Abstract
We investigate the sensitivity of the FASERν detector to new physics in the form of non-standard neutrino interactions. FASERν, which will be installed 480 m downstream of the ATLAS interaction point, will for the first time study interactions of multi-TeV neutrinos from a controlled source. Our formalism — which is applicable to any current and future neutrino experiment — is based on the Standard Model Effective Theory (SMEFT) and its counterpart, Weak Effective Field Theory (WEFT), below the electroweak scale. Starting from the WEFT Lagrangian, we compute the coefficients that modify neutrino production in meson decays and detection via deep-inelastic scattering, and we express the new physics effects in terms of modified flavor transition probabilities. For some coupling structures, we find that FASERν will be able to constrain interactions that are two to three orders of magnitude weaker than Standard Model weak interactions, implying that the experiment will be indirectly probing new physics at the multi-TeV scale. In some cases, FASERν constraints will become comparable to existing limits — some of them derived for the first time in this paper — already with 150 fb−1 of data.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
U. Dore, P. Loverre and L. Ludovici, History of accelerator neutrino beams, Eur. Phys. J. H 44 (2019) 271 [arXiv:1805.01373] [INSPIRE].
J. L. Feng, I. Galon, F. Kling and S. Trojanowski, ForwArd Search ExpeRiment at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 035001 [arXiv:1708.09389] [INSPIRE].
FASER collaboration, Detecting and Studying High-Energy Collider Neutrinos with FASER at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 61 [arXiv:1908.02310] [INSPIRE].
FASER collaboration, First neutrino interaction candidates at the LHC, arXiv:2105.06197 [INSPIRE].
A. Ismail, R. Mammen Abraham and F. Kling, Neutral current neutrino interactions at FASERν, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 056014 [arXiv:2012.10500] [INSPIRE].
W. Buchmüller and D. Wyler, Effective Lagrangian Analysis of New Interactions and Flavor Conservation, Nucl. Phys. B 268 (1986) 621 [INSPIRE].
B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian, JHEP 10 (2010) 085 [arXiv:1008.4884] [INSPIRE].
A. Falkowski, M. González-Alonso and Z. Tabrizi, Reactor neutrino oscillations as constraints on Effective Field Theory, JHEP 05 (2019) 173 [arXiv:1901.04553] [INSPIRE].
A. Falkowski, M. González-Alonso and Z. Tabrizi, Consistent QFT description of non-standard neutrino interactions, JHEP 11 (2020) 048 [arXiv:1910.02971] [INSPIRE].
SHiP collaboration, SND@LHC, arXiv:2002.08722 [INSPIRE].
V. V. Gligorov, S. Knapen, B. Nachman, M. Papucci and D. J. Robinson, Leveraging the ALICE/L3 cavern for long-lived particle searches, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 015023 [arXiv:1810.03636] [INSPIRE].
D. Curtin et al., Long-Lived Particles at the Energy Frontier: The MATHUSLA Physics Case, Rept. Prog. Phys. 82 (2019) 116201 [arXiv:1806.07396] [INSPIRE].
V. V. Gligorov, S. Knapen, M. Papucci and D. J. Robinson, Searching for Long-lived Particles: A Compact Detector for Exotics at LHCb, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 015023 [arXiv:1708.09395] [INSPIRE].
MoEDAL collaboration, Technical Design Report of the MoEDAL Experiment, CERN-LHCC-2009-006, MoEDAL-TDR-001 (2009).
S. Bergmann, Y. Grossman and E. Nardi, Neutrino propagation in matter with general interactions, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 093008 [hep-ph/9903517] [INSPIRE].
S. Antusch, C. Biggio, E. Fernandez-Martinez, M. B. Gavela and J. Lopez-Pavon, Unitarity of the Leptonic Mixing Matrix, JHEP 10 (2006) 084 [hep-ph/0607020] [INSPIRE].
J. Kopp, M. Lindner, T. Ota and J. Sato, Non-standard neutrino interactions in reactor and superbeam experiments, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 013007 [arXiv:0708.0152] [INSPIRE].
A. Bolanos, O. G. Miranda, A. Palazzo, M. A. Tortola and J. W. F. Valle, Probing non-standard neutrino-electron interactions with solar and reactor neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 113012 [arXiv:0812.4417] [INSPIRE].
T. Ohlsson and H. Zhang, Non-Standard Interaction Effects at Reactor Neutrino Experiments, Phys. Lett. B 671 (2009) 99 [arXiv:0809.4835] [INSPIRE].
