Abstract
Consistency between quantum mechanical and general relativistic views of the world is a longstanding problem, which becomes particularly prominent in black hole physics. We develop a coherent picture addressing this issue by studying the quantum mechanics of an evolving black hole. After interpreting the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy as the entropy representing the degrees of freedom that are coarse-grained to obtain a semiclassical description from the microscopic theory of quantum gravity, we discuss the properties these degrees of freedom exhibit when viewed from the semiclassical standpoint. We are led to the conclusion that they show features which we call extreme relativeness and spacetime-matter duality — a nontrivial reference frame dependence of their spacetime distribution and the dual roles they play as the “constituents” of spacetime and as thermal radiation. We describe black hole formation and evaporation processes in distant and infalling reference frames, showing that these two properties allow us to avoid the arguments for firewalls and to make the existence of the black hole interior consistent with unitary evolution in the sense of complementarity. Our analysis provides a concrete answer to how information can be preserved at the quantum level throughout the evolution of a black hole, and gives a basic picture of how general coordinate transformations may work at the level of full quantum gravity beyond the approximation of semiclassical theory.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
J. Preskill, Do black holes destroy information?, in Blackholes, membranes, wormholes and superstrings, S. Kalara and D.V. Nanopoulos eds., World Scientific, Singapore (1993), hep-th/9209058 [INSPIRE].
G. ’t Hooft, The black hole interpretation of string theory, Nucl. Phys. B 335 (1990) 138 [INSPIRE].
C.R. Stephens, G. ’t Hooft and B.F. Whiting, Black hole evaporation without information loss, Class. Quant. Grav. 11 (1994) 621 [gr-qc/9310006] [INSPIRE].
W.K. Wootters and W.H. Zurek, A single quantum cannot be cloned, Nature 299 (1982) 802 [INSPIRE].
L. Susskind, L. Thorlacius and J. Uglum, The stretched horizon and black hole complementarity, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 3743 [hep-th/9306069] [INSPIRE].
A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski and J. Sully, Black holes: complementarity or firewalls?, JHEP 02 (2013) 062 [arXiv:1207.3123] [INSPIRE].
A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski, D. Stanford and J. Sully, An apologia for firewalls, JHEP 09 (2013) 018 [arXiv:1304.6483] [INSPIRE].
D. Marolf and J. Polchinski, Gauge/gravity duality and the black hole interior, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 171301 [arXiv:1307.4706] [INSPIRE].
S.W. Hawking, Breakdown of predictability in gravitational collapse, Phys. Rev. D 14 (1976) 2460 [INSPIRE].
J.D. Bekenstein, Black holes and entropy, Phys. Rev. D 7 (1973) 2333 [INSPIRE].
S.W. Hawking, Particle creation by black holes, Commun. Math. Phys. 43 (1975) 199 [Erratum ibid. 46 (1976) 206] [INSPIRE].
Y. Nomura and S.J. Weinberg, Black holes, entropies and semiclassical spacetime in quantum gravity, JHEP 10 (2014) 185 [arXiv:1406.1505] [INSPIRE].
P. Hayden and J. Preskill, Black holes as mirrors: quantum information in random subsystems, JHEP 09 (2007) 120 [arXiv:0708.4025] [INSPIRE].
Y. Sekino and L. Susskind, Fast scramblers, JHEP 10 (2008) 065 [arXiv:0808.2096] [INSPIRE].
Y. Nomura, Quantum mechanics, spacetime locality and gravity, Found. Phys. 43 (2013) 978 [arXiv:1110.4630] [INSPIRE].
Y. Nomura, F. Sanches and S.J. Weinberg, The black hole interior in quantum gravity, arXiv:1412.7539 [INSPIRE].
Y. Nomura, Physical theories, eternal inflation and quantum universe, JHEP 11 (2011) 063 [arXiv:1104.2324] [INSPIRE].
B.S. DeWitt, Quantum theory of gravity. 1. The canonical theory, Phys. Rev. 160 (1967) 1113 [INSPIRE].
Y. Nomura, The static quantum multiverse, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 083505 [arXiv:1205.5550] [INSPIRE].
