biol 218:333–349. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201802148
Nørregaard KS, Krigslund O, Behrendt N et al (2020) The collagen receptor uPARAP/Endo180 regulates collectins through unique structural elements in its FNII domain. J Biol Chem 295:9157–9170. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA120.013710
Sturge J, Wienke D, East L et al (2003) GPI-anchored uPAR requires Endo180 for rapid directional sensing during chemotaxis. J Cell Biol 162:789–794. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200302124
Didiasova M, Wujak L, Wygrecka M, Zakrzewicz D (2014) From plasminogen to plasmin: role of plasminogen receptors in human cancer. MDPI AG 15:21229–21252
Ploug M, Ronne E, Behrendt N et al (1991) Cellular receptor for urokinase plasminogen activator. carboxyl-terminal processing and membrane anchoring by glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol. J Biol Chem 266:1926–1933
Carmeliet P, Moons L, Lijnen R et al (1997) Urokinase-generated plasmin activates matrix metalloproteinases during aneurysm formation. Nat Genet 17:439–444. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1297-439
Mahmood N, Mihalcioiu C, Rabbani SA (2018) Multifaceted Role of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and Its receptor (uPAR): diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic applications. Front Oncol 8:24. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2018.00024
Nykjaer A, Conese M, Christensen EI et al (1997) Recycling of the urokinase receptor upon internalization of the uPA:serpin complexes. EMBO J 16:2610–2620. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/16.10.2610
Cortese K, Sahores M, Madsen CD et al (2008) Clathrin and LRP-1-independent constitutive endocytosis and recycling of uPAR. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003730
Sturge J, Wienke D, Isacke CM (2006) Endosomes generate localized Rho-ROCK-MLC2-based contractile signals via Endo 180 to promote adhesion disassembly. J Cell Biol 175:337–347. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200602125
Alitalo K (2011) The lymphatic vasculature in disease. Nat Med 17:1371–1380. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2545
Stacker SA, Williams SP, Karnezis T et al (2014) Lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic vessel remodelling in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 14:159–172. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3677
Paupert J, Sounni NE, Noël A (2011) Lymphangiogenesis in post-natal tissue remodeling: lymphatic endothelial cell connection with its environment. Mol Asp Med 32:146–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mam.2011.04.002
Karaman S, Detmar M. (2014) Mechanisms of lymphatic metastasis. https://www.jci.org/articles/view/71606/cite. Accessed 15 Apr 2020
Cady B (2007) Regional lymph node metastases; a singular manifestation of the process of clinical metastases in cancer: contemporary animal research and clinical reports suggest unifying concepts. Ann Surg Oncol 14:1790–1800. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-006-9234-2
Alitalo K, Tammela T, Petrova TV (2005) Lymphangiogenesis in development and human disease. Nature 438:946–953. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04480
Padera TP, Meijer EFJ, Munn LL (2016) The Lymphatic System in Disease processes and cancer progression. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 18:125–158. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-112315-031200
Takahashi S, Yamada-Okabe H, Hamada K et al (2011) Downregulation of uPARAP mediates cytoskeletal rearrangements and decreases invasion and migration properties in glioma cells. J Neurooncol 103:267–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-010-0398-z
Messaritou G, East L, Roghi C et al (2009) Membrane type-1 matrix metalloproteinase activity is regulated by the endocytic collagen receptor Endo180. J Cell Sci 122:4042–4048. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.044305
Wagenaar-Miller RA, Engelholm LH, Gavard J et al (2007) Complementary roles of intracellular and pericellular collagen degradation pathways in vivo. Mol Cell Biol 27:6309–6322. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00291-07
Fasquelle C, Sartelet A, Li W et al (2009) Balancing selection of a frame-shift mutation in the MRC2 gene accounts for the outbreak of the crooked tail syndrome in belgian blue cattle. PLoS Genet. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000666
Sartelet A, Klingbeil P, Franklin CK et al (2012) Allelic heterogeneity of crooked tail syndrome: result of balancing selection? Anim Genet 43:604–607. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2011.02311.x
Madsen DH, Jürgensen HJ, Ingvarsen S et al (2013) Differential actions of the endocytic collagen receptor uPARAP/Endo180 and the collagenase MMP-2 in bone homeostasis. PLoS One 8:e71261. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071261
Abdelgawad ME, Delaisse J-M, Hinge M et al (2016) Early reversal cells in adult human bone remodeling: osteoblastic nature, catabolic functions and interactions with osteoclasts. Histochem Cell Biol 145:603–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418-016-1414-y