D. Delepine, V. Gonzalez Macias, S. Khalil and G. Lopez Castro, QFT results for neutrino oscillations and New Physics, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 093003 [arXiv:0901.1460] [INSPIRE].
C. Biggio, M. Blennow and E. Fernandez-Martinez, General bounds on non-standard neutrino interactions, JHEP 08 (2009) 090 [arXiv:0907.0097] [INSPIRE].
R. Leitner, M. Malinsky, B. Roskovec and H. Zhang, Non-standard antineutrino interactions at Daya Bay, JHEP 12 (2011) 001 [arXiv:1105.5580] [INSPIRE].
T. Ohlsson, Status of non-standard neutrino interactions, Rept. Prog. Phys. 76 (2013) 044201 [arXiv:1209.2710] [INSPIRE].
A. Rashed, P. Sharma and A. Datta, Tau neutrino as a probe of nonstandard interaction, Nucl. Phys. B 877 (2013) 662 [arXiv:1303.4332] [INSPIRE].
A. Esmaili and A. Y. Smirnov, Probing Non-Standard Interaction of Neutrinos with IceCube and DeepCore, JHEP 06 (2013) 026 [arXiv:1304.1042] [INSPIRE].
Y.-F. Li and Y.-L. Zhou, Shifts of neutrino oscillation parameters in reactor antineutrino experiments with non-standard interactions, Nucl. Phys. B 888 (2014) 137 [arXiv:1408.6301] [INSPIRE].
S. K. Agarwalla, P. Bagchi, D. V. Forero and M. Tórtola, Probing Non-Standard Interactions at Daya Bay, JHEP 07 (2015) 060 [arXiv:1412.1064] [INSPIRE].
M. Blennow, S. Choubey, T. Ohlsson and S. K. Raut, Exploring Source and Detector Non-Standard Neutrino Interactions at ESSνSB, JHEP 09 (2015) 096 [arXiv:1507.02868] [INSPIRE].
P. Coloma, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni and T. Schwetz, COHERENT Enlightenment of the Neutrino Dark Side, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 115007 [arXiv:1708.02899] [INSPIRE].
Y. Farzan and M. Tortola, Neutrino oscillations and Non-Standard Interactions, Front. in Phys. 6 (2018) 10 [arXiv:1710.09360] [INSPIRE].
D. Choudhury, K. Ghosh and S. Niyogi, Probing nonstandard neutrino interactions at the LHC Run II, Phys. Lett. B 784 (2018) 248 [arXiv:1801.01513] [INSPIRE].
J. Heeck, M. Lindner, W. Rodejohann and S. Vogl, Non-Standard Neutrino Interactions and Neutral Gauge Bosons, SciPost Phys. 6 (2019) 038 [arXiv:1812.04067] [INSPIRE].
W. Altmannshofer, M. Tammaro and J. Zupan, Non-standard neutrino interactions and low energy experiments, JHEP 09 (2019) 083 [arXiv:1812.02778] [INSPIRE].
D. Aristizabal Sierra, V. De Romeri and N. Rojas, COHERENT analysis of neutrino generalized interactions, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 075018 [arXiv:1806.07424] [INSPIRE].
I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler and J. Salvado, Updated constraints on non-standard interactions from global analysis of oscillation data, JHEP 08 (2018) 180 [Addendum ibid. 12 (2020) 152] [arXiv:1805.04530] [INSPIRE].
J. Alimena et al., Searching for long-lived particles beyond the Standard Model at the Large Hadron Collider, J. Phys. G 47 (2020) 090501 [arXiv:1903.04497] [INSPIRE].
J. L. Feng, I. Galon, F. Kling and S. Trojanowski, Dark Higgs bosons at the ForwArd Search ExpeRiment, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 055034 [arXiv:1710.09387] [INSPIRE].
N. Okada and D. Raut, Hunting inflatons at FASER, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 055022 [arXiv:1910.09663] [INSPIRE].
I. Boiarska, K. Bondarenko, A. Boyarsky, M. Ovchynnikov, O. Ruchayskiy and A. Sokolenko, Light scalar production from Higgs bosons and FASER 2, JHEP 05 (2020) 049 [arXiv:1908.04635] [INSPIRE].
F. Kling and S. Trojanowski, Heavy Neutral Leptons at FASER, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 095016 [arXiv:1801.08947] [INSPIRE].
J. C. Helo, M. Hirsch and Z. S. Wang, Heavy neutral fermions at the high-luminosity LHC, JHEP 07 (2018) 056 [arXiv:1803.02212] [INSPIRE].
F. Deppisch, S. Kulkarni and W. Liu, Heavy neutrino production via Z′ at the lifetime frontier, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 035005 [arXiv:1905.11889] [INSPIRE].