Y. Nomura, J. Varela and S.J. Weinberg, Low energy description of quantum gravity and complementarity, Phys. Lett. B 733 (2014) 126 [arXiv:1304.0448] [INSPIRE].
D.N. Page, Is black hole evaporation predictable?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44 (1980) 301 [INSPIRE].
Y. Nomura, J. Varela and S.J. Weinberg, Black holes, information and Hilbert space for quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 084050 [arXiv:1210.6348] [INSPIRE].
G. ’t Hooft, Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity, in Salamfestschrift, A. Ali, J. Ellis and S. Randjbar-Daemi eds., World Scientific, Singapore (1994), gr-qc/9310026 [INSPIRE].
Y. Nomura and S.J. Weinberg, Entropy of a vacuum: what does the covariant entropy count?, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 104003 [arXiv:1310.7564] [INSPIRE].
D.N. Page, Average entropy of a subsystem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 1291 [gr-qc/9305007] [INSPIRE].
Y. Takahashi and H. Umezawa, Thermo field dynamics, Collective Phenomena 2 (1975) 55.
J.B. Hartle and S.W. Hawking, Path integral derivation of black hole radiance, Phys. Rev. D 13 (1976) 2188 [INSPIRE].
W.G. Unruh, Notes on black hole evaporation, Phys. Rev. D 14 (1976) 870 [INSPIRE].
J.M. Bardeen, Black holes do evaporate thermally, Phys. Rev. Lett. 46 (1981) 382 [INSPIRE].
R. Balbinot, Hawking radiation and the back reaction — a first approach, Class. Quant. Grav. 1 (1984) 573.
G. Dvali, Black holes and large-N species solution to the hierarchy problem, Fortsch. Phys. 58 (2010) 528 [arXiv:0706.2050] [INSPIRE].
W.G. Unruh and R.M. Wald, Acceleration radiation and generalized second law of thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 25 (1982) 942 [INSPIRE].
A.R. Brown, Tensile strength and the mining of black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 211301 [arXiv:1207.3342] [INSPIRE].
D.N. Page, Information in black hole radiation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 3743 [hep-th/9306083] [INSPIRE].
D.N. Page, Particle emission rates from a black hole: massless particles from an uncharged, nonrotating hole, Phys. Rev. D 13 (1976) 198 [INSPIRE].
W.H. Zurek, Entropy evaporated by a black hole, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 (1982) 1683 [INSPIRE].
D.N. Page, Comment on ‘entropy evaporated by a black hole’, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50 (1983) 1013 [INSPIRE].
L. Susskind, Strings, black holes and Lorentz contraction, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 6606 [hep-th/9308139] [INSPIRE].
W.G. Unruh and R.M. Wald, What happens when an accelerating observer detects a Rindler particle, Phys. Rev. D 29 (1984) 1047 [INSPIRE].
L. Susskind, The world as a hologram, J. Math. Phys. 36 (1995) 6377 [hep-th/9409089] [INSPIRE].
R. Bousso, A covariant entropy conjecture, JHEP 07 (1999) 004 [hep-th/9905177] [INSPIRE].
S.L. Braunstein, S. Pirandola and K. Życzkowski, Better late than never: information retrieval from black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 101301 [arXiv:0907.1190] [INSPIRE].
S.D. Mathur, The information paradox: a pedagogical introduction, Class. Quant. Grav. 26 (2009) 224001 [arXiv:0909.1038] [INSPIRE].
S.B. Giddings, Nonlocality versus complementarity: a conservative approach to the information problem, Class. Quant. Grav. 28 (2011) 025002 [arXiv:0911.3395] [INSPIRE].
G.W. Gibbons and S.W. Hawking, Cosmological event horizons, thermodynamics and particle creation, Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 2738 [INSPIRE].
L. Susskind and J. Lindesay, An introduction to black holes, information and the string theory revolution: the holographic universe, World Scientific, Singapore (2005).
J.M. Maldacena, The large-N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38 (1999) 1113 [Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231] [hep-th/9711200] [INSPIRE].
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ArXiv ePrint: 1412.7538
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Nomura, Y., Sanches, F. & Weinberg, S.J. Relativeness in quantum gravity: limitations and frame dependence of semiclassical descriptions. J. High Energ. Phys. 2015, 158 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2015)158
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2015)158