Bundesmann MM, Wagner TE, Chow Y-H et al (2012) Role of urokinase plasminogen activator receptor-associated protein in mouse lung. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 46:233–239. https://doi.org/10.1165/rcmb.2010-0485OC
Podolsky MJ, Yang CD, Valenzuela CL et al (2020) Age-dependent regulation of cell-mediated collagen turnover. JCI Insight 5:137519. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.137519
Madsen DH, Jürgensen HJ, Ingvarsen S et al (2012) Endocytic collagen degradation: a novel mechanism involved in protection against liver fibrosis. J Pathol 227:94–105. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.3981
López-Guisa JM, Cai X, Collins SJ et al (2012) Mannose receptor 2 attenuates renal fibrosis. J Am Soc Nephrol 23:236–251. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2011030310
Curino AC, Engelholm LH, Yamada SS et al (2005) Intracellular collagen degradation mediated by uPARAP/Endo180 is a major pathway of extracellular matrix turnover during malignancy. J Cell Biol 169:977–985. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200411153
Caley MP, King H, Shah N et al (2016) Tumor-associated Endo180 requires stromal-derived LOX to promote metastatic prostate cancer cell migration on human ECM surfaces. Clin Exp Metastasis 33:151–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-015-9765-7
Jungwirth U, van Weverwijk A, Evans RJ et al (2021) Impairment of a distinct cancer-associated fibroblast population limits tumour growth and metastasis. Nat Commun 12:3516. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23583-1
Mhaidly R, Mechta-Grigoriou F (2021) Role of cancer-associated fibroblast subpopulations in immune infiltration, as a new means of treatment in cancer. Immunol Rev 302:259–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.12978
Huijbers IJ, Iravani M, Popov S et al (2010) A role for fibrillar collagen deposition and the collagen internalization receptor endo180 in glioma invasion. PLoS One 5:e9808. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009808
Wienke D, Davies GC, Johnson DA et al (2007) The collagen receptor Endo180 (CD280) Is expressed on basal-like breast tumor cells and promotes tumor growth in vivo. Cancer Res 67:10230–10240. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3496
Gai X, Tu K, Lu Z, Zheng X (2014) MRC2 expression correlates with TGFβ1 and survival in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci 15:15011–15025. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms150915011
Caley MP, Kogianni G, Adamarek A et al (2012) TGFβ1-Endo180-dependent collagen deposition is dysregulated at the tumour-stromal interface in bone metastasis. J Pathol 226:775–783. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.3958
Palmieri C, Caley MP, Purshouse K et al (2013) Endo180 modulation by bisphosphonates and diagnostic accuracy in metastatic breast cancer. Br J Cancer 108:163–169. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.540
Engelholm LH, Melander MC, Hald A et al (2016) Targeting a novel bone degradation pathway in primary bone cancer by inactivation of the collagen receptor uPARAP/Endo180. J Pathol 238:120–133. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.4661
Nielsen CF, Van Putten SM, Lund IK et al (2017) The collagen receptor uPARAP/Endo180 as a novel target for antibody-drug conjugate mediated treatment of mesenchymal and leukemic cancers. Oncotarget 8:44605–44624. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.17883
Ji B, Chen J, Zhen C et al (2020) Mathematical modelling of the role of Endo180 network in the development of metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer. Comput Biol Med 117:103619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103619
Acknowledgement
The authors also acknowledge Animascience for the figures. Indeed, all the figures are original ideas from the authors and illustrated by Animascience. All figure rights have been transferred to the authors.
Funding
This work was supported by grants from the Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique—FNRS (F.R.S.-FNRS, Belgium), the Fondation Contre le Cancer (foundation of public interest, Belgium), the Fonds Spéciaux de la Recherche (University of Liège), the Fondation Hospital Universitaire Léon Fredericq (FHULF, University of Liège), the Walloon Region through the FRFS-WELBIO strategic research program and “Walinnov Immucan-1610119”, the Wallonia-Brussels Federation (grant for Concerted Research Actions, A.R.C. 19/23-21 “INovLYMPHATIC”).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All the authors have contributed to manuscript redaction and revision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Not applicable.
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Gucciardo, F., Pirson, S., Baudin, L. et al. uPARAP/Endo180: a multifaceted protein of mesenchymal cells. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 79, 255 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-022-04249-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-022-04249-7