J. L. Feng, I. Galon, F. Kling and S. Trojanowski, Axionlike particles at FASER: The LHC as a photon beam dump, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 055021 [arXiv:1806.02348] [INSPIRE].
A. Berlin and F. Kling, Inelastic Dark Matter at the LHC Lifetime Frontier: ATLAS, CMS, LHCb, CODEX-b, FASER, and MATHUSLA, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 015021 [arXiv:1810.01879] [INSPIRE].
D. Dercks, J. De Vries, H. K. Dreiner and Z. S. Wang, R-parity Violation and Light Neutralinos at CODEX-b, FASER, and MATHUSLA, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 055039 [arXiv:1810.03617] [INSPIRE].
FASER collaboration, FASER’s physics reach for long-lived particles, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 095011 [arXiv:1811.12522] [INSPIRE].
K. Jodłowski, F. Kling, L. Roszkowski and S. Trojanowski, Extending the reach of FASER, MATHUSLA, and SHiP towards smaller lifetimes using secondary particle production, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 095020 [arXiv:1911.11346] [INSPIRE].
J. De Vries, H. K. Dreiner, J. Y. Günther, Z. S. Wang and G. Zhou, Long-lived Sterile Neutrinos at the LHC in Effective Field Theory, JHEP 03 (2021) 148 [arXiv:2010.07305] [INSPIRE].
K. Jodłowski and S. Trojanowski, Neutrino beam-dump experiment with FASER at the LHC, JHEP 05 (2021) 191 [arXiv:2011.04751] [INSPIRE].
M. Bahraminasr, P. Bakhti and M. Rajaee, Sensitivities to secret neutrino interaction at FASERν, arXiv:2003.09985 [INSPIRE].
F. Kling, Probing light gauge bosons in tau neutrino experiments, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 015007 [arXiv:2005.03594] [INSPIRE].
P. Bakhti, Y. Farzan and S. Pascoli, Unravelling the richness of dark sector by FASERν, JHEP 10 (2020) 008 [arXiv:2006.05437] [INSPIRE].
P. Bakhti, Y. Farzan and S. Pascoli, Discovery potential of FASERν with contained vertex and through-going events, JHEP 04 (2021) 075 [arXiv:2010.16312] [INSPIRE].
S. Buontempo, G. M. Dallavalle, G. De Lellis, D. Lazic and F. L. Navarria, CMS-XSEN: LHC Neutrinos at CMS. Experiment Feasibility Study, arXiv:1804.04413 [INSPIRE].
N. Beni et al., Physics Potential of an Experiment using LHC Neutrinos, J. Phys. G 46 (2019) 115008 [arXiv:1903.06564] [INSPIRE].
M. A. B. Beg, R. V. Budny, R. N. Mohapatra and A. Sirlin, Manifest Left-Right Symmetry and Its Experimental Consequences, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (1977) 1252 [Erratum ibid. 39 (1977) 54] [INSPIRE].
P. Langacker and S. U. Sankar, Bounds on the Mass of WR and the WL − WR Mixing Angle ξ in General SU(2)L × SU(2)R × U(1) Models, Phys. Rev. D 40 (1989) 1569 [INSPIRE].
W. Buchmüller, R. Ruckl and D. Wyler, Leptoquarks in Lepton-Quark Collisions, Phys. Lett. B 191 (1987) 442 [Erratum ibid. 448 (1999) 320] [INSPIRE].
S. Davidson, D. C. Bailey and B. A. Campbell, Model independent constraints on leptoquarks from rare processes, Z. Phys. C 61 (1994) 613 [hep-ph/9309310] [INSPIRE].
I. Doršner, S. Fajfer, A. Greljo, J. F. Kamenik and N. Košnik, Physics of leptoquarks in precision experiments and at particle colliders, Phys. Rept. 641 (2016) 1 [arXiv:1603.04993] [INSPIRE].
Y. Liao, X.-D. Ma and Q.-Y. Wang, Extending low energy effective field theory with a complete set of dimension-7 operators, JHEP 08 (2020) 162 [arXiv:2005.08013] [INSPIRE].
V. Cirigliano, M. Gonzalez-Alonso and M. L. Graesser, Non-standard Charged Current Interactions: beta decays versus the LHC, JHEP 02 (2013) 046 [arXiv:1210.4553] [INSPIRE].
E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar and P. Stoffer, Low-Energy Effective Field Theory below the Electroweak Scale: Operators and Matching, JHEP 03 (2018) 016 [arXiv:1709.04486] [INSPIRE].
S. Descotes-Genon, A. Falkowski, M. Fedele, M. González-Alonso and J. Virto, The CKM parameters in the SMEFT, JHEP 05 (2019) 172 [arXiv:1812.08163] [INSPIRE].
S. Carrazza, C. Degrande, S. Iranipour, J. Rojo and M. Ubiali, Can New Physics hide inside the proton?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 132001 [arXiv:1905.05215] [INSPIRE].
Flavour Lattice Averaging Group collaboration, FLAG Review 2019: Flavour Lattice Averaging Group (FLAG), Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 113 [arXiv:1902.08191] [INSPIRE].
Particle Data Group collaboration, Review of Particle Physics, PTEP 2020 (2020) 083C01 [INSPIRE].
A. D. Martin, W. J. Stirling, R. S. Thorne and G. Watt, Parton distributions for the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 63 (2009) 189 [arXiv:0901.0002] [INSPIRE].
F. Kling, private communication (2021).
F. Kling, Forward Neutrino Fluxes at the LHC, arXiv:2105.08270 [INSPIRE].
W. Bai, M. Diwan, M. V. Garzelli, Y. S. Jeong and M. H. Reno, Far-forward neutrinos at the Large Hadron Collider, JHEP 06 (2020) 032 [arXiv:2002.03012] [INSPIRE].
E.-J. Ahn, R. Engel, T. K. Gaisser, P. Lipari and T. Stanev, Cosmic ray interaction event generator SIBYLL 2.1, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 094003 [arXiv:0906.4113] [INSPIRE].
F. Riehn, R. Engel, A. Fedynitch, T. K. Gaisser and T. Stanev, A new version of the event generator Sibyll, PoS ICRC2015 (2016) 558 [arXiv:1510.00568] [INSPIRE].
F. Riehn, H. P. Dembinski, R. Engel, A. Fedynitch, T. K. Gaisser and T. Stanev, The hadronic interaction model SIBYLL 2.3c and Feynman scaling, PoS ICRC2017 (2018) 301 [arXiv:1709.07227] [INSPIRE].
A. Fedynitch, F. Riehn, R. Engel, T. K. Gaisser and T. Stanev, Hadronic interaction model sibyll 2.3c and inclusive lepton fluxes, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 103018 [arXiv:1806.04140] [INSPIRE].
F. Kling and J. L. Feng, Forward Physics Facility, August 2020 [https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4009641].
V. Cirigliano, K. Fuyuto, C. Lee, E. Mereghetti and B. Yan, Charged Lepton Flavor Violation at the EIC, JHEP 03 (2021) 256 [arXiv:2102.06176] [INSPIRE].
V. Cirigliano, A. Falkowski, M. González-Alonso and A. Rodríguez-Sánchez, Hadronic τ Decays as New Physics Probes in the LHC Era, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 221801 [arXiv:1809.01161] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for High-Mass Resonances Decaying to τν in pp Collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV with the ATLAS Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 161802 [arXiv:1801.06992] [INSPIRE].
S. Gonzàlez-Solís, A. Miranda, J. Rendón and P. Roig, Exclusive hadronic tau decays as probes of non-SM interactions, Phys. Lett. B 804 (2020) 135371 [arXiv:1912.08725] [INSPIRE].
J. Fuentes-Martin, A. Greljo, J. Martin Camalich and J. D. Ruiz-Alvarez, Charm physics confronts high-pT lepton tails, JHEP 11 (2020) 080 [arXiv:2003.12421] [INSPIRE].
NOMAD collaboration, Final NOMAD results on νμ → ντ and νe → ντ oscillations including a new search for ντ appearance using hadronic τ decays, Nucl. Phys. B 611 (2001) 3 [hep-ex/0106102] [INSPIRE].
NOMAD collaboration, Search for νμ → νe oscillations in the NOMAD experiment, Phys. Lett. B 570 (2003) 19 [hep-ex/0306037] [INSPIRE].
M. González-Alonso and J. Martin Camalich, Global Effective-Field-Theory analysis of New-Physics effects in (semi)leptonic kaon decays, JHEP 12 (2016) 052 [arXiv:1605.07114] [INSPIRE].
A. Falkowski, M. González-Alonso and O. Naviliat-Cuncic, Comprehensive analysis of beta decays within and beyond the Standard Model, JHEP 04 (2021) 126 [arXiv:2010.13797] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for charged lepton-flavour violation in top-quark decays at the LHC with the ATLAS detector, ATL-PHYS-PROC-2018-120 (2018) [DOI].
V. Cirigliano and I. Rosell, Two-loop effective theory analysis of π(K) → \( e{\overline{v}}_e\left[\gamma \right] \) branching ratios, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 231801 [arXiv:0707.3439] [INSPIRE].
T. Bhattacharya et al., Probing Novel Scalar and Tensor Interactions from (Ultra)Cold Neutrons to the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 054512 [arXiv:1110.6448] [INSPIRE].
M. González-Alonso, J. Martin Camalich and K. Mimouni, Renormalization-group evolution of new physics contributions to (semi)leptonic meson decays, Phys. Lett. B 772 (2017) 777 [arXiv:1706.00410] [INSPIRE].
D. Bečirević, F. Jaffredo, A. Peñuelas and O. Sumensari, New Physics effects in leptonic and semileptonic decays, JHEP 05 (2021) 175 [arXiv:2012.09872] [INSPIRE].
W. Dekens and P. Stoffer, Low-energy effective field theory below the electroweak scale: matching at one loop, JHEP 10 (2019) 197 [arXiv:1908.05295] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for a new heavy gauge boson resonance decaying into a lepton and missing transverse momentum in 36 fb−1 of pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV with the ATLAS experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 401 [arXiv:1706.04786] [INSPIRE].
R. Gupta, Y.-C. Jang, B. Yoon, H.-W. Lin, V. Cirigliano and T. Bhattacharya, Isovector Charges of the Nucleon from 2 + 1 + 1-flavor Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 034503 [arXiv:1806.09006] [INSPIRE].
A. Falkowski, M. González-Alonso and K. Mimouni, Compilation of low-energy constraints on 4-fermion operators in the SMEFT, JHEP 08 (2017) 123 [arXiv:1706.03783] [INSPIRE].
J. Alwall et al., The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP 07 (2014) 079 [arXiv:1405.0301] [INSPIRE].
I. Brivio, Y. Jiang and M. Trott, The SMEFTsim package, theory and tools, JHEP 12 (2017) 070 [arXiv:1709.06492] [INSPIRE].
I. Brivio, SMEFTsim 3.0 — a practical guide, JHEP 04 (2021) 073 [arXiv:2012.11343] [INSPIRE].
T. Sjöstrand et al., An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159 [arXiv:1410.3012] [INSPIRE].
DELPHES 3 collaboration, DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment, JHEP 02 (2014) 057 [arXiv:1307.6346] [INSPIRE].
V. Cirigliano, S. Gardner and B. Holstein, Beta Decays and Non-Standard Interactions in the LHC Era, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 71 (2013) 93 [arXiv:1303.6953] [INSPIRE].
V. Cirigliano, R. Kitano, Y. Okada and P. Tuzon, On the model discriminating power of μ → e conversion in nuclei, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 013002 [arXiv:0904.0957] [INSPIRE].
SINDRUM II collaboration, A Search for muon to electron conversion in muonic gold, Eur. Phys. J. C 47 (2006) 337 [INSPIRE].
V. Cirigliano, S. Davidson and Y. Kuno, Spin-dependent μ → e conversion, Phys. Lett. B 771 (2017) 242 [arXiv:1703.02057] [INSPIRE].
R. Kitano, M. Koike and Y. Okada, Detailed calculation of lepton flavor violating muon electron conversion rate for various nuclei, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 096002 [Erratum ibid. 76 (2007) 059902] [hep-ph/0203110] [INSPIRE].
FlaviaNet Working Group on Kaon Decays collaboration, Precision tests of the Standard Model with leptonic and semileptonic kaon decays, in 5th International Workshop on e+ e− Collisions from Phi to Psi, (2008) [arXiv:0801.1817] [INSPIRE].
FlaviaNet Working Group on Kaon Decays collaboration, An Evaluation of |Vus| and precise tests of the Standard Model from world data on leptonic and semileptonic kaon decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 69 (2010) 399 [arXiv:1005.2323] [INSPIRE].
N. Carrasco, P. Lami, V. Lubicz, L. Riggio, S. Simula and C. Tarantino, K → π semileptonic form factors with Nf = 2 + 1 + 1 twisted mass fermions, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 114512 [arXiv:1602.04113] [INSPIRE].
I. Baum, V. Lubicz, G. Martinelli, L. Orifici and S. Simula, Matrix elements of the electromagnetic operator between kaon and pion states, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 074503 [arXiv:1108.1021] [INSPIRE].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2105.12136
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Falkowski, A., González-Alonso, M., Kopp, J. et al. EFT at FASERν. J. High Energ. Phys. 2021, 86 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2021)086
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2021